A consensus is emerging: more than 15 years after the iPhone's debut, generative AI services like ChatGPT may soon underpin a new breed of hardware device, heralding a distinct mode of human-computer interaction. This shift is dubbed the "iPhone moment" by tech enthusiasts, signaling a potential tectonic shift akin to the iPhone's impact on the tech landscape.
The generative AI sector is witnessing significant changes. Spearheaded by industry leaders like Google's Bard and OpenAI's ChatGPT, the landscape is evolving rapidly. Recent data reveals that the valuation of the generative AI sector is projected to skyrocket from $40 billion in 2022 to an impressive $1.3 trillion in the next decade.
This growth suggests an impressive Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 42%. Initially, this growth will be driven by training infrastructure. However, as the industry matures, the focus will shift towards applications in digital advertising, niche software, and services.
The increasing demand for generative AI solutions is a testament to technological advancements and hints at lucrative financial opportunities. The sector could generate an additional $280 billion in software revenue. This rise is expected to be driven by specialized AI assistants, cutting-edge infrastructure products, and AI co-pilots that streamline the coding process.
With the increasing shift toward the public cloud, tech giants like Amazon WebServices (AMZN), Microsoft (MSFT), Google (GOOGL), and Nvidia (NVDA) are well-positioned to capitalize on this trend.
By 2032, generative AI’s market share is predicted to expand significantly, impacting various sectors, from IT hardware to gaming.
Key revenue sources are anticipated to include generative AI infrastructure services, AI-powered digital advertising, and specialized AI software.
On the hardware side, AI-centric servers, storage solutions, computer vision AI tools, and voice-driven AI gadgets are expected to be the major contributors.
Notably, innovation is not limited to abstract concepts and projections. Tangible products reflecting this AI-driven vision are already making their mark.
At Meta Platform Inc. (META), CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently unveiled a new iteration of smart glasses crafted in partnership with Ray-Ban. Retailing at $299, these glasses are more than just a fashion statement. They're equipped with advanced features that enable users to livestream videos, make calls, and engage with AI assistants.
Imagine a world where our eyewear offers real-time translations and holographic interactions, painting a picture of a future where our eyewear does more than just correct vision.
Yet, the race to dominate the AI hardware market is fierce. OpenAI, the organization behind ChatGPT, is reportedly collaborating with LoveFrom, a design firm co-founded by ex-Apple (AAPL) designer Jony Ive.
Their mission is ambitious: to craft what some call "the iPhone of artificial intelligence,” a dedicated AI hardware device aiming for a design unconstrained by the traditional rectangular screen. Still shrouded in mystery, this venture has garnered interest from heavyweights like Softbank's Masayoshi Son, hinting at its potential scale.
Furthermore, the advancements aren’t restricted to established tech giants.
Startups are also making waves. Humane, co-founded by former Apple designer Imran Chaudhri, showcased a wearable "disappearing computer" at a recent TED conference. This innovative device offers features like language translation and dietary recommendations, embodying the vision of a future where technology seamlessly integrates into our daily lives.
The potential of AI is vast, and as we stand on the brink of this AI-driven era, hardware will play a pivotal role in AI's evolution. I predict 2024 will be a significant "launching pad" for AI.
However, while the allure of AI is undeniable, we must also consider the familiarity and ease of smartphones. AI features are continually being integrated into these devices, reinforcing their dominance in our lives. Advancements in technology have birthed innovations like fitness-tracking smartwatches, but we must also be cautious.
Personal AI devices, such as the ill-fated Google Glass, might face setbacks before gaining widespread acceptance. Still, the allure of AI's capabilities is undeniable, and carrying a phone around might soon feel like a relic of the past.
As the tech world stands on the cusp of this AI-driven era, one thing is clear: the race to discover the next "golden goose" of technology is well underway. Whether AI devices will soar to the heights of the iPhone remains to be seen, but their potential to reshape our interaction with technology is undeniable.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00Douglas Davenporthttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngDouglas Davenport2023-10-13 16:49:022023-10-13 16:49:02FROM TOUCHSCREENS TO THOUGHT STREAMS
Uber is an interesting tech stock that readers need to look at for the long haul.
Even though in today’s tech market, there are many exogenous events creating uncertainty, any big dip in Uber should be looked at as a cheaper price to buy into the stock.
