“Science and technology are a propellant for building a thriving country, and the happiness of the people and the future of the country hinge on their development.” – Said Supreme Leader of North Korea since 2011 Kim Jong Un
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
May 19, 2021
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE CURRENT STATE OF U.S. ECOMMERCE)
(AMZN), (WMT), (KR), (COST)
Was 2020 a one-hit-wonder for U.S. ecommerce sales?
Hardly so.
US retail ecommerce sales grew 33.6% in 2020, reaching $799.18 billion.
As the public health situation fizzles out, in-store shopping will refresh itself, and a share of consumer spending will revert away from retail and toward services like travel and live entertainment.
Consensus has it that U.S. ecommerce will grow 13.7% this year, reaching $908.73 billion, and although that would be a great year under normal circumstances, annualized growth of 13% appears pitiful compared to the pandemic numbers.
It was only at the beginning of 2020 that ecommerce was expected to grow 13.2% from 2019, but the health crisis ignited ecommerce sales to $799.18 billion.
Ecommerce growth from a much higher base is a hard endeavor as all the low-hanging fruit has been harvested and it’s just harder to push the needle higher.
What does this all mean?
Ecommerce represents a larger piece of the pie than ever before and that comes with greater influence.
I now expect ecommerce sales will account for 15.5% of the $5.856 trillion in total retail sales this year.
Ecommerce sales will surpass $1 trillion next year.
It also means that digital commerce has never been so strong in terms of a percentage growth basis, net total basis, and clout.
However, growth rates will need to moderate first before they can reaccelerate.
Looking at the financial year, look for sales to rise by a low single for the big-box retailer Walmart (WMT) showing that numbers are getting ahead of themselves.
Walmart is an accurate bellwether stock that gives us deep insight into the state of ecommerce, and they said it sees earnings rising by a high single-digit percent.
Guidance aside, Walmart had a great quarter.
Every segment performed well, and I am encouraged by traffic and grocery market share trends.
But customers clearly want to get out and shop which is why growth rates will most likely drop around 13% for ecommerce instead of staying north of 30%.
Walmart’s ecommerce continues to grow and stimulus in the U.S. had an outsized impact, and the second half has more uncertainty than a typical year because the reopening is a once-in-a-lifetime phenomenon and it’s hard to pinpoint the shake out.
Remember, there most likely will not be any broad-based stimulus payments in the 2nd half of 2021 and 2022 that will be rolled into Walmart ecommerce sales.
Walmart is clearly chasing the leader of the pack Amazon.
Amazon is on track to become the largest retailer in the United States within the next four years, followed by the aforementioned Walmart and Kroger.
Kroger has been a fashionable pick amongst hedge fund managers in the beginning of 2021.
Amazon (AMZN) gross merchandise value sales (GMV) will top $631.6 billion by 2025, representing a compound annual growth rate of 14% between 2020 and 2025.
The same report showed us that Walmart’s ecommerce sales are set to grow at a five-year CAGR of 14.9% from $43.6 billion in 2020 to $87.5 billion in 2025, accounting for 16.7% of total retailer sales in 2025.
Ecommerce is the only channel that will grow in the next 5 years, everything else, such as offline retail will contract or go sideways at best.
It’s a death by a thousand cuts type of dilemma for anyone that isn’t in ecommerce.
Costco (COST), the fourth largest U.S. retailer, is expected to invest heavily in its digital business, with its online sales set to increase by 47% over the same period, reaching $15.3bn in 2025.
Over the next few years, Generation Z will age into adulthood and bring with them a digital wallet and firms will need to focus investment online and engage with the digital ecosystem in order to win market share.
Gen Z doesn’t use cash.
Online grocery is set to stay even in healthy times, but the pace of growth for online grocery will level off after the 2020 explosion.
Fresh grocery ecommerce is still expected to grow at 13.3% CAGR between now and 2025 which is why you see many retailers like Walmart investing in the fresh foods’ delivery business.
Habits are hard to break and it’s clear that digital add-ons are here to stay, and brands must cultivate digital platforms to win.
“Our intuition about the future is linear. But the reality of information technology is exponential, and that makes a profound difference. If I take 30 steps linearly, I get to 30. If I take 30 steps exponentially, I get to a billion.” – Said American inventor and futurist Raymond Kurzweil
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
May 17, 2021
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(MULTIPLE CONTRACTION)
(QQQ), (AAPL), (GOOGL), (MSFT), (TDOC), (TSLA)
High multiple tech stocks often overshoot on the way up and overshoot on the way down.
This is predominately driven by uncontrolled momentum as investors and traders resort to margin to borrow money and add leverage to positions and trends that seem to be working at the time.
Since the start of the year, technology has had to come to grips with a sudden rerating of valuations.
For example, a bellwether stock for the future success of tech, Tesla (TSLA) has corrected 20% year-to-date after more than 700% move up in 2020.
