(WELCOME TO THE WONDERFUL WORLD OF OPTIONS),
(WHAT IS AN OPTION? -THE BASICS)
Note to Readers: Over the next ten trading days, you will be receiving my options trading boot camp. That's because this week, I’ll be knocking off from my daily routine to dive into some deep research pieces. The following week, I’ll be hosting my June 8-10 Traders & Investors Summit, to which you will receive an invitation shortly. Enjoy.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2021-06-01 09:06:292021-06-01 11:16:48June 1, 2021
Below please find subscribers’ Q&A for the May 26 Mad Hedge Fund TraderGlobal Strategy Webinar broadcast from Lake Tahoe, NV.
Q: Do you expect a longer pullback for the (SPY) through the summer and into the last quarter?
A: No, this market is chomping at the bit and go up and won’t do any more than a 5% correction. We’ve already tested this pullback twice. We could stay in this 5% range for a few more weeks or months, but no longer. If we make it to August before we take off to the upside, that would be a miracle. It seems to want to break out right now and if you look at the tech stocks charts you can see what I'm talking about.
Q: Why do day orders with spreads not good ‘til canceled (GTC)?
A: Actually, you can do good ‘til canceled on these spreads, it just depends on how your platform is set up. Good ‘til canceled won't hurt you—only if we get a sudden reversal on a stop out which has only happened four times this year.
Q: Disney (DIS) seems to be struggling to get back over $180; am I still safe with my January 2023 $250 LEAPS?
A: Yes, out to 2023 we’ll have two summers until those expire, so those look pretty good—that's a pretty aggressive trade, and I’m betting you’re looking at a 500% profit on those LEAPS. And by the way, I always urge people to go out long on these LEAPS, because the second year is almost free when you check the pricing. So, take the gift and that will also greatly reduce your risk. We could have a whole recession and recovery, and still have those LEAPS make it to $250 in Disney.
Q: Should I add to Freeport McMoRan (FCX)?
A: (FCX) I would not add—in fact, I would have a stop loss if we closed below $40 on (FCX) if you’re a short-term trader. There is a slowdown in the Chinese economy going on as well as a clampdown on commodity speculation. This has affected the whole base metal space, including steel and palladium. If you have the long-term LEAPS, keep them, because I think (FCX) doubles from here. The whole “green revolution story” is still good.
Q: Do you think the United States Treasury Bond Fund (TLT) is going up?
A: No, I think the (TLT) has been going down. I've been buying puts spreads like crazy, and I have a huge chunk of my own retirement fund in long-dated (TLT) LEAPS, so I am praying it will go down. We’ll talk about that when we get to the bond section.
Q: Prospects for U.S. Steel (X)?
A: It’s tied in with the whole rest of the base commodity complex—I think it is due for a rest after a terrific run, which is why I have such tight stop losses on Freeport McMoRan (FCX).
Q: Do you buy the “transitory” explanation for the hot inflation read two weeks ago that the Fed is handing out, or do you think inflation is bad and here to stay?
A: I go with the transitory argument because you’re getting a lot of one-time-only price rises off of the bottom a year ago when the economy completely shut down. Once those price rises work through the system, the inflation rate should go from 4.2% back down to 2% or so. So, I don't see inflation as a risk, which is why I think the stock markets can reach my 30% up target this year. You may get another hot month as the year-on-year comparisons are enormous. But betting on inflation is betting on the reversal of a 40-year trend, which usually doesn’t work out so well.
Q: On your spread trade alerts can we buy less than 25 contracts?
A: You can buy one contract. In fact, I recommend people start with one contract and test out where the real market is. Put a bid for one contract in the middle of the market, and if it doesn’t get done, raise your bid 5 cents, and eventually, your order gets done. Then you can add more if you want to. I always recommend this even for people who buy thousands of contracts, that they test the market with one contract order just to make sure the market is actually there.
Q: Can you recommend a LEAPS for Amazon (AMZN)?
A: The Amazon LEAPS spread is the January 2022 $3150-3300 vertical call debit spread going out 8 months.
