Global Market Comments
July 1, 2025
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE NEXT COMMODITY SUPER CYCLE HAS ALREADY STARTED),
(COPX), (GLD), (FCX), (BHP), (RIO), (SIL),
(PPLT), (PALL), (GOLD), (ECH), (EWZ), (IDX)
Tag Archive for: ($GOLD)
Global Market Comments
June 18, 2025
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(FIVE REASONS GOLD IS GOING TO A NEW HIGH),
(GLD), (GOLD), (NEM), (GDX)
Global Market Comments
April 29, 2025
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE NEXT THING FOR THE FED TO BUY IS GOLD)
(GLD), (GOLD), (GDX), (NEM)
A huge new buyer may eventually enter the gold market.
That could be a year off, maybe two, or three at the most.
I’ll give you a hint who: your taxes will pay for it.
If true, it could send the price of the barbarous relic soaring above $5,000, or even $50,000 an ounce, a target long led by the tin hat Armageddon crowd.
When I spoke to a senior official at the Federal Reserve the other day, I couldn’t believe what I was hearing.
If the American economy moves into the next recession with rising inflation, a near certainty, its hands will be tied. It dare not cut rates for fear of further fanning the flames.
At that point, our central bank’s primary tool for stimulating US businesses will become utterly useless, ineffective, and impotent.
What else is in the tool bag?
How about large-scale purchases of Gold (GLD)?
You are probably as shocked as I am by this possibility. But there is a rock-solid logic to the plan. As solid as the vault at Fort Knox.
The idea is to create asset price inflation that will spread to the rest of the economy. It already did this with great success from 2009-2014 with quantitative easing, whereby almost every class of debt securities was hoovered up by the government.
“QE on steroids” would involve large-scale purchases of not only gold, but stocks, government bonds, and exchange-traded funds as well.
If you think I’ve been smoking California’s largest cash export (it’s not almonds), you would be in error. I should point out that the Japanese government is already pursuing QE to this extent, at least in terms of equity-type investments.
And, as the history buff that I am, I can tell you that it has been done in the US as well, with tremendous results.
If you thought that President Obama had it rough when he came into office in 2009, it was nothing compared to what Franklin Delano Roosevelt inherited.
The country was in its fourth year of the Great Depression. US GDP had cratered by 43%, consumer prices had crashed by 24%, the unemployment rate was 25%, and stock prices had vaporized by 90%.
Mass starvation loomed.
Drastic measures were called for.
FDR issued Executive Order 6102 banning private ownership of gold, ordering citizens to sell their holdings to the US Treasury at a lowly $20.67 an ounce.
He then urged Congress to pass the Gold Reserve Act of 1934, which instantly revalued the government’s holdings at $35.00, an increase of 69.32%. These and other measures caused the value of America’s gold holdings to leap from $4 to $12 billion.
Since the US was still on the gold standard back then, this triggered an instant dollar devaluation of more than 50%. The high gold price sucked in massive amounts of the yellow metal from abroad creating, you guessed it, inflation.
The government then borrowed massively against this artificially created wealth to fund the landscape-altering infrastructure projects of the New Deal.
It worked.
During the following three years, the GDP skyrocketed by 48%, inflation eked out a 2% gain, the unemployment rate dropped to 18%, and stocks jumped by 80%. Happy days were here again.
However, in the 21st-century version of such a gold policy, it is highly unlikely that we would see another gold ownership ban.
Instead, the Fed would most likely move into the physical gold market, sitting on the bid for years, much like it did in the 2010s Treasury bond market for five years. Gold prices would increase by a multiple of current levels.
It would then borrow against its new gold holdings, plus the 4,176 metric tonnes worth $40 billion at today’s market prices already sitting in Fort Knox, to fund a multibillion-dollar tax cut.
Yes, this all sounds like a fantasy. But negative interest rates were considered an impossibility only a few years ago.
The Fed’s move on gold would be only one aspect of a multi-faceted package of desperate last-ditch measures to resuscitate the economy at some point in the future. The time to start buying gold is RIGHT NOW!
Persistent urban legends and Internet rumors claim that the vault is actually empty or filled with fake steel bars painted gold.
That is, until Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin visited the vault on his way to view the solar eclipse at government expense in August 2017.
He says the gold is still there. But only if you believe Steve Mnuchin. A lot don’t.
We’ll never know for sure. Visitors are not allowed.
The Next Economic Stimulus Program?
