• support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Member Login
Mad Hedge Fund Trader
  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Luncheons
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

Tech Funding Takes a Hit

Tech Letter

The famous bank for tech startups, Silicon Valley Bank, is creating a bit of chaos, triggering a large selloff in banking shares on Thursday.

Friday has been up and down, and the volatility has overflowed into today’s trading.

It won’t trigger a larger credit event, but shows investors the perils of mismanagement at an institution that was hailed as the lifeblood of small tech firms in California.

My bet is that boutique banks like Silicon Valley Bank (SIBV), exposed to startups that don’t make money, could get dragged into this risk-off move.

The big banks should be just fine, which is why this could present a nice buy-the-dip moment.

Silicon Valley Bank was founded in 1983 and over the decades became the habitual financial institution for startups.

Today, it’s a household name in Bay Area finance, deeply entrenched in tech companies’ networks and infrastructure.

The commotion about the company is more or less about a routine bank run as many cash burn heavy tech investors started to pull funds from SIBV to cover the losses of other tech companies.

The bank was too leveraged with other capital tied up in longer duration bonds and at the worst possible time, they had an insurmountable liquidity requirement which they are having trouble meeting.

Of course, tech investors don’t want to be the last investors withdrawing funds.

The bank is now looking at selling its carcass to bigger hitters that can easily save this bank.

The bank only needs $2 billion in capital to stay solvent, which is a drop in the bucket to the likes of bigger banks like JP Morgan or Bank of America.

SIVB disclosed a $1.8 billion loss showing the treacherous nature of being the famous lender to tech startups in Silicon Valley at a time when this type of business is doing poorly.

Rising interest rates have left banks laden with low-interest bonds that can’t be sold in a hurry without losses. So if too many customers tap their deposits at once, it risks a vicious cycle.

A key takeaway from growth tech stocks is to avoid buying and holding for the time being because in the light of possible contagion to the subsector, the weakest of the names get hit the hardest. Any position should be a quick in and out, taking profits before positions sway violently the other way.

This also highlights the ongoing problems in the start-up scene, with tech ideas not getting funded because the debt markets aren’t offering the same type of incentive they used to.

Leverage can be good or bad and in this case, when assets aren’t matched on par with liabilities, these types of credit events or liquidation occurrences happen especially amid the negative backdrop we find ourselves in.

Remember that crypto bank Silvergate (SI) just liquidated after a roaring contagion in the crypto sector.

SI customers pulled their money in the panic that followed the 2022 collapse of the cryptocurrency exchange FTX. Silvergate said in January that it had realized losses of $886 million from selling securities as deposits fell.

This also validates my thesis that we are squarely in a trader's market with volatility working for and against traders and their trades.

The time of buy and hold with a vanilla tech ETF with the traditional tech titans is long gone, and if this isn’t a wake-up call then I don’t know what is.

Right now counting on my expertise as a trader is a must if you plan to survive these hostile and unpredictable markets.

On the bright side, this could offer a timely entry point into some other more solid tech names as I don’t believe this contagion will spread to the heavyweight tech stocks.

 

tech funding

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2023-03-10 16:02:542023-03-29 19:13:02Tech Funding Takes a Hit
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

Quote of the Day - March 10, 2023

Tech Letter

“When I was in college, I wanted to be involved in things that would change the world. Now I am.” – Said Founder of Tesla Elon Musk

 

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/warren-buffet.png 540 450 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2023-03-10 16:00:132023-03-10 17:46:40Quote of the Day - March 10, 2023
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

March 8, 2023

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
March 8, 2023
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(WHAT'S UP WITH RIVIAN)
(TSLA), (RIVN)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2023-03-08 17:04:422023-03-09 08:01:08March 8, 2023
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

What's Up With Rivian

Tech Letter

With the US 10-year Treasury yield sitting today at around 4%, there simply isn’t a rapacious appetite to invest in unproven EV stocks.

