In the intricate maze of Alzheimer's disease (AD) research, many pharmaceutical pioneers have found themselves at dead ends. Over the past decades, the quest for groundbreaking AD treatments has seen numerous experimental drugs falter. Yet, against this backdrop, Biogen (BIIB) stands out, having secured approvals for two AD drugs within a span of just a few years.
Given this remarkable achievement, one might expect Biogen's shares to be soaring. Surprisingly, the company's stock performance has been underwhelming.
Biogen's first AD therapy, Aduhelm, received approval in mid-2021. Yet, its introduction to the market was not without challenges. The approval of Aduhelm was mired in controversy due to inconclusive data regarding its effectiveness, leading to hesitancy among many physicians. This raised eyebrows among investors, questioning the drug's potential return on investment.
However, the real game-changer lies in Biogen's second AD drug, Leqembi, which entered the market this year. Developed in partnership with Japan-based Eisai (ESAIY), the two companies will equally share the profits and losses.
For investors, this partnership signifies a shared risk and potential for significant returns. Analysts have varying estimates regarding Leqembi's sales potential, with some projecting revenues of $3 billion by 2028. Such projections can translate to substantial earnings per share, making it a focal point for stock market enthusiasts.
Forecasts suggest that the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) sector will witness a significant expansion, with an anticipated compound annual growth rate of 20.0%, escalating from $2.2 billion in 2020 to a staggering $13.7 billion by 2030 in the primary eight markets, namely, eight major markets the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, Japan, and urban China.
Considering the cautious approach after the Aduhelm situation, the market might be hesitant about making bold predictions for Leqembi. However, from an investment standpoint, Leqembi's financial trajectory appears promising. With a set annual list price and a growing patient base, the drug's revenue stream is poised for growth. For investors, this means a potential uptick in stock value and dividends in the coming years.
Diving deeper into Biogen's portfolio, the company's pipeline includes specific assets like BIIB080, an antisense oligonucleotide therapy targeting tau, a protein buildup in Alzheimer's patients' brains. There's also BIIB121 for Parkinson's Disease and BIIB124 for Essential Tremor. These assets, if approved, could open up new revenue streams, making Biogen's stock even more attractive.
Beyond its neuro portfolio, Biogen is diversifying its offerings. In August, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Zurzuvae, a medicine developed with Sage Therapeutics (SAGE) for postpartum depression (PPD). However, the FDA declined its use for major depressive disorder (MDD), a much larger market. Needless to say, this decision impacts the company’s potential revenue.
Further solidifying its position in the biotech market, Biogen is in the process of acquiring Reata Pharmaceuticals for $7.3 billion.
This acquisition brings Skyclarys, a treatment for Friedreich's ataxia, under Biogen's umbrella. Reports suggest that the market for drugs treating Friedreich's ataxia could surpass $2 billion annually by 2030.
So, what's the bottom line?
Biogen is proactively addressing its challenges, diversifying its portfolio, and showing potential for growth. While there are uncertainties, the company's strategic moves in the biotech space make it a contender for portfolio inclusion. For those with a keen eye on biotech stocks, the company offers both risks and rewards. Its recent approvals and acquisitions signal potential growth, but as with all investments, due diligence is crucial.
In the ever-evolving world of biotech investments, Biogen evidently stands as a company with potential. Its endeavors in Alzheimer's treatments, strategic partnerships, and acquisitions position it as a stock to watch. While challenges remain, the company's trajectory suggests a promising future, making it a consideration for investors seeking growth in the biotech sector. I suggest you buy the dip.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00april@madhedgefundtrader.comhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngapril@madhedgefundtrader.com2023-10-10 15:00:182023-10-10 15:57:50From Memory Lapses To Market Leaps
Come join me for lunch at the Mad Hedge Fund Trader’s Global Strategy Update, which I will be conducting in Kiev, Ukraine on Friday, October 13. An excellent meal will be followed by a wide-ranging discussion and an extended question-and-answer period.
