Mad Hedge Technology Alerts!
The future is here.
No code or low code will bring a raft of new innovative tech companies to market, and we are in the early innings of this transformative development.
What is no code?
No-code is an approach to designing and using applications that requires zero coding or knowledge of programming languages.
This type of software hits us at a perfect time when the home office is beginning to become ubiquitous.
The self-service movement that empowers business users will support the creation, manipulation, and employment of data-driven applications.
If we turn back the pages of history, companies need an army of software programmers to develop even the measliest application.
That was then and this is now.
Fast forward to today and automated technology doesn’t only include cutting-edge industries like automotive cars, but also software on laptops that can be rejigged by individual entrepreneurs.
That’s right, one person with no coding experience will be able to design, develop, and offer a real-life application with meaningful business value without the help of expert programmers.
The research data backs up my thesis with research firms projecting a 23% increase in the global market for this type of technology.
During the pandemic, low-code/no-code tools saw steady growth due to their effectiveness in addressing some of tech’s most complicated challenges.
The essential need to digitize workflows and enhance customer and employee experiences will be a boost to the efficiency of commercial and operational teams.
No-code platforms have evolved from just facilitating mundane tasks to making it possible for a broader range of business employees to truly own their automation and build new software applications with no coding while increasing organizational capacity.
A few risks that larger companies might consider is that even for remote developers building new applications, governance is paramount.
IT staff will need to install guardrails and have those built into low-code/no-code platforms to maintain consistent levels of security across the organization.
Cybersecurity solutions need to be integrated into this workflow by training every employee at the organization on security behavior and using compartmentalization and limited access to prevent opportunities for mistakes.
Hard landings are hard to recover from and some can be crippling to the business model.
For no-code companies, harmonizing workflows is a key requirement for success.
In a low-code/no-code organization, departments should be able to work without silos and communicate freely across functions.
Elevated performance enabled by low-code/no-code tools will mean that the number of useful apps hurling toward the marketplace will be more and merrier than ever before.
Higher performance will no doubt usher in a new renaissance of efficiency and even better performance.
This also puts a 3 or even 4-day workweek squarely in play.
Many of the best tech minds in the world have supported the concept of working smarter instead of working harder.
A low code/no-code standard will allow for these achievements to take place.
The cratering of costs to start and run a tech firm is affected too.
Deploying startup capital to pay for other expenses will make it easier for successful incubation.
This will ultimately mean that this new type of tech company will need to embrace the fusion of IT and business staff, empowering them with composable applications to speed up the time to market for new solutions.
Low-code/no-code, APIs, and other tools are enabling companies to integrate new applications into their existing tech stack in a more seamless manner with a lift-and-shift approach vs. a rip-and-replace.
At the entrepreneur level, individuals will be able to harness the technology to build $100 million companies with a snap of the fingers when it wasn’t possible to do it before.
This is finally a chance for the little guy to recapture their moxie in the vast and sometimes overwhelming business world.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
July 22, 2024
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE EV CONUNDRUM)
(TSLA), (RIVN), (TOYOTA)
Sometimes tech trends start and stop and then start again.
It certainly feels that way for the EV industry when the Chairman of Toyota Akio Toyoda threw a damp towel on the progress of EVs taking over the world.
The Japanese Chairman told the world that he thought EVs would never account for more than a third of the market and that consumers should not be forced to buy them.
These ideas definitely go against the grain of the liberal democratic order.
Listen to the bureaucrats in Brussels and the left-wing establishment in Washington and it almost seems as if they want to ban oil and gas products.
Of course, the ban is certainly hyperbole, but the green movement towards lithium battery-powered cars has become quite political and partisan.
Akio Toyoda, chairman of the world’s biggest carmaker by sales, said that electric vehicles (EVs) should not be developed to the exclusion of other technologies such as the hybrid and hydrogen-powered cars that his company has focused on.
He said he believed battery EVs will only secure a maximum of 30% of the market – less than double their current share in the UK – with the remaining 70% taken by fuel cell EVs, hybrids, and hydrogen cars.
Mr. Toyoda argued that electric cars’ appeal is limited because one billion people in the world still live without electricity, while they are also expensive and need charging infrastructure to operate.
The chairman also pointed to Toyota’s recent announcement that it was working on a new combustion engine, saying it was important to give engine factory workers a role in the green transition.
Koji Sato, the car maker’s chief executive, last year promised Toyota would sell 1.5 million battery EVs a year by 2026, and 3.5 million by 2030.
Tesla, the world’s biggest EV producer on an annual basis, reported 1.8 million deliveries last year.
Mr. Toyoda’s two cents come after electric car sales have slowed in the Western world slowed in 2024.
I am of the notion that in the short term, all the low-hanging fruit has been plucked by the EV buyers.
To find the next incremental buyer, it won’t be impossible, but that same type of excitement won’t exist.
The truth is that many consumers are still tied to the combustible engine.
On a recent trip to Japan, almost no local drove an EV and I witnessed almost no charging points.
If one of the biggest economies in the world isn’t convinced, then there is still a lot of work to do and I don’t believe that the Japanese will give up gas-powered engines so quickly.
In the short term, the demand weakness in EVs bodes ill for EV stocks like Tesla or Rivian.
Throw in the fact that EVs aren’t cheap and the cost of living crisis is forcing consumers to migrate to necessities which unfortunately doesn’t include a brand new Tesla.
Stay away from EV stocks in the short term and pile into the AI narrative.