This is how the cookie crumbles when lending terms are tight.

The 4% yield today is about 8X higher than it was in July 2020 when the 10-year yielded half of a percentage point.

Funding and borrowing billions for tech startups is part and parcel of developing a new tech company.

However, the incremental interest payments from the extra 8X yield are exorbitant enough for investors to refrain from pulling out their wallets.

A lot of investor roadshow presentations are now getting shelved permanently.

It has to be a slam dunk otherwise venture capitalists are pouring their capital down a black hole which is essentially why the venture capitalist movement is frozen.

So we must turn a suspicious eye when unproven EV company Rivian announces a plan to sell $1.3 billion in bonds to shore up capital.

It couldn’t have come at a worse time as debt markets are expensive to tap with rates surging.

I suspect the yield on this debt to be anywhere from 11-15%.

Even more laughable, they labeled this return to the capital markets as the “green” debt offering.

Rivian says it intends to sell $1.3 billion worth of “green” convertible senior notes due in 2029, with the option to grant an additional $200 million worth of convertible notes to the original purchasers.

Rivian explained to us that it intends to use the capital it raises for “green” or environmental purposes. I believe these statements are a sign that upper management is becoming too woke.

RIVN just needs to stay in their lane and make damn good EVs, and by that, I mean better than Tesla, and not tell everyone how “green” they are. Nobody cares about their greenwashing.

EV makers are also big polluters and many studies show that they accrue a bigger carbon footprint than the production of combustible engine cars.

Of course, the EV makers sponsored research that says the complete opposite and I believe the truth lies somewhere in the middle.

Lithium mining is a source of pollution and can have negative environmental impacts. Used of damaged Lithium Ion batteries pollute as well.

Rivian said these projects could include activities tied to clean transportation, renewable energy, circular economy (i.e., recycling batteries/metals), energy efficiency, and pollution prevention.

Is this just a ruse to mask investors from its adjusted EBITDA loss of $5.22 billion in 2022?

Hard to say, yet I do know it is convenient to leverage its “green” image to wash the losses from their backs to get more time to figure out how to make the numbers work.

The company is forecasting another adjusted EBITDA loss of $4.3 billion for 2023 and that’s the real reason they need to tap the debt markets.

This EV maker is a cash-burn machine, and looking for someone to be the sugar daddy.  

This is all happening while Rivian is developing its next factory in Georgia, where its next-generation R2 vehicles will be built. Rivian says production of that vehicle will start in 2026.

Ultimately, this company does make a good product, and reviews of the EV have been positive, but the management is doing a poor job with the financials.

They might run out of money before the Georgian factory is finished and I believe desperately seeking funding at the worst time in history has to do more with shoddy management and botched accounting.

In short, the stock has gone from $130 to $15 today and much of the negative news has been discounted into the price.

It’s been a constant sell-the-rally stock for quite some time, but I think that will finally reverse itself when RIVN gets into single digits and from that point, it has a good chance to bounce to $20 per share.

Long term, I would stay away for now until we get some confirmation of their balance sheet improving. Tech companies with woefully mismanaged balance sheets aren’t the place to hide right now because tech stocks are too volatile.

 

ev companies

 

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2023-03-08 17:02:432023-03-28 16:16:57What's Up With Rivian
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

March 6, 2023

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
March 6, 2023
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(DEALING WITH A BLACK BOX)
(TSLA), (UBER), (LYFT)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2023-03-06 16:04:452023-03-06 22:23:20March 6, 2023
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

Dealing With a Black Box

Tech Letter

Who is responsible when artificial intelligence harms someone?

The California jury may soon have to make a decision. In December 2019, a man driving a Tesla (TSLA) with an AI navigation system killed two people in an accident. The driver faces up to 12 years in prison.

These events were bound to happen as teething pains are quite common with new technology especially one that is ambitious enough to transport machines in a human world.

