Not a day goes by when someone doesn’t ask me about what to do about Apple (AAPL).
After all, it is the world largest company. It is the planet’s most widely owned stock. Almost everyone uses their products in some form or another.
So, the widespread interest is totally understandable.
Apple is a company with which I have a very long relationship. During the early 1980s, I was ordered by Morgan Stanley to take Steve Jobs around to the big New York Institutional Investors to pitch a secondary share offer for the sole reason that I was one of three people who worked for the firm who was then from California.
They thought one West Coast hippy would easily get along with another. Boy, were they wrong. It was the worst day of my life. Steve was not a guy who palled around with anyone.
Today, some 200 Apple employees subscribe to the Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader looking to diversify their substantial holdings. Many own Apple stock with an adjusted cost basis of under $5. Suffice it to say, they all drive really nice Priuses.
So I get a lot of information about the firm far above and beyond the normal effluent of the media and stock analysts. That’s why Apple has become a favorite target of my Trade Alerts over the years.
And here is the take: You didn’t want to touch the stock during the last quarter of 2018.
And here’s why. Apple is all about the iPhone which accounts for 75% of its total earnings. The TV, the watch, the car, iPods, the iMac, and Apple pay are all a waste of time and consume far more coverage than they are collectively worth.
The good news is that iPhone sales are subject to a fairly reliable cycle. Apple launches a major new iPhone every other fall. The share price peaks shortly after that. The odd years see minor upgrades, not generational changes.
Just like you see a big pullback in the tide before a tsunami hits, iPhone sales are flattening out. This is because consumers start delaying purchases in expectation of the introduction of the iPhone 7 in September 2016 with far more power, gadgets, and gizmos.
Channel checks, however dubious these may be, are already confirming the slowdown of orders for iPhone-related semiconductors from suppliers you would expect from such a downturn.
So during those in-between years, the stock performance is disappointing. 2018 certainly followed this script with Apple down a horrific 30.13% at the lows. Maybe it’s a coincidence, but that last generation in Apple shares in 2015 brought a decline of, you guessed it, exactly 29.33%.
The coming quarter could bring the opposite.
After March, things will start to get interesting especially post the Q1 earnings report in April. That’s when investors will start to discount the rollout of the next iPhone seven months later.
The last time this happened, in 2018, Apple stock rocketed by $86, or 55.33%. This time, I expect a minimum rally to the old $233 high, a gain of $71, or 43.82%.
After all, I am such a conservative guy with my predictions.
Even at that price, it will still be one of the cheapest stocks in the market on a valuation basis which currently trades at a 14X earnings multiple. The value players will have no choice to join in, if they’re not already there.
But Apple is a much bigger company this time around, and well-established cycles tend to bring in diminishing returns. It’s like watching the declining peaks of a bouncing rubber ball.
The bull case for Apple isn’t dead, it is just resting.
The China business will continue to grow nicely once we get through the current trade war. Their new lease program promises to deliver a faster upgrade cycle that will allow higher premium prices for their products. That will bring larger profits.
Just thought you’d like to know.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2018-12-27 01:08:082018-12-26 18:31:24How to Play Apple in 2019
There is only so much juice you can squeeze from a lemon before nothing is left.
Silicon Valley has been focused mainly on squeezing the juice out of the Internet for the past 30 years with intense focus on the American consumer.
In an era of minimal regulation, companies grew at breakneck speeds right into families' living quarters and it was a win-win proposition for both the user and the Internet.
The cream of the crop ideas was found briskly and the low hanging fruit was pocketed by the venture capitalists (VCs).
That was then, and this is now.
No longer will VCs simply invest in various start-ups and 10 years later a Facebook (FB) or Alphabet (GOOGL) appears out of thin air.
That story is over. Facebook was the last one in the door.
VCs will become more selective because brilliant ideas must withstand the passage of time. Companies want to continue to be relevant in 20 or 30 years and not just disintegrate into obsolescence as did the Eastman Kodak Company, the doomed maker of silver-based film.
The San Francisco Bay Area is the mecca of technology but recent indicators have presaged the upcoming trends that will reshape the industry.
In general, a healthy and booming local real estate sector is a net positive creating paper wealth for its local people and attracting money slated for expansion.
However, it's crystal clear the net positive has flipped and housing is now a buzzword for the maladies young people face to sustain themselves in the ultra-expensive coastal Northern California megacities.
The loss of tax deductions in the recent tax bill makes conditions even more draconian.
Monthly rental costs are deterring tech's future minions. Without the droves of talent flooding the area, it becomes harder for the industry to incrementally expand.
It also boosts the costs of existing development/operations staffers whose capital feeds back into the local housing market buying whatever they can barely afford for astronomical prices.
