Mad Hedge Technology Alerts!
You’ll most likely be driving a Chinese car soon.
It’s not because I want you to.
The trend is headed that way and the trend is usually your friend in economics and the stock market.
In the past year, China has blazed past Germany and Japan to become the world’s biggest exporter of cars for better or worse.
They shipped 1.07 million abroad in the first quarter of 2023.
At the same time, net zero rules are set to outlaw the sale of conventional petrol cars from 2030 in the UK and 2035 across the rest of Europe.
This is a golden opportunity for entrenched Chinese brands including SAIC, BYD, and Geely.
With rivals such as Volkswagen, Ford and Toyota scrambling to catch up, Chinese manufacturers are poised to offer cars costing as much as €10,000 (£8,600) less than their European, Japanese, and American competitors.
Beijing has sought to dominate the electric vehicles global market as part of its Made in China 2025 strategy.
More than half of the electric cars on roads worldwide are now in China, according to the International Energy Agency, while in 2022 the country accounted for around 60pc of all BEVs sold.
They have been focused on having an industrial upgrade in China, moving from lower value-added production to higher value-added, higher-technological production.
The strategy has worked like clockwork as Chinese-produced cell phones have achieved flagship levels.
Contemporary Amperex Technology Limited (CATL), based in the city of Ningde in the Fujian province, is now the world’s biggest lithium battery manufacturer.
In 2023, the country is set to export 1.3 million BEVs, up from 679,000 last year when government lockdowns were still in force.
Not only are these vehicles tick the box of high quality, they also boast long ranges, attractive designs, and smart interiors, they are also extremely cheap.
One brand British motorists should expect to see more of is BYD, which recently unveiled an electric hatchback that it plans to sell for less than £8,000 – far cheaper than many petrol-fueled models.
The approach contrasts sharply with that of America, where Joe Biden is showering firms that set up BEV factories with subsidies and hitting Chinese car imports with tariffs of 27.5%.
Ominously, however, China’s lead in EV technology is now so great that it “cannot be bridged” by 2030 – when Britain and Europe will impose restrictions on the sale of new petrol cars – and Europe should cut its losses by encouraging Chinese car makers to set up factories here instead.
For US EV makers like Tesla, the protectionist restrictions placed on foreign EVs will mean that it will take longer for the Chinese EVs to penetrate the US vehicle market.
However, the tsunami of deflation is coming whether the Chinese need to add an intermediary or not before they can start pouring the products into the United States.
If China is able to breach the US market, this would pose a severe test for US EV makers like GM, Tesla, Ford, and Lucid.
The Europeans are asleep at the wheel and could expose their consumers to a bevy of Chinese cars.
Don’t be shocked to see a stream of Chinese EVs when you cruise around Rome instead of Fiats and Vespas.
I expect restrictions to ramp up even more against foreign-made EVs and lithium batteries in the short term.
This could also set the stage for Tesla getting kicked out of Shanghai and a massive forced technology transfer which the Chinese are famous for.
The Chinese are playing the long game and that’s highly negative for American EV makers who are hell-bent on short-term profits.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
August 7, 2023
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(WHAT THE DOWNGRADE MEANS FOR TECH)
(AA+)
Fitch Ratings’ decision to strip the US of its AAA credit ranking to AA+ sets the stage for inflation to come roaring back, and tech stocks to underperform in the short term.
Why?
The downgrade risks bond yields blowing out, which in turn will potentially cause the U.S.’s interest payments on the debt to shift substantially higher.
That is exactly what investors don’t want to hear, in particular concerning technology stocks.
Tech stocks, along with U.S. housing prices, are most susceptible and sensitive to interest rate shocks and this could be a doozy.
The smaller the tech company is, the more reliant they are on initial debt funding to develop the company.
Big tech will be more insulated from this chaos because they are the equivalent of the reams of home buyers that purchased homes at a sub-3% interest rate that is fixed for 30 years.
As long as revenue is growing okay-ish, big tech will be fine, and the latest earnings reports have proved that with big tech’s unimpressive single-digit growth.
It’s nothing special but good enough for the times.
The booming federal deficits are the heart of the bear case for Treasuries and, even more poignant, the massive federal mismanagement of the country, no matter which political party has been in charge.
Take for instance, over 20 years and 3 presidents, a certain country would spend over $10 trillion in Afghanistan and the result is replacing the Taliban with the Taliban.
Many would say that wad of federal money probably wasn’t worth the paltry result.
Now, what we finally have is a real-life example of the consequences of government underperformance.
The U.S. economy is the most vibrant, productive, and profitable economy in the world.
Free market capitalism has catapulted the U.S. to build the largest and most successful tech industry in the world that is the envy of the rich world.
Now, exploding bond yields move to the fore as the largest risk for technology stocks.
The downgrade also means that Fed Chair Jerome Powell and the Central Bank will have a harder time pivoting when they want to because yields could spike and could have another dose of inflation to fight against.
The downgrade could invite a horde of algo traders and hedge fund pros to pile into the short-bond trade because where there is smoke, there is fire.
In the short term, don’t expect the 30-year US treasury yield to hit 10% which was the case in 1987.
However, a turn for the ugly and yields surpassing last year’s 4.35% is just in sign after this last melt up.
The stage could be set for the 30-year to reset at higher increments between 5%-6% with no relief in sight.
This sort of level is highly prohibitive to tech stocks in the short term, therefore, I would believe a repricing would need to take place to balance itself out.
In all honestly, tech needs a break and this appears as if it is the trigger to cool down tech stocks which have been on a pulsating trend to the upside in 2023.
Ultimately, I would describe the downgrade as inevitable. The rising (and accelerating) deficit begs the question of fiscal amateurism.
Congress has been behaving as if unlimited dollar binge spending has no consequence.
Furthermore, we can kiss smaller tech companies tapping the debt market goodbye.
Conditions keep tightening in tech and it’s becoming harder to thread the needle for the unknown quantity.
I would stick with investments in known quantities with strong balance sheets, as they will perform better in a spiking bond yield scenario.
Reload the ammo to buy the dip on those guys.
U.S. Congress is now on call to reign in the massive fiscal deficits or face yet another downgrade and even higher interest payments on federal bonds.
That would be materially negative for tech stocks in the medium term.
