Global Market Comments
June 12, 2015
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(JULY 31 ZERMATT, SWITZERLAND GLOBAL STRATEGY SEMINAR)
(MY OLD PAL, LEONARDO FIBONACCI),
(TESTIMONIAL)
Global Market Comments
June 11, 2015
Fiat Lux
SPECIAL ITALIAN ISSUE
Featured Trade:
(JUNE 29 LONDON STRATEGY LUNCHEON)
(WHAT TO DO ABOUT ITALY?),
(EWI), (HEDJ), (TI), (E), (FXE), (EUO)
iShares MSCI Italy Capped (EWI)
WisdomTree Europe Hedged Equity ETF (HEDJ)
Telecom Italia S.p.A. (TI)
Eni SpA (E)
CurrencyShares Euro ETF (FXE)
ProShares UltraShort Euro (EUO)
When British Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, was informed that Italy joined the side of the Germans in the Second World War, he infamously replied, "Well, that's only fair. They were our allies in the First World War."
Many investment strategists are similarly vexed today, trying to decide what to do about the home of the Roman Empire.
Since January, the Italy iShares ETF (EWI) has added a blistering 31%, handily beating the Dow, the S&P 500, and yes, even the shares of much worshipped Apple (AAPL).
The land of Cicero, Seneca, and Julius Caesar has produced one of the world's best performing stock markets. The problem is: Now What?
Has the world suddenly fallen in love with pasta, Parmesan, and polenta to deliver such performance? The answer is a little more complicated than that.
First and foremost, you can thank the plunging Euro (FXE), which at one point in April was down 25% year on year. A cheaper Euro makes Italian exports vastly more competitive.
Haven't you noticed the profusion of those cute little Fiat 500s in your neighborhood recently, both the conventional and the all-electric kind? They look like large, wind up toys.
A discount continental currency also sucks in millions more bargain-seeking tourists, the country's largest industry. Count me on the list, who lives in Europe 2-3 months a year.
Italian interest rates have also been a big help. Since the bad old days at the end of 2010, the yield on ten-year Italian government bonds has cratered, falling from 7.2% to 2.25%.
Briefly, in January, they traded as low as an incredible 1.10%. Cheaper money brings lower costs and larger profits for companies south of the Alps.
It also encourages investors to borrow money to buy assets, pushing prices northward. This is all great news for the stock market. Flip the chart of the Italian bond market for the past four years upside down, and you get a chart of the Italian stock market.
Another positive development has been the long awaited departure of bad boy prime minister, Silvio Berlusconi. Voters grew weary of the media magnate's tawdry personal behavior, relations with underage prostitutes, and criminal tax convictions.
The "Bunga Bunga" room, which I drove past on the island of Sardinia last year, is no more. In fact, Berlusconi's palatial estate there is now on the market for a staggering $630 million. Whatever happened to humility? The new, more responsible government has inspired investors to pour even more Euros into Italian shares.
Just looking at the numbers, Italy is not a country where you would rush to pour your entire life savings into. The Economist magazine expects Italy to generate a microscopic 0.6% in economic growth in 2015.
Inflation is at 0.2%. Yet the headline unemployment rate is at a monstrous 12.4%, and the real figure is probably much higher.
Europe's third largest economy disturbingly has a smaller GDP, or gross domestic product, per person than it did in 1999.
Its national debt exceeds a staggering $2.6 trillion, costing it $135 billion a year in interest, or $4,409 a second (click here for this cool Italian National Debt Clock).
Italy is almost in as much trouble as nearly bankrupt Greece.
These numbers are hardly a ringing endorsement for investment.
Italy suffers from two gigantic structural problems.
One is that they're just not making Italians anymore. Each Italian couple is producing only 0.9 children between them.
That compares to 1.9 in the US, and a replacement rate of 2.1. This means the country is suffering from a demographic implosion of biblical proportions.
The population pyramids are going from bad to worse (see below). This predicts that a shrinking young population will have to support an ever growing number of old age pensioners.
