Global Market Comments
September 21, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(SEPTEMBER 19 BIWEEKLY STRATEGY WEBINAR Q&A),
(SPY), (VIX), (VXX), (GS), (BABA), (BIDU), (TLT), (TBT),
(TSLA), (NVDA), (MU), (XLP), (AAPL), (EEM),
(MONDAY, OCTOBER 15, 2018, ATLANTA, GA,
GLOBAL STRATEGY LUNCHEON)
Below please find subscribers’ Q&A for the Mad Hedge Fund Trader September 19 Global Strategy Webinar with my guest and co-host Bill Davis of the Mad Day Trader.
As usual, every asset class long and short was covered. You are certainly an inquisitive lot, and keep those questions coming!
Q: Do you expect a correction in the near term?
A: Yes. In fact, we may even see it in October. Markets (SPY) have been in extreme, overbought territory for a month now, the macro background is terrible, trade wars are accelerating, and interest rates are rising sharply. The only thing holding the market up is the prospect of one more quarter of good earnings, which companies start reporting next month. So once that’s out of the way, be careful, because people are just hanging on to the last final quarter before they sell.
Q: I just got out of my cannabis stock, what should I do now?
A: Thank your lucky stars you got away with that—it was an awful trade and you made money on it anyway. Stay away in droves. After all, the cannabis industry is all about growing a weed and how hard is that? This means the barriers to entry are zero. In fact, I’m thinking of growing some in my own backyard. My tomatoes do well, so why not Mary Jane?
Q: The Volatility Index (VIX) is now at $11.79—should I buy?
A: No, the rule of thumb for the (VIX) is to wait for it to sit on a bottom for one to two weeks and let some time decay work itself out. You’ll see that in the ETF, the iPath S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN (VXX). When it stops breaking to new lows, that means it’s ready for another bounce. I would wait.
Q: What do you think about banks here? Is it time to get in?
A: No, these are not promising charts. If anything, I’d say Goldman Sachs (GS) is getting ready to do a head and shoulders and go to new lows. I would stay away from financials unless I see more positive evidence. The industry is ripe for disruption from fintech, which has already started. That’s said, they are way overdue for a dead cat bounce. That’s a trade, not an investment.
Q: Would you short Alibaba (BABA) and Baidu (BIDU) here?
A: No. Shorting is what I would have done six months ago; now it’s far too late. If anything, I would be a buyer of those stocks here, based on the possibility that we will see progress or an end to the trade war in the next couple of months. If the trade wars continue, they will put the U.S. in recession next year, and then you don’t want to own stocks anywhere.
Q: Is Apple (AAPL) going to get hit by the trade wars?
A: So far, this has not been the case, but they are whistling past the graveyard right now—an obvious target in the trade wars from both sides. For instance, the U.S. could suddenly start applying a 25% import duty to iPhones from China, which would make your $1,000 phone a $1,250 phone. Similarly, the Chinese could hit it in China, restricting their manufacturing in one way or another. I’m being very cautious of Apple for this reason. The stock already has one $10 drop just because of this worry.
Q: Can the U.S. ban China from selling bonds?
A: No, they can’t. The global U.S. Treasury bond market (TLT) is international by nature—there is no way to stop the selling. It would take a state of war to reach the point where the Fed actually seizes China’s U.S. Treasury bond holdings. The last time that happened was when Iran seized the U.S. embassy in Tehran in 1979. Iran didn’t get its money back until the Iran Nuclear Deal in 2015. Before that you have to go back to WWII, when the U.S. seized all German and Japanese assets. They never got those back.
Q: What are your thoughts on the chip sector?
A: Stay away short-term because of the China trade war, but it’s a great buy on the long term. These stocks, like NVIDIA (NVDA) and Micron Technology (MU) have another double in them. The fundamentals are outrageously good.
Q: Is the market crazy, or what?
A: Yes, it is crazy, which is why I’m keeping 90% cash and 10% on the short side. But “Markets can remain irrational longer than you can stay liquid,” as my friend John Maynard Keynes used to say.
Q: What’s your take on the Consumer Staples sector (XLP)?
A: It will likely go up for the rest of the year, into the Christmas period; it’s a fairly safe sector. The uptrend will remain until it doesn’t.
Q: Should we buy TBT now?
