• support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Member Login
Mad Hedge Fund Trader
  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Luncheons
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
MHFTR

The Regulation Effect

Tech Letter

Locking horns with large cap technology companies in court is inconceivable for regulators in Washington.

Yes, it is their job to put out fires left, right, and center, but when the scorching inferno reaches full intensity, regulators hit the pass button.

Taking on an industry that employs an army of lawyers and data analysts up the wazoo is frightful.

Tech wants to make the skirmish into a resource fight and no cohort has more ammunition than these four companies.

They are already on the way to create more unregulated industries simply because they do not exist yet.

This is why regulators cannot keep up with the nimbleness on display by the tech industry.

They are always one, maybe two steps ahead.

Investors have been able to digest consequences of the data fiasco fueling an even more bullish narrative for the likes of Facebook (FB) and Alphabet (GOOGL).

Facebook and Alphabet are the two laggards in the vaunted FANG group, only because they are up against Netflix (NFLX) and Amazon (AMZN), two of the most transformational companies of the gig economy generation.

Facebook and Alphabet give traders entry points; Amazon and Netflix hardly ever.

Investors are hard pressed to find days when Amazon and Netflix drop more than 1%, and a brief respite is met with a torrent of new buying.

Even more of a head-scratcher is the American law etched into the books, calculating harm by connecting it with price increases, underscoring the FANG's dominant position.

It is almost impossible to prove caused "harm" because Alphabet and Facebook services are free. However, the free service is a misnomer, because of the extreme manipulation of data allowing tech titans to profit from data opportunities instead of charging customers a service fee.

The Mad Hedge Technology Letter has been rolling out a steady dose of Facebook recommendations since its inception to scintillating effect.

The Cambridge Analytica scandal stoked mayhem on the global news waves ravaging Facebook shares from $192 down to $153.

Investors were panicking and rightly so. A precipitous drop is nothing investors with skin in the game like to see.

The Mad Hedge Technology Letter saw it as a gift from the celestial stars and ushered subscribers into this suave stock at $168, to reread this memorable story please click here.

Facebook has gone from strength to strength blowing past expectations celebrating all-time highs of a recent intraday price of $207 earlier this week.

I am still highly bullish on Facebook, even more so after the first fines were doled out for the recent scandals.

Under the old data laws in Britain, Facebook was fined a grand total of $660,000 along with a detailed report from the Information Commissioner's Office castigating Facebook's business practices.

This amount is peanuts for Facebook, practically equaling the cost of providing a16-person security detail for CEO Mark Zuckerberg around his Palo Alto, California, estate for maybe two weeks.

If Facebook can hold down these fines to inconsequential amounts, regulation will be a decisive tailwind going forward.

How does a headwind turn into a tailwind in the blink of an eye?

General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) rolled out in Europe lately has helped Alphabet and Facebook solidify their digital ad business.

Alphabet has adopted a stringent version of the rules to its new model because the behemoth does not need to take on the added risk of noncompliance.

Marginal companies do.

The possibility of exorbitant fines clearly grabbed the attention of Silicon Valley CEOs, and they have put the ball in motion to insulate themselves from such downside risk.

Unsurprisingly, Alphabet has a higher opt-in consent rate than its smaller tech brethren.

Users are more comfortably entrusting data to an Alphabet instead of a smaller unknown that could potentially be 10 times worse than Alphabet.

Uncertainty breeds risk aversion.

Recent data shows other companies have a galling time keeping up with the same percentage of consent as Alphabet.

You cannot expect a college basketball player to perform miracles like Steph Curry.

This puts Alphabet in a healthier strategic position as the users who consent are five times more valuable to digital ad exchanges and easier to monetize.

Other ad exchanges face an uphill battle against Alphabet if they cannot increase the rate of consent.

The extra premium is derived from the ability to personalize the advertisements boosting the conversion rate for sellers.

Alphabet has in effect increased its quality of data just by being Alphabet.

It is certainly not fair, but life is not fair.

