Mad Hedge Technology Alerts!
NO LANDING!
That’s where we are at and that’s what we face as tech stocks need to overcome the “no landing” scenario to see better days in valuation.
There has been much chit-chat about what sort of recession the US economy will face in 2023.
Well, hold your horses there mister.
The smattering of positive labor data means there might not be a recession at all, which translates into neither a soft landing nor a hand landing for the economy.
Why does that matter for tech stocks?
The lack of light or deep recession has absolutely everything to do with inflation. High inflation kills growth stocks!
The logic behind this goes that if there is no recession, US workers will by and large keep their jobs.
From a societal point of view, this is great for Americans who can bank their salaries and spend, spend, spend.
However, this doesn’t work out so great if the stock market needs lower inflation for tech shares to go higher.
Let me just insert here that I am totally aware of all the tech job losses and they have topped around 200,000 so far and it’s a drop in the bucket to overall hiring and firing.
Interestingly enough, tech layoffs haven’t always resulted in the fired getting better jobs.
The jobs report shows a massive uptick in hiring particularly for restaurant jobs, retail, and hospitality.
Many of these are also part-time jobs which means the median US job is decreasing in quality and stability.
The result of more hiring for longer is that the US Central Bank might be forced to jack up rates again past the 5% that is priced in.
This is horrible news for the tech sector as the Nasdaq got off to a blistering start in January because of the clear path to lower inflation. This path is starting to close.
Last Friday’s January employment report saw the economy add a much stronger-than-expected 517,000 jobs, while the unemployment rate fell to 3.4%, its lowest level since 1969.
And if the services sector needs to fill hundreds of thousands of jobs, wage gains will threaten to make inflation spike yet again.
The reopening of China’s economy as reverses lockdowns could push commodity prices back to the upside, also contributing to price pressures after several months of slowing inflation readings.
The Fed has always pinpointed strong wage growth and full employment as an impediment to lowering rates.
I have banged on constantly that the Fed hasn’t done enough with lifting rates even though the pace of rate hikes has been historic.
Readers should remember that the amount of stimulus and handouts during the lockdowns were also historic as well.
Demand destruction simply will not occur if real rates are negative and that’s been the case for quite a while I might add.
Now there is a real risk of inflation reaccelerating because the Fed never raised rates high enough for companies to feel pain and fire employees.
This is why tech stocks have been swooning the last few days and the trading environment is still highly complex.
Expect whipsaws for the foreseeable future and if inflation does come back reincarnated, expect a page out of the 2022 playbook with stocks and bonds going decisively lower.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
February 8, 2023
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(CHATBOT SINKS STOCK 8%)
(GOOGL), (MSFT)
Down 8% on a faulty chatbot conversation – that’s what happened to Google’s (GOOGL) stock today.
That’s why we need to pare back the euphoria and nonstop celebration of ChatGPT.
Hold your horses.
It’s an emerging technology and could end up with chatbots chatting with other chatbots for little or no value.
My point is that it can still go very wrong from here.
Google’s stock swan dived on Wednesday after its own iteration of A.I. chatbot erroneously answered a question about the first usage of space telescopes via its promotional material.
It all lends itself to surmise that Google is way behind in this game and Microsoft has the situation by the scruff of the neck.
Only just a few days ago, Microsoft integrated the AI technology into the front page of its Bing search engine, and is available for user downloads on the Bing app.
The drop in share price meant that Google lost more than $100 billion off its market cap.
The service called Bard is to compete with the popular ChatGPT.
Despite the chatbot’s claim in the ad, NASA reports that the first photo of a planet outside the Milky Way was taken by the Very Large Telescope in 2004 — nearly 19 years before NASA’s Webb telescope.
Unpreparedness by Google could translate into a significant loss of ad revenue for Google’s cash cow Google search.
The desperation of throwing Bard out there not on their timeline could mean they are exposing a product that isn’t up to Google’s standards.
An AI chatbot that consistently delivers false answers will turn off an advertiser quicker than no AI chatbot.
Investing in Google is still worth it even if it takes time to correct the quality of their AI. because it is logical to give a good company the benefit of the doubt.
Another problem is that Google could be stuck with bad AI for a few years before it turns the corner.
For better or worse, they were forced to go public with whatever they had just for the optics of competition even if they are badly lagging behind.
The worst-case scenario is receiving a direct blow to the cranium in terms of total ad revenue.
Google is still relying on search to drive the rest of its business.
They earned over $200 billion in ad revenue in 2021.
This is the first threat to Google’s search model in a generation and the threat has them on their toes.
I do believe they possess the resources to solve this issue.
No doubt that Google CEO Sundar Pichai is throwing the kitchen sink to find and poach the best AI engineers to beef up the chatbot team.
Ultimately, the real new world of higher interest rates and high inflation environment means that your father’s tech playbook must be thrown out the window.
It’s quite evident that we are in the midst of a paradigm shift and new leaders during this shift will emerge.
History shows us that tech leaders of old have a habit of falling behind because they are too set in their ways to adapt to a world with new rules.
It might be so that at some point in the not-so-near future, we might need to set the search default to Bing.
How ironic?