Global Market Comments
April 17, 2025
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE MAD HEDGE TRADERS & INVESTORS SUMMIT REPLAYS ARE UP)
(APRIL 16 BIWEEKLY STRATEGY WEBINAR Q&A),
(SPY), (SH), (SDS), (TLT), (MSTR), (GLD),
(GOLD), (SLV), (AGQ), (NEM)
Below, please find subscribers’ Q&A for the April 16 Mad Hedge Fund Trader Global Strategy Webinar, broadcast from Incline Village, NV.
Q: Is it time to get out of the (SH), which is the short S&P 500 LEAPS?
A: I would say no. We're still very deep in the money for the LEAPS I put out two months ago. I doubt we're going to new highs by August when that LEAPS expires, so I would hang on to it, especially if you have other longs on the stock market. But if you're nervous, you probably have at least a 50% profit in that anyway, so take the money and run.
Q: Could the S&P 500 trade down to 4,500?
A: Absolutely, yes. China is kind of in a good position. They can wait. They can wait a very long time until they get what they want. We can't. Trump needs China to fold immediately, or the trade with China will cause a never-ending recession in the US. Remember, we have elections here—in China, they don't. That puts them in a very strong negotiating position. That's why you're seeing basically all economic data roll over and point to a recession. Even if some settlement is negotiated, there still will be some tariffs left. They just won't be at 145%. You know, it’s not a great investment environment to bet your retirement savings on, and certainly not an environment to engage in very rapid short-term trading unless you have 50 years of experience like I do. That's why I'm up this month, and the rest of the world is getting absolutely crushed.
Q: Are you going to send more LEAPS?
A: LEAPS are something we do at market bottoms, not tops, because we have such enormous leverage in the LEAPS trade—they’re usually 10 - 1 to 100 - 1 leverage. At some point, there'll be a lot of fantastic LEAPS in technology stocks, but I don't think we've hit bottom yet. In fact, at best, they've mounted weak bounces over the last few days. So, the charts still look terrible—not a good time for LEAPS.
Q: When do you see the bottom?
A: I have no idea, nobody has any idea. It's like economic policy is changing hour by the hour. Best thing to do is nothing in that situation—and that's what most of the economy is doing. That's why the economy is shutting down. Nobody knows what the final picture will look like—the uncertainty is the greatest since the uncertainty of the pandemic, or 9/11 before that.
Q: Should I hide in a money market fund?
A: No, with the money market fund, you run credit risk with the issuer of that fund. With 90-day US Treasury bills, there's no risk, so you have a government guarantee to get all your money back on the maturity date. If your custodian goes bankrupt, you can always get the T-bills back. It may take you three years in custodian bankruptcy proceedings to get your money market fund back. That’s what we saw with MF Global in 2011.
Q: What is the end game of the China-US trade dispute? How does it affect the stock market?
A: Well, we can't see an end game. Basically, you have two counterparties who are stubborn as heck, and we could be stuck in no man's land for a very long time. You'd have to think eventually a settlement of some type comes. Is that worth a recession for the U.S? For most people, I doubt it. And what if China just wants to wait out Trump and wait for the tariffs to go away in four years? That is a possible outcome. Stock markets always discount the worst-case scenario first before they discount anything else. I think that's what we saw last week, when we broke 5,000 in the S&P 500.
Q: Are you optimistic about bank stocks now?
A: No. They will lead the downturn along with technology stocks. But when this all ends, they will also lead the upturn, and that's why you're seeing bank stocks have such hard bounces off their bottom. It's another one of two sectors that people will be first to rush into—banks and technology stocks. And while tech is expensive, banks are cheap.
Q: How can interest rates fall when government policies, interest rate policies, are causing them to spike?
A: Well, it's very simple: when foreign investors lose faith in the U.S. Government, they have, they pull their money out. They don't need to be here. It's a situation of, “Well, if you don't need us, we don't need you.” And foreigners own about 25% of all of the $36 trillion in national debt out there, or about $9 trillion. And in stocks they own here and the number goes up to $12 trillion. It doesn't take much selling to cause a panic in the bond market. That is what we have been seeing. Whether that continues, I have no idea—it depends on the next tweet coming out of Washington.
Q: What about Bank of America (BAC)?
A: Yeah, it will also bounce the hardest off the bottom—great buy, and these things are all cheap relative to technology stocks. You know, banks still have PE multiples in the low teens. Tech stocks are all the way down to the low 20s from the 30s and 40s, so they're roughly trading at double the multiples of bank stocks. That's one reason people are rushing back into these.
Q: What's the basis of your prediction on a falling US dollar?