Q: When you short the (TLT), how do you do it?
A: I do vertical bear put debit spreads. I buy a near-money put and sell short and an out-of-the-money put so I can reduce the cost, and therefore triple my size. This strategy triples the leverage on the most likely part of the stock move to take place, which is the at the money. For example, a great one to buy here would be a January 2021 (TLT) $135/140 vertical bear put debit spread where you’re buying the $140 and selling short the $135. The potential 8-month profit on this is around 100%. You’ll make far more money on that kind of trade than you ever would just buying puts outright. Some 80% of the time the single option trades expire worthless. You don’t want to become one of those worthless people.
Q: What’s your best idea for avoiding a U.S. Dollar drop?
A: Buy the Invesco Currency Shares Euro Trust (FXE) or buy the Invesco Currency Shares Australian Dollar Trust Trust (FXA), the Australian Dollar to hedge some of your US Dollar risk. The Australian dollar is basically a call option on a global economic recovery.
Q: I’m a new subscriber, but I don’t get all the recommendations that you mention.
A: Please email customer support at support@madhedgefundtrader.com , tell them you’re not getting trade alerts, and she'll set you up. We have to get you into a different app in order for you to get all those alerts.
Q: How about the ProShares UltraShort 20 Year Treasury ETF (TBT)—is that a bet on declining (TLT)?
A: Absolutely yes, that is a great bet and we’re at a great entry point right now on the (TBT) so that is something I would start scaling into today.
Q: Do you still like Palantir (PLTR)?
A: Yes, but the reason I haven't been pushing it is because the CEO says he could care less about the stock market, and when the CEO says that it tends to be a drag on the stock. Palantir has an easy double or triple on it on a three-year view though. However, small tech has been out of favor since February as it is overpriced.
Q: How far down can the (TLT) go in the next 30 days?
A: It could go down to $135 and maybe $132 on an extreme move, especially if we get another hot CPI read on June 10. However, if you hear the word “taper” from a Fed official, then you’re looking at high $120’s in days.
Q: With the TLT going up, why have you not sent out an alert to double up on put spreads?
A: I tend to be a bit of a perfectionist since I’m a scientist and an engineer, so I’m hanging on for an absolute top to prove itself and start on the way down. On the shorts, I like selling them on the way down, and buying my longs on the way up, because there are always surprises, there’s always the unknown, and heaven forbid, I might actually be wrong sometimes! So, I’m still waiting on this one. And we do already have one position that is fairly close to the money now, the June 2021 $141-144 vertical bear put debit spread, so I don't want to double up on that until we have a reversal in the intermediate term trend.
Q: I see GameStop (GME) is spiking again now up to $230—should I get in for a short-term profit?
A: No. With these meme stocks, the trading is totally random. If anything, I would be selling short, but I would do it in a limited risk way by buying a put spread. However, the implied volatility in the options on these meme stocks are so high that it's almost impossible to make any money on options; you’re paying enormous amounts of money up front, so that's my opinion on GameStop and on AMC Entertainment Holdings (AMC), the other big meme stock.
Q: Will business travel come back after the world is vaccinated?
A: Absolutely. Companies don't want to send people on the road, but customers will demand it. All you need is one competitor to land an order because they visited the customer instead of doing a Zoom (ZM) meeting, and all of a sudden business travel will come roaring back. So that's why I was dabbling in Delta Airlines (DAL) and that's why I like American Express (AXP), where 8% of transactions are for first class airline tickets.
Q: As the work-from-home economy stops and workers go back to the office, do you see a 10% correction in the housing market?
A: Actually, in the housing market with real houses, I don't see prices dropping for years, because 30% of the people who went home to work are staying there for good—that the trend out of the cities into the hinterlands is a long-term trend that will continue for decades, now that Zoom has freed us of the obligations to commute and be near big cities. And of course, I’m a classic example of that; I've been working either in my basement in San Francisco or at Lake Tahoe for the last 14 years. Housing stocks on the other hand like Lennar (LEN), Toll Brothers (TOL) and KB Home (KBH) have had a tremendous run and are basically out of homes. Could they have a 10% correction at any time? Absolutely, yes.
