• support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Member Login
Mad Hedge Fund Trader
  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Luncheons
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Tag Archive for: (NFLX)

Mad Hedge Fund Trader

November 12, 2021

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
November 12, 2021
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(PEAK STREAMING GROWTH ISN’T THE END OF STREAMING)
(DIS), (NFLX), (AMZN)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2021-11-12 14:04:532021-11-15 09:44:43November 12, 2021
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

Peak Streaming Growth Isn't the End of Streaming

Tech Letter

Peak streaming — that’s what the indicators are telling us.

It’s been a good run — lots of money made so far.

The streaming industry is resting after the pandemic pulled revenue forward a few years.

It won’t be as easy now, as the maturity of the industry means that it becomes a war inside the war, instead of the tide-lifts-all-boats type of growth.

The latter is what everyone hopes, but doesn’t always get.

The world’s largest entertainment company, Disney, posted a significant slowdown in subscriber sign-ups at its flagship streaming service in the most recent quarter.

Disney+ added only two million subscribers last quarter bringing its total to 118.1 million.

Analysts had expected this quarter’s total to come to 125.3 million. During the previous quarter, Disney+ had added more than 12 million new subscribers.

First, the follow-through from consumers just wanting to experience outside and the services attached to them ring true.

The price hikes are also another net negative, as it makes consumers less enthused about signing up.

This had to be expected and many of these streaming companies would honestly admit that they couldn’t continue the pandemic era performance.

A reversion to the mean is not the end of streaming and Disney’s streaming services.

It is still on track to reach previous guidance of between 230 million and 260 million paid Disney+ subscribers globally by the end of fiscal 2024.

Dig deeper into the streaming data and it shows that customers in India didn’t sign up because of a delay of Indian Premier League cricket games that were to air on the service.

Another indicator of the pivot to outside business is the Disney theme park revenue climbing 99%.

The trend towards outdoor activities means a slew of cancellations of the monthly subscriptions.

Netflix was the rare streaming company that bucked the trend.

Netflix streaming service added 4.4 million subscribers—or about a million more than it had forecast—on the strength of new popular shows like “Squid Game.”

Moving forward, the bar rises quite a bit for the quality of content.

Viewers are demanding more or they are riding Space Mountain in Anaheim.

Streaming companies won’t be able to pedal out mediocre shows and movies, and secondly, there is no patience for customers as the number of streaming options has multiplied.

The deeper underbelly shows us that the general trend of linear TV cancellations and streaming signups appears to be continuing even if the rate of signups is slowing.

Disney, WarnerMedia, and AMC Networks all reaffirmed previous full-year and future year forecasts. And while pandemic gains may have slowed, production slowdowns and shutdowns have also ended, which will lead to a surge of new content for all of the streaming services.

Disney investors will be zeroed in to see if the company can pump out some blockbusters, but a glut of content might mean not enough eyeballs to digest these blockbusters.

Coronavirus-related production delays continue to disrupt its pipeline of content delivery.

Disney subscriber growth could ramp back up in the latter half of 2022 when they have better titles coming to market.

Another issue for Disney is if they are willing to produce more adult content and veer away from the younger cohort they are used to entertaining.

I don’t mean X rated, but the 25-44 aged bunch, everyone is sick of the superhero movies.

When it comes to attracting subscribers to Disney+, the company in November and December will be relying on a Beatles documentary, “The Beatles: Get Back,” additional Marvel Studios and Lucasfilm Ltd. shows and films that include a new “Home Alone” feature.

In April, Jeff Bezos said more than 175 million Amazon Prime members had streamed shows and movies in the past year.

Beyond the big three — Netflix, Disney+, and Amazon Prime — things get cloudier.  

In July, NBCUniversal’s Peacock reported 54 million net new subscribers and more than 20 million monthly active accounts.

Other players with potentially strong platforms include WarnerMedia’s HBO Max, with a reported 69.4 million global subscribers, and Apple TV+, which is rumored to have about 20 million U.S. subscribers.

The major streaming competitors are also actively expanding their footprint abroad to acquire more growth, but the issue I have there is that the average revenue per user (ARPU) is nothing close to what it is in North America.

Although oversees revenue could provide a little bump to earnings, it won’t recreate their earnings composition.

Which leads me to a broader take on tech, it’s slowing down because we have been in the same cycle which was essentially initiated by the smartphone, the cloud, 3G super apps, and high-speed internet.

