Mad Hedge Technology Letter
September 22, 2022
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(POTENTIAL TECH REVERSAL PUSHED BACK)
(FED), (META), (AAPL)
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
September 22, 2022
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(POTENTIAL TECH REVERSAL PUSHED BACK)
(FED), (META), (AAPL)
Tech investors want nothing to do with an aggressive Federal Reserve, but that’s what we have.
I don’t choose this and neither do many others out there.
We have been spoilt in a world with low inflation, global peace, low energy, and high liquidity which was the perfect scenario for tech stocks.
The reverse has happened almost overnight and now it’s that much harder to earn your crust of bread in the tech world.
Gone are the days of buying Facebook for peanuts then going for a sauna and a nap. It’s not that easy right now.
Tech stocks don’t go up in a straight line anymore – there will be many zigs and zags along the way moving forward.
Tech stocks aren’t immune to these exogenous stocks and as anointed growth companies, they inherently need to borrow capital and grow more than the cost of it.
That endeavor is stretched to the limit as bond yield explodes to the upside with this latest rate rise.
Raising interest rates by 0.75% for the third consecutive time this afternoon was the consensus, but in fact, there was a 25% chance of a full 1% rate rise. We avoided that bullet.
Tech stock doves were hoping US Federal Reserve Governor Jerome Powell would save them, by initiating a pivot to save the stock market, but no do this time around.
It underscores that Powell is adamant about continuing this inflation battle even if I do believe it’s too little too late.
The central bank’s new benchmark borrowing rate is now between 3.0% to 3.25%, up from the current range of 2.25% to 2.5%. This would bring the fed funds rate to its highest level since 2008.
Tech stock reacts most sensitively to the change in Fed Funds rates which is why we have seen CEO and Founder of Meta (META) or Facebook Mark Zuckerberg lose $71 billion of his net wealth this year.
Not only is the macroenvironment squarely against him, but his flagship product Facebook is losing steam, and his new product the Metaverse has garnered tepid reviews from outsiders.
How long does the Fed intend to increase rates?
The updated consensus for the Fed Funds Rate shows it at 4-4.25% by the end of 2022, another hike to 4.25-4.5% at end of 2023, and one more cut in 2024 and two more in 2025.
The answer is quite a while longer.
In the meantime, this will initiate a “reverse wealth effect” and tech stocks are the biggest losers, and the US dollar is an unmitigated winner.
Delaying lower Fed Funds rates means delaying the reversal in tech stocks which need lower rates to explode higher and without it, they are quite ordinary.
Signaling higher rates for longer is designed to tame inflation, but there are so many unintended consequences for US tech stocks.
The most important themes to be concerned about are revenue and financing.
The .75% increase in rates will mean that tech stocks will produce lower annual revenue because financing costs will be higher.
This is already at a time when general costs have exploded higher such as an uncontrollable wage spiral, supply chain bottlenecks, health care costs, transportation costs, and energy costs.
It’s a great deal harder to keep the numbers down enough to profit which basically means gross margins will compress further from today.
Tech stocks will come back because they always do. They are the profit engine of corporate America, and that will never change.
I see great tech companies like Apple (AAPL) installing the framework so they can maximize on the next move up when the bull market reignites.
They are doing this by moving iPhone production to India and other tablet production to Vietnam to get out of lockdown China.
Now is the time to reset before tech bounces back and it’s painful to see tech get slaughtered, but this is a necessary evil after a wonderful bull run from 2012 to November 2021.
US FED GOVERNOR GIVES NO LOVE TO TECH STOCKS
Global Market Comments
September 21, 2022
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(EXPLORING THE WORLD OF EXTREME LEAPS),
(TSLA)
Mad Hedge Biotech and Healthcare Letter
September 20, 2022
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(A MONSTER BIOTECH ON ITS WAY TO ANOTHER BLOCKBUSTER)
(BMY), (AMGN), (VTYX)
This year's bear market has pushed a lot of businesses to their breaking points. The S&P 500, the benchmark of stock performance in the US, has fallen by 14.6% in 2022.