Countries with these characteristics have historically suffered from weak economies, falling currencies, burgeoning debt, and are usually terrible investments.
The second is the structural problem has plagued the European Monetary System since its inception. Before the Euro was invented in 1999, a country with a weak economy, like Italy, could simply devalue its way to prosperity.
It could also borrow and spend heavily to reflate the economy, with few consequences.
A lower currency means that its products become cheaper and more competitive in the international marketplace. Italy did exactly that, taking the Lira down from 600 to the dollar when I first visited there in the 1960s, to 1,800 just prior to its entry to the European currency block.
That effectively dropped the cost of anything you bought in Italy by two thirds, which is great for business.
Since then, all of Europe has shared a common currency, the Euro. That means that Italy now shares a currency with Germany, perennially the strongest economy on the continent.
The Germans are only interested in pursuing policies that suit a healthy economy for them. That means no borrowing and keeping a lid on inflation as a top priority.
The devaluation, borrowing, and spending tools have thus been thrown out of the Italian monetary toolbox. So while business is weak, there is not much anyone can do about it. Greece, Spain, and Portugal all face the same dilemma.
The solution to these structural problems would be for Europe to more closely mimic America by creating a true United States of Europe. An empowered and centralized Ministry of Finance would coordinate all continent wide borrowing and spending. The European Central Bank would be given vastly expanded Federal Reserve type powers.
The new agency would issue a single pan European bond, much like the Treasury bonds in the US. As a result, Germany would have to pay slightly higher interests in this brave new world. But the weaker countries would pay much lower interest rates, as the risks for such borrowing would be spread among the Community's 28 members, thus boosting their economies.
The problem is that such ground-breaking reforms would require a far greater level of trust and cooperation than the Europeans have managed until now. It has been 16 years since that last important structural change in Europe. It could take an additional 16 years before we see another big one.
Until then, Italy twists slowly in the wind.
That is, not if the new Italian Prime Minister, Matteo Renzi, has anything to say about it. The mildly socialist Democratic Party's standard bearer has behaved much like a bull in a china shop, proposing desperately needed changes for the economy as fast as his overworked printer can print them.
His goal is to bring Italy into the 21st century, kicking and screaming all the way, and end a half-century of economic torpor.
The 40 year old former mayor of Florence is now the youngest prime minister in history. He is next in line to become the president of the entire European Community. German Chancellor, Angela Merkel refers to him as the "Matador."
Renzi has already implemented important tax reform, cutting the monthly bill for low waged workers by $110 a month. Deregulation is in the air, and Renzi has promised to take the scalpel to the country's notoriously bloated bureaucracy.
It costs an eye popping $150,000 in fees and licenses to open a restaurant in central Rome. That's why your Eggplant Parmesan is so expensive these days. When I first came to the Eternal City 47 years ago, I lived on $2 a day. Now, I can barely scrape by on $2,000. (My tastes have gotten more expensive).
Renzi plans to priv atize many government entities, modernize an arthritic legal system, and bring institutional corruption to an end.
It all reminds me of when Margaret Thatcher was elected PM in 1979 and proceeded to read the riot act to her people for a decade. The London stock market skyrocketed as a result.
If Renzi is successful, the bull market in Italian stocks is not ending, it is just taking a breather before another leg up.
The easiest way to participate in the new bull market is through the iShares Italy ETF (EWI). You could also take rifle shots at single companies, based around your favorite sector call.
Fiat (FIATY.PK) is prospering from the new renaissance in the US car market, where miracle worker, Sergio Marchionne, has engineered a spectacular turnaround at its Chrysler subsidiary.
ENI (E) is a play on the global energy boom. Telecom Italia Media is your classic big cap communications play.
Luxottica Group (LUX) is the world's largest maker of eyeglass frames and gives you participation in a global consumer spending rebound.
ST Microelectronics is headquartered in Switzerland, but has the bulk of its operations in Italy, and is a favored technology bet.
