Mad Hedge Biotech and Healthcare Letter
September 6, 2022
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(ONLY FOOLS RUSH IN)
(APDN), (RVPH), (NERV), (JNJ), (BMY), (AZN), (LLY), (PFE)
Tag Archive for: (APDN)
Following a promising first half of 2022, it looks like the markets are taking an about turn as more and more investors start dumping their stocks.
The seemingly recovering Nasdaq Composite showed a 4.3% decline last month despite reporting its best record since 2020 just last July.
Nevertheless, several biotech names appear to have avoided the crash thanks to some exciting company-specific updates.
The top gainers so far include Apple DNA Sciences (APDN), which skyrocketed 340% by the end of August. Among the projects in its pipeline, the most promising to date is its monkeypox virus test.
Another name on the list is Reviva Pharmaceuticals Holdings (RVPH). This clinical-stage biopharmaceutical firm reported a whopping 244% gain during its second-quarter earnings report.
However, the top gainer that has been on the news lately is Minerva Neurosciences (NERV). This budding biopharmaceutical company gained 321%, according to its report last month.
Minerva Neurosciences isn’t a name I have kept track of nor even heard of until these past months when its wild upswing started to make me curious.
The company started attracting attention when billionaire Steve Cohen of Point72 Asset Management fame invested in it. This move saw Minerva Neurosciences’ shares soar to more than 70% at that time.
Just before August wrapped up, the company filed for its long-delayed schizophrenia treatment, Roluperidone.
Entering the neuroscience industry is a clever move, especially with the potential of this segment. In 2021, this market was estimated to be worth $32.22 billion. By 2027, the neuroscience segment is projected to reach $41.24 billion.
As for schizophrenia, roughly 1% of the entire population is affected by this disease. Based on recent WHO reports, more than 24 million individuals are suffering from schizophrenia annually.
In 2021, the global schizophrenia drug market was reported to cost $8.02 billion. Taking into consideration the changes in the environment and living conditions, the number is expected to go higher as the years pass. With these in mind, the estimated worth of this market is expected to reach $10.15 billion by 2027.
Minerva Neurosciences wouldn’t be the first to take interest in the schizophrenia segment. Prior to this biopharma’s entry, there have already been a handful of key players attempting to be hailed as the leader of this sector.
The names include Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY), AstraZeneca (AZN), Eli Lilly (LLY), and Pfizer (PFE).
However, only Minerva Neurosciences specifically targets the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. That makes the company stand out in this steadily growing segment.
Given that Minerva Neurosciences is cheaper than these stocks, would it then be wise to buy shares from the smaller company to gain entry into the neuroscience market?
At this point, Minerva Neurosciences has yet to prove that it’s more than just a one-trick pony. In fact, the company has not even sufficiently shown that it has mastered its single trick.
When looking at the potential of any biotechnology and healthcare company, I generally begin by checking out its pipeline.
For Minerva Neurosciences, the list does not look sustainable.
The company’s MIN-301 for Parkinson’s Disease remains inconsequential since it’s still in the preclinical trial stage.
Prior to this, Minerva Neurosciences worked with JNJ to develop treatments for insomnia and major depressive disorder. However, those have yet to yield tangible results that can move the needle for the company’s share price.
That means Minerva Neurosciences is all about Roluperidone. While the company is moving as fast as it could to launch the product to market, more questions remain than answers.
Actually, the company seems to have eliminated earnings conference calls. These could have been useful in offering a more accurate picture of its future, but it looks like investors will need to make do with whatever information is published.
Admittedly, exciting times could very well be waiting for Minerva Neurosciences’ shareholders. The recent progress with Roluperidone most likely offered them some relief.
No doubt that the optimistic investors are hoping that the 321% gain would signify another incredible run in the following weeks. However, this might not be likely. In fact, a pullback seems to be more in the horizon.
Considering its sparse pipeline and the lingering uncertainty over Roluperidone’s performance, this might not be the best time to buy Minerva Neurosciences’ shares.
Global Market Comments
March 31, 2020
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(MORE PLAYERS ENTER THE RACE FOR A CORONA CURE)
(MRNA), (ARCT), (JNJ), (SNY), (GOVX), (ALT), (NVAX), (GSK), (GNBT), (VXL.V), (INO), (APDN), (CADILAHC)
Mad Hedge Biotech & Healthcare Letter
March 31, 2020
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(MORE PLAYERS ENTER THE RACE FOR A CORONA CURE)
(MRNA), (ARCT), (JNJ), (SNY), (GOVX), (ALT), (NVAX), (GSK), (GNBT), (VXL.V), (INO), (APDN), (CADILAHC)
Special issue on COVID-19 vaccines: Moderna Inc (MRNA), Arcturus (ARCT), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), Sanofi (SNY), GeoVax (GOVX), Altimmune (ALT), Novavax (NVAX), GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Generex (GNBT), Vaxil Bio (VXL.V), Inovio Pharmaceuticals (INO), Applied DNA Sciences (APDN), Zydus Cadila (CADILAHC)
The hunt is definitely underway for potential treatments to fight COVID-19 but coming up with vaccines will take a much longer time.
