Remember the $2 trillion US corporate cash mountain that you have heard so much about? Well, it is finally starting to shrink. Have they started reinvesting profits in America? Are they hiring more people? Did they finally get those tax breaks they were begging for? Have they dramatically increased dividends and share buy backs or returned to acquisitions to boost earnings?
Well, not exactly. The cash mountain is shrinking, but for all the wrong reasons. They are just not earning as much money as they used to. According to data released by S&P Capital IQ, US corporate cash flow turned negative in Q1, 2012 for the first time since 2008. It almost certainly worsened in Q2.
The harsh truth is that earnings are falling because of collapsing revenues, which at the rate reported so far in this season look to come in at about 1% YOY. Adjust for inflation, and these figures turn negative. This means that the 5.4% YOY earnings growth we are seeing, which I predicted all the way back in my January annual asset revue, are being achieved through aggressive cost cutting.
Managers aren?t hiring more, they?re firing more, which explains our stubbornly high headline 8.2% unemployment rate. This can?t last. You can only eat your seed corn for so long before you go hungry.
This deterioration, which has been under reported and unappreciated, has economists slashing their forecasts for US GDP growth. It is clear that consumers are returning to their bomb shelters. I recently chopped my own forecast from 2% to 1.5%, and even that could start to look high in a matter of weeks. All of this sets up the scenario which I have been pounding the table about in my strategy seminars in Chicago, New York, London, Paris, Frankfurt, and Zermatt, which I have entitled ?The Crash of 2013?.
None of this makes a convincing case for buying equities right now. It makes the current 14 multiple for the S&P 500 look positively pricey. If there was ever a case for selling rips in the indexes it is now. Keep your fastest finger on your mouse ready to buy puts on the (SPX), (IWM), and (QQQ), and the bear ETF (SDS), and (SH).
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00DougDhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngDougD2012-07-24 23:03:052012-07-24 23:03:05US Earnings Are Headed Down the Drain
Over the last two months, I have witnessed one of the least convincing rallies in the US stock market in recent memory. Looking at the chart for the S&P 500 below you can clearly see a modest, low conviction, declining volume rally in an ever-narrowing channel. This is further confirmed by the chart of the NYSE advance/decline ratio that is failing at the March support level, which has now become resistance.
Look at any other asset class and it is flashing warning lights. Ten year Treasury bonds are within a hair?s breadth of blasting through to an all time low yield below 1.42%. We all know from hard earned experience that stocks and bonds never go up together for more than short periods, and that it is almost always the debt markets that get the longer-term trend right.
That flight to safety currency, the Japanese yen, is also screaming at us that trouble is just around the corner. It made it to the ? 77 handle, or over $125.00 in the (FXY) in recent days. People are certainly not buying the Japanese currency because they like Japan?s long-term fundamentals and demographics, which are the worst in the world. Nor are they buying for the yield, which is zero.
It appears that stocks have rallied because traders believe that the Federal Reserve will launch QE3 at its upcoming August 1 meeting. Bonds have been rallying because they think it won?t. Only one of these markets is right. That means the Fed won?t be able to take further easing action until early next year, well after the presidential election. By then, it will have every reason in the world to launch QE3, with the ?fiscal cliff? at the top of the list. That?s why Ben Bernanke is not inclined to waste ammo now.
In the meantime, The US, China, and Japan are all slowing and Europe is falling off a cliff. I was speaking to a hedge fund friend of mine this morning who told me the German paper he read said that they were abandoning Greece. I replied, ?That?s funny, the German paper I read said that they were abandoning Spain.? What ECB rescue funds that are in place are being challenged in the German Supreme Court, creating further uncertainty.
Travel around European main streets, as I have done for the last 10 days, and the ?FOR SALE? signs are everywhere. These are not a signal that I should rush out and buy equities right now, no matter how high the dividends are. They will be higher still, later.
All of this is setting up for an August that could be grizzly. A Fed disappointment will lead to a rapid unwind of the recent stock market rally, and could take us down to the 2012 low at 1,266 pronto, or more. A pop to a 1.25% yield in the ten-year Treasury is a chip shot.
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/sc72.jpg201267DougDhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngDougD2012-07-23 23:04:572012-07-23 23:04:57How the Fed Will Trigger the Next Crash
They are really rocking the market today, with the Dow up nearly 200 points off the back of a non-disastrous Chinese GDP growth figure of 7.7%. However, there is a serious disconnect going on in our markets which suggests to me that our own party may be about to end.
