Mad Hedge Technology Letter
February 7, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE DEATH OF THE COLLEGE DEGREE),
(GOOGL), (IBM), (AAPL), (BABA), (BIDU)
Tag Archive for: (AAPL)
If you’re an educator not at a top 25 American university, you might want to stop reading right now.
Disruption.
You’re either on the right or wrong side of it.
I’ve detailed numerous subsets of the economy and society that have been transformed by sharp shifts in technological innovation.
But the one industry that has stealthily moved into the heart and center of technological disruption is education.
For centuries, universities and higher learning institutions had a stranglehold on critical information required to successfully perform in the cutting-edge knowledge economy of those times.
Then on September 15, 1997, a mere 21 years ago, Google search launched its free services to the world and grabbed the monopoly of information away from the college system.
This website effectively caused the cost of information to crater to zero and its free website is ranked #1 as of February 2019 with over 4.5 billion monthly active users.
The ensuing 21 years has been a renaissance in the ability to distribute information propelled by this one platform, and the result is that billions have the ability to study and read up on what they want and when they want.
The ability to learn for free combined with a tight labor market is a promising landscape for job seekers, with analysts forecasting more opportunities for professionals without a degree.
Job-search site Glassdoor amassed a list of various employers no longer bound by requiring applicants to possess a 4-year bachelor’s degree.
These firms aren’t your second-rate companies either made up of gold standard workplaces such as Google, Apple, and IBM.
In 2017, IBM's vice president of talent Joanna Daley confided that about 15% of IBM’s new hires don't have a four-year bachelor qualification.
She emphasizes hands-on experience through coding boot camp or industry-related vocational classes as explicit criteria to get hired.
This development bodes poorly for the future of universities and boosts the prospects of alternative education.
Online college offers working adults ample flexibility in furthering their education.
According to the most recent federal statistics from 2016, roughly one out of every three, or 6.3 million college students learned online.
Even though online courses are becoming more widespread, the best and brightest aren’t attending these schools.
However, it did hijack the marginal student that was on the fence for a 4-year university and brought them into the orbit of for-profit online courses and the revenues that came with it.
That was the first stage of online forces imposing financial pressure on the education marketplace.
Now analysts are discovering the second major trend with higher rated students opting out of the university system altogether.
In many cases, a 4-year university degree is a bad value proposition.
Why is that?
Costs.
In a capitalistic economy that lives and dies by the mantra of buy low and sell high – universities seem to be getting sold short lately.
The exorbitant costs to obtain a 4-year degree has led to an outsized student debt bubble and removed the mystique of this once treasured qualification.
A growing chorus of bipartisan voices has pigeonholed student debt as a major problem across the country.
In the previous presidential election, Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders called this situation “outrageous” as national student debt has spiraled out of control to the amount of $1.5 trillion.
This has been a terrible commercial for the younger generations to follow in the footsteps of the indebted Millennial generation.
And with Generation Z tech savvy at building stand-alone firms buttressed by Instagram and YouTube platforms, why go to college anymore?
Or to nail one of those jobs developing iPhones in Cupertino, why not take a few coder boot camps and self-develop a portfolio impressive enough to score an Apple interview?
The bottom line is that there are workarounds for a fraction of the price.
And because tech firms have outpaced analog companies in salaries and hiring for the past two decades, there is an outsized bias on compiling technical skills that will lead a candidate down a path to a salary of over $100,000 quicker than a 4-year degree can.
Not many other industries can claim the same.
The cracks are beginning to reveal themselves in the overall university apparatus.
Universities had years of record revenue that they reinvested into the system to enhance programs, staff, buildings, stadiums, and infrastructure.
The financial catalyst was the rise of the Chinese college student.
The latest statistics nailed the number of Chinese nationals in America studying for 4-year degrees at over half a million.
Many of those were trained up with engineering-related degrees and bolted back home to find jobs at Baidu (BIDU), Tencent, or Alibaba (BABA) powering Chinese Inc.
However, the drop off in demographics from young Chinese and Americans are forcing universities to fight for a shallower pool of candidates with less attractive degrees relative to the value of degrees of past generations.
The second-tier universities are hardest hit with examples galore.
Alcorn State University in Mississippi saw a dramatic 69.45% decrease in applications in 2018 and its rural location didn’t help either.
Alabama State University is feeling the pinch with a 33.06% drop in application in recent years.
If you thought the University of New Orleans was clawing its way back to relevancy after Hurricane Katrina, you are mistaken with its 38.23% drop in applications.
