• support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Member Login
Mad Hedge Fund Trader
  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Luncheons
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Tag Archive for: (AAPL)

MHFTR

Why the Big Deal Over ZTE?

Tech Letter

Here's the conundrum.

Beyond cutting-edge technology, there's nothing that China WANTS OR NEEDS to buy from the U.S. China's largest imports are in energy and foodstuffs, both globally traded commodities.

China is playing the long game because it can.

Earlier this year, China altered its constitution to remove term limits and any obstacle that would hinder Chairman Xi to serve indefinitely.

If it's two, four, eight or 10 years, no problem, China will wait it out.

As it stands, China is enjoying the status quo, which is a robust economic trajectory of 6.7% economic growth YOY and at that rate will leapfrog America as the biggest economy in the world by 2030.

China does not need handouts.

It already has its mooncake and is eating it.

The Chinese are also betting that Donald Trump fades away with the passage of time, possibly soon, and that a vastly different administration will enter the fray with an entirely different strategy.

The indefinite "hold" pattern is a polite way to say we surrender.

ZTE Corporation is a Chinese telecommunications equipment manufacturer and low-end smartphone maker based in Shenzhen, China.

This seemingly innocuous company is ground zero for the U.S. vs China trade practice dispute.

The U.S. Department of Commerce banned American tech companies from selling components to ZTE for seven years, crippling its supply chain after violating sanctions against Iran and North Korea.

ZTE uses about 30% of American components to produce its smorgasbord of telecom equipment and down-market cell phones.

What most people do not know is that ZTE is the fourth most prevalent smartphone in America, only behind Apple, Samsung, and LG, commanding a 12.2% market share, and its phones require an array of American made silicon parts.

In 2017, the company shipped more than 20 million phones to the United States.

The ruling effectively put ZTE out of business because the lack of components shelved production.

Low-end smartphones account for almost one-third of total revenue.

ZTE could very well have survived with a direct hit to its consumer phone business, but the decision to ban components made the telecom equipment division inoperable.

This segment accounts for a heavy 58.2% of revenue. Therefore, disrupting ZTE's supply chain would effectively take down more than 91% of its business for a company that employs 75,000 employees in over 160 countries.

Upon news of ZTE's imminent demise, the administration made a U-turn on its initial decision stating "too many jobs in China lost."

The reversal made America look bad.

It shows that America is being dictated to and not the other way around.

When did it become the responsibility of the American administration to fill Chinese jobs for a company that is a threat to national security?

The Chinese refused to continue talks with the visiting delegation until the ZTE situation was addressed.

Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin and company were able to "continue" the talks then were politely shown the door.

Bending the rules for ZTE should have never been a prerequisite for talks, stressing the lack of firepower in the administration's holster.

However, stranding the delegation in Chinese hotel rooms for days waiting in limbo, without offering an audience, would have caused even more humiliation and anguish for the administration.

China is not interested in buying much from America, but one thing it needs -- and needs in droves -- are chips.

Long term, this ZTE ban is great for China.

I believe China will use this episode to rile up the nationalistic rhetoric and make it a point to wean itself from American chips.

However, for the time being, American chips are the most valuable import America can offer China, and that won't change for the foreseeable future.

The numbers back me up.

Micron (MU) earns more than $10 billion in revenue from China, which makes up over 51% of its total revenue.

Qualcomm (QCOM), mainly through its lucrative licensing division, makes more than $14.5 billion from its Chinese revenue, which comprises over 65% of revenue.

Texas Instruments (TXN) earns more than 44% of revenue from China, and almost a quarter of Intel's (INTC) revenue is derived from its China operations.

The biggest name embedded in China is Apple (AAPL), which earned almost $45 billion in sales last year. Its China revenue is three times larger than any other American company.

In less than a decade, China has caught up.

China now has adequate local smartphone substitutes through Huawei, Oppo, Vivo, and Xiaomi phones.

Skyworks Solutions (SWKS), a chip company reliant on iPhone contracts, is most levered toward the Chinese market capturing almost 83% of revenue from China.

You would think these chips would be the first on the chopping block in a trade war. However, you are wrong.

China needs all the chips it can get because there is no alternative.

