Below please find subscribers’ Q&A for the September 22 Mad Hedge Fund TraderGlobal Strategy Webinar broadcast from the safety of Silicon Valley.
Q: When’s the United States US Treasury bond fund (TLT) going to go down?
A: When J. Powell tapers, which will be either today or in 6 weeks. That's the time frame we’re looking at now, and people are positioning now for the taper—that's why financials are taking off like a rocket. Buy those financials and don't expect too much from your tech stocks for the next few months.
Q: What do you think of adding corporate or municipal bonds to my portfolio?
A: Don’t do that on pain of death please; you will lose money. Corporate bonds will get slaughtered the second interest rates turn because they have the most exposure from a credit point of view to any downgrades resulting from rising interest rates. Better to keep your money in cash than buy bonds here. It was a great idea 10 years ago, but a terrible idea today. Just buy cash or buy extremely deep-in-the-money LEAPS which will get you a 10-20% per year return.
Q: What are the chances that the government defaults?
A: Zero, because corporate profits this year will increase from $2 trillion to $10 trillion, spinning off massive tax revenues for the government. The deficit will come down substantially in the future as a result. Keep expecting upwards surprises in profits and taxable revenues. That may be why the (TLT) is staying so high.
Q: I need a customized LEAPS on a stock.
A: We do those for our concierge customers. If you’re interested, then email Filomena at customer support at support@madhedgefundtrader.com.
Q: What brand of shot did you get?
A: Pfizer (PFE).
Q: The Government is showing no sign of balancing a budget and the hole will only get deeper; what are your thoughts?
A: I agree, and that’s why I'm short the (TLT). All we need is a taper to really get some juice under that trade; we really don’t need that much. Ten-year US Treasury yields are now around 1.30% and we only need the yield to get up to about 1.70% for us to make a maximum profit on our positions. One taper hint and it could get us up to those levels.
Q: Why is Visa (V) dropping so much?
A: Fear of being replaced by Bitcoin. This is the big thing dragging all three credit card companies down, including American Express (AXP) and master Card (MA). That's why I have not added a Visa position among my financials in this go around.
Q: How can the Fed unwind their balance sheet and normalize interest rates to a historical average of 4-5%?
A: Quite easily: quit buying bonds. They’re still buying $120 billion/month worth. Technology has accelerated with the pandemic and we all know this is highly deflationary. I expect the next peak in interest rates to be only 3% or 3.5%, not the 6% we saw in the last peak in interest rates in the 2000s. So yeah, bonds are going to go down but not back to 2000’s level.
Q: Thoughts on the Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) shot?
A: No thank you. If you get to choose, Moderna (MRNA) is now producing the best immunity data on a year-to-date basis if you’re starting out from scratch. Some people are mixing, they start out with Pfizer and then get Moderna. They get a worse reaction because the Moderna initial reaction shot sees the Pfizer vaccine as a new virus, so you may get a small flu as a result of that.
Q: What is the put spread you’re recommending on the TLT?
A: The May 2022 $150-$155 vertical put spread. That is the sweet spot now on the short side on (TLT) LEAPS. You should earn a 115% profit in eight months on this trade if interest rates remain unchanged or fall.
Q: Do you expect the ProShares Ultra Short 20 year+ Treasury ETF (TBT) to make it to $20 this year?
A: Yes, I do; $16 to $20 isn’t that much of a move. Remember, the (TBT) is a two times short ETF.
Q: Are you recommending bank stocks?
A: Yes, Morgan Stanley (MS) and JP Morgan (JPM) are two of the best. They will lead the yearend rally starting from here.
Q: When do you expect the semiconductor shortage to end?
A: End of next year, or maybe even 2023, because what all the analysts keep underestimating is that the end of shortages is based on companies getting the chips they want today. The actual issue is that companies are designing billions of chips into their products at an exponential rate, and what they’ll need in a year from now is far higher than most people realize. The semiconductor shortage is much more structural than people realize—that's my theory. They don’t throw up a $2 billion fab overnight. So, this will keep going on for a while and be a drag on economic growth.
Q: Are you sure we won’t see $100 oil (USO)?
