Mad Hedge Technology Letter
September 2, 2020
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE 2020 TECH BUBBLE)
(TSLA), (APPL), (AMZN), (NFLX)
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
September 2, 2020
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE 2020 TECH BUBBLE)
(TSLA), (APPL), (AMZN), (NFLX)
It was February 19 when the tech comprised Nasdaq index swan dived from a liquidity crisis of epic proportions triggered by the virus only to recover the 30% of loss gains in 3 months.
When the Nasdaq made a V-shaped recovery, experts were shocked by the pace of the recovery as the Fed deployed every tool in the toolbox at saving the stock market.
Well, three months on from the Nasdaq index pulling level year to date, tech stocks are 20% higher as main street still labors under an economy that has seen net job losses of 10s of millions.
The liquidity poured into the system has been overwhelming, but many investors aren’t complaining.
Insane price action is the crucial signal to this market frothiness and can be seen in Tesla (TSLA) whose stock has gone from $85 in March to almost $500.
Apple (AAPL) has surpassed the $2 trillion mark.
The market is “looking through” any bad news and is putting a high premium on tech shares that have usurped the mojo of the rest of the broader economy.
Investors need to be in tech because it’s not only where the growth is, but it is where business models are mostly protected.
Last time I checked, computers and smartphones cannot get the coronavirus.
Billionaire Mark Cuban, team owner of Dallas Mavericks in the NBA, sees a huge tech bubble reminiscent of the infamous dot.com fiasco in the late 1990s and early 2000s.
Suddenly, the get-rich-quick crowd is investing with reckless abandon. It seems these upstarts have a fear of missing out and are chasing the market. Cuban is skeptical about the market rally and the bubble could burst in a couple of years.
Unlike the tech debacle at the turn of the millennium, Cuban opines that this year’s version has the Federal Reserve’s help. The U.S. central bank is pumping money into the pandemic-battered economy, but unintentionally supporting risk appetite on Wall Street. Bolder investors are even picking up shares of bankrupt companies.
People have a newfound interest in the stock market and hopping on the bandwagon because the Feds are injecting money to prop up the economy.
Cuban has investments in Amazon (AMZN) and Netflix (NFLX).
Shopify happens to be the largest publicly-listed company in Canada as of July 31, 2020, besting bank giant Royal Bank of Canada.
The 16-year old e-commerce company year-to-date gain is 170%.
I believe in the wisdom of crowds, and that markets have gotten it right far more often than they’ve been wrong.
Ultimately, there are simply too many dollars chasing too few trades.
Tech stocks have driven much of the U.S. market’s gains since March. Were it not for a handful of them, the S&P 500 may have performed more in line with other economies’ stock indices.
Between the market bottom on March 23 and August 20, shares of Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Facebook, Alphabet, and graphics processor designer NVIDIA were responsible for a heart-stopping 33 percent—an entire third—of the uptrend in the S&P 500.
Apple alone was responsible for more than 11 percent of the market’s moves. Last week, the iPhone-maker became the first U.S. company to surpass $2 trillion in market capitalization, nearly as much as all the companies in the Russell 2000 Index of small-cap stocks combined. Apple is now valued more highly, in fact, than German stocks in the Deutsche Boerse Index and is closing in on Canadian stocks in the S&P/TSX Composite Index.
We are seeing unprecedented price action in the tech sector with the old normal of 1% gains in one trading day turning into 3% or 5%.
We will need some type of liquidity prevention event to experience a real major sell-off in technology and it is true, the higher we go, the harder we will fall.
“I want to put a ding in the universe.” – Said Co-Founder of Apple Steve Jobs
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
August 31, 2020
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(WALMART’S QUEST TO BECOME THE NEXT AMAZON)
(WMT), (MSFT), (ORCL), (GOOGL), (AMZN)
U.S. tech is about to hit a 10-bagger when TikTok is set to choose between the Microsoft (MSFT)-Walmart hybrid offer or one from Oracle (ORCL) in the next 48 hours.
The network effect that will result from this purchase will be staggering and still underhyped in the mainstream media.
I am on record saying that Walmart is the new Fang, and their ambitions prove it.
Walmart (WMT) wanted to be the majority owner of TikTok, but the U.S. government wanted a technology company to be the lead investor.