What’s making things look gloomier is that the tech-focused Nasdaq Composite Index, aka the bellwether growth stock index, has plummeted by 22% thus far. Even the Dow Jones Industrial Average, another leading indicator, has dipped by 11.5%. All these firmly place the entire market in the bear market territory.
In response to the headwinds, investors have spotlighted businesses with steady free cash flow, solid leadership teams, and virtually recession-proof sectors.
This is where Bristol Myers Squibb (BMY) shines as an excellent example of Wall Street’s reinvigorated desire to pour money on long-forgotten movers in the market.
As one of the leading biotechnology companies worldwide, BMY has once again piqued the interest of investors primarily for its ability to defy the bear market. In fact, the company’s stock is up 12% year to date, clearly outperforming the S&P 500 by roughly 29 percentage points.
BMY’s ascent has taken years, with the business benefitting massively from its $74 billion acquisition of another biotech stalwart, Celgene.
This deal granted BMY access to an extensive oncology and autoimmune diseases portfolio, with back-to-back blockbusters like Revlimid and Reblozyl sales practically paying for Celgene’s acquisition price.
Now, BMY has made another move that brought seismic rearrangement within the biopharma sector, particularly in the highly lucrative psoriasis treatments space.
Earlier this month, BMY disclosed that it received FDA approval for its oral plaque psoriasis treatment deucravacitinib. The company plans to market this new drug under the name Sotyktu.
More impressively, Sotyktu was not given any “black-boxed warning” on its label, which typically indicates that a treatment carries significant safety risks.
Unlike most therapies for psoriasis, which use Janus kinase inhibitors, BMY is the first to use and gain approval for a TYK2 inhibitor. Generally, treatments utilizing Janus kinase inhibitors come with “black-boxed warnings.”
The absence of which, in BMY’s candidate, indicates a cleaner label.
This is terrible news for Amgen’s (AMGN) Otezla, which is currently the leader in the psoriasis space. Since this drug uses Janus kinase inhibitors, it has become a “less safe” option for patients. More than that, Sotyktu managed to outperform Otezla in a head-to-head trial.
Aside from that, a “black-boxed warning” would have offered Amgen some defense in protecting Otezla’s market share.
Meanwhile, Sotyktu’s approval brings good news to smaller biotechnology companies, such as Ventyx Biosciences (VTYX), working on similar treatments that use TYK2 inhibitors.
Regarding costs, BMY’s list price for its psoriasis therapy is notably higher than Amgen’s. According to sources, Sotyktu will be given a price tag of roughly $75,000. In comparison, Otezla is priced at approximately $52,000 annually.
Needless to say, Sotyktu is projected to become another blockbuster in BMY’s arsenal. Simply basing the possibilities on Otezla’s recent sales reports would give us a good picture of this new drug’s future.
In 2021, Otezla raked in $2.2 billion in sales for Amgen. Despite the competition, Otezla is still projected to grow and reach $3.2 billion in annual sales by 2026.
Considering that BMY’s Sotyktu will be playing catch up in terms of marketing and distribution, this psoriasis drug is anticipated to reach $2 billion in yearly sales in 2026.
However, this was estimated before the FDA’s surprise approval. The consensus is that the absence of a “black-boxed warning” would significantly boost the projections.
Overall, BMY has always been quite the oddball among its peers. While the SPDR S&P Biotech ETF rose by a staggering 42% in 2021, the company was barely in positive territory.
Due to the impending patent cliffs at that time, BMY was considered a laggard in the biopharma world. Added to those concerns was the company’s move to buy Celgene for a jaw-dropping $74 billion, substantially increasing its debt-to-equity-ratio. Taken together, these threats made BMY an unfavorable investment from 2020 to late 2021.
By 2022, however, BMY will have transformed into a favorite on Wall Street. Investors have regarded it as a safe harbor amid the ongoing bear market.
Moreover, BMY shares have marched even higher thus far by an impressive 12.5%. Meanwhile, the SPDR S&P Biotech ETF has recorded a 21.4% loss this year.