Another price spike ensues with first-time home buyers piling into already bare-bones inventory because of the fear of missing out (FOMO).
After surveying HR tech heads, it's clear there aren't enough artificial intelligence (A.I.) programmers and coders to fill internal projects.
Compounding the housing crisis is the change of immigration policy that has frightened off many future Silicon Valley workers.
There is no surprise that millions of aspiring foreign students wish to take advantage of America's treasure of higher education because there is nothing comparable at home.
The best and brightest foreign minds are trained in America and a mass exodus would create an even fiercer deficit for global dev-ops talent.
These U.S.-trained foreign tech workers are the main drivers of foreign tech start-ups.
Dangling carrots and sticks for a chance to start an embryonic project in the cozy confines of home is hard to pass up.
Ironically enough, there are more A.I. computer scientists of Chinese origin in America than there are in all of China.
There is a huge movement by the Chinese private sector to bring everyone back home as China vies to become the industry leader in A.I.
Silicon Valley is on the verge of a brain drain of mythical proportions.
If America allows all these brilliant minds to fly home not only to China but everywhere else, America is just training these workers to compete against American workers.
A premier example is Baidu co-founder Robin Li who received his master's degree in computer science from the State University of New York at Buffalo in 1994.
After graduation, his first job was at Dow Jones & Company, a subsidiary of News Corp., writing code for the online version of the Wall Street Journal.
During this stint, he developed an algorithm for ranking search results that he patented, flew back to China, created the Google search engine equivalent, and named it Baidu (BIDU).
Robin Li is now one of the richest people in China with a fortune of close to $20 billion.
To show it's not just a one-hit-wonder type scenario, three of the top five start-ups are currently headquartered in Beijing and not in California.
The most powerful industry in America's economy is just a transient training hub for foreign nationals before they go home to make the real moola.
More than 70% of tech employees in Silicon Valley and more than 50% in the San Francisco Bay Area are foreign, according to the 2016 census data.
Adding insult to injury, the exorbitant cost of housing is preventing burgeoning American talent from migrating from rural towns across America and moving to the Bay Area.
They make it as far West as Salt Lake City, Reno, or Las Vegas.
Instead of living a homeless life in Golden Gate Park, they decide to set up shop in a second-tier American city after horror stories of Bay Area housing starts to populate their friends' Instagram feeds and are shared a million times over.
This trend was reinforced by domestic migration statistics.
Between 2007 and 2016, 5 million people moved to California, and 6 million people moved out of the state.
The biggest takeaways are that many of these new California migrants are from New York, possess graduate degrees, and command an annual salary of more than $110,000.
Conversely, Nevada, Arizona, and Texas have major inflows of migrants that mostly earn less than $50,000 per year and are less educated.
That will change in the near future.
Ultimately, if VCs think it is expensive now to operate a start-up in Silicon Valley, it will be costlier in the future.
Pouring gasoline on the flames, Northern California schools are starting to fold like a house of cards due to minimal household formation wiping out student numbers.
The dire shortage of affordable housing is the region's No. 1 problem.
A 1,066-sq.-ft. property in San Jose's Willow Glen neighborhood went on sale for $800,000.
This would be considered an absolute steal at this price but the catch is the house was badly burned two years ago. This is the price for a teardown.
When you combine the housing crisis with the price readjustment for big data, it looks as if Silicon Valley has peaked or at the very least, it's not cheap.
Yes, the FANGs will continue their gravy train but the next big thing to hit tech will not originate from California.
VCs will overwhelmingly invest in data over rental bills. The percolation of tech ingenuity will likely pop up in either Nevada, Arizona, Texas, Utah, or yes, even Michigan.
Even though these states attract poorer migrants, the lower cost of housing is beginning to attract tech professionals who can afford more than a burned down shack.
Washington state has become a hotbed for bitcoin activity. Small rural counties set in the Columbia Basin such as Chelan, Douglas, and Grant used to be farmland.
The bitcoin industry moved three hours east of Seattle for one reason and one reason only - cost.
Electricity is five times cheaper there because of fluid access to plentiful hydro-electric power.
Many business decisions come down to cost, and a fractional advantage of pennies.
Globalization has supercharged competition, and technology is the lubricant fueling competition to new heights.
Once millennials desire to form families, the only choices are regions where housing costs are affordable and areas that aren't bereft of tech talent.
Cities such as Las Vegas and Reno in Nevada; Austin, Texas; Phoenix, Arizona; and Salt Lake City, Utah, will turn into hotbeds of West Coast growth engines just as Hangzhou, China-based Alibaba (BABA) turned that city into more than a sleepy backwater town with a big lake at its center.