If you do decide to participate in the delights of the Italian stock market, don't forget to hedge out your currency risk, as the Euro is expected to remain weak against the US dollar for years.
Eventual 1:1 parity is not out of the question. You can do this through selling short the Euro (FXE) against your Italian holdings, or via buying the short Euro 2X leveraged ETF (EUO).
Or you can let someone else do all the work for you. The Wisdom Tree Europe Hedged Equity ETF (HEDJ) buys a basket of European stocks, and hedges out the currency risk. It has been a favorite of hedge fund managers for the past year.
It all boils down to whether Italy's new young and wildly ambitious prime minister can deliver on his many promises.
As for me, it's arrivederci for now. The spaghetti carbonara beckons!
Italian Ten Year Government Bond Yields-1 Year
It's All About Renzi
Ciao, Baby!
Global Market Comments
June 10, 2015
Fiat Lux
SPECIAL GOLD AND SILVER ISSUE
Featured Trade:
(JUNE 19 DALLAS, TEXAS GLOBAL STRATEGY LUNCHEON)
(THE TERRIBLE NEWS THE BOND MARKET IS TELLING TO GOLD),
(GLD), (GDX), (SIL), (ABX), (REMX), (SLV)
SPDR Gold Trust (GLD)
Market Vectors ETF Trust - Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX)
Global X Funds - Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL)
Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX)
Market Vectors ETF - Market Vectors Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX)
iShares Silver Trust (SLV)
The news from Australia?s Perth Mint was horrific last week. The refiner for the world?s second largest producer reported that sales hit a new three year low.
And the worst is yet to come.
Shipments of gold coins and bars plunged to 21,671 ounces in May, compared to 26,545 ounces in April. Silver sales have seen similar declines.
I have been warning readers for the last four years that investors want paper assets paying dividends and interest, not the hard stuff, now that the world is in a giant reach for yield.
Ten-year US Treasury yields jumping from 1.83% to 2.43% this year is pouring the fat on the fire.
This all substantially raises the opportunity cost of owning the barbarous relic. With bond yields now forecast to reach as high as 3.0% by the end of the year, the allure of the yellow metal is fading by the day.
The gold perma bulls have a lot of splainin? to do.
Long considered nut cases, crackpots, and the wearers of tin hats, lovers of the barbarous relic have just suffered miserable trading conditions since 2011. Gold has fallen some 39% since then during one of the great bull markets for risk assets of all time.
Let me recite all the reasons that perma bulls used your money to buy the yellow metal all the way down.
1) Obama is a socialist and is going to nationalize everything in sight, prompting a massive flight of capital that will send the US dollar crashing.
2) Hyperinflation is imminent, and the return of ruinous double-digit price hikes will send investors fleeing into the precious metals and other hard assets, the last true store of value.
3) The Federal Reserve?s aggressive monetary expansion through quantitative easing will destroy the economy and the dollar, triggering an endless bid for gold, the only true currency.
4) To protect a collapsing greenback, the Fed will ratchet up interest rates, causing foreigners to dump the half of our national debt they own, causing the bond market to crash.
5) Taxes will skyrocket to pay for the new entitlement state, the government?s budget deficit will explode, and burying a sack of gold coins in your backyard is the only safe way to protect your assets.
6) A wholesale flight out of paper assets of all kind will cause the stock market to crash. Remember those Dow 3,000 forecasts?
7) Misguided government policies and oppressive regulation will bring financial Armageddon, and you will need gold coins to bribe the border guards to get out of the country. You can also sew them into the lining of your jacket to start a new life abroad, presumably under an assumed name.
Needless to say, things didn?t exactly pan out that way.
The end-of-the-world scenarios that one regularly heard at Money Shows, Hard Asset Conferences, and other dubious sources of investment advice all proved to be so much bunk.
I know, because I was once a regular speaker on this circuit. I, alone, a voice in the darkness, begged people to buy stocks instead.