A: No, the time to buy the ProShares Ultra Short 20+ Year Treasury ETF (TBT) was two months ago. Now is the time to sell and take profits. I don’t think 10-year U.S. Treasury yields (TLT) are going above 3.11% in this cycle, and we are now at 3.07%. Buy low and sell high, that’s how you make the money, not the opposite.
Q: Does this webinar get posted on the website?
A: Yes, but you have to log in to access it. Then hover your cursor over My Account and a drop-down menu magically appears. Click on Global Trading Dispatch, then the Webinars button, and the last nine years of webinars appear. Pick the webinar you want and click on the “PLAY” arrow. Just give us a couple of hours to get it up.
Q: Can Chinese companies use Southeast Asia as a conduit to export to the U.S.?
A: Yes. This is an old trick to bypass trade restrictions. For example, most of the Chinese steel coming into the U.S. is through third countries, like Singapore. Eventually they do get found out, at which point companies or imports from Vietnam will be identified as Chinese origin and get hit with the import duties anyway, but it could take a year or two for those illegal imports to get discovered. This has been going on ever since trade started.
Q: Will the currency crisis in Argentina and Turkey spread to a global contagion?
A: Yes, and this could be another cause of a global recession late next year. The canaries in the coal live there (EEM).
Q: Would you use the DOJ probe to buy into Tesla (TSLA)?
A: No, buy the car, not the stock as it is untradeable. This is in fact the third DOJ investigation Tesla has undergone since Trump came into office. The last one was over how they handled the $400 million they have in deposits for their 400,000 orders. It turns out it was all held in an escrow account. There are easier ways to make money. It’s a black swan a day with Tesla. This is what happens when you disrupt about half of the U.S. GDP all at once, including autos, the national dealer network, big oil, and advertising. All of these are among the largest campaign donors in the U.S.
Last quarter’s earnings report sent Netflix shares nosediving to the depths of the ocean floor, and the wreckage saw Netflix’s stock down 24% in 5 weeks.
The short-term weakness in shares was justified after Netflix miscalculated on their quarterly subscriber numbers.
Netflix is still a buy because the wreckage can be salvaged.
In fact, it was never a wreckage to begin with because Netflix boasts the highest grade online streaming product in the industry.
An industry that is benefitting from massive secular tailwinds at its back, from cord cutters and the widespread pivot to mobile platforms.
Netflix has the best product on the market because they have the best strategy – throw $8 billion on content alone and hire the best production team money can buy to churn out content.
The method to their madness has worked and the haul of 23 Emmy’s was a result of this winning formula.
The 23 Emmy’s tied HBO, whose premier series Game of Thrones is still captivating audiences with its mix of graphic sexual exploits and violent tropes.
Several of Netflix’s award winners saluted Netflix’s hands-off approach, who allow these highly paid production specialists the creative freedom to inspire audiences.
For all of Hollywood’s razzmatazz, director’s and actor’s number one major gripe has been that the leash is tight with minimal wiggle room.
It’s not straightforward to change a culture that has developed over a century.
Cross-pollinating Silicon Valley’s lean business model with Hollywood top-grade content was the trick that removed the shackles from the director’s ankles.
The end-product has been the main beneficiary.
Scoping out Netflix’s end of year lineup has viewers drooling.
The tail end of the year sees Netflix reintroduce some hard-hitting content from Orange Is The New Black, Ozark, Daredevil, Narcos, and Making a Murderer, side by side with fresh content involving Simpsons creator Matt Groening and blockbuster names like Jonah Hill and Emma Stone.
As well as shelling out $8 billion for original content, Netflix upped its marketing budget from $1.28 billion to $2 billion in 2018.
The $2 billion budget is a classy touch but at this point, this product more or less sells itself.
The brand awareness is that far-reaching.
The platform is optimized by tweaking Netflix’s proprietary recommendation algorithm herding the audience into viewing more content that the algorithm deems likely viewable.
The man who is in charge of this is Greg Peters - Netflix chief product officer.
Kelly Bennett, Netflix chief marketing officer, will work with Peters to wield the massive $2 billion marketing budget in the most effective way possible.
To insulate the company from any potential Facebook-like data slipups, Netflix poached Rachel Whetstone from Facebook to head up the public relations division.
Who said there were no winners from Facebook’s PR disaster?