While the rest of the market has been struggling to keep things afloat, BMY’s stock isn’t that far from hitting its 52-week high to date. Hence, it would be an excellent move to buy the dip.
Mad Hedge Bitcoin Letter
September 20, 2022
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE SAVIOR)
(BTC), (FTX), (SKYBRIDGE)
Enigmatic crypto investor Sam Bankman-Fried, founder of crypto exchange FTX, acquired a 30% stake in Anthony Scaramucci’s SkyBridge Capital, an alternative investment firm.
I believe this deal highlights the desperation the crypto industry currently faces.
I also don’t see the value in it.
Bankman-Fried is essentially the only prominent investor liquid enough to bank mediocre crypto infrastructure mostly because he has skin in the game and would potentially get shellacked with monstrous losses if crypto as an industry goes under.
Doing his best to prop up the mess is in his interests, otherwise, his brainchild FTX would suffer too.
As harrowing as this sounds, I don’t think crypto as an industry will go under, but the wounds get rawer by the day.
The deal was inked through SBF's venture-capital firm FTX Ventures and will support growth initiatives for SkyBridge.
SkyBridge will deploy the capital from FTX to buy $40 million in cryptocurrencies, which it will hold on its balance sheet.
SkyBridge investors are demanding redemptions from the fund ever since the price of Bitcoin has tanked causing anyone involved with the crypto industry a world of pain.
Many are anointing Bankman-Fried as the savior of crypto, but I would argue that this shows the inferiority of crypto as an industry.
It’s signaling that no other big names are coming to save crypto. No Marc Andreesen or anyone of that magnitude.
Crypto has shown it’s only viable when liquidity is in the process of loosening, and currently, the opposite is happening.
In fact, it appears as if liquidity will get even tighter heading into year-end.
And if that wasn’t bad enough, the integrity of the crypto industry has been under attack from all directions for quite some time.
Yet another explosive headline came out saying that a founder of a cryptocurrency investment research firm was accused by the SEC of promoting an initial coin offering without disclosing that he had been given incentives to do so.
Ian Balina, 33, promoted the SPRK token on social media platforms including YouTube and Telegram without revealing that he had been compensated by the company that offered it, the Securities and Exchange Commission said in a suit filed Monday in federal court in Austin, Texas.
It’s certainly a bad look that crypto is attracting such bad actors and the brand name downgrade just keeps getting clearer.
I believe crypto will weather this crypto winter but for the 10s of thousands of other crypto products, let’s call them collateral damage.
The next question is at what point does Bankman-Fried stop whipping his savior capital around and at what point does the crypto infrastructure get so bad there’s no way back?
Considering Bankman-Fried has wealth of around $24 billion, a $50-$70 million investment in some marginal crypto hedge fund is just a drop in the bucket for him.
SkyBridge doesn’t do that much, it just sells a crypto ETF, takes in fees for it, and markets it as a safer pair of hands to handle crypto for the investor. Investors can just go and buy crypto on Bankman-Fried’s FTX for a more direct way to invest in the same thing.
I do believe it’s worth it for Bankman-Fried to save these small companies now, to later unload them for a profit when Bitcoin recovers. He can afford the carry costs as he can pay in cash and avoid the high interest debt markets.
However, I do believe he will abstain from billion dollar purchases.
Even with him, there’s a limit.
As for the crypto infrastructure, just save one coin and that’s Bitcoin and the rest can go to hell. If this scenario takes place, crypto will survive and strengthen after the crypto winter ends.
Until then, it’s about survival for just about everyone in the crypto industry until the next crypto bull market initiates.
“I don’t want to fight old battles. I want to find new ones.” – Said Current CEO of Microsoft Satya Nadella
When John identifies a strategic exit point, he will send you an alert with specific trade information as to what security to sell, when to sell it, and at what price. Most often, it will be to TAKE PROFITS, but, on rare occasions, it will be to exercise a STOP LOSS at a predetermined price to adhere to strict risk management discipline. Read more
Global Market Comments
September 20, 2022
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(EXPLORING THE WORLD OF EXTREME LEAPS),
(TSLA)
Legal Disclaimer
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.