Stopping the inflow of chips is another way of stopping China from doing business and developing technology.

The Chinese economy has been led by the powerful BATs of Baidu (BIDU), Tencent, and Alibaba (BABA) occupying the same prominent role the American FANGs hold in the American economy.

They are not interested in digging their own grave.

To execute the 2025 plan to become the world leaders in advanced technology, they need chips that power all modern electronic devices.

The most likely scenario is that China maintains development using American chips for the time being and slowly pivots to the Korean chip sector, which is vulnerable to Chinese political pressure.

Remember that South Koreans have two of the three biggest chip companies in the world in Samsung and SK Hynix. China has used economic coercion to get what it wants from Korea in the past or to prove a point.

Korean multinational companies, shortly after the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) installation on the Korean peninsula, were penalized by the Chinese government shutting down mainland Korean stores, temporarily banning Chinese tourism in South Korea, and blocking K-pop stars from performing in the lucrative Chinese market.

The Chinese communist government can turn the screws when it wants and how it wants.

Therefore, the next battleground for tech could migrate to South Korean chip companies as China is on a mission to suck up as much high-grade tech ingenuity as possible while it can.

China has some easy targets to whack down if the administration forces it into a corner with a knife to its throat.

Non-tech companies are ripe for massacre because they do not produce chips.

Companies such as Procter & Gamble, Starbucks, McDonald's, and Nike could be replaced by a Chinese imitation in a jiffy.

Apple is the 800-pound gorilla in the room.

An attack on Apple would hyper-accelerate tension between two leaders to the highest it's ever been and would be the straw that breaks the camel's back.

Technology has transformed the world.

Technology also has been adopted by nations as a critical component to national security.

Nothing has changed fundamentally, and nothing will.

China will become the biggest economy in the world by 2030.

China will kick the proverbial can down the road because it can. It never has to cooperate with America again.

Contrary to expectations, American chip companies are untouchable, and investors won't see Micron suddenly losing half its revenue over this trade war.

Until China can produce higher quality chips, it will lap up as much of Uncle Sam's chips until it can force transfer the chip technology from the Koreans.

American chip companies can breathe a sigh of relief.

 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Quote of the Day

"If we go to work at 8 a.m. and go home at 5 p.m., this is not a high-tech company and Alibaba will never be successful. If we have that kind of 8-to-5 spirit, then we should just go and do something else." - said Alibaba founder and executive chairman Jack Ma.

 

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-05-23 01:05:202018-05-23 01:05:20Why the Big Deal Over ZTE?
MHFTR

May 16, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
May 16, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(WHAT'S UP AT FACEBOOK?)

(FB), (NFLX), (GOOGL), (AMZN), (GS), (AAPL), (IBM)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-05-16 01:06:272018-05-16 01:06:27May 16, 2018
MHFTR

What's Up at Facebook?

Tech Letter

Capitol Hill unleashed a healthy dose of criticism on Facebook (FB) CEO Mark Zuckerberg and he has mobilized the forces to avoid a repeat shellacking.

Zuckerberg's response has been to reshuffle his cabinet at the Menlo Park, CA, headquarters, and a few tell-tale signs offer a unique glimpse into Facebook's future.

Basically, something needed to change at Facebook.

The company single-handedly took the blame for the entire sector and was not the only company with a liberal stance on personal data.

Zuckerberg would like to eschew public humiliation and avoid being a sitting duck.

The episode in Washington highlights the need for Facebook to decouple itself from ad revenue, which makes up the lion's share of revenue at the firm and find other levers to pull.

Down the road, Facebook's ad business could get crimped by regulators, and a lack of fallback options haunts Facebook investors in their sleep.

Consequently, a whole slew of high-level management rotation is underway at Facebook.

It is the biggest shake-up in the history of Facebook.

The road map starts with one of Zuckerberg's best friends and protege Chris Cox who will manage the new "family of apps" segment.

This collection of projects he will preside over include WhatsApp, Messenger, Instagram, and the Facebook Core App.

The step up in responsibility is warranted for Chris Cox who was credited with creating the Facebook news feed after joining the company in 2005 after ditching his Stanford graduate degree program at the time.

