Mad Hedge Technology Letter
February 6, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(ALPHABET WOWS THEM AGAIN),
(GOOGL), (AMZN), (AAPL), (MSFT)
Tag Archive for: (AAPL)
Alphabet (GOOGL) is entangled in the same imbroglio as Apple (AAPL), that is why I have held back on issuing any trade alerts on this name.
The stalwart is still grinding out a respectable 20% of revenue growth in their core business but the underlying conundrum is that their hyper-growth segments are 5 times or more diminutive than their bread and butter of digital ads.
Apple is addressing the same type of strain in attempting to flip high octane revenue drivers into a bigger piece of the pie – the services business trails the hardware business by a large margin.
This phenomenon highlights how investors demand tech companies to grow at elevated rates and a maturing business model isn’t given any free passes.
Investors simply migrate towards higher growth names period.
That being said, Alphabet’s digital ad business is one of the premier tech divisions in all of technology and the American economy.
How powerful is it?
They did $32.6 billion in sales last quarter.
If you look at that number without context, it is quite impressive, but there are several lurking impediments.
This 20% QOQ growth is flatter than a pancake offering evidence that the best days are behind them.
No investors like to hear the dreaded “P word” thrown into a company’s business trajectory – peak.
In respect to revenue growth rates, I expect Google’s digital ad business to gradually decline relative to competition.
This segment also battles with the law of large numbers.
It’s simply difficult to accelerate revenue rates at a 25% YOY clip when revenues are already over $30 billion per quarter. Again, this is another Apple problem and a side effect of being overly successful in one part of the business model.
If investors' tepid reaction about these aspects of the core business telegraph dissatisfaction, then discovering further ancillary problems might be the final dagger in the heart.
Google search’s price per click cratered 29% YOY indicating that variables in the current marketing environment have significantly blunted Google’s pricing power.
Traffic Acquisition Cost (TAC) represents the cost for a company to acquire internet traffic onto their assets.
Alphabet faced a 15% YOY rise in TAC costs last quarter to $7.44 billion illustrating the difficulty in keeping these high costs down.
The bulk of the $7.44 billion stems from a widely known agreement with Apple contracting Google search as its default search engine on Apple devices.
This TAC expense has been surging the past few years and Alphabet has little negotiating power.
Expect an annual 15-20% rise in TAC expenses as long as Alphabet’s digital ads are expanding the standard vanilla 20% most investors expect them to grow.
As a whole, TAC costs soaked up 23% of the digital ad revenue which was in line with analysts’ expectations.
However, I expect this number to surpass 25% before winter because I believe Google search’s ad business will confront ceaseless growth problems.
Amazon’s (AMZN) new-found digital ad business is an influential factor in this story.
New marketing dollars aren’t being showered on Google as they once were, over 50% of product searches populate from Amazon.com today boding poorly for the future of Google search.
This optionality could be a large reason in driving the cost per click downwards.
CEO of Amazon Jeff Bezos refused to enter the digital ad game for years but his recent change of heart will correlate to subduing Google digital ad model.
Consumers are finding less incentive to search on Google for products when they just can smartly and efficiently search on Amazon directly.
Clearly, this only affects product searches and not searches on other informative content such as widely popular searches including “top 10 places to travel in Europe” or “best Thanksgiving recipes.”
Google’s “other revenues” is chugging along nicely with 31% YOY growth headed by Google’s cloud business and hardware division.
This is what Alphabet needs to focus on going forward similar to Microsoft and Amazon web services.
Yes, Google is the 3rd biggest cloud player but miles behind the top two.
Being in catch-up mode is no fun and is part of the reason capital expenditures exploded and came in $1.38 billion higher than expected.
Alphabet simply isn’t doing a good job at executing relative to Amazon and Microsoft frittering away more capital in the name of growth but not curating the type of growth that current expenses justify.
Higher costs damaged operating margins coming down 2% YOY to 21%.
Even more worrisome is that there has been no material progress on the Waymo business.
This is the year that Alphabet expected the technology to roll out to the masses.
However, this broad-based integration will not happen as fast as they would like.
I blame regulation and consumers' hesitation to quickly adopt this new technology.