Those super levers are showing exhaustion.

It’s not a coincidence that Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg was desperately trotting out his vision for the Metaverse and Apple removing personal data tracking from its ecosystem.

These are late cycle signs that shouldn’t be missed.

Big tech has become a great deal more mercantilist during the latter half of this bull market, yet we aren’t at the point of cannibalization, but I do envision that moment 5-7 years out from now.

Until then, high quality tech will grind higher while slowly raising their monthly prices, and the low-quality tech products will fall by the wayside because they lack the killer content.

disney

 

 

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2021-11-12 14:02:262021-11-19 21:14:03Peak Streaming Growth Isn't the End of Streaming
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

October 20, 2021

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
October 20, 2021
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(NETFLIX STILL ADDING VIEWERS)
(NFLX)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2021-10-20 15:04:522021-10-20 16:23:37October 20, 2021
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

Netflix Still Adding Viewers

Tech Letter

Netflix (NFLX) is reaching close to 1 billion TV fans globally with their content, and that can obviously generate a lot of virility for great pieces of content.

That being said, the content has to deliver. Yet that’s what Netflix has essentially done from the beginning, repeatedly offering world-class content that is consumed in nanoseconds.

If you think about the big picture, NFLX is at 213 million subscribers and that doesn’t make a dent compared to pay-TV households, ex-China.

But NFLX certainly believes they can match pay-TV households, and that aspiration signals plenty of room for growth.

Streaming is developing at a breathtaking pace, all kinds of devices and competitors helping that market grow, and it’s not just NFLX even though many of us live in a NFLX-centric world.

Then when I think about what’s out there in terms of competition — competition of content because NFLX doesn’t live in a vacuum.

Allowing to scale with this robust network and offering titles like Squid Game a chance to go viral really just signals overperformance for the NFLX business as a whole.

The most incredible part is the system that NFLX built from scratch that has turned into a highly distributed business model when it was NFLX’s Korean team two years ago that commissioned the hit show.  

Just the synergy in that is great for NFLX, while really driving a narrative of a strong international audience that is digesting the Netflix content engine.

To that, I must give NFLX management credit for pushing hard into the content creation business and they have really made miracles happen up against the pandemic and all, but now with the team wrestling with the post-COVID, how do things move forward?

It all comes back to if NFLX can be that first choice in entertainment, then ultimately, that's what's driving that secular growth from linear to streaming entertainment and specifically NFLX’s platform.

The NFLX team recognized something that nobody else did and created an environment for that creator to make a great show.

They pretty much found the best content creators, handed them boatloads of cash, and said go make something kickass and they did.

Hollywood has been notorious for not only selling out but for micromanaging content creators and suffocating the creation process.

Clearly, when creative artists are not given the freedom to create, it negatively impacts the end-product, and that’s a pivotal reason linear television and Hollywood are now chasing NFLX.

NFLX is now the King of content going viral and going viral is really hard to predict, but it's super powerful when it happens, and they deliver the goods to be able to deliver that much viewing when viewers storm NFLX’s platform to consumer adjacent content that turns into binge-watching.

And you have people talk about it in ravenous terms that you can spoof it on Saturday Night Live because it's so in the zeitgeist.

Few companies in the world can accomplish that.

Now it’s not only Korea’s Squid Game, but NFLX is churning out the viral hits like with La Casa de Papel from Spain, with Lupin from France, with the film Blood Red Sky from Germany, from Sex Education in the U.K., where the stories of the world can increasingly come from anywhere in the world.

NFLX has systemized a way to build great hits.

Non-English content viewing has grown three times since NFLX started in 2008 making content.

Installing new storytellers into the world from everywhere in the world is supercharging the business model and that’s why we are experiencing a massive melt-up in NFLX shares.

 

 

netflix

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/netflix.png 524 954 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2021-10-20 15:02:492021-10-28 01:45:49Netflix Still Adding Viewers
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

August 27, 2021

Diary, Newsletter, Summary

Global Market Comments
August 27, 2021
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(AUGUST 25 BIWEEKLY STRATEGY WEBINAR Q&A),
(ROM), (EEM), (FXI), (DIS), (AMZN), (NFLX), (CHPT), (TLT), (TBT), (AAPL),
(GOOG), (WPM), (GOLD), (NEM), (GDX), (X), (SLV), (FCX), (BA), (HOOD), (USO)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2021-08-27 10:04:102021-08-27 11:02:57August 27, 2021
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

August 25 Biweekly Strategy Webinar Q&A

Diary, Newsletter, Research

Below please find subscribers’ Q&A for the August 25 Mad Hedge Fund Trader Global Strategy Webinar broadcast from The Atlantis Casino Hotel in Reno, NV.