I’ll be giving you my up-to-date view on stocks, bonds, currencies, commodities, precious metals, and real estate. And to keep you in suspense, I’ll be throwing a few surprises out there too. Tickets are available for $187.
I’ll be arriving on time and leaving late in case anyone wants to have a one-on-one discussion, or just sit around and chew the fat about the financial markets.
The lunch will be held at a major hotel in downtown Kiev. The precise location will be emailed with your purchase confirmation.
I look forward to meeting you and thank you for supporting my research.
To purchase tickets for this luncheon, please click here.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00april@madhedgefundtrader.comhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngapril@madhedgefundtrader.com2023-10-10 09:04:402023-10-24 09:12:35SOLD OUT - Friday, October 13 Kiev, Ukraine Global Strategy Luncheon
I am constantly on the lookout for ten baggers, stocks that have the potential to rise tenfold over the long term.
Look at the great long-term track records compiled by the most outstanding money managers, and they always have a handful of these that account for the bulk of their outperformance, or alpha, as it is known in the industry.
I’ve found another live one for you.
News came out last week that Elon Musk’s SpaceX has just landed a $70 million contract with the Department of Defense for the creation of its military Star Shield satellite network.
Elon Musk’s SpaceX is so forcefully pushing forward rocket technology that he is setting up one of the great investment opportunities of the century.
In the past decade, his start-up has accomplished more breakthroughs in advanced rocket technology than seen in the last 60 years, since the golden age of the Apollo space program.
As a result, we are now on the threshold of another great leap forward into space. Musk’s ultimate goal is to make mankind an “interplanetary species.”
There is only one catch.
SpaceX is not yet a public company, being owned by a handful of fortunate insiders and venture capital firms. But you should get a shot at the brass ring someday.
The rocket launch and satellite industry is the biggest business you have never heard of, accounting for $200 billion a year in sales globally. This is probably because there are no pure stock market plays.
Only two major companies are public, Boeing (BA) and Lockheed Martin (LMT), and their rocket businesses are overwhelmed by other aerospace lines.
The high value-added product here is satellite design and construction, with rocket launches completing the job.
Once dominated by the US, the market for launches has long since been ceded to foreign competitors. The business is now captured by Europe (the Arianne 5), and China (the Long March 5). Space business for Russia and itsAngara A5 rocket abruptly ended with its invasion of Ukraine.
Until recently, American rocket makers were unable to compete because decades of generous government contracts enabled costs to spiral wildly out of control.
Whenever I move from the private to the governmental sphere, I am always horrified by the gross indifference to costs. This is the world of the $10,000 coffee maker and the $20,000 toilet seat.
Until 2010, there was only a single US company building rockets, the United Launch Alliance (ULA), a joint venture of Boeing and Lockheed Martin. ULA builds the aging Delta IV and Atlas V rockets.
The vehicles are launched from Cape Canaveral, Florida and Vandenberg Air Force Base in California, both of which I had the privilege to witness. They look like huge Roman candles that just keep on going until they disappear into the blackness of space.
Enter SpaceX.
Extreme entrepreneur Elon Musk has shown a keen interest in space travel throughout his life. The sale of his interest in PayPal, his invention, to eBay (EBAY) in 2002 for $165 million, gave him the means to do something about it.
He then discovered Tom Mueller, a childhood rocket genius from remote Idaho who built the largest ever amateur liquid-fueled vehicle, with 13,000 pounds of thrust. Musk teamed up with Mueller to found SpaceX in 2002.
Two decades of grinding hard work, bold experimentation, and heart-rending testing ensued, made vastly more difficult by the 2008 Great Recession.
SpaceX’s Falcon 9 first flew in June 2010 and successfully orbited Earth. In December 2010, it launched the Dragon space capsule and recovered it at sea. It was the first private company ever to accomplish this feat.
Dragon successfully docked with the International Space Station (ISS) in May 2012. NASA has since provided $440 million to SpaceX for further Dragon development.
The result was the launch of the Dragon V2 (no doubt another historical reference) in May 2014, large enough to carry seven astronauts.