Eventually, I ruffled too many feathers with my politically incorrect views, and they stopped inviting me back. I think it was my call that rare earths (REMX) were a bubble that was going to collapse was the weighty stick that finally broke the camel?s back.
By the way, Molycorp (MCP), then at $70 a share, recently announced it was considering bankruptcy. Rare earths didn?t turn out to be so rare after all.
So, here we are, five years later. The Dow Average has gone from 7,000 to 18,000. The dollar has blasted through to a 14 year high against the Euro (FXE).
The deficit has fallen by 75%. Gold has plummeted from $1,920 to $1,150. And no one has apologized to me, telling me that I was right all along, despite the fact that I am from California.
Welcome to the investment business. Being wrong never seems to prevent my competitors from prospering.
Gold has more to worry about than just falling western demand. The great Chinese stock bubble, which has seen prices double in only nine months, has citizens there dumping gold in order to buy more stocks on margin.
This is a huge headache for producers, as the Middle Kingdom has historically been the world?s largest gold buyer. As long as share prices keep appreciating, demand there will continue to ebb.
So now what?
From here, the picture gets a little murky.
Certainly, none of the traditional arguments in favor of gold ownership are anywhere to be seen. There is no inflation. In fact, deflation is accelerating.
The dollar seems destined to get stronger, not weaker. There is no capital flight from the US taking place. Rather, foreigners are throwing money at the US with both hands, escaping their own collapsing economies and currencies.
And with global bond markets having topped out, the opportunity cost of gold ownership returns with a vengeance.
All of which adds up to the likelihood that today?s gold rally probably only has another $50 to go at best, and then it will return to the dustbin of history, and possibly new lows.
I am not a perma bear on gold. There is no need to dig up your remaining coins and dump them on the market, especially now that the IRS has a mandatory withholding tax on all gold sales. I do believe that when inflation returns in the 2020?s, the bull market for gold will return for real.
You can expect newly enriched emerging market central banks to raise their gold ownership to western levels, a goal that will require them to buy thousands of tons on the open market.
Gold still earns a permanent bid in countries with untradeable currencies, weak banks, and acquisitive governments, India, another major buyer.
Remember, too, also that they are not making gold anymore, and that all of the world?s easily accessible deposits have already been mined. The breakeven cost of opening new mines is thought to be around $1,400 an ounce, so don?t expect any new sources of supply anytime soon.
These are the factors which I think will take gold to the $3,000 handle by the end of the 2020?s, which means there is quite an attractive annualized return to be had jumping in at these levels. Clearly, that?s what many of today?s institutional buyers are thinking.
Sure, you could hold back and try to buy the next bottom. Oh, really? How good were you at calling the last low, and the one before that?
Certainly, incrementally scaling in around this neighborhood makes imminent sense for those with a long-term horizon, deep pockets, and a big backyard.
Oops!
Maybe It Doesn?t Look So Good After All
Global Market Comments
June 9, 2015
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(WEDNESDAY JUNE 10 GLOBAL STRATEGY WEBINAR),
(JUNE 22 WASHINGTON DC GLOBAL STRATEGY LUNCHEON),
(THE DEATH OF MCDONALD?S),
?(MCD), (WFM) (SHAK), (CMG),
?(PNRA), (MO), (YUM)
McDonald's Corp. (MCD)
Whole Foods Market, Inc. (WFM)
Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK)
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG)
Panera Bread Company (PNRA)
Altria Group Inc. (MO)
Yum! Brands, Inc. (YUM)
Come join me for lunch for the Mad Hedge Fund Trader?s Global Strategy luncheon, which I will be conducting in Washington DC on Monday, June 22, 2015. A three-course lunch will be followed by an extended question and answer period.
I?ll be giving you my up to date view on stocks, bonds, currencies, commodities, precious metals, and real estate. And to keep you in suspense, I?ll be tossing a few surprises out there too. Enough charts, tables, graphs, and statistics will be thrown at you to keep your ears ringing for a week. Tickets are available for $217.