And then there is the conundrum of where do you go if you do not want to sell on Alphabet or Facebook?

Well, Twitter (TWTR), Snapchat (SNAP), and Instagram (owned by Facebook) are the other alternatives fighting for the scraps.

The battle to get users to consent is really the be-all and end-all for many of these ad sellers.

Facebook and Alphabet have seen the best results and will likely extend their hegemony.

Recently, Alphabet has been offering 15% less ads on its exchange. But, it all involves consented users demonstrating the unenviable position for other exchanges to match Alphabet's quality.

The EU antirust watchdog is expected to levy a multi-billion dollar fine for abusing its dominant position of its Android operating system.

This comes on the heals of fining Alphabet $2.82 billion last year for abusing the dominance of a search again.

The stock barely budged on this news.

Alphabet's punishment for being too dominant in Europe is laughable.

When a company is punished for being too good then you sit back and admire from afar.

There is no other company that can undermine its position and even hit with billions in fines - its leadership status is unquestioned.

American readers sometimes forget the popularity of the Android ecosystem outside of America because of the ubiquitous nature of iPhones stateside. The network effect has made it impossible to do business in Europe without collaborating with the Android platform.

Facebook took more than eight years to reach a billion users but only half that time to reach the next billion.

The stock has held up relatively well. The 73% market share of digital ad dollars Facebook and Alphabet extracted in 2017 is up from 63% in 2015.

This two-headed monster shows no sign of abating, demonstrated by taking in 83% of all digital ad growth, leaving the crumbs for the rest.

They are specialists at exploiting their business environments, much like mining companies exploit the earth.

Their platforms are so influential, they turn elections on its head.

Governments are scared of taking them down, empowering these companies to new heights creating a massive halo effect worldwide.

The Chinese communist government has even used Chinese social media platforms to establish an Orwellian surveillance system monitoring its people at all times. Such is the power of technology these days.

Users are forced to accept any conditional terms they offer, because many jobs are reliant on these platforms such as the millions of app developers hustling to create the new hot app.

They all have families to feed.

On an individual level, people would not sacrifice a cushy income because they do not wish to consent to tracking services.

The next step is for the Amazons and Alphabets to ramp up their private label businesses using their high-quality treasure trove of data.

Amazon has been the leader in selling its own products from tech behemoths, and that percentage in terms of overall sales will increase over time.

It does not need others to sell products they can make themselves for cheaper, better quality retaining every cent.

Amazon's private label is geared toward decent quality and low prices capturing the volume of transactions desired.

Bundling services, exploiting the data, and applying discriminatory pricing will become the new normal for these powerful platforms and nobody does that better than Amazon.

It has no incentive to allow eyeballs, data and dollars to escape these proprietary walled gardens hence the term walled gardens.

Even more genius, Facebook and Alphabet can track users outside their walled gardens if they are signed into their Facebook or Google accounts.

Granted, Facebook has had better price action of late as traders understand there has been no lasting effect from the misuse of leaked data.

However, Alphabet has the crown jewel of the next leg up in A.I. (Artificial Intelligence) - Waymo. Waymo is a company I have chronicled in the past leading the race in autonomous driving inching closer to full-scale deployment sometime in the next year.

If you think Alphabet and Facebook shares are lofty now and "overbought," then I cannot imagine what you'll think when these companies dominate further because the runway is as far as the eye can see.

 

 

 

 

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Quote of the Day

"One machine can do the work of 50 ordinary men. No machine can do the work of one extraordinary man," - said American author Elbert Hubbard.

