• support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Member Login
Mad Hedge Fund Trader
  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Luncheons
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Tag Archive for: (APPL)

Mad Hedge Fund Trader

Buy Facebook on the Dip?

Tech Letter

A company such as Facebook (FB) simply must be on investors’ radar all the time because of the profitability element to it.

In a truncated period where growth stocks are out of favor, these bottom-line tech behemoths can weather the storm.

This tech firm doesn’t produce any real products because the user is the product.

A favorable expense layout is why net income this past quarter was $9.5 billion on $26.17 billion revenue.

Even a grossly profitable company such as Apple (AAPL) does a lot worse per dollar generated.

For every $3.79 billion in revenue at Apple, they only profit $1 billion, which is great compared to the status quo except Facebook.

Yes, it costs money to source raw materials and supplies to construct iPhones, iPads, and iMacs, which makes Apple’s operation much more impressive than Facebook.

Strip the hassle of making stuff like iPhones and iMacs and you have Facebook, an online portal to post stuff and serves no real purpose but to display ads to people.

Their attempts to get into the device and ecosystem games have utterly fizzled because users simply have no trust in Facebook management and how they fumble around personal data.

Why buy a Facebook Portal, the firms’ microphone video tablet, when there are trustful options out there without sacrificing the quality?

Before releasing the Portal, during the product announcement, Facebook initially claimed that data obtained from Portal devices would not be used for targeted advertising.

One week after the announcement, Facebook changed its position and stated that “usage data such as length of calls, frequency of calls” and “general usage data, such as aggregate usage of data will also feed into the information that we use to serve ads”.

So Facebook is quite stuck with what they have now, which is a blossoming Instagram and legacy Facebook portal both of which are cash cows.

They aren’t able to do M&A because of fear of anticompetitive legislation and their debauchery of privacy has locked them out of the hardware market.

Facebook wants to monetize WhatsApp, Facebook’s wildly popular chat app, but is finding resistance in funneling user data with an updated user agreement being criticized heavily worldwide with users deleting the app and downloading an alternative mainly the app Telegram.

Facebook rescinded the user agreement and has delayed their WhatsApp targeting ad division until they can ram the updated agreement down WhatsApp users’ throats. 

I will say that “what they have” has been working out extremely well for the company when Facebook reported daily active users reaching 1.88 billion, up 8% or 144 million compared to last year.

Q1 total revenue was $26.2 billion, up 48% and this is attributed to growth in advertising revenue largely driven by continued strength in product verticals such as online commerce.

If investors don’t remember, Facebook was dragged down to the 20% revenue growth level just a few quarters ago on all the privacy hullabaloo.

To reaccelerate revenues is a major win for Facebook that can’t be understated.

Growth was broad-based across all advertiser sizes, with particular strength from small- and medium-sized advertisers.

Facebook’s year-over-year ad revenue growth also benefited from lapping pandemic-related demand headwinds experienced during March of last year. On a user geography basis, ad revenue growth accelerated in all regions.

Facebook’s bread and butter are the strength of their advertising revenue growth in the first quarter of 2021, which was driven by a 30% year-over-year increase in the average price per ad and a 12% increase in the number of ads delivered.

What is Facebook doing to branch out revenue channels?

They haven’t quit the hardware game with their Virtual Reality (VR) headset product called Oculus Quest 2 and management only played it down by saying they saw “sustained strength” without busting out any specific metrics.

I read the tea leaves as this isn’t doing enough for management to offer real data on it.

When I analyze the Oculus Quest 2 VR headset, the $299 retail price, it practically means they are losing money on it by a wide margin.

There is no premium in the pricing because the price is one of the few ways that consumers can overlook data privacy issues.

The $299 gets you a robust virtual reality headset with 6GB of RAM, a Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2 CPU, 64GB of storage, 1832x1920 per eye display, and a pair of controllers. 

The jury is out whether the stickiness of VR will actually continue and if it does, how long full-scale adoption will take.

But it is painfully clear that Facebook will be losing money even on Oculus Quest products until there’s a 5th or 6th or even 7th iteration or even further.

There is nothing to suggest that VR is on the verge of full-scale adoption.

CEO and Founder Mark Zuckerberg must be tearing his hair out about how he has effectively been locked out of hardware products since the inception of his empire.

