Mad Hedge Technology Alerts!
The hawks are circling around 2019 chip guidance and that is bad news for chip equities.
Perusing through recent earnings reports, it's not a surprise that investors are uncertain whether tech can bail the rest of the equity market out of this slow macro malaise.
The deterioration in the macro climate has given added dependence to the tech vanguard with investors piling into large cap tech as a flight to quality ensues.
It helps when the tech sector is at the heart of every and any future business.
Names such as Amazon (AMZN) and Netflix (NFLX) are so far above their 50-day and 100-day moving averages that investors will take this mild sell-off as a healthy sign of consolidation.
This also means that traders will pin down Netflix's and Amazon's 50-day and 100-day moving averages as the line in the sand for technical support.
The equity weakness underscores that not all tech names are created equal, and firms without moats have been the leakiest.
Red Hat, the up-and-coming enterprise cloud company, became the scapegoat for mid-cap cloud companies triggering a massive sell-off dipping 14.23% instigated by weak guidance.
It was one of the first cloud snafus for a few quarters fueling an intense risk off surge in cloud and chip names.
It seems not a day goes by where the administration does not announce another provocative countermeasure to the tit-for-tat trade skirmish being played out at the highest levels of government.
Analysts have been trigger-happy as the few bears out there are incentivized to be the first one to call the peak of the chip market.
Careers are made and lost with these bold calls.
As bad as the Red Hat (RHT) miss was to the tech narrative, Micron (MU) made a big splash on its quarterly earnings report boding well for large cap tech names.
Micron beat estimates and surprised on the upside on guidance.
Micron was the first recommendation of the Mad Hedge Technology Letter at a cheap $41.
To read the first article of the Mad Hedge Fund Technology Letter about Micron, please click here.
The stock rocketed to more than $60 at the end of March and the end of May, each time dragged down by big picture headwinds.
Micron is a great long-term hold and the volatility in the stock is not for everyone.
If you want to avoid mind-numbing volatility, then stay away from chip stocks as the boom-bust nature of this sector has created a paranoia bias among analysts generating stock downgrades.
Cloud stocks are succinct, zeroing in on the few growth metrics that matter.
The guesswork involved in chip stocks is the perfect formula that leads to downgrades, because the silicon is distributed to other companies for end products of which are hard to keep tabs.
Hence, the chips industry has experienced a tidal wave of wrong analysts calls that unfairly taint chip stocks and the price action that follows.
Micron's data center cloud revenue, a huge driver of DRAM chips, were up 33% QOQ.
The cornerstone of Micron's business and the reinvestment into cloud products has made this stock best of breed in the chip sector and a top 3 chip stock of the Mad Hedge Technology Letter.
The only other stocks that compare with this outstanding growth story and that are at the cutting edge of innovation are hands down Nvidia (NVDA) and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) in that order.
Next year's profit margins are the next conundrum for the chip industry.
The huge sums of money required to stay ahead of competition could crush profitability.
Pricing is currently stable but stagnant.
The additional marginal costs could be the reason for investors to flee.
More specifically DRAM pricing for 2019 is under the microscope and soft numbers could spell doom for a company that extracts 71% of its revenue from DRAM chips.
All these negative whispers come at a time where DRAM chips are lifting Micron shares to the heavens. And if there was no international friction, the share price would be substantially higher than it is today.
As of today, the chip industry is still grappling with DRAM supply shortages causing costs per unit to spike.
When you consider that DRAM demand is so healthy that China is once again investigating large cap chip companies, investors should be jumping for joy.
These probes are unfounded and are brought about because DRAM pricing is one of the main inputs to setting up data centers and self-driving technology among other businesses.
If China is forced to pay exorbitant prices for groundbreaking chips that can only be found at American and Korean companies, it makes producing every digital end product costlier. infuriating Chinese management.
SK Hynix, Samsung, and Micron comprise more than 90% of the DRAM market, to which Chinese companies need unfettered access.
DRAM chips, unlike other hardware components, are traded on a transparent public market and the probe highlights the building anxiety if Chinese companies are priced out of this sector.