I am not sure how that makes sense in an age where every company is a tech company.
Walmart was originally in a consortium with Google (GOOGL) before moving over in recent days to partner with Microsoft (MSFT) when it became clear the retailer would not be able to lead the deal.
Walmart is validating my thesis that it is a hybrid ecommerce company with its last earnings report 2 weeks ago.
In the company’s Q2 earnings, Walmart reported its U.S. ecommerce sales were up 97% — an increase attributed to more customers shopping online during the pandemic, stocking up on household supplies and shopping for grocery items online.
The TikTok deal first started with Walmart negotiating with SoftBank Chief Operating Officer Marcelo Claure.
SoftBank’s Claure believed Walmart’s all-American image and Google’s cloud computing infrastructure backbone could be a way in for the Japanese technology company.
The deal structure would have had Walmart as the lead buyer, with SoftBank and Alphabet acquiring minority stakes. One or two other minority holders held talks to join too but this ultimately was nixed by the U.S. government.
Walmart’s goal is to become the exclusive e-commerce and payments provider for TikTok and have access to user data to enhance those capabilities.
U.S. national security hawks need to save face by having a thoroughbred U.S. tech company lead the deal to show that this isn’t just about underhanded economic mercantilism.
Google could face significant antitrust opposition if it acquired TikTok’s U.S. assets.
Amazon is out of the picture too for anti-trust worries.
These concerns caused the consortium to crumble last week and led Walmart, which had become increasingly convinced that TikTok fits into its strategy, to partner with Microsoft on a bid instead.
TikTok is pondering which way to go – either the Microsoft-Walmart bid or a rival offer from Oracle. A deal, which is set to value TikTok’s U.S. operations in the $20 billion to $30 billion range, could be completed in the next 48 hours.
What does this mean for Walmart?
Walmart is hellbent on directly competing with Amazon prime for that same ecommerce market.
Walmart ecommerce sales now total more than $10 billion in quarterly U.S. ecommerce sales, exceeding 11.4% of the retail giant’s overall U.S. net sales for the first time.
The achievement reflects the ongoing shift toward online shopping amid the pandemic, and the increasingly fuzzy line between online and physical retail sales. It is also an example of the pandemic accelerating the shift to digital commerce at traditional brick-and-mortar retailers.
The timing isn’t a coincidence with Walmart on the verge of rolling out its own Amazon Prime service dubbed Walmart+.
Walmart’s new membership program is expected to cost $98/year, competing with Amazon’s $119/year Prime membership.
Amazon’s global online sales are 4.5X larger than Walmart’s at $45.9 billion for the quarter, up nearly 50%, and its physical retail sales were $3.8 billion, down 13% from the same period a year ago.
Walmart has significant headway to make before it comes close to Amazon Prime but there are fertile pastures in front of them, meaning I believe Walmart is a conviction buy at these levels.
At the bare minimum, this is a conspicuous sign of intent for Walmart that has successfully turned around the titanic and is a real time player in ecommerce.
They will be on the prowl for other tech purchases in the future as well as they certainly have the cash flow to pull the trigger on adding more tech talent to the lineup.
If Walmart reels in TikTok, I recommend long-term investors to buy Walmart as a tech growth asset and it is easily a $200 stock.
“The tailwinds we’re experiencing are accelerating our progress to build a healthier eCommerce busines as we add new brands, improve product mix, grow the marketplace and achieve more fixed-cost leverage.” – Said CEO of Walmart Doug McMillon
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
August 28, 2020
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE MISHAP OF THE CENTURY)
(AIRBNB)
The dumbest feeling person in tech right now has to be CEO and Co-Founder of Airbnb Brian Chesky.
The short-term accommodation platform was valued at $31 billion in its last funding round in 2017 and this year was the year that Chesky and Co. had earmarked to go public.
The company was the beneficiary of a secular tech tailwind aided by missteps from a dinosaur hotel industry and carved out a unique product linking hosts and travelers for the purpose of filling in short-term accommodation.
Skirting regulation was the cherry on top.
Airbnb pockets a commission of 6% of the total booking amount, meaning they are overwhelmingly reliant on volume to build sales.
There are more than 7 million homes in 220 countries and regions that have earned over $80 billion since the company started.