And no, data centers, their largest expense along with remunerations, to hold the data you give him don’t count as hardware.

A few headwinds to take note of, in the third and fourth quarters of 2021, Facebook expects year-over-year total revenue growth rates to significantly decelerate sequentially as they are facing tough comparable data from the prior year.

Lastly, Facebook will continue to expect increased ad targeting headwinds in 2021 from regulatory and platform changes, notably the recently launched Apple iOS 14.5 update, which will have an impact in the second quarter.

As the global economy and US economy open back up in a roaring fashion, it’s hard not to like this stock.

Ad budgets are on the verge of exploding and Facebook is still one of a nicely forged duopoly.

Even if they haven’t been able to branch out, they are incredibly proficient at what they do, and serving ads to a 2 billion plus user base will become more voluminous and expensive as the year advances.

No surprise the stock is at $325, another all-time high, and even if I personally hate the company, the stock is a viable candidate to buy on any dip.

As we move into the next part of the year, I do believe the buyback story will accelerate for big tech and cash cows like Facebook, and its stock will hit $400 by the year-end.

At the end of the day, this a story of the big getting bigger.

 

OCULUS QUEST 2 – THE NEXT DISASTROUS FACEBOOK HARDWARE?

 

facebook

 

facebook

 

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/fbhardware.png 392 658 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2021-05-03 14:02:532021-05-05 01:01:50Buy Facebook on the Dip?
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

January 8, 2021

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
January 8, 2021
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(UNSTOPPABLE FACEBOOK)
(AMZN), (FB), (APPL), (MSFT), (GOOGL)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2021-01-08 11:04:052021-01-08 11:42:04January 8, 2021
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

Unstoppable Facebook

Tech Letter

Salacious TikTok ads portraying perceived underaged girls shown to middle-aged men?

Yes, you guessed Facebook’s algorithm correctly.

But it doesn’t matter.

No matter what you throw at Facebook and Big Tech, they will get away with it.

The ability to hone narratives and control our communication channels means they can reroute anything remotely resembling a con and spin it into a pro.

As Facebook has encouraged misinformation to spread, including from US President Donald Trump, they come in when you least expect it to play both sides as they announced they will ban the President from Facebook.

An unruly mob of President Donald Trump's supporters stormed the Capitol to disrupt the election certification process and Facebook has finally banned the US President’s account.

Four people died — one was shot by police, and three died during medical emergencies.

Jake Angeli, a well-known QAnon influencer dubbed the "Q Shaman," seemed to be giving out orders in the Capitol sporting a Viking-like horned fur helmet and shirtless chest.

Google CEO Sundar Pichai called it the "antithesis of democracy" in an internal memo and Facebook removed a video of Trump spreading baseless claims of election fraud. The platform then blocked Trump from posting content for 24 hours.

Ironically enough, Facebook blocked employees from commenting on posts on its internal messaging boards discussing the ban showing how little employees can do in national crises.

Facebook employees also lashed out at Facebook’s lack of speed and aggressiveness in dealing with the situation.

I spoke to several employees at Facebook and they admit in unison that Facebook is an absolutely terrible place to work and executive intimidation is something workers must put up with because it is precisely the working culture in place when they walk in the door.

Even former Facebook security chief Alex Stamos chimed in saying Trump needed to be blackballed from Facebook and Twitter.

Zuckerberg did later send out a note that said, “peaceful transition of power is critical to the functioning of democracy, and we need our political leaders to lead by example and put the nation first.”

Zuckerberg doesn’t really need to say much but stay politically correct because he does most of his speaking with the action and non-action at the helm of the ship.

If you dig deeper, his flatform is utterly disgusting, and investors shouldn’t be surprised by the handling of this event.

Facebook’s handling of TikTok’s ads is one of many examples of its advertising system gone bonkers, and the company's ongoing prioritization of revenue over the safety of its 3 billion users, the public good, and the integrity of its own platform.

Middle-aged men using Facebook are fed a voracious stream of TikTok ads displaying skimpy teenage girls and even if they contact Facebook to stop it, Facebook won’t change a thing.

Besides the subliminal advertising in areas that could lead to predatory behavior, consumers are sold goods they never receive or are lured into financial scams; legitimate advertisers’ accounts or pages are hacked and used to peddle those nonexistent goods or scams; credit card numbers are stolen.

