“If you're offered a seat on a rocket ship, don't ask what seat.”- Said Chief Operating Officer of Facebook Sheryl Sandberg
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
August 6, 2021
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(IS IT TIME TO GET BACK INTO UBER?)
(UBER)
I dig it that Uber has larger data sets than anyone else in a world where bigger is better in terms of data.
What they have is ultimately uber valuable in the modern day of data being the new oil.
This advantage is precisely why Uber is able to train an in-house algorithm better than the next guy.
Global reference points are what every company these days lust for.
Matching and routing an incentives marketing engine that is highly personalized is an existential issue for ride-sharing giant Uber.
When you parlay their data edge with possessing op teams on the ground in every single market and understanding of the regulatory marketplace as well, it means per unit, Uber’s overheads are way lighter than competitors.
It all translates into cost of customer acquisition being lower and a higher lifetime value because of the higher frequency accounts that they have with customers.
You could almost say that in this particular industry, it’s a game of who can outdo one another in customer acquisition unit cost.
Beating on cost is a must because Uber has all these unprofitable businesses and when it comes down to it, they are a glorified delivery driving service.
They must acquire to scale out because that’s the only hope they have to become profitable by wielding the economies of scale advantage.
Uber’s Grocery division is off to a great start internationally and at home in the U.S., Instacart is a strong competitor.
So I do believe they face a steep uphill climb to get anywhere near Instacart who has had skin in the game forever.
But when we get into the weeds, Uber’s short-term direction will clearly be driven by the supply of drivers or the lack of them for a reasonable price.
In July, new driver additions on Uber in the U.S. grew 30% month-over-month. That's right, 30% month-over-month even as they pulled back on incentives and improved margins. As investments taper, Uber expect mobility to show strong leverage in the back half.
Management tried to gloss up results but Uber had spent a massive $250m in driver incentive investment in the second quarter, which increased losses at its ride-hail business.
I mentioned at the top that Uber’s model is about low-quality tech married with scale, thus, there’s no way to justify spending $250m in one quarter to find drivers.
The dearth of drivers came about because of incremental government stimulus, lack of child care services, unemployment subsidies, even preventative virus concerns, or simply some drivers just died of corona.
Not only is data the oil for Uber, but in that oil, one massively important input is the cost of acquiring drivers.
For management to be so behind the curve on this one shows a degree of unpreparedness.
Granted, it’s been quite difficult for any tech management to get a hold of the new tech trends post-pandemic, but that’s what they are paid to do.
Shares of Uber have tanked around 30% since mid-February this year speaking volumes to management lack of execution in supplying the volume of drivers.
I know it’s not a simple one-day smash and grab to get drivers.
We are talking about marketing, onboard costs, background checks, vaccinations, promotions, registration process and education.
This isn’t all free.
I would hope that as we approach 2022, those costs become less of a burden.
But it does go to show that for Uber, the honeymoon period is long gone and even the low-hanging fruit area doesn’t exist anymore.
We seem to have entered a phase of chronic underperformance met with a finite period of overperformance the only to shift backwards again and repeat the same cycle over again.
As we look at the rest of 2021, the driver acquisition marketplace is unhealthy and wait times are up big causing surge pricing to make Uber a pricy service.
I don’t see that moving significantly down by end of 2021, but this specific headwind will moderate which is good for the stock.
A little bit more regionally, a bunch of cities, southern cities are actually back to normal and it’s about putting dollars in front of drivers and the top 20 cities, drivers for mobility are making over $40 an active hour, including just earnings and tips as well.
I will tell you - this company has no chance to become profitable if they are doling out a median wage of $40 per hour.
It’s a fool’s game.
Even if you want to get “leaner”, I don’t see where the cost savings will come from unless they want to gut the corporate staff or cut back on the technology.
That’s not to say they will even be able to retain drivers who might get better offers in different industries and never consider driving an Uber again.
I mean honestly, being an Uber driver isn’t exactly a desirable job for most people unless you have no skills or no better options.
Everyone wants to work at home from a desk and computer where they can brew their own coffee and not commute. Being a driver is a job where you are in perpetual commute!
And if less skilled workers are being paid to stay home with an eviction moratorium so they don’t have to pay rent or a mortgage forbearance, so they don’t need to leave home, then it’s gotten so bad that Uber is paying $40 per hour to move the needle.
Regional cities have recovered but driver supply problem is acute in major cities like New York, San Francisco and L.A. with demand continuing to outplay supply and prices and wait times remain above comfort levels.
When this happens, customers stop using your service and for a company that relies on high volume, it couldn’t be more than terrible.
It means Uber doesn’t get paid when people are clamoring for their service.
I just don’t see Uber going into other markets and burning more cash to stay relevant because they are too mature of a company.