The overarching theme of decentralizing is taking the world by storm. The built-up power levers in Northern California are overheated, and the decentralization process will take many years to flow into the direction of these smaller but growing cities.
Salt Lake City, known as Silicon Slopes, has been a tech magnet of late with big players such as Adobe (ADBE), Twitter (TWTR), and EA Sports (EA) opening new branches there while Reno has become a massive hotspot for data server farms. Nearby Sparks hosts Tesla's Gigafactory 1 along with massive data centers for Apple, Alphabet, and Switch.
The half a billion-dollars required to build a proper tech company will stretch further in Austin or Las Vegas, and most of the funds will be reserved for tech talent - not slum landlords.
The nail in the coffin will be the millions saved in state taxes.
The rise of the second-tier cities is the key to staying ahead of the race for tech supremacy.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2018-12-26 03:06:542018-12-26 03:03:44The High Cost of Driving Out Our Foreign Technologists
If you've been living under a rock the past few years, the cloud phenomenon hasn't passed you by and you still have time to cash in.
You want to hitch your wagon to cloud-based investments in any way, shape or form.
Microsoft's (MSFT) pivot to its Azure enterprise business has sent its stock skyward, and it is poised to rake in more than $100 billion in cloud revenue over the next 10 years.
Microsoft's share of the cloud market rose from 10% to 13% and is catching up to Amazon Web Services (AWS).
Amazon leads the cloud industry it created and the 49% growth in cloud sales from 42% in Q3 2017 is a welcome sign that Amazon is not tripping up.
It still maintains more than 30% of the cloud market. Microsoft would need to gain a lot of ground to even come close to this jewel of a business.
Amazon (AMZN) relies on AWS to underpin the rest of its businesses and that is why AWS contributes 73% to Amazon's total operating income.
Total revenue for just the AWS division is an annual $5.5 billion business and would operate as a healthy stand-alone tech company if need be.
Cloud revenue is even starting to account for a noticeable share of Apple's (AAPL) earnings, which has previously bet the ranch on hardware products.
The future is about the cloud.
These days, the average investor probably hears about the cloud a dozen times a day. If you work in Silicon Valley you can triple that figure.
So, before we get deep into the weeds with this letter on cloud services, cloud fundamentals, cloud plays, and cloud Trade Alerts, let's get into the basics of what the cloud actually is.
Think of this as a cloud primer.
It's important to understand the cloud, both its strengths and limitations. Giant companies that have it figured out, such as Salesforce (CRM) and Zscaler (ZS), are some of the fastest growing companies in the world.
Understand the cloud and you will readily identify its bottlenecks and bulges that can lead to extreme investment opportunities. And that's where I come in.
Cloud storage refers to the online space where you can store data. It resides across multiple remote servers housed inside massive data centers all over the country, some as large as football fields, often in rural areas where land, labor, and electricity are cheap.
They are built using virtualization technology, which means that storage space spans across many different servers and multiple locations. If this sounds crazy, remember that the original Department of Defense packet-switching design was intended to make the system atomic bomb proof.
As a user, you can access any single server at any one time anywhere in the world. These servers are owned, maintained and operated by giant third-party companies such as Amazon, Microsoft, and Alphabet (GOOGL), which may or may not charge a fee for using them.
The most important features of cloud storage are:
1) It is a service provided by an external provider.
2) All data is stored outside your computer residing inside an in-house network.
3) A simple Internet connection will allow you to access your data at any time from anywhere.
4) Because of all these features, sharing data with others is vastly easier, and you can even work with multiple people online at the same time, making it the perfect, collaborative vehicle for our globalized world.
Once you start using the cloud to store a company's data, the benefits are many.
No Maintenance
Many companies, regardless of their size, prefer to store data inside in-house servers and data centers.
However, these require constant 24-hour-a-day maintenance, so the company has to employ a large in-house IT staff to manage them - a costly proposition.
Thanks to cloud storage, businesses can save costs on maintenance since their servers are now the headache of third-party providers.
Instead, they can focus resources on the core aspects of their business where they can add the most value, without worrying about managing IT staff of prima donnas.
Greater Flexibility
Today's employees want to have a better work/life balance and this goal can be best achieved by letting them telecommute. Increasingly, workers are bending their jobs to fit their lifestyles, and that is certainly the case here at Mad Hedge Fund Trader.
How else can I send off a Trade Alert while hanging from the face of a Swiss Alp?
Cloud storage services, such as Google Drive, offer exactly this kind of flexibility for employees. According to a recent survey, 79% of respondents already work outside of their office some of the time, while another 60% would switch jobs if offered this flexibility.
With data stored online, it's easy for employees to log into a cloud portal, work on the data they need to, and then log off when they're done. This way a single project can be worked on by a global team, the work handed off from time zone to time zone until it's done.