Reliable big-cap tech has been more steadfast in 2021 such as the likes of Apple (AAPL) who have only experienced a less than 2% year-to-date decline in shares.
The biggest winner so far of big-cap tech has to be Alphabet (GOOGL) whose shares have risen around 25% since the beginning of the year.
Even with sky-high expectations, Google is hitting it out of the ballpark and then some.
Simply meeting or doing a nudge over expectations this past earnings season has proved not enough for underlying shares to surge on the results meaning we are fully priced.
Naturally, the more speculative business has felt the worst of the carnage with SPACs down half from their peaks and “artisanal” tech down 30%-50%.
This doesn’t mean tech is over.
Hardly so – It’s just resting.
But readers and investors will need to traverse through a period of multiple contraction and consolidation as high-priced tech stocks are re-rated lower until we reach appetizing multiples.
Simply put, we got ahead of ourselves and there is only so much leverage that can be taken out to chase the rainbows and feed off the momentum.
Microsoft (MSFT) has been another stout stock that is up around 12% year-to-date and a great place to hide out during the consolidation phase.
The cause of the rerating derives specifically from upper management guiding down future revenue and profitability targets.
I have read countless earnings reports that describe a comprehensive dilemma in which the overall structure of the company couldn’t be healthier yet beating prior years’ Covid performance is impossible on a year-to-year basis.
Readers need to understand this year is still priced as a Covid year, but tech companies won’t nearly do as well because the conditions that engulfed Covid like work-from-home and the absence of a vaccine are not here anymore.
There is a health solution in the U.S. and in parts of Europe there are partial solutions and certainly, no lockdown as the Chief of the CDC signals masks are not needed for the vaccinated in public.
The tech market needs to readjust its expectations that will hand off to more of a normalized metric environment and that will happen naturally as we move closer to 2022 and into it.
On a calculation basis, comparing data from 2022 and 2021 will strip out the volatility from the 2020 and 2021 comparisons.
Remember that management uses the prior year as reference points for performance and that phenomenon is now hurting the appearance of relative outperformance.
A top executive at a fintech company had this to say, “The pandemic has accelerated a digital wave of change across almost every industry by three to five years, unleashing a profound and permanent structural transformation.”
I’ll take a 5-year digital transformation in one year if the second year is a time that is needed for earnings’ expectations to consolidate for half a year or so.
I would take that deal anytime if it was my company.
The data also suggests how breathtaking companies like Google and Microsoft are if their future guidance is immune to any expectation.
They are beating whatever consensus is in a Covid year or not.
Take a look at some of the darlings of tech in the height of pandemic like Teladoc (TDOC), and shares are off around 33% year-to-date and even went through a 40% drop from mid-February to the beginning of March.
Avoid those now!
Even if it's not related to cloud software stocks, the dearth of semiconductor chips is beginning to cause pain in every nook and cranny of the global economy catalyzing many firms to delay or even cancel production let alone roll out new models.
This adds to the global malaise of a supply chain that many managements describe as “topsy-turvy.”
Not only is the bottleneck happening as we speak, but it appears as though it could last at least 2 or more years.
When the Fed talks about “transitory” inflationary pressures, at least as it relates to tech, I am not sure what they are smoking.
There has been no concrete data in which they have offered to suggest that it will be transitory unless they have a different definition of transitory from mine.
The accumulation effect of these pressures is why the tech-heavy Taiwan stock market, FTSE TWSE Taiwan 50 Index, comprised of tech stalwarts like Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM) and Hon Hai Precision Industry, declined over 2% today after losing over 8% last week.
Ultimately, investors are moving to higher ground and seeking predictable profitability and raw size over elevated growth rates and loss-making EPS figures.
When the goalposts move, we must move with them and that is what has happened.
Tech investors are more conservative than last year and until the goalposts widen a bit as I expect as we move into Q3 and Q4, we need to be aware of the new rules of the game or who gets penalized for them.
“Technology is cool, but you've got to use it as opposed to letting it use you.” Said American Singer/Songwriter Prince
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
May 14, 2021
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE GOLDEN ERA OF CYBERSECURITY SPEND)
(PANW), (FTNT), (CRWD), (AMZN), (GOOGL), (ORCL), (MSFT), (IBM)
The tech sector and the U.S. government are poised to engage in a more transactional relationship than ever before after the cybersecurity attack on Colonial Pipeline and the U.S. President’s executive order that followed it.
This doesn’t mean just servicing an email account, but this will incorporate broad-based networking cloud infrastructure from the top-down and the bits in between.
Technology is just getting too good, too fast, and applicable to the point that it allows nefarious actors to wield it in a way that could damage and permanently set back sovereign nations and global business.