A: With oil, you're never sure about anything, although I highly doubt it. We’d have to have monster economic growth in China to get oil up to $100 a barrel. Right now, China is going the other way.
Q: What’s your view on the debt ceiling? Will it give us a good buying opportunity?
A: Probably not, our good buying opportunity was yesterday or Monday. These debt crises are always one minute before midnight solutions. They always get solved. Never underestimate the ability of Congressmen to spend money in their own district. So, I don’t think that would create a stock market crash like it might have done 20 years ago.
Q: What about Freeport McMoRan (FCX)?
A: It’s taking a dip here because of a possible real estate crash in China, and of course China is the world’s largest buyer of copper for apartment construction. I’m kind of taking a break here on Freeport McMoRan and US Steel (X) until we learn a little more about the China situation. They did move to start a bailout today. Let’s see if that continues.
Q: When will the airlines come back?
A: They’ll come back when business travel returns, which I think could be next year. If you eliminate the virus completely, these things double easily. That's the bet you’re making. Let’s see if the covid boosters work, the childhood shots work, and then you can take another look at Delta (DAL) and Alaska (ALK).
Q: If Bitcoin gains mass adoption, does that put banks out of business just like electric vehicles are making oil obsolete?
A: No, not if the banks go into the Bitcoin business. And the banks actually have the cash, resources, and infrastructure to take over the Bitcoin area once the technology matures. And the corollary to that is that the oil industry is that the majors have the infrastructure, the manpower, and the capital to take over the alternative energy business if they choose to do so and oil goes to zero, which it eventually will. The proof of that is the largest investor in all the Silicon Valley energy startups are Saudi Arabian venture capital funds. They’re huge investors in solar here. If Saudi Arabia has a lot of oil, they have even more solar. Believe me, I’ve been there.
Q: Will a lack of inventory and rising interest rates end the bidding wars on houses soon?
A: Only if you consider 10 years soon. That is how long it will take for the sizes of different generations to come into balance, the Millennials (85 million) versus the Gen Xers (45 million). That’s when the housing bubble will end, but that won’t be for another decade. We still have a structural shortage of new home construction (about 5 million units a year) because all the home builders who went bust in the financial crisis in 2008/2009 and never came back—all of that new construction is still missing. And the surviving ones haven’t increased production to meet that shortfall because they want to manage their risk. Eventually, they will and that probably will be the next top, but that’s really 2030 type business.
Q: What about Federal Express (FDX)?
A: Labor shortages. It's hitting (UPS), (FDX), the Post Office, and DHL too—all the couriers.
Q: When do you think gold (GLD) and silver (SLV) rise back to 2,000?
A: I am avoiding gold and silver as long as Bitcoin has buyers. The action in Bitcoin is 10x the movement you get in gold and that’s attracted all the speculative capital in the market, draining all interest from gold, which hit a new six-month low just last week.
Q: What’s your buy target for Apple (AAPL)?
A: I would say if you can get it at $135, that would be a gift. We did get close to $140 at the lows this week; that’s when you start nibbling, and then you double up again at $135. I doubt Apple is going down more than 10% in this cycle. There are too many people still trying to get into it. And they’re still the largest buyer of stock in the world. They only buy one stock, their own.
Q: I never got any IPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short Term Futures ETN (VXX) alerts.
A: That's because we never sent any out. (VIX) has become an incredibly difficult game to play, accumulating positions for months and then trying to get out on a one-day spike that lasts a few minutes. The insiders have too much of a house advantage here, who only play from the short side. There are too many better fish to fry.
Q: What about the Apple electric vehicle?
A: I’ll believe it when I see it; I've been hearing about this for something like seven years. My guess is that Apple is more likely to supply consoles and parts to other EV makers and help them get into the game with software and so on. I think that will be Apple's role in all of this.
Q: How much has China Evergrande Group stock fallen?
A: It’s a really illiquid stock in China so we never got involved in it. I think it’s down more than half. Even the professional short-sellers like Jim Chanos and Kyle Bass, have been targeting that stock for 10 years are now screaming they’re vindicated. Of course, they lost fortunes in the meantime. So, I'll pass on that one.