Whetstone’s professional year of hell offers valuable insight into how not to pull another Facebook (FB) stinker.
She previously worked for Google and Uber and is a veteran PR spinner.
Earlier this year CEO Reed Hastings detailed the possibility of using ads in Netflix’s ad-less platform by saying this about why Netflix has no ads:
“It is a core differentiator and again we're having great success on the commercial-free path. That's what our brand is about. So we're going to continue to expand the relevance of a commercial free service around the world and make that so popular that consumers are very used to it and appreciate Netflix.”
The relevancy of his statement is more meaningful now after a recently released report confirming that Netflix is testing the usage of ads to promote its content.
This would be a huge shift in the company’s ethos, and if the algorithms give Hastings the green light, this could alienate a big chunk of their subscriber base.
In a survey conducted about the implementation of ads, 23% said they would quit the service if ads are rolled out onto Netflix’s platform.
Only 41% said they would “definitely” or “probably” keep Netflix if ads are introduced.
In the same survey, if Netflix lowers the monthly cost by $3 while integrating ads, the cancellation rate falls from 23% to 16%, and half said they would keep Netflix.
The most important number of the survey was that only 8% would cancel if they increased monthly prices by $2, but if it went up by $5, 23% would say goodbye to the streaming service.
All signs point to an incremental price increase in the near future, partly helping to offset the mind-boggling amount of content spend this year.
Netflix subscribers are still willing to absorb price increases which is a great sign for future profitability.
But it is also worth mentioning that Netflix is a profitable company now, and margins have been slowly creeping up for the past few years.
The tests demonstrate that Hastings is serious about profitability at a time when the premier profit machines in tech are Apple (AAPL) and Alphabet (GOOGL).
These two behemoths blaze the trail for the tech sector and offer important lessons on the potential future profitability of Netflix.
It will take time for Netflix to reach that level of profitability, but the pillars are in place to ramp up the monetization drive.
The treasure trove of data will surely help decision making for the management, but to make their platform more like Facebook (FB) would be a huge error of epic proportions.
It’s proven that digital ads are annoying like a swath of mosquitoes trapped in your bedroom at 2am.
To dilute the quality of their product would fly in the face of what the company represents.
So how on earth will Netflix’s shares go from the mid-$300’s and reach the glorious heights of $400-plus and stay there?
One word – India.
It’s no secret that Netflix has been charging hard to rev up international business.
India is the trump card.
India boasts around 78 million middle class dwellers who can afford Netflix’s service.
In the next two years, it’s feasible that 10% of this socioeconomic class could be tuning into Netflix.
That foothold into India could mushroom, and potentially expand with an audience whose DNA is comprised of a strong film culture.
As broad-brand broadband expansion and smartphone penetration heating up in India, Netflix’s timely arrival could make Netflix look genius.
Their arrival coincides with a slew of American tech companies looking to tap revenue out of the largest democracy in Asia.
The unrealized potential cannot be ignored.
Netflix has primed their strategy by focusing on locally-produced content that will resonate with the Indian viewer.
Netflix’s India strategy started red hot with crime thriller Sacred Games imbued with a level of unfiltered, real filmmaking unseen in India.
The dark crime drama is already facing a legal battle concerning its lusty, foul-mouthed content that presses on the outer limits of what modern Indian society can handle.
The stereotype breaking series directed by Vikramaditya Motwane and Anurag Kashyap is Netflix’s first Indian feather in their cap as Netflix looks to accelerate the momentum.
Netflix has not produced back to back quarters where they failed to meet subscriber growth forecasts since 2012.
I firmly believe Netflix will continue this successful streak and beat subscriber estimates in the third quarter.
Initial indications show that Indians have gravitated towards Netflix’s original content, and with the 2018 Russian World Cup in the history books, the path has opened up for some nice surprises to the upside.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"Health care and education, in my view, are next up for fundamental software-based transformation." – Said Silicon Valley Venture Capitalist Marc Andreessen
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
September 19, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(IBM’S SELF DESTRUCT),
(IBM), (BIDU), (BABA), (AAPL), (INTC), (AMD), (AMZN), (MSFT), (ORCL)
International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) shares do not need the squeeze of a contentious trade war to dent its share price.
It is doing it all by itself.
Stories have been rife over the past few years of shrinking revenue in China.