The executive reshuffle coincided with WhatsApp co-founder Jan Koum, one of Silicon Valley's biggest advocates for data privacy, who quit his post as a show of disapproval to Facebook's business model.

Mark Zuckerberg wants to aggressively monetize the WhatsApp messenger service that was acquired for $19 billion in 2014.

Zuckerberg's blueprint involves using the WhatsApp phone numbers as a vehicle to monetize through offering different products.

Facebook would then collect the data from its 1 billion usership and WhatsApp would become Facebook's new advertisement clearing house.

WhatsApp's leadership vehemently refused this U-turn and Koum decided he would rather leave then see his baby ruined.

Facebook consistently refrained in the past from passing WhatsApp to the data mining scientists and was able to prevent full-scale implementations of advertisements onto its platform.

Currently, there are no ads on WhatsApp's interface, and users could be in store for a massive transformation in look and feel.

Facebook investors have been clamoring for Zuckerberg to start the process of making WhatsApp into a material revenue stream.

Time is of the essence as the big data police creep in from the shadows.

Putting Zuckerberg's top guy on the job embarks Facebook down a new path of hyper accelerated profit-making.

Well, that is the goal.

Compounding Facebook's pivot to other businesses is commissioning a new blockchain tech team.

Blockchain technology, the technology that helped unearth bitcoin, has seen a recent slew of endorsements from financial heavy hitters such as Goldman Sachs (GS), which acknowledged the formation of a new business brokering in bitcoin futures.

A year ago, no reputable organization would touch blockchain with a 10-foot pole.

The utilization of blockchain technology would allow trackability and provide more security.

That would help Facebook to understand the provenance of unique problems allowing staff to nip problems in the bud before they snowball.

Blockchain tech fits nicely within the constraints of the model and would enhance the existing Facebook product.

Let's not forget that Facebook has a mountain of cash to fix any problem that crops up.

It is not one of these early stage seed companies burning through heaps of cash waiting for "scalability" down the road.

Facebook is here and now, and it has the money to show for it.

The pillars of blockchain revolve around cryptography. Blockchain would effectively allow individuals to possess more power over their identity decentralizing the stranglehold from Menlo Park.

Thus, Facebook must invest deeply into blockchain to counter the fear that this technology can marginalize the core business.

This epitomizes the tendency for large-cap tech to become preemptive.

None of the powerful FANGs want to miss the next big shift in technology, and the cash hoard allows them to have skin in the game in each revolutionary trend.

The tide has changed at Facebook from the early years where growing the user base was paramount.

Now that user base has matured into a 2.2 billion marketplace.

Facebook's strategy has shifted to extracting more revenue per user and management closely follows this metric.

Mike Schroepfer, the CTO of Facebook, was tabbed as the man leading the charge for Artificial Intelligence (A.I.), Augmented Reality (A.R.), and Virtual Reality (V.R.) technology.

Facebook was able to poach Jerome Pesenti from IBM (IBM), where he was a critical cog in the development of IBM's Watson, to run the Facebook A.I. team. A.I. is routinely implemented into Facebook's core products to enhance performance.

Promoting Chris Cox as the next in line and giving him control over all the powerful products effectively pushes ad tech down the pecking order.

Javier Olivan is the new man at Facebook tasked for managing ads, analytics, and integrity, growth and product management.

Moving forward, the ad division will be laced with a certain level of security to avoid a repeat of Cambridge Analytica.

Zuckerberg must know that there are other Cambridge Analytica's hidden somewhere in the system; another incident would knock down the stock 5% to 10%.

Facebook could look vastly different in a few years if some of these profit drivers prove successful. It only needs one to work.

Disrupt or be disrupted.

At this point, the big tech companies are considering anywhere or anyone to capture accelerated growth. The FANGs are spilling over to other companies' turf.

Crossover is everywhere and this is just the beginning.

Expect Amazon's (AMZN) ad division to grow from the already $2 billion per quarter, gradually challenging the duopoly of Facebook and Alphabet in the digital ad revenue industry.

It is yet to be seen if the new revamp of management will produce better results.

This move could backfire as the management carousel excluded any fresh blood from taking part.

Effectively, Zuckerberg rotated his best friends into different parts of the business without demoting anyone.