From 2021 to 2022, Uber’s gross revenue went from $17 billion per year to $32 billion per year and that has really set the tone for the company.
The upward trajectory in revenue has cemented Uber as a stable company and has allowed it to shed the label of a speculative company.
Showing revenue stability has gone a long way in 2023.
The performance of the stock has superseded anybody’s wildest dreams.
Uber is solidly on its way to surpass its 2021 peak of $60 per share from the $44 per share today.
That’s not to say they won’t have some down periods along the way.
After an abysmal year for investors in 2022, when rising interest rates completely shut down interest in growth tech stocks, this year has brought some renewed optimism.
The transportation-as-a-service business is experiencing strong momentum right now following impressive financial results.
In the second quarter of 2023, Uber's revenue of $9.2 billion was 14% higher than in the year-ago period.
The business was finally able to register its first-ever operating profit, as this metric came in at $326 million for the quarter. And perhaps even more impressive, Uber produced a record $1.1 billion of free cash flow.
The bulls are optimistic as a result of these positive financial metrics, as the company appears to have reached a tipping point where profits will reoccur in the future.
CEO Dara Khosrowshahi has successfully found ways to cut costs.
Uber spent $8.9 billion in the most recent quarter on all of its costs and expenses which wasn’t a penny more than the same time last year.
Yet the sales base is much higher right now. That's an early sign that the business is scaling up in an efficient manner
Uber is a captivating investment because of just how essential it has become to the daily lives of millions of people.
It's hard to imagine what life was like before Uber existed, as its services are so entrenched around the world.
This superior customer value proposition gives me confidence that Uber isn't going away anytime soon and that maybe its importance will only expand over time.
In Q2, Uber had 137 million monthly active platform consumers (MAPCs), up 12% year over year, who spent $33.6 billion in gross booking value on the app and took 2.3 billion trips.
Plus, there were 6 million drivers and couriers who worked for the app in the three-month period. That goes to show you just how big this platform really is.
Uber also benefits from having an economic moat, which helps it fend off rivals like Lyft. As more riders join the platform, it becomes increasingly valuable to drivers.
Granted, we are in a tough trading time with almost daily reminders that the world is a volatile place. This does not help tech stocks grow and investors sometimes flee to fixed income.
If Uber does deliver investors a big dip, it would be a great chance to hop into some shares.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00april@madhedgefundtrader.comhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngapril@madhedgefundtrader.com2023-10-13 15:02:092023-10-13 15:17:51A Good Tech Stock For the Long Term
“Imagination is the limit. Go out there and create some magic.” - Said Elon Musk
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/elon.png636428april@madhedgefundtrader.comhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngapril@madhedgefundtrader.com2023-10-13 15:00:072023-10-13 15:22:05October 13, 2023 - Quote of the Day
(A WARMING CLIMATE IS BAD NEWS FOR THE CACAO TREE)
October 13, 2023
Hello everyone,
Does your morning routine involve a cup of coffee?
Well, be prepared. The warming climate will impact the price of those coffee beans you purchase. And ponder this - a dwindling production of chocolate may well be part of your future.
El Nino and climate change are bad news for coffee crops, which are highly sensitive to weather changes. Hotter temperatures and shifts in rainfall patterns can also damage cocoa pod development and promote the spread of pests and diseases.
The latest El Nino Southern Oscillation outlook does not look good.El Nino is expected to last from January to March 2024, with a 71% chance that it will intensify from November to January.
The knock-on effect of this is that greatly intensified and frequent El Nino could well reduce the amount of arable land for cocoa cultivation. The climate factor not only poses a threat to food security but also endangers the livelihoods of farmers.West African countries are particularly at risk from extreme weather changes.
Jonathan Haines, who is the research director at Gro Intelligence, points out that El Nino conditions “are often historically associated with drier conditions in West Africa where three-quarters of the world’s cocoa is produced.”
Africa accounts for 75% of global cocoa production, while the Americas, which includes Brazil and Ecuador, account for only 20%.Asia-Pacific produces the remaining 5% with Indonesia and Papua New Guinea being the largest producers in the region.