Yesterday?s blockbuster weekly jobless claim took applications for unemployment benefits down to a four-year low of 350,000. But if you ignore this, you have an unending series of data reports that shows an economy clearly decelerating to a growth rate of 1% per annum or less. That is one-seventh China?s rate.
And yet, you have an S&P 500 with a top end range that is a mere 3% within the high for the year. You don?t need a PhD in math from MIT to understand that rising stock prices and falling growth are an anomaly that can?t last and can only end in tears.
I think this is happening for a couple of reasons. Many traders are awaiting Q2, 2012 earnings reports and are willing to give companies the benefit of the doubt until they are out. Stocks are at the historic low end of valuation ranges. Many institutions are still underweight, and willing to use dips to pick up some bargains. This is why this summer has been a short seller?s nightmare, volatility has fallen through the floor, and many hedge funds have bailed for the duration.
I also think that many institutions are waiting for the Federal Reserve to announce QE III at their end of July meeting, thus powering the market to new yearly highs. I?m betting that they will be sorely disappointed. Ben Bernanke has so few bullets left to protect the economy that he will wait until the Indians are circling the wagons and unleashing a barrage of arrows, before he takes action. Quantitative easing is meant to be a safety net, not a stepladder from which to boost ever-higher asset prices. The Fed?s failure to deliver could give us the trigger we need to break to new lows in August.
Take a look at the charts below to see how clearly defined the recent channels and ranges are. Next time the SPX approaches 1,370, I might think about going short, taking out some downside insurance, selling out of the money calls, and generally getting yourself into a risk off posture. If you don?t, your summer could turn into a giant rainstorm.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00DougDhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngDougD2012-07-16 23:04:502012-07-16 23:04:50This Party is About to End
Back in March, oil broke the $110/barrel level and gasoline was rapidly approaching the $5/gallon level, threatening to derail Obama?s reelection campaign. The administration enlisted Europe to join it in a boycott of Iranian oil in an effort to get the Islamic republic to retreat from is program to develop a nuclear weapon. Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, responded by threatening to close the Straits of Hormuz, thus blocking exports to the west. It all had the makings of a first class crises that could have taken oil up to $125 or higher.
There was no way that the president was going to let Texas Tea to pee on his parade, so he took quick action to cut the knees out from under it. He threatened to release supplies from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve in Louisiana, which was chocked full. He browbeat the CFTC into substantially raising margin requirements for oil and other commodities with his attack on ?speculators?.
He then convinced Saudi Arabia to ramp up its production to the max, over 12 million barrels a day, to head off any ill-timed price spikes. The Saudis, believing it was time to discipline recalcitrant minor producing OPEC members, like Iran, with the threat of lower prices, happily complied.
Crude gave back $5 in the bat of an eyelash, and then launched a $33 downslide that had oil trading at the $77 handle on Monday. What Obama didn?t expect was an assist in his strategy to cripple oil prices from a flock of ?black swans?.
The next chapter in the European sovereign debt debacle pushed the continent into a more severe recession, cooling energy demand there. Libya has been bringing production on line faster than expected. Every downtick in China?s anticipated GDP growth rate shaves a few more dollars off oil. A shortage of pipeline capacity is causing oil to pile up at the massive storage facilities Cushing, Oklahoma, slowing export deliveries. It all adds up to a rare perfect storm for oil. To Obama?s delight, gasoline may be selling for the high $2 range in much of the country by the November election.
As I regularly harangue readers and attendees at my strategy luncheons, imminent America energy independence is the least understood but most important factor that will impact financial markets in the years ahead. Over the last two years, domestic production has soared from 8.5 million barrels a day to 10.5 million, thanks to the miracle of fracking technology, which I helped pioneer a decade ago. That?s more that we buy from Saudi Arabia annually.
North Dakota has just replaced Alaska as the second largest oil producing state. The boom there has been so rapid that massive RV camps of itinerate roustabouts now litter the Northern plains. In the meantime, imports have plummeted from 13 million barrels a day to only 9 million.