Alphabet is reliant on this business to carry them to the next level of growth and I believe it can become a $100 billion per year business in a $2 trillion addressable market.
But when you peruse through the “Other Bets” category which houses Alphabet’s other companies such as health venture Verily, the $154 million in revenue was a huge miss against the $187.4 million expected.
Estimates aside, the pitiful fact that Waymo only brings in revenue of less than 1% of total revenue is disappointing.
Summing things up, Alphabet is a great company and is a long-term buy and hold stock even with short term transitory headaches.
In the near term, there is uneasiness about the decreasing profitability, exploding expense factors, a heavy reliance on weakening core business revenue, and a lack of top-line contribution of “other revenues” relative to their core business.
Long term, Alphabet’s game-changing investments have yet to show signs of life in terms of real revenue expansion even though Alphabet is the global leader of artificial intelligence and self-driving technology.
Investors would like to see actionable steps to incorporate this best of breed technology that funnels down to the top and bottom line.
Investors are stuck with a stale digital ads business that has locked the stock into a holding pattern essentially trading sideways for the past year until they prove they are ready to take the next step up.
Looking at Alphabet’s chart, the stock has iron-clad support at $1,000 which it tested in April 2018 and December 2018.
Using this entry point as the lower range would be sensible as I don’t foresee any demonstrably negative news blindsiding the stock, and I surmise that investors will start receiving positive news on Waymo’s roll out towards the middle of the year.
Global Market Comments
February 5, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(A NOTE ON OPTIONS CALLED AWAY)
(TLT), (AAPL),
(THE GOVERNMENT’S COMING WAR ON MONEY)
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
February 5, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE FINTECH COMPANY YOU’VE NEVER HEARD OF),
(FISV), (AAPL), (GOOGL), (FDC), (PYPL), (SQ)
Here’s a company for you involved in technology’s tectonic shift towards FinTech in 2019.
They aren’t new, but you’ve probably never heard of them.
It’s Fiserv Inc. (FISV) which sells financial technology and can include customers such as banks, credit unions, securities broker-dealers, leasing, and finance companies.
An inflection point is occurring within the global business and that is financial technology and the rapid integration of it.
Financial institutions are building products around this concept and Fiserv has a head start on the others with more than 30 years of experience in aiding banks, thrifts, and credit unions, managing cash and processing payments, loans, and account services.
The Wisconsin-based company constructed an unstoppable machine leveraging its time-honored relationships and expertise to bring banking to all the screens that pervade daily life.
“Innovation, Integration and Scale” has been the motto that has served this company well for so long.
The company cut its teeth in the trenches helping banks move money long before it became the next big thing.
Five years ago, under the leadership of CEO Jeff Yabuki, there was a corporate flashpoint with upper management realizing they needed to evolve or die.
Yabuki anticipated a near future fueled by mobile wallets and changing consumer expectations - an always-on, never-off connected world.
An environment where consumers want what they want when they want it.
There has been no letup in this trend.
Silicon Valley companies were always the 800-pound gorilla in the room and Fiserv didn’t want to become sideswiped by them.
And in 2014, at the Money 20/20 conference in Las Vegas, Yabuki set out his vision that continues to prevail today.
The financial services industry had become obsessed with point-of-sale transactions.
And at $200 billion in annual domestic sales, it was a business that resonated to all corners of the FinTech world.
It was sensical to persuade consumers to use branded credit or debit cards to pay for stuff in stores and online.
At the time, that was bread-and-butter banking.
To the banks' chagrin, Silicon Valley has gotten in on the act with the likes of Apple (AAPL), Alphabet (GOOGL), PayPal (PYPL), Square (SQ) firing warning shots.
They formulated products of their own, whipped up the necessary scale and maximized the reverberating network effects.
Yabuki urged financiers at the conference to double down on what they did best while looking to grab low-hanging fruits in the short-term.
The business beyond point-of-sale was theirs waiting on a decorative platter – the opportunity was a $55 billion behemoth consisting of consumer-to-consumer, business-to-business and consumer-to-business transactions.
Embracing FinTech translated into massive speed advantages, stauncher security-laced products while offering traditional bank customers higher quality service at their convenience.
Fiserv erected a platform to help financial institutions focus on payments beyond POS called Network for Our World.