Since we already have the genetic code of the novel coronavirus (click here for the link), researchers can now use the complete blueprint to come up with ways to defeat this disease.
With code in hand, it takes a supercomputer just three hours to create model vaccines. Then it is just a question of how fast you can make them, if at all. Many proposed models are far beyond our existing technology.
To date, there are roughly 35 companies and academic organizations actively seeking ways to come up with a COVID-19 vaccine. While the process will still take time, there are several promising prospects.
Among the companies working on this, Moderna Inc (MRNA) has been recognized as the first biotechnology company to conduct human trials to test its COVID-19 vaccine in March. The trial includes 45 males and non-pregnant females aged 18 to 55.
Moderna’s vaccine utilizes the genetic sequence of the novel coronavirus. Basically, the goal is to build a vaccine out of messenger RNA.
Aside from Moderna, another biotech company called Curevac has been at the forefront of this cutting-edge technology.
In China, RNACure Biopharma has been working with Fudan University and Shanghai JiaoTong University on using the same technique to come up with a vaccine as well.
China’s CDC along with Tongji University and Stermina as well as Duke-NUS in partnership with Arcturus (ARCT) are also using a similar approach.
Although Moderna’s vaccine reached Phase 1 in record time, authorities cautioned that the development time frame is somewhere between 12 and 18 months — and this is even dubbed as an “overly optimistic” timeline.
Meanwhile, there are companies like Sanofi Pasteur (SNY) elected to use previously deployed vaccine platforms in earlier epidemics like SARS.
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) also decided to employ the same strategy using its Ebola vaccine platform. In fact, JNJ shared that it’ll be ready to conduct human testing of its non-replicating viral vector by November.
Aside from JNJ, another biotechnology company in China called CanSino Biologics (HKG: 6185) in collaboration with the Academy of Military Medical Sciences is utilizing the same technology.
Just last week, Chinese authorities approved CanSino’s Phase 1 clinical trials.
Apart from JNJ and CanSino, other biotechnology companies are also working on a vaccine using the same non-replicating viral vector technology.
The list includes Wuhan’s BravoVax along with GeoVax (GOVX), Altimmune (ALT), Vaxart (VXRT), Greffex, and the University of Oxford.
Another strategy is employed by Novavax (NVAX), which is to construct a “recombinant” vaccine.
In a nutshell, this strategy entails extraction of the genetic code for the protein found on the Sars-CoV-2. This is a part of the virus that can trigger the immune system. This will then be pasted into the genome of a bacterium or yeast.
In effect, this vaccine will force the microorganisms to produce huge quantities of the protein to be able to fight off the virus.
Big biotechnology companies like Sanofi and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) are following the same technique.
Smaller firms are also in on the action including Generex Biotechnology Corporation (GNBT), Vaxil Bio (VXL.V), EpiVax, and Clover Biopharmaceuticals.
The University of Georgia, Baylor College of Medicine, and the University of Miami are pursuing the same lead as well.
On top of these, several biotechnology companies use a DNA-based approach to come up with a vaccine.
Last March 12, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation provided a $5 million grant to Pennsylvania-based biotech firm Inovio Pharmaceuticals (INO) to help the company speed up the tests needed for its DNA vaccine called INO-4800.
This is on top of the roughly $9 million in funding it received from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations earlier.
At the moment, INO-4800 is in preclinical studies with plans to push it to Phase 1 clinical trials by April.
Aside from Inovio, Applied DNA Sciences (APDN), Zydus Cadila (CADILAHC), Takis, and Evivax are also pursuing the same strategy.
Despite implementing the most effective and even draconian measures to contain COVID-19, these tactics only managed to slow down the spread of the virus.
With the World Health Organization tagging this situation as a pandemic, everyone has become more desperate in the search for a vaccine because only a vaccine can stop people from getting sick.
However, even the unprecedented speeds afforded, the biotechnology companies couldn’t change the fact that developing a vaccine requires at least a year. It’s crucial to not make mistakes along the way especially since the product could potentially be injected into most of the world’s population.
After all, there’s only a single thing that can be considered worse than a bad virus — and that is a bad vaccine.