I?ll be arriving at 11:30 AM and leaving late in case anyone wants to have a one on one discussion, or just sit around and chew the fat about the financial markets.
The lunch will be held at an exclusive private club in the downtown area of the city near Farragut Square that will be emailed with your purchase confirmation.
I look forward to meeting you, and thank you for supporting my research. To purchase tickets for the luncheons, please go to my?online store.
McDonald?s (MCD) has always figured large in my life.
I grew up next door to one of the first five stands built in the country, in the Los Angeles metropolitan area. That?s when visionary milkshake mixer salesman, Ray Kroc, started to franchise his revolutionary new ideas for delivering fast food.
One of my fondest childhood memories was when my mother used to take us out to dinner there. At 15 cents a burger you fed seven growing kids for a buck and still had money left over for French fries. We brought our own cokes in an ice chest to save money.
I always gummed up the works by asking for a hamburger that had mustard only and no pickles. I clearly did not fit into the company?s stripped down Speedee Service business model.
In high school, I managed to land a coveted minimum wage job ($1 an hour) under the Golden Arches. I learned first hand the harsh realities of working for a living, and that you didn?t necessarily want to know how the sausage was made.
Then, the Big Mac came out, the blockbuster beef equivalent of a Saturn V rocket. Chicken McNuggets, Egg McMuffins, and Filet of Fish followed (for the Catholics on Fridays), and it seemed the company could do no wrong.
In a few decades, the company grew into the world?s largest restaurant, expanding its list of franchises to a staggering 36,000 shops in 119 countries.
It became the planet?s largest consumer of beef and potatoes in the world. Its presence is ubiquitous on US military bases around the world. Its chocolate shake is said to be able to withstand a nuclear attack.
However, since 2011, the stock has largely failed to perform, and has greatly underperformed the S&P 500. Its business model is aging. Its menu needs a major reworking.
The company has suffered sales declines at existing locations in five out of the last six quarters, with the rate of decline accelerating this year.
The problem is that people just don?t want to buy what they make anymore.
I went into a store the other day, and I was appalled. It was almost empty.
The few customers it had all seemed sick, obese, or unemployed, wearing polyester clothes. They periodically ducked outside for a quick cigarette.
They needed a double bacon cheeseburger like a hole in the head. Health was not their priority. They were a market that was literally dying.
It is becoming increasingly clear that the American market is moving beyond McDonald?s. Can the long vaunted company now play catch up?
This is the big problem. Millennials, those aged 18-34, which should be the company?s highest growth market, aren?t showing much interest in the company?s secret sauce.
They are, in fact, adopting a complete different life style that doesn?t have Ronald McDonald anywhere in it. They are very cautious in what they put in their young bodies.
Think organic, locally grown, low fat, low calorie, non-GMO, high fiber, and no artificial hormones or coloring anywhere. Think of health food, and you don?t exactly run off to a McDonald?s to eat. McDonald?s has a serious brand problem.
Organic foods are booming, seeing sales growth of 30% a year nationally, with far higher profit margins.
If you don?t believe me, look no further than the stock chart of Whole Foods (WFM) below, which at one point, saw its shares gain 116% relative to (MCD).
This is also a generation that is vastly more environmentally conscious that the Gen Xer?s and baby boomers before them. Beef is the single most environmentally destructive food product you can buy, with all the waste and methane byproducts.
One quarter pound beef patty requires a profligate 450 gallons of water to produce. That?s double the daily ration for a family of four here in drought suffering California. And who knows what the hell they are putting in it to preserve it down a very long global supply chain.
McDonald?s did make some limited progress on this front by announcing that they would no longer put ?pink slime? into their beef patties. If you don?t know what ?pink slime? is, then you don?t want to know. Suffice it to say that it is definitely not a great new marketing angle for health food nuts.