The largest SpaceX rocket now in testing has Mars capability, the 27-engine, 394-foot-high Starship, the largest rocket ever built.
Commit all these names to memory. You are going to hear a lot about them.
Musk’s spectacular success with SpaceX can be traced to several different innovations.
He has taken the Silicon Valley hyper-competitive ethos and financial model and applied it to the aerospace industry, the home of the bloated bureaucracy, the no-bid contract, and the agonizingly long time frame.
For example, his initial avionics budget for the early Falcon 1 rocket was $10,000 and was spent on off-the-shelf consumer electronics. It turns out that their quality had improved so much in recent years they met military standards.
But no one ever bothered to test them. $10,000 wouldn’t have covered the food at the design meetings at Boeing or Lockheed Martin, which would have stretched over the years.
Similarly, Musk sent out the specs for a third-party valve actuator no more complicated than a garage door opener, and a $120,000, one-year bid came back. He ended up building it in-house for $3,000. Musk now tries to build as many parts in-house as possible, giving it additional design and competitive advantages.
This tightwad, full speed ahead and damn the torpedoes philosophy overrides every part that goes into SpaceX rockets.
Amazingly, the company is using 3D printers to make rocket parts, instead of having each one custom-made.
Machines guided by computers carve rocket engines out of a single block of Inconel nickel-chromium super alloy, foregoing the need for conventional welding, a frequent cause of engine failures.
SpaceX is using every launch to simultaneously test dozens of new parts on every flight, a huge cost saver that involves extra risks that NASA would never take. It also uses parts that are interchangeable for all its rocket types, another substantial cost saver.
SpaceX has effectively combined three nine-engine Falcon 9 rockets to create the 27-engine Falcon Heavy, the world’s largest operational rocket. It has a load capacity of a staggering 53 metric tons, the same as a fully loaded Boeing 737 can carry. It has half the thrust of the gargantuan Saturn V moon rocket that last flew in 1973.
Musk is able to capture synergies among his three companies not available to any competitor. SpaceX gets the manufacturing efficiencies of a mass-production carmaker.
Tesla Motors has access to the futuristic space-age technology of a rocket maker. Solar City (SCTY) provides cheap solar energy to all of the above.
And herein lies the play.
As a result of all these efforts, SpaceX today can deliver what ULA does for 73% less money with vastly superior technology and capability. Specifically, its Falcon Heavy can deliver a 116,600-pound payload into low earth orbit for only $90 million, compared to the $380 million price tag for a ULA Delta IV 57, 156-pound launch.
In other words, SpaceX can deliver cargo to space for $772 a pound, compared to the $7,515 a pound UAL charges the US government. That’s a hell of a price advantage.
You would wonder when the free enterprise system is going to kick in and why SpaceX doesn’t already own this market.
But selling rockets is not the same as shifting iPhones, laptops, watches, or cars. There is a large overlap with the national defense of every country involved.
Many of the satellite launches are military in nature and top secret. As the cargoes are so valuable, costing tens of millions of dollars each, reliability and long track records are big issues.
Enter the wonderful world of Washington DC politics. UAL constructs its Delta IV rocket in Decatur, Alabama, the home state of Senator Richard Shelby, the powerful head of the Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs Committee.
The first Delta rocket was launched in 1960, and much of its original ancient designs persist in the modern variants. It is a major job creator in the state.
ULA has no rocket engine of its own. So it bought engines from Russia, complete with blueprints, hardly a reliable supplier. Magically, the engines have so far been exempted from the economic and trade sanctions enforced by the US against Russia for its invasion of Ukraine.
ULA has since signed a contract with Amazon’s Jeff Bezos-owned Blue Origin, which is also attempting to develop a private rocket business but is miles behind SpaceX.
Musk testified in front of Congress in 2014 about the viability of SpaceX rockets as a financially attractive, cost-saving option. His goal is to break the ULA monopoly and get the US government to buy American. You wouldn’t think this is such a tough job, but it is.
Elon became a US citizen in 2002 primarily to qualify for bidding on government rocket contracts, addressing national security concerns.