And that was during the golden years of China when American tech ran riot on the mainland before the dynamic rise of Baidu (BIDU), Alibaba (BABA), and Tencent, otherwise known as the BATs.
Then the Oracle of Omaha Warren Buffett drove a stake through the heart of IBM shares earlier this year by announcing he was fed up with the company’s direction and dumped a 35-year position.
Buffett unloaded all of his shares in favor of putting down an additional 75 million shares in Apple (AAPL) in the first quarter of 2018.
Topping off his Apple position now sees Buffett owning a mammoth 165.3 million total shares in the resurgent tech company.
Buffett’s shrewd decision has been rewarded, and Apple’s stock has rocketed more than 20% since he jovially declared his purchase in May.
IBM has been a rare misstep for Buffett, who took a moderate loss on his IBM position disclosing an average cost basis of $170 on 64 million shares that Berkshire bought in 2011.
IBM has flatlined since that Buffett interview, and slid around 25% since its peak in mid-2014.
IBM is grappling with the same conundrum most legacy companies deal with – top line contraction.
In 2014, IBM registered a tad under $93 billion in annual revenue, and followed up the next three years with even lower revenue.
A horrible recipe for success to say the least.
In an era of turbo-charged tech companies whose value now comprise over a quarter of the S&P, IBM has really fluffed its lines.
IBM’s prospects have been stapled to the PC market for years.
A recent JP Morgan note revealed the PC market could contract by 5% to 7% in the fourth quarter because of CPU shortages from Intel (INTC).
The report’s timing couldn’t have been worse for IBM.
The PC industry has been tanking for the past six consecutive years unable to shirk shrinking volume.
Intel is another company I have been lukewarm on lately because it is being outmaneuvered by chip competitor Advanced Micro Devices (AMD).
Even worse, this year has been a bad one for Intel’s management, which saw former CEO Brian Krzanich resign for sleeping with a coworker.
The poor management has had a spillover effect with Intel needing to delay new product launches as well.
To read more about my timely recommendation to pile into AMD in mid-August at $19, please click here.
Meanwhile, AMD shares have gone parabolic and surpassed an intraday price of $34 recently.
Investors should ask themselves, why invest in IBM when there are so many other tech companies that are growing, and growing revenue by 20% or more per year?
If IBM does manage to eke out top line growth in 2018, it will be by 1% to 2%, similar to Oracle’s recent performance.
Unsurprisingly, the price action of Oracle (ORCL) for the past year has been flatter than a bicycle ride around Beijing.
Live by the sword and die by the sword.
Thus, the Mad Hedge Technology Letter has been ushering readers into high-performance stocks that will bring technological and societal changes.
If you put a gun to my head and forced me to give sage investment advice, then the answer would be straightforward.
Buy Amazon (AMZN) and Microsoft (MSFT) on the dip and every dip.
This is a way to print money as if you had a rich uncle writing you checks every month.
Legacy tech is another story.
The IBMs and the Oracles of the world are bringing up the tech sector’s rear.
To add insult to injury, the lion’s share of IBM’s revenue is carved out from abroad, and the recent surge in the dollar is not doing IBM any favors.
IBM’s Watson initiative was billed as the savior for Big Blue.
The artificial intelligence initiative would integrate health care data into an actionable app.
The expectations were high hoping this division would drag up IBM from its long period of malaise.
IBM bet big on this division ploughing more than $15 billion into it from 2010-2015, predicting this would be the beginning of a new renaissance for the historic American company.
This game changing move fell on deaf ears and has been a massive bust.
IBM swallowed up three companies to ramp up this shift into the AI world - Phytel, Explorys, and Truven.
The treasure trove of health care data and proprietary analytics systems these companies came with were what this division needed to turn the corner.
These three companies were strong before the buy out and engineers were upbeat hoping Watson would elevate these companies to another level.
Wistfully, IBM Management led by CEO Ginni Rometty grossly mishandled Watson’s execution.
Phytel boasted 160 engineers at the time of IBM’s purchase and confusingly slashed half the workforce earlier this year.
Engineers at the firm even lamented that now, even smaller firms were “eating them alive.”
Unimpressed with the direction of the artificial intelligence division at IBM, many of these three companies’ best and brightest engineers jumped ship.
The inability for IBM to integrate Watson reared its ugly head in plain daylight when MD Anderson Cancer Center in Texas halted its Watson project after draining $62 million.
