• support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Member Login
Mad Hedge Fund Trader
  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Luncheons
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Tag Archive for: (AAPL)

MHFTR

Here's the Top Stock in the Market to Buy Today

Tech Letter

When the CEO of Microsoft, Satya Nadella, sits down for a candid interview, I move mountains then cross heaven and hell to listen to him, and you should, too.

Microsoft is at the top of my list as a conviction buy.

Nadella is one of the great CEOs of our time and was able to complete Microsoft's makeover after Steve Ballmer's insipid tenure at the helm.

Microsoft's Build conference is the perfect platform for Nadella to share his wisdom about the company, industry, and changes going forward.

In an age where tech CEOs thrive off of smoke and mirrors, Nadella was succinct conveying the concept of trust as the secret sauce that will help tech's digital footprint expand into new territories.

Trust infused products through the cloud and A.I. will be the perfect archetype of future tech that will encourage accelerated adoption rates.

A.I. was the message of the day at the Build conference. Nadella used the term A.I. 14 times and the word cloud four times when interviewed.

It was fitting that Microsoft wowed the audience with a sparkly, new-fangled demo.

The demo put on by Microsoft in conjunction with Amazon's (AMZN) Alexa showed smart-assistants working in collaboration.

Microsoft showed how it is possible to use a PC Windows desktop to order an Uber car through Amazon's Alexa.

This technology is very powerful and is a work-around for the "walled garden" problem where big companies are closing off their systems only to proprietary software and products limiting upside potential.

The ability to collaborate with multiple A.I. smart systems will generate a whole new layer of business catering toward the communication and business developments among A.I. systems.

Nadella also offered extended examples of A.I. applications, for instance, the capability of detecting cracks in an oil pipeline and running recognition software through a drone using a Qualcomm (QCOM) manufactured camera to monitor the state of containers.

Trusting A.I. will expedite the usage of A.I. business applications, and the companies diverting capital into A.I. enhancement will reap from what they sow.

The knock-on effect is that university A.I. staff members are being poached faster than a breakfast egg. There is a bidding war going on as we speak from both sides of the Pacific.

Facebook is opening new A.I. research centers in Seattle and Pittsburgh.

Previously, A.I. was a buzzword and companies would trot out a visually stimulating display with pizzazz. But that is all changing with A.I. swiftly moving into the backbone of all business operations.

Ottomatika, a company that develops software for autonomous cars acquired by Aptiv (APTV), was entirely a Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) in-house project that was picked up by Aptiv for commercial applications.

In one fell swoop, (CMU) lost a whole team of leading A.I. researchers.

Microsoft is a premium stock because it straddles both sides of the fence.

On one side, it's an uber growth company with Microsoft Azure growing 93% YOY satisfying investors requirement for insatiable growth.

On the other hand, Microsoft is robustly lucrative profiting $21.20 billion in 2017, and would be a Warren Buffett-type of cash flow reliant stock even though he has smothered any inkling of buying Microsoft shares because of his close relationship with co-founder Bill Gates.

Even Microsoft's legacy product Microsoft Office 365 is a gangbuster segment swelling 42% YOY.

This contrasts with other legacy companies that are attempting to wean themselves from their own outdated products.

Office 365 products are still embedded in daily life, and I am using it now to type this story.

On the technical side of it, Microsoft is beefing up its developer tools.

Microsoft will integrate Kubernetes, an open-source system for automating deployment, into the Azure as well as upping its Azure Bot Service adding 100 new features.

There are more than 300,000 developers who operate the Azure Bot Service alone.

The slew of upgrades for developers will enhance the power of Microsoft's software and ecosystem.

The overarching theme to the Build conference is the integration of A.I. into real life business applications and the importance of the cloud.

Now the Cloud.

Nadella reaffirmed Microsoft's position in the cloud wars characterizing the current environment as a duo of Amazon and Microsoft with Google trailing behind.

Microsoft has the potential to nick Amazon's position as the industry's cloud leader because of the unique set of products it can combine with the cloud.