Military schools haven’t been spared either with applications to The United States Air Force Academy crashing 28.12% over the past ten years.
A confluence of deadly trends is about to beset the university system and schools will likely go bust.
Technology is giving a reason for students to bypass the system while also speeding up the financial timebombs many universities are about to confront.
Then we must ask ourselves, will universities even exist in the future?
Probably, but perhaps just the top 25 elite schools that are still worth the high costs.
IS IT STILL WORTH IT?
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
February 6, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(ALPHABET WOWS THEM AGAIN),
(GOOGL), (AMZN), (AAPL), (MSFT)
Alphabet (GOOGL) is entangled in the same imbroglio as Apple (AAPL), that is why I have held back on issuing any trade alerts on this name.
The stalwart is still grinding out a respectable 20% of revenue growth in their core business but the underlying conundrum is that their hyper-growth segments are 5 times or more diminutive than their bread and butter of digital ads.
Apple is addressing the same type of strain in attempting to flip high octane revenue drivers into a bigger piece of the pie – the services business trails the hardware business by a large margin.
This phenomenon highlights how investors demand tech companies to grow at elevated rates and a maturing business model isn’t given any free passes.
Investors simply migrate towards higher growth names period.
That being said, Alphabet’s digital ad business is one of the premier tech divisions in all of technology and the American economy.
How powerful is it?
They did $32.6 billion in sales last quarter.
If you look at that number without context, it is quite impressive, but there are several lurking impediments.
This 20% QOQ growth is flatter than a pancake offering evidence that the best days are behind them.
No investors like to hear the dreaded “P word” thrown into a company’s business trajectory – peak.
In respect to revenue growth rates, I expect Google’s digital ad business to gradually decline relative to competition.
This segment also battles with the law of large numbers.
It’s simply difficult to accelerate revenue rates at a 25% YOY clip when revenues are already over $30 billion per quarter. Again, this is another Apple problem and a side effect of being overly successful in one part of the business model.
If investors' tepid reaction about these aspects of the core business telegraph dissatisfaction, then discovering further ancillary problems might be the final dagger in the heart.
Google search’s price per click cratered 29% YOY indicating that variables in the current marketing environment have significantly blunted Google’s pricing power.
Traffic Acquisition Cost (TAC) represents the cost for a company to acquire internet traffic onto their assets.
Alphabet faced a 15% YOY rise in TAC costs last quarter to $7.44 billion illustrating the difficulty in keeping these high costs down.
The bulk of the $7.44 billion stems from a widely known agreement with Apple contracting Google search as its default search engine on Apple devices.
This TAC expense has been surging the past few years and Alphabet has little negotiating power.
Expect an annual 15-20% rise in TAC expenses as long as Alphabet’s digital ads are expanding the standard vanilla 20% most investors expect them to grow.
As a whole, TAC costs soaked up 23% of the digital ad revenue which was in line with analysts’ expectations.
However, I expect this number to surpass 25% before winter because I believe Google search’s ad business will confront ceaseless growth problems.
Amazon’s (AMZN) new-found digital ad business is an influential factor in this story.
New marketing dollars aren’t being showered on Google as they once were, over 50% of product searches populate from Amazon.com today boding poorly for the future of Google search.
This optionality could be a large reason in driving the cost per click downwards.
CEO of Amazon Jeff Bezos refused to enter the digital ad game for years but his recent change of heart will correlate to subduing Google digital ad model.
Consumers are finding less incentive to search on Google for products when they just can smartly and efficiently search on Amazon directly.
Clearly, this only affects product searches and not searches on other informative content such as widely popular searches including “top 10 places to travel in Europe” or “best Thanksgiving recipes.”
Google’s “other revenues” is chugging along nicely with 31% YOY growth headed by Google’s cloud business and hardware division.
This is what Alphabet needs to focus on going forward similar to Microsoft and Amazon web services.
Yes, Google is the 3rd biggest cloud player but miles behind the top two.
Being in catch-up mode is no fun and is part of the reason capital expenditures exploded and came in $1.38 billion higher than expected.
Alphabet simply isn’t doing a good job at executing relative to Amazon and Microsoft frittering away more capital in the name of growth but not curating the type of growth that current expenses justify.
Higher costs damaged operating margins coming down 2% YOY to 21%.
Even more worrisome is that there has been no material progress on the Waymo business.
This is the year that Alphabet expected the technology to roll out to the masses.
However, this broad-based integration will not happen as fast as they would like.
I blame regulation and consumers' hesitation to quickly adopt this new technology.