Q: How does a 2X ProShares Ultra Technology ETF (ROM) February 2022 vertical bull call spread on the ROM look? Would you do $110-$115 or $115-$120?

A: I would do nothing here at $112.50 because we’ve just gone up 10 points in a week. I’d wait for some kind of pullback, even just $5 or $10 points, and then I would do the $110-$115. I’m leaning towards more conservative LEAPS these days—bets that the market goes sideways to up small rather than going ballistic, which it has done for the last 18 months. Think at-the-money strikes, not deep out-of-the-money on your LEAPS from here on for the rest of this economic cycle. The potential profits are still enormous. The only problem with (ROM) is that the longest maturities on the options are only six months.

Q: How do you recommend entering your long-term portfolio?

A: I would use the one-third rule: you put on ⅓ now, ⅓ higher or lower later on, and ⅓ higher or lower again. That way you get a good average price. Long term, everything goes up until we hit the next recession, which is probably several years off.

Q: I keep reading that the Delta variant is a market risk, but I don’t think that investors will look through this. Is Delta already priced into the shares?

A: Yes, what is not priced into the shares is the end of Delta, the end of the pandemic—and that will lead to my “everything” rally that I’ve been talking about for a month now. And we have already seen the beginning of that, especially with the price action this week. So yes, Delta in: dead market; Delta out: roaring market.

Q: Do you think there will eventually be a rotation into emerging markets (EEM), or has the virus battered these markets too much to even consider it?

A: Sometime in our future—not yet—the emerging markets will be our core holding. And the trigger for that will be the collapse of the dollar, which is hitting an interim high right now. When the greenback rolls over and dies, you can expect emerging markets, especially China, to take off like a rocket. That’s going to be our next big trade. I don't know if it will be this year or next year but it’s coming, so start doing your emerging market research now, and keep reading my newsletter.

Q: Is the coming tax hike a problem for the stock market?

A: No, I don’t think so. First off, I don’t think they’re going to do a tax bill this year; they don’t want anything to interfere with the 2022 election, so it may be next year’s business. Also, any new taxes are going to be overwhelmingly focused on billionaires, carried interest, offshoring, and large corporations. The middle class, people who make less than $400,000 a year, will not see any tax hike at all, possibly even getting some tax cuts via restored SALT deductions. So, I don't really see it affecting the stock market at all.

Q: What do you think about Chinese stocks (FXI)?

A: Long-term they’re okay, short term possibly more downside. Interestingly, the bigger risk may not be China itself and how the government is beating up its own tech companies, but the SEC. It has indicated they don’t really like these offshore vehicles that have been listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and they may move to ban them. I’m not rushing into China right now, only because there are just so many better opportunities in the US stock market for the time being. I may go back in the future—it’s a case where I’d rather buy them on the way up than trying to catch a falling knife on China right now.

Q: Do you expect any market impact from the Jackson Hole meeting?

A: Yes, whatever J Powell says, even if he says nothing, will have a market impact. And it will have a bigger impact on the bond market than it will on the stock market, which is down a full point this morning. So yes, but not yet. I imagine we’ll hear something very soon.

Q: September and October tend to be volatile; do you see us having a 5% or 10% pullback in those months?

A: I don’t see any more than 5%, with the hyper liquidity that we have in the system now. There just aren’t any events out there that could trigger a pullback of 10%—no geopolitical events, and the economy will be getting stronger, not worse. So yes, an “everything rally” doesn’t give you many long side entry points, so I just don’t see 10% happening.

Q: What about a Walt Disney (DIS) January 2022 $180-$220 LEAPS?

A: I would do the $180-$200. I think you can afford to be tighter on your spread there, take some more risk because I think it’s just going to go nuts to the upside once we get a drop in COVID cases. By the way, Disney parks are only operating at 70% capacity, so if you go back up to 100% that's a near 50% increase in profits for the company. And it’s not just Disney, but Netflix (NFLX), Amazon (AMZN), and everybody else that’s about to have the greatest number of blockbuster movies released of all time. They’re holding back their big-ticket movies for the end of the pandemic when people can go back into theaters. We’ll start seeing those movies come out in the last quarter of this year, and I’m particularly looking forward to the next James Bond movie, a man after my own heart.