Most of the world utilizes a mix of PC-based hardware, using Microsoft's software and operating system, supplemented by an Android-based smartphone.

As expected, Microsoft, Alphabet (GOOGL), and Amazon are spending a pretty penny advancing their cloud business.

Microsoft spends more than $1 billion per month on Azure cloud data centers.

This number now surpasses the entire annual Microsoft R&D budget.

In the interview, Nadella cited that Microsoft now has 50 domestic data centers.

Amazon habitually holds between 50,000 to 80,000 servers at each data center. Extrapolate the lower range of the number with 50 data centers and Microsoft could have at least 2.5 million servers working for its data needs.

The barriers of entry have never been higher in the cloud industry because the costs are spiraling out of control.

Few people have billions upon billions to make this business work at the appropriate scale.

Tom Keane, head of Global Infrastructure at Microsoft Azure, recently said that Azure meets 58 compliance requirements set forth by the federal government, industry, and local players.

Azure is the first cloud that satisfies the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement criteria for contractors to handle Department of Defense work.

Regulation has emerged as one of the controversial issues of 2018, and this did not get lost in the shuffle.

The trust comment was clearly a thinly veiled swipe against Facebook's (FB) much frowned upon business model, making it commonplace these days for prominent CEOs to distance themselves from Mark Zuckerberg's creation.

Protecting a company's image and reputation is paramount in the new rigid era of big data.

Nadella's anti-Facebook rhetoric continued by noting the auction-based pricing standards are "funky," explaining the model is counterintuitive. His reason was that as demand increases, the price should drop and not rise.

Apple (AAPL) CEO Tim Cook has largely been negative about Facebook's tactics. The fury is justified when you consider Apple and Microsoft hustle industriously to develop software and hardware products while Facebook manipulates user data to profit from collected data. A nice shortcut if there ever was one.

It's clear that Apple and Microsoft have no interest in giving third parties access to personal data because the leadership understands it is a slippery slope to go down and unsustainable.

Nadella's emphasis on tech ethics is a breath of fresh air and the data Microsoft accumulates is used to improve the cloud and software products rather than pedal to mercenaries.

The companies that have staying power create proprietary products that cannot be replicated.

Microsoft's assortment of software products acts as the perfect gateway into the cloud and is a moat widening tool.

A.I. and the cloud are all you need to know, and Microsoft is at the heart of this revolutionary movement.

Any weakness of Microsoft's shares into the low-90s is a screaming buy.

 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Quote of the Day

"Innovation has nothing to do with how many R&D dollars you have. When Apple came up with the Mac, IBM was spending at least 100 times more on R&D. It's not about money. It's about the people you have, how you're led, and how much you get it." - said Apple cofounder Steve Jobs.

 

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-05-09 01:05:572018-05-09 01:05:57Here's the Top Stock in the Market to Buy Today
MHFTR

May 8, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
May 8, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(BUFFETT GOES ALL IN WITH APPLE),
(SNAP), (WDC), (GOOGL), (AMZN),
(CRM), (RHT), (HPQ), (FB), (AAPL)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-05-08 01:06:572018-05-08 01:06:57May 8, 2018
MHFTR

Buffett Goes All In With Apple

Tech Letter

Not every stock comes with Warren Buffett's confession that he would like to own 100% of it. But, of course that stock would have to be a tech stock.

As it stands, the Oracle of Omaha owns 5% of Apple (AAPL), and his confession is still a bold statement for someone who seldom forays outside his comfort zone.

Buffett also continues to concede that he "missed" Google (GOOGL) and Amazon (AMZN).

What a revelation!

The outflow of superlatives invading the airwaves is indicative of the strength technology has assumed in the bull market.

The tech sector has been coping with obstacles such as higher interest rates, trade wars, data regulation, IP chaos, and the globalization backlash.

However, the tech companies have come through unscathed and hungry for more.

Their power is not contained to one industry, and techs' capabilities have been spilling over into other sectors digitizing legacy industries.

Every CEO is cognizant that enhancing a product means blending the right amount of tech to suit its needs.

