• support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Member Login
Mad Hedge Fund Trader
  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Luncheons
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

The Future of Precision Medicine

Biotech Letter

Hyper-personalized treatments, otherwise known as precision medicine, have been hailed as one the hallmarks of the healthcare revolution in the past decade.

Although a lot of people don’t see the need for such personalized treatments, a 2017 study by Boston medicine professor Jason Vassy indicated otherwise.

In his paper, titled “Annals of Internal Medicine,” Vassy discussed how his team performed whole-genome sequencing to 100 perfectly healthy adults.

To give you a better picture of how big this project was, whole-genome sequencing involves the analysis of the entire body’s DNA -- yes, all 3 billion pairs of letters found in every individual’s body.

So, you can imagine how tedious and complicated Vassy’s process was and why a lot of people found that to be incredibly pointless, especially since the adults in the study are all “healthy.” More importantly, the naysayers believed that this process would only bring unnecessary panic and anxiety to the subjects.

However, the results shocked them as 20% of the people tested positive for rare, life-threatening conditions that required immediate medical attention.

This prompted more experts to delve deeper into gathering genetic data sets in an effort to bolster the preventive power of genomics. This movement was supported by the National Institutes of Health in 2018 via their “All of Us” project, investing $27 million.

Meanwhile, a Harvard geneticist named George Church founded a similar organization called Nebula Genomics.

Basically, the idea behind precision medicine is very simple: Understanding how your genome works means knowing exactly how to “optimize” your body.

That means health professionals will be able to determine the perfect diet, perfect exercise routine, and of course, the perfect drugs for every patient. You’ll even learn the diseases your body is most susceptible to and how to prevent those.

At the moment, the biotechnology world only has a handful of companies focusing on precision medicine.

One of the leading biotechnology companies in this field is Illumina (ILMN), which focuses on DNA sequencing.

Utilizing its advanced machines, Illumina has been designing treatments to target specific cells in the human body -- and its efforts have been rewarded in recent years.

So far, Illumina stock has been up by 5,791% since its initial public offering back in 2000.

At the moment, Illumina practically controls approximately 80% of the next-generation sequencing space geared towards human genome analysis.

The key to its success is the company’s move to zero in on short-read data sequencing, which has been known as the cheapest, quickest, and most accurate service available in the market.

Since Illumina is one of the top movers in this field, it has easily become the top dog with a long waiting list of clients willing to pay tons of cash for the biotechnology firm’s machines.

While the machines definitely cost a lot upon purchase, Illumina actually earns more from the follow-up revenues generated from all the instances that a biotechnology or research laboratory uses the company’s technology to sequence a genome.

In 2019, Illumina earned $390 million in instrument revenue and $1.73 billion in consumables profit in the first three quarters alone.

Unfortunately, one of Illumina’s efforts to broaden its hold of the market failed.

The company opened 2020 to bad news as regulatory pressures pushed Illumina to shut down its plan to acquire its rival, Pacific Biosciences (PACB), for $1.2 billion.

While no particular reason was officially given by the reviewing bodies, reports indicate that the merger had been delayed due to fears of creating a monopoly.

Nonetheless, many consider this an odd excuse considering that Illumina’s supposed “monopoly” would actually compete directly with Roche (RHHBY).

For comparison, Roche’s market capitalization is $275 billion while Illumina is at $49 billion. In terms of revenue, Illumina earns $3.5 billion annually while Roche rakes in $56.8 billion.

Nevertheless, Illumina has decided to shrug off the rejection and move on to another potentially lucrative deal -- a 15-year partnership with another up and coming next-generation sequencing company: Qiagen (QGEN).

Initially thought to be a surefire acquisition candidate by Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) to the tune of $8 billion, Qiagen opted to reject the offer.

Instead, the smaller biotechnology firm has decided to focus on expanding its product portfolio. In the next five years, Qiagen estimates an earnings growth rate of roughly 9.1%. 

Between Qiagen and Illumina, the former focuses more on individually customized treatments or “N-of-1 medicine.”

This has become even more pronounced following Qiagen’s acquisition of N-of-One, which raised $12.4 million in funding at the time, in January 2019.