Cocoa comes from the seed of the cacao tree and is an essential ingredient for chocolates. But cocoa butter, which is a by-product of cocoa processing, is also widely used in the pharmaceutical industry for skincare products and cosmetics.
The financial damage of climate change will be costly for this soft commodity, since top cocoa producers like Ivory Coast, Ghana, and Indonesia, are vulnerable to extreme weather conditions.As profits from cocoa make up 70% to 100% of Ghanaian cocoa producers’ income, any decline in yields will have a substantial impact on their livelihoods.Climate change is also wreaking havoc in Indonesia where it is reducing productivity by 50%, leading to an estimated loss of $666 per hectare, affecting up to one million hectares.
Cocoa prices have already jumped significantly to “high premiums” according to the International Cocoa Organisation.
At the end of August, ICCO’s latest data showed that cocoa futures settled at $3,730 per tonne in London, and $3,633 per tonne in New York.That amounts to a 78% rise from $2,095 per tonne in London a year ago and a nearly 50% year-on-year rise from $2,427 per tonne in New York.
Prices of cocoa are at their highest in 50 years, according to a Reuters report.
Agricultural adaptation and mitigation efforts are some ways that farmers can tackle specific climate threats, but they are costly.
Private sector capital and non-profit initiatives can help alleviate the financial burden on cocoa farmers learning to adapt to climate change.The Rainforest Alliance, a non-governmental organisation, started the Restore project in Cote d’Ivoire and Ghana.The project has set aside $7 million to help 15,000 farmers manage 50,000 hectares of farmland and aims to expand tree cover in cocoa production landscapes across the two countries.
This year rain has helped ease the impact of drought to some extent in West African countries.The cacao tree thrives in humid rainforest-like conditions, relying on heavy rainfall close to the equator. But the threat of rising temperatures over the next three decades means a loss of moisture in the ground which scientists tell us will not be made up by rain. A temperature rise of just 2.1C over the next 30 years caused by global warming could spell an end for the chocolate industry worldwide, according to the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.In the face of climate change and changing weather patterns, ongoing adaptation efforts will be needed in agricultural land management if we are to maintain consistent production of soft commodities.
As you are all well aware, I have long been a history buff. I am particularly fond of studying the history of my own profession, trading, and investing in the hope that the past errors of others will provide insights into the future.
History doesn’t repeat itself, but it certainly rhymes.
So after decades of research on the topic, I thought I would provide you with a list of the eight worst trades in history. Some of these are subjective, some are judgment calls, but all are educational. And I do personally know many of the individuals involved.
Here they are for your edification in no particular order. You will notice a constantly recurring theme of hubris.
1) Ron Wayne’s sales of 10% of Apple (AAPL) for $800 in 1976
Say you owned 10% of Apple (AAPL) and you sold it for $800 in 1976. What would that stake be worth today? Try $270 billion. That is the harsh reality that Ron Wayne, 89, faces every morning when he wakes up, one of the three original founders of the consumer electronics giant and the world’s largest company.
Ron first met Steve Jobs when he was a spritely 21-year-old marketing guy at Atari, the inventor of the hugely successful “Pong” video arcade game.
Ron dumped his shares when he became convinced that Steve Jobs’ reckless spending was going to drive the nascent start-up into the ground and he wanted to protect his own assets in a future bankruptcy.
Co-founders Jobs and Steve Wozniak each kept their original 45% ownership. Today, Jobs’ widow, Laurene Powel Jobs, has a 0.5% ownership in Apple worth $4 billion, while the value of Woz’s share remains undisclosed but is thought to be a lot.
Today, Ron is living off of a meager monthly Social Security check in remote Pahrump, Nevada, about as far out in the middle of nowhere as you can get, where he can occasionally be seen playing the penny slots.
2) AOL’s 2001 Takeover of Time Warner
Seeking to gain dominance in the brave, new online world, Gerald Levin pushed old-line cable TV and magazine conglomerate, Time Warner, to pay $164 billion to buy upstart America Online in 2001. AOL CEO, Steve Case, became chairman of the new entity. Blinded by greed, Levin was lured by the prospect of 130 million big-spending new customers.
It was not to be.
The wheels fell off almost immediately. The promised synergies never materialized. The Dotcom Crash vaporized AOL’s business the second the ink was dry on the deal. Then came a big recession and the Second Gulf War. By 2002, the value of the firm’s shares cratered from $226 billion to $20 billion.