They are running out of gunpowder in 2021 and will expect to pump out the profits soon.
To profit means outperformance and Uber hasn’t delivered more than the dead cat bounce of the economy reopening which is a little pitiful.
I made a bullish call earlier this year which was correct at the time but then Uber hit a wall at $65 and has come back down with vengeance.
I can say that at $43 today, the stock will rise if Uber’s management can trim the $40 per hour they are paying drivers today while increasing driver headcount by 30% quarter over quarter.
I believe Uber’s management will be successful at bringing down driver costs.
It’s easy to see how they go down from here, and I do believe that the bad news is priced into Uber shares, and that many of these headwinds were transitory and the outlook will improve moving into 2022.
Even though I forecast the stock going up in the short to midterm, I still believe at some point, the company will need to come to terms with having no cutting-edge technology and no moat around its business model.
That issue has been lying dormant but that doesn’t mean it has gone away.
Just think about it, if Amazon or Google wanted to do what Uber does, they could figure it out in months, but they don’t see any value in this profit model.
Uber is definitely on the clock and that’s not a good thing for their management.
“Desperation sometimes drives innovation.” – Said CEO of Uber Dara Khosrowshahi
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
August 4, 2021
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(FINTECH CONTINUES THE MOMENTUM)
(SQ), (AFTPY)
This guy leading Square, Jack Dorsey, has accomplished some phenomenal things during his tenure in San Francisco.
But with the fast-moving tech sector, he’s venturing into uncharted territory as his outfit purchased Australian buy now, pay later provider Afterpay (AFTPY) for $29 billion in stock.
This is the largest buy-out done by Dorsey signaling a large wager on Square’s ability to catch up with more established retail banks.
Afterpay offers its 16 million users a way to get their purchases right away and pay for it in four regular, interest-free installments.
What a great deal for the poorer Millennial generation!
This is just another tool that Square will be able to integrate on its interface as another way to pull in more users and capital.
It’s almost a credit card proxy.
If payments are missed, Afterpay levies a fee and locks their accounts.
These late-payment penalties, along with fees paid by merchants, form the main sources of revenue for Afterpay. The system is popular among young shoppers who make up the bulk of bad credit scores.
Square’s popular Cash app gets another notch in its belt as it competes with Affirm and Klarna.
A secret meeting in Hawaii consummated the deal with executives reasoning that speed is paramount - banks and new entrants are aiming for a bigger piece of the buy now, and pay later services.
These offerings have boomed in the past year, as homebound consumers used them to borrow and spend online during the coronavirus pandemic.
There are reports that Apple is in the process of building a buy now, pay later feature in coordination with Goldman Sachs.
These services usually mean up to a few thousand dollars, which can be paid off interest-free.
That means such providers are not required to run background checks on new accounts, unlike credit card companies, and normally request just an applicant's name, address, and birth date. Critics say that makes the system an easier fraud target.
Executives at Square and Afterpay shared a desire to expand access to customers globally and saw combining forces as the best way to take on competitors.
Ultimately, Square has been slowly morphing into a bank, and this acquisition accelerates the process.
Square’s banking ambitions were already becoming very clear on the merchant-facing side of its business.
The company first applied for a banking license in 2017, and last year, it received conditional approval from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
The new bank, called Square Financial Services and based in Utah, was structured as a subsidiary of Square and started offering small business loans this past March.
Even before Square Financial Services went into operation in March, Square had been giving merchants small loans, using its detailed knowledge of transaction volumes to help approve applications quickly.
These loans, though, were disbursed through a partnership with another existing bank in a 10-K filing, Square revealed it collected on these loans by automatically deducting a fixed percentage of every card payment a merchant accepted.
In this way, Square had disbursed nearly $9 billion in loans before its small business loan and banking functions came online.
Square is diligently using its vast technology infrastructure build-out to maneuver into financial services.
They have been ahead of the curve in rolling out cutting-edge services such as its crypto offerings.
Retail banks will have a hard time competing with Square since they aren’t technology companies that think of challenges in terms of the technicalities of delivering a digital experience.
The problem with retail banking now is that the people who lead them are still bankers and not digitalists in a technology-first world.
Unsurprisingly, Square’s stock cheered the news and was up 10% on the news.
This move also continues the momentum of Square massively overperforming as a stock, management team, and business model in the past 18 months.
I have been highly bullish Square ever since the inception of the Mad Hedge Technology letter and the company has only validated my calls for outperformance.
The stock is somewhat volatile and prone to 5-7% pullbacks and I do believe those are precious opportunities to wade into Square with dollar cost averaging.
After pulling back to $200 in May, the strong lurch up to $270 needs time to digest, and readers just need to wait for the next consolidation.