N-of-One provides precision cancer care services. It offers clinical solutions like molecular interpretation to doctors and other healthcare professionals.

Apart from its partnership with Illumina, Qiagen also collaborates closely with NeoGenomics for cancer genetic testing services and DiaSorin for automated TB testing.

We’re in an era of remarkably personalized medical care.

With more and more genetic data made available for analysis, the rare diseases that boggled the minds of the healthcare industry are gradually becoming a thing of the past.

Now, we have access to tools that help with preventive measures to save us from the rare conditions that plagued our predecessors. If you really stop to think about it, targeted medicine just might be the key to immortality -- or at least to a significantly less disease-laden life. 

If you’re looking to invest in Illumina or Qiagen stock (or both), the best thing to do is to take advantage of the next price drop.

 

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/illumina.png 393 393 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2020-01-16 13:00:252020-01-16 13:55:10The Future of Precision Medicine
DougD

January 14, 2020

Biotech Letter

Mad Hedge Biotech & Healthcare Letter
January 14, 2020
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(CALIFORNIA JUMPS INTO THE DRUG BUSINESS)
(MYL), (TEVA), (RHHBY)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 DougD https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png DougD2020-01-14 11:02:412020-01-14 11:38:30January 14, 2020
DougD

California Jumps Into the Drug Business

Biotech Letter

The bio-pharmaceutical industry, including the biotechnology sector, is in for another shock. 

Taking a page off Elizabeth Warren’s book, California Governor Gavin Newson announced his plan to create the first-ever state-run prescription drug label in the country. 

This move would be an ideal way to leverage the size and power of the California population in terms of negotiating advantageous pricing with generic drug manufacturers. 

Wielding California’s massive purchasing power courtesy of the 40 million residents, almost 33% of which are enrolled in Medicaid or Medicare, Newsom believes that the government can get generic drugs for substantially lower prices from the manufacturers.  This idea is part of Newsom’s broader vision to lower the healthcare costs in California.

In effect, the Golden State is stepping in where the federal government has failed to act. Washington should have used their massive purchasing power as a cudgel to lower prices decades ago. We’ve seen a half-century of talk, but no action.

Research from the Kaiser Family Foundation shows that 6 out of 10 Americans take a prescription, with 79% of them complaining about the unreasonable costs of these drugs. 

As a result of these prohibitive prices, 3 in 10 Americans no longer take their prescribed medications adding hugely to the nation’s health care bill.  

Even governments find it challenging to keep up with the costs of healthcare, with California’s Medicaid program for the less fortunate, otherwise known as Medi-Cal, reached over $100 billion annually in state and federal spending alone.

Inevitably, the skyrocketing prices pushed people to look at generic medications as more reasonable alternatives to brand name medications. 

However, Newsom’s announcement wasn’t met with an overwhelmingly positive response from the generics sector either. 

In fact, the Association for Accessible Medicines, the advocacy organization for generic drug manufacturers, only sent out a polite message regarding Newson’s announcement. 

The group said that they "look forward to working with California to help expand access to safe, affordable and effective generic and biosimilar medicines, but let's make our decisions and policies based on the best data and science available." You couldn’t get any more anodyne.

Despite their lukewarm response to this plan, two major players in the generic pharmaceutical industry have already been identified as the front runners for this shift to generics movement: Mylan (MYL) and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA).

To say that 2019 was an awful one for Mylan is an understatement. The generic drugmaker faced a slew of issues including declining sales in their North American market, endless legal battles, and even exclusivity loss for its top-selling impotence treatment Tadalafil (Cialis). 

However, Mylan moved to turn things around in July 2019 when it entered a merger agreement with Pfizer’s (PFE) generic unit Upjohn. The two companies will turn into one entity, called Viatris, and will be launched by mid-2020.

According to the terms of this deal, Viatris will be handling the off-patent but lucrative branded drugs of Pfizer such as cholesterol treatment Lipitor, pain medication Celebrex, and erectile dysfunction and the blue erectile dysfunction drug Viagra. 

