Come join me for lunch at the Mad Hedge Fund Trader?s Global Strategy Update, which I will be conducting in Incline Village, Nevada on Friday, October 23, 2015.
An excellent meal will be followed by a wide-ranging discussion and an extended question and answer period.
I?ll be giving you my up to date view on stocks, bonds, currencies, commodities, precious metals, and real estate. And to keep you in suspense, I?ll be throwing a few surprises out there too. Tickets are available for $198.
I?ll be arriving at 11:30 and leaving late in case anyone wants to have a one on one discussion, or just sit around and chew the fat about the financial markets.
The lunch will be held at the premier restaurant in Incline Village, Nevada on the sparkling shores of Lake Tahoe. Those who live there already know what it is. The precise location will be emailed with your purchase confirmation.
I look forward to meeting you, and thank you for supporting my research.
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Lake-Tahoe-View-e1410283987626.jpg241400Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2015-10-20 01:08:402015-10-20 01:08:40SOLD OUT Friday, October 23, 2015 Incline Village, Nevada Global Strategy Luncheon
You would never guess Dr. Ben Bernanke was once one of the most powerful men in the world, indeed in all of human history.
There he sat across the table from me in a popular San Francisco Italian restaurant wearing a poorly made grey suit and a cheap pair of shoes, with rubber soles.
Only the occasional interruption from an autograph seeker belied his true importance.
I managed to snare Ben for a couple of hours on his national book tour promoting his just released "The Courage to Act." Out only days, it was already at the top of the New York Times Best Seller list.
Ben is a different guy now. For a start, you can now call him "Ben" instead of "Governor."
Remember those carefully parsed, measured, and deliberate words he used to use to explain Federal Reserve monetary policy and his future intentions? That guy is long gone.
The new Ben is funny, in a subtle, but wickedly clever manner. He is also instructional, thoughtful, even professorial. At the end of the day, Ben Bernanke is now your favorite faculty member.
Ben's big revelation to me was that there were no potential triggers out there for another 2008-09 type financial crisis.
American banks have been recapitalized to the extent that they now have a stronger safety net with which to weather any future volatility. US banks are bigger than ever.
The big global concern right now is with emerging markets, where trillions of dollars worth of US dollar-denominated debt have been borrowed, collateralized by depreciating local currencies.
Another worry is the perceived "Fed put," which is allowing investors to get complacent with their risk-taking.
Bernanke believes that rising income inequality is the biggest structural problem we face. It means that not all are benefiting from an improving economy, a goal of Fed policy.
This has been unfolding for 40 years, and won't be solved in a day, as several presidential candidates are promising.
As a result, the "Horatio Alger" effect, whereby the poorest can rise to success through brains, hard work, and thrift, is now much less likely to occur than in the past.
Bernanke himself is a perfect example of that phenomenon.
Ben and I spoke at length about the dark days of the crash, and he remembered the emails I used to pepper his staff with proposing fixes or patches on an almost daily basis.
Regulation dating from the 1930s had become outmoded and was woefully out of touch with modern-day finance. It was far too lax in the run-up to the crisis.
For example, insurance giant AIG was monitored by the Office of Thrift Supervision, which was utterly clueless when it came to pricing mathematically complex derivatives.
Bernanke warned President Bush as early as 2005 that real estate prices were getting too high and that a crash was coming.
His predecessor, Alan Greenspan, had cautioned during the 1990s that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had a flawed business model that would eventually blow up and take down the financial system with it.
In the end, every major financial institution was tottering on the edge.
Bernanke had the benefit of completing his Ph.D. thesis on the causes and mistakes of the Great Depression, once an arcane area of economic study.
Thanks to the laissez-faire philosophy of the 1920s, the Fed let the money supply collapse, and one-third of all banks went under, some 8,000 in total. This froze the entire credit system.
Eight decades later, Ben, therefore, saw the answer to another looming depression in an inflated money supply, which we saw with QE 1, 2, 3, and 4.
