Global Market Comments
August 2, 2022
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(AN INSIDER’S GUIDE TO THE NEXT DECADE OF TECH INVESTMENT),
(AMZN), (AAPL), (NFLX), (AMD), (INTC), (TSLA), (GOOG), (META)
Global Market Comments
August 2, 2022
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(AN INSIDER’S GUIDE TO THE NEXT DECADE OF TECH INVESTMENT),
(AMZN), (AAPL), (NFLX), (AMD), (INTC), (TSLA), (GOOG), (META)
Last weekend, I had dinner with one of the oldest and best-performing technology managers in Silicon Valley. We met at a small out-of-the-way restaurant in Oakland near Jack London Square so no one would recognize us. It was blessed with a very wide sidewalk out front and plenty of patio tables.
The service was poor and the food indifferent, as are most dining experiences these days. I ordered via a QR code menu and paid with a touchless Square swipe.
I wanted to glean from my friend the names of the best tech stocks to own for the long term right now, the kind you can pick up and forget about for a decade or more, a “lose behind the radiator” portfolio.
To get this information, I had to promise the utmost confidentiality. If I mentioned his name, you would say “oh my gosh!”
Amazon (AMZN) is now his largest holding, the current leader in cloud computing. Only 5% of the world’s workload is on the cloud presently so we are still in the early innings of a hyper-growth phase there.
By the time you price in all the transportation, labor, and warehousing costs, Amazon breaks even with its online retail business at best. The mistake people make is only focusing on this lowest of margin businesses.
It’s everything else that’s so interesting. While its profitability is quite low compared to the other FANG stocks, Amazon has the best growth outlook. For a start, third-party products hosted on the Amazon site, most of what Amazon sells, offer hefty 30% margins.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) has grown from a money loser to a huge earner in just four years. It’s a productivity improvement machine for the world’s cloud infrastructure where they pass all cost increases on to the customer who, once in, buy more services.
Apple (AAPL) is his second holding. The company is in transition now justifying a massive increase in earnings multiples, from 9X to 25X. The iPhone has become an indispensable device for people around the world, and it is the services sold through the phone that are key.
The iPhone is really not a communications device but a selling device, be it for apps, storage, music, or third-party services. The cream on top is that Apple is at the very beginning of an enormous replacement cycle for its installed base of over one billion phones. Moving from upfront sales to a lifetime subscription model will also give it a boost.
Half of these are more than four years old, and positively geriatric in the tech world. More than half of these are outside the US. 5G has added a turbocharger.
Netflix (NFLX) is another favorite. The world is moving to “over the top” content delivery and Netflix is already spending twice as much on content as any other company in this area. This is why the company won an amazing 44 Emmys last year. This will become a much more profitable company as it grows its subscriber base and amortizes its content costs. Their cash flow is growing by leaps and bounds, which they can use to buy back stock or pay a dividend.
Generally speaking, there is no doubt that the pandemic has pulled forward some future technology demand with the stay-at-home trend. But these companies have delivered normal growth in a hard world.
5G has enabled better Internet coverage for everyone and increased the competitiveness of the telecom companies. Factory automation has been another big area for 5G, as it is reliable and secure, and can be integrated with artificial intelligence.
Transportation will benefit greatly. Connected self-driving cars will be a big deal, improving safety and the quality of life.
My friend is not as worried about government-threatened break-ups as regulation. There will be more restraints on what these companies can do going forward. Europe, which has no big tech companies of its own, views big American tech companies simply as a source of revenue through fines. Driving companies out of business through cutthroat competition is simply not something Europeans believe in.
Google (GOOG) is probably more subject to antitrust proceedings both in Europe and the US. The founders have both retired to pursue philanthropic activities, so you no longer have the old passion (“don’t be evil”).
Both Google and Meta (META) control 70% of the advertising market between them, which is inherently a slow-growing market, expanding at 5% a year at best. (META)’s growth has slowed dramatically, while it has reversed at (GOOG).