NASA did hold open bidding to build a space capsule to ferry astronauts to the International Space Station. Boeing won a $4.2 billion contract, while SpaceX received only $2.6 billion, despite superior technology and a lower price.
It is all part of a 50-year plan that Musk confidently outlined to me 25 years ago. So far, everything has played out as predicted.
The Holy Grail for the space industry has long been the building of reusable rockets, thought by many industry veterans to be impossible.
Imagine what the economics of the airline business would be if you threw away the airplane after every flight. It would cost $1 million for one person to fly from San Francisco to Los Angeles.
This is how the launch business has been conducted since the inception of the industry in the 1950s.
SpaceX is on the verge of accomplishing exactly that. It will do so by using its Super Draco engines and thrusters to land rockets at a platform at sea. Then you just reload the propellant and relaunch.
What's coming down the line? A SpaceX cargo business where you can ship high value products like semiconductors from Silicon Value to Australia in 30 minutes, or to Europe in 20 minutes.
Talk about disruptive innovation with a turbocharger!
The company has built its own spaceport in Brownsville, Texas that will be able to launch multiple rockets a day.
The Hawthorne, CA factory (where I charge my own Tesla S-1 when in LA) now has the capacity to build 160 rockets a year. This will eventually be ramped up to hundreds.
SpaceX is the only organization that offers a launch price list on its website (click here for that link), as much as Amazon sells its books. The Falcon 9 will carry 28,930 pounds of cargo into low earth orbit for only $60.2 million. Sounds like a bargain to me.
This no doubt includes an assortment of tax breaks, which Musk has proven adept at harvesting. Elon has been a quick learner of the ways of Washington.
Customers have included the Thai telecommunications firm, Rupert Murdock’s Sky News Japan, an Israeli telecommunications group, and the US Air Force.
So when do we mere mortals get to buy the stock? Analysts now estimate that SpaceX is worth up to $200 billion.
The current exponential growth in broadband and SpaceX’s Starlink will lead to a similar growth in satellite orders, and therefore rocket launches. So the commercial future of the company looks especially bright.
However, Musk is in no rush to go public. A permanent, viable, and sustainable colony on Mars has always been a fundamental goal of SpaceX. It would be a huge distraction for a publicly managed company. That makes it a tough sell to investors in the public markets.
You can well imagine that the next recession would bring cries from shareholders for cost-cutting that would put the Mars program at the top of any list of projects to go on the chopping block. So Musk prefers to wait until the Mars project is well established before entertaining an IPO.
Musk expects to launch a trip to Mars by 2027 and establish a colony that will eventually grow to 80,000. Tickets will be sold for $500,000. Click here for the details.
There are other considerations. Many employees and early venture capital investors wish to realize their gains and move on. Public ownership would also give the company extra ammunition for cutting through Washington red tape. These factors point to an IPO that is earlier than later.
On the other hand, Musk may not care. The last net worth estimate I saw for his net worth was $300 billion. If his many companies increase in value by ten times over the next decade, as I expect, that would increase his wealth to $3 trillion, making him the richest person in the world by miles.
If an IPO does come, investors should jump in with both boots. While the value of the firm may have already increased tenfold by then, there may be another tenfold gain to come. Get on the Elon Musk train before it leaves the station.
To describe Elon as a larger-than-life figure would be something of an understatement. Musk is the person on which the fictional playboy/industrialist/technology genius, Tony Stark in the Iron Man movies, has been based.
Musk has said he wishes to die on Mars, but not on impact. Perhaps it would be the ideal retirement for him, say around 2045 when he will be 75.
To visit the SpaceX website, please click here. It offers very cool videos of rocket launches and a discussion with Elon Musk on the need for a Mars mission.
Catching a Dragon by the Tail
This Could Be the Stock Performance
Is Mars the Next Hot Retirement Spot?
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Capsule-Re-entry-Parashutes-e1432763072757.jpg400264DougDhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngDougD2023-10-10 09:02:522023-10-10 19:45:23Will SpaceX Be Your Next Ten Bagger?