Q: Should I avoid buying dips in last year's work-from-home stocks?
A: Yes I would. DocuSign (DOCO) and Zoom (ZM) are the two best ones because they were both up 12X from their lows, and I tend not to chase things that are up 12X unless they are a Tesla (TSLA) or an Nvidia (NVDA) or something like that. In the end, Tesla went up 295 times.
Q: Are you looking at the carbon credits market?
A: No, but I probably should. That market shut down last year. It’s alive again, and it looks like it's growing like crazy.
Q: What’s the ideal volatility for individual options? What do you use to compare?
A: Always look at the implied volatility of the option compared to the realized volatility of the underlying stock; and when the difference gets too big, you get ideal conditions for putting on call and put spreads, which take advantage of this. These are almost volatility neutral because you’re long on one batch of volatility and short on the other.
Q: Is it too late to get involved in the ProShares Ultra Technology ETF (ROM), the 2X long ETF in a spread?
A: The November 2021 $121-125 vertical bull call spread, the farthest expiration you can get for the (ROM), was kind of aggressive—I would go closer to the money. We’re right around mid $80s right now, so maybe do a January 2022 $95-100, and even that will get you something like a 400% gain by November.
To watch a replay of this webinar with all the charts, bells, whistles, and classic rock music, just log in to go to MY ACCOUNT, click on GLOBAL TRADING DISPATCH (or Tech Letter as the case may be), then WEBINARS, and all the webinars from the last ten years are there in all their glory.
Good Luck and Stay Healthy.
John Thomas
CEO & Publisher
The Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader
Summit of Mount Rose at 10,778 feet with Lake Tahoe on the Right
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/john-thomas-skyline-e1608829740615.png375500Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2021-05-28 09:02:502021-05-28 10:34:22May 26 Biweekly Strategy Webinar Q&A
I believe there is a good chance that this creation of Jeff Bezos will see its shares double over the next five years.
Amazon is, in effect, taking over the world.
Jeff Bezos, born Jeff Jorgensen, is the son of an itinerant alcoholic circus clown and a low-level secretary in Albuquerque, New Mexico. When he was three, his father abandoned the family. His mother remarried a Cuban refugee, Miguel Bezos, who eventually became a chemical engineer for Exxon.
I have known Jeff Bezos for so long he had hair when we first met in the 1980s. He was a quantitative researcher in the bond department at Morgan Stanley, and I was the head of international trading.
Bezos was then recruited by the cutting-edge quantitative hedge fund, D.E. Shaw, which was making fortunes at the time, but nobody knew how. When I heard in 1994 that he left his certain success there to start an online bookstore, I thought he’d suffered a nervous breakdown, common in our industry.
Bezos incorporated his company in Washington state later that year, initially calling it “Cadabra” and then “Relentess.com.” He finally chose “Amazon” as the first interesting word that appeared in the dictionary, suggesting a river of endless supply. When I learned that Bezos would call his start-up “Amazon,” I thought he’d gone completely nuts.
Bezos funded his start-up with a $300,000 investment from his parents who he promised stood a 75% chance of losing their entire investment. But then his parents had already spent a lifetime running Bezos through a series of programs for gifted children, so they had the necessary confidence.
It was a classic garage start-up with three employees based in scenic Bellevue, Washington. The hours were long with all of the initial effort going into programming the initial site. To save money, Bezos bought second-hand pine doors which he placed on sawhorses, which stood in for proper desks.
Bezos initially considered 20 different industries to disrupt, including CDs and computer software. He quickly concluded that books were the ripest for disruption, as they were cheap, globally traded, and offered millions of titles.
When Amazon.com was finally launched in 1995, the day was spent fixing software bugs on the site, and the night wrapping and shipping the 50 or so orders a day. Growth was hyperbolic from the get-go, with sales reaching $20,000 a week by the end of the second month.