The one constant here is that Facebook doesn’t refund any of this malicious behavior and in fact, encourages it.

Facebook agreed to an implicit pact with scammers, hackers, and disinformation peddlers who use its platforms to rip off and manipulate people around the world.

Prioritizing revenue over the enforcement of policies is beginning to be the legacy of Big Tech.

The Facebook “moderators” are a small army of low-paid, unempowered contractors to manage a daily onslaught of ad moderation and policy enforcement decisions that often have far-reaching consequences for its users.

They are much more worried about losing their $15 per hour job than challenging the powerful overlords at Facebook.

And that’s not the beginning of it; Facebook's ad workers have at times been told to ignore suspicious behavior unless it “would result in financial losses for Facebook.”

Non-enforcement helped Facebook become the preferred platform of unscrupulous affiliate marketers and drop shippers that target people with financial scams, trick them into expensive subscriptions, or use false claims and trademark infringement.

Bought products often never arrive.

Facebook’s “best” practices constitute of looking the other way, even if an account is hacked, and only caring about business if credit chargebacks are threatened.

I have also been told by former Facebook employees that they are instructed to be “more lenient with accounts originating in Russia, Ukraine, and China.”

This episode truly shows why investors should still buy big tech.

They are unstoppable to such an extreme that most people can’t comprehend. Rules don’t apply to them.

And it’s not just Facebook, there are mounting headaches for all these CEOs that won’t affect the bottom line and in fact, offer these corporations a great chance to cut costs.  

On January 4th, 2021, Google workers and contractors announced they were forming a union with the Communications Workers of America.

It’s the latest move in an ongoing fight between Google workers and management, and it could trigger a giant offshoring to cheap labor countries.

If most of America’s supply chain was offshored and never came back, then why can’t tech do it as well?

Why do they need to pay $150,000 to an employee in California when they can hire the same level of talent in Moldova for 20% of the cost?

That proves my point because whatever hurdles are set in front of big tech, they know how to maneuver around and avoid any deep carnage.

If investors know there will always be fix out there, even with the egregious behavior at Facebook, they won’t hesitate to pile into Big Tech.

Washington riots simply don’t matter, and markets took wind of it.

I am bullish the Big 5 of Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, Amazon, and Google.

facebook

 

 

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2021-01-08 11:02:002021-01-10 21:38:39Unstoppable Facebook
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

January 6, 2021

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
January 6, 2021
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(THE INSATIABLE GROWTH OF THE MOBILE BASE STATION MARKET)
(MRVL), (NOK), (KRX: 005930)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2021-01-06 10:04:332021-01-06 10:57:11January 6, 2021
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

January 4, 2021

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
January 4, 2021
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(SPLINTERNET GOES FROM BAD TO WORSE IN 2021)
(AMZN), (APPL), (TIKTOK), (TWTR), (MSFT), (GOOGL), (FB)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2021-01-04 12:04:362021-01-04 12:33:53January 4, 2021
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

Splinternet Goes From Bad to Worse in 2021

Tech Letter

The balkanization of the internet is exploding in the short-term, knocking off the aggregated value of U.S. Fortune 500 companies in one fell swoop.

In technology terms, this is frequently referred to as “splinternet.”

A quick explanation for the novices can be summed up by saying the splinternet is the fragmenting of the Internet, causing it to divide due to powerful forces such as technology, commerce, politics, nationalism, religion, and interests.

What investors are seeing now is a hard fork of the global tech game into a multi-pronged world of conflicting tech assets sparring for their own digital territory.

The epicenter of balkanization is the division between China and the U.S. tech economy with India as the wild card.

This is fast becoming a winner-take-all affair.

Silicon Valley is winning in India due to border conflicts along the Himalayan Corridor.

India took count of 20 dead Indian soldiers felled by the Chinese Army stoking a wave of national outcry against regional rival China.

The backlash was swift with the Indian government banning 59 premium apps developed by China citing “national security and defense.”

The ban included the short-form video platform TikTok, which counts India as its biggest overseas market.

TikTok was projected to easily breeze past 500 million Indian users by the end of 2021 and was clearly hardest hit out of all the apps.