He also helped engineer the $700 billion TARP that bailed out the 20 biggest banks, which he described as "the most successful, but most hated government policy in history."
When it was wound down, the US Treasury made a $15.3 billion profit on the program.
Part of the problem in selling the TARP, and later, President Obama's 2009 $831 billion stimulus budget, was that while the crisis started in New York and Washington, it was slow to reach the hinterlands.
One Republican congressman in Iowa called local car dealers in his district and asked what the big deal was. Ben said, "Just wait," and General Motors filed for bankruptcy months later.
I asked Ben who was his favorite president, as he was appointed by both George W. Bush and Barack Obama. He confirmed that he liked working for the two men, but that Bush was the natural practical joker.
When Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors, Bernanke was required to give a weekly briefing on the state of the economy. Once he committed the grievous sartorial error of wearing tan socks with his trademark grey suit.
Bush complained, stating that the White House had dress standards to maintain.
Bernanke answered that he thought the Bush administration was one of fiscal responsibility, and that he had bought a four-pack of the controversial socks at the Gap for only $10.
When Ben attended the next meeting a week later, he wore the required grey socks with his grey suit. He couldn't help but notice that everyone else at the meeting was wearing tan socks with their navy suits, including the president.
When Bush met Bernanke to discuss his appointment as Chairman of the Federal Reserve in 2006, he asked if he had any political experience.
Bernanke replied that he had served two terms on the Montgomery County, Maryland Board of Education. Bush said, "that was fine."
Bernanke is an extremely intelligent man. You can almost hear the wheels whirring when he is thinking.
I asked him my "gotcha" question.
Wasn't quantitative easing just a means of bridging the demographic chasm of the 2010s, when 85 million baby boomers are retiring? Isn't it just a way to pull growth forward from the 2020s?
He paused for a moment, and then changed the subject.
Finally, I had to ask if Bernanke ever got a chance to read The Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader while Fed Chairman. He diplomatically responded that the "Fed takes great pains to take in all views."
To buy "The Courage to Act" at discount Amazon pricing, please click here.
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Bernanke-The-Courage-to-Act-e1445182316976.jpg400269Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2015-10-19 01:06:452020-03-26 14:44:55Dinner with Ben Bernanke
Featured Trade: (OCTOBER 21 GLOBAL STRATEGY WEBINAR), (FRIDAY, OCTOBER 23 INCLINE VILLAGE, NEVADA STRATEGY LUNCHEON), (THE FINAL WORD ON THE TAX ?WASH SALE RULE?), (TESTIMONIAL)
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2015-10-16 01:10:332015-10-16 01:10:33October 16, 2015
Readers who attend my Global Strategy Luncheons always ask me to be careful when pursuing my many adventures around the world.
After all, they would hate to lose their favorite source of trading and investment advice if I fell to my death in a mountain climbing tragedy, froze to death in an avalanche, or crashed my plane while flying upside down.
So what do I do when I returned from my Portland, Oregon lunch? Deep into a ten-mile night hike on nearby Grizzly Peak, I STEPPED ON A LIVE RATTLESNAKE!
Yikes!
Of course, I danced away as fast as I could, at least to the extent that you can dance with a 50-pound backpack.
When he coiled up and rattled at me, I took off poste haste, but not before taking a picture with my iPhone, held at arms length (see below).
That was one pissed reptile!
The bears who got caught in this month?s ferocious short squeeze may be feeling similarly snake bit.
From feast to famine.
After knocking out a head spinning 40 Trade Alerts in September, we have fallen in to a Trade Alert famine in October.
Bringing in a blockbuster 12% profit last month, we are now posting negative numbers for the month.
Markets have suddenly gone strangely silent.
Is this the calm before the next storm?
That?s a definite maybe.
Got to love that (XIV), the Velocity Shares Daily Inverse VIX Short Term ETN. We have pulled off four round trips in the short volatility fund, all of them profitable.