But I think the current crash in oil will be a temporary one. For a start, the Seaway pipeline reverses next week, breaking the Cushing bottleneck, enabling North Dakota oil to reach the Gulf ports. The current $78 oil price is already below the cost of the most important sources of supply, such as Canadian oil sands and deep offshore wells.
I think that financial markets will enjoy a ?RISK ON? rally starting from this summer as they start to discount the conclusion of the presidential election, the next European LTRO quantitative easing, and possibly a QE3 from the Federal Reserve. This could all pave the way for a rebound in oil to $90 or more.
So there is an attractive trade setting up here. You can buy the oil major ETF (DIG). Interesting single stock plays at these levels include ExxonMobile (XOM), Occidental Petroleum (OXY), and Cabot Oil & Gas (COG). You can also buy call spreads in the oil ETF (USO). A more cautious strategy might be to sell short out of the money puts on the (USO). Sure, the tracking error on this horrible ETF is huge, thanks to the contango, but at least you can take in the time premium.
My long term view on oil is that we spike one more time to $150-$200. Having spent 45 years studying the industry closely and knowing principals like Armand Hammer and Boone Pickens, I can tell you the one simple rule of thumb to observe with this industry. Doing anything costs extraordinary amounts of money and takes a really long time. The calloused men who run the oil majors don?t hesitate to spending tens of billions of dollars to finance projects in the most inhospitable parts of the world with 40 year payouts. No matter what we do today, it will be impossible to head off another severe oil shortage.
After that, we will fall to $10 as oil is removed from the global economy and is only used as a petrochemical feedstock for plastics, pharmaceuticals, asphalt, and jet fuel. This will happen because of the rise of cheap natural gas, alternative energy sources, more efficient building designs, a better power grid, the advent of low end nuclear power plants, and cars that get 100 miles per gallon or use no gasoline at all.
Of course the CEO?s of the oil majors laugh when I tell them this. I?m sure that the hay industry similarly laughed in 1900 if you told them about the coming demise of the horse as a mode of transportation. But it may take 40 year for us to get there. I hope I live to see it.
For the past two years, I have maintained a GDP growth forecast for the US of 2% a year. I have not stuck with this figure because I am stubborn, obstinate, or too lazy to update my analysis of the future of the world?s largest economy. I have kept this number nailed to the mast because it has been right.
I have watched other far more august institution with vastly more resources than I gradually ratchet down their own numbers towards mine, such as Goldman Sachs (GS) and the Federal Reserve. So I feel vindicated. But now that they are coming in line with my own subpar, lukewarm, flaccid 2% prediction, I am downsizing my forecast further to 1.5%. This is not good for risk assets anywhere, and may be what the markets are shouting at us with their recent hair raising behavior.
I am not toning down my future expectation because I am a party pooper or curmudgeon, although I have frequently been called this in the past. After all, hedge fund managers are the asset jockeys that everyone loves to hate. My more sobering outlook comes from a variety of fundamental changes that are now working their way through the system.
First, let me start with the positives, because it is such a short list. The work week is now the longest since 1945, no doubt being helped by onshoring triggered by rising Chinese wages. The car industry is in amazingly good shape, although the vehicles they are selling in larger numbers are much smaller than the behemoths of the past, with thinner profit margins. Credit is expanding, if you can get it. The housing market has finally stopped crashing and might actually add 0.3% to GDP this year.
Now for the deficit side of the balance sheet. The $4 trillion in wealth destruction created by the housing crash is still gone, and will remain missing in action for at least another decade. The home ATM is long gone. Income growth at 1.7% is still the slowest since the Great Depression, and is far below the historic 3% annual rate. Not only do people work longer hours, they get paid much less money for it.
Home mortgages rationed to only the highest credit borrowers has cut housing turnover off at the knees. This means fewer buyers of appliances and other things you need to remodel a new home purchase. It also kills job mobility, trapping worker where the jobs aren?t. Notice that vast suburbs remain abandoned in Las Vegas and Phoenix, while thousands live in impromptu RV camps in booming North Dakota.
If you want to understand the implications of the fiscal cliff at year end, watch the cult film, Thelma and Louise, one more time.? That?s where the heroines deliberately go plunging into the Grand Canyon in a classic Ford Thunderbird. The noise surrounding the presidential election is going settle ones nerves about as much as scratching one?s fingernails on a chalkboard.