 

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-07-16 01:05:242018-07-16 01:05:24The Regulation Effect
MHFTR

July 13, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
July 13, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(THE FANGS' PATH TO ONLINE BANKING),
(SQ), (V), (MA), (AXP), (JPM)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-07-13 01:06:242018-07-13 01:06:24July 13, 2018
MHFTR

July 12, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
July 12, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(NEWSPAPERS REALLY KNOW WHO YOU ARE),
(TRNC), (AMZN), (FB), (GOOGL), (USPS), (SFTBY)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-07-12 01:06:272018-07-12 01:06:27July 12, 2018
MHFTR

July 11, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
July 11, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(MASAYOSHI SON'S VISION TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD),
(SFTBY), (BABA), (NVDA)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-07-11 01:06:022018-07-11 01:06:02July 11, 2018
MHFTR

July 10, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
July 10, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CONUNDRUM),
(TSLA), (AMZN), (FB)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-07-10 01:06:152018-07-10 01:06:15July 10, 2018
MHFTR

July 9, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
July 9, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(HOW ENVIRONMENTALISTS MAY KILL OFF BITCOIN),
(BTC), (ETH), (TWTR), (SQ)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-07-09 01:06:192018-07-09 01:06:19July 9, 2018
MHFTR

How Environmentalists May Kill Off Bitcoin

Tech Letter

If Jack Dorsey's proclamation that bitcoin will be anointed the global "single currency," it could spawn a crescendo of pollution the world has never seen before.

In a candid interview with The Times of London, Dorsey, the workaholic CEO of Twitter (TWTR) and Square (SQ), offered a 10-year time horizon for his claim to come to fruition.

The originators of cryptocurrency derive from a Robin Hood-type mentality circumnavigating the costly fees and control associated with banks and central governments.

Unfolding before our eyes is a potential catastrophe that knows no limits.

Carbon emissions are on track to cut short 153 million lives as environmental issues start to spin out of control while the world's population explodes to 9.7 billion in 2050, from 8.5 billion people in 2030, up from the 7.3 billion today.

All these people will need to barter in bitcoin, according to Jack Dorsey.

Cryptocurrency is demoralizingly energy intensive, and the recent institutional participation in crypto server farms will exacerbate the environmental knock on effects by displacing communities, destroying wildlife, and climate-changing carbon emissions.

This seemingly controversial means to outmaneuver the modern financial system has transformed into a murky arms race among greedy cryptocurrency miners to use the cheapest energy sources and the most efficient equipment in a no-holds-barred money grab.

Bitcoin and Ethereum mining combined energy consumption would place them as the 38th-largest energy consuming country in the world - if they were a country - one place ahead of Austria.

Mining a bitcoin adjacent to a hydropower dam is not a coincidence. In fact, these locales are ground zero for the mining movement. The common denominator is the access to cheap energy usually five times cheaper than standard prices.

Big institutions that mine cryptocurrency install thousands of machines packed like a can of sardines into cavernous warehouses.

In 2015, a documentary detailed a large-scale foreign mining operation with an electricity outlay of $100,000 per month creating 4,000 bitcoins. These are popping up all over the world.

An additional white paper from a Cambridge University study uncovered that 58% of bitcoin mining comes from China.

Cheap power equals dirty power. Chinese mining outfits have bet the ranch on low-cost coal and hydroelectric generators. The carbon footprint measured at one mine per day emitted carbon dioxide at the same rate as five Boeing 747 planes.

The Chinese mining ban in January set off a domino effect with the Chinese mining operations relocating to mainly Canada, Iceland, and the United States.

Effectively, China has just exported a tidal wave of new pollution and carbon emissions.

Bitcoin is mined every second of every day and currently has a supply of approximately 17 million today, up from 11 million in 2013.

Bitcoin's electricity consumption has been elevated compared to alternative digital payment currencies because the dollar price of bitcoin is directly proportional to the amount of electricity that can profitably be used to mine it.

To add more granularity, miners buy more servers to maintain profitability then upgrade to more powerful servers. However, the new calculating power simply boosted the solution complexity even faster.

Mines are practically outdated upon launch, and profitability could only occur by massively scaling up.

Consumer grade personal computers are useless now because the math problems are so advanced and complicated.

Specialized hardware called Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) is required. These mining machines are massive, hot, and guzzle electricity.