This agreement aims to inject more money into Mylan’s research and development team for them to create more complex generics and biosimilars. 

At the same time, the new company will already have a “ready-made” tried and tested drug portfolio courtesy of Pfizer’s off-patent previous blockbusters. 

Apart from the Pfizer’s lineup, Mylan also has a number of key products to contribute to Viatris. 

One is a biosimilar of Roche’s (RHHBY) blockbuster breast cancer drug Herceptin (it added four years to the life of my first wife). The launches of promising products, like biosimilar versions of Teva’s multiple sclerosis injection Copaxone and GlaxoSmithKline’s (GSK) asthma medication Advair, are also positive indicators of growth. 

With these decisions, Mylan is expected to have a brighter 2020. 

Another generic drug maker that’s expected to make a comeback in 2020 is Teva. 

In 2019, everything that could possibly go wrong went wrong for this company. As a refresher, here’s what it had to endure: executive leadership turnover, bribery allegations, generic competition for its top-selling drug Copaxone, and of course, the opioid lawsuits from 44 states. 

Needless to say, Teva’s profit estimates tumbled and its dividend was shelved. Worst, its debt load has been a huge warning sign that repelled investors left and right.

However, Teva has managed to turn things around.

The opioid lawsuits are reaching a reasonable settlement and the company now has a stronger leadership team. More importantly, it has been successful in cutting down its expenditures. If things go smoothly, Teva is expected to save $3 billion in yearly expenses to improve its profit margins in 2020. 

On top of these, Teva has regained its footing in the generic drug market via the steady climb in terms of sales of its newer branded treatments, Ajovy and Austedo.

All in all, the stage is set for Teva to make its comeback and patient investors should expect to be richer in 2020.

Since both generic drug makers churned out less than stellar numbers in 2019, the stocks are likely undervalued at the moment. Hence, it’s important to take advantage of this and buy before these regain momentum and the prices skyrocket once again.  

 

 

 

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/bio3-01142020.jpg 237 582 DougD https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png DougD2020-01-14 11:00:352020-01-14 11:40:47California Jumps Into the Drug Business
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

January 9, 2020

Biotech Letter

Mad Hedge Biotech & Healthcare Letter
January 9, 2020
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(THE 2020 DARK HORSES OF BIOTECH)
(AMRN), (THOR), (SAN), (NBSE), (OHRP),
 (MRNA), (MRK), (AZN), (VRTX), (RGLS), (ARWR)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2020-01-09 14:02:362020-01-09 13:48:49January 9, 2020
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

The 2020 Dark Horses of Biotech

Biotech Letter

For all the flak the healthcare sector has received for the exorbitant prices of its products and services, there’s no denying the fact that this industry had an incredibly remarkable decade -- and biotechnology proved to be one of the most lucrative markets when it comes to stocks that actually double or triple in value, sometimes even overnight.

The primary reason for this is that no one could predict the success or failure of clinical trials with any degree of accuracy, forcing investors to take into account elements of surprise in the valuation process in biotech.

Companies that analysts believe to be prime candidates for acquisition early on in their life cycle would end up repeatedly failing to lure viable tender offers for years. Meanwhile, dark horses emerge from the leftfield and snap up the best deals.

A good case in point would be how experts and investors alike missed the mark on Amarin Pharmaceutical’s (AMRN) cardiovascular treatment Vascepa. On the outset, analysts pegged the new prescription omega-3 treatment as a failure and a money sinkhole.

Instead, Vascepa surpassed all expectations and is now hailed as the fish oil supplement to demonstrate clear-cut cardiovascular benefits to high-risk heart attack patients.

In 2019 alone, Vascepa grew by 85% compared to its 2018 report, coming in between $410 million and $425 million in sales -- and 2020 is expected to be an even better year for this drug as sales are estimated to reach between $650 million and $700 million.

Another example is synthetic protein maker Synthorx (THOR), which was initially tagged as an ominous stock.

The company proved detractors wrong when it went on to fetch huge offers from giant biotech firms, with Sanofi SA (SAN) winning the bidding war over Synthorx to the tune of $2.5 billion.