"The longer you wait to fire someone, the longer it has been since you should have fired them," said Elon Musk, founder and CEO of SpaceX and Tesla Motors.
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Fortune-Cooke-Youre-Fired-e1432762960406.jpg196300DougDhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngDougD2023-10-10 09:00:022023-10-10 19:43:56October 10, 2023 - Quote of the Day
Welcome to a new week in October.I believe October and November will be interesting months in the markets.
So, what do we have coming up this week?
Monday: Australia Consumer Confidence Chg.
Previous – 1.5%
Time: 7:30pm ET
Tuesday: US Consumer Inflation Exp.
Previous: 3.6%
Time: 11:00am ET
Wednesday: US PPI MoM.
Previous: 0.7%
Time: 8:30am ET
Thursday:US Core Inflation.
Previous:4.3%
Time: 8:30am ET
Friday:US Consumer Sentiment
Previous: 68.1
Time: 10:00am ET
THE MARKETS
S&P 500
In the past few weeks, sentiment has turned from bullish to bearish, and the market is entering a “seasonably favourable” period ahead.Friday’s strong employment number gave the market every chance to resume its decline but instead it strengthened. Therefore, there is opportunity for the bulls to regain control.Whilst holding last week’s 4,216 low, it may be possible to interpret the S&P as having commenced its 5th Elliott Wave advance onto new highs for the year (before a significant reversal occurs).The market has much to prove.
Important resistance levels include:4335, 4400/4430 & key 4510/4540.
GOLD
Gold recorded a bullish “outside reversal day” on Friday, to enable a recovery to now occur. Such a recovery can test the $1860-$1880 resistance area over coming days.However, unless gold can clear resistances at $1884 and then $1905, there is risk this potential bounce gives way to a deeper sell-off below $1804 support – toward the $1700 level in the weeks ahead.
CONFLICT IN THE MIDDLE EAST
Palestinian militants Hamas attacked Israel on the weekend.Oil prices jumped 4% following the surprise attack which is now in its third day.At dawn on Saturday during a major Jewish holiday, Palestinian militant group Hamas launched a multi-pronged infiltration into Israel – by land, sea and air using paragliders.The attack came hours after thousands of rockets were sent form Gaza into Israel.At least 700 Israelis have reportedly been killed according to NBC news.The Palestinian Health Ministry has recorded 313 deaths so far.The conflict sits at the doorstep of a key oil producing and export region for global consumers.Oil rich Iran looms large as the market’s immediate concern. Should the conflict escalate regionally, there could be quite a dramatic effect on the oil market with prices jumping back into the 90’s.
RECORDING OF JACQUIE’S POST MONTHLY ZOOM MEETING 09/27/23
Friday’s jobs report showed a strong resilient economy.
But people’s perception of their economic outlook is still gloomy.
Why?
Inflation, although slowly heading lower, is still far more than most people can tolerate.
Statistics and numbers in a book do not reflect what is being experienced in the real world.In other words, people’s experience doesn’t transition into less hardship because the numbers move down.
Numbers and reality are two different beasts.
A healthy jobs picture does not equate to a positive consumer sentiment.
All the extras we have become used to are being removed.It might appear subtle at first, but as you tally all findings together, it really becomes very clear.
Let’s see.Do you still get free drinks with children’s meals anymore?At some places, no.
The size of the product you buy at the grocer is smaller but has the same tagged price.That packet of laundry soap I buy is smaller as is the dishwashing liquid, but the price is the same.In Australia, a pound of butter went up a dollar a few weeks ago. Not 25 cents, not 50 cents, but a whole dollar.
The cost of housing has gone through the roof. In the aftermath of Covid, house prices surged, which pushed people out of the big cities into regional areas. The median home sales price has risen 27% since the end of 2019, and this makes home ownership particularly difficult for younger buyers such as millennials. And it’s not just house prices.
Higher interest rates are a problem too. 30-year fixed mortgages are running at an average 7.83% loan rate.Financial markets are a bit jumpy because of the possibility that the Fed could take rates even higher if inflation doesn’t pull back.