The company is also encountering ferocious competition for the fast food dollar from the new, rapidly growing ?fast casual? industry. These include Five Guys, Shake Shack (SHAK), Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG), and Panera Bread (PNRA).
These companies are all snapping up the high margin end of the market, even though any one of them is miniscule in size when compared to McDonald?s. Collectively, they are nipping at Ronald McDonald?s heels.
I can?t even get my own kids to eat at McDonald?s anymore, they preferring the legendary In and Out Burger on the West Coast (no double entendre intended), which emulates the McDonald?s stripped down menu of the early 1950?s.
(In and Out is a fascinating business story for another day, as the $2 billion, 300 stand LA based company is now controlled by a 33 year old four time married heiress named Lynsi Snyder.)
McDonald?s is one of the world?s largest and best managed companies. In 2014 it generated an impressive $4.8 billion profit on $27.4 billion in sales, producing a not too shabby net margin of 17.5%. So we?re not, by any means, talking chapter 11 material here.
But it is going ex growth, and that invites a lower stock multiple, and a lower stock price, something you, as equity investors should be aware of. Is (MCD)?s position in the Dow Average 30 at risk?
Yikes! That would be a disaster for shareholders!
The company has seen the writing on the wall. It recently brought in a new CEO, Steve Easterbrook, to shake things up. But so far, all of the changes he has implemented have been administrative in nature. There is no category killing super burger anywhere on the horizon.
McDonald?s does still have some huge advantages. Its efficiencies, purchasing power, and economies of scale are epic. But the business is so enormous that any incremental change is unlikely to move the needle on the earnings front.
It is the classic dilemma when navigating a supertanker.
Another headache arises from the snowballing minimum wage, or living wage movement, which has McDonald?s squarely in its crosshairs. This promises to be a big political campaign issue in 2016.
Several cities, like San Francisco and Seattle, have already boosted pay from $8 to $15 and hour, which would substantially increase (MCD)?s operating costs and cut its price advantage.
It is possible that McDonald?s could go the route of so many other legacy industries that were born here, and then migrated abroad when the home market disappeared. I?m thinking about cigarettes (Altria Group (MO), Kentucky Friend Chicken (YUM), and coal (PEA).
Indeed, on my last trip to China, I ate regularly at McDonald?s, and couldn?t help but notice that it had become the country?s hot high end date. But the burden of proof lies on the current management as to whether they can pull this off.
So, you won?t find me buying (MCD) shares anytime soon. If you must own it for that generous 3.6% dividend, at the very least you should be writing covered calls against your position to take in premium income to offset the lack of capital appreciation.
In the meantime, I?ll be grabbing a double cheeseburger and chocolate shake at In and Out Burger, even though the lines there can be miserable.
Watch Out, McDonald?s!
?It?s a manic depressive economy. Every other month we decide we might be in a recession,? said Kevin Hassett of the American Enterprise Institute.
Global Market Comments
June 8, 2015
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(JUNE 25 NEW YORK STRATEGY LUNCHEON)
(WHY STOCKS HATED THE MAY NONFARM PAYROLL),
(SPY), (TLT), (IWM), (FXE), (VIX),
(HAVE CALM WATERS RETURNED FOR SHIPPING STOCKS?),
($BDI), (DRYS), (SEA), (GNK),
?(RIO), (BHP), (KOL), (FXA), (EWA)
SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY)
iShares Trust - iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT)
iShares Trust - iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM)
CurrencyShares Euro Trust (FXE)
VOLATILITY S&P 500 (^VIX)
Baltic Dry Index ($BDI)
DryShips, Inc. (DRYS)
Claymore/Delta Global Shipping (SEA)
Genco Shipping & Trading Ltd. (GNK)
Rio Tinto plc (RIO)
BHP Billiton Limited (BHP)
Market Vectors Coal ETF (KOL)
CurrencyShares Australian Dollar ETF (FXA)
iShares MSCI Australia (EWA)
Legal Disclaimer
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.