Alphabet is reliant on this business to carry them to the next level of growth and I believe it can become a $100 billion per year business in a $2 trillion addressable market.
But when you peruse through the “Other Bets” category which houses Alphabet’s other companies such as health venture Verily, the $154 million in revenue was a huge miss against the $187.4 million expected.
Estimates aside, the pitiful fact that Waymo only brings in revenue of less than 1% of total revenue is disappointing.
Summing things up, Alphabet is a great company and is a long-term buy and hold stock even with short term transitory headaches.
In the near term, there is uneasiness about the decreasing profitability, exploding expense factors, a heavy reliance on weakening core business revenue, and a lack of top-line contribution of “other revenues” relative to their core business.
Long term, Alphabet’s game-changing investments have yet to show signs of life in terms of real revenue expansion even though Alphabet is the global leader of artificial intelligence and self-driving technology.
Investors would like to see actionable steps to incorporate this best of breed technology that funnels down to the top and bottom line.
Investors are stuck with a stale digital ads business that has locked the stock into a holding pattern essentially trading sideways for the past year until they prove they are ready to take the next step up.
Looking at Alphabet’s chart, the stock has iron-clad support at $1,000 which it tested in April 2018 and December 2018.
Using this entry point as the lower range would be sensible as I don’t foresee any demonstrably negative news blindsiding the stock, and I surmise that investors will start receiving positive news on Waymo’s roll out towards the middle of the year.
Global Market Comments
February 5, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(A NOTE ON OPTIONS CALLED AWAY)
(TLT), (AAPL),
(THE GOVERNMENT’S COMING WAR ON MONEY)
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
February 5, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE FINTECH COMPANY YOU’VE NEVER HEARD OF),
(FISV), (AAPL), (GOOGL), (FDC), (PYPL), (SQ)
Here’s a company for you involved in technology’s tectonic shift towards FinTech in 2019.
They aren’t new, but you’ve probably never heard of them.
It’s Fiserv Inc. (FISV) which sells financial technology and can include customers such as banks, credit unions, securities broker-dealers, leasing, and finance companies.
An inflection point is occurring within the global business and that is financial technology and the rapid integration of it.
Financial institutions are building products around this concept and Fiserv has a head start on the others with more than 30 years of experience in aiding banks, thrifts, and credit unions, managing cash and processing payments, loans, and account services.
The Wisconsin-based company constructed an unstoppable machine leveraging its time-honored relationships and expertise to bring banking to all the screens that pervade daily life.
“Innovation, Integration and Scale” has been the motto that has served this company well for so long.
The company cut its teeth in the trenches helping banks move money long before it became the next big thing.
Five years ago, under the leadership of CEO Jeff Yabuki, there was a corporate flashpoint with upper management realizing they needed to evolve or die.
Yabuki anticipated a near future fueled by mobile wallets and changing consumer expectations - an always-on, never-off connected world.
An environment where consumers want what they want when they want it.
There has been no letup in this trend.
Silicon Valley companies were always the 800-pound gorilla in the room and Fiserv didn’t want to become sideswiped by them.
And in 2014, at the Money 20/20 conference in Las Vegas, Yabuki set out his vision that continues to prevail today.
The financial services industry had become obsessed with point-of-sale transactions.
And at $200 billion in annual domestic sales, it was a business that resonated to all corners of the FinTech world.
It was sensical to persuade consumers to use branded credit or debit cards to pay for stuff in stores and online.
At the time, that was bread-and-butter banking.
To the banks' chagrin, Silicon Valley has gotten in on the act with the likes of Apple (AAPL), Alphabet (GOOGL), PayPal (PYPL), Square (SQ) firing warning shots.
They formulated products of their own, whipped up the necessary scale and maximized the reverberating network effects.
Yabuki urged financiers at the conference to double down on what they did best while looking to grab low-hanging fruits in the short-term.
The business beyond point-of-sale was theirs waiting on a decorative platter – the opportunity was a $55 billion behemoth consisting of consumer-to-consumer, business-to-business and consumer-to-business transactions.
Embracing FinTech translated into massive speed advantages, stauncher security-laced products while offering traditional bank customers higher quality service at their convenience.
Fiserv erected a platform to help financial institutions focus on payments beyond POS called Network for Our World.
The goal of this NOW Network was to help customers' flow of money by paying bills and getting paid.
These entrepreneurs are looking for more efficient ways to collect money owed - they are a lucrative addressable audience for bankers.