Volatility had to go down, lest half of Wall Street drop dead from the stress.
Every Volatility Index (VIX) spike from here on is to be sold into with both hands. I think we are going to see the (VIX) trading between $12-$22 for almost all of the next year.
The $30 handles in the (VIX) are to be seen no more.
In addition, we simply ran out of crises.
The global political scene has calmed down. China quit crashing. Oil and commodities may have finally found a bottom.
So investors and traders have stopped being so negative. But they haven?t become positive either. Hence the pause for Q3 earnings to come out as the pitiful excuse to do nothing.
When we get the all clear signal, I expect the S&P 500 to take a run at a new all time high by the end of 2015. After all, that?s only 7% north from here.
With November the largest corporate stock buy back of the year, underperforming managers desperately chasing returns, commodities getting a new lease on life, and interest rates remaining low as far as the eye can see, it couldn?t go any other way.
But just to be sure, I?ll ask former Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke when I have dinner with him tonight.
No kidding!
A new high willnot happen by November 20, hence the logic behind the S&P 500 SPDR?s (SPY) November, 2015 $207-$210 in-the-money vertical bear put spread.
I think the (SPY) 200-day moving average is going to present prodigious upside resistance the first several times around.
And if the market retests the August and September lows one more time, giving us our final fright of the year, so much the better.
Isn?t Halloween coming soon?
The market has just enjoyed a short covering rally for the ages, up 9 out of the last 11 days. It is waaaaay overbought.
Oh, and by the way, I just received an invitation to climb Mt. Whitney next year, at 14,510 feet the highest fountain in the continental United States, in the run up to my 65th birthday.
Damn the rattlesnakes, and don?t forget the Champaign!
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Rattlesnake.jpg352415Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2015-10-15 01:07:152015-10-15 01:07:15My Stock Market Call for the Rest of 2015
With the spectacular collapse in oil prices (USO), down a whopping 63% in just 18 months, I am starting to get a lot of emails from followers looking for Trade Alerts to buy the energy companies.
After all, energy is one of my three core industries in which to invest over the next two decades. Why not now?
The short answer is: Not quite yet. Don?t ever confuse a stock that has gone down a lot with ?cheap.?
The share prices for this sector are getting so low, they are starting to redefine the meaning of ?bargain.?
The major integrated oil companies are now trading under book value with single digit multiples.
However, I have seen this situation a half dozen times this year. Short-term speculative traders sense a market bottom and pile in, even though oil industry fundamentals continue to worsen.
It always ends in tears.
It is the classic ?catching a falling knife? scenario. If I were inclined to play this game, I would be broke by now, and wouldn't have any fingers left.
Energy stocks are now at liquidation values, assuming that the fall in the price of Texas tea halts at $38. Those are valuations almost as low as Apple (AAPL) saw a year ago.
The absence of my Trade Alerts in this fertile field is happening because things could get worse for oil before they get better.
There is now a war for market share occurring between the world?s second and third largest producers, Saudi Arabia and Russia (the US is now number one), which has yet to play out.
Both countries desperately depend on rising prices and export volumes to maintain domestic political stability. When that doesn?t happen, budget deficits explode, spending gets cut to the bone, revolutions occur, and governments fall.
And these aren?t countries that send former leaders to country clubs to practice their golf swings in retirement. Firing squads are more the order of the day.
In fact, countries maintaining high oil revenues is a matter of personal survival for their leaders.
Until recently, I would have said that China would step in and put a floor under the market to fuel their insatiable demand for energy. But they have run out of storage, and are unable to take more.
There is just no place to put it. They have even resorted to long-term charters of ultra large tankers, like the 434,000 tonne TI Europe, purely to build reserves.
The shake out is especially bad in the offshore sector, the planet?s most expensive source of crude.
