• support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Member Login
Mad Hedge Fund Trader
  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Luncheons
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Tag Archive for: (GE)

Mad Hedge Fund Trader

It?s Pedal to the Metal Once Again

Newsletter

If the prospect of WWIII can?t knock this market down, what will it take? A giant asteroid that destroys the earth?

I would have used ?Balls to the Wall? in the headline for this piece. But as this is a family oriented newsletter I opted for the more politically correct screamer.

Even the most hardened and seasoned traders, like me and Mad Day Trader Jim Parker, were stunned by how fast the markets bounced back from Monday?s war scares in the Ukraine. Of course, everything I said in my Monday letter came true.

It would have been nice if the recovery stretched out over a longer period of time, giving me better entry points for my Trade Alerts. But that was not to be. Too many people are still frantically trying to get in this market. There are oceans of cash everywhere earning virtually nothing. It seems the new trading strategy is that if something hasn?t gone down for three days, you buy it.

Bizarre as it may seem, the weather is emerging as the big driver of markets this year. Even the Federal Reserve is now saying that the weather was a big drag on the economy. This means that every negative data point for the next few months has a great excuse to be ignored.

It also means the growth which was lost in Q1 will get added back in during Q2 as the economy plays catch up. This has the potential to create a growth surge, possibly from a 1% annualized rate to as much as a 5% in the spring.

It is inevitable that this would trigger a major spike up in all risk assets. This realization is rippling throughout the markets to create one of those ?Aha? moments, much like we saw last October, when it became obvious that the indexes would melt up for the rest of 2013. Fasten your seat belt!

If you have any doubts about this scenario, you better take a look at the commodities markets, both hard and soft (DBA). After a dreadful three years, the chart now has the trajectory of a bat out of hell. What might cause this? How about a global synchronized economic recovery that boost US growth by a full 100 basis points or higher in 2014?

So I am going to take advantage of the pre Friday nonfarm payroll doldrums to start loading the boat with positions and scaling up risk. That?s why I picked up General Electric (GE) and Delta Airlines (DAL) today, classic cyclical names. Also on the short list are EBAY (EBAY), Gilead Sciences (GILD) for another visit to the trough, Goldman Sachs Group (GS), and QUALCOMM (QCOM).

Today?s new trades graciously turned immediately profitable, taking my performance up to yet another all time high of 134.41% since inception, and a 2014 year to date gain of 11.91%. That improves my average annualized return to a stratospheric 41.4%. Incredibly, after last year?s torrid 68% profit, my performance is getting even better. It appears that, like a fine Napa Valley wine, I improve with age.

Yes, I know you have been told by the talking heads on TV that stocks are expensive, and that a crash is imminent. Personally, I think equities are cheap and that we are on our way to a Dow Average of 100,000-200,000 by 2030 (no typo here). I will keep that view as long as the stocks that I am buying pay higher dividends than the ten-year Treasury yield (TLT), now at 2.69%.

To support my view take a look at the chart below produced by my friends at Business Insider. It shows that the share of technology names, the lead sector for the entire market, trading at more than five times sales is below 40%, a fraction of the 2000 peak.

I think we have to match, or exceed, this peak before the party is over and the lights get turned out.

GE 3-5-14

DAL 3-5-14

DBA 3-5-14

Markets Chart of the Day

Delta

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Delta.jpg 285 379 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2014-03-06 08:42:532014-03-06 08:42:53It?s Pedal to the Metal Once Again
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

The American Onshoring Trend is Accelerating

Newsletter

Onshoring, the return of US manufacturing from abroad, is rapidly gathering pace. It is increasingly playing a crucial part in the unfolding American industrial renaissance. It could well develop into the most important new trend on the global economic scene during the early 21st century. It is also paving the way for a return of the roaring twenties to our home shores.

Of course, it is hard to quantify this assumption with hard data. US government statistics are a deep lagging indicator and are unable to keep up with a rapidly changing, interconnected, fluid world. No doubt, they will tell us this epoch making sea change is underway in ten years.