India is the second biggest base of global internet users with nearly half of its 1.3 billion population online.

The government rolled out the typical national security playbook saying that the stockpiling of local Indian data in Chinese servers undermines national security.

China’s inroads in the Indian tech market are set to wane with recent rulings already impacting roughly one in three smartphone users in India. TikTok, Club Factory, and UC Browser among other apps in aggregate tally more than 500 million monthly active users in May 2020.

Highlighting the magnitude of this purge - 27 of these 59 apps were among the top 1,000 Android apps in India.

China dove headfirst into the Indian market with their smartphones, apps, and an array of hardware equipment. Now, that is all on hold and looks like a terrible mistake.

Chinese smartphone makers command more than 80% of the smartphone market in India, which is the world’s second largest.

One of the reasons Apple (AAPL) could never make any headway in China is because they were constantly undercut by predatory Chinese phone makers with stolen technology.

It’s also not smooth saying for domestic Chinese tech as Chinese Chairman Xi reign in the private sector with Alibaba’s founder Jack Ma’s whereabouts unknown as we start the new year.

This is happening on the heels of the Chinese Communist Party thwarting the Alipay IPO in Shenzhen which was posed to become the biggest IPO ever.

TikTok is also being eyed-up for bans in Europe and the United States recently as it constantly curries to Beijing’s every whim by banning content unfavorable to the Chinese communist party and rerouting data back to servers in China.

Chinese tech is clearly the main loser for their government’s “distract its own people at all costs” campaign to shield themselves from the epic contagion of the lingering pandemic.

What does this mean for American tech?

For one, India is strengthening ties with the U.S., being the biggest democracy in Asia, and will be a massive foreign policy loss and loss of face for the Chinese communist regime.

The resulting losses for Chinese tech will usher in a new generation of local Indian tech with Silicon Valley mopping up the leftovers.

Even though the U.S. avoided the carnage from this round of balkanization, the situation in Europe is tenuous, to say the least.

Fault lines will compound the problem of a multinational tech revenue machine and the relationship with France is on the verge of becoming fractious.

The relationship is worsening with the Europeans by a trade deal consummated between the EU and China along with Western European powers such as France, Germany, and Britain looking to add to their tax coffers by taxing big tech companies like Facebook (FB), Twitter (TWTR), Google (GOOGL) in 2021.

This would be a massive blow to not only revenue streams but also global prestige for American tech.

Not only do Silicon Valley leaders see a murky future outside its borders, but digital territories are also getting carved out as we speak domestically.

Amazon (AMZN)-owned Twitch and Twitter have clamped down on U.S. President Donald Trump’s account.

This could quickly spiral into a left-versus-right war in which there are competing apps for different political beliefs and for every subgenre of apps.

This would effectively mean a balkanization of tech assets within U.S. borders and division in 2021 is set to extend itself.

Silicon Valley wants products sold to the largest addressable market possible and that simply won’t happen in 2021.

The balkanization of the internet is now turning into an equally high risk as the antitrust and regulatory issues.

The issues keep piling up, but nothing has been able to topple big tech yet as they lead the broader market out of the pandemic.

Silicon Valley is still subsidized by ultra-low interest rates and quantitative easing by the Fed. If this changes, look for tech to roll over.

Let’s hope that never happens.  

balkanization

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/US-China.png 396 708 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2021-01-04 12:02:342021-01-09 23:57:46Splinternet Goes From Bad to Worse in 2021
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

December 28, 2020

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
December 28, 2020
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(ECOMMERCE AND THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM)
(AMZN), (APPL), (WMT), (TGT), (SHOP), (APPL), (MSFT), (GOOGL)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2020-12-28 13:04:262020-12-28 13:14:22December 28, 2020
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

Ecommerce and the University System

Tech Letter

The genie is out of the bottle and life will never go back to pre-Covid ways. 

Excuse me for dashing your hopes if you assumed the economy, society, and travel rules would do a 180 on a dime.

They certainly will not.

The messiness of distributing the vaccine is already rearing its ugly head with Germany botching the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine delivery, deploying refrigerators that weren’t cold enough.

Moving on to tomorrow’s tech and the decisive trends that will power your tech portfolio, you can’t help but think about what will happen to the American university system.

A bachelor’s degree has already been devalued as traditional academics trumped by the digital economy invading its turf.

