“I think the market is going to get slammed this summer. The Fed is bad for financials, the dollar is a problem for industrials, and commodities are a problem for everybody,” said Scott Nations, president of NationShares.
Global Market Comments
April 25, 2024
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(RISK CONTROL FOR DUMMIES) or (THE HEADS I WIN, TAILS YOU LOSE STRATEGY),
(SPY), (FCX), (NVDA), (TLT)
Whenever I change my positions, the market makes a major move, suffers a “black swan” or reaches a key level, I stress test my portfolio by inflicting various scenarios upon it and analyzing the outcome.
This is common practice and second nature for most hedge fund managers.
In fact, the larger ones will use top-of-the-line mainframes powered by $100 million worth of in-house custom programs to produce a real-time snapshot of their positions in hundreds of imaginable scenarios at all times. This is the sort of thing Ray Dalio used to do.
If you want to invest with these guys feel free to do so.
They require a $10-$25 million initial slug of capital, a one-year lock-up, charge a fixed management fee of 2%, and a performance bonus of 20% or more.
You have to show minimum liquid assets of $2 million and sign 100 pages of disclosure documents.
If you have ever sued a previous manager, forget it.
And, oh yes, the best-performing funds have a ten-year waiting list to get in, as with my friend David Tepper. Unless you are a major pension fund like the State of California, they don’t want to hear from you.
Individual investors are not so sophisticated and it clearly shows in their performance, which usually mirrors the indexes with less of a large haircut.
So, I am going to let you in on my own, vastly simplified, dumbed down, the seat of the pants, down-and-dirty style of scenario analysis and stress testing that replicates 95% of the results of my vastly more expensive competitors.
There is no management fee, performance bonus, disclosure document, lock up, or upfront cash requirement. There’s just my token $3,500 a year subscription and that’s it.
To make this even easier for you, you can perform your own analysis in the Excel spreadsheet I post every day in the paid-up members section of Global Trading Dispatch.
You can just download it and play around with it whenever you want, constructing your own best-case and worst-case scenarios. To make this easy, please log into your Mad Hedge Fund Trader, click on “MY ACCOUNT”, then click on Global Trading Dispatch, then Current Positions, and download the Excel spreadsheet for April 25, 2024.
There you will find my current trading portfolio showing:
Current Capital at Risk
Risk On
(NVDA) 5/$710-$720 call spread 10.00%
(TLT) 5/$82-$85 call spread 10.00%
(FCX) 5/$42-$45 call spread 10.00%
Risk Off
(NVDA) 5/$960-$970 put spread -10%
Total Net Position 30.00%
Total Aggregate Position 40.00%
Since this is a “for dummies” explanation, I’ll keep this as simple as possible.
No offense, we all started out as dummies, even me.
I’ll the returns in three possible scenarios: (1) The (SPY) is unchanged at $505 by the May 17 expiration of my front month option positions, which is 15 trading days away, (2) The S&P 500 rises 5.0% to $530 by then, and (3) The S&P 500 falls 5.0% to $480.
Scenario 1 – No Change
The value of the portfolio rises from a 5.07% profit to a 13.00% Profit. My existing longs in (FCX), (TLT), and (NVDA) expire at their maximum profits. So does my one short in (NVDA).
Scenario 2 – S&P 500 rises to $530
You can easily forget about the long positions in (FCX), (TLT), and (NVDA) as they will expire well in the money. If they go up fast enough, I might even take an early profit and roll into a June or July position. Our short in (NVDA) might take some heat. But in the current environment of going into the summer doldrums, there is no way (NVDA) shoots up to a new all-time high, right where our strike prices were set at on purpose. The net of all this is that our portfolio should expire at a maximum profit for the year at up 13.00%.
Scenario 3 – S&P 500 falls to $480
All three of my stocks fall, but not enough for my three call spreads to go out of the money. (FCX) will stay above my stop-out level at $45, (TLT) at $85, and (NVDA) at $720. Obviously, the short in (NVDA) becomes a chipshot. Again, we expire at a maximum profit for the year at up 13.00%.
Up we make money, down we make money, sideways we make money, I like it! This is why I run long/short baskets of options spreads whenever the market allows me. It’s a “Heads I win, tails you lose strategy”.
If the market goes up, I’m looking for stocks to sell. If the market goes down, I'm looking for securities to buy. Boy low, sell high, I’m thinking of patenting the idea.
This is the type of extremely asymmetric risk/reward ratio hedge funds are always attempting to engineer to achieve outsized returns. It is also the one you want after the stock market has risen by 25% a year since the 2020 pandemic.
All that’s really happened is that the world has gone from slightly good to better this year. I can rejigger this balance anytime I want. If I think that a change in the economy or the Fed’s interest rate policy is in the works.
Keep in mind that these are only estimates, not guarantees, nor are they set in stone. Future levels of securities, like index ETF’s are easy to estimate. For other positions, it is more of an educated guess. This analysis is only as good as its assumptions. As we used to do in the computer world, garbage in equals garbage out.