While the consumer price index may show inflation running at a 3.7% annual rate now, it’s about 20% higher than it was since early in the pandemic.
The CPI number for September will be released Wednesday.
Wishing you all a wonderful week.
Cheers
Jacquie
It doesn’t look like interest rates will be moving down in the short to medium term.We have had low rates for a very long time.In Australia, 2025 may be the earliest we could see a shift in rates.
Strap in because the financial stratosphere is welcoming a new star. OpenAI is skyrocketing, with whispers of a valuation floating between $80 billion and $90 billion.
Reports reveal chatter about a potential OpenAI share sale at this eyebrow-raising valuation. Why? It seems employees are eager to exchange their stock for some hard cash with external investors. And let's not forget, in yesteryears, venture firms have been known to sweep up OpenAI shares through tender offers.
Investor antennas are naturally tuning in to OpenAI's frequency. After all, if we break it down, an $80 billion to $90 billion valuation means investors would be shelling out $90 for each revenue dollar this year. This places the brain behind ChatGPT ahead of AI behemoths like Microsoft (MSFT), Alphabet (GOOGL), and Nvidia (NVDA), at least when dissecting specific metrics.
A brief spotlight on the AI arena: Microsoft and Alphabet are no strangers to the AI chessboard. Microsoft, which holds a 49% stake in OpenAI, and Alphabet, gearing up with its AI endeavor, Gemini, are both poised to make significant moves. Yet, OpenAI's speculated valuation seems to be running laps around them.
And then there's Nvidia. With AI fever at an all-time high, Nvidia's chips are in hot demand. Its stock has surged, reflecting investor excitement over its expected growth.
But here's the caveat: Start-ups often sport valuations that are disproportionate to their mature counterparts. They’re more about future potential than present profits.
So, if OpenAI's valuation indeed reaches the stratosphere, it's poised to rub shoulders with TikTok's parent, ByteDance, and Elon Musk's SpaceX. Yet, a full comparison becomes a tad challenging with private entities playing their financial cards close to their chests.
Naturally, the most pressing question is: What's next for OpenAI?
Well, it's still in its revenue infancy, having seen a significant influx post ChatGPT's November release. Evidently, an $80 billion to $90 billion valuation speaks volumes about the bullish sentiments surrounding AI, though. Actually, projections place the AI market at an awe-inspiring $407 billion by 2027, ascending from its already respectable $86.9 billion perch in 2022.
Dialing into the numbers, OpenAI projects are hitting the $1 billion revenue mark this year and teasing a meteoric rise into the multi-billions by 2024. Quite the leap! Their revenue engine? While ChatGPT plays the generosity card by being free in its basic form, advanced features come with a price tag. Moreover, corporations looking to harness OpenAI’s AI prowess for their products are signing checks with more zeros than we'd like to count.
But there’s more in OpenAI's innovation pipeline. A recent unveiling brought forth a ChatGPT iteration capable of voice interactions and visual engagements, making it a formidable contender to AI assistants such as Apple's (AAPL) Siri. This is an excellent move since 50% of U.S. mobile aficionados are now using voice search daily. It's clear: AI-driven voice assistants aren't just creeping into our routines; they're anchoring them.
Remember when ChatGPT also provided a backdoor to Bing? Although it was short-lived over concerns of paywall circumventions, it certainly added a feather to its cap. And speaking of accolades, ChatGPT enjoyed its moment in the sun as the fastest-growing consumer application.
At the time, ChatGPT didn’t just arrive; it made a statement. Boasting a user base of 1 million within merely five days of its debut speaks volumes about its acceptance rate. It was eventually dethroned by Meta's (META) Threads app. Still, that was quite the ride to the top for this upcoming company.
However, for retail investors hoping for a slice of the OpenAI pie, CEO Sam Altman might be throwing cold water on those hopes. His vision for the company doesn't seem to align with an immediate IPO or a sale — yet.