The goal of this NOW Network was to help customers' flow of money by paying bills and getting paid.
These entrepreneurs are looking for more efficient ways to collect money owed - they are a lucrative addressable audience for bankers.
The Fiserv sales pitch is working wonders according to the data. The company has 12,000 clients worldwide, with 85 million online banking end-users.
It has rolled out innovative products for payments, processing, risk and compliance, customer service and optimization.
The company has become ever so profitable with a 3-year EPS growth rate of just 15%, but in the last quarter, this metric surged to 23% and projected to rise.
Fiserv also dabbled with some M&A hauling in debit-based assets of Elan Financial Services.
The stellar acquisition, with annual revenue of over $170 million, extends Fiserv’s leadership in payments, broadens client reach and scale, and provides new solutions to enhance the value proposition of the existing 3,000 debit solutions clients.
The deal also gave Fiserv ownership of Money Pass, the second largest surcharge-free ATM network in the U.S., with over 33,000 in-network ATMs.
They also added other major pieces with the purchase of First Data Corp (FDC).
The maneuver is strategically solid, and Fiserv will benefit from a parlay of idiosyncratic opportunities from the combined synergies.
Fiserv will be able to refer First Data's merchant-acquiring services to the banks it currently works with.
I predict cost savings of $1 billion from the deal and potential upside from platform rationalization, which has not yet been included in synergies.
There will be significant upside potential from interest expense savings given refinancing FDC's debt at investment-grade.
Dipping your toe into this name before its multiple inevitable expands is a good long-term strategy.
Profitability is increasing while management has made moves that will fatten its top line business from the 5% internal growth today.
All these growth levers will push up revenues in the upcoming quarters - Fiserv happens to be the right company in the right industry at the perfect time in the technology cycle.
The stock is up over 1,000% in 10 years.
In February 2009, the stock was meddling around $8 and the $83 it trades at today demonstrates the potency of FinTech and the strength in their underlying business model.
I would wait for a sell-off to get into this one, but it’s a keeper.
Global Market Comments
February 4, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE MARKET FOR THE WEEK AHEAD, or FROM PANIC TO EUPHORIA),
(SPY), (TLT), (AAPL), (GLD),
What a difference a month makes!
In a mere 31 days, we lurched from the worst December in history to the best January in 30 years. Traders have gone from lining up to jump off the Golden Gate Bridge to ordering Dom Perignon Champaign on Market Street.
However, not everything is as it appears. The suicide prevention hotline on the bridge has been broken for years, and you can now pick up Dom Perignon at Costco for only $120 a bottle.
Clearly, investors are enjoying the show but are keeping one eye on the exit. Perhaps that’s why gold (GLD) hit an 8-month high as nervous investors Hoover up a downside hedge against their long positions.
In fact, it has been the best January since 1987, with a ferocious start. The problem with that analogy is that I remember what followed that year (see chart below). After a robust first nine months of the year, the Dow Average (INDU) broke the 50-day moving average. It looked like just another minor correction and a buying opportunity.
The market ended up plunging 42% in weeks including a terrifying 20% capitulation swan dive on the last day. I tried actually to buy the stock at the close that day. The clerk just burst into tears and threw the handset on the floor. I didn’t get filled. Since the tape was running two hours late, NOBODY got filled on any orders entered after 12:00 PM.
It doesn’t help that markets have been rising in the face of a collapsing earnings picture. Look at the chart below and you’ll see that after peaking out at an annualized 26% a year ago in the wake the passage of the new tax bill, earnings have been rolling over like the Bismarck on their way to zero.
If you own stocks anywhere in the world, this chart should have made the hair on the back of your neck stand up. It’s almost as if the tax bill was delivering the OPPOSITE of its intended outcome.
How multiple expansion will we get in the face of fading earnings? How about none? How about negative!
A totally red-hot January Nonfarm payroll Report on Friday at 304,000 confirmed that the economy was still alive and well, at least on a trailing basis. Headline Unemployment Rate rose to 4.0%.
The Labor Department said that the government shutdown had no impact on the numbers because federal employees were furloughed and not unemployed. Tomato, tomahto.
However, 175,000 workers were laid off in the private sector and that is why the Unemployment Rate ticked up to a multi-month high. Noise from the shutdown is going to be affecting all data for months.