Bitcoin disciples would counter, describing the finite number of bitcoins - 21 million. This was part of the groundwork laid down by Satoshi Nakamoto (a pseudonym), the anonymous creator of bitcoin, when he (or they) constructed the digital form of money.

Nakamoto could not have predicted his digital experiment backfiring in his face.

The bottom line is most people use bitcoins to literally create money out of thin air in digital form, rather than using it as a monetary instrument to purchase a good or service.

That is why people mine cryptocurrency, period.

Now, excuse me while I go into the weeds for a moment.

Enter hard fork.

A finite 21 million coins is a misnomer.

A hard fork is a way for developers to alter bitcoin's software code. Once bitcoin reaches a certain block height, miners switch from bitcoin's core software to the fork's version. Miners begin mining the new currency's blocks after the bifurcation, creating a new chain entirely and a brand spanking new currency.

Theoretically, bitcoin could hard fork into infinite new machinations, and that is exactly what is happening.

Bitcoin Cash was the inaugural hard fork derived from the bitcoin's blockchain, followed by Bitcoin Gold and Bitcoin Diamond.

Recently, the market of hard fork derivations includes Super Bitcoin, Lightning Bitcoin, Bitcoin God, Bitcoin Uranium, Bitcoin Cash Plus, Bitcoin Silver, and Bitcoin Atom.

All will be mined.

The hard fork phenomenon could generate millions of upstart cryptocurrency server farms universally planning to infuse market share because new currencies will be forced to build up a fresh supply of coins.

If Peter Thiel's prognostication of a 20% to 50% chance of bitcoin's price rising in the future is true, it could set off a cryptocurrency server farm mania.

By the way, Thiel also believes that there is a 30% chance that Bitcoin could go to zero.

A surge in price of bitcoin results in mining cryptocurrency operations everywhere by any type of electricity, especially if the surge maintains price stability. Even mining in Denmark, where one finds the world's costliest electricity at $14,275 per bitcoin, would make sense.

Recently, miners' appetite for power is causing local governments to implement surcharges for extra infrastructure and moratoriums on new mines. Even these mines built adjacent to hydro projects are crimping the supply lines, and consumers are forced to buy power from outside suppliers. Miners are often required to pay utility bills months in advance.

By July 2019, mining will possibly need more electricity than the entire United States consumes. And by February 2020, bitcoin mining will need as much electricity as the entire world does today, according to Grist, an environmental news website.

Geographically, most locations around the world were profitable based on May's bitcoin price of $10,000.

However, the sudden slide down to $6,556.55 reaffirms why the Mad Hedge Technology Letter avoids this asset class like the plague.

The most unrealistic operational locations are distant, tropical islands, such as the Cook Islands at $15,861, to mine one bitcoin.

If you'd like to drop your life and make a fortune mining bitcoin, then Venezuela is the most lucrative at $531 per bitcoin.

As bitcoin's nosedive perpetuates, Venezuela might be the last place on earth with mining farms.

Who doesn't like free money? Set up a few devices, crank up the power, collect the coins, pay off the electricity bill, pocket the difference and hopefully the world - or Venezuela - hasn't keeled over by then.

 

 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Quote of the Day

"If privacy is outlawed, only outlaws will have privacy," - said Philip R. "Phil" Zimmermann, Jr., creator of the most widely used email encryption software in the world.

 

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-07-09 01:05:372018-07-09 01:05:37How Environmentalists May Kill Off Bitcoin
MHFTR

July 6, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
July 6, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(HOW THE COBALT SHORTAGE WILL LEAD TO THE $2,000 IPHONE),
(AAPL), (SSNLF), (CMCLF), (FCX), (VALE), (GLNCY), (VLKAY), (BMWYY)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-07-06 01:06:532018-07-06 01:06:53July 6, 2018
MHFTR

How the Cobalt Shortage Will Lead to the $2,000 iPhone

Tech Letter

Hello $2,000 iPhone.