Q: What about stop losses on LEAPS trades?
A: I don’t really run LEAPS portfolios or issue stop losses. The idea is to run these into expiration, and we’ve never had one expire out of the money, although I may break that record if TLT doesn’t turn around in the next three months.
Q: How would autonomous trucking impact rail transportation?
A: They’re two totally different things. Trucking companies like Yellow Corporation (YELL) carry smaller cargo for local deliveries or small long-distance deliveries. 7Some 70% of all railroad traffic is coal going to China, and the rest is bulk commodities like wood chips, iron ore, etc. Trucks don’t carry any of that, so they’re totally separate businesses. But, if we went totally autonomous on trucking, it would make all the main trucker companies massively profitable, as they get rid of their drivers. Right now, every trucking company in the US has a driver shortage.
Q: United Airlines (UAL) pilots are now ordered to get vaccinated.
A: I think within months to hold a job anywhere in the US, you will have to get vaccinated. They do not want you in the office without a vaccination. Jobs are not worth risking lives, and we hit 2,000 deaths again yesterday. The corporations are taking the lead, not the government. The exception will be the politically motivated companies, like the My Pillow Guy; I doubt they'll ever require vaccinations at My Pillow. And there are a few other companies such as Hobby Lobby that are also anti-vaxers. But all public transport companies, hospitals, etc., are going to say get vaccinated or get out—it’s very simple.
Q: Should I buy Berkshire (BRKB) here?
A: Yes, it’s a great entry point, even if you can't get my price. Go higher in the strikes or go farther out in maturity.
Q: Is copper metal (CPER) a buy here?
A: Probably long term, but short term will be subject to the whims of the Chinese real estate crisis if there is one.
Q: Won’t Natural Gas (UNG) outperform in the power grid since all EVs must be charged?
A: Not if the grid is 100% electric. Natural gas still has carbon in it, although only half as much as oil or gasoline. I think even natural gas eventually gets phased out because you can expect solar panels to improve by 80% over the next ten years. At that point, any other energy source won’t be able to compete—oil, natural gas, you name it. And that is why you don’t see any long-term money going into carbon energy sources.
Q: Iron ore has just gone from $200 to $100, why are you bullish?
A: Yes, Because it has just gone from $200 to $100. Eventually, China recovers, despite a short-term financial and housing crisis. Buy low, sell high—that’s my revolutionary new strategy.
Q: What are your thoughts on Bitcoin vs Ethereum?
A: I think Ethereum will outperform Bitcoin because it has a more modern technology. It’s only six years old, vs 12 years for Bitcoin. It’s also more efficient, using less energy in its production. In fact, we did get a double in Ethereum in August as opposed to only a 50% move in Bitcoin.
Q: Do you have any concerns on holding the financials through earnings in October?
A: No, I think the results will be fantastic, and I want to be long going into those.
Q: What does the current situation with China mean for Alibaba (BABA)?
A: Keep your stocks, you’ve already taken the hit—down 53%. The next surprise is that China quits beating up on capitalism and these things will all recover bigtime. However, any options you may have could expire before that happens. So, keep the stocks, get rid of the options, salvage whatever time value you can, and then wait for China to start doing the right thing.
Q: What are the best solar stocks?
A: First Solar (FSLR) and SunPower (SPWR), which have both done great.
Q: If bonds are a no-no, and governments are getting more indebted than ever, who will buy them?
A: Governments. The only buyers of bonds now are non-economic buyers. Those would be governments, central banks, and banks who are required by law to own certain amounts of bonds to meet regulatory capital requirements. No individual in their right mind is buying any bonds here at all, nor is any financial advisor recommending them.
To watch a replay of this webinar with all the charts, bells, whistles, and classic rock music, just log in to www.madhedgefundtrader.com, go to MY ACCOUNT, click on GLOBAL TRADING DISPATCH, then WEBINARS, and all the webinars from the last ten years are there in all their glory.
Good Luck and Stay Healthy.
John Thomas
CEO & Publisher
The Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/tootsie.png331522Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2021-09-24 09:02:442021-09-24 11:19:08September 22 Biweekly Strategy Webinar Q&A
One might postulate that the price of bitcoin and Chinese housing has no relevant correlation with each other.