The global situation looks far worse than our own. This is not good, as foreign sources account for 50% of S&P 500 earnings, and as much as 80% for many individual companies. To understand how wide the contagion has spread, look at the numbers put out on a recent JP Morgan forecast.
The European impact on our economy is about as welcome as the 1918 Spanish flu, when million died. (JPM) cut their expectation of growth there from -0.1% to -0.5%. Italy is shrinking at a -2.2% rate. Their prediction for growth in Latin America has been chopped -0.5% to 3.3%, while China has been pared by -0.5% to 7.7%. Japan is enjoying a rare 0.5% pop to 2.5%, but that is expected to fade once a massive round of tsunami reconstruction spending is done. Overall, global growth is decelerating from 4.5% to only 2%, with 82% of that growth coming from emerging markets. The last time a global slowdown was this synchronized was in 2008. Remember what stock markets did then?
All of this may be why hedge funds are fleeing this market in droves as fast as they can, including myself. Many of the small and medium sized funds I know are now 100% cash, and the big ones are only staying because they are trapped by their size. There are few good longs out there for the moment and fewer shorts. Prices are gyrating on a daily basis, triggered by overseas headlines where every else seems to have an unfair head start.
Suddenly the yacht at Cannes, the beach at the Hamptons, and the golf course at Pebble Beach seem much more alluring. Yes, clients dislike it when their managers are flat because they are getting paid for doing nothing. But they hate losing money even more.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00DougDhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngDougD2012-06-24 23:03:552012-06-24 23:03:55Why I Am Chopping My US GDP Forecast to 1.5%
It?s always nice when intelligent people agree with you. That was my feeling after the Federal Reserve gave notice today that it was downgrading its forecast of US economic growth for 2012 from 2.6% to 2.15%. That is a major step down from the 3% and higher predictions they were hanging on to earlier.
The news came in the written statement that followed the Fed?s somewhat disappointing decision today. As I expected, there will no QE3. The Fed needs to keep dry powder in case we get another market crash, possibly as early as this summer. Operation ?twist? was renewed for another year, but wasn?t extended to include mortgage backed securities. It was about as conservative of a conclusion one could have expected from the Fed, given the rapidly deteriorating economic data flow that I chronicle daily in these pages.
It brings the August panel of respected central bankers in line with my own 2% expectation, which I have been posting since January. Here?s a good rule of thumb from a four decade long Fed watcher: they are always behind the curve, sometimes way behind, often by a year or more.
The problem for you is that 2% is not my forecast anymore. As of today, I am ratcheting it down to 1.5%. Without a QE3 it is really hard to see where additional growth is going to come from this year. US corporations are producing record profits and sitting on mountains of cash, so they have absolutely no incentive to stick their necks out whatsoever. Additional government spending is hamstrung by an election year and a gridlocked congress.
Virtually the entire international arena is slowing, in some cases dramatically so. China is about to bust through the bottom of its target growth range at 7%, down from 13% a few years ago. Tsunami reconstruction spending in Japan has just about run its course. Europe is clearly in a major recession. Even powerhouse, Germany, is shrinking from 2% growth to 1% because of weakness in its major export markets.
The market implications of this lower growth rate are many. It means that the recent 100 point rally in the S&P 500 was built on so much hot air and false hope. It was never driven by more than a round of furious short covering and profit taking. Let the permabulls enjoy a few more days of summer, possibly taking the index as high as 1,400 by month end.
It also means that another round of pain for the Euro (FXE) (EUO) is not far off. The best case for Treasury bonds (TLT) is that they churn sideways until the next Fed meeting in six weeks. In the worst case, the spike up to challenge the old highs, taking yields up to 1.42% for the ten year once more.
The lows for the year haven?t been put in yet, but they are about to. Before, we had a 4% GDP stock market and a 2% GDP economy. Now we have a 4% GDP stock market and a 1.5% GDP real economy. Watch out below. The only question is whether 1,250 in the (SPX) holds this time, or whether we have to plumb the depths of 1,200 before the penance is paid for our hubris.
One of my best calls of the year was to plead with readers to avoid gold like the plague, periodically dipping in on the short side only. The barbarous relic has been in a bear market since it peaked at $1,922 an ounce at the end of August last year. Gold shares have fared much worse, with lead stock Barrack Gold (ABX) dropping 36% since then and the gold miners ETF (GDX) suffering a heart rending 43% haircut.