It is not halcyon times in all of tech land either.

There have been some companies that have faltered or were naturally cannibalized by other tech companies that disrupt business.

Times are ruthless and this is just the beginning.

There will be winners and losers as with most other secular paradigm shifts.

Particularly, there are two types of losers that investors need to avoid like the plague.

The first is the prototypical tech company hawking legacy products such as Western Digital Corp. (WDC) that I have been banging on the table telling investors not to buy the stock.

The lion's share of revenue is still in the antiquated hard drive business that has a one-way ticket to obsolescence.

Yes, they are turning around product mixes to factor in its pivot to solid state drives (SSD), but they are late to the game and deservedly punished for it.

Compare WDC to companies that have completed the transition from legacy reliance to the cloud, and it is simple to understand that companies such as Microsoft, which struggled for years to turn around with CEO Satya Nadella, finally can claim victory.

The problem with WDC is the stock's price action performs miserably because the company is tagged as an ongoing turnaround story.

On the other hand, headliner cloud plays experience breathtaking gaps up due to the strength of the cloud such as Amazon (AMZN), Red Hat (RHT), and Salesforce (CRM), just to name a few.

To pour fuel on the fire, speculative reports citing NAND chip price "softening" beat down the stock into submission.

Effectively, legacy companies become sell the rallies type of stocks.

Transforming a legacy company into a high-octane cloud company is perilous to say the least. Jeff Bezos recently gloated that Amazon Web Service's (AWS) seven-year head start is all investors need to know about the cloud. There is some merit to his statement.

Examples are rife with bad executive decisions by legacy companies such as HP Inc. (HPQ), another legacy tech company that makes computers and hardware. It ventured out to buy Palm for $1.2 billion plus debt after a bidding war with legacy competitor Dell in 2010.

In 1996, the Palm PDA (Personal Digital Assistant) was the first smart phone on the market that predated BlackBerry's smart phone with the full keyboard made by RIM (Research in Motion).

The demise of Palm emerged from a hodgepodge of mismanagement, failed spin-offs, misplaced mergers, and resource wastefulness even with the preeminent technology of its time.

(HPQ)'s stab at the smartphone market resulted in purchasing Palm. However, after heavy selling pressure in its shares, HP shut down this division and sold off the remaining technology to Chinese electronics company TCL Corporation.

The sad truth is many transformations fail at step one, and there is no guarantee a newly absorbed business will perform as expected.

RIM, now changed to BlackBerry (BB), soon found out how it felt to be Palm when Steve Jobs dropped the first iPhone on the market, and the world has never been the same.

(BB) gradually morphed into an autonomous vehicle technology company after the writing was on the wall.

The other types of losers are companies with inferior business models such as Snapchat (SNAP), which I have written about extensively from the bearish side.

In an age where disruptors are being disrupted by other disruptors, CEOs must live in fear that their business will get undercut and hijacked at any time.

Instagram, a subsidiary of Facebook (FB), has permanently borrowed numerous features from Snapchat. Its Instagram "stories" feature is now used by more than 300 million daily users.

Snapchat is serving as Instagram's guinea pig while CEO Evan Spiegel finds an alternative way to survive against Facebook's unlimited resources.

Both are in the game of selling ads and nobody does it better than Facebook and Alphabet or has the degree of scale.

The recent redesign was met with a chorus of universal boos. The 60 minutes I spent testing the new design reconfirmed my fears that the new design was an unmitigated washout.

In short, Snap's redesign seemed like a different app and became incredibly difficult to use.

Compounding the deteriorating situation, Snapchat laid off 120 engineers due to sub-par performance and withheld last year's performance bonuses even though co-founder Evan Spiegel received $637 million in 2017.

The latest earnings report was a catastrophe.

Daily active user (DAU) growth, the most sought out metric for Snapchat, failed to deliver the goods. The street expected 194.2 million DAU and Snap reported 191 million. A miss of 3.2 million users and a deceleration of growth QOQ.