Multiple federal agencies are investigating Tesla crashes, and The California Department of Motor Vehicles is investigating the use of AI-controlled driving functions.

Our current liability system, used to determine liability and compensation for injuries, is not AI-friendly.

Liability rules were designed for a time when humans caused most injuries.

But with AI, errors can occur without direct human intervention. The liability system must be adjusted accordingly. Poor accountability won't just stifle AI innovation. It will also harm patients and consumers.

It's time to start thinking about accountability as AI becomes ubiquitous but remains under-regulated. AI-based systems have already contributed to injuries.

The right accountability approach is critical to unlocking the potential of AI. Uncertain regulations and the prospect of costly litigation will deter investment, development, and deployment of AI in industries ranging from healthcare to autonomous vehicles.

Currently, liability claims typically begin and end with the person using the algorithm. Of course, if someone abuses the AI system or ignores its warnings, that person should be held accountable.

But AI errors are often not the user's fault. Who can blame an emergency doctor for letting an AI algorithm miss papilledema — a swelling of part of the retina?

AI's failure to detect the disease could delay care and potentially cause the patient to lose their eyesight. Papilledema is difficult to diagnose without an ophthalmologist.

AI is constantly self-learning, which means it takes in information and looks for patterns in it. This is a "black box" that makes it difficult to understand which variables affect the outcome.

The key is to ensure that everyone involved - users, developers, and everyone else in the chain - has been vetted to keep AI safe and effective.

First, insurers should protect policyholders from AI injury litigation costs by testing and validating new AI algorithms before deploying them.

Car insurers have also been comparing and testing cars for years. An independent security system can provide AI stakeholders with a predictable system of accountability that adapts to new technologies and practices.

Second, some AI errors should be challenged in courts that specialize in uncommon cases. These tribunals may specialize in particular technologies or topics.

Third, proper regulatory standards from federal agencies can offset the excessive liability of developers and users. For example, some forms of medical device liability have been superseded by federal regulations and laws. Regulators should focus on standard AI development processes early on.

Regulation can make or break AI in the upcoming years and I definitely lean towards the laissez faire attitude of deregulation.

Too many regulations will stifle the development and bring about undue costs.

No company will continue with loss-making operations unless they see a light at the end of the tunnel.

If allowed to develop with light regulation, AI will be that supercharger to tech stocks that investors dreamed of.

Transportation-based tech stocks such as Uber and Lyft will be one of the largest winners from the widespread implementation of driverless technology.

Also, throw in there the food delivery companies like DoorDash (DASH).

Another group with immense expense-saving possibilities is all the airlines around the world because theoretically, self-driving technology will become good enough to deploy in short and long-haul flights.

Getting to the point of consumers and regulators fully trusting self-driving technology is still a long and windy path, but I do believe we will arrive there.

When we do get there, the tech companies exposed to these great benefits will feel a 10X boost to their share price.

 

 

ai liability

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2023-03-06 16:02:202023-03-28 15:01:56Dealing With a Black Box
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

March 3, 2023

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
March 3, 2023
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(THE PAPER REGULATOR IN WASHINGTON)
(FEDERAL STOCK BUYBACK TAX)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2023-03-03 15:04:342023-03-03 15:54:09March 3, 2023
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

The Paper Regulator in Washington

Tech Letter

It’s a misnomer that this proposed stock buyback tax has teeth.

It offers easy loopholes to make it largely ineffective.

If management is smart enough – it’ll be a 0.

This is more or less a slam dunk for tech firms.

The Federal government is already too cozy with big tech to actually do anything that harms them, otherwise they would have removed Section 230, the law that doesn’t make corporations liable for content posted on their platform, a long time ago.

In fact, I would argue that the stock buyback tax in its current form will be good for tech companies because it offers the veneer of regulation without actually regulating big tech.

I’m referring to the new 1% excise tax on share repurchases that went into effect on Jan. 1, 2023.