Q: Are EV car charging companies like ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) going to do as well as the car companies?

A: No. They’re low margin business, so it’s not a business model for me. I like high-profit margins, huge barriers to entry, and very wide moats, which pretty much characterizes everything I own. The big profits in EVs are going to be in the cars themselves. Charging the cars is a very capital-intensive, highly regulated, and low-margin business.

Q: Would a Fed taper cause a 10% pullback?

A: Absolutely not; in fact, I think a taper would make the market go up because Jay Powell has been talking it into the market all year. And that’s his goal, is to minimize the impact of a taper so when they finally do it, they say ho-hum and “okay you can take that risk out of the market.” That’s the way these things work.

Q: What is your yearend target for United States Treasury Bond Fund (TLT)?

A: $132. Call it bold, but I'm all about bold. I think the first stop will be at $144, then $138, then bombs away!

Q: What will it take for (TLT) to dip below $130?

A: Another year of hot economic growth, which Congress seems hell-bent on delivering us.

Q: What are your ProShares Ultra Short 20+ Year Treasury ETF (TBT) targets?

A: When we were at 1.76% on the 10-year bond, the (TBT) made it all the way back to 22 ½. Next year we go higher, probably to $25, maybe even $30.

Q: What’s your 10-year view on the (TBT)?

A: $200. That’s when you get interest rates back to 10% in 10 years on the 10-year bond. So yes, that’s a great long-term play.

Q: How long can we hold (TBT)?

A: As long as you want. Ten years would be a good time frame if you want to catch that $17 to $200 move. The (TBT) is an ETF, not an option, therefore it doesn’t expire.

Q: Are you working on an electrification stock list?

A: I am not, because it’s such a fragmented sector. It’s tough to really nail down specific stocks. I think it’s safe to say that the electric power grid is going to change beyond all recognition, but they won’t necessarily be in high margin companies, and I tend to prefer high-profit-margin, large-moat companies which nobody else can get into, like Apple (AAPL) or Google (GOOG).

Q: What about gas pipelines with high yields?

A: They have a high yield for a reason; because they’re very high risk. If you're going to a carbon-free economy, you don’t necessarily want to own pipelines whose main job is moving carbon; it’s another buggy whip-type industry I would avoid. I’ve seen people get wiped out by these things more times than I could count. If you remember Master Limited Partnerships, quite a few of them went bankrupt last year with the oil crash, so I would avoid that area. These tend to be very highly leveraged and poorly managed instruments.

Q: Best play on silver (SLV)?

A: Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) is the highest leveraged silver play out there, and a great LEAPS candidate. Go out 2 years and triple your money.

Q: Geopolitical oil (USO) risks?

A: No, nobody cares about oil anymore—that’s why we’re giving up on Afghanistan. China is buying 80% of the Persian Gulf oil right now. We don’t really need it at all, so why have our military over there to protect China’s oil supply?

Q: What about Freeport McMoRan (FCX)?

A: I absolutely love it. Any big economic recovery can’t happen without copper, and you have a huge tailwind there from electric cars which need 200 pounds of copper each, as opposed to 20 pounds in conventional cars.

Q: I see AMC Entertainment Holdings (AMC) is up 20% today; should everyone be chasing this stock?

A: No, absolutely not. (AMC) and all the meme stocks aren’t investments, they’re gambling, and there are better ways to gamble.

Q: Should I buy the lumber dip?

A: Yes. I think the slowdown on housing is temporary because it will take 10 years for supply and demand in the housing market to come back into balance because of all the millennials entering the housing market for the first time. So, that would be a yes on lumber and all the other commodities out there that go into housing like copper, steel, and aluminum.

Q: Should I put money into Canadian Junior Gold Miners (GDX)?

A: No, I would rather go out and take a long nap first. These are just so high risk, and they often go bankrupt. The liquidity is terrible, and the dealing spreads are wide. I would stick with the bigger precious metal plays like Newmont Mining (NEM), Barrick Gold (GOLD), and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM).

Q: Is Boeing (BA) a buy here?

A: Yes, we’re back at the bottom end of the trading range for the stock. It’s just a matter of time before they get things right, and the 737 Max orders are rolling in like crazy now that there’s an airplane shortage.