Remember that Snapchat is substantially smaller than Instagram and should have no problems surpassing expectations on a smaller scale, thus investors voted with their feet and bailed on the stock after the catatonic performance last quarter.

Instagram is six times larger with more than 800 million users as of the end of 2017.

Top line fell short of expectations and average revenue per user (ARPU) dropped to $1.21, far less than the expected $1.27.

The less than stellar redesign faced a rebellion from long-term Snapchat disciples. More than 1.2 million Snap diehards signed a petition hoping to revert back to the old interface, and its updated ratings in Apple's app store has fallen to 1.6 stars out of 5.

Then the perpetual question of why would advertisers want to pay for Snapchat digital ads when they earn more by buying Instagram ads?

This remains unsolved and appears unsolvable.

Snapchat is befuddled by the pecking order and the company is on a train to nowhere.

To hammer the nail in the coffin, Snapchat announced to investors that it expects revenue to "decelerate substantially" next quarter.

In an era where technology companies will lead the economy and stock market, and has an outsized influence in politics and culture, not all tech companies are one-foot tap-ins.

Investors need to separate the wheat from the chaff or risk losing their shirt.

 

 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Quote of the Day

"We have to stop optimizing for programmers and start optimizing for users." - said American software developer Jeff Atwood

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Quarterly-Average-Daily-Active-Users-image-3-e1525727102446.jpg 319 580 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-05-08 01:05:022018-05-08 01:05:02Buffett Goes All In With Apple
MHFTR

April 25, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 25, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(FANGS DELIVER ON EARNINGS, BUT FAIL ON PRICE ACTION),

(GOOGL), (AMZN), (MSFT), (AAPL), (FB),
(DBX), (NFLX), (BOX), (WDC)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-04-25 01:06:532018-04-25 01:06:53April 25, 2018
MHFTR

FANGs Deliver on Earnings, But Fail on Price Action

Tech Letter

Alphabet (GOOGL) did a great job alleviating fears that large-cap tech would be dragged through the mud and fading earnings would dishearten investors.

The major takeaways from the recent deluge of tech earnings are large-cap tech is getting better at what they do best, and the biggest are getting decisively bigger.

Of the 26% rise to $31.1 billion in Alphabet's quarterly revenue, more than $26 billion was concentrated around its mammoth digital ad revenue business.

Alphabet, even though rebranded to express a diverse portfolio of assets, is still very much reliant on its ad revenue to carry the load made possible by Google search.

Its "other bets" category failed to impact the bottom line with loss-making speculative projects such as Nest Labs in charge of mounting a battle against Amazon's (AMZN) Alexa.

The quandary in this battle is the margins Alphabet will surrender to seize a portion of the future smart home market.

What we are seeing is a case of strength fueling further strength.

Alphabet did a lot to smooth over fears that government regulation would put a dent in its business model, asserting that it has been preparing for the new EU privacy rules for "18 months" and its search ad business will not be materially affected by these new standards.

CFO Ruth Porat emphasized the shift to mobile, as mobile growth is leading the charge due to Internet users' migration to mobile platforms.

Google search remains an unrivaled product that transcends culture, language, and society at optimal levels.

Sure, there are other online search engines out there, but the accuracy of results pale in comparison to the preeminent first-class operation at Google search.

Alphabet does not divulge revenue details about its cloud unit. However, the cloud unit is dropped into the "other revenues" category, which also includes hardware sales and posted close to $4.4 billion, up 36% YOY.

Although the cloud segment will never dwarf its premier digital ad segment, if Alphabet can ameliorate its cloud engine into a $10 billion per quarter segment, investors would dance in the streets with delight.

Another problem with the FANGs is that they are one-trick ponies. And if those ponies ever got locked up in the barn, it would spell imminent disaster.

Apple (AAPL) is trying its best to diversify away from the iconic product with which consumers identify.

The iPhone company is ramping up its services and subscription business to combat waning iPhone demand.

Alphabet is charging hard into the autonomous ride-sharing business seizing a leadership position.

Netflix (NFLX) is doubling down on what it already does great - create top-level original content.