He is a big fan of (AMD), one of his biggest positions, which is undervalued relative to the other chip companies. They out-executed Intel (INTC) over the last five years and should pass it over the next five years.
He has raised value tech stocks from 15% to 30% of his portfolio. Apple used to be one of these. Semiconductor companies today also fall into this category. Samsung with 40% margins in its memory business is a good example. Selling for 10X earnings is ridiculously cheap. It is just a matter of time before semiconductors get rerated too.
He was an early owner of Tesla (TSLA) back in the nail-biting days when it was constantly running out of cash. Now they have the opposite problem, using their easy access to cash through new share issues as a weapon to fight off the other EV startups. Tesla is doing to Detroit what Apple did to the cell phone companies, redefining the car.
Its stock is overvalued now but will become much more profitable than people realize. They also are starting to extract services revenues from their cars, like Apple has. Tesla will grow revenues by 30%-50% a year for the next two or three years. They should sell several millions of the new small SUV Model Y. Most other companies bringing EVs will fall on their faces.
EVs are a big factor in climate change, even in China, the world’s biggest polluter. In Europe, they are legislating gasoline cars out of existence. If you can make money building cars in Fremont, CA, you can make a fortune building them in China.
Tech valuations are high, there is no doubt about it. But interest rates are much lower by comparison. The Fed is forcing people to buy stocks, enabling these companies to evolve even faster.
Tech stocks have a lot more things going for them than against them. The customers keep coming back for more.
Needless to say, the above stocks should make up your short list for LEAPS to buy at the coming market bottom.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
August 1, 2022
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(The iCar)
(APPL)
CEO Tim Cook and the company he runs, Apple (AAPL), are widely known as the iPhone company, but he wants to change that.
Cook wants to take over your car because the iPhone business is saturating at an alarming speed.
So what’s his plan for the iCar?
Apparently, he doesn’t want Apple to produce the physical car, but he wants access to the system that controls the car.
By doing this, Cook saves time by avoiding the physical design process of the metal, suspension, engine, and curves during inflationary times.
Cook feels that it’s more cost-effective to play God from a remote office in California.
Why not?
The manufacturing part is a serious risk these days with bottlenecked supply chains and rising input prices.
This leads me to say, there will likely be no Apple-branded car, even though all the Apple fanatics have been waiting for years for this.
Apple wants the car to be made by the car companies.
If Apple and Cook can pull this off, this would most likely become Cook’s legacy at Apple after he steps down in the future.
Like it or not, he’s been living in the shadow of Steve Jobs’ contributions to Apple since he took the CEO job.
He finally is looking to put his tailor-made stamp on the company before he leaves.
Cook has always been overshadowed by Jobs because he’s never been able to bring uniqueness like Jobs did.
At its WWDC developer conference recently, Apple presented a new version of its car operating system Carplay, which is due to be launched at the end of 2023.
So far, Carplay can do relatively little. Users can use the navigation, plus some apps like music and voice control and this is the first step to building a killer system that will later be installed as the car's nervous system.
Apple wants to completely take over the interior of the car in terms of software and the iPhone will simply be used as hardware.
The fact that the new Carplay version will not be available until the end of 2023 indicates that a stronger CPU will also be used in the iPhone. This will be the in-house M1 or M2 chip in the mobile version, which is expected in the iPhone by 2023 at the latest.
Just 4% of users say they prefer the built-in infotainment system to Apple's. In addition, owners of expensive vehicles are more likely to own a new iPhone model. So premium brands would run the risk of losing customers if they didn't offer Apple’s Carplay.
The batteries come from China, the electric motors from a supplier, as do large quantities of the other components.
Shockingly enough, there hasn’t been much pushback from elite German automakers like Mercedes and Audi.
This is a sign that they know they can’t compete in software against an army full of top-grade dorky software developers at Apple.
But then why would Apple need to work with a German automaker to install an expensive design that would spike costs?
Surely, Apple can outsource iCar manufacturing to China like they already do with the iPhone.