Another unstoppable trend that shows no signs of abating is the “winner take all” mentality of the tech industry.

Tech giants will apply their huge relative gains to gut different industries and have set academics and the buildings they operate from as one of their next prey.

Recently, we got clarity on big-box malls becoming the new tech fulfillment centers with the largest mall operator in the United States, Simon Property Group (SPG), signaling they are willing to convert space leftover in malls from Sears and J.C. Penny.

The next bombshell would hit sooner rather than later.

College campuses will become the newest of the new Amazon (AMZN), Walmart (WMT), or Target (TGT) eCommerce fulfillment centers, and let me explain to you why.

When the California state college system shut down its campuses and moved classes online due to the coronavirus in March, rising sophomore Jose Antonio returned home to Vallejo, California where he expected to finish his classes and “chill” with friends and family.

Then Amazon announced plans to fill 100,000 positions across the U.S at fulfillment and distribution centers to handle the surge of online orders. A month later, the company said it needed another 75,000 positions just to keep up with demand. More than 1,000 of those jobs were added at the five local fulfillment centers. Amazon also announced it would raise the minimum wage from $15 to $17 per hour through the end of April.

Antonio, a marketing and communications major, jumped at the chance and was hired right away to work in the fulfillment center near Vacaville that mostly services the greater Bay Area. He was thrilled to earn extra spending money while he was home and doing his schoolwork online.

This was just the first wave of hiring for these fulfillment center jobs, and there will be a second, third, and fourth wave as eCommerce volumes spike.

Even college students desperate for the cash might quit academics to focus on starting from the bottom at Amazon.

Even though many of these jobs at Amazon fulfillment centers aren’t those corner office job that Ivy League graduates covet, in an economy that has had the bottom fall out from underneath, any job will do.

Chronic unemployment will be around for a while and jobs will be in short supply.

Not only is surging unemployment a problem now, but a snapshot assessment led by the U.S. Census Bureau and designed to offer less comprehensive but more immediate information on the social and economic impacts of Covid showed that as recently as the period between November 25 and December 7 (including Thanksgiving), some 27 million adults—13 percent of all adults in the country—reported their household sometimes or often didn’t have enough to eat.

Yes, it’s that bad out there right now.

When you marry that up with the boom in ecommerce, then there is an obvious need for more ecommerce fulfillment centers and college campuses would serve as the perfect launching spot for this endeavor.

The rise of ecommerce has happened at a time when the cost of a college education has risen by 250% and more often than not, doesn’t live up to the hype it sells.

Many fresh graduates are mired in $100,000 plus debt burdens that prevent them from getting a foothold on the property ladder and delay household formation.

Then consider that many of the 1000s of colleges that dot America have borrowed capital to the hills building glitzy business schools, $100 million football locker rooms, and rewarding the entrenched bureaucrats at the school management level outrageous compensation packages.

The cost of tuition has risen by 250% in a generation, but has the quality of education risen 250% during the same time as well?

The answer is a resounding no, and there is a huge reckoning about to happen in the world of college finances.

America will be saddled with scores of colleges and universities shuttering because they can’t meet their debt obligations.

The financial profiles of the prospective students have dipped by 50% or more in the short-term with their parents unable to find the money to send their kids back to college, not to mention the health risks.

Then there is the international element here with the lucrative Chinese student that added up to 500,000 total students attending American universities in the past.

They won’t come back after observing how America basically ignored the pandemic and the U.S. public health system couldn’t get out of the way of themselves after the virus was heavily politicized on a national level.

The college campuses will be carcasses with lots of meat on the bones that will let Jeff Bezos choose the prime cuts.

This will happen as Covid’s resurgence spills over into a second academic calendar and schools realize they have no pathway forward and look to liquidate their assets.

There will be a meaningful level of these college campuses that are repurposed as eCommerce delivery centers with the best candidates being near big metropolitan cities that have protected white-collar jobs the best.

The coronavirus has exposed the American college system, as university administrators assumed that tuition would never go down.

The best case is that many administrators will need to drop tuition by 50% to attract future students who will be more price-sensitive and acknowledge the diminishing returns of the diploma.

Not every college has a $40 billion endowment fund like Harvard to withstand today’s financial apocalypse.