Flabbergasted consumers reacted last holiday season when Apple dared offer a $1,000 smartphone.

How confident this company has become!

Well, this is just the beginning.

Apple (AAPL) will be the first smartphone maker to offer a $2,000 phone, and I will tell you why!

The tech industry is going through a cumbersome wave of repricing after several high-profile debacles underscoring the true value of data.

The upward revision of data has seen more players pour into the game attempting to carve out a slice of the pie for themselves.

The reason why tech companies will start offering products at higher price points is because the inputs are rising at a rapid clip.

Apple's Development and Operations (DevOps) costs to design and maintain this outstanding product is going through the roof.

Apple's DevOps employees earn around $145,000 (before tax) per year and compensation is rising. Granted, the technology is developing and batteries are smaller, but salaries are rising at a quicker relative pace because of the dire shortage of DevOps talent in Silicon Valley.

It's possible that living in a shoebox at $4,200 per month in Mountain View, Calif., is off-putting for potential staff.

The most expensive part of an iPhone X is the OLED screen.

Apple estimated costs of $120 per screen manufacturing the Apple iPhone X. The cost doubled from LCD panels from $60 per screen.

Samsung (SSNLF) has been best of breed for screens for a while, and it is currently working on the next generation of Micro LED tech, which is the next gap up from the OLED displays of today.

Samsung has an inherent conflict of interest with Apple, creating tension between these tech stalwarts. Apple made the contentious decision to procure in-house screens at a secret manufacturing facility in Santa Clara, Calif., to avoid the constant friction.

It's common knowledge that the average price of technology shrinks over time, but the American smartphone industry has defied gravity with expected prices rising 6% to $324 in 2018.

The Apple iPhone X raw costs were around $400 per phone. There is zero chance that a next gen, enhanced Apple smartphone will cost this low ever again.

Confirming this trend are Chinese smartphones retail prices rising at 15% last year.

The cost of memory, DRAM and NAND chips, rose dramatically this past year too. As more memory is crowbarred into the design process, the costs keep trending higher.

Lithium-ion batteries only add up to 1% to 2% of OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturers) cost and probably only bumps up the cost of iPhones incrementally.

The more skittish situation is the EV (Electric Vehicles) snafu spiking total demand.

Volkswagen (VLKAY) announced its most wide-ranging electrification plans ever.

In order to achieve this lofty objective, Volkswagen has earmarked $25 billion for batteries from Samsung, LG, and Contemporary Amperex.

All told, the final investment in batteries will amount to $70 billion and another $25 billion in capital investment.

Volkswagen hopes to have 16 up and running (EV) factories by 2022, up from three today.

All told, this company will bring 80 new EV models to market by 2025.

The goal is unattainable because of a lack of in-house battery production.

CEO Matthias Muller said the reason for not manufacturing in-house batteries was, "Others can do it better than we can."

Muller will rue the decision down the line as a myriad of companies migrate toward in-house solutions, giving firms more control over the process and overhead.

More importantly, Muller will have to rely on the ebb and flow of rising cobalt prices.

A battery for an (EV) ranges between $8,000 to $20,000, comprising the largest input for the (EV) makers such as Tesla (TSLA) and Ford (F).

Making matters worse, companies cut from all cloth are hoarding cobalt reserves based on anticipating the potential demand.

This phenomenon will cause all big tech players to replenish any reserves of base materials immediately.

Apple has had chip shortage problems in the past. This year is even worse than 2017, with NAND and DRAM chip supply trailing demand by 30%.

Tech companies have been hastily locking down contracts in advance to ensure the necessary materials to produce their flashy gadgets on a highly pressurized deadline.

Lithium battery demand is expected to rise 45% between 2017 and 2020, and there has been no meaningful large-scale investment into this industry.

Battery production made up 51% of cobalt demand in 2016 and will hit around 62% by 2022.

Compounding the complexity is 60% of global cobalt production is found in one country - the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).

DRC is a hotspot for geopolitical fallout and its history is littered with civil war, internal conflict, and poor infrastructure.