The shareholders got wiped out, including “Mouth of the South” Ted Turner. That year, the firm announced a $99 billion loss as the goodwill from the merger was written off, the largest such loss in corporate history. Time Warner finally spun off AOL in 2009, ending the agony.
Steve Case walked away with billions and is now an active venture capitalist. Gerald Levin left a pauper and is occasionally seen as a forlorn guest on talk shows. The deal is widely perceived to be the worst corporate merger in history.
Buy High, Sell Low?
3) Bank of America’s Purchase of Countrywide Savings in 2008
Bank of America’s CEO, Ken Lewis, thought he was getting the deal of the century, picking up aggressive subprime lender, Countrywide Savings, for a bargain $4.1 billion, a “rare opportunity.”
As a result, Countrywide CEO Angelo Mozilo pocketed several hundred million dollars. Then the financial system collapsed, and suddenly we learned about liar loans, zero money down, and robo-signing of loan documents.
Bank of America’s shares plunged by 95%, wiping out $500 billion in market capitalization. The deal saddled (BAC) with liability for Countrywide’s many sins, ultimately, paying out $40 billion in endless fines and settlements to aggrieved regulators and shareholders.
Ken Lewis was quickly put out to pasture, cashing in on an $83 million golden parachute, and is now working on his golf swing. Mozilo had to pay a number of out-of-court settlements but was able to retain a substantial fortune.
Mozilo passed away at a well-tanned 85 in 2023.
4) The 1973 Sale of All Star Wars Licensing and Merchandising Rights by 20th Century Fox
In 1973, my former neighbor, George Lucas, approached 20th Century Fox Studios with the idea for the blockbuster film, Star Wars. It was going to be his next film after his American Graffiti, which had been a big hit earlier that year.
While Lucas was set for a large raise for his directing services – from $150,000 for American Graffiti, to potentially $500,000 for Star Wars– he had a different twist ending in mind. Instead of asking for the full $500,000 directing fee, he offered a discount: $350,000 off in return for the unlimited rights to merchandising and any sequels.
Fox executives agreed, figuring that the rights were worthless, and fearing that the timing might not be right for a science fiction film. After all, who bought space toys in 1973?
In hindsight, their decision seems ridiculously short-sighted.
Since 1977, the Star Wars franchise has generated about $27 billion in revenue, leaving George Lucas with a net worth of over $5 billion by 2023. In 2012, Disney paid Lucas an additional $4 billion to buy the rights to the franchise.
The initial budget for Star Wars was a pittance at $8 million, a big sum for an unproven film.So saving $150,000 on production costs was no small matter, and Fox thought it was hedging its bets.
George once told me that he had a problem with depressed actors on the set while filming. Harrison Ford and Carrie Fisher thought the plot was stupid and the costumes silly.
Today, it is George Lucas that is laughing all the way to the bank.
$150,000 for What?
5) Lehman Brothers Entry Into the Bond Derivatives Market in the 2000s
I hated the 2000s because it was clear that men with lesser intelligence were using other people’s money to hyper-leverage their own personal net worth. The money wasn’t the point. The quantities of cash involved were so humongous they could never be spent. It was all about winning points in a game with the CEOs of the other big Wall Street institutions.
CEO Richard Fuld could have come out of central casting as a stereotypical bad guy. He even once offered me a job, which I wisely turned down. Fuld took his firm’s leverage ratio up to 100 times in an extended reach for obscene profits. This meant that a 1% drop in the underlying securities would entirely wipe out its capital.
That’s exactly what happened, and 10,000 employees lost their jobs, sent packing with no notice with their cardboard boxes. It was a classic case of a company piling on more risk to compensate for the lack of experience and intelligence.
This only ends one way.
Morgan Stanley (MS) and Goldman Sachs (GS) drew the line at 40 times leverage, and are still around today, but just by the skin of their teeth, thanks to the TARP.
Fuld has spent much of the last 12 years ducking in and out of depositions in protracted litigation. Lehman issued public bonds only months before the final debacle, and how he has stayed out of jail has amazed me. Today, he works as an independent consultant. On what I have no idea.