Q: What do you think about Robinhood (HOOD)?

A: I like it quite a lot; I got flushed out of my long position on Friday with a 10% down move. Of course, 90% of my stop losses end up expiring at their maximum profit points, but I have to do it to keep the volatility of the portfolio down. So yes, I’ll try to buy it again on the next dip. The trouble is it’s kind of a quasi-meme stock in its own right, hence the volatility; so I would say on the next 10% down day, you go into Robinhood, and I probably will too.

Q: How are the wildfires around Tahoe?

A: They’re terrible and there are three of them. I did a hike two days ago there, and out of a parking lot with 100 spaces, I was the only one there. It’s the only time I’d ever seen Tahoe deserted in August. With visibility of 500 yards, it's just terrible. Fortunately, I was able to hike without coughing my guts out—it’s not so thick that you can’t breathe.

Q: What do you think of US Steel (X)?

A: I like it, I think the whole industrial commodity complex rallies like crazy going into the end of the year.

Q: As a new member, where is the best place to start? It’s just kind of like drinking from a fire hose.

A: Wait for the trade alerts; they only happen at sweet spots and you may have to wait a few days or weeks to get one since we only like to enter them at good points. That’s the best place to enter new positions for the first time. In the meantime, keep reading all the research, because when these trade alerts do come out, they’re not surprises because I’m pumping out research on them every day, across multiple fronts. Be patient— we are running a 93% success rate, but only because we take our time on entering good trades. The services that guarantee a trade alert every day lose money hand over fist.

Q: If they do delist Chinese stocks, will US investors be left holding the bag?

A: Yes, and that will be the only reason they don’t delist them, that they don’t want to wipe out all current US investors.

To watch a replay of this webinar with all the charts, bells, whistles, and classic rock music, just log in to www.madhedgefundtrader.com, go to MY ACCOUNT, click on GLOBAL TRADING DISPATCH or TECHNOLOGY LETTER (whichever applies to you), then select WEBINARS  and all the webinars from the last ten years are there in all their glory.

Good Luck and Stay Healthy.

John Thomas
CEO & Publisher
The Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader

 

 

 

 

 

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/john-thomas-wine-1.png 812 562 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2021-08-27 10:02:412021-08-27 11:03:48August 25 Biweekly Strategy Webinar Q&A
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

July 28, 2021

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
July 28, 2021
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(THE REAL RULES OF TECH)
(MSFT), (FB), (GOOGL), (AAPL), (AMZN), (NFLX), (TSLA)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2021-07-28 15:04:172021-07-28 16:37:09July 28, 2021
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

The Real Rules of Tech

Tech Letter

Northern Californian tech companies stopped innovating because of the monopolistic nature of current business models that nestle nicely in unfettered capitalism.

They only go by one principle these days – to crush anything remotely resembling competition and they are damn good at doing it.

This has been going on in Silicon Valley for years and the government has turned a blind eye since the beginning of it.

The end result is the absence of competition.

At a higher tech level, the strong get stronger by stockpiling cash and resources, all while taking advantage of historically low rates to finance their growth models.

Why does the U.S. government largely sit on the sidelines and act if nothing has really happened?

If I deploy the concept of Occam's razor to this situation, a philosophical rule that entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily which is interpreted as requiring that the simplest of competing theories be preferred, my bet is that most of U.S. Congress own stock portfolios, even if they are the index variety, and these portfolios are spearheaded by the likes of Apple (AAPL), Facebook (FB), Amazon (AMZN), Google (GOOGL), Microsoft (MSFT), Netflix (NFLX), and of course Tesla (TSLA).

This has come into the open frequently with members of Congress even front-running the March 2020 sell-off with their own portfolios like U.S. senator Kelly Loeffler from Georgia selling $20 million in stock after attending special intelligence briefings in the weeks building up to the coronavirus pandemic.

We definitely don’t get invites to those special intelligence briefings, but Loeffler getting off scot-free by mainly just playing down what she did proves the immunity that politicians accrue from their lofty positions.

It’s a direct conflict of interest, but that's not surprising for politics in 2021 and I would say it epitomizes the era we are in. 

It’s also why Congress hasn’t acted on Silicon Valley’s excessive abuse of power, which is so glaringly blatant that excuses must be crafted just to make it seem they aren’t as bad as they are.