Professionals who may want to take this out a few iterations can make further assumptions about market volatility, options implied volatility or the future course of interest rates. Keep the number of positions small to keep your workload under control. I never have more than ten. Imagine being at Goldman Sachs and doing this for several thousand positions a day across all asset classes.
Once you get the hang of this, you can start projecting the effect on your portfolio of all kinds of outlying events. What if a major world leader is assassinated? Piece of cake. How about another 9/11? No problem. Oil at $150 a barrel? That’s a gimme. What if there is an Israeli attack on Iranian nuclear facilities? That might take you all of two minutes to figure out. The Federal Reserve launches a surprise interest rate rise? I think you already know the answer.
The bottom line here is that the harder I work, the luckier I get.
Favorite headline of the day: "Greece Offers to Pay Back Debt With Giant Horse."
Global Market Comments
April 24, 2024
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THEY’RE NOT MAKING AMERICANS ANYMORE)
(SPY), (EWJ), (EWL), (EWU), (EWG), (EWY), (FXI), (EIRL), (GREK), (EWP), (IDX), (EPOL), (TUR), (EWZ), (PIN), (EIS)
If demographics is destiny, then America’s future looks bleak. You see, they’re not making Americans anymore.
At least that is the sobering conclusion of the latest Economist magazine survey of the global demographic picture.
I have long been a fan of demographic investing, which creates opportunities for traders to execute on what I call “intergenerational arbitrage”. When the numbers of the middle-aged big spenders are falling, risk markets plunge. Front run this data by two decades, and you have a great predictor of stock market tops and bottoms that outperforms most investment industry strategists.
You can distill this even further by calculating the percentage of the population that is in the 45-49 age bracket.
The reasons for this are quite simple. The last five years of child rearing are the most expensive. Think of all that pricey sports equipment, tutoring, braces, SAT coaching, first cars, first car wrecks, and the higher insurance rates that go with it.
Older kids need more running room, which demands larger houses with more amenities. No wonder it seems that dad is writing a check or whipping out a credit card every five seconds. I know, because I have five kids of my own. As long as dad is in spending mode, stock and real estate prices rise handsomely, as do most other asset classes. Dad, you’re basically one generous ATM.
As soon as kids flee the nest, this spending grinds to a juddering halt. Adults entering their fifties cut back spending dramatically and become prolific savers. Empty nesters also start downsizing their housing requirements, unwilling to pay for those empty bedrooms, which in effect, become expensive storage facilities.
This is highly deflationary and causes a substantial slowdown in GDP growth. That is why the stock and real estate markets began their slide in 2007, while it was off to the races for the Treasury bond market.
The data for the US is not looking so hot right now. Americans aged 45-49 peaked in 2009 at 23% of the population. According to US census data, this group then began a 13-year decline to only 19% by 2022.
You can take this strategy and apply it globally with terrific results. Not only do these spending patterns apply globally, they also back-test with a high degree of accuracy. Simply determine when the 45-49 age bracket is peaking for every country and you can develop a highly reliable timetable for when and where to invest.
Instead of pouring through gigabytes of government census data to cherry-pick investment opportunities, my friends at HSBC Global Research, strategists Daniel Grosvenor and Gary Evans, have already done the work for you. They have developed a table ranking investable countries based on when the 34-54 age group peaks—a far larger set of parameters that captures generational changes.
The numbers explain a lot of what is going on in the world today. I have reproduced it below. From it, I have drawn the following conclusions:
* The US (SPY) peaked in 2001 when our first “lost decade” began.
*Japan (EWJ) peaked in 1990, heralding 32 years of falling asset prices, giving you a nice backtest.
*Much of developed Europe, including Switzerland (EWL), the UK (EWU), and Germany (EWG), followed in the late 2000s and the current sovereign debt debacle started shortly thereafter.
*South Korea (EWY), an important G-20 “emerged” market with the world’s lowest birth rate peaked in 2010.
*China (FXI) topped in 2011, explaining why we have seen three years of dreadful stock market performance despite torrid economic growth. It has been our consumers driving their GDP, not theirs.
*The “PIIGS” countries of Portugal, Ireland (EIRL), Greece (GREK), and Spain (EWP) don’t peak until the end of this decade. That means you could see some ballistic stock market performances if the debt debacle is dealt with in the near future.
*The outlook for other emerging markets, like Indonesia (IDX), Poland (EPOL), Turkey (TUR), Brazil (EWZ), and India (PIN) is quite good, with spending by the middle age not peaking for 15-33 years.
*Which country will have the biggest demographic push for the next 38 years? Israel (EIS), which will not see consumer spending max out until 2050. Better start stocking up on things Israelis buy.
Like all models, this one is not perfect, as its predictions can get derailed by a number of extraneous factors. Rapidly lengthening life spans could redefine “middle age”. Personally, I’m hoping 72 is the new 42.
Emigration could starve some countries of young workers (like Japan) while adding them to others (like Australia). Foreign capital flows in a globalized world can accelerate or slow down demographic trends. The new “RISK ON/RISK OFF” cycle can also have a clouding effect.
So why am I so bullish now? Because demographics is just one tool in the cabinet. Dozens of other economic, social, and political factors drive the financial markets.