In the case that German automakers gleefully integrate Apple’s software into their own car design, it would mean death to corporate Germany.
It would decrease the value of German auto manufacturers by 75% overnight.
Technology is a winner-takes-all sweepstake and this business situation epitomizes that.
This would most likely get Apple to a $4 trillion market cap while crushing its European competition.
Global Market Comments
July 27, 2022
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(HOW TO GAIN AN ADVANTAGE WITH PARALLEL TRADING),
(GM), (F), (TM), (NSANY), (DDAIF), BMW (BMWYY), (VWAPY),
(PALL), (GS), (EZA), (CAT), (CMI), (KMTUY),
(KODK), (SLV), (AAPL)
Mad Hedge Biotech and Healthcare Letter
July 26, 2022
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(ANOTHER TECH AND HEALTHCARE CROSSOVER)
(ONEM), (AMZN), (TDOC), (AMWL), (GOOGL), (AAPL), (MSFT), (CVS), (WBA), (UNH)
The battle for telemedicine dominance might have just ended before it even began.
Amazon (AMZN) just announced its all-cash plan to acquire One Medical (ONEM) for $3.9 billion, paying $18 per share.
To date, this will be Amazon’s biggest step toward the healthcare world.
With the entry of Amazon into this telehealth segment, companies like Teladoc (TDOC) and Amwell (AMWL) would need to work overtime to match the resources of the e-commerce giant.
However, Amazon’s move isn’t exactly novel considering that other FAANG companies like Google (GOOGL), Apple (AAPL), and Microsoft (MSFT) have already acquired healthcare companies.
What this move simply indicates is that Amazon has finally turned serious in its bid for a bigger piece of the healthcare market.
This isn’t even the first time Amazon decided to go beyond its retail business. It has a pretty diverse portfolio including Amazon Web Services, a cloud infrastructure service, and even Whole Foods.
However, the decision to aggressively pursue the $800 billion healthcare industry might just be what Amazon needs to really move the needle.
In 2018, Amazon shelled out roughly $1 billion to buy an online pharmacy called PillPack which led to the launch of virtual Amazon Care clinics.
On that same year, the e-commerce company also pursued a joint venture, dubbed Haven, with Berkshire Hathaway and JPMorgan Chase. Unfortunately, that plan didn’t pan out and was eventually shut down.
Buying One Medical at a premium of 77%, Amazon beat other interested bidders including CVS (CVS), Walgreens (WBA), and UnitedHealth (UNH).
It’s still unclear what Amazon plans with One Medical. The e-commerce giant might add it to its Amazon Care brand or let it operate independently.
One Medical is a membership-based platform, which is backed by the Carlyle Group (CG) and managed under 1Life Healthcare.
Like most telehealth companies, it offers virtual healthcare services like virtual visits. What makes it different is that it also provides in-person checkups in accredited medical offices within the US.
One Medical’s app enables clients to schedule appointments, talk with their healthcare provider, and ask for prescriptions.
A key selling point is that the company guarantees that all the appointments start on time. Another notable feature is that users can gift a yearlong subscription to someone for $199.
Like Teladoc and Amwell, the company isn’t profitable yet. This case isn’t shocking for a relatively new field.
However, One Medical’s strategy has led to impressive revenue and membership growth.
The company’s revenue has consistently increased since its 2020 IPO. In 2021, its membership count climbed by 34% to reach 736,000.
In the first quarter of 2022, One Medical’s membership grew again by 28% and revenue jumped 109% to record over $254 million. So far, more than 8,000 companies provide One Medical services to their staff.
For 2022, One Medical projects its revenue to be between $831 million and $853 million.
Admittedly, these figures seem inconsequential when you compare them to the other sectors of Amazon’s business. For example, Amazon Web Services raked in $18.4 billion in sales in the first quarter of 2022.
Actually, One Medical’s revenue and membership growth might even look small and unimpressive compared to Teladoc, which recorded $565 million in the first quarter and has more than 54 million members in the US alone.