This new year, though, promises to offer more predictability, especially on the merger and acquisition front.

Several blue-chip biotech’s are on the verge of key patent expirations in the next decade. On top of that, these companies are facing tremendous pressure from US politicians to cut down on the prices of their brand name drugs. Today, the State of California announced that it was going into the generic drug industry to undercut the majors.

These dual headwinds are expected to fuel an uptick in the demand for bolt-on acquisitions, which can provide the giant biotech’s with healthy levels of profit via large sales volumes as they attempt to slash their slashes to acceptable levels.

With this in mind, big biopharma’s will be willing to shell out top dollar to acquire promising companies this 2020.

Which biotech’s have the goods to take full advantage of this acquisition demand?

One up-and-coming company tagged as a red-hot acquisition candidate is NeuBase Therapeutics (NBSE).

Founded in 2018, this Pittsburgh company has raked in $9 million in funding so far to develop treatments that target rare, genetic neurological disorders. Neubase’s platform, called peptide-nucleic acid antisense oligonucleotide or PATrOL technology, was developed at Carnegie Melon University.

Basically, this technology offers gene-silencing therapies for its patients suffering from rare genetic disorders.

In July 2019, NeuBase engaged in a reverse merger with fellow biotech innovator Ohr Pharmaceuticals (OHRP). This partnership is expected to rake in massive rewards since both companies greatly complement each other’s work.

NeuBase’s work zeroes in on curing rare genetic diseases via gene-silencing treatments while Ohr’s research is geared towards helping patients suffering from cancer cachexia and macular degeneration.

The combined efforts of these two should result in a wider reach as they offer cutting-edge treatments to highly lucrative and specialized markets.

As of December 2019, NeuBase has a recorded market cap of $114.38 million. Considering all its assets and the way its pipeline is shaping up, NeuBase could easily be your best sleeper stock in 2020.

Another biotech company to watch out for this year is Moderna Inc (MRNA), which has raised a whopping $1.8 billion in funding over 10 rounds.

So far, this company has attracted blue-chip companies in the form of Merck and Co (MRK), which invested $125 million, and AstraZeneca (AZN) with $474 million so far.

In terms of stability, Moderna has been doing quite well for itself with $68.2 million in estimated annual revenue.

In 2019, Moderna shared that it has at least 11 programs set for clinical trials along with 20 development candidates. Its research leans towards producing cancer vaccines and localized regenerative therapeutics.

Its strategic alliances not only with AstraZeneca and Merck but also with Vertex Pharmaceuticals (VRTX), Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, and even the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation equip Moderna with a remarkable competitive edge against rivals Regulus Therapeutics (RGLS), Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals (ARWR), and CureVac.

I’m expecting huge movements in the biotech market in 2020 as the curtain rises on all these promising technologies and the rise of this industry becomes impossible to ignore.

 

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2020-01-09 14:00:022020-12-18 00:24:08The 2020 Dark Horses of Biotech
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

January 7, 2020

Biotech Letter

Mad Hedge Biotech & Healthcare Letter
January 7, 2020
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(WHAT’S NEXT IN THE BIOTECH PIPELINE?)

(ITCI), (AIMT), (BIO), (JNJ)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2020-01-07 07:02:382020-01-07 07:36:49January 7, 2020
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

What’s Next in the Biotech Pipeline?

Biotech Letter

Investing in biotech stocks demands prudence combined with a sprinkling of optimism. This means taking in announcements from companies bragging about potential blockbuster drugs with a grain of salt.

After all, a single misstep towards gaining FDA approval could easily set back any progress, erase any hope of salvaging the discovery, and eventually, send their share prices spiraling down.

On the other hand, choosing a biotech stock that would deliver on its promise means reaping rich dividends in the future.  

With all the developments in store though, it’s hard to see why 2020 can’t easily go down as The Year of Biotech. Here are some things that caught my eye.

Christmas came early for Intra-Cellular Therapies (ITCI) as its long-awaited schizophrenia drug, Caplyta, received the green light from the FDA.