And while some might view the current AI market valuations as inflated bubbles reminiscent of the internet's early days, it's essential to remember: just as with the internet, we might be underestimating AI. As OpenAI's valuation catapults and its technological advancements carve out new niches, we're reminded of the uncharted potential that AI holds. The meteoric rise of ChatGPT, the strategic moves within the AI ecosystem, and the relentless pace of innovation underscore a clear narrative: AI is not the future; it's the present.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00Douglas Davenporthttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngDouglas Davenport2023-10-09 16:14:172023-10-09 16:14:17ECLIPSING THE TITANS
When John identifies a strategic exit point, he will send you an alert with specific trade information as to what security to sell, when to sell it, and at what price. Most often, it will be to TAKE PROFITS, but, on rare occasions, it will be to exercise a STOP LOSS at a predetermined price to adhere to strict risk management discipline.Read more
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Alert-e1457452190575.jpg135150Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2023-10-09 15:30:332023-10-09 15:30:33Jacquie's Post Trade Alert - (OXY) October 9, 2023 - TAKE PROFITS - SELL
Hot wars play a central role in accelerating inflation and the world’s newest kinetic war in the Middle East could prove toxic to the Fed’s quest to quell high inflation.
First, condolences to the atrocities that have occurred in the past 72 hours, the damage to families, society, and communities are hurtful and long-lasting.
Conflict in the Middle East means higher energy prices because a higher risk premium will be attached to the cost of logistics and production.
The Middle East has some of the highest outputs of oil and natural gas in the world with supply from Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and Iran flooding the world with cheap energy.
What does that mean for technology stocks?
I can tell you nothing good.
Physical wars rotate demand to certain goods that will deliver the consumer the best outcomes and in this case food and shelter. Running a supermarket during the lockdowns was a small gold mine. That means there is a high chance that money rotates out of Google and Microsoft and goes into defense and military stocks like Raytheon and Lockheed Martin (LMT).
Unless products are critical to survival, goods like EVs and Tesla’s (TSLA) are placed on the backburner.
Few will have the money to charge their EVs with another wave of price increases coming down the pipeline. I already hear Norwegians complaining about the cost of fueling EVs after cheap Russian energy was shut off to them.
Forget about an iPhone upgrade cycle.
Kids will just have to deal with the iPhone 14 for longer.
High inflation plays a leading role in wars and conflicts. But that doesn’t mean that economic policy doesn’t matter anymore. Less wars result in bigger tailwinds to deflation.
China also owns the rare metals industry and policy might dictate to hold back supply and earmark it for national and military industries instead of selling to foreigners.
Tesla’s might not be able to be produced anymore because they can’t secure the right materials like cobalt from China.
If a full-fledged regional war intensifies, then the US economy is almost guaranteed to lock in 4% as the new CPI low for this inflationary cycle. The next move would be higher.
The US has already pledge financial and military aid to Israel and that bill will be footed by the US taxpayer.
If this war begins to get expensive and the US starts shipping off $200 billion every few months to the Middle East then this fiscal spending will bring forward more inflation.
Ultimately, if a third war in the shape of Taiwan rears its ugly head, we could experience high 20% inflation like we did in the 1970’s, but this time around, we would do it with close to $34 trillion in US federal debt and those onerous debt interest payments.
The technology sector better hope and pray for a quick resolution to the Middle East conflict in order to stave off the threat of destroying the Santa Claus rally in the Nasdaq.
A third concurrent war in Taiwan would mean instant recession, spiking bond yields, $150 per barrel oil, and technology stocks experiencing a wild pullback.
In the meantime, the newest stresses will guarantee the Eurozone plus UK into a deep recession because they aren’t self-sufficient.
It also adds even more stress to the US economy which is the last man standing at this point because US tech earnings are still in the green.
Certain stocks do very well in times of geopolitics, but these multinational globalized companies have a lot to sacrifice if the world goes pear-shaped.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00april@madhedgefundtrader.comhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngapril@madhedgefundtrader.com2023-10-09 15:02:102023-10-09 16:57:29Global War Threatens Tech Rally
Legal Disclaimer
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.