It’s common for colleges to have too many administrators and many on multimillion-dollar packages.

These school administrators made a bet that American families would forever burden themselves with the rise in tuition prices just as the importance of a college degree has never been at a lower ebb.

Like many precarious industries such as nursing homes, commercial real estate, hospitality, and suburban malls, college campuses are now next on the chopping block.

Big tech not only will make these campuses optimized for delivery centers but also gradually dive deep into the realm of digital educational revenue, hellbent on hijacking it from the schools themselves as curriculum has essentially been digitized.

Just how Apple has announced their foray into cars, these same companies will go after education.

Colleges will now have to compete with the likes of Google (GOOGL), Facebook (FB), Amazon (AMZN), Apple (AAPL), and Microsoft (MSFT) directly in terms of quality of digital content since they have lost their physical presence advantage now that students are away from campus.

Tech companies already have an army of programmers that in an instance could be rapidly deployed against the snail-like monolith that is the U.S. university system.

The only two industries now big enough to quench big tech’s insatiable appetite for devouring revenue are health care and education.

We are seeing this play out quickly, and once tech gets a foothold literally and physically on campus, the rest of the colleges will be thrust into an existential crisis of epic proportions with the only survivors being the ones with large endowment funds and a global brand name.

It’s scary, isn’t it?

This is how tech has evolved in 2020, and the tech iteration of 2021 could be scarier and even more powerful than this year’s. Imagine that!

 

colleges and ecommerce

 

colleges and ecommerce

 

colleges and ecommerce

 

 

AMAZON PACKAGES COULD BE DELIVERED FROM HERE SOON!

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2020-12-28 13:02:242020-12-30 17:05:37Ecommerce and the University System
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

December 21, 2020

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
December 21, 2020
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(THE BEST WAY TO SUPERCHARGE YOUR TECH PORTFOLIO)
(NVDA), (PLTR), (AMD), (APPL), (OTC:SFTBF), (INTC), (QCOM)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2020-12-21 12:04:322020-12-21 12:11:55December 21, 2020
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

The Best Way to Supercharge Your Tech Portfolio

Tech Letter

Superiority is mainly about taking complicated data and finding perfect solutions for it. Trading in technology stocks is no different.

Investing in software-based cloud stocks has been one of the seminal themes I have promulgated since the launch of the Mad Hedge Technology Letter way back in February 2018.

Well, if you thought every tech letter until now has been useless, this is the one that should whet your appetite.

Instead of racking your brain to find the optimal cloud stock to invest in, I have a quick fix for you and your friends.

Invest in The WisdomTree Cloud Computing Fund (WCLD) which aims to track the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud Index (EMCLOUD).

What Is Cloud Computing?

The “cloud” refers to the aggregation of information online that can be accessed from anywhere, on any device remotely.

Yes, something like this does exist and we have been chronicling the development of the cloud since this tech letter’s launch.

The cloud is the concept powering the “shelter-at-home” trade which has been hotter than hot in 2020.

Cloud companies provide on-demand services to a centralized pool of information technology (IT) resources via a network connection.

Even though cloud computing already touches a significant portion of our everyday lives, the adoption is on the verge of overwhelming the rest of the business world due to advancements in artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things (IoT) hyper-improving efficiencies.

The Cloud Software Advantage

Cloud computing has particularly transformed the software industry.

Over the last decade, cloud Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) businesses have dominated traditional software companies as the new industry standard for deploying and updating software. Cloud-based SaaS companies provide software applications and services via a network connection from a remote location, whereas traditional software is delivered and supported on-premise and often manually. I will give you a list of differences to several distinct fundamental advantages for cloud versus traditional software.

Product Advantages

Speed, Ease, and Low Cost of Implementation – cloud software is installed via a network connection; it doesn’t require the higher cost of on-premise infrastructure setup and installation.

Efficient Software Updates – upgrades and support are deployed via a network connection, which shifts the burden of software maintenance from the client to the software provider.

Easily Scalable – deploying via a network connection allows cloud SaaS businesses to grow as their units increase, with the ability to expand services to more users or add product enhancements with ease. Client acquisition can happen 24/7 and cloud SaaS companies can more easily expand into international markets.