Think again!
Granted, Chinese citizens aren’t denominating their mortgages in bitcoin to snap their ritzy Shanghai townhouses overlooking the Bund.
I don’t mean that.
But Bitcoin is an asset just like stocks, bonds, and commodities and is exposed to one-off events that shake out the financial system.
What’s brewing in the Middle Kingdom?
Chinese biggest property builder Evergrande teeters on the brink of financial devastation.
Add it up, Chinese bank deposits are $35 Trillion, more than 2x the US.
Would any Chinese financial crisis lead to an epic flight to fiat alternatives?
Does nobody recognize that this is a planned liquidity drain of the property market in China by the CCP?
All escape "exits" have already been shut. You can't even buy paper gold in China either - forget Bitcoin!
So I don’t believe that the potential disorderly selling of Chinese flats or the bust of a major property developer would end up boosting the price of Bitcoin because the Chinese government has made it abundantly clear that bitcoin is a red line for its citizens.
If there is a 20% dip in Chinese property prices — Chinese would believe that’s a once-in-a-century buy the dip type of event.
That doesn’t mean that some won’t try to sell on the down low and get their money out of China through hell or high water.
Some certainly will — China made it clear they didn’t want their citizens investing in overseas assets — I know of the odd millionaire spinning out a random credit card to put a down payment on a house in Vancouver.
What this does scream is policy error big time — an overtightening that could result in a hard landing that is ruinous for global growth.
That would be the worst-case scenario and I would put that at 10%.
Why is this company systemically important?
Evergrande was once China’s darling real estate developer. Now, it is gagging on debt.
It was founded in 1997 by Xu Jiayin. It has completed around 1,300 commercials, residential and infrastructure projects and supposedly employs upwards of 200,000 people.
The company’s success came because it was aligned perfectly for the parabolic boom in real estate that has been driven by the last two decades of staggering Chinese growth, growth for a country that is unparalleled in all of modern human history.
The tragedy in all this is that 1.5 million Chinese have put deposits down on homes that haven’t been built and this is more often than not their entire life savings.
Most likely, it is them who will hold the bag and lose their deposit.
Better them than me.
For a soft landing to happen, the Chinese government must pull out all the bells and whistles.
Even though I categorize this as a quasi-gray swan, opposed to a solid black swan, it is highly likely that it won’t spill over into the broader market, and if we do get a large bitcoin dip, bitcoin buyers finally are gifted a cheaper price to enter bitcoin.
These opportunities are few and far between recently, at least in 2021, and I can guarantee that MicroStrategy CEO Michael Saylor is already ginning up his next bitcoin purchase usually done with his own company's corporate paper.
Limiting the fallout will be easily done if the Chinese government flood the right channels with liquidity, plugging the holes before they become unpluggable kinda like our own debt ceiling mess.
The larger issue is to ponder — is this the tip of the iceberg?
The silence and a lack of major actions from policymakers is making everyone nervous, but most likely they are sorting it out behind the scenes.
The response so far has been largely limited to the People’s Bank of China, which injected a net 90 billion yuan into the banking system. It added another 100 billion yuan on Saturday.
Evergrande has been mired in $300 billion worth of liabilities, more than any other property developer in the world. It’s a beast in China’s high-yield dollar bond market, accounting for about 16% of outstanding notes.
A lackluster response to an already expensive market could be costly, with real estate accounting for 40% of household assets in China. Data last week showed home sales by value slumped 20% in August from a year earlier, the biggest drop since the onset of the coronavirus early last year.
Isolating Evergrande is almost a point of emphasis for the Chinese Communist Party and the mission is to harangue them as a scapegoat for sky-high property prices.
They are the fall guy.
This is more of a political show than anything else — a show of power — letting the world know that this economic pain is nothing to even bat an eyelid about.
Bitcoin, perceived as a riskier asset along the risk curve, is not immune from a sell-off and a flight to safety has taken prices down around 10%.
I have full faith in the Chinese government and its authority to nip this in the bud, and around the $40,000 level, the price of Bitcoin should offer resistance.