However, the recent price action suggests that hard times may be over for this hardest of all assets. Despite repeated attempts, the yellow metal has failed to break down below the $1,500 support level that I have been broadcasting as the line in the sand.
It has rallied $100 since the last try a few weeks ago. (GDX) has performed even better, popping 23%. For the last month, the entire precious metals space has traded like it was a call option on global quantitative easing (see yesterday?s piece). Dramatically worsening economic data is increasing the likelihood of further monetary easing generating a nice bid for gold.
Now the calendar is about to ride to the rescue as a close ally. It turns out that in recent years, there has been a major seasonal element to the gold trade, almost as good as the November/May cycle that drives the stock market. Gold typically sees a summer low. Then traders start anticipating the September Indian gold season when the purchase of gifts and dowries become a big price driver. That explains why India, with a population of 1.2 billion, is the world?s largest gold buyer.
Next comes the Christmas jewelry buying season in western countries. That is followed by the gift giving and debt repayments during the Chinese Lunar New Year, during which we see multi month peaks in the yellow metal. That is exactly what we saw this year. The only weakness in this argument is that a slowing Chinese economy could generate less demand this time.
These are heady inflows into such a small space. All of the gold mined in human history, from King Solomon's mines, to the bars still in Swiss bank vaults bearing Nazi eagles (I've seen them) would only fill 2.5 Olympic sized swimming pools. That amounts to 5.3 billion ounces, about $8.6 trillion at today's prices. For you trivia freaks out there, that is a cube with 66 feet on an edge. China is the largest producer (13.1%), followed by Australia (10%) and the US (8.8%).
Peak gold may well be upon us. Production has been falling for a decade, although it reached 94 million ounces last year worth $153 billion at today?s prices. That would rank gold 5th as a Fortune 500 company, just ahead of General Electric (GE). It is also only .38% of global public debt markets worth $40 trillion.
That is not much when you have the entire world bidding for it, governments and individuals alike. Talk about getting a camel through the eye of a needle! We may well see the bull market end only when those two asset classes, government bonds and gold, see outstanding values reach parity, implying a major increase in gold prices from here. That is well above my own personal target of the old inflation adjusted high of $2,300. No wonder buying is spilling out into the other precious metals, silver (SLV), platinum (PPLT), and palladium (PALL).
The thumbnail technical view here is that we have broken the 50 day moving average at $1,610, so we may have a clear shot at the 200 day average at $1,680. There may be an easy $50 here for the nimble, and more if we break that. The current ?RISK ON? mood certainly helps this trade.
When playing in the gold space, I always prefer to buy the futures or the (GLD), the world?s second largest ETF by market cap, either outright or through a longer dated call spread. The dealing costs are far too high for trading physical bars and coins, and can run as high as 30% for a round trip. Having spent 40 years following mining companies, I can tell you that there are just way too many things that can go wrong with them for me to risk capital. They can get nationalized, suffer from incompetent management, hedge out their gold risk, get hit with strikes or floods, or get tarred by poor equity market sentiment. They also must endure the highest inflation rate of any industry, around 15%-20% a year, which hurts the bottom line.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00DougDhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngDougD2012-06-18 23:02:302012-06-18 23:02:30Gold is Making a Comeback
The victory of the centrist pro bailout New Democracy Party in the Sunday Greek elections sparked a furious rally in the overnight Asian markets, much of it driven by hedge fund short covering. The socialist, anti-bailout parties went down in flames. As I write this on Sunday night, the Dow futures are trading up 78 points from the Friday close and the Japanese yen is in free-fall. Too bad that I?m 110% long ?RISK ON? positions in my model portfolio.
That was no surprise as 70% of Greeks want to stay in the EC. The way is now paved for a more civilized workout of the country?s financial problems which spreads austerity out over many more years, making it more tolerable and digestible for its citizens.
The latest Commitment of Traders report showed the Euro (FXE) (EUO) shorts in the futures hit yet another all-time high, and that the underlying was now worth $20 billion in the foreign exchange market. Shorts in the interbank cash market and ETF?s are thought to be much larger. On top of that, central banks have been seen unloading reserves denominated in Euros.