Although it has taken a few years for the biotech firm to announce the results of its schizophrenia trials, its investors are confident that Calpyta’s journey from this highly sought approval to marketing will be smooth sailing.

While the number of people suffering from schizophrenia and bipolar disorder is not as many as those facing major depressive disorder, treatments for the former conditions remain lacking. In fact, health specialists have been looking for more convenient options -- one that won’t hinder the daily lives of patients taking it. 

This blockbuster drug, pegged as a safer and better alternative to Johnson and Johnson’s (JNJ) Risperidone, is expected to expand Lumateperone’s reach in the mental health market.

Despite earning an early victory, ITCI is already gearing up to tweak Calpyta’s indications and seek bipolar depression approvals as well. At the moment, this schizophrenia drug is estimated to cross $1 billion in sales following its 2020 launch in the market.

Meanwhile, there’s another big market drug that’s projected to make a major launch in 2020. Aimmune Therapeutics’ (AIMT) AR101. Otherwise known Palforzia, this will be the first-ever treatment for peanut allergies.

Although there’s no price tag released yet, a year’s supply of Palforzia is estimated to cost $4,200 per patient.

These pull-apart capsules, which are basically comprised of unmodified peanut flour plus a bunch of inactive ingredients, aim to provide medication for a food allergy that affects one in 13 children today.

The FDA is expected to release its decision on Palforzia sometime in January 2020, so it’ll definitely be a prosperous New Year for its investors.

Another biotech company that’s set to make a splash in a lucrative market is Bluebird Bio (BIO).

At the moment, investors are chomping at the bit for good news concerning the company’s future crown jewel: genetic blood disease treatment Zynteglo.

In 2019, Zynteglo gained approval in the European market. Now, Bluebird is setting its sights to also conquer the US market as one in every 100,000 people is afflicted by this rare condition.

More than that, the only approved therapy for this genetic blood ailment is a blood transfusion done regularly.

Given the rarity of the disease and the efficacy of the treatment, Zynteglo’s price tag will obviously be on the high end.

This therapy is expected to cost roughly $1.8 million in total for every patient. To ease the burden though, Bluebird shared that it’s open to four- and five-year installment plans. That puts every gene therapy infusion at $355,000 per session.

Despite this massive expense, Bluebird actually believes that it’s selling its treatment at a discount of about 15% compared to the actual market value of $2.1 million.

This conviction comes from the fact that the company estimates adding 22 quality-adjusted life years to the lives of every successfully treated patient.

All three biotech stocks could easily skyrocket, especially Bluebird Bio. As for Aimmune Therapeutics, the company is currently financially healthy so it shouldn’t encounter any trouble meeting obligations. Meanwhile, ITCI has been gifting its investors with early Christmas presents since it first released promising results of its schizophrenia study.

 

 

 

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/fda.png 375 583 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2020-01-07 07:00:532020-01-07 07:34:06What’s Next in the Biotech Pipeline?
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

December 26, 2019

Biotech Letter

Mad Hedge Biotech & Healthcare Letter
December 26, 2019
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(THE BOOM IN CANCER DRUGS),
(MRK), (CELG), (RHHBY), (BMY), (LLY), (NOVN)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2019-12-26 07:32:292019-12-26 07:27:23December 26, 2019
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

The Boom in Cancer Drugs

Biotech Letter

Forecasting drug revenue can be a tricky business -- just ask the biotech leaders who overpromised but underdelivered.

These days, more and more variables are coming into play, with the US elections looming over us and the threat of generic meds overtaking market leaders becoming more tangible by the minute. 

Another threat is the entry of biosimilars in the US, knocking down big-name drugs even in the most lucrative markets. Payers are also constantly seeking discounts, forcing tougher competition among crowded markets like diabetes and hepatitis. 

However, the oncology sector remains a booming sector for the biotech industry.

Practically all major companies are either developing oncology treatments or already marketing these as blockbuster treatments, with 63 cancer drugs launched in just the past five years.

Unfortunately, not all cancer drugs are created equal. Looking at the spending on the treatments in recent years, it can clearly be seen that almost 80% of the money has been hogged by the industry leaders with the rest of the group lagging far behind.