However, is possible to track what a single company is accomplishing. In 1973, General Electric (GE) ran the largest home appliance manufacturing facility in the world. Its Appliance Park in Louisville, Kentucky, employed 23,000 workers packed into six gigantic buildings, each as large as a shopping mall. It was so big, it even earned its own postal zip code (40225).

After that, the offshoring mania kicked in, with the firm motivated by a single factor: hourly wages. You could hire 30 men in China for the cost of one American union worker. The savings were too compelling to pass up, and The Great Hollowing Out of US manufacturing was off to the races.

GE tried to sell the entire operation, but was too late. The 2008 financial crisis decimated the market for Midwest industrial facilities. You could only get the scrap metal value, or three cents on the dollar. By 2011 employment at Appliance Park had plunged to 1,863, and the region?s new ?Rust Belt? sobriquet was well earned.

Then, almost imperceptibly at first, the trend started to reverse. Decades of 20% a year wage increases took the cost of a skilled Chinese worker from $300 a year to $20,000. The 2011 Japanese tsunami, followed by huge floods in Thailand, caused massive disruptions to the international parts supply network. A minor strike by the Longshoreman?s Union at the Port of Oakland in California brought the distribution channel to a grinding halt. Business plans that looked great on an Excel spreadsheet turned out to be not so hot in practice.

It gets worse. When Chinese workers walked across the street to collect bigger pay packages, they often took blue prints, business plans, and proprietary software with them. Six months later, a local competitor would show up with a similar, although inferior, product at half the cost. Suddenly, globalization was not all it was cracked up to be.

In the meantime, the American labor force, reading the Chinese characters on the wall, evolved. Unions were disbanded. Antiquated work rules were tossed. The unions that were left agreed to two tier wage structures that had entry level employees coming in at $13.50 an hour, a fraction of the original rate.

Then management got smarter. By removing the assembly line from the marketplace, companies lost touch with customers. Designers lost contact with the manufacturing process, creating products that could only be built expensively, or not at all. Quality plummeted. Innovation suffered. By bringing manufacturing home, firms not only solved these problems, they were able to build better ones for less money.

China turned out to be farther away than people thought. Having middle management jet lagged up to three months a year proved to be very expensive. It takes six weeks to ship an appliance from the Middle Kingdom to the US if the shipping schedules are perfect.

An American plant can truck product to most US stores within two days. That wasn?t a problem when consumer products saw lives that ran into decades. It is a big deal when rapidly accelerating technological improvements require them to be turned over every three years, as they are today.

The energy picture is undercutting the arithmetic that used to justify offshoring. Oil prices levitating near $100 a barrel are up 400% in 14 years, elevating the cost of production in Asia and shipments to the US. In the US, the fracking boom has let lose a gusher of cheap oil. It has also freed up a few centuries worth of low carbon burning natural gas, giving American manufacturers a further cost advantage.

Better American management techniques are giving US based factories an edge. I saw this up close at the Tesla (TSLA) factory in Fremont, California, where workers have the ability to improve the assembly process daily, and are incented to do so. The place was so clean and quiet, it felt more like a hospital than a factory. By adopting similar techniques, GE, is building the same number of appliances as it did during the 1960?s peak, about 250,000 a year, with one third of the employees.

Using the new thinking, many companies are finding out that offshoring was a big mistake in the first place, and are bringing production home. Some business analysts estimate that up to a quarter of the companies that offshored lost money doing it.

The fact that GE is onshoring is important. It is considered by many to be the best-run industrial company in the United States, and when it leads, many follow. On the heels of the GE move, Whirlpool has relocated its mixer assembly from China to Ohio, and Otis has brought home elevator making from Mexico. Even Wham-O has jumped on board, the maker of Frisbees, and a company that is dear to my heart (I dated the founder?s daughter in high school), moving production from the Middle Kingdom back to Southern California.

If I am right, and onshoring speeds up into the next decade, we may get another opportunity to relive the roaring twenties. By then, a shortage of workers will lead to higher wages, greater consumer spending, and rising standards of living. The price of everything will rocket, including your stocks and homes. GDP growth will surge to 4%-5% a year. Inflation will, at long last, make its long predicted return.