That’s also why part-time workers jumped 500,000 in January. A lot of federal employees started working as Uber drivers and pizza delivery guys to put food on the table without a paycheck.
Further confusing matters was the fact that December was revised down by 90,000.
Leisure & Hospitality led the way with 74,000 new jobs, followed by Construction with 52,000 and Health Care by 42,000 jobs.
The shutdown is over, but how much did it cost us? Standard & Poor’s says $6 billion but the restart costs will be greater. More recent estimates run as high as $11 billion.
Weekly Jobless Claims were up a stunning 53,000, to 253,000, an 18-month high. While government workers can’t claim, their private subcontractors can, hence the massive shutdown-driven jump.
Bitcoin hits a new one-year low at $3,400. Some $400 billion has gone to money Heaven since 2017. Only $113 billion in market capitalization remains. I told you it was a Ponzi scheme. US coal production hits a 39-year low as it is steadily replaced by natural gas and solar. Could there be a connection? Talk about data mining.
Earnings were mixed, with some companies coming out hero’s, others as goats.
Apple (AAPL) slightly beat expectations with revenues at $84.31 billion versus $83.97 billion expected, and earnings at $4.18 per share versus $4.17 expected. Guidance going forward is very cautious of a slowing China.
Good thing I saw the ambush coming and covered my short two days ago. A penny beat is the most managed earnings I have ever seen. To warn about earnings and then surprise to the upside is classic Tim Cook.
December Pending Home Sales cratered, down 2.2% in December and 9.8% YOY. Despite the dramatically lower mortgage interest rates, buyers fled the crashing stock market.
“PATIENCE” is still the order of the day at the Federal Reserve with its Open Market Committee Meeting ordering no interest rate rise. It was a trifecta for the doves. The free pass for stocks continues. That’s why I covered all my shorts starting from last week. Even a blind squirrel occasionally finds an acorn.
Tesla reported another profit for the second consecutive quarter, and the company is about to reach escape velocity. Model 3 production in 2019 is to reach 75% of the total output and we can expect a new pickup truck. A second factory in Shanghai will take the “3” to over a half million units a year. That $35,000 Tesla is just over the horizon.
Why are all major companies reporting good earnings but cautious guidance? Are they reading the newspapers, or do they know something we don’t? Not a great sign of a continuing bull market. Sell the next capitulation top.
This week was a classic example of how the harder I work, the luckier I get, and I have been working pretty hard lately.
I came out of a near money Apple (AAPL) put spread at cost, then rolled into a far money put spread just before the stock sold off. That little maneuver made me $1,030 in two days.
Then, I spotted a perfect “head and shoulders” top in the bond market set up by a three-point rally in the (TLT). When the red hot January Nonfarm Payroll report printed the next day at 5:30 AM PCT, bonds immediately gave back a full point.
It was all enough to boost my performance to a new all-time high after a hiatus of two months. Those who recently signed up for my service must think that I am some kind of freakin' genius! They’ll learn the truth soon enough.
My January and 2019 year-to-date return soared to +9.66%, boosting my trailing one-year return back up to +29.24%. The is my hottest start to a New Year in a decade. Sometimes you have to make a sacrifice to the trading gods to get rewarded and that is what December was all about.
My nine-year return climbed up to +309.80%, a new pinnacle. The average annualized return revived to +33.79%.
I am now 80% in cash, short the bond market, and short Apple.
The upcoming week is still iffy on the data front because of the government shutdown. Some government data may be delayed and other completely missing. Private sources will continue reporting on schedule. All of the data will be completely skewed for at least the next three months. You can count on the shutdown to dominate all media until it is over.
Jobs data will be the big events over the coming five days along with some important housing numbers. We also have several heavies reporting earnings.
On Monday, February 4 at 10:00 AM, we get the much delayed December Factory Orders. Alphabet (GOOGL) reports.
On Tuesday, February 5, 10:00 AM EST, we learn the January ISM Non-Manufacturing Index.
On Wednesday, February 6 at 8:30 AM EST, the November Trade Balance is published.
Thursday, February 7 at 8:30 AM EST, we get Weekly Jobless Claims. December Consumer Credit follows at 9:30 AM and should be a humdinger. Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) reports.