To put things in perspective, bear in mind that the annual sales of the top 20 cancer drugs have reached over $50 billion, with $31 billion distributed among industry leaders Merck and Co (MRK), Celgene (CELG), and Roche Holdings (RHHBY).

These numbers hardly come as a surprise especially in light of over $133 billion recorded in spending for cancer treatments. 

The top-selling oncology drug to date is multiple myeloma treatment Revlimid. Technically a Celgene product, the company’s $74 billion acquisition by Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMY) means the drug will be joining the other powerhouse offerings in the newly formed company’s lineup in the years to come.

With over a decade of dominance in the market and an impressive $9.7 billion in global sales annually, Revlimid has yet to hit its peak.

In fact, this mega-blockbuster is projected to exceed $15 billion in sales next year.

As if that wasn’t impressive enough, this oncology leader is estimated to bring more than double that amount come 2022.

Another dominant player in the oncology market is lung cancer drug Keytruda. Since its launch, this Merck immunotherapy leader has been able to usher in a boatload of cancer treatments using its core indications -- and it’s not yet done.

With an FDA approval eyed on June 29, 2020 for yet another indication for Keytruda, specifically for treating cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), its goal to dethrone Revlimid as the leader in this space now looks achievable.

Right now, Keytruda is used for various cancer types.

Aside from dominating the large addressable lung cancer market, it’s also used to treat head and neck cancer as well as melanoma. This makes Keytruda’s contributions indispensable to Merck’s overall top-line and continuous growth in sales in the past years. 

Hence, it comes as no surprise that Merck’s recent third-quarter earnings had Keytruda is the starring role once again. Sales for this oncology drug jumped 62% year over year, reaching almost $3.1 billion.

One more dominant force in the oncology sector is Roche, with breast cancer drug Herceptin serving as the primary moneymaker of the company in the past 15 years.

With Herceptin raking in roughly $7 billion in annual sales in recent years, Roche has been proactive in securing its position in the oncology space by adding blockbusters ovarian cancer drug Avastin and leukemia medication Rituxan in the list.

For years, these three cancer drugs have formed the foundation of Roche’s continuous growth in the oncology sector. However, these treatments are now in danger of facing competition.

A particularly aggressive competitor is Pfizer (PFE), with its breast cancer drug Ibrance gaining traction as shown by its growing sales from $0.7 billion in 2015 to a promising $4.1 billion in 2018. Other competitors include Eli Lilly’s (LLY) Verzinio and Novartis’ (NOVN) Piqray.

To maintain its stronghold, Roche has been aggressive as well in developing new drugs.

Word has it that the company is expecting an addition $5 billion in sales for its new cancer treatments like breast cancer drugs Perjeta and Kadycla along with lung cancer medications Tecentriq and Alecensa.

 

 

 

 

 

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/celgene.png 339 385 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2019-12-26 07:30:122019-12-26 07:27:52The Boom in Cancer Drugs
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

December 24, 2019

Biotech Letter

Mad Hedge Biotech & Healthcare Letter
December 24, 2019
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(TAKING A SECOND LOOK AT SANOFI),
 (SNY), (NVO)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2019-12-24 06:02:252019-12-24 04:59:58December 24, 2019
Page 109 of 114«‹107108109110111›»

tastytrade, Inc. (“tastytrade”) has entered into a Marketing Agreement with Mad Hedge Fund Trader (“Marketing Agent”) whereby tastytrade pays compensation to Marketing Agent to recommend tastytrade’s brokerage services. The existence of this Marketing Agreement should not be deemed as an endorsement or recommendation of Marketing Agent by tastytrade and/or any of its affiliated companies. Neither tastytrade nor any of its affiliated companies is responsible for the privacy practices of Marketing Agent or this website. tastytrade does not warrant the accuracy or content of the products or services offered by Marketing Agent or this website. Marketing Agent is independent and is not an affiliate of tastytrade. 

Legal Disclaimer

There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.

Copyright © 2025. Mad Hedge Fund Trader. All Rights Reserved. support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • FAQ
Scroll to top