This was after it shed its DVD business in the early stages after CEO Reed Hastings identified its imminent implosion.

Tech companies habitually display flexibility and nimbleness of which big corporations dream.

One of the few negatives in an otherwise solid earnings report was the TAC (traffic acquisition costs) reported at $6.28 billion, which make up 24% of total revenue.

An escalation of TAC as a percentage of revenue is certainly a risk factor for the digital ad business. But nibbling away at margins is not the end of the world, and the digital ad business will remain highly profitable moving forward.

TAC comprised 22% of revenue in Q1 2017, and the rise in costs reflects that mobile ads are priced at a premium.

Google noted that TAC will experience further pricing pressure because of the great leap toward mobile devices, but the pace of price increases will recede.

The increased cost of luring new eyeballs will not diminish FANGs' earnings report buttressed by secular trends that pervade Silicon Valley's platforms.

The year of the cloud has positive implications for Alphabet. It ranks No. 3 in the cloud industry behind Microsoft (MSFT) and Amazon.

Amazon and Microsoft announce earnings later this week. The robust cloud segments should easily reaffirm the bullish sentiment in tech stocks.

Amazon's earnings call could provide clarity on the bizarre backbiting emanating from the White House, even though Jeff Bezos rarely frequents the earnings call.

A thinly veiled or bold response would comfort investors because rumors of tech peaking would add immediate downside pressure to equities.

The wider-reaching short-term problem is the macro headwinds that could knock over tech's position on top of the equity pedestal and bring it back down to reality in a war of diplomatic rhetoric and international tariffs.

Google, Facebook, and Netflix are the least affected FANGs because they have been locked out of the Chinese market for years.

The Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud arm of Amazon blew past cloud revenue estimates of 42% last quarter by registering a 45% jump in revenue.

Microsoft reiterated that immense cloud growth permeating through the industry, expanding 99% QOQ.

I expect repeat performances from the best cloud plays in the industry.

Any cloud firm growing under 20% is not even worth a look since the bull case for cloud revenue revolves around a minimum of 20% growth QOQ.

Amazon still boasts around 30% market share in the cloud space with Microsoft staking 15% but gaining each quarter.

AWS growth has been stunted for the past nine quarters as competition and cybersecurity costs related to patches erode margins.

Above all else, the one company that investors can pinpoint with margin problems is Amazon, which abandoned margin strength for market share years ago and that investors approved in droves.

AWS is the key driver of profits that allows Amazon to fund its e-commerce business.

Cloud adoption is still in the early stages.

Microsoft Azure and Google have a chance to catch up to AWS. There will be ample opportunity for these players to leverage existing infrastructure and expertise to rival AWS's strength.

As the recent IPO performance suggests, there is nothing hotter than this narrow sliver of tech, and this is all happening with numerous companies losing vast amounts of money such as Dropbox (DBX) and Box (BOX).

Microsoft has been inching toward gross profits of $8 billion per quarter and has been profitable for years.

And now it has a hyper-expanding cloud division to boot.

Any macro sell-off that pulls down Microsoft to around the $90 level or if Alphabet dips below $1,000, these would be great entry points into the core pillars of the equity market.

If tech goes, so will everything else.

If it plays its cards right, Microsoft Azure has the tools in place to overtake AWS.

Shorting cloud companies is a difficult proposition because the leg ups are legendary.

If traders are looking for any tech shorts to pile into, then focus on the legacy companies that lack a cloud growth driver.

Another cue would be a company that has not completed the resuscitation process yet, such as Western Digital (WDC) whose shares have traded sideways for the past year.

But for now, as the 10-year interest rate shoots past 3%, investors should bide their time as cheaper entry points will shortly appear.

 

 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________________________________________

Quote of the Day

"Technology is a word that describes something that doesn't work yet." - said British author Douglas Adams.