An early problem was obtaining supplies of books when wholesalers refused to offer him credit or deliver books on time. Eventually, he would ask suppliers to keep a copy of every book in existence at their own expense, which could ship within 24 hours.
Venture capital rounds followed, eventually raising $200 million. Early participants all became billionaires, gaining returns or 10,000-fold or more, including his trusting parents. There is one guy out there who missed becoming a billionaire because he didn’t check his voicemail often enough, which invited him into the initial funding round.
Bezos put the money to work, launching into a hiring binge of epic proportions. “Send us your freaks,” Bezos told the recruiting agencies, looking for the tattooed and the heavily pierced who were willing to work in shipping late at night for low wages. Keeping costs rock bottom was always an essential part of the Amazon formula.
Bezos used his new capital to raid Wal-Mart (WMT) for its senior distribution staff, for which it was later sued.
Amazon rode on the coattails of the Dotcom Boom to go public on NASDAQ on May 15, 1997 at $18 a share. The shares quickly rocketed to an astonishing $105, and in 1999 Jeff Bezos became Time magazine’s “Man of the Year.”
Unfortunately, the company committed many of the mistakes common to inexperienced management with too much cash on their hands. It blew $200 million on acquisitions that, for the most part, failed. Those include such losers as Pets.com and Drugstore.com. But Bezos’s philosophy has always been to try everything and fail them quickly, thus enabling Amazon to evolve 100 times faster than any other.
Amazon went into the Dotcom crash with tons of money on its hands, thus enabling it to survive the long funding drought that followed. Thousands of other competitors failed. Amazon shares plunged to $5.
But the company kept on making money. Sales soared by 50% a month, eventually topping $1 billion by 2001. The media noticed Wall Street took note. The company moved from the garage to a warehouse to a decrepit office building in downtown Seattle.
Amazon moved beyond books to compact disc sales in 1999. Electronics and toys followed. At its New York toy announcement, Bezos realized that the company actually had no toys on hand. So, he ordered an employee to max out his credit card cleaning out the local Hammacher Schlemmer just to obtain some convincing props.
A pattern emerged. As Bezos entered a new industry, he originally offered to run the online commerce for the leading firm. This happened with Circuit City, Borders, and Toys “R” Us. The firms then offered to take over Amazon, but Bezos wasn’t selling.
In the end Amazon came to dominate every field it entered. Please note that all three of the abovementioned firms no longer exist, thanks to extreme price competition from Amazon.
Amazon had a great subsidy in the early years as it did not charge state sales tax. As of 2011, it only charged sales tax in five states. That game is now over, with Amazon now collecting sales taxes in all 45 states that have them.
Amazon Web Services originally started out to manage the firm’s own website. It has since grown into a major profit center, with $17.4 billion in net revenues in 2017. Full disclosure: Mad Hedge Fund Trader is a customer.
Amazon entered the hardware business with the launch of its e-reader Kindle in 2007, which sold $5 billion worth in its first year. The Amazon Echo smart speaker followed in 2015 and boasts 71.9% market share. This is despite news stories that it records family conversations and randomly laughs.
Amazon Studios started in 2010, run by a former Disney executive, pumping out a series of high-grade film productions. In 2017 it became the first streaming studio to win an Oscar with Manchester by the Sea with Jeff Bezos visibly in the audience at the Hollywood awards ceremony.
Its acquisitions policy also became much more astute, picking up audiobook company Audible.com, shoe seller Zappos, Whole Foods, and most recently PillPack. Since its inception, Amazon has purchased more than 86 outside companies. Make that 89 with MGM Entertainment.
Sometimes, Amazon’s acquisition tactics are so predatory they would make John D. Rockefeller blush. It decided to get into the discount diaper business in 2010, and offered to buy Diapers.com, which was doing business under the name of “Quidsi.” The company refused, so Amazon began offering its own diapers for sale 30% cheaper for a loss. Diapers.com was driven to the wall and caved, selling out for $545 million. Diaper prices then popped back up to their original level.