A: Again, it's foreign selling. I don't think I've ever seen a falling dollar and rising interest rates in 60 years of watching. It goes against all economic fundamentals in the currency markets. But when there's a panic, there's a panic. People want out of everything at any price, and that's what's happening now. As long as foreigners are dumping our assets, the dollar will keep going down—dumping our assets means dollar selling after 80 years of dollar buying.
Q: Is gold the only safe haven?
A: Yes. We'll get into this in the gold section, but even gold went down for three days, and then wiser heads prevailed and it actually triggered a panic melt-up in gold assets. The miners were up 25% in days. That is another great weak-dollar play.
Q: How do you protect the US from a dollar fall?
A: Change our economic policies; end the trade war.
Q: Is it a good time to buy a house?
A: No, it is not, unless you can wait out the current downturn. High interest rate mortgage rates shot up from 6.5% to 7.1% in a week, and that basically kills off the housing market for the foreseeable future. And of course, when people are worried about their futures, their savings, and their assets, the last thing they do is go out and buy a house.
Q: Is there enough negative sentiment around now for us to go back into the bond market?
A: No. There is no precedent for the type of market action that's going on now. Will the U.S. government suddenly become reasonable? I doubt it. You can expect tweet bombs to happen at any time. So, people are just hoarding cash and avoiding risk at all costs. It used to be that bonds were the safe place to go. No longer. Not with 10% moves down in a week like we saw last week. Sorry—T-Bills are the only actual safe play out there, and their yield is the same as Treasury bonds without the risk.
Q: Will crypto keep going down?
A: If we continue with a risk-off market, I think you can expect crypto to keep falling. Crypto fell 30% from its top—at least Bitcoin did. It's basically matching the downside with tech stocks one for one, so no protection in crypto, no diversification. The protection aspect that was promised by crypto promoters lever shows. No flight to safety is happening there whatsoever. And that's why I'm looking to add to my short in MicroStrategy Inc. (MSTR)—they're a leveraged long Bitcoin play.
Q: Is the U.S. economy set for a hard landing?
A: I think absolutely, yes, the hard landing is in progress. That's what all of the economic data says. It's hard to find any positive news coming out of the economy—people are running for their lives, essentially.
Q: Do you expect inflation to return and take stocks lower?
A: Absolutely, yes. The highest tariffs in history start hitting retail prices in the next month or two, and the price increases should be dramatic, especially on anything from China. So yeah, we should see that come out in the data in the next few months.
Q: Do you expect silver to follow gold?
A: Yes, I do, but it hasn't been performing as well because there is a recession drag on silver, which you don't have for gold. Silver (SLV), (AGQ) are used in a lot of electronics and solar panels.
Q: When do you get back into gold (GLD)?
A: Whenever we get a dip. So far, any dips have been very brief and short-term. It's kind of reminiscent of the 1970s when gold moved from $32 an ounce to $900. That’s when you found me in a line in Johannesburg, South Africa, waiting to sell all my Krugerrands.
Q: Which countries will benefit from manufacturing moving out of China?
A: The answer is really no countries. As soon as manufacturing moves from China to another one like Vietnam, the US then puts punitive tariffs on that second country. So, there's no place to hide. It's really a war against the world. That's the message that the administration is putting out: if you don't want to build a factory here, we don't want to do business with you. We don't want your products. And most companies will do nothing. They'll wait this out, wait for a future president to eliminate all tariffs. Until then, international trade grinds to a halt. No trade makes sense at 145% tariff. Just to give you some idea on how much that is, if you buy a top end MacBook Pro for $8,000, and you pay the full 145% tariff, that is an $11,600 tariff if you have to pay it, which brings the total cost of a MacBook Pro to nearly $19,600. How many are you going to buy at that price?
Q: Do you think the Fed will cut interest rates?
A: No, we haven't seen the inflation data yet. They are backward-looking, and only after we see a sharp rise in prices will they raise rates. Chances of them cutting now are zero with all the risks in inflation to the upside right now and unemployment still under control. So, no interest rate cuts this year.
To watch a replay of this webinar with all the charts, bells, whistles, and classic rock music, just log in to www.madhedgefundtrader.com, go to MY ACCOUNT, click on GLOBAL TRADING DISPATCH, then WEBINARS, and all the webinars from the last 12 years are there in all their glory.