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/FANG-Y-Charts-image-4.jpg 335 576 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-04-25 01:05:312018-04-25 01:05:31FANGs Deliver on Earnings, But Fail on Price Action
MHFTR

April 24, 2018

Diary, Newsletter

Global Market Comments
April 24, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(DON'T MISS THE APRIL 25 GLOBAL STRATEGY WEBINAR),
(MONDAY, JUNE 11, FORT WORTH, TEXAS, GLOBAL STRATEGY LUNCHEON)
(WHY INDEXERS ARE TOAST),
(VIX), (VXX), (SPY), (AAPL), (HACK),

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-04-24 01:09:542018-04-24 01:09:54April 24, 2018
MHFTR

Why Indexers Are Toast

Diary, Newsletter, Research

Hardly a day goes by without some market expert predicting that it's only a matter of time before machines completely take over the stock market.

Humans are about to be tossed into the dustbin of history.

Recently, money management giant BlackRock, with a staggering $5.4 trillion in assets under management, announced that algorithms would take over a much larger share of the investment decision-making process.

Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) are adding fuel to the fire.

By moving capital out of single stocks and into baskets, you are also sucking the volatility, and the vitality out of the market.

This is true whether money is moving into the $237 billion S&P 500 (SPY), or the miniscule $1 billion PureFunds ISE Cyber Security ETF (HACK), which holds only 30 individual names.

The problem is being greatly exacerbated by the recent explosive growth of the ETF industry.

In the past five years, the total amount of capital committed to ETFs has doubled to more than $3 trillion, while the number of ETFs has soared to well over 2,000.

In fact, there is now more money committed to ETFs than publicly listed single stocks!

While many individual investors say they are moving into ETFs to save on commissions and expenses, in fact, the opposite is true.

You just don't see them.

They are buried away in wide-dealing spreads and operating expenses buried deeply in prospectuses.

The net effect of the ETF industry is to greatly enhance Wall Street's take from their brokerage business, i.e., from YOU.

Every wonder why the shares of the big banks are REALLY trading at new multi-year highs?

I hate to say this, but I've seen this movie before.

Whenever a strategy becomes popular, it carries with it the seeds of its own destruction.

The most famous scare was the "Portfolio Insurance" of the 1980s, a proprietary formula sold to institutional investors that allegedly protected them by automatically selling in down markets.

Of course, once everyone was in the boat, the end result was the 1987 crash, which saw the Dow Average plunge 20% in one day.

The net effect was to maximize everyone's short positions at absolute market bottoms.

A lot of former portfolio managers started driving Yellow Cabs after that one!

I'll give you another example.

Until 2007, every computer model in the financial industry said that real estate prices only went up.

Trillions of dollars of derivative securities were sold based on this assumption.

However, all of these models relied on only 50 years' worth of data dating back to the immediate postwar era.

Hello subprime crisis!

If their data had gone back 70 years, it would have included the Great Depression.

The superior models would have added one extra proviso - that real estate can collapse by 90% at any time, without warning, and then stay down for a decade.

The derivate securities based on THIS more accurate assumption would have been priced much, much more expensively.

And here is the basic problem.

As soon as money enters a strategy, it changes the behavior of that strategy.

The more money that enters, the more that strategy changes, to the point where it produces the opposite of the promised outcome.

Strategies that attract only $10 million market-wide can make 50% a year returns or better.

But try and execute with $1 billion, and the identical strategies lose money. Guess what happens at $1 trillion?

This is why high frequency traders can't grow beyond their current small size on a capitalized basis, even though they account for 70% of all trading.

I speak from experience.

During the 1980s I used a strategy called "Japanese Equity Warrant Arbitrage," which generated a risk-free return of 30% a year or more.

This was back when overnight Japanese yen interest rates were at 6%, and you could buy Japanese equity warrants at parity with 5:1 leverage (5 X 6 = 30).

When there were only a tiny handful of us trading these arcane securities, we all made fortunes. Every other East End London kid was driving a new Ferrari (yes, David, that's you!).

At its peak in 1989, the strategy probably employed 10,000 people to execute and clear in London, Tokyo, and New York.

However, once the Japanese stock market crash began in earnest, liquidity in the necessary instruments vaporized, and the strategy became a huge loser.