Welcome to online commerce.
At the end of 2018, Amazon boasted some 306,000 employees worldwide. In fact, it has been the largest single job creator in the United States for the past decade. Also, this year it disclosed the number of Amazon Prime members at 100 million, then raised the price from $80 to $100, thus creating an instant $2 billion in profit.
The company’s ability to instantly create profit like this is breathtaking. And this will make you cry. In 2016, Amazon made $2.4 billion from Amazon gift cards left unredeemed!
In Q1 of 2021, Amazon revenues totaled an unbelievable $108.5 billion, up 44% YOY. Both operating profits of $8.1 billion and operating margins of 8.2% set new records. It is currently capturing about 50% of all new online sales. Clearly, it was a huge pandemic winner.
So, what’s on the menu for Amazon? There is a lot of new ground to pioneer.
1) Health Care is the big one, accounting for $3 trillion, or 17% of U.S. GDP, but where Amazon has just scratched the surface. Its recent $1 billion purchase of PillPack signals a new focus on the area. Who knows? The hyper-competition Bezos always brings to a new market would solve the American health care crisis, which is largely cost-driven. Bezos can oust middlemen like no one else.
2) Food is the great untouched market for online commerce, which accounts for 20% of total U.S. retail spending, but sees only 2% take place online. Essentially this is a distribution problem, and you have to accomplish this within the prevailing subterranean 1% profit margins in the industry. Books don’t need to be frozen or shipped fresh. Wal-Mart (WMT) will be target No. 1, which currently gets 56% of its sales from groceries. Amazon took a leap up the learnings curve with its $13.7 billion purchase of Whole Foods (WFC) in 2017. What will follow will be interesting.
3) Banking is another ripe area for “Amazonification,” where excessive fees are rampant. It would be easy for the company to accelerate the process through buying a major bank that already had licenses in all 50 states. Amazon is already working the credit card angle.
4) Overnight Delivery is a natural, as Amazon is already the largest shipper in the U.S., sending out more than 1 million packages a day. The company has a nascent effort here, already acquiring several aircraft to cover its most heavily trafficked routes. Expect FedEx (FDX), UPS (UPS), DHL, and the United States Post Office to get severely disrupted.
5) Clothing-Amazon has already surpassed Wal-Mart this year as the largest clothing retailer. The company has already launched 76 private labels, with half of them in the fashion area, such as Clifton Heritage (color and printed shirts), Buttoned Down (100% cotton shirts), and Goodthreads (casual shirts) as well as subscription services for all of the above.
6) Furniture is currently the fastest-growing category at Amazon. Customers can use an Amazon tool to design virtual rooms to see where new items and colors will fit best.
7) Event Ticketing firms like StubHub and Ticketmaster are among the most despised companies in the U.S., so they are great disruption candidates. Amazon has already started in the U.K., and a takeover of one of the above would ease its entry into the U.S.
If only SOME of these new business ventures succeed, they have the potential to DOUBLE Amazon’s shares from current levels, taking its market capitalization up to $3.2 trillion. Perhaps this explains why institutional investors continue to pour into the shares, despite being up a torrid 134% from the February lows.
Whatever happened to Bezos’s real father, Ted Jorgensen? He was discovered by an enterprising journalist in 2012 running a bicycle shop in Glendale, Arizona. He had long ago sobered up and remarried. He had no idea who Jeff Bezos was. Ted Jorgensen died in 2015. Bezos never took the time to meet him. Too busy running Amazon, I guess. Worth over $200 billion, Bezos is now the second richest man in the world after Elon Musk.
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/amzn-financial-results.png536864Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2021-05-27 09:02:382021-05-27 14:50:46Why Amazon is Beating All
No, this piece is not about the reality TV show that has a gruff lot of hopeful entrepreneurs blindly bidding for the contents of abandoned storage lockers.
With hyper-accelerating technology creating data at an exponential rate, it is getting far too big to physically store.