Solidifying his close-knit circle of trust is no doubt a defensive reaction to being hounded the past few months, leaving his existing circle as the few people on which he can still count.

Facebook's stock remains healthy and the brouhaha stoked by the data leak gave investors a timely entry point.

I pounded on the table calling the bluff, begging readers to get into Facebook.

The long-term Facebook story is intact but the stock is overbought short-term.

Investors should not sleep on Facebook as it is a profit machine printing money like Apple (AAPL) and the executive revamp is a bullish development for Facebook.

My bet is that Chris Cox goes for the low hanging fruit monetizing WhatsApp, inciting the next leg up in Facebook shares later in the year.

 

 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Quote of the Day

"Simply put: We don't build services to make money; we make money to build better services." - said Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg

 

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Zuckerberg-on-the-Hill-image-2-e1526417830446.jpg 343 580 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-05-16 01:05:032018-05-16 01:05:03What's Up at Facebook?
MHFTR

May 14, 2018

Diary, Newsletter

Global Market Comments
May 14, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(THURSDAY, JUNE 14, 2018, NEW YORK, NY, GLOBAL STRATEGY LUNCHEON),
(THE MARKET OUTLOOK FOR THE WEEK AHEAD, OR TAKING ANOTHER BITE AT THE APPLE),
(AAPL),
(FAREWELL TO DAVID ROCKEFELLER)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-05-14 01:09:282018-05-14 01:09:28May 14, 2018
MHFTR

The Market Outlook for the Week Ahead, or Taking Another Bite at the Apple

Diary, Newsletter, Research

What happens after markets test the top end of a range? They test the bottom end of the range. So, the game here is to pick where and when is the next short-term top.

Now that Q1 earnings are out of the way, there is no major positive driver of the market for two more months, until the end of July, when the Q2 earnings start to roll out. And they will be good.

That leaves us only geopolitical shocks and chaos from Washington as the major market influences, and none of those are going to be positive. When traders shift from a focus on earnings to fear, the result is usually negative for share prices.

One major event that occurred last week but was totally ignored by the media was the administration's trade negotiating team scampering back from China completely empty handed. They called his bluff. So, the trade war is still on, it's just moved from the front burner to the back burner. Don't get complacent.

And here is the worrisome issue for the bulls. Q1 earnings were up 25.5% YOY, one of the best in my long career. Revenues accounted for 8.3%, margin improvements 8.1%, new tax breaks 7.6%, and share buybacks 1.5%. This means that 35.6% of the total earnings were from one-time only benefits that aren't going to be there next year.

Given that the global economy is slowing down, revenue and margin improvement will probably drop by half next year. That means the best case for Q1 2019 earnings will show a drop from 25.5% to only 8.2%.

It's not a matter of IF the market will top out, but WHEN. Enjoy the bull move while it lasts. It isn't going to be there next year.

I decided to sit out the current leg up in the market. I didn't think it would be big or sustained enough to squeeze in another round trip. Besides, after shooting out 26 Trade Alerts in April earning an eye-popping 12.54% profit, not only was my staff exhausted, so were the followers.

My year-to-date return stands at a robust 19.30%, my trailing one-year returns have risen to 55.59%, and my eight-year sits at an 295.77% apex.

And remember, the market is making this move in the face of rising oil prices and interest rates, always bull market killers.

Of course, nobody at Apple (AAPL) cares about any of this one wit, as its stock blasted through to new all-time highs every day last week. Steve Jobs' creation is on a race to a $1 trillion market capitalization and was worth $930 billion at the market high. That's when Apple will have the same GDP as Russia or Australia.

The dividend yield has fallen to 1.56%. The company is increasingly being viewed as a luxury brand commanding a much higher multiple than the 9X that it earned when it was perceived as a lowly hardware company. By the way, Ferrari (RACE) has a price earnings multiple of 39X versus Apple's current 16X ex-cash.

I'll be raising my target for the stock from $200 to $220 as soon as I get time to write the report. Steve Jobs must be smiling down from Heaven. By the way, this service first recommended Apple as a strong "BUY" in 2010 when the shares traded at $10. That's a gain of 1,900%. Click here for the link.

Apple's stellar gains were part of a much broader move back into technology, which we expected. It turns out that the semiconductor cycle IS NOT ending after all, as predicted by the neophyte coverage of UBS.