The entire business shut down within two years. Enter several thousand new Yellow Cab drivers.

All of this means that the current indexing fad is setting up for a giant fall.

Except that this time, many managers are going to have to become Uber drivers instead.

Computers are great at purely quantitative analysis based on historical data.

Throw emotion in there anywhere, and the quants are toast.

And, at the end of the day, markets are made up of high emotional human beings who want to get rich, brag to their friends, and argue with their spouses.

In fact, the demise has already started.

Look no further than investment performance so far in 2018.

The (SPY) is up a scant 0% this year.

Amazon (AAPL), on the other hand, one of the most widely owned stocks in the world, is up an eye-popping 30%.

If you DON'T own Amazon, you basically don't HAVE any performance to report for 2017.

I'll tell you my conclusion to all of this.

Use a combination of algorithms AND personal judgment, and you will come out a winner, as I do. It also helps to have 50 years of trading experience.

You have to know when to tell your algorithm a firm "NO."

While your algo may be telling you to "BUY" ahead of a monthly Nonfarm Payroll Report or a presidential election, you may not sleep at night if you do so.

This is how I have been able to triple my own trading performance since 2015, taking my 2017 year-to-date to an enviable 20%.

It's not as good as being 30% invested in Amazon.

But it beats the pants off of any passive index all day long.

 

 

 

Yup, This is a Passive Investor

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-04-24 01:06:262018-04-24 01:06:26Why Indexers Are Toast
MHFTR

April 23, 2018

Diary, Newsletter

Global Market Comments
April 23, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(THE MARKET OUTLOOK FOR THE WEEK AHEAD, or HERE COMES THE FOUR HORSEMEN OF THE APOCALYPSE),
(SPY), (GOOGL), (TLT), (GLD), (AAPL), (VIX), (VXX), (C), (JPM),
(HOW TO AVOID PONZI SCHEMES),
(TESTIMONIAL)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-04-23 01:09:482018-04-23 15:44:04April 23, 2018
MHFTR

The Market Outlook for the Week Ahead, or Here Comes The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse

Diary, Newsletter, Research

Have you liked 2018 so far?

Good.

Because if you are an index player, you get to do it all over again. For the major stock indexes are now unchanged on the year. In effect, it is January 1 once more.

Unless of course you are a follower of the Mad Hedge Fund Trader. In that case, you are up an eye-popping 19.75% so far in 2018. But more on that later.

Last week we caught the first glimpse in this cycle of the investment Four Housemen of the Apocalypse. Interest rates are rising, the yield on the 10-year Treasury bond (TLT) reaching a four-year high at 2.96%. When we hit 3.00%, expect all hell to break loose.

The economic data is rolling over bit by bit, although it is more like a death by a thousand cuts than a major swoon. The heavy hand of major tariff increases for steel and aluminum is making itself felt. Chinese investment in the US is falling like a rock.

The duty on newsprint imports from Canada is about to put what's left of the newspaper business out of business. Gee, how did this industry get targeted above all others?

The dollar is weak (UUP), thanks to endless talk about trade wars.

Anecdotal evidence of inflation is everywhere. By this I mean that the price is rising for everything you have to buy, like your home, health care, college education, and website upgrades, while everything you want to sell, such as your own labor, is seeing the price fall.

We're not in a recession yet. Call this a pre-recession, which is a long-leading indicator of a stock market top. The real thing shouldn't show until late 2019 or 2020.

There was a kerfuffle over the outlook for Apple (AAPL) last week, which temporarily demolished the entire technology sector. iPhone sales estimates have been cut, and the parts pipeline has been drying up.

If you're a short-term trader, you should have sold your position in April 13 when I did. If you are a long-term investor, ignore it. You always get this kind of price action in between product cycles. I still see $200 a share in 2018. This too will pass.

This month, I have been busier than a one-armed paper hanger, sending out Trade Alerts across all asset classes almost every day.

Last week, I bought the Volatility Index (VXX) at the low, took profits in longs in gold (GLD), JP Morgan (JPM), Alphabet (GOOGL), and shorts in the US Treasury bond market (TLT), the S&P 500 (SPY), and the Volatility Index (VXX).