On Friday, February 8, at 10:00 AM EST, Wholesale Inventories are out. The Baker-Hughes Rig Count follows at 1:00 PM.
As for me, I’ll be sitting down with a case of Modelo Negro and a big bag of Cheetos to watch the commercials during the Super Bowl with my family. (My dad played for USC Varsity in 1948). I never forgave the Rams for defecting from Los Angeles, and Boston is too far away to care about.
Good luck and good trading.
John Thomas
CEO & Publisher
The Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader
Are We in for a Repeat?
Global Market Comments
January 31, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(MARKET GETS A FREE PASS FROM THE FED),
(SPY), ($INDU), (TLT), (GLD), (FXE), (UUP),
(APPLE SEIZES VICTORY FROM THE JAWS OF DEFEAT),
(AAPL)
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
January 31, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(APPLE SEIZES VICTORY FROM THE JAWS OF DEFEAT),
(AAPL)
After an almost 40% swan dive, Apple has found solid footing at these levels for the time being. 40% seems to be the magic number. Declines ALWAYS end at 40% with Apple.
About time!
It’s been an erratic last few months for the company that Steve Jobs built and this last earnings report will go a long way to somewhat stabilize the short-term share price.
The miniscule earnings beat telegraphs to investors that the bad news has been sucked out.
That is what Tim Cook wants the investor community to think.
But is he right?
I would argue that the bad news is over for the short-term but could rear its ugly head again later – it all rides on China’s shoulders.
Let’s take a look at the numbers.
Chinese revenue was down 27% YOY locking in $13.17 billion in quarterly revenue compared to $17.96 billion the prior year.
There is no two ways about this – it’s an awful number and a hurtful manifestation of the Chinese economy decelerating.
The unrelenting pressure of the geopolitical trade war has handcuffed Beijing’s drive to deleverage its balance sheet and steer its economy to a more consumption-supportive model.
China is lamentably back to its traditional ways - the old economy - infusing $2.2 trillion into its balance sheet along with cutting the reserve ratio for state banks hoping to incite economic growth.
Positive short-term catalyst but negative long-term consequences.
This is why I urged Apple lovers to stay away from this stock earlier because of the uncertainty of its current strategic position.
It makes no sense to place an indirect on the current Washington administration navigating a China soft landing.
As it stands, most of Apple’s supply chain is in China and moving it out will be done in piecemeal which is happening behind the scenes and will cause massive job loss in China further hurting the Chinese economy.
The ratcheting up of tensions signals the untenable end of American tech supply chains in China and no new foreign investment will pour into China.
Maybe even never.
I wholeheartedly blame CEO of Apple Tim Cook for not foreseeing this development.
That is what he is paid to do.
Then there is the issue of iPhone sales in China.
Chinese citizens aren’t buying iPhones because of three reasons.
The cohort of wealthy Chinese who can afford a $1,000 iPhone might think twice if they want to be seen outside with a product from a country that is becoming adversarial. Apple has incurred hard-to-quantify brand damage to its once pristine brand in a land that once worshipped the company.
The refresh cycle has elongated because Apple manufactures great smartphones and iPhone holders are waiting it out on the sidelines two or even three iterations down the road to upgrade because that is when they can unearth the relative value of the product.
Lastly, local Chinese smartphone markers have greatly enhanced their products because of a function of time and borrowed Western technology. It is now possible to buy a smartphone that offers around 80% of performance and functionality of an iPhone but for less than half the price.
The customers on the fence who once viewed iPhones as a must-buy are now migrating to the local Chinese competitor because they are a relatively good deal.
I can surmise that these three headwinds are just beginning and will become more entrenched over time.
If the trade war becomes worse, the brand damage will accelerate. iPhones are becoming incrementally better which will delay new iPhone upgrades unless something revolutionary comes out that requires customers to upgrade to be a part of the new technology.
And sadly, Chinese competition is catching up quicker than Apple can innovate and that will not stop.
However, the silver lining is that the worst-case scenario won’t happen in the next quarter and the market won’t get wind of this until the second half of the year.
Instead of a meaningful sell-off because of this earnings report, Cook chose to front-run the weakness by reporting the hideous performance at the beginning of January.