This was one of many errors that Watson AI accrued.
The failure to quicken clinical decision-making to match patients to clinical trials was an example of how futile IBM had become.
In short, a spectacular breakdown in execution mixed with an abrupt brain drain of AI engineers quickly imploded the prospect of Watson ever succeeding.
In 2013, IBM confidently boasted that Watson would be its “first killer app” in health care.
Internal leaks shined a brighter light on IBM’s subpar management skills.
One engineer described IBM’s management as having “no idea” what they were doing.
Another engineer said they were uncertain of a “road map” and “pivoted many times.”
Phytel, an industry leader at the time focusing on population health management, was bleeding money.
The engineers explained further, chiming in that IBM’s management had zero technical experience that led management wanting to create products that were “simply impossible.”
Not only were these products impossible, but they in no way took advantage of the resources these three companies had at their disposal.
Do you still want to invest in IBM?
Fast forward to today.
IBM is being sued in federal court with the plaintiff’s, former employees at the firm, claiming the company unfairly discriminated against elderly employees, firing them because of their age.
The documents submitted by the plaintiff’s state that “IBM has laid off 20,000 employees who were over the age of 40” since 2012.
This prototypical legacy company has more problems than the eye can see in every nook and cranny of the company.
If you have IBM shares now, dump them as soon as you can and run for cover.
It’s a miracle that IBM shares have eked out a paltry gain this year. And this thesis is constant with one of my overarching themes – stay away from all legacy tech firms with no cutting-edge proprietary technologies and stagnating growth.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
“Some say Google is God. Others say Google is Satan. But if they think Google is too powerful, remember that with search engines unlike other companies, all it takes is a single click to go to another search engine,” said Alphabet cofounder Sergey Brin.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
September 18, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE DANGERS OF PLAYING TECH SMALL FRY),
(FIT), (AAPL), (CRM), (FTNT), (SQ), (SNAP), (BBY)
The No. 1 complaint the Mad Hedge Fund Technology Letter receives is that I focus too much on the tech behemoths, and do not allocate much time for the needle-in-the-haystack inspirations aiming to disrupt the status quo.
Let’s get this straight – both are important.
And when a gem of a company riding the coattails of monstrous secular tailwinds comes to the fore, I do not hesitate to usher readers into the stock at a market sweet spot.
Fortunately, many of the lesser-known companies I have recommended have hit their stride such as Salesforce (CRM), Fortinet (FTNT), and Square (SQ), while I alerted readers to avoid Snap (SNAP) like the plague.
There are a lot of moving parts to say the least.
The most recent annual Apple (AAPL) product release event was emblematic of why I cannot go to the well and recommend the minnows of the tech world on a constant basis.
In 2017, Apple registered more than $229 billion in gross revenue. And under this umbrella of assets is a finely tuned operational empire that stretches like the Mongol empire of yore from best-in-class hardware to innovative software services.
Last year brought Apple a king’s ransom of profits to the tune of more than $48 billion.
Many of these upstart firms are fighting tooth and nail to surpass the $100 million gross sales mark, which is peanuts for the intimidating large tech companies.
In the process of expanding their dominion far and wide, the net they cast extends further by the day.
I hammer home the fact that these cash-rich stalwarts have an insatiable drive to initiate new businesses as a way to position themselves at the heart of each groundbreaking trend and capture fresh markets.
Some decisions are rued and some – brilliant.
At the very least, they can afford a few hits.
Algorithms, which suck up voluminous amounts of data, carry out the best decisions that software can buy.
Managers wield these finely tuned algorithms to make precise bets.
These myriads of algorithms are tweaked every day as the level of tech ingenuity snowballs incrementally with each passing day.
Enter Fitbit (FIT).
This company was first known as Healthy Metrics Research, Inc., a decisively less sexy name than its current name Fitbit.
Healthy Metrics Research, Inc. unglamorously began as did most tech companies - with little fanfare.
Its cofounders James Park and Eric Friedman identified the opportunity to jump into the sensor industry, as they saw a monstrous addressable market for future sensors in wearable smart devices.
They soon caught a bid and $400,000 flew into its coffers. They promptly marketed designs to potential investors with nothing more than a circuit board in a wooden box.
Oh, how the wearable smart device market has advanced since those early days…
All in all, the idea was good enough for some initial seed money.