The head of equity trading, a very old friend of mine, sold all his Lehman stock well before the bankruptcy and today is content growing papayas on a farm in Hawaii. Timing is everything.
Out of Central Casting
6) The Manhasset Indians’ Sale of Manhattan to the Dutch in 1626
Only a single original period document mentions anything about the purchase of Manhattan. This letter states that the island was bought from the Indians for 60 guilders worth of trade goods, which would consist of axes, iron kettles, beads, and wool clothing.
No record exists of exactly what the mix was. Indians were notoriously shrewd traders and would not have been fooled by worthless trinkets.
The original letter outlining the deal is today kept at a museum in the Netherlands. It was written by a merchant, Pieter Schagen, to the directors of the West India Company (owners of New Netherlands or today’s New York) and is dated 5 November 1626.
He mentions that the settlers “have bought the island of Manhattes from the savages for a value of 60 guilders.” That’s it. It doesn’t say who purchased the island or from whom they purchased it, although it was probably the local Lenape tribe.
Historians often point out that North American Indians had a concept of land ownership different from that of the Europeans. The Indians regarded land, like air and water, as something you could use but not own or sell. It has been suggested that the Indians may have thought they were sharing, not selling.
It is anyone’s guess what Manhattan is worth today. Just my old two-bedroom 34th floor apartment at 400 East 56th Street is now worth $4 million. Better think in the trillions.
7) Napoleon’s 1803 Sale of the Louisiana Purchase to the United States
Invading Europe was not cheap, as Napoleon found out, and he needed some quick cash to continue his conquests. What could be more convenient than unloading France’s American colonies to the newly founded United States for a tidy $7 million. A British naval blockade had made them all but inaccessible anyway.
What is amazing is that President Thomas Jefferson agreed to the deal without the authority to do so, lacking permission from Congress, and with no money. What lay beyond the Mississippi River then was unknown. Today, Jefferson would have been impeached for that.
Many Americans hoped for a waterway across the continent, while others thought dinosaurs might still roam there. Jefferson just took a flyer on it. It was up to the intrepid explorers, Lewis and Clark, to find out what we bought.
Sound familiar? Without his bold action, the middle 15 states of the country would still be speaking French, smoking Gitanes, and getting paid in Euros.
After Waterloo in 1815, the British tried to reverse the deal and claim the American Midwest for themselves. It took Andrew Jackson’s (see the $20 bill) surprise win at the Battle of New Orleans to solidify the US claim.
The value of the Louisiana Purchase today is incalculable. But half of a country that creates $24 trillion in GDP per year and is still growing would be worth quite a lot.
Great General, Lousy Trader
8) The John Thomas Family Sale of Nantucket Island in 1740
Yes, my own ancestors are to be included among the worst traders in history. My great X 12 grandfather, a pioneering venture capitalist investor of the day from England, managed to buy the island of Nantucket off the coast of Massachusetts from the Indians for three ax heads and a sheep in the mid-1600s. Barren, windswept, and distant, it was considered worthless.
Two generations later, my great X 10 grandfather decided to cut his risk and sell the land to local residents just ahead of the Revolutionary War. Some 17 of my ancestors fought in that war, including the original John Thomas, who served on George Washington’s staff at the harsh winter encampment at Valley Forge during 1777-78.
By the early 19th century, a major whaling industry developed on Nantucket, fueling the lamps of the world with smoke-free fuel. By then, our family name was “Coffin,” which is still abundantly found on the headstones of the island’s cemeteries.
One Coffin even saw his ship, the Essex, rammed by a whale and sunk in the Pacific in 1821 (read about it in The Heart of the Sea by Nathaniel Philbrick). He was eaten by fellow crewmembers after spending 99 days adrift in an open lifeboat. Maybe that’s why I have an obsession about not wasting food?
In the 1840s, a young itinerant writer named Herman Melville visited Nantucket and heard the Essex story. He turned it into a massive novel about a mysterious rogue white whale, Moby Dick, which has been torturing English literature students ever since. Our family name, Coffin, is mentioned five times in the book.
Nantucket is probably worth many tens of billions of dollars today. Just a decent beachfront cottage there rents for $50,000 a week in the summer.
The Ron Howard film The Heart of the Sea is breathtaking. Just me happy you never worked on a 19th century sailing ship.