Like many things in life – a window of time is all you get.
Last year was that window of time when a smorgasbord of private tech unicorns delivered public markets new tradable assets such as Uber, Peloton, Pinterest, and Lyft.
Even though these stock shares performed worse than expected, it offered long time employees and shareholders a chance to finally cash in.
After going public, any loss from underperforming shares would be absorbed by the public.
Airbnb’s management even had enough time to observe ex-CEO of Uber Travis Kalanick sell off $1.7 billion in stock following the end of the company’s IPO lockup period highlighting the ample period of time Airbnb had to come to the public markets if they wanted to in 2019.
The 2019 loss of $322 million in the first nine months was no big deal and mainly attributed to ramping up marketing.
Then the coronavirus suddenly took the world by storm and everything changed.
Brian Chesky’s arrogance has cost his shareholders $20 billion.
What about the future?
The next “disruptor” of Airbnb could appear in 24 months as well – who knows?
Operations will cost more in 24 months and not less, and a healthy supply of units is not guaranteed to be the same if hosts mass foreclose on properties or a mirror image competitor who attempts to undercut Airbnb appears.
It is rumored that close to 1 out of 3 Airbnb hosts are reliant on their monthly Airbnb income to pay mortgages, which would suggest a poor formula in this type of souring economic climate.
This entire short-term rental industry buttressed by tech platforms could be due for a wholesale washout.
How bad is the situation now?
Airbnb took a hit to the tune of over $50 million in booking revenues over the past several weeks in strategic cities that are close to coronavirus hot zones.
The home-sharing startup’s booking revenues cratered across 17 key international cities over a span of five weeks starting at the beginning of February, and the pain isn’t over yet as cities and countries go into full-blown lockdowns and crisis mode.
At first, it was just China, whose Airbnb’s booking revenues dropped 25%, losing $17.6 million, but that was just the canary in the coalmine.
And that poor number comes in the context of expected growth of roughly plus $30 million if booking revenues had continued growing at the same pace of nearly 35% the firm saw in those markets over the same period last year.
In total, the China business registered a negative swing of nearly $48 million because of the virus.
Even though the virus originated in Wuhan, the contagion quickly spread to Shanghai, Beijing, Seoul, Singapore, Hong Kong and Tokyo wreaking havoc on Airbnb listings.
Western cities are going through the same barrage of Airbnb cancellations and non-bookings in the tourist meccas of Paris, London, Prague, Barcelona, Milan, Rome, and New York.
Airbnb has now enacted an extenuating circumstances policy allowing guests to cancel eligible reservations without charge, and the host is required to refund the reservation, irrespective of the previously contracted cancellation policy.
I unquestionably blame Chesky for the bleak situation Airbnb is grappling with in terms of bringing the company to public markets.
They secretly filed for an IPO in 2020 at only half the valuation Airbnb fetched pre-virus.
He failed to do what many unicorn leaders accomplished, which was, by hell or high water, transfer risk to the public market during the late innings of the economic cycle (or before) which we can almost convincingly say ended in January 2020.
Was it worth eking out the extra year or two of growth for another 10% “growth” of incremental value?
The greediness has been exposed and now briskly punished.
Now the company has no room for error while going into full-on damage control for the foreseeable future.
The economic mayhem has put a premium on tech companies with positive cash flow, high margins, competitive advantage, and profits.
A company like Microsoft perfectly illustrates this character set while Airbnb just clung onto its start-up growth model for too long when it easily had the chance to become profitable two years ago.
Avoid Airbnb shares when they hit the public markets – no need to care for damaged goods.
My bet is that ultimately, Google will use this crisis to steal Airbnb’s business and there is nothing they can do about it. They are in the process of developing a property rental platform eerily similar to Airbnb.
“The American dream, what we were taught was, grow up, own a car, own a house. I think that dream's completely changing. We were taught to keep up with the Joneses. Now we're sharing with the Joneses.” – Said CEO of Airbnb Brian Chesky
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
August 26, 2020
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE EMPTY PIPELINE OF TECH INNOVATION)
(AAPL), (FB), (AMZN), (GOOGL), (NFLX), (TSLA), (SNAP), (MSFT), (ORCL), (TWTR)
Legal Disclaimer
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.