The Fiserv sales pitch is working wonders according to the data. The company has 12,000 clients worldwide, with 85 million online banking end-users.
It has rolled out innovative products for payments, processing, risk and compliance, customer service and optimization.
The company has become ever so profitable with a 3-year EPS growth rate of just 15%, but in the last quarter, this metric surged to 23% and projected to rise.
Fiserv also dabbled with some M&A hauling in debit-based assets of Elan Financial Services.
The stellar acquisition, with annual revenue of over $170 million, extends Fiserv’s leadership in payments, broadens client reach and scale, and provides new solutions to enhance the value proposition of the existing 3,000 debit solutions clients.
The deal also gave Fiserv ownership of Money Pass, the second largest surcharge-free ATM network in the U.S., with over 33,000 in-network ATMs.
They also added other major pieces with the purchase of First Data Corp (FDC).
The maneuver is strategically solid, and Fiserv will benefit from a parlay of idiosyncratic opportunities from the combined synergies.
Fiserv will be able to refer First Data's merchant-acquiring services to the banks it currently works with.
I predict cost savings of $1 billion from the deal and potential upside from platform rationalization, which has not yet been included in synergies.
There will be significant upside potential from interest expense savings given refinancing FDC's debt at investment-grade.
Dipping your toe into this name before its multiple inevitable expands is a good long-term strategy.
Profitability is increasing while management has made moves that will fatten its top line business from the 5% internal growth today.
All these growth levers will push up revenues in the upcoming quarters - Fiserv happens to be the right company in the right industry at the perfect time in the technology cycle.
The stock is up over 1,000% in 10 years.
In February 2009, the stock was meddling around $8 and the $83 it trades at today demonstrates the potency of FinTech and the strength in their underlying business model.
I would wait for a sell-off to get into this one, but it’s a keeper.
Global Market Comments
February 4, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE MARKET FOR THE WEEK AHEAD, or FROM PANIC TO EUPHORIA),
(SPY), (TLT), (AAPL), (GLD),
What a difference a month makes!
In a mere 31 days, we lurched from the worst December in history to the best January in 30 years. Traders have gone from lining up to jump off the Golden Gate Bridge to ordering Dom Perignon Champaign on Market Street.
However, not everything is as it appears. The suicide prevention hotline on the bridge has been broken for years, and you can now pick up Dom Perignon at Costco for only $120 a bottle.
Clearly, investors are enjoying the show but are keeping one eye on the exit. Perhaps that’s why gold (GLD) hit an 8-month high as nervous investors Hoover up a downside hedge against their long positions.
In fact, it has been the best January since 1987, with a ferocious start. The problem with that analogy is that I remember what followed that year (see chart below). After a robust first nine months of the year, the Dow Average (INDU) broke the 50-day moving average. It looked like just another minor correction and a buying opportunity.
The market ended up plunging 42% in weeks including a terrifying 20% capitulation swan dive on the last day. I tried actually to buy the stock at the close that day. The clerk just burst into tears and threw the handset on the floor. I didn’t get filled. Since the tape was running two hours late, NOBODY got filled on any orders entered after 12:00 PM.
It doesn’t help that markets have been rising in the face of a collapsing earnings picture. Look at the chart below and you’ll see that after peaking out at an annualized 26% a year ago in the wake the passage of the new tax bill, earnings have been rolling over like the Bismarck on their way to zero.
If you own stocks anywhere in the world, this chart should have made the hair on the back of your neck stand up. It’s almost as if the tax bill was delivering the OPPOSITE of its intended outcome.
How multiple expansion will we get in the face of fading earnings? How about none? How about negative!
A totally red-hot January Nonfarm payroll Report on Friday at 304,000 confirmed that the economy was still alive and well, at least on a trailing basis. Headline Unemployment Rate rose to 4.0%.
The Labor Department said that the government shutdown had no impact on the numbers because federal employees were furloughed and not unemployed. Tomato, tomahto.
However, 175,000 workers were laid off in the private sector and that is why the Unemployment Rate ticked up to a multi-month high. Noise from the shutdown is going to be affecting all data for months.
That’s also why part-time workers jumped 500,000 in January. A lot of federal employees started working as Uber drivers and pizza delivery guys to put food on the table without a paycheck.
Further confusing matters was the fact that December was revised down by 90,000.
Leisure & Hospitality led the way with 74,000 new jobs, followed by Construction with 52,000 and Health Care by 42,000 jobs.
The shutdown is over, but how much did it cost us? Standard & Poor’s says $6 billion but the restart costs will be greater. More recent estimates run as high as $11 billion.