At the first tech conference marketing their new sensors, they were hoping to eclipse 50 orders.
Fortuitously, the upstart firm received more than 2,000 pre-orders, and a reset upward in expectations.
With momentum at their backs, the cofounders now had the sticky situation of physically delivering the end-product to the end-user.
This involved scouring Asia for reasonable suppliers for three-odd months with “7 near death experiences” mixed in the middle of it.
Highlighting the unglamorous nature of incubation stage firms were the cofounders once quick fix sticking a “piece of foam on a circuit board to correct an antenna problem."
Somehow and some way they debuted their product at the tail end of 2009, delivering 5,000 orders with a backlog of additional orders to boot, offering the company some stress relief.
Fitbit had the best product in an industry that barely existed, and everything was rosy at their headquarters in San Francisco.
Best Buy (BBY) even adopted its products, and Fitbit watches were flying off the shelves like hotcakes.
Margins were gloriously high. The lack of threats around the corner made the company the gold standard for smartwatches.
In short, the company was having its cake and eating it, too.
In 2011, Fitbit was furiously adding to the best smartwatch on the market installing an altimeter, a digital clock and a stopwatch to its premium product.
Then came embedded Bluetooth technology: able to track steps, distance, floors climbed, calories burned, and sleep patterns.
After being embroiled in several law quagmires over big data, momentum was still at their back, and Fitbit still managed to go public.
The IPO was a roaring success and then some.
The share price rocketed to almost $50, and the firm sat pretty in the middle of 2015.
Then the company’s shares fell to pieces in one fell swoop.
Fitbit’s stock cratered more than 50% in 2016. To inject new life into the company, CEO James Park trumpeted Fitbit’s imminent face-lift that would transform the young company from a "consumer electronics company" to a "digital healthcare company."
Bad news for Fitbit. Apple planned to do the same exact thing but do it better than Fitbit.
The readjustment to Fitbit’s grand plan was to combat the original Apple smartwatch that debuted on April 24, 2015 – three years ago.
The Apple smartwatch rapidly became the dominant smartwatch in the wearable industry, selling more than 4.2 million units in just one quarter alone.
Fitbit is now trading just a smidgen over $5 today, and the devastation is far from over.
Fitbit’s shares are down almost 1,000% from its 2015 peak, stressing the dangers that minnow tech companies face getting outgunned by companies that have superior talent, unlimited resources, and top-grade management.
Not only that, Apple can integrate any wearable device linking it with the rest of its ecosystem in a heartbeat.
Even better, it does not need to develop an operating system from scratch because it can use what it already has in place - iOS.
Even if it were to run into development troubles, it would be able to throw around a wad of capital to find someone to solve idiosyncratic issues that pop up.
Yes, Tim Cook has not been the second incarnation of Steve Jobs, but he has demonstrated a natural ability to become a trustworthy steward, advancing the interests of the company, its shareholders, and most importantly its lineup of ultra-premium products.
Fitbit was enjoying its beach promenade stroll and walked into a doozy of a tsunami with little warning.
Spearheading a revival is even more daunting.
For David to outdo Goliath takes an emphatic sum of capital and a master plan to go with it.
Fitbit has neither.
The most recent Apple product launch event introduced a gem of a smartwatch, and Fitbit’s shares once again are on life support.
With each passing Apple smartwatch iteration, Fitbit experiences a new dramatic leg down in the share price.
It is almost curtains for this company.
It will be unceremoniously laid to rest in what is now quite an expansive tech graveyard of futility.
The best-case scenario is possibly salvaging itself by drastic reinvention.
It is easier said than done.
Add this company to your list of small companies obliterated by the phenomenon known as FANG, and this story gives credence to investors trying to be cute with their tech investments.
On paper it looks great until the company becomes steamrolled.
And the paper Fitbit was written on doesn’t even look all that hot with Fitbit poised to lose money until 2021.
It sounds cliché, but the network effect cannot be underestimated.
Without this powerful effect, tech investors are exposed to a demonstrably higher level of risk.
The risk of extinction.
Stay away from Fitbit shares and any dead cat bounces that shortly arise.
The Apple watch series 5 could be the dagger that finishes the walking wounded.
As an endnote, the next potential Fitbit creeping closer to the eye of the FANG storm could be the smart speaker company Sonos (SONO).