It will be an economy in which Jay Gatsby will feel right at home.

US Mfg Jobs A Trend Reversal?

Job Growth

Leonard DiCaprio The Roaring Twenties Are Headed Our Way

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Leonard-DiCaprio-e1415560921439.jpg 271 400 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2013-05-23 09:24:552013-05-23 09:24:55The American Onshoring Trend is Accelerating
DougD

Where?s the Money?

Diary

That is the question that was asked repeatedly by members of congress to the former senior management of the late MF Global. The response was a few feeble shrugs and I don?t knows. CNBC has been running ridiculous contests like ?Where is John Corzine??, and ?What does John Corzine want for Christmas??

The reporting on this by the media has been exaggerated and wildly inaccurate, most likely because he is a democratic billionaire, and therefore a traitor to his class. Enron?s Ken Lay and Jeffrey Skilling received kinder treatment. This is where all of the speculation of an imminent arrest is summing from. Since General Electric (GE) sold CNBC to Comcast, I noticed that the cable network has been making up more of its own news, and this is a classic example.

I know John Corzine because he tried to hire me for Goldman Sachs 25 years ago, without success. Billionaires at the end of immensely successful careers don?t break the law and tell lies just to make another billion, especially in a heavily regulated and closely watched business such as the securities industry. Those are the actions of a junior ?wanabee? rogue trader. So I?ll give you my take on the situation.

When he says he has no idea where the money is, I?m sure Corzine is telling the truth. If he did, he would be the first CEO in history to be knowledgeable about the firm?s day to day margin position. That is usually the responsibility of a mid-level bean counter who is in constant contact with the exchanges. I also don?t believe that the money was lost in a bad bet in the Eurobond market.

A company like MF Global has thousands of relationships with customers, prime brokers, and banks all over the world. Unfortunately, it fired all the people who maintained these relationships the day after the bankruptcy filing because they knew they couldn?t make the payroll. The people who knew where the money was were all sacked.

To trace the money, the bankruptcy administrators are going to have to use a third party accounting firm to trace the money with a forensic examination that will take months. My understanding is that 40,000 MF customers were divvied up among seven different futures brokers, like RJ Obrien. When cash turns up, it will be returned to the customers.

There was an immediate payout of 60% of customer funds the week of the bankruptcy. Another 12% was paid out this week after $800 million was ?found? at another bank. If you have heard nothing about your account so far, you may simply have to check a few boxes on a five page form to recover 72% of your funds.

Even if it turns out that the money was lost in the market, I still think the customers will be made whole. They are at the absolute top of the seniority chain for claims on nearly $70 billion in assets. Many more creditors are going to have to take 100% haircuts before the customers lose a penny, including stock and bond holders and commercial creditors.

If there is a shortfall, I think the CME will want to maintain its pristine record of a customer never losing money from a counterparty failure. So I think they will come up with a payoff of their own, possibly from a new insurance fund capitalized by a transaction tax.

The bottom line is that MF customers will get their money back, and most of it soon. But it could be years before they get their last penny, and they should be prepared to receive a lot of papers in the mail.

 

I Haven?t Got It

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 DougD https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png DougD2011-12-15 01:00:262011-12-15 01:00:26Where?s the Money?
Page 6 of 6«‹456

tastytrade, Inc. (“tastytrade”) has entered into a Marketing Agreement with Mad Hedge Fund Trader (“Marketing Agent”) whereby tastytrade pays compensation to Marketing Agent to recommend tastytrade’s brokerage services. The existence of this Marketing Agreement should not be deemed as an endorsement or recommendation of Marketing Agent by tastytrade and/or any of its affiliated companies. Neither tastytrade nor any of its affiliated companies is responsible for the privacy practices of Marketing Agent or this website. tastytrade does not warrant the accuracy or content of the products or services offered by Marketing Agent or this website. Marketing Agent is independent and is not an affiliate of tastytrade. 

Legal Disclaimer

There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.

Copyright © 2025. Mad Hedge Fund Trader. All Rights Reserved. support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • FAQ
Scroll to top