What would happen if I recommended a stock that had no profits, was cash flow negative, and had a net worth of negative $44 trillion? Chances are, you would cancel your subscription, demand a refund, de-friend me from you Facebook account, and delete my email address from your address book.

Yet that is precisely what my former colleague at Morgan Stanley did, technology guru Mary Meeker. Now a partner at venture capital giant Kleiner Perkins, Mary has brought her formidable analytical talents to bear on analyzing the United States of America as a stand alone corporation. The bottom line: the challenges are so great they would daunt the best turnaround expert. But our problems are not hopeless or unsolvable.

The US government was a miniscule affair until the Great Depression and WWII, when it exploded in size. Since 1965 when Lyndon Johnson?s ?Great Society? began, GDP rose by 2.7 times, while entitlement spending leapt by 11.1 times. If current trends continue, the Congressional Budget Office says that entitlements and interest payments will exceed all federal revenues by 2025.

Of course, the biggest problem is with health care spending, which will see no solution until health care costs are somehow capped. Despite spending more than any other nation, we get one of the worst results, with lagging quality of life, life spans, and infant mortality. Some 28% of Medicare spending is devoted to a recipient?s final year of life. Somewhere, there are emergency room cardiologists making a fortune off of this.

Social Security is an easier fix. Since it started in 1935, life expectancy has risen by 26% to 78, while the retirement age is up only 3% to 68. Any reforms have to involve raising the retirement age to at least 70, and means testing recipients.

The solutions to our other problems are simple, but require political suicide for those making the case. For example, you could eliminate all tax deductions, including those for home mortgage deductions, charitable contributions, IRA contributions, dependents, and medical expenses, and raise $1 trillion a year. That would wipe out the current budget deficit in one fell swoop.

Mary reminds us that government spending on technology laid the foundations of our modern economy. If the old ARPNET had not been funded during the sixties, Google, Yahoo, EBay, Facebook, Cisco, and Oracle would be missing today. Global Positioning Systems (GPS) was also invented by and is still run by the government and has been another great wellspring of profits.

There are a few gaping holes in Mary?s ?thought experiment?. I doubt she knows that the Treasury Department carries the value of America?s gold reserves, the world?s largest at 8,965 tons worth $414 billion, at only $32 an ounce, versus an actual market price of $1,445.

Nor is she aware that our ten aircraft carriers are valued at $1 each, against an actual cost of $5 billion in today?s dollars. And what is Yosemite worth on the open market, or Yellowstone, or the Grand Canyon? These all render her net worth calculations meaningless.

Mary expounds at length on her analysis, in her book entitled USA Inc. which you can buy at Amazon by clicking on the title or the book cover below.

Worth More Than a Dollar?

How About $32 an Ounce?

No matter what anyone promises you today, this week, or this year, your taxes are going up. I don?t care if you are still licking your wounds from the January 1 payroll tax rise, or the federal tax hike for millionaires, which in my case took my rate up from 35% to 39.6%. At least the capital gains tax is still a steal at 20%.

At $1.3 trillion, the budget deficit is so enormous that bringing it into balance merely through spending cuts is a mathematical impossibility. Chopping funding for Planned Parenthood and National Public Radio just isn?t going to do it.

If you own your own home, work for a large company, save for your retirement, earn money from capital gains, and toss in a check when they pass the dish around at church every Sunday, you are the biggest beneficiary of the current tax system. Therefore, you are about to take a big hit. Check out the target list below, and the tax revenues the death of these tax breaks will raise:

$264 billion- Should those without health care subsidize those who receive it for free from their employers? This is the amount raised by taxing company provided health insurance as regular income. Think large banks and oil companies.

$100 billion- Should renters be subsidizing homeowners? Kiss that home mortgage interest deduction on loans under $1 million goodbye. Ditto for the real estate market as a whole. The more aggressive version of this has the ceiling on deductions dropping to $500,000.

$100 billion- End the tax deductibility of charitable contributions. Should those who don?t go to church subsidize those who do? Universities, churches, and political fund raising go begging.

$52 billion- Should those without savings subsidize those salting away money for retirement. This is the argument that will be made to end tax deductibility of 401k contributions.

$39 billion- Savings on taxes exempted by the step up in the cost bases for investments inherited by surviving spouses. She doesn?t need that McMansion anyway.

$36 billion- Tax capital gains as regular income. This won?t affect you if you never sell and let your heirs sort out the mess.

$31 billion- Stop special tax treatment of dividend incomes.

Please note that these most draconian measures only raise $586 billion a year, a mere 45% of last year?s deficit. Without raising tax rates, the remaining $714 billion will have to come from cutting Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and Defense spending. In any case, I think it will be politically impossible to get any of these changes through the current congress. An energy tax and a national value added tax are also on the table.

None of these hikes would be necessary if the economy grew at a 4% real rate instead of 3%. This is why tax rates in emerging countries are so low. But I believe that America?s long-term growth rate is falling, not rising, and that our budget problems are going to get worse, not better. What happens if interest rates rise for the world?s largest borrower? Oops.

Of course, we could adopt Mary Meeker?s suggestion in her paper on USA, Inc. and eliminate all deductions, raising about $1 trillion a year. That would involve shrinking the Internal Revenue Code from the current 71,000 pages to a single page, and moving to a flat tax system. The mass unemployment of one million CPA?s and 106,000 internal revenue agents alone would be worth the price.