This witches brew of one-sided positions made up the perfect ingredients for the type of rip-your-face-off, snap back short covering rally that we have seen in past days. This is why I covered my own shorts three weeks ago when it pierced the $126 handle.
Keep in mind that the media has a lot of blood on its hands with its wild over exaggeration in its predictions of the imminent collapse of Greece and its withdrawal from the European Community that was never going to happen. It is focusing 99% of its attention on the Land of Socrates and Plato that accounts for 1% of European GDP. In the meantime, it is ignoring Germany which has 30% of GDP and is still growing, albeit at a slower 1% rate.
CNBC, in particularly, seems to be mercilessly beating this dead horse, holding it out as an example of what will happen to the US if it pursues similar high spending polices. This is why they send a Tea Party activist out to Athens at great expense every week to provide your coverage and to bait the Socialist candidates. They haven?t been this wrong since they reported that the Facebook issue was 30 times oversubscribed in Asia the night before it became the worst IPO in history.
But Greece has about as much in common with America as the US Treasury has with the bankrupt city of Vallejo, California. If anything, Greece is a perfect example of what happens when the wealthy get away with paying no taxes. Anyone with substantial means there stashes their dosh in Swiss bank accounts, leaving only the poor to cough up government revenues. Rich Greeks are just better at it than Americans. After all, they have been practicing for 5,000 years.
Greece is so small that it would be economic for Germany to just pay off half of its national debt just to maintain stability for its largest export markets. Should they spend $270 billion to protect $1.27 trillion in annual exports? It makes sense to me.
And let me give you a little back story here which you probably haven?t heard. Where did all this debt come from? Greedy unions? Careless bureaucrats? Spendthrift socialists? Expensive national health care?? A very big chunk was the result of the 2004 Athens Olympics where the government spent billions on huge sporting facilities and infrastructure that would only be used once and that it could never afford. Who constructed these massive edifices? German engineering firms. I know because I was there. There is always more to the story than the headline.
I hope my guests at my upcoming July 18 Frankfurt strategy luncheon don?t tar and feather me, or whatever they inflict on miscreants there, for expressing this opinion.
All of this is leading up to a great shorting opportunity for the beleaguered European currency. Given the current positive background, it could make it all the way back up to $127.80. That is a neat 50% retracement of the recent move down from $132.80 to $123.00. But be careful not to fall in love with it. The major trend in the Euro is still down, aiming for $1.17. And with a 0.50% interest rate cut by the European Central Bank imminent, that target could be hit sooner than later.
The wild whipsaw movements in the markets on Thursday reminded us once again how dependent they have become on monetary stimulus from central banks. As if we needed reminding. Almost simultaneously, officials from the US, Japan and the UK hinted at a coordinated move at this weekend?s G-20 meeting in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico.
Let?s hope for the sake of global financial stability that no one eats a bad taco down there. And say ?Hello? to Miguel for me at the notorious drinking establishment, The Giggling Marlin. Just make sure he doesn?t pick your pocket when he hangs you upside down by your ankles with a block and tackle to give you a tequila shot.
The rumors were enough to cause me to cover my sole remaining short position in the S&P 500 (SPY) and bat out some additional shorts in the Japanese yen, which would go into free fall in such a scenario. If the rumors are true, they will take the (SPX) up to 1,400 and I will make a killing on my hefty long positions in (AAPL), (HPQ), (JPM), (DIS) and shorts in (FXY) and (TLT). If not, then the large cap index will revisit 1,290 one more time and I will be left looking like a dummy while posting an embellished resume on Craig?s List.
To see how closely risk assets are correlated with quantitative easing, take a look at the chart produced below by my friend, Dennis Gartman of The Gartman Letter. It graphically presents the market response to QE1, QE2, and Operation Twist, which are highlighted in green. In fact, quantitative easing has become the on/off switch of the financial markets. Hence, we get ?RISK ON?/?RISK OFF? gyrations in spades.
While on the topic of monetary policy, let?s consider the implications of a Romney win in the November presidential election. The former Massachusetts governor and son of a Michigan governor has said that he would fire Federal Reserve Governor, Ben Bernanke, on his first day in office.
Well, he actually can?t do that, although it is great fodder for the faithful on the hustings. What he can do is appoint and anti QE, pro-austerity replacement when Ben?s second four year term is up on January 31, 2014. At the top of the list of replacements are Stanford University?s John Taylor of Taylor Rule fame and sitting non-voting board member, president of the Dallas Fed, and noted hawk, Richard Fisher.