If Bitcoin holds $40,000 and a resolution to this is announced, expect a 10% surge in Bitcoin prices.
This should not be treated as anything more than a standard 5% equity drop that is equivalent to a 10% crypto drop in prices.
Book some of those gaudy profits you made in the first half of the year to drop your cost basis while deploying capital at lower levels.
THE AFTERMATH OF GOLD MINING IS DEVASTATING
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/gold-mining-aftermath.png482920Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2021-09-23 13:02:382021-09-23 13:37:32Different Ways to Play Crypto
One of the most underappreciated names in the biotechnology sector might just be the biggest winner in a winner-take-most market today: Invitae (NVTA).
Despite being at the receiving end of a seemingly endless flogging since the year started, Invitae remains an attractive stock for the likes of Cathie Woods.
In fact, this San Francisco-based company is one of the Top 20 holdings of ARK Innovation (ARKK) and ARK Genomic Revolution (ARKG).
Described by Woods as "probably one of the most important companies in the genomic revolution," Invitae is the sixth-largest holding of the ARK Investment portfolio with more than $1 billion worth of exposure.
Aside from ARK, Invitae also recently attracted the attention of Japanese tech conglomerate SoftBank (SFTBY), which came in the form of $1.2 billion worth of convertible bond investment.
First, it’s essential to understand that biotech companies opt to target particular niches where they aim to maintain high prices and maximize profitability for as long as possible.
That way, they can maintain and continue to boost their profits.
This results in highly prohibitive costs in the healthcare innovation section, which in turn cause rationing of cases because only a select group of patients can actually afford the exorbitant fees for the innovative drug or therapy.
While rationing care and maximizing profits are obviously great for investors, this makes the innovations inaccessible to people who could not shell out the cash to take the tests or treatments.
This is where Invitae comes in.
Basically, Invitae is taking a completely different approach compared to its peers in the biotechnology world.
According to the company, its mission is "to bring comprehensive genetic information into mainstream medicine to improve healthcare for billions of people."
How will Invitae achieve this?
Instead of choosing a single genetic variant to test, which costs over $1,000 each, the company is developing a testing platform that can identify thousands of genetic variants.
The clincher? This will only cost less than $250 for the entire test panel.
This nonconforming approach to biotechnological innovations is what has primarily led to Invitae’s under-appreciation.
However, Invitae’s mission holds incredible potential.
What it means in medical terms is that the company can help about 1 in 6 people suffering from a medical condition with an inherent genetic factor.
What it means in financial terms is that the company holds the possibility of generating several hundred dollars per year from over 2 billion people—a jaw-dropping market opportunity worth $4 trillion.
One of Invitae’s key ideas is to grant people access to their genetic information and then interpret it for them.
To me, this indicates the company’s goal of doing for genetics what Amazon (AMZN) has done for book buyers.
The next question is this: Can Invitae truly accomplish this?
Let’s consider the company’s growth trajectory along with the catalysts ahead.
So far, three catalysts can push the company towards its goals.
First is the steady growth in testing volume. As with most medical procedures, the volume of genetic testing went down during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, this is now rebounding gradually.
In the first quarter of 2021, the billable volume went up by 72% year over year, with roughly 259,000 tests in that quarter alone.
Traditionally, genetic testing is generally driven by orders from doctors and the cooperation of health plans to cover the tests.
Moving forward, we expect pharmaceutical firms to play more significant roles in promoting and even paying for these tests.
Approximately 90% of the pharma pipelines these days are based on genetic conditions.
As these new and innovative genetic treatments gain FDA approval, the pharma companies would have additional vested interest in ensuring eligible patients receive testing. That way, they can drive demand for the therapies they developed.
The second catalyst comprises the oncology sector.
Genetic testing has become the trend, particularly for cancer—an undoubtedly massive and financially lucrative market.
To leverage this growth, Invitae acquired ArcherDX in 2020 in an effort to expand its offerings.
With this purchase, the company can help major cancer centers implement their testing systems while also offering support to healthcare providers who opt not to do their own testing.
The availability of these comprehensive services will serve as critical drivers of income and profitability considering the historically proven high reimbursement rates in the oncology testing segment.