Undoubtedly, the healthcare market offers a mouthwatering opportunity for the likes of Amazon. It’s a lucrative industry, one of the handful that can truly make a difference in an already thriving business. Moreover, it has been highly profitable over the years.
Nonetheless, the acquisition of One Medical isn’t a foolproof plan for Amazon’s dominance in healthcare. So far, the e-commerce giant’s track record has been mixed. That doesn’t mean that the deal is a bad move. In fact, it indicates Amazon’s seriousness in making a play for the healthcare market.
Either way, the clear winner would be One Medical. Since the announcement, the stock has risen 70%.
Moreover, even if Amazon falls victim to politicization or anti-trust issues involving the deal, One Medical still has a number of suitors lined up.
Basically, it’s a win-win for this emerging telehealth company.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
July 8, 2022
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE END OF SAMSUNG)
(SAMSUNG), (QCOM), (MU), (AAPL)
Samsung, Korea’s stalwart chaebol, is toast.
Remember the past two years when lockdowns were in vogue?
Digital products were the hottest item in the world as everybody was stuck in their homes.
Growth brought forward is never a bad thing for a company, especially tech companies.
However, it sets the stage for hard comps to topple and a reversion back to the mean which can look messy.
The world needed chips and phones back then, the world is now traveling, getting on planes, and taking cruise ships to the Caribbean.
This is why video game growth is quite subdued this year.
Samsung internally has also been taking a machete to its forward-looking estimates multiple times in order to front-run collapsing demand.
The boom bust nature of chips and devices is an inherent beast in the industry that is hard to tame.
Samsung was able to hit watered-down targets in the second quarter, but that was mainly due to a 7% currency tailwind of the Korean won sliding fast just like many Asian currencies.
Take a look at the Japanese yen, it’s gone off a cliff all the way to 136 per $1.
I remember when I took a vacation to Tokyo in 2011, Japan felt awfully expensive at 77 yen to $1.
The currency tailwinds are a transitory elixir yet under the hood, these economies are weakening fast.
The aging population and cost of living crisis are also crushing sales.
Internal data reveals deeper damage than initially thought.
Operating profit missed by a wider margin than revenue beat and prices for its premium products isn’t fetching the prices they once did.
For example, Samsung markets its Exynos 2200 chips as on-par rivals to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and Apple’s (AAPL) A15 Bionic chip found in smartphones.
However, the Exynos fails to compete with its supposed flagship chip comps, performing at levels lagging almost a generation behind in speed and functionality.
It’s clear that devices made with Exynos chips simply won’t be able to sell for as much as flagship Android phones with Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 or Apple iPhones with A15 Bionic chips.
I fully expect the operation profit to go from 6% to 3% for Samsung.
US rival Micron (MU) has already rung the alarm. While the world’s third-largest maker of DRAM posted revenue and operating profit for the quarter in line with estimates, its forecast for the coming three months was 20% lower than expectations.
It now sees the PC and smartphone markets much weaker than previously thought.
Tech has experienced a massive downgrade in terms of sentiment and sales while massive pressure on the supply side costs.
Cloud computing and streaming services which all need chips have been the poster boys of underperformance.
Growth stocks have also gotten killed.
I do believe this is more a signal of deeper individual malaise at Samsung and an indication they are getting trounced by Chinese firms who just do it better for cheaper.
Margins won’t ever come back up for Samsung as they lack the nimbleness of the Chinese and brute power of the American tech.
They are essentially stuck between a rock and a hard place where products will become less competitive, face rapidly shrinking margins, and participate in a Korean economy that lacks vibrancy.
Once chip stocks bottom, avoid Samsung, and get into Qualcomm (QCOM) and Micron (MU).
Mad Hedge Biotech and Healthcare Letter
July 5, 2022
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(AN AAA-RATED STOCK POISED TO DELIVER MARKET-BEATING RETURNS)
(JNJ), (AAPL), (GOOGL), (AMZN), (MSFT), (TSLA), (META), (BRK.A)
Legal Disclaimer
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.