In 2018, over $80 billion was spent on data centers across the country, often in the remotest areas imaginable. Bend, OR, rural West Virginia, or dusty, sun-baked Sparks, NV, yes, they’re all there.
And you know what the biggest headache for the management of many tech companies is today? A severe shortage of cost-effective data storage and the skyrocketing electric power bills to power them.
During my lifetime, storage has evolved from one-inch magnetic tape on huge reels to highly unreliable 5 ¼ inch floppy disks, then 3-inch discs, and later to compact discs.
The solid-state storage on silicon chips that hit the market six years ago was a dream, as it was cheap, highly portable, and lightning-fast. Boot up time shrank from minutes to seconds. The only problem was the heat and sitting on it when you forgot those ultra-slim designs on the sofa.
Moore’s Law, which has storage doubling every 18 months while the cost halves, has proved faithful to the bitter end. The problem now is, the end is near, as the size of an electron becoming too big to pass through a gate increasingly a limiting factor.
As of 2017, the world needed 44 gigabytes of storage per day. According to the International Data Corporation, that figure will explode to 460 billion gigabytes by 2025, in a mere seven years.
That’s when the global data sphere will reach 160 trillion gigabytes, or 160 zettabytes. It all sounds like something out of an Isaac Asimov science fiction novel.
You can double that figure again when Google’s Project Loon brings the planet’s 5 million residents currently missing from the Internet online.
In the meantime, companies are making fortunes on the build-out. Some $50 billion has to be spent this year just to keep even with burgeoning storage demand.
And guess what? Thanks to rocketing demand from electric cars and AI, memory-grade silicon is expected to run out by 2040.
All I can say is “Better pray for DNA.”
Deoxyribonucleic acid has long been the Holy Grail for data storage. There is no reason why it shouldn’t work. After all, you and I are the product of the most dynamic data storage system known to man.
All of the information needed to replicate ourselves is found in 3 trillion base pairs occupying every single cell in the human body.
To give you some idea of the immense scalability of DNA, consider this. One exabyte of data storage using convention silicon would weigh 320 metric tonnes. The same amount of information in DNA would occupy five cubic centimeters weighing five grams, or 0.18 ounce!
And here is the big advantage of DNA. Conventional silicon permits only two programming choices, “0” or “1”. Even with just that, we have been able to achieve incredible gains in computing over the last 50 years.
DNA is made of four different bases, adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thymine, which allow four squared possible combinations, or 16. The power demands are immeasurably small and it runs cool.
Also known as NAM, or nucleic acid memory, it has already burst out of the realm of science fiction. Microsoft Research (MSFT), the University of Washington, and (IBM) have all gotten it to work on a limited basis.
So far, retrieval is the biggest problem, something we ourselves do trillions of time a day every day without thinking about it.
DNA is organic, requires no silicon, and can replicate itself into infinity at zero cost. The information can last tens of thousands of years. Indeed, scientists were recently able to reconstruct the DNA from Neanderthals who lived in caves in Spain 27,000 years ago.
Yes, you can now clone your own Neanderthal. Gardening work maybe? Low-waged assembly line workers? Soldiers? Traders? I think I already know some. Look for that tell-tale supraorbital brow (click here for details).
But I diverge.
If you want to make money, like tomorrow, instead of in a decade, there are still a few possibilities on the storage front.
If you want to take a flyer on the ongoing data storage buildout, you might look at Las Vegas-based Switch (SWCH). The company IPO’d in October and has since seen its shares drop by 32%, which is normal for these small tech companies.
A much cleaner and safer play is Cisco Systems (CSCO), one of my favorite lagging old technology companies. After all, everyone needs Cisco routers on an industrial scale.\
(MARKET OUTLOOK FOR THE WEEK AHEAD, or IT'S ALL ABOUT THE NUMBERS),
(TLT), (SPY), (FCX), (QQQ), (VIX), (UUP), (AMAT), (CRM), (GOOG), (AMZN), (AAPL), (FB)
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2021-05-24 10:04:212021-05-24 12:14:46May 24, 2021
Legal Disclaimer
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.