Apart from this, Invitae recently announced its decision to acquire Ciitizen, a consumer health tech firm, for $325 million.
This move will allow Invitae to expand its patient database through the genomic and clinical information gathered from Ciitizen’s platform.
Thus far, Invitae has announced 13 acquisitions over the past 5 years.
The third catalyst is the continuous global growth of Invitae.
Evidently, the mission of reaching 2 billion people requires worldwide expansion—something that the company has been working on.
In fact, roughly 18% of the total billable volume of Invitae in the first quarter came from international transactions, which have the potential to grow faster than their business in the US.
To date, Invitae has been expanding its operations in Japan, Israel, Europe, and Australia.
Meanwhile, Invitae’s incredible potential has attracted other companies as well. Exact Sciences (EXAS) has been linked to the company for a potential merger among the firms interested.
Admittedly, Invitae’s mission to offer affordable and accessible genetic testing to 2 billion people will require many more years before it comes to fruition.
When that day comes, the company will join Apple (APPL), Amazon, and Microsoft (MSFT) as part of an elite group with $1 trillion and over market cap.
The long wait for Invitae to achieve this ambitious goal would be worth it for patient buy-and-hold investors.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2021-09-14 16:00:572021-09-16 02:27:21Is This the Biggest Winner in a Winner-Take-Most Market?
Below please find subscribers’ Q&A for the August 25 Mad Hedge Fund TraderGlobal Strategy Webinar broadcast from The Atlantis Casino Hotel in Reno, NV.
Q: How does a 2X ProShares Ultra Technology ETF (ROM) February 2022 vertical bull call spread on the ROM look? Would you do $110-$115 or $115-$120?
A: I would do nothing here at $112.50 because we’ve just gone up 10 points in a week. I’d wait for some kind of pullback, even just $5 or $10 points, and then I would do the $110-$115. I’m leaning towards more conservative LEAPS these days—bets that the market goes sideways to up small rather than going ballistic, which it has done for the last 18 months. Think at-the-money strikes, not deep out-of-the-money on your LEAPS from here on for the rest of this economic cycle. The potential profits are still enormous. The only problem with (ROM) is that the longest maturities on the options are only six months.
Q: How do you recommend entering your long-term portfolio?
A: I would use the one-third rule: you put on ⅓ now, ⅓ higher or lower later on, and ⅓ higher or lower again. That way you get a good average price. Long term, everything goes up until we hit the next recession, which is probably several years off.
Q: I keep reading that the Delta variant is a market risk, but I don’t think that investors will look through this. Is Delta already priced into the shares?
A: Yes, what is not priced into the shares is the end of Delta, the end of the pandemic—and that will lead to my “everything” rally that I’ve been talking about for a month now. And we have already seen the beginning of that, especially with the price action this week. So yes, Delta in: dead market; Delta out: roaring market.
Q: Do you think there will eventually be a rotation into emerging markets (EEM), or has the virus battered these markets too much to even consider it?
A: Sometime in our future—not yet—the emerging markets will be our core holding. And the trigger for that will be the collapse of the dollar, which is hitting an interim high right now. When the greenback rolls over and dies, you can expect emerging markets, especially China, to take off like a rocket. That’s going to be our next big trade. I don't know if it will be this year or next year but it’s coming, so start doing your emerging market research now, and keep reading my newsletter.
Q: Is the coming tax hike a problem for the stock market?
A: No, I don’t think so. First off, I don’t think they’re going to do a tax bill this year; they don’t want anything to interfere with the 2022 election, so it may be next year’s business. Also, any new taxes are going to be overwhelmingly focused on billionaires, carried interest, offshoring, and large corporations. The middle class, people who make less than $400,000 a year, will not see any tax hike at all, possibly even getting some tax cuts via restored SALT deductions. So, I don't really see it affecting the stock market at all.
Q: What do you think about Chinese stocks (FXI)?