It is amazing how well that "buy low, sell high" thing works when you actually execute it. As a result, profits have been raining on the heads of Mad Hedge Trade Alert followers.

That brings April up to an amazing +12.99% profit, my 2018 year-to-date to +19.75%, my trailing one-year return to +56.09%, and my eight-year performance to a new all-time high of 296.22%. This brings my annualized return up to 35.55% since inception.

The last 14 consecutive Trade Alerts have been profitable. As for next week, I am going in with a net short position, with my stock longs in Alphabet (GOOGL) and Citigroup (C) fully hedged up.

And the best is yet to come!

I couldn't help but laugh when I heard that Republican House Speaker Paul Ryan announced his retirement in order to spend more time with his family. He must have the world's most unusual teenagers.

When I take my own teens out to lunch to visit with their friends, I have to sit on the opposite side of the restaurant, hide behind a newspaper, wear an oversized hat, and pretend I don't know them, even though the bill always mysteriously shows up on my table.

This will be FANG week on the earnings front, the most important of the quarter.

On Monday, April 23, at 10:00 AM, we get March Existing-Home Sales. Expect the Sohn Investment Conference in New York to suck up a lot of airtime. Alphabet (GOOGL) reports.

On Tuesday, April 24, at 8:30 AM EST, we receive the February S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller Home Price Index, which may see prices accelerate from the last 6.3% annual rate. Caterpillar (CAT) and Coca Cola (KO) report.

On Wednesday, April 25, at 2:00 PM, the weekly EIA Petroleum Statistics are out. Facebook (FB), Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), and Boeing (BA) report.

Thursday, April 26, leads with the Weekly Jobless Claims at 8:30 AM EST, which saw a fall of 9,000 last week. At the same time, we get March Durable Goods Orders. American Airlines (AAL), Raytheon (RTN), and KB Homes (KBH) report.

On Friday, April 27, at 8:30 AM EST, we get an early read on US Q1 GDP.

We get the Baker Hughes Rig Count at 1:00 PM EST. Last week brought an increase of 8. Chevron (CVX) reports.

As for me, I am going to take advantage of good weather in San Francisco and bike my way across the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge to Treasure Island.

Good Luck and Good Trading.

 

 

 

 

 

 

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Trailing-one-year-story-1-image-1-2-e1524264283463.jpg 384 580 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-04-23 01:08:102018-04-23 01:08:10The Market Outlook for the Week Ahead, or Here Comes The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
MHFTR

April 16, 2018

Diary, Newsletter

Global Market Comments
April 16, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(THE MARKET OUTLOOK FOR THE WEEK AHEAD, or THE WEEK THAT NOTHING HAPPENED),
(TLT), (GLD), (SPY), (QQQ), (USO), (UUP),
(VXX), (GOOGL), (JPM), (AAPL),
(HOW TO HANDLE THE FRIDAY, APRIL 20 OPTIONS EXPIRATION), (TLT), (VXX), (GOOGL), (JPM)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-04-16 01:08:332018-04-16 01:08:33April 16, 2018
Page 105 of 112«‹103104105106107›»

tastytrade, Inc. (“tastytrade”) has entered into a Marketing Agreement with Mad Hedge Fund Trader (“Marketing Agent”) whereby tastytrade pays compensation to Marketing Agent to recommend tastytrade’s brokerage services. The existence of this Marketing Agreement should not be deemed as an endorsement or recommendation of Marketing Agent by tastytrade and/or any of its affiliated companies. Neither tastytrade nor any of its affiliated companies is responsible for the privacy practices of Marketing Agent or this website. tastytrade does not warrant the accuracy or content of the products or services offered by Marketing Agent or this website. Marketing Agent is independent and is not an affiliate of tastytrade. 

Legal Disclaimer

There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.

Copyright © 2025. Mad Hedge Fund Trader. All Rights Reserved. support@madhedgefundtrader.com
Scroll to top