A glut of new drilling rigs is about to hit the market, ordered during more prosperous times years ago, while existing ones can be snapped up for 60 cents on the dollar.
Oil suffers from the additional damnation in that it is being dragged down by the global commodity collapse. Unless an asset class is made out of paper and pays an interest rate or a dividend, it is getting dissed to an unbelievable degree.
All of this means that the price of oil could fall further before we hit bottom and bounce.
If you had told me when I was fracking for natural gas in the Barnett Shale 15 years ago that this process would ultimately cause the collapse of Russia and Saudi Arabia, me and my roustabout buddies would have said you were nuts.
Yet, that is precisely what seems to be happening.
If there is one thing saving Texas tea, it is that the US can?t build energy infrastructure fast enough to get burgeoning new supplies to market.
After the Keystone Pipeline got stalled by regulatory roadblocks, giant 100 car oil trains sprang out of nowhere overnight.
So many railcars have been diverted to the oil trade that farmers are now having trouble getting a record grain crop to market.
This is why railroads have been booming (click here for ?Will the Oil Bust Kill the Railroads??).
The energy research house, Raymond James, recently put out an estimate that domestic American oil production (USO) would rise to 9.1 million barrels a day by the end of 2015.
That means its share of total consumption will leap to 46% of our total 20 million barrels a day habit. These are game changing numbers.
Names like the Eagle Ford Shale, Haynesville Shale, and the Bakken Shale, once obscure references on geological maps, are now a major force in the country?s energy picture.
Ten years ago, North Dakota was suffering from depopulation. Now, itinerant oil workers must brave -40 degree winter temperatures in their recreational vehicles pursuing their $150,000 a year jobs.
The value of this extra 3.5 million barrels/day works out to $115 billion a year at current prices (3.5 million X 365 X $90). That will drop America?s trade deficit by nearly 25% over the next three years, and almost wipe out our current account deficit.
Needless to say, this is a hugely dollar positive development, and my own Trade Alerts have profitably been reflecting that.
This 3.5 million barrels will also offset much of the growth in China?s oil demand for the next three years. Fewer oil exports to the US also vastly expand the standby production capacity of Saudi Arabia.
If you want proof of the impact this will have on the economy, look no further that the coal (KOL), which has been falling in a rising market.
Power plant conversion from coal to natural gas (UNG) is accelerating at a dramatic pace. That leaves China as the remaining buyer, and their economy is slowing.
It all makes the current price of oil at $50 look a little rich. As with the last oil spike four years ago, this one is occurring in the face of a supply glut.
Cushing, Oklahoma is awash in Texas tea, and the Strategic Petroleum Reserve stashed away in salt domes in Texas and Louisiana is at its maximum capacity of 727 million barrels.
It was concerns about war with Syria, Iran, ISIL, and the Ukraine that took prices to $107 in the spring. My oil industry friends tell me this fear premium added $30-$40 to the price of crude. That premium is now gone.
It seems that every time a new group grabs an oil field in the Middle East, they ramp up production, rather than destroy it, so they can milk it for the cash.
This is why 15 tankers are afloat around the world carrying Kurdish crude to sell on the black market.
Once Europe and Asia return to a solid growth track, oil will recover to $70 a barrel or more.
Until then, discretion is the better part of valor, and I?ll be sitting on those Trade Alerts.
It is also why I am keeping oil companies with major onshore domestic assets, like Exxon Mobile (XOM) and Occidental Petroleum (OXY), in my long-term model portfolio click here to view.
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Ship-e1444664381379.jpg264400Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2015-10-13 01:07:422015-10-13 01:07:42Is the Bear Market in Oil Over?
?If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in five years there'd be a shortage of sand,? said Nobel Prize winning economist, Milton Friedman
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Sahara-Desert-marching-e1444661844617.jpg194300Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2015-10-13 01:05:092015-10-13 01:05:09October 13, 2015 - Quote of the Day
Legal Disclaimer
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.