A: Long-term they’re okay, short term possibly more downside. Interestingly, the bigger risk may not be China itself and how the government is beating up its own tech companies, but the SEC. It has indicated they don’t really like these offshore vehicles that have been listed on the New York Stock Exchange, and they may move to ban them. I’m not rushing into China right now, only because there are just so many better opportunities in the US stock market for the time being. I may go back in the future—it’s a case where I’d rather buy them on the way up than trying to catch a falling knife on China right now.
Q: Do you expect any market impact from the Jackson Hole meeting?
A: Yes, whatever J Powell says, even if he says nothing, will have a market impact. And it will have a bigger impact on the bond market than it will on the stock market, which is down a full point this morning. So yes, but not yet. I imagine we’ll hear something very soon.
Q: September and October tend to be volatile; do you see us having a 5% or 10% pullback in those months?
A: I don’t see any more than 5%, with the hyper liquidity that we have in the system now. There just aren’t any events out there that could trigger a pullback of 10%—no geopolitical events, and the economy will be getting stronger, not worse. So yes, an “everything rally” doesn’t give you many long side entry points, so I just don’t see 10% happening.
Q: What about a Walt Disney (DIS) January 2022 $180-$220 LEAPS?
A: I would do the $180-$200. I think you can afford to be tighter on your spread there, take some more risk because I think it’s just going to go nuts to the upside once we get a drop in COVID cases. By the way, Disney parks are only operating at 70% capacity, so if you go back up to 100% that's a near 50% increase in profits for the company. And it’s not just Disney, but Netflix (NFLX), Amazon (AMZN), and everybody else that’s about to have the greatest number of blockbuster movies released of all time. They’re holding back their big-ticket movies for the end of the pandemic when people can go back into theaters. We’ll start seeing those movies come out in the last quarter of this year, and I’m particularly looking forward to the next James Bond movie, a man after my own heart.
Q: Are EV car charging companies like ChargePoint Holdings (CHPT) going to do as well as the car companies?
A: No. They’re low margin business, so it’s not a business model for me. I like high-profit margins, huge barriers to entry, and very wide moats, which pretty much characterizes everything I own. The big profits in EVs are going to be in the cars themselves. Charging the cars is a very capital-intensive, highly regulated, and low-margin business.
Q: Would a Fed taper cause a 10% pullback?
A: Absolutely not; in fact, I think a taper would make the market go up because Jay Powell has been talking it into the market all year. And that’s his goal, is to minimize the impact of a taper so when they finally do it, they say ho-hum and “okay you can take that risk out of the market.” That’s the way these things work.
Q: What is your yearend target for United States Treasury Bond Fund (TLT)?
A: $132. Call it bold, but I'm all about bold. I think the first stop will be at $144, then $138, then bombs away!
Q: What will it take for (TLT) to dip below $130?
A: Another year of hot economic growth, which Congress seems hell-bent on delivering us.
Q: What are your ProShares Ultra Short 20+ Year Treasury ETF (TBT) targets?
A: When we were at 1.76% on the 10-year bond, the (TBT) made it all the way back to 22 ½. Next year we go higher, probably to $25, maybe even $30.
Q: What’s your 10-year view on the (TBT)?
A: $200. That’s when you get interest rates back to 10% in 10 years on the 10-year bond. So yes, that’s a great long-term play.
Q: How long can we hold (TBT)?
A: As long as you want. Ten years would be a good time frame if you want to catch that $17 to $200 move. The (TBT) is an ETF, not an option, therefore it doesn’t expire.
Q: Are you working on an electrification stock list?
A: I am not, because it’s such a fragmented sector. It’s tough to really nail down specific stocks. I think it’s safe to say that the electric power grid is going to change beyond all recognition, but they won’t necessarily be in high margin companies, and I tend to prefer high-profit-margin, large-moat companies which nobody else can get into, like Apple (AAPL) or Google (GOOG).
Q: What about gas pipelines with high yields?
A: They have a high yield for a reason; because they’re very high risk. If you're going to a carbon-free economy, you don’t necessarily want to own pipelines whose main job is moving carbon; it’s another buggy whip-type industry I would avoid. I’ve seen people get wiped out by these things more times than I could count. If you remember Master Limited Partnerships, quite a few of them went bankrupt last year with the oil crash, so I would avoid that area. These tend to be very highly leveraged and poorly managed instruments.