The government likes to jawbone to the public saying they will make competition a level playing field, but actions show they are doing the opposite.

Ultimately, Silicon Valley whispers in the ear of Congress and they listen.

Well, what now?

Tech has now turned mostly into a digital marketing lovefest harnessed around the smartphone and tablet with cheap shortcuts which is partly why the efficacy of the internet has dropped greatly.

The advent of 5G has also been a bust because these titans don’t feel the need to reinvest to make that killer 5G app when they don’t need to.

The truth is Silicon Valley couldn’t be more complacent in 2021.

They are the ultimate corporate entity and more monolithic than ever.

Smart CFO’s are continuing the gravy train by diving deep into stock buybacks to boost stock prices and the dividends are the extra kicker.

The iPhone maker repurchased $19 billion of stock in the first quarter, bringing the total for the past fourth quarters to $77 billion.

GOOGL repurchased a record $11.4 billion of stock in the first quarter, up from $8.5 billion a year earlier, and FB bought back $3.9 billion, triple the total a year ago.

Now, they even got the White House to do their dirty work.  

Huawei, the Chinese telecom company, has been the punching bag for the White House’s tech war with China.

In remarks to reporters in March 2019, Chinese politician Guo Ping said, “The U.S. government has a loser’s attitude. They want to smear Huawei because they can’t compete with us.”

Let’s get this straight, U.S. tech was never behind China and still isn’t, but I do believe the U.S. should simply outcompete with Huawei because I know they can and have the capacity to do so.

China hasn’t done much with 5G as well aside from amassing the patents, but they haven’t made it quite practical to the Chinese public as a use case for consumer products.

Instead of competing, we have Facebook tapping the political back channels to encourage the U.S. government to ban TikTok, not because it threatens Facebook’s model but because Facebook is concerned about national security.

This is from the same Mark Zuckerberg that has been attempting to destroy Snapchat (SNAP) for years after SNAP’s CEO Evan Spiegel refused to sell it to Zuckerberg.

So why innovate? Why deploy capital into research and development when you can just nick a crown jewel and make it your own?

Exactly, so innovation does not happen and will not happen.

We, as consumers, have been thrust into the cluster of ever-degrading smartphone apps that offer less and less utility.  

But ultimately, even if you hate Silicon Valley at a personal level, it is literally impossible to bet against them, because all this posturing behind the scenes does boost the share price and that’s what this technology letter is about.

As we are whipsawed into this muddling world of partially vaccinated economies, tech will consolidate after they deliver earnings only to prepare for the next leg up in shares.

Sure, this year’s growth and EPS estimates have been priced perfectly, but we will start to move onto next years’ bounty and these models have never been more profitable.

Don’t fight the trend.

Silicon Valley

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2021-07-28 15:02:002021-08-03 01:23:57The Real Rules of Tech
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

July 21, 2021

Diary, Newsletter, Summary

Global Market Comments
July 21, 2021
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(AN INSIDER’S GUIDE TO THE NEXT DECADE OF TECH INVESTMENT),
(AMZN), (AAPL), (NFLX), (AMD), (INTC), (TSLA), (GOOG), (FB)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2021-07-21 10:04:512021-07-21 11:05:02July 21, 2021
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

July 12, 2021

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
July 12, 2021
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(RIDE THE MOMENTUM)
(SHOP), (NFLX), (FB), (AMZN), (GOOGL), (NFLX), (AAPL), (MSFT)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2021-07-12 13:04:142021-07-12 16:01:51July 12, 2021
Page 12 of 35«‹1011121314›»

tastytrade, Inc. (“tastytrade”) has entered into a Marketing Agreement with Mad Hedge Fund Trader (“Marketing Agent”) whereby tastytrade pays compensation to Marketing Agent to recommend tastytrade’s brokerage services. The existence of this Marketing Agreement should not be deemed as an endorsement or recommendation of Marketing Agent by tastytrade and/or any of its affiliated companies. Neither tastytrade nor any of its affiliated companies is responsible for the privacy practices of Marketing Agent or this website. tastytrade does not warrant the accuracy or content of the products or services offered by Marketing Agent or this website. Marketing Agent is independent and is not an affiliate of tastytrade. 

Legal Disclaimer

There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.

Copyright © 2025. Mad Hedge Fund Trader. All Rights Reserved. support@madhedgefundtrader.com
Scroll to top