This tax has caused some concern in some corners of Wall Street, based on the notion that buybacks were the biggest tailwinds supporting the past decade’s bull market — and anything weakening that advantage could lead to lower valuations.

Even more anti-stock market is the possibility that Ukrainian Supporter Joe Biden wants to ratchet up and quadruple federal taxes on US buybacks to 4%.

It’s all bark and no bite for Biden as usual.

This proposal is considered dead on arrival in Congress so it is convenient to just throw it out there to sound like he’s actually regulating when this thing has no chance of passing into law.

Virtue signaling has been a popular behavioral trait for US politicians for quite some time now.

So what is the loophole?

Foundationally, the new excise tax — whether 1% or 4% — is applied to NET buybacks — the key word being NET.

These are repurchases in excess of how many shares the corporation may have issued.

As has been widely reported for years, the shares that many companies are buying back often are barely enough to compensate for the new shares they issue as part of their compensation to company executives and top talent.

As a result, net repurchases — on which the new tax will be levied — are extremely less than gross repurchases.

There is much irony in the excise tax’s application to net repurchases.

Close your eyes when talking about some tech companies like data company Palantir (PLTR) who issue new stock as if it is going out of fashion.

There is so much new gross stock issued at PLTR that the stock is constantly mired in single digits.

Much of the stock issuance in the past has been diverted to the founders and executive management like Alex Carp and Peter Thiel who use this financial engineering tactic as their personal piggy banks.

In fact, a buyback tax based on a low stock price will incentivize founders and upper management to issue loads of new stock to cash out since they will need a higher volume of nominal stock to achieve whatever nominal amount is desired.

This leads to a situation where the stock buyback tax for net repurchases will never be applicable and will effectively always be 0%.

It’s precisely when share repurchases equal share issuance that the tax would not apply and if there is ever a remote possibility of happening, I can easily see management issuing whatever amount of stock to make sure the stock buyback tax always stays at 0.

Yet, that’s not all, I believe the stock buyback tax will promote higher dividends.

Up until now, the tax code provided an incentive for firms to repurchase shares rather than pay dividends when they wanted to return cash to shareholders.

Tech firms could absolutely return to delivering higher dividends to shareholders if share buybacks become too politically toxic.

This would be good news because, dollar for dollar, a higher dividend yield has more bullish consequences than a higher buyback yield.

In a largely copycat industry where if one strategy works, all notable companies pile into the same trend, we could see a renaissance of increasing dividend yields in tech companies.

Tech employees are also interested in these developments because many possess stock options.

The value of these stock options is tied to the price of the stock and recently, many of these employees are upset that once their stock options vest, they are cashing out with only half the amount compared to the peak of the Nasdaq index in November 2021.

Tech continues to be the least regulated industry in the US and as tech investors, let’s hope it stays that way.

This stock buyback tax plan has more holes in it than a piece of Swiss cheese, which is why it has done nothing to slow down share repurchases in the first 3 months of 2023.

It’s just more of the Federal government being a paper regulator and not a real one.

 

stock buyback tax

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2023-03-03 15:02:172023-03-27 17:22:56The Paper Regulator in Washington
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

Quote of the Day - March 3, 2023

Tech Letter

“I think everybody understands how important the cloud is.” – Said CEO of Salesforce Marc Benioff

 

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/masayoshi-son-king-of-debt-e1677704240623.png 191 350 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2023-03-03 15:00:482023-03-03 15:54:53Quote of the Day - March 3, 2023
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

March 1, 2023

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
March 1, 2023
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(THE VISION FUND LACKING VISION)
(WE), (SOFTBANK), (VISION FUND)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2023-03-01 15:04:222023-03-01 16:47:23March 1, 2023
Page 83 of 312«‹8182838485›»

Legal Disclaimer

There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.

Copyright © 2025. Mad Hedge Fund Trader. All Rights Reserved. support@madhedgefundtrader.com
Scroll to top