Suddenly, all is forgiven at Facebook (FB), as the shares are now 2% short of an all-time high. Amazon is going from strength to strength, with Amazon Web Services' cloud business now accounting for an impressive $50 billion of sales and is growing at a breakneck 50% a year.

It all goes back to my seminal rule of investing that has worked for my entire 50-year career. While much of the rest of the U.S. economy is slowly fading from the scene, TECHNOLOGY ALWAYS COMES BACK!

The last of the Q1 earnings reports will dribble out this week.

On Monday, May 14, at 3:00 PM, we get a deluge of Feds speakers, now that the quiet period from the last meeting is over.

On Tuesday, May 15, at 8:30 AM EST, we receive the April Retail Sales, which has been red hot as of late. Home Depot (HD), a long-time Mad Hedge favorite, reports.

On Wednesday, May 16, at 8:30 AM, the April Housing Starts. Cisco Systems (CSCO) reports.

Thursday, May 17, leads with the Weekly Jobless Claims at 8:30 AM EST, which remained unchanged last week at 211,000, a 43-year low. At 10:00 AM EST, the April Index of Leading Economic Indicators is released, a compilation of 10 forward-looking statistics compiled by the private Conference Board. Applied Materials (AMAT) reports.

On Friday, May 18, we wrap up with the Baker Hughes Rig Count at 1:00 PM EST. Deere & Co. (DE) reports.

As for me, I'll be working in the garden this weekend. It's time to plant the pumpkins if I want nice jack-o-lanterns by Halloween, the tomatoes are thriving, and I will have an ample supply of fresh pepper this coming winter.

Good Luck and Good Trading.

 

 

 

 

Rolling in the Clover

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Trailing-one-year-story-2-image-1-e1526073868553.jpg 322 580 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-05-14 01:07:462018-05-14 01:07:46The Market Outlook for the Week Ahead, or Taking Another Bite at the Apple
MHFTR

May 9, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
May 9, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(HERE'S THE TOP STOCK IN THE MARKET TO BUY TODAY),
(MSFT), (AMZN), (AAPL), (APTV), (QCOM), (FB)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-05-09 01:06:162018-05-09 01:06:16May 9, 2018
MHFTR

Here's the Top Stock in the Market to Buy Today

Tech Letter

When the CEO of Microsoft, Satya Nadella, sits down for a candid interview, I move mountains then cross heaven and hell to listen to him, and you should, too.

Microsoft is at the top of my list as a conviction buy.

Nadella is one of the great CEOs of our time and was able to complete Microsoft's makeover after Steve Ballmer's insipid tenure at the helm.

Microsoft's Build conference is the perfect platform for Nadella to share his wisdom about the company, industry, and changes going forward.

In an age where tech CEOs thrive off of smoke and mirrors, Nadella was succinct conveying the concept of trust as the secret sauce that will help tech's digital footprint expand into new territories.

Trust infused products through the cloud and A.I. will be the perfect archetype of future tech that will encourage accelerated adoption rates.

A.I. was the message of the day at the Build conference. Nadella used the term A.I. 14 times and the word cloud four times when interviewed.

It was fitting that Microsoft wowed the audience with a sparkly, new-fangled demo.

The demo put on by Microsoft in conjunction with Amazon's (AMZN) Alexa showed smart-assistants working in collaboration.

Microsoft showed how it is possible to use a PC Windows desktop to order an Uber car through Amazon's Alexa.

This technology is very powerful and is a work-around for the "walled garden" problem where big companies are closing off their systems only to proprietary software and products limiting upside potential.

The ability to collaborate with multiple A.I. smart systems will generate a whole new layer of business catering toward the communication and business developments among A.I. systems.

Nadella also offered extended examples of A.I. applications, for instance, the capability of detecting cracks in an oil pipeline and running recognition software through a drone using a Qualcomm (QCOM) manufactured camera to monitor the state of containers.

Trusting A.I. will expedite the usage of A.I. business applications, and the companies diverting capital into A.I. enhancement will reap from what they sow.

The knock-on effect is that university A.I. staff members are being poached faster than a breakfast egg. There is a bidding war going on as we speak from both sides of the Pacific.