Weekly Jobless Claims were up a stunning 53,000, to 253,000, an 18-month high. While government workers can’t claim, their private subcontractors can, hence the massive shutdown-driven jump.
Bitcoin hits a new one-year low at $3,400. Some $400 billion has gone to money Heaven since 2017. Only $113 billion in market capitalization remains. I told you it was a Ponzi scheme. US coal production hits a 39-year low as it is steadily replaced by natural gas and solar. Could there be a connection? Talk about data mining.
Earnings were mixed, with some companies coming out hero’s, others as goats.
Apple (AAPL) slightly beat expectations with revenues at $84.31 billion versus $83.97 billion expected, and earnings at $4.18 per share versus $4.17 expected. Guidance going forward is very cautious of a slowing China.
Good thing I saw the ambush coming and covered my short two days ago. A penny beat is the most managed earnings I have ever seen. To warn about earnings and then surprise to the upside is classic Tim Cook.
December Pending Home Sales cratered, down 2.2% in December and 9.8% YOY. Despite the dramatically lower mortgage interest rates, buyers fled the crashing stock market.
“PATIENCE” is still the order of the day at the Federal Reserve with its Open Market Committee Meeting ordering no interest rate rise. It was a trifecta for the doves. The free pass for stocks continues. That’s why I covered all my shorts starting from last week. Even a blind squirrel occasionally finds an acorn.
Tesla reported another profit for the second consecutive quarter, and the company is about to reach escape velocity. Model 3 production in 2019 is to reach 75% of the total output and we can expect a new pickup truck. A second factory in Shanghai will take the “3” to over a half million units a year. That $35,000 Tesla is just over the horizon.
Why are all major companies reporting good earnings but cautious guidance? Are they reading the newspapers, or do they know something we don’t? Not a great sign of a continuing bull market. Sell the next capitulation top.
This week was a classic example of how the harder I work, the luckier I get, and I have been working pretty hard lately.
I came out of a near money Apple (AAPL) put spread at cost, then rolled into a far money put spread just before the stock sold off. That little maneuver made me $1,030 in two days.
Then, I spotted a perfect “head and shoulders” top in the bond market set up by a three-point rally in the (TLT). When the red hot January Nonfarm Payroll report printed the next day at 5:30 AM PCT, bonds immediately gave back a full point.
It was all enough to boost my performance to a new all-time high after a hiatus of two months. Those who recently signed up for my service must think that I am some kind of freakin' genius! They’ll learn the truth soon enough.
My January and 2019 year-to-date return soared to +9.66%, boosting my trailing one-year return back up to +29.24%. The is my hottest start to a New Year in a decade. Sometimes you have to make a sacrifice to the trading gods to get rewarded and that is what December was all about.
My nine-year return climbed up to +309.80%, a new pinnacle. The average annualized return revived to +33.79%.
I am now 80% in cash, short the bond market, and short Apple.
The upcoming week is still iffy on the data front because of the government shutdown. Some government data may be delayed and other completely missing. Private sources will continue reporting on schedule. All of the data will be completely skewed for at least the next three months. You can count on the shutdown to dominate all media until it is over.
Jobs data will be the big events over the coming five days along with some important housing numbers. We also have several heavies reporting earnings.
On Monday, February 4 at 10:00 AM, we get the much delayed December Factory Orders. Alphabet (GOOGL) reports.
On Tuesday, February 5, 10:00 AM EST, we learn the January ISM Non-Manufacturing Index.
On Wednesday, February 6 at 8:30 AM EST, the November Trade Balance is published.
Thursday, February 7 at 8:30 AM EST, we get Weekly Jobless Claims. December Consumer Credit follows at 9:30 AM and should be a humdinger. Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) reports.
On Friday, February 8, at 10:00 AM EST, Wholesale Inventories are out. The Baker-Hughes Rig Count follows at 1:00 PM.
As for me, I’ll be sitting down with a case of Modelo Negro and a big bag of Cheetos to watch the commercials during the Super Bowl with my family. (My dad played for USC Varsity in 1948). I never forgave the Rams for defecting from Los Angeles, and Boston is too far away to care about.
Good luck and good trading.
John Thomas
CEO & Publisher
The Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader
Are We in for a Repeat?
Global Market Comments
January 31, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(MARKET GETS A FREE PASS FROM THE FED),
(SPY), ($INDU), (TLT), (GLD), (FXE), (UUP),
(APPLE SEIZES VICTORY FROM THE JAWS OF DEFEAT),
(AAPL)