Cook knew he needed to come clean with the negative news and the reformulated projections that were re-laid a few weeks ago were the same ones that Apple barely beat by one cent on the bottom line by posting EPS of $4.18 and marginally on the top line by $420 million.
I am in no way saying that this was a great earnings report – it wasn’t.
Apple mainly delivered on the mediocrity that they discussed a few weeks ago lowering the bar to the point where it would be a failure of epic proportions if Apple couldn’t beat significantly revised down earnings.
Then the outlook for the next quarter wasn’t as bad as people thought, but that doesn’t mean it was good.
When you start playing the game of not as bad as the market thought – it is a slippery slope to head down and halfway to the CEO getting sacked down the road.
I mentioned before that the macro headwinds came 2 years too early for Cook and pegging 60% of company revenue to a smartphone which has trended towards mass commoditization is a bad bet.
Cook has been painstakingly slow rewriting Apple as a service company which is his current get-out-of-jail-free card dangling in front of him like a juicy carrot.
iPhone gross margin is now 34.3% which is lower than the other Apple products whose margins are 38%.
Their flagship product isn’t as profitable on a per-unit basis as it once was highlighting the necessity for refreshing the product lines with not just new iterations but game-changing products.
The type of products that Steve Jobs used to mushroom popularity would suffice.
Gross margins will continue to come down as the smartphone market is saturated and customers won’t buy iPhones now unless they receive a drastic price reduction.
The result is that Apple no longer publishes iPhone unit sales to conceal the worst number for their most important and volume-heavy product.
A little too late if you tell me and irresponsible to investor transparency if you ask me.
Apple Pay, Apple Music, and iCloud storage eclipsed $10.9 billion demonstrating a 19% YOY increase.
This shows that this company still has strengths, but don’t forget that services are still less than 15% of total revenue even though they are the fastest growth part of their portfolio.
Cook isn’t doing enough to supercharge the content and services at Apple.
The top line number was $84.3 billion, a 5% YOY decline in revenue – a YOY decline hasn’t happened in 18 years and this is deeply troublesome.
Let me explain why Cook is the center of the problem.
The underlying issue is Cook doesn’t know what product should be next for Apple.
Apple dabbled with the Apple TV which didn’t pan out.
Then the autonomous vehicle unit just closed down sacking 200 employees.
And the content side of it hasn’t been developed fast enough relative to the slowing down of iPhone sales which is why you can blame Cook for being reactive instead of proactive.
It’s not like he can claim that his head was in the sand and couldn’t take note of what Netflix was doing and had gotten into that original content game sooner.
The hesitation is exactly what worries me with Cook. Cook is a great operations guy and can take an existing product, beef up margins, shave down expenses, streamline execution and boost top and bottom line profits.
Cook is being painfully exposed now that he is out of his comfort zone and must aggressively move in a direction that doesn’t have a red carpet laid out for him.
Even though the pre-earnings red flag raised many questions, Cook only satisfied these red flags on a short-term basis and Apple still needs to reconfigure its product roadmap for the long term.
If Cook plans to milk more out of the iPhone story, Apple becomes a sell the rallies stock, but the market will give the benefit of the doubt to Apple for a quarter or so.
The 800-pound gorilla in the room is the Chinese economy which could go into a hard landing if the stimulus fails to deliver economic respite or if the trade war tensions are exacerbated.
At the bare minimum, the waterfall of downgrades should be over for the time being, but this will come to the fore in a quarter or so when Apple will need to shine light on its plans moving forward.
I wouldn’t bet the ranch on Cook being innovative.
It looks like Apple will start to trade in a range.
It’s hard to believe any bad news superseding what came out at the beginning of this month in the short-term, but at the same time, there are no idiosyncratic catalysts to cause this stock to bullishly break out.
We are at an inflection point in Cook’s career and he is finding out that it's not as easy to be Apple as it used to, and mammoth decisions are on the horizon that must be addressed or possibly become the next IBM.
If you ask me, I’ve been calling on Apple to replace Cook for a while with Jack Dorsey as the signal caller, I still believe this is the only way to stay in the heavyweight division of tech titans five years from now.
Such is the competitive nature of the tech landscape these days.