What is the most important demographic conclusion right now? That the US demographic headwind veered to a tailwind in 2022, setting the stage for the return of the “Roaring Twenties.” With the (SPY) up 27% since October, it appears the markets heartily agree.
While the growth rate of the American population is dramatically shrinking, the rate of migration is accelerating, with huge economic consequences. The 80-year-old trend of population moving from North to South to save on energy bills picking up speed, the Midwest is getting hollowed out at an astounding rate as its people flee to the coasts, all three of them.
As a result, California, Texas, Florida, Washington, and Oregon are gaining population, while Missouri, Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas, and Wyoming are losing it (see map below). During my lifetime, the population of California has rocketed from 10 million to 40 million. People come in poor and leave as billionaires, as Elon Musk did.
In the meantime, I’m going to be checking out the shares of the matzo manufacturer down the street.
“This could be the beginning of the end of the bond market,” said my friend, the legendary hedge fund manager, David Tepper.
Global Market Comments
April 23, 2024
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(WHY MOST SPAC’S ARE A SCAM)
(DJT), (PSTH), (SPAK), (NKLA)
I have been watching with some amusement the trading of the Trump Media & Technology Group (DJT).
After the IPO was issued in 2023, it soared to $130, then collapsed to $15. It has just completed another round trip, plunging 50% over the last month. This is for a company that posted a horrific $58 million loss in 2023. In no way can that support a $5 billion market cap at the current $22 share price unless it’s the next AI stock we don’t know about. (DJT) has become the latest meme stock.
So many hedge funds have lined up to sell that the borrowing costs have skyrocketed to an incredible 550%. (DJT) has become the latest meme stock. The former president owns 60% of the shares. Accusations of insider trading and fraud are rife. If the former president loses the election, goes to jail, or dies as a result of his unhealthy lifestyle (he’s 50 pounds overweight) the shares become worthless. In other words, it’s a stock that no professional investor would touch with a ten-foot pole.
Every investment bubble creates its special instruments of self-destruction and this one is no different.
There were highly touted leveraged commodity and gold funds during the seventies, portfolio insurance during the eighties, money-losing tech companies with lots of “eyeballs” in the nineties, and subprime lending in the 2000s.
In this cycle, we have the Special Purpose Acquisition Companies, otherwise known as “SPACs.”
The goal of a SPAC is to raise money first on some generalized investment theme, and then merge with a target company to achieve those goals. This allows companies to go public while skipping most disclosure requirements.
SPACs have their advantages for some people. It enables start-up companies with no track record or earnings to go public faster without the costs and regulatory scrutiny of the burdensome public IPO process. Promoters promise to get investors into the next Amazon (AMZN) or Facebook FB) early.
Easier said than done.
Some $162 billion was raised for SPACs in 2021 followed by a much more modest $15 billion in 2022 and $125 million in 2023. The largest has been hedge fund manager Bill Ackman’s Pershing Square Tontine Holdings Ltd. (PSTH) at $4 billion. There is even a SPAC for SPACs, the Defiance Gen SPAC Derived ETF (SPAK).
The performance of SPACs so far has been dismal. There have been 915 SPACs created since 2015. Only 93 managed to invest their funds in a target company and only 29 of those have produced a profit. This was during one of the greatest runaway bull markets of all time.
You would have done better to simply buy the cheapest Vanguard index funds or 90-day T-bills. In the meantime, the issuers of SPACs for the most part became wealthy.
The quality of the management who had stepped forward to run SPACs has been mixed at best, including Ackman himself, who recently ran two gargantuan money-losing years back to back. They include former House Speaker Paul Ryan and NBA Hall of Famer Shaquille O’Neil, not exactly known as financial wizards.
Then there’s Nikola (NKLA), an electric/hydrogen vehicle company that has promised to take on Elon Musk, unfazed by the complete lack of a functioning vehicle. These shares have cratered by 92% since their market peak among multiple fraud allegations aimed at the founder.
The risks and limitations of SPACs are legion. You are essentially betting on the good faith and judgment of a single individual unmoored by any filings with the SEC. There are no guarantees they can achieve anything. These disclosures to the government are there to protect you. Without them, you are swimming without a swimsuit.
The conflicts of interest are enormous. SPAC issuers get to buy the equivalent of call options on their funds at deep discounts prior to the issue. When issuers make fortunes overnight with little money upfront, you want to run a mile.
And here is the big problem with SPACs. They are essentially roach motel investments, easy to check in but impossible to check out. Liquidity going in is unlimited but coming out is nil. You can often only redeem your investment at a huge discount, or if another buyer is willing to take out at any price. That makes marks to market challenging at best.
Investors that buy SPACs are giving up all the protections of SEC protections for much higher risks and lower returns.
Suffice it to say that if PT Barnum were working in the financial markets, he’d be up to his eyeballs with SPAC offerings.
Personally, I’ll give them a pass. You should too.
The Problem is that it’s a Dummy
"If there were no way to short stocks, the probability of stock market bubbles would be much greater," said hedge fund manager, Bill Ackman, of Pershing Square.