How would the financial markets react? Much of the recent buying of stocks and other risk assets has been on the assumption that the ?Bernanke Put? would kick in on any serious selloff. No Bernanke means no Bernanke put. I can already hear portfolio managers thinking ?What, you mean there is risk in these things?? and heading for the exits as quickly as possible. The resulting market crash could make 2008-2009 look like a cakewalk. Your 401k would rapidly shrink to a 201k, and your IRA would become DOA. So be careful what you wish for.
That is unless you are a reader of this letter and a subscriber to my Trade Alert Service. Such a market meltdown would be one of the great shorting opportunities of the century. But to follow the game you have to have a program.
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/2000306-Hanging_with_the_best_of_them_Cabo_San_Lucas.jpg299400DougDhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngDougD2012-06-14 23:03:552012-06-14 23:03:55Be Careful What You Wish For
I was as stunned as anyone when the yield on the ten year Treasury bond (TLT), (TBT) plummeted to 1.42% two weeks ago. Predictions that long dated government paper would reach subterranean Japanese levels, considered loony as recently as a few months ago, are now donning the mantle of respectability, and even plausibility. Where will this end? With yields at 1.25%, 1%? 0.50%?
As with any ground breaking, epoch making, even cataclysmic change in the fundamental structure in the global financial markets, I searched for the reasons why I didn?t see this coming. How could I be so wrong? What did I miss? I haven?t been this far off base since the term ?blue dress? entered the political lexicon.
Then I looked at the recent ownership of the Treasury bond market and the answer was so obvious that it practically lifted me up by the lapels of my Brioni jacket and shook me until the gold inlays fell out of my teeth. The implications for international finance are huge, and are even bigger for your own net worth.
It turns out that governments have been steadily taking over the global bond market, not just Uncle Sam, but all major countries that have been pursuing quantitative easing. As a result, private ownership of Treasury bonds has shrunk from 55% thirty years ago, to only 23% today. Foreign holders, primarily central banks, have increased their portfolios from 13% to 34% during the same period. The Federal Reserve?s ownership of the Treasury market has soared from 5% to 11% since 2012, thanks to QE1, QE2, and the twist policy.
Therein lays the problem. Governments aren?t like you and I. They are the ultimate ?dumb money?. Once they buy a bond, they don?t care what the price is. They just carry it on their books at face value. They don?t need to mark to market. When debt matures, they just roll it over into similar issues. If you or I tried this, we would go to jail, and possibly even share the same cell.
The bottom line on all of this is that governments are uneconomic, irrational, and even price insensitive buyers. If the price goes up they don?t care. They also don?t do what the rest of us do when prices spike, as they have done, and that is sell. That?s because they don?t have clients like we do. This has created an unnatural market where the demand for government paper is nearly limitless, and the supply is inadequate.
Using this analysis, the big surprise is not that ten year yields hit 1.42%, but that they took so long to get there. This also suggests that bond interest rates will stay unbelievably low far longer than anyone realizes, possibly for years more.
There is another angle to this, which the pols on Capitol Hill failed to recognize. As a result of the new Dodd-Frank financial regulation bill, many derivatives contracts will become marginable for the first time. With the aggregate amount of such contracts estimated at $700 trillion, even just a minimal 1% collateral requirement would automatically create $7 trillion in potential Treasury paper buying.
That is little less than half the current $15 trillion national debt. In fact, it was massive government mandated bond buying in Japan just like this that kept interest rates so low there for so long. I know because I have written three books on this topic.
Much of the current political debate revolves around the belief that the US government is borrowing too much money. But the markets are screaming at us that the complete opposite is true. It is not borrowing enough. There is in fact a global savings glut and bond shortage that looks to get worse before it gets better. As for the monstrous, untamable inflation that such high levels of borrowing created in the past, like the Loch Ness Monster, the Yeti, and Bigfoot, and I?ll believe it when I see it.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00DougDhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngDougD2012-06-13 23:03:282012-06-13 23:03:28The Nationalization of the Bond Market
Legal Disclaimer
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.
We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
Essential Website Cookies
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
Google Analytics Cookies
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visist to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
Other external services
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.
(
Time for Another Shot of Monetary easing