Good Luck and Good Trading
John Thomas
CEO & Publisher
The Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader
Global Market Comments
March 25, 2025
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE ULTRA BULL CASE FOR GOLD)
(GLD), (UGL), (GOLD), (NEM)
I am constantly barraged with emails from gold bugs who passionately argue that their beloved metal is trading at a tiny fraction of its true value and that the barbaric relic is really worth $5,000, $10,000, or even $50,000 an ounce (GLD).
They claim the move in the yellow metal we are seeing is only the beginning of a 30-fold rise in prices similar to what we saw from 1972 to 1979, when it leaped from $33 to $950.
To match the 1936 peak value, when the monetary base was collapsing, and the double top in 1979 when gold futures first tickled $950, the precious metal has to increase in value by eight times, or to $9,600 an ounce.
I am long-term bullish on gold, other precious metals, and virtually all commodities for that matter. But I am not that bullish. It makes my own one-year $5,000 prediction positively wimp-like by comparison.
The seven-year spike up in prices we saw in 1979, which found me in a very long line in Johannesburg, South Africa to unload my own Krugerrands, was triggered by a number of one-off events that will never be repeated.
Some 40 years’ worth of demand was unleashed all at once when Richard Nixon took the US off the gold standard and decriminalized private ownership in 1972. Inflation later peaked at around 20%.
Newly enriched sellers of oil had a strong historical affinity with gold. South Africa, the world's largest gold producer, was then a boycotted international pariah and teetering on the edge of disaster, threatening gold supplies. We are nowhere near the same geopolitical neighborhood today, and hence my more subdued forecast.
But then again, I could be wrong.
If you took all the gold in the world and melted it into a cube, it would only have 63 feet on a side. That includes all the yellow metal accumulated by the ancient Pharos of Egypt, mined by the Spanish in Latin America, and discovered by 49ers during the California gold rush. I‘m not counting all the gold sitting at the bottom of the ocean, sunk by storms and privateers.
Suffice it to say, there isn’t much of element 79 on the periodic chart (AU) around. Its value is in its scarcity.
The geopolitical outlook has also changed in favor of gold. China, Russia, and Iran have become large-scale accumulators to bypass international sanctions. Gold is also a depleting asset. Barrick Gold (GOLD) isn’t opening new mines at 15,000 feet in the Andes Mountains because they like the clear air.
The cost of gold mining equipment is also rising at four times the inflation rate. You know those tires on those huge Caterpillar 797 trucks? They cost $200,000 each, and there is a one-year waiting list.
All this makes the barbarous relic a strong “BUY” for me.
Do You Have any Retreads?
After seven years in the penalty box, gold is finally starting to come alive, and the Armageddon crowd is absolutely loving it. Maybe after ten years of rising, stocks are finally expensive on a relative basis?
These are the guys who are perennially predicting the collapse of the dollar, the default of the US government, hyperinflation, and the end of the world.
Better to keep all your assets in gold and silver, store at least a year’s worth of canned food, and keep your untraceable guns well-oiled and supplied with ammo, preferably in high-capacity magazines.
If you followed their advice, you lost your shirt.
I have broken many of these wayward acolytes of their money-losing habits. But not all of them. There seems to be an endless supply emanating from the hinterlands.
The “Oracle of Omaha” Warren Buffet often goes to great lengths to explain why he despises the yellow metal.
The sage doesn't really care about the gold, whatever the price. He sees it primarily as a bet on fear. I imagine he feels the same about Bitcoin, the modern tulips of our age.
If investors are more afraid in a year than they are today, then you make money on gold. If they aren't, then you lose money.
The only problem now is that fear ain’t working.
If you took all the gold in the world, it would form a cube 67 feet on a side, worth $5 trillion. For that same amount of money, you could own other assets with far greater productive earning power, including:
*All the farmland in the US, about 1 billion acres, which is worth $2.5 trillion.
*Seven Apple’s (AAPL), the second largest capitalized company in the world at $731 billion.
Instead of producing any income or dividends, gold just sits there and shines, making you feel like King Midas.
I don't know. With the stock market at an all-time high and oil trading at $75/barrel, a bet on fear looks pretty good to me right now.
I'm still sticking with my long-term forecast of the old inflation-adjusted high of $2,300/ounce.
It is just a matter of time before emerging market central bank buying pushes it up there. And who knows? Fear might make a comeback too.
Global Market Comments
December 24, 2024
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE NEXT COMMODITY SUPER CYCLE HAS ALREADY STARTED),
(COPX), (GLD), (FCX), (BHP), (RIO), (SIL),
(PPLT), (PALL), (GOLD), (ECH), (EWZ), (IDX)