Sometimes the calm before the storm can be awfully quiet.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
“The best way to predict the future is to create it,” said influential philosopher Peter Drucker.
Global Market Comments
September 17, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE MARKET OUTLOOK FOR THE WEEK AHEAD),
(AAPL), (CBS), (EEM), (BABA), (UUP), (MSFT), (VIX), (VXX), (TLT),
(TUESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2018, MIAMI, FL, GLOBAL STRATEGY LUNCHEON)
Talking to hedge fund managers, financial advisors, and portfolio managers around the country de-risking seems to be the name of the game. It’s like they expect a category five hurricane to hit the markets tomorrow.
Even my friend, hedge fund legend David Tepper, says that the stock market is fairly valued and that he is cutting back his equity exposure. However, he is hanging onto his position in Micron Technology (MU), which he believes is deeply oversold. Will the last person to leave Dodge please turn out the lights?
You can expect a real hurricane, Florence, to impact the coming economic data. The usual pattern is for GDP growth to take an initial hit when the big storms hit, and then make back more as reconstruction and government spending kicks in. The scary thing is that there are three more hurricanes on the way.
The big event of the week was Apple’s (AAPL) roll out of its new product line, which will beat the daylights out of competitors. Think better and more expensive across the board, with the top iPhone now costing an eye-popping $1,499.
If you are Life Alert, the private company that sells safety devices to seniors, Apple just ate your lunch. Welcome to the cutthroat world of technology investing.
The drama at CBS (CBS) played out with the departure of CEO Les Moonves. He basically generated virtually all the profits for the company for the past two decades. But in this modern age not keeping your zipper zipped carries a heavy price.
A happier departure was seen by Alibaba’s (BABA) Jack Ma, China’s richest man to focus on philanthropic activity.
Emerging markets (EEM) continued their relentless meltdown, only given a brief respite by profit taking in the U.S. dollar (UUP) on Friday.
A coming strike by the United Steelworkers may mark the onset of new wage demands by labor nationwide. In the meantime, the JOLTS report hit a new all-time high with 650,000 job openings.
For the final “screw you” of the week, Trump indicated he was going forward with tariffs on another $200 billion in Chinese imports. Consumer goods will dominate the new black list in the lead up to the Christmas shopping season. Beat the Grinch and shop early!
With the Mad Hedge Market Timing Index ranging from 50 to 78 last week the market keeps trying and failing to reach new all-time highs on small volume. Volatility (VIX) hit a one-month low.
Thank goodness I took profits on my iPath S&P 500 VIX Short Term Futures ETN (VXX) long. The January $40 call options have cratered from $3.60 to only $1.96. Still, there was enough price action to allow us to take nice profits on our bond short (TLT) and Microsoft (MSFT) long. Microsoft was the top-performing Dow stock last and we got in early!
Last week, the performance of the Mad Hedge Fund Trader Alert Service forged a new all-time high. September has given us a middling return of 2.42%. My 2018 year-to-date performance has clawed its way back up to 29.43% and my trailing one-year return stands at 41.35%.
My nine-year return appreciated to 305.90%. The average annualized Return stands at 34.65%. The more narrowly focused Mad Hedge Technology Fund Trade Alert performance is annualizing now at an impressive 29.41%. I hope you all feel like you’re getting your money’s worth.
This coming week is pretty flaccid in terms of economic data releases.
On Monday, September 17, at 8:30 AM, we learn the August Empire State Manufacturing Survey.
On Tuesday, September 18, at 10:00 AM, the National Association of Homebuilders Home Price Index is released. August Home Sales is out at 10:00 AM EST.
On Wednesday September 19, at 8:30 AM, the August Housing Starts is published.
Thursday, September 20 leads with the Weekly Jobless Claims at 8:30 AM EST, which dropped 1,000 last week to 204,000.
On Friday, September 21, at 8:30 AM, we learn August Retail Sales. The Baker Hughes Rig Count is announced at 1:00 PM EST. Last week saw a gain of 7.
As for me, the harvest season in nearby Napa Valley is now in full swing, so I’ll be making the rounds picking up my various wine club memberships. Screaming Eagle check, Duckhorn check, Chalk Hill check.
Good luck and good trading.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
September 17, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(APPLE RAMPS UP ITS GAME),
(AAPL)