The 21st century will be dependent on a chosen group of valuable materials. Cobalt is shaping up to be the leader of this pack and is needed in a plethora of business applications such as EVs, lithium-ion batteries, and PCs.

Cobalt is vital in metallurgical applications that include aerospace rotating parts, military and defense, thermal sprays, prosthetics, and much more.

The DRC recently proposed a revised mining law increasing taxes on cobalt and other precious metals. The legislation has yet to be written into stone and would certainly jack up the price of cobalt.

Everybody wants a cut of the cobalt game.

Glencore's (GLNCY) management has noted this mining tax is "challenging" at a time it is just completing its Katanga expansion.

Katanga has the potential to become the largest global copper and cobalt producer.

Copper is equally important to cobalt since cobalt production is a by-product of copper and nickel mining. Only 2% of cobalt results directly from cobalt mining, and 60% via copper mining, and 38% via nickel mining.

Last year, Freeport-McMoRan (FCX) was dangling its cobalt project to outside investors in the DRC but was unable to fetch a premium price.

In a blink of an eye, China Molybdenum Co. (CMCLF) swooped in and (FCX) accepted an offer of $2.65 billion. (FXC) used the sale to pay down debt while the price of cobalt has taken off to the moon.

It gets worse. China owns 80% of refined global cobalt production and 90% of its operations are in the DRC.

China is attempting to corner the cobalt market in the DRC, gaining a stranglehold on future technological devices, (EV)s, and big data.

The keys to future technological hegemony lie in the sparsely inhabited jungles of the DRC. China has the first mover advantage and backing of the communist party as (CMCLF) strives to be a global dominator in cobalt production.

China has smartly wriggled its way down to the bottom of the supply chain capturing cobalt resources. If a trade war ensues, China can simply cut off cobalt supply lines to whomever.

There is nothing CFIUS or Donald Trump can do about it.

America's 14% of global cobalt production will be insufficient to produce the new (EV)s, iPhone 11s, gizmos and gadgets that American consumers have grown to embrace.

Analysts expected Apple to acquire some supplementary companies aiding in expansion following the overseas repatriation.

A thriving software outfit or a company of cloud developers would have sufficed. However, reports streaming in that Apple has entered into negotiations to buy a five-year supply of cobalt directly from miners for the first-time underscores where Apple's priorities lie.

Cobalt demand expects to increase by 30% from 2016 to 2020.

Apple is scared it will be locked out of the cobalt market or forced to pay ludicrous prices for its cobalt needs.

Considering the price of cobalt has quadrupled since June 2016, and smartphones are 25% of the cobalt market, it's a strategically prudent move by Apple's CEO Tim Cook in light of BMW (BMWYY) announcing the need of 10X more cobalt by 2025.

Going forward anything comprised of cobalt-based technology will garner a higher premium resulting in higher prices for consumers including that $2,000 iPhone.

(FCX) is a must buy for those who believe precious metals are the foundation to all future technology. Other intriguing names include Brazilian company Vale S.A. (VALE), and Glencore, the largest Swiss company by revenue.

Or if you have the cash, plunk it down on a cobalt mine in the DRC. But only if you're insane.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Quote of the Day

"Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible," - said Lord Kelvin, President of the Royal Society, in 1895.

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-07-06 01:05:522018-07-06 01:05:52How the Cobalt Shortage Will Lead to the $2,000 iPhone
MHFTR

July 5, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
July 5, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(THE HIGH COST OF DRIVING OUT OUR FOREIGN TECHNOLOGISTS),
(EA), (ADBE), (BABA), (BIDU), (FB), (GOOGL), (TWTR)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-07-05 01:06:212018-07-05 01:06:21July 5, 2018
Page 291 of 313«‹289290291292293›»

Legal Disclaimer

There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.

Copyright © 2025. Mad Hedge Fund Trader. All Rights Reserved. support@madhedgefundtrader.com
Scroll to top