Business Model Advantages

High Recurring Revenue – cloud SaaS companies enjoy a subscription-based revenue model with smaller and more frequent transactions, while traditional software businesses rely on a single, large, upfront transaction. This model can result in a more predictable, annuity-like revenue streams making it easy for CFOs to solve long-term financial solutions.

High Client Retention with Longer Revenue Periods – cloud software becomes embedded in client workflow, resulting in higher switching costs and client retention. Importantly, many clients prefer the pay-as-you-go transaction model, which can lead to longer periods of recurring revenue as upselling product enhancements does not require an additional sales cycle.

Lower Expenses – cloud SaaS companies can have lower R&D costs because they don’t need to support various types of networking infrastructure at each client location.

I believe the product and business model advantages of cloud SaaS companies have historically led to better margins, growth, higher free cash flow, and efficiency characteristics as compared to non-cloud software companies.

How does the WCLD ETF select its indexed cloud companies?

Each company must satisfy critical criteria such as they must derive the majority of revenue from business-oriented software products, as determined by the following checklist.

+ Provided to customers through a cloud delivery model – e.g., hosted on remote and multi-tenant server architecture, accessed through a web browser or mobile device, or consumed as an application programming interface (API).

+ Provided to customers through a cloud economic model – e.g., as a subscription-based, volume-based, or transaction-based offering Annual revenue growth, of at least:

+ 15% in each of the last two years for new additions

+ 7% for current securities in at least one of the last two years

Some of the stocks that would epitomize the characteristics of a WCLD stock are Salesforce, Microsoft, Amazon-- I mean, they are all up, you know, well over 100% from the nadir we saw in March and contain the emerging growth traits that make this ETF so robust.

If you peel back the label and you look at the contents of many tech portfolios, they tend to favor some of the large-cap names like Amazon, not because they are “big” but because the numbers behave like emerging growth companies even when the law of large numbers indicate that to push the needle that far in the short-term is a gravity-defying endeavor.

We all know quite well that Amazon isn't necessarily a direct play on cloud computing, but the elements of its cloud business are nothing short of brilliant.

But ETF funds like WCLD, what they look to do is to cue off of pure plays and include pure plays that are growing faster than the broader tech market at large. So you're not going to necessarily see the vanilla tech of the world in that portfolio. You're going to see a portfolio that's going to have a little bit more sort of explosive nature to it, names with a little more mojo, a little bit more risk because you're focusing on smaller names that have the possibility to go parabolic and gift you a 10-bagger.

One stock that has the chance of a 10-bagger is my call on Palantir (PLTR).

Palantir is a tech firm that builds and deploys software platforms for the intelligence community in the United States to assist in counterterrorism investigations and operations, and my call was to buy them at $10 after it’s IPO, it's up to $26 and has an easy pathway to $50.

This is one of the no-brainers that procure revenue from Democrat and Republican administrations even though its CEO Alex Karp has been caught on video making fun of the current administration’s leaders.

In a global market where the search for yield couldn’t be tougher right now, right-sizing a tech portfolio to target those extraordinary, extra-salacious tech growth companies is one of the few ways to produce alpha without overleveraging.

No doubt there will be periods of volatility, but if a long-term horizon is something suited for you, this super-growth strategy is a winner and don’t forget about PLTR while you’re at it.

cloud software

 

 

cloud software

 

cloud software

 

cloud software

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2020-12-21 11:02:042020-12-23 17:21:23The Best Way to Supercharge Your Tech Portfolio
Page 6 of 10«‹45678›»

tastytrade, Inc. (“tastytrade”) has entered into a Marketing Agreement with Mad Hedge Fund Trader (“Marketing Agent”) whereby tastytrade pays compensation to Marketing Agent to recommend tastytrade’s brokerage services. The existence of this Marketing Agreement should not be deemed as an endorsement or recommendation of Marketing Agent by tastytrade and/or any of its affiliated companies. Neither tastytrade nor any of its affiliated companies is responsible for the privacy practices of Marketing Agent or this website. tastytrade does not warrant the accuracy or content of the products or services offered by Marketing Agent or this website. Marketing Agent is independent and is not an affiliate of tastytrade. 

Legal Disclaimer

There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.

Copyright © 2025. Mad Hedge Fund Trader. All Rights Reserved. support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • FAQ
Scroll to top