Facebook is opening new A.I. research centers in Seattle and Pittsburgh.

Previously, A.I. was a buzzword and companies would trot out a visually stimulating display with pizzazz. But that is all changing with A.I. swiftly moving into the backbone of all business operations.

Ottomatika, a company that develops software for autonomous cars acquired by Aptiv (APTV), was entirely a Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) in-house project that was picked up by Aptiv for commercial applications.

In one fell swoop, (CMU) lost a whole team of leading A.I. researchers.

Microsoft is a premium stock because it straddles both sides of the fence.

On one side, it's an uber growth company with Microsoft Azure growing 93% YOY satisfying investors requirement for insatiable growth.

On the other hand, Microsoft is robustly lucrative profiting $21.20 billion in 2017, and would be a Warren Buffett-type of cash flow reliant stock even though he has smothered any inkling of buying Microsoft shares because of his close relationship with co-founder Bill Gates.

Even Microsoft's legacy product Microsoft Office 365 is a gangbuster segment swelling 42% YOY.

This contrasts with other legacy companies that are attempting to wean themselves from their own outdated products.

Office 365 products are still embedded in daily life, and I am using it now to type this story.

On the technical side of it, Microsoft is beefing up its developer tools.

Microsoft will integrate Kubernetes, an open-source system for automating deployment, into the Azure as well as upping its Azure Bot Service adding 100 new features.

There are more than 300,000 developers who operate the Azure Bot Service alone.

The slew of upgrades for developers will enhance the power of Microsoft's software and ecosystem.

The overarching theme to the Build conference is the integration of A.I. into real life business applications and the importance of the cloud.

Now the Cloud.

Nadella reaffirmed Microsoft's position in the cloud wars characterizing the current environment as a duo of Amazon and Microsoft with Google trailing behind.

Microsoft has the potential to nick Amazon's position as the industry's cloud leader because of the unique set of products it can combine with the cloud.

Most of the world utilizes a mix of PC-based hardware, using Microsoft's software and operating system, supplemented by an Android-based smartphone.

As expected, Microsoft, Alphabet (GOOGL), and Amazon are spending a pretty penny advancing their cloud business.

Microsoft spends more than $1 billion per month on Azure cloud data centers.

This number now surpasses the entire annual Microsoft R&D budget.

In the interview, Nadella cited that Microsoft now has 50 domestic data centers.

Amazon habitually holds between 50,000 to 80,000 servers at each data center. Extrapolate the lower range of the number with 50 data centers and Microsoft could have at least 2.5 million servers working for its data needs.

The barriers of entry have never been higher in the cloud industry because the costs are spiraling out of control.

Few people have billions upon billions to make this business work at the appropriate scale.

Tom Keane, head of Global Infrastructure at Microsoft Azure, recently said that Azure meets 58 compliance requirements set forth by the federal government, industry, and local players.

Azure is the first cloud that satisfies the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement criteria for contractors to handle Department of Defense work.

Regulation has emerged as one of the controversial issues of 2018, and this did not get lost in the shuffle.

The trust comment was clearly a thinly veiled swipe against Facebook's (FB) much frowned upon business model, making it commonplace these days for prominent CEOs to distance themselves from Mark Zuckerberg's creation.

Protecting a company's image and reputation is paramount in the new rigid era of big data.

Nadella's anti-Facebook rhetoric continued by noting the auction-based pricing standards are "funky," explaining the model is counterintuitive. His reason was that as demand increases, the price should drop and not rise.

Apple (AAPL) CEO Tim Cook has largely been negative about Facebook's tactics. The fury is justified when you consider Apple and Microsoft hustle industriously to develop software and hardware products while Facebook manipulates user data to profit from collected data. A nice shortcut if there ever was one.

It's clear that Apple and Microsoft have no interest in giving third parties access to personal data because the leadership understands it is a slippery slope to go down and unsustainable.

Nadella's emphasis on tech ethics is a breath of fresh air and the data Microsoft accumulates is used to improve the cloud and software products rather than pedal to mercenaries.

The companies that have staying power create proprietary products that cannot be replicated.

Microsoft's assortment of software products acts as the perfect gateway into the cloud and is a moat widening tool.