Don’t get me wrong, this was already in the works, and U.S. President Joe Biden has signaled his intent to ramp up the IT spent, but this cyberattack that is causing gas hoarding in parts of South Eastern United States is just the event to really kick this initiative into overdrive.
Colonial Pipeline paid the almost $5 million ransom payment that will encourage similar type of behavior in the long-term.
The Cyberattack also means that the relationship between U.S. tech and government could swerve from net negative of a relentless anti-monopoly narrative to one in which big tech will be anointed as the saviors to the foreign cyber-criminals and paid handsomely to defend the operations of private and state U.S. business.
The latter sounds much better to Silicon Valley than the former and the bigwigs in Silicon Valley might ostensibly push this marketing dynamic of internet protection to save their bacon and get the regulatory heat off their back.
Polarizing figures such as U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren have made it a point to bash big tech whenever she sees fit which is more often than not.
CEOs like Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg have tried a disingenuous approach of blaming China’s marginal data privacy policies as a way to protect its Instagram business and prevent growth monster TikTok, a Chinese app, from cannibalizing its cash cow business.
The origin of the Colonial Attack is purportedly to be Russian which would offer more fuel to the fire and create a ready-made reason for U.S. government to pour incremental billions into Silicon Valley and its array of almost multi-trillion dollar heavy hitters while protecting their business moat.
This event also means Tesla is toast in China.
Officials in China banned Tesla vehicles from military bases and housing compounds amid concerns that potentially sensitive data from its onboard cameras could be collected and stored on Tesla servers.
Once the data privacy genie is out of the bottle, it’s hard to contain the fallout and Tesla will need to adopt a whack-a-mole strategy in China which often proves futile in the long-term.
The United States faces persistent and increasingly sophisticated malicious cyber campaigns that threaten the public sector, the private sector, and ultimately the American people’s security and privacy.
This is all just the beginning, a little taste of what’s on the menu.
Collaborating with U.S tech companies to improve its efforts to identify, deter, protect against, detect, and respond to these actions and actors is now a must.
The Federal Government must also carefully examine what occurred during any major cyber incident and apply lessons learned.
Incremental improvements will not offer the security Americans need; instead, the Federal Government needs to make bold changes and significant investments in order to defend the vital institutions that underpin the American way of life.
It’s the authorities’ job and to offer resources to protect and secure its computer systems, whether they are cloud-based, on-premise, or hybrid.
The scope of protection and security must include systems that process data (information technology (IT)) and those that run the vital machinery that ensures our safety (operational technology (OT)).
Contracts will be signed with IT and OT service providers to conduct an array of day-to-day functions on Federal Information Systems. These service providers, including cloud service providers, have unique access to and insight into cyber threat and incident information on Federal Information Systems.
Increasing the sharing of information about such threats, incidents, and risks, and enabling more effective defense of agencies’ systems and of information collected, processed, and maintained by or for the Government are necessary steps to accelerating incident deterrence, prevention, and response efforts.
The executive order signed by Biden shows that within 60 days, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget will hash out “language for contracting with IT and OT service providers and recommend updates.”
The U.S. must take decisive steps to modernize its approach to cybersecurity and must increase the Federal Government’s visibility into threats while protecting privacy and civil liberties.
Money will be spent to accelerate movement to secure cloud services, including Software as a Service (SaaS), Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), and Platform as a Service (PaaS); centralize and streamline access to cybersecurity data to drive analytics for identifying and managing cybersecurity risks; and invest in both technology and personnel to match these modernization goals.
Prioritizing money spent on addressing “critical software” will translate into huge paydays to many cloud providers and not just the big guys.
Most recently, The Central Intelligence Agency awarded its long-awaited Commercial Cloud Enterprise, or C2E, contract to five companies—Amazon Web Services (AMZN), Microsoft (MSFT), Google (GOOGL), Oracle (ORCL), and IBM (IBM).
No doubt they will be vying for more government procurement contracts since they already have one hand in the honey jar.
At a lower level, readers should consider buying cybersecurity companies Fortinet (FTNT), Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW), and CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (CRWD), but these smaller names come with more volatility.
This event really anoints the impending future as the golden era of IT cybersecurity spend and it will never go back to what it once was.
Paying for IT protection is here for the long haul and this goes for private companies and public institutions.
Nearly 80% of senior IT and IT security leaders believe their organizations lack sufficient protection against cyberattacks despite increased IT security investments made in 2020 to deal with distributed IT and work-from-home challenges, according to a new IDG Research Services survey commissioned by Insight Enterprises.
There will be a huge boom in IT cybersecurity spend because CEOs don’t want to be the idiot that allowed cybercriminals to hijack their whole business.
That’s the fastest way to end a management career.
Last time I checked, it’s a hard slog up the corporate ladder to land a prime CEO gig and it’s not getting any easier.
“Technology is a useful servant but a dangerous master.” - Said Norwegian historian, teacher, and political scientist Christian Lous Lange