China views the price spike phenomenon in chips as entirely favoring foreign companies that lap up the DRAM profits like money falling from the sky.
Micron carves out half its sales from China, but it is untouchable because loads of chips are required to fuel its global technological supremacy initiative, which is being chipped at by the administration.
CEO of Micron Sanjay Mehrotra has continued to brush off the China threat because he knows Chinese firms cannot fabricate its products.
If this ever happened, kiss the preferential DRAM pricing goodbye, because China would flood the market with substitutes, which has happened to various end markets in the digital and non-digital ecosphere.
The investigation could end in some sort of monetary slap on the wrist and could be payback for blasting a massive hole in Chinese telecommunications hardware conglomerate ZTE's business model.
The administration's heavy-handed response to ban Chinese investment in technology is a long-term victory for Micron, SK Hynix, and Samsung, which have the DRAM market cornered.
These three companies will corner the market even more going forward thanks to help from Washington, widening each moat.
China is not short on funds; it is short on technological expertise because a generation of copy and paste youth cannot compete with the best and brightest minds in Silicon Valley.
Not only can it not compete, it cannot lure the best and brightest to the mainland capitulating local innovation standards.
Its only hope was to pay premium prices for emerging American technology and now that spigot has been turned off.
Technology is in its infancy and is in the early innings of a stunning growth trajectory with a one-way ticket to singularity.
There will be zigs and larger zags on the way. If you thought the Chinese could just ignore Micron and buy from the Koreans, you were wrong.
The relentless demand for DRAM chips is wilder than a British soccer hooligan. Cutting off access to one massive avenue of DRAM chips would be a death knell for any scalable production process that relies on heavy shipments of DRAM chips.
Although markets have been haywire lately, these developments are incredibly bullish, unless China can suddenly produce high-quality chips, which won't be anytime soon.
For the short term, try to pick up the best chip names at yearly lows as tech will not stay suppressed forever.
If you want to scale down the risk, park your funds in the best cloud tech names to weather the storm.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"We've had three big ideas at Amazon that we've stuck with for 18 years, and they're the reason we're successful: Put the customer first. Invent. And be patient," - said founder and CEO of Amazon Jeff Bezos.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
June 25, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(IT'S NOT HEAVEN FOR ALL CLOUD STOCKS)
(ORCL), (MSFT), (AMZN), (CRM), (GOOGL)
The year of the Cloud takes no prisoners.
Cloud stocks have been on a tear resiliently combating the leaky macro environment.
Many of my cloud recommendations have been outright winners such as Salesforce (CRM).
However, there are some unfortunate losers I must dredge up for the masses.
Oracle (ORCL) announced quarterly earnings and it was a real head-scratcher.
I have been banging on the table to ditch this legacy tech company since the inception of the Mad Hedge Technology Letter.
It was the April 10, 2018 tech letter where I prodded readers to stay away from this stock like the black plague.
At the time, the stock was trading at $45, click here to revisit the story "Why I'm Passing on Oracle."
The first quarter was disappointing and abysmal guidance of 1% to 3% for annual total revenue topped off a generally underwhelming cloud forecast.
Investors spotlight one part of the business requiring the utmost care and nurturing - its cloud business.
The second quarter was Oracle's chance to revive itself demonstrating to investors it is serious about its cloud direction.
What did management do?
They announced a screeching halt to the reporting of cloud revenue and it would avoid reporting on specific segments going forward.
Undoubtedly, something is wrong behind the scenes.
To withdraw financial transparency is indicative of Oracle's failure to pivot to the cloud and this has been my No. 1 gripe with Oracle.
It is simply getting pummeled by the competition of Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOGL), and Microsoft (MSFT).
Stuck with an aging legacy business focused on database software, transformation has been elusive.
To erect a giant cloak around its cloud business means that growth is far worse than initially thought to the point where it is better to sweep it under the carpet.
Instead of taking a direct hit on the chin, management decided to wriggle itself out of the accountability of bad cloud numbers.
A glaringly bad cloud business should be the cue for management to kitchen sink the whole quarter and start afresh from a lower base.