A.I. and the cloud are all you need to know, and Microsoft is at the heart of this revolutionary movement.

Any weakness of Microsoft's shares into the low-90s is a screaming buy.

 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Quote of the Day

"Innovation has nothing to do with how many R&D dollars you have. When Apple came up with the Mac, IBM was spending at least 100 times more on R&D. It's not about money. It's about the people you have, how you're led, and how much you get it." - said Apple cofounder Steve Jobs.

 

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-05-09 01:05:572018-05-09 01:05:57Here's the Top Stock in the Market to Buy Today
MHFTR

May 8, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
May 8, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(BUFFETT GOES ALL IN WITH APPLE),
(SNAP), (WDC), (GOOGL), (AMZN),
(CRM), (RHT), (HPQ), (FB), (AAPL)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-05-08 01:06:572018-05-08 01:06:57May 8, 2018
MHFTR

Buffett Goes All In With Apple

Tech Letter

Not every stock comes with Warren Buffett's confession that he would like to own 100% of it. But, of course that stock would have to be a tech stock.

As it stands, the Oracle of Omaha owns 5% of Apple (AAPL), and his confession is still a bold statement for someone who seldom forays outside his comfort zone.

Buffett also continues to concede that he "missed" Google (GOOGL) and Amazon (AMZN).

What a revelation!

The outflow of superlatives invading the airwaves is indicative of the strength technology has assumed in the bull market.

The tech sector has been coping with obstacles such as higher interest rates, trade wars, data regulation, IP chaos, and the globalization backlash.

However, the tech companies have come through unscathed and hungry for more.

Their power is not contained to one industry, and techs' capabilities have been spilling over into other sectors digitizing legacy industries.

Every CEO is cognizant that enhancing a product means blending the right amount of tech to suit its needs.

It is not halcyon times in all of tech land either.

There have been some companies that have faltered or were naturally cannibalized by other tech companies that disrupt business.

Times are ruthless and this is just the beginning.

There will be winners and losers as with most other secular paradigm shifts.

Particularly, there are two types of losers that investors need to avoid like the plague.

The first is the prototypical tech company hawking legacy products such as Western Digital Corp. (WDC) that I have been banging on the table telling investors not to buy the stock.

The lion's share of revenue is still in the antiquated hard drive business that has a one-way ticket to obsolescence.

Yes, they are turning around product mixes to factor in its pivot to solid state drives (SSD), but they are late to the game and deservedly punished for it.

Compare WDC to companies that have completed the transition from legacy reliance to the cloud, and it is simple to understand that companies such as Microsoft, which struggled for years to turn around with CEO Satya Nadella, finally can claim victory.

The problem with WDC is the stock's price action performs miserably because the company is tagged as an ongoing turnaround story.

On the other hand, headliner cloud plays experience breathtaking gaps up due to the strength of the cloud such as Amazon (AMZN), Red Hat (RHT), and Salesforce (CRM), just to name a few.

To pour fuel on the fire, speculative reports citing NAND chip price "softening" beat down the stock into submission.

Effectively, legacy companies become sell the rallies type of stocks.

Transforming a legacy company into a high-octane cloud company is perilous to say the least. Jeff Bezos recently gloated that Amazon Web Service's (AWS) seven-year head start is all investors need to know about the cloud. There is some merit to his statement.

Examples are rife with bad executive decisions by legacy companies such as HP Inc. (HPQ), another legacy tech company that makes computers and hardware. It ventured out to buy Palm for $1.2 billion plus debt after a bidding war with legacy competitor Dell in 2010.

In 1996, the Palm PDA (Personal Digital Assistant) was the first smart phone on the market that predated BlackBerry's smart phone with the full keyboard made by RIM (Research in Motion).

The demise of Palm emerged from a hodgepodge of mismanagement, failed spin-offs, misplaced mergers, and resource wastefulness even with the preeminent technology of its time.

(HPQ)'s stab at the smartphone market resulted in purchasing Palm. However, after heavy selling pressure in its shares, HP shut down this division and sold off the remaining technology to Chinese electronics company TCL Corporation.

The sad truth is many transformations fail at step one, and there is no guarantee a newly absorbed business will perform as expected.