Q: Best play on silver (SLV)?
A: Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) is the highest leveraged silver play out there, and a great LEAPS candidate. Go out 2 years and triple your money.
Q: Geopolitical oil (USO) risks?
A: No, nobody cares about oil anymore—that’s why we’re giving up on Afghanistan. China is buying 80% of the Persian Gulf oil right now. We don’t really need it at all, so why have our military over there to protect China’s oil supply?
Q: What about Freeport McMoRan (FCX)?
A: I absolutely love it. Any big economic recovery can’t happen without copper, and you have a huge tailwind there from electric cars which need 200 pounds of copper each, as opposed to 20 pounds in conventional cars.
Q: I see AMC Entertainment Holdings (AMC) is up 20% today; should everyone be chasing this stock?
A: No, absolutely not. (AMC) and all the meme stocks aren’t investments, they’re gambling, and there are better ways to gamble.
Q: Should I buy the lumber dip?
A: Yes. I think the slowdown on housing is temporary because it will take 10 years for supply and demand in the housing market to come back into balance because of all the millennials entering the housing market for the first time. So, that would be a yes on lumber and all the other commodities out there that go into housing like copper, steel, and aluminum.
Q: Should I put money into Canadian Junior Gold Miners (GDX)?
A: No, I would rather go out and take a long nap first. These are just so high risk, and they often go bankrupt. The liquidity is terrible, and the dealing spreads are wide. I would stick with the bigger precious metal plays like Newmont Mining (NEM), Barrick Gold (GOLD), and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM).
Q: Is Boeing (BA) a buy here?
A: Yes, we’re back at the bottom end of the trading range for the stock. It’s just a matter of time before they get things right, and the 737 Max orders are rolling in like crazy now that there’s an airplane shortage.
Q: What do you think about Robinhood (HOOD)?
A: I like it quite a lot; I got flushed out of my long position on Friday with a 10% down move. Of course, 90% of my stop losses end up expiring at their maximum profit points, but I have to do it to keep the volatility of the portfolio down. So yes, I’ll try to buy it again on the next dip. The trouble is it’s kind of a quasi-meme stock in its own right, hence the volatility; so I would say on the next 10% down day, you go into Robinhood, and I probably will too.
Q: How are the wildfires around Tahoe?
A: They’re terrible and there are three of them. I did a hike two days ago there, and out of a parking lot with 100 spaces, I was the only one there. It’s the only time I’d ever seen Tahoe deserted in August. With visibility of 500 yards, it's just terrible. Fortunately, I was able to hike without coughing my guts out—it’s not so thick that you can’t breathe.
Q: What do you think of US Steel (X)?
A: I like it, I think the whole industrial commodity complex rallies like crazy going into the end of the year.
Q: As a new member, where is the best place to start? It’s just kind of like drinking from a fire hose.
A: Wait for the trade alerts; they only happen at sweet spots and you may have to wait a few days or weeks to get one since we only like to enter them at good points. That’s the best place to enter new positions for the first time. In the meantime, keep reading all the research, because when these trade alerts do come out, they’re not surprises because I’m pumping out research on them every day, across multiple fronts. Be patient— we are running a 93% success rate, but only because we take our time on entering good trades. The services that guarantee a trade alert every day lose money hand over fist.
Q: If they do delist Chinese stocks, will US investors be left holding the bag?
A: Yes, and that will be the only reason they don’t delist them, that they don’t want to wipe out all current US investors.
To watch a replay of this webinar with all the charts, bells, whistles, and classic rock music, just log in to www.madhedgefundtrader.com, go to MY ACCOUNT, click on GLOBAL TRADING DISPATCH or TECHNOLOGY LETTER (whichever applies to you), then select WEBINARS and all the webinars from the last ten years are there in all their glory.
Good Luck and Stay Healthy.
John Thomas
CEO & Publisher
The Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/john-thomas-wine-1.png812562Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2021-08-27 10:02:412021-08-27 11:03:48August 25 Biweekly Strategy Webinar Q&A
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2021-08-19 10:04:102021-08-19 12:09:49August 19, 2021
Legal Disclaimer
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.