Yes, it’s all true and documented.
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Moby-Dick.jpg389387Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2023-10-13 09:04:372023-10-13 14:57:41The Eight Worst Trades in History
When John identifies a strategic exit point, he will send you an alert with specific trade information as to what security to sell, when to sell it, and at what price. Most often, it will be to TAKE PROFITS, but, on rare occasions, it will be to exercise a STOP LOSS at a predetermined price to adhere to strict risk management discipline.Read more
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Alert-e1457452190575.jpg135150april@madhedgefundtrader.comhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngapril@madhedgefundtrader.com2023-10-12 14:48:022023-10-12 15:17:04Tech Alert - (NFLX) October 12, 2023 - STOP LOSS - SELL
When I search for investment opportunities, it's rare for an old article to capture my attention. Yet, an article from The Wall Street Journal in January titled "Americans Can't Stop Pampering Their Pets - Companies Want In" has lingered in my thoughts. While the sentiment of treating pets as family isn't new, the financial implications of this trend are profound.
The global animal healthcare market, a sector once overlooked, has now burgeoned into a significant investment avenue. Recent data reveals the global animal healthcare market size was worth $40.21 billion in 2022.
Astoundingly, it's projected to soar to $84.98 billion by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 9.81%. This growth isn't just a fluke; it's propelled by rising animal health expenditure, increasing prevalence of diseases in animals, concerns over zoonoses, and strategic initiatives by industry giants.
A case in point: In January 2023, Merck (MRK) inaugurated a state-of-the-art manufacturing facility in Boxmeer, Netherlands, specifically for companion animal vaccines, responding to surging global demand.
But what's driving this demand? The answer lies in our plates and our living rooms.
On one hand, there's a rising global appetite for animal protein. While plant-based diets are gaining traction, the majority still lean towards animal-derived sources like eggs, meat, and milk. On the other hand, the human-animal bond has never been stronger, especially with pets. This bond translates to a willingness to spend on their well-being, ensuring they receive the best care possible.
Enter companies like Zoetis Inc. (ZTS). As the world's premier provider of animal medicines, vaccines, and diagnostic products, Zoetis stands at the forefront of this booming market.
With an impressive portfolio boasting over 300 product lines, including 15 blockbuster drugs, Zoetis has strategically positioned itself in two pivotal markets: companion animals (our beloved cats and dogs) and livestock (primarily cattle). Their dominance isn't just regional; they lead in North America, Latin America, and Asia.
To provide a snapshot of their market prowess, Zoetis recently highlighted that pet expenditure remains unaffected even in economic downturns, where household budgets shrink by 20%.
This resilience proves the anti-cyclical nature of the animal health sector, especially the companion animal segment. Concurrently, the livestock market is set to flourish, driven by a global population surge.
By 2050, with 2 billion more mouths to feed, the demand for healthcare products for livestock will inevitably skyrocket.
Notably, Zoetis isn't just riding the wave; they're steering it. Their growth strategy is clear: sustain a 3-point premium over market growth in the long term. This ambition is backed by a robust product portfolio, continuous innovation, and a keen understanding of market dynamics. Their focus isn't just on current market leaders like parasiticides but also on potential future heavyweights in areas like atopic dermatitis, cardiovascular diseases, chronic kidney diseases, and oncology.
So, what does this mean for investors?
Zoetis' financial trajectory is promising. Their revenue forecast for this year stands between $8.575 billion and $8.725 billion, marking a 6% to 8% rise.
Their earnings per share is also set to climb, with projections between $5.03 and $5.14, up from $4.49 in 2022.
Moreover, their consistent dividend hikes, with a recent 15% increase to $0.38, signal a company that's not only growing but also rewarding its shareholders.
Overall, with its blend of resilience and growth, the animal healthcare market presents a compelling investment opportunity. Zoetis, with their strategic vision, robust product portfolio, and financial strength, is poised to lead this sector. For investors eyeing long-term growth coupled with stability, adding this company to your portfolio is undoubtedly a prudent move. I recommend you buy the dip.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00april@madhedgefundtrader.comhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngapril@madhedgefundtrader.com2023-10-12 11:00:152023-10-12 11:02:56Barking Up The Right Stock
Legal Disclaimer
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.