RIM, now changed to BlackBerry (BB), soon found out how it felt to be Palm when Steve Jobs dropped the first iPhone on the market, and the world has never been the same.

(BB) gradually morphed into an autonomous vehicle technology company after the writing was on the wall.

The other types of losers are companies with inferior business models such as Snapchat (SNAP), which I have written about extensively from the bearish side.

In an age where disruptors are being disrupted by other disruptors, CEOs must live in fear that their business will get undercut and hijacked at any time.

Instagram, a subsidiary of Facebook (FB), has permanently borrowed numerous features from Snapchat. Its Instagram "stories" feature is now used by more than 300 million daily users.

Snapchat is serving as Instagram's guinea pig while CEO Evan Spiegel finds an alternative way to survive against Facebook's unlimited resources.

Both are in the game of selling ads and nobody does it better than Facebook and Alphabet or has the degree of scale.

The recent redesign was met with a chorus of universal boos. The 60 minutes I spent testing the new design reconfirmed my fears that the new design was an unmitigated washout.

In short, Snap's redesign seemed like a different app and became incredibly difficult to use.

Compounding the deteriorating situation, Snapchat laid off 120 engineers due to sub-par performance and withheld last year's performance bonuses even though co-founder Evan Spiegel received $637 million in 2017.

The latest earnings report was a catastrophe.

Daily active user (DAU) growth, the most sought out metric for Snapchat, failed to deliver the goods. The street expected 194.2 million DAU and Snap reported 191 million. A miss of 3.2 million users and a deceleration of growth QOQ.

Remember that Snapchat is substantially smaller than Instagram and should have no problems surpassing expectations on a smaller scale, thus investors voted with their feet and bailed on the stock after the catatonic performance last quarter.

Instagram is six times larger with more than 800 million users as of the end of 2017.

Top line fell short of expectations and average revenue per user (ARPU) dropped to $1.21, far less than the expected $1.27.

The less than stellar redesign faced a rebellion from long-term Snapchat disciples. More than 1.2 million Snap diehards signed a petition hoping to revert back to the old interface, and its updated ratings in Apple's app store has fallen to 1.6 stars out of 5.

Then the perpetual question of why would advertisers want to pay for Snapchat digital ads when they earn more by buying Instagram ads?

This remains unsolved and appears unsolvable.

Snapchat is befuddled by the pecking order and the company is on a train to nowhere.

To hammer the nail in the coffin, Snapchat announced to investors that it expects revenue to "decelerate substantially" next quarter.

In an era where technology companies will lead the economy and stock market, and has an outsized influence in politics and culture, not all tech companies are one-foot tap-ins.

Investors need to separate the wheat from the chaff or risk losing their shirt.

 

 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Quote of the Day

"We have to stop optimizing for programmers and start optimizing for users." - said American software developer Jeff Atwood

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Quarterly-Average-Daily-Active-Users-image-3-e1525727102446.jpg 319 580 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-05-08 01:05:022018-05-08 01:05:02Buffett Goes All In With Apple
MHFTR

April 25, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 25, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(FANGS DELIVER ON EARNINGS, BUT FAIL ON PRICE ACTION),

(GOOGL), (AMZN), (MSFT), (AAPL), (FB),
(DBX), (NFLX), (BOX), (WDC)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-04-25 01:06:532018-04-25 01:06:53April 25, 2018
Page 103 of 111«‹101102103104105›»

tastytrade, Inc. (“tastytrade”) has entered into a Marketing Agreement with Mad Hedge Fund Trader (“Marketing Agent”) whereby tastytrade pays compensation to Marketing Agent to recommend tastytrade’s brokerage services. The existence of this Marketing Agreement should not be deemed as an endorsement or recommendation of Marketing Agent by tastytrade and/or any of its affiliated companies. Neither tastytrade nor any of its affiliated companies is responsible for the privacy practices of Marketing Agent or this website. tastytrade does not warrant the accuracy or content of the products or services offered by Marketing Agent or this website. Marketing Agent is independent and is not an affiliate of tastytrade. 

Legal Disclaimer

There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.

Copyright © 2025. Mad Hedge Fund Trader. All Rights Reserved. support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • FAQ
Scroll to top