The preference to shroud itself with opaqueness is bad management. Period.
Instead of turning over a new leaf, Oracle could be penalized on future earnings reports for the way it reports financials for the simple reason it confuses analysts.
Wars were fought for less.
Bad management runs bad companies. The stock has floundered while other cloud stocks have propelled to new heights - another canary in the coal mine.
Amazon and Netflix are two examples of tech growth stocks that have celebrated all-time highs.
Even rogue ad seller Facebook broke to all-time highs lately.
The champagne is flowing for the top-level tech companies.
As expected, Oracle was punished heavily upon this news with the stock down almost 8% intraday to $42.70, and it sits throttled at $43.60 as I write this.
Diverting attention from the cloud will mire this stock in the malaise it deserves. Shielding its investors from the only numbers that really matter will give analysts a great reason to label this dinosaur stock with sell ratings.
Analysts are usually horrific stock predictors, but they will be able to wash their hands of this beleaguered stock.
Even if the stock goes up, analysts will still be geared toward sell ratings.
Oracle reported a $1.7 billion in total cloud revenue last quarter, a disappointing 9% increase QOQ.
Oracle's cloud revenue is only up 25% YOY.
For an up and coming cloud business, the minimum threshold to please investors is 20% QOQ, and the 9% QOQ expansion will do nothing to get investors excited.
The deceleration of growth is frightening for investors to stomach and Oracle's admission the cloud business is uncompetitive will detract many potential buyers from dipping in at these levels.
In short, Oracle is not growing much. There is no reason to buy this stock.
I always divert subscribers into the most innovative tech stocks because they are most in demand from investors.
Innovative inertia has reverberated through the corridors at its massive complex in Redwood City, California.
A major shake out in product development and business strategy is vital for Oracle clawing back to relevance.
This is the fourth sequential quarter with unhealthy guidance.
Much of the weakness comes from Amazon siphoning business out of Oracle.
Completed surveys suggest the conversion to AWS has one clear loser and that is Oracle.
Cloud vendors are now ramping up their smorgasbord of cloud offerings attracting more business.
The second and third cloud players, Alphabet and Microsoft, have been particularly active in M&A, attempting to make a run at AWS for pole position.
It is most likely that Oracle's capital spending will dip from $2 billion in 2017 to $1.8 billion in 2018.
Considering Salesforce spent $6.5 billion on MuleSoft, a software company integrating applications, an annual $1.8 billion capital expenditure outlay is a pittance and shows that Oracle is functioning at a pitiful scale.
Oracle won't be able to make any noteworthy transactions with such a miniscule budget.
Without enhancing its cloud offerings, Oracle will fall further behind the vanguard exacerbating cloud deceleration.
Oracle pinpointed data center expansion as the targeted cloud segment after which they would chase. Oracle will quadruple two data centers in the next two years.
One of the data centers will be placed in China collaborating with Tencent Holdings Limited to satisfy government rules requiring outsiders partnering with local companies.
Saudi Arabia is locked in for a data center, desperate to attract more tech ingenuity to the kingdom.
Saudi Arabia's iconic state-owned oil giant will form an "Aramco-Google partnership focused on national cloud services and other technology opportunities."
It will be interesting going forward to analyze the stoutness of the data center commentary considering foes such as Alphabet are boosting spending.
Alphabet quarterly spend tripled to $7.56 billion QOQ including the $2.4 billion snag of New York's Chelsea Market skyscraper Google will spin into new offices.
Alphabet has splurged on $30 billion on digital infrastructure alone in the past three years.
That bump up in infrastructure spending is to support the spike in computer power needed for the surging growth across Alphabet's ecosystem.
Apparently, Oracle is not experiencing the same surge.
If investors start to question global growth, investors will migrate into the top-grade names and the marginal names such as Oracle will be taken behind the woodshed and beaten into submission.
Oracle is much more of a sell the rally than buy the dip stock fueled by its growth deceleration challenges.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"If you don't have a mobile strategy, you're in deep turd," - said Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang.