“An asteroid or a supervolcano could certainly destroy us, but we also face risks the dinosaurs never saw: An engineered virus, nuclear war, inadvertent creation of a micro black hole, or some as-yet-unknown technology could spell the end of us.” – Said Founder of Tesla Elon Musk
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
August 2, 2021
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(ENPHASE IS WORTH A LOOK)
(ENPH)
Despite the global pandemic destroying large swaths of the U.S. economy, the solar sector has been a revelation and is one of the few industries that benefits from global warming.
Enphase Energy (ENPH) founded in 2006 has long been regarded as the world leading microinverter manufacturer.
What is a Micro Inverter?
A micro inverter is a very small inverter designed to be attached to each individual solar panel.
Based in the US, Enphase launched the first micro inverter, the M175 in 2008 but it wasn’t until the next-gen M190 was launched in 2009 that sales really took off.
Enphase has since established itself as an industry leader in micro inverter technology and has a huge market share in North America.
Under normal seasonality, the solar industry typically strengthens each quarter with the first quarter being the weakest boding well for the end of 2021.
The company reported revenue of $316.1 million, shipped approximately 2.36 million microinverters and 43-megawatt hours of Enphase storage systems, achieved non-GAAP gross margin of 40.8%.
The demand for microinverter systems continues to be well ahead of supply.
In Q2, Enphase experienced component constraints on the supplier AC Fed drivers, which resulted in microinverter shipment volume slightly lower as compared to Q1.
For the third quarter, Enphase continue to expect to remain constrained on microinverters, but the supply situation is better than what it was in the second quarter.
One of Enphase's critical competitive advantages is that the company operates more as a technology company than a commodity manufacturer.
While other companies do produce its main power inverter product, Enphase has market dominance in the micro-inverter segment.
For residential solar applications, micro-inverters do offer an advantageous alternative. Enphase's shipment growth over the past couple of years is the empirical evidence.
Even more salient, the company avoids ruinous capital expenditures by deploying contract manufacturing similar to peers with proprietary technology.
By leveraging these variables, Enphase has accelerated its high gross margins above 30% and now up to 40% in Q2 2021.
The company's lower margins last year were in part due to higher expedited shipping costs to satisfy demand but has solved that bottleneck and boosted gross margins.
Enphase's stable high gross margin is the x-factor.
Most solar module producers have high fixed costs which deteriorate margins and drag down utilization rates.
As a result, not only do shipments gyrate between industry cycles but also gross margin. While Enphase is also exposed to industry fiscal cliffs, high gross margins should be highly constructive even in down years.
During up cycles, Enphase's high gross margins and lower operating structure give it abnormally advantageous earnings leverage.
Enphase's earnings leverage will be even more dramatic once revenue growth reaccelerates after the pandemic filters through the U.S. economy.
Up until now, Enphase has been pigeonholed as an inverter company within the solar industry.
The company did offer a battery storage option, but it was not an overwhelming segment of total revenues.
This may change moving forward after the company's next-generation Encharge storage option released lately has shown glimpses of stardom among its competition.
Democrats hellbent on adopting clean energy might unearth an opportunity for sweeping change for US solar companies such as Enphase.
It’s already trending in that direction as a mega growth industry like technology.
Also, the Democrats are trying to crowbar in any climate-related infrastructure spending with adjacent bills.
If annual residential solar installations double with a slightly higher per home average, about one million homes would be converted to solar annually.
With over 139 million homes in the US, only a small fraction would be converted to produce solar electricity over the next decade or two, even if the US residential solar market doubled.
The main takeaway is that the solar market in the US still has huge upside under the Democrats and U.S. President Joe Biden.
Enphase has a current micro-inverter capacity of 10 million units annually and based on its per-unit assumption of 325 watts, can supply 3.25 GW annually.
Should the US solar market double due to beneficial policies, Enphase's potential market share will rise above 34%.
Ultimately, Enphase's high margins and fixed cost structure should not be underestimated especially under a systemic industry shift led by the US economy laser-focused on green infrastructure.
The secret recipe of high gross margin and low-cost structure make Enphase incredibly leveraged to top-line growth.
Lately, a new storage revenue stream and continued shipment growth in a rapidly expanding solar market should result in overperforming earnings growth.
New storage products will meaningfully add to earnings next year without diluting gross margin.
I first recommend this stock when it was trading at $120 in November 2020 and readers who bought into this story made a killing with the stock already at $189 today.
Enphase said its sales in the coming quarter should range from $335 million to $355 million, up about 1.5% from Q3 2020, and slightly above analyst expectations.
Gross profit margin, however, will move into reverse, continuing to fall below 40%, and perhaps as low as 37% therefore I would wait for a substantial correction before getting back into this one.
“Technology is a useful servant but a dangerous master.” - Said Norwegian Historian Christian Lous Lange
Legal Disclaimer
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.

