It also makes them work more efficiently, saving money for penny-pinching entrepreneurs.
Better Collaboration and Communication
In today's business environment, it's common practice for employees to collaborate and communicate with co-workers located around the world.
For example, they may have to work on the same client proposal together or provide feedback on training documents. Cloud-based tools from DocuSign, Dropbox, and Google Drive make collaboration and document management a piece of cake.
These products, which all offer free entry-level versions, allow users to access the latest versions of any document so they can stay on top of real-time changes which can help businesses to better manage workflow, regardless of geographical location.
Data Protection
Another important reason to move to the cloud is for better protection of your data, especially in the event of a natural disaster. Hurricane Sandy wreaked havoc on local data centers in New York City, forcing many websites to shut down their operations for days.
The cloud simply routes traffic around problem areas as if, yes, they have just been destroyed by a nuclear attack.
It's best to move data to the cloud, to avoid such disruptions because there your data will be stored in multiple locations.
This redundancy makes it so that even if one area is affected, your operations don't have to capitulate, and data remains accessible no matter what happens. It's a system called deduplication.
Lower Overhead
The cloud can save businesses a lot of money.
By outsourcing data storage to cloud providers, businesses save on capital and maintenance costs, money that in turn can be used to expand the business. Setting up an in-house data center requires tens of thousands of dollars in investment, and that's not to mention the maintenance costs it carries.
Plus, considering the security, reduced lag, up-time and controlled environments that providers such as Amazon's AWS have, creating an in-house data center seems about as contemporary as a buggy whip, a corset, or a Model T.
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Cloud-computing.png499506MHFTFhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMHFTF2018-12-24 01:06:352018-12-21 18:44:33The Cloud for Dummies
If there was ever a canary in the coal mine, we got one with chipmaker Micron (MU) delivering weak earnings results missing on the top line but squeaking through a one-cent beat on the bottom line.
Love them or hate them, chip companies are susceptible to the boom-bust cycle that is a hallmark of the chip industry.
The beginning of the bust stage of the cycle is upon us with management detailing an “inventory adjustment” that put a damper on revenue.
Micron followed that up by reducing capex for next year and it will take 2-3 quarters to work off this bloated inventory channel.
The perpetrator to the inventory backlog is the smartphone industry.
President and CEO of Micron Sanjay Mehrotra particularly noted “high-end smartphones” as the malefactor tugging down the demand.
This is another damming testament to the prospects of Apple’s (AAPL) suppliers Quorvo (QRVO), Skyworks Solutions (SWKS), NXP Semiconductors (NXPI), Cirrus Logic (CRUS), and Lumentum Holdings (LITE) who can’t catch a break.
The last six months have fired a barrage of poison-tipped arrows at their core business and these stocks are squarely in the no-fly zone until Apple and the trade war can conjure up some good news.
To say these shares are oversold is an understatement, but we are in an extreme trading environment with volatility shooting up the wazoo.
Further reducing the glimmer, Chinese tariffs took up a worrying amount of the conference call dialogue. Investors found out that tariffs pinged half a percent of gross margins.
I have been outright bearish the chip industry from the middle part of the year and Micron is heavily reliant on China for about half of its revenues which is a death sentence in December 2018.
As the China risks have spiked after each head fake détente, so have the execution risks to chip companies with an overly reliant manufacturing process in China.
Not only has the execution risk ratcheted up, but the regulatory risk through costly tariffs is now eroding Micron’s margins.
If you thought that was a downer, then FedEx (FDX) made sure the nail was in the coffin by its ghastly earnings report.
The stock sold off hard confirming fears that global growth is decelerating.
Management did not mince their words about the state of the world and investors usually listen because FedEx is a reliable yardstick of the bigger global economy.
CEO of FedEx Fred Smith offered an olive branch painting a picture of a “solid” US economy, but the conundrum is that the US economy and any other country don't exist in a vacuum and that has been highly evident in Britain who is engaging in economic suicide by disengaging from the globalized world.
Smith cited Europe as a stumbling block and blamed the bulk of weak guidance on “bad political choices”, a thinly veiled dig at the poor level of governance carried out around the world lately.
I might chime in that it is quite strange when political parties and sovereign nations adopt the game of chicken as the leading political strategy applying it to everything and anything.
The side effects to business have been startling with management unable to assuage investor sentiment and business plans shredded apart because of impulsive policy moves.
Politicians aren’t grasping fully that stock market moves are inherently tied to the news cycle and the overwhelming volume of bad news that shouldn’t be as bad as it should be, has a multiplier effect on the stock market algos that go haywire.
It truly is the world of the algos and humans are living in their world and not the other way around.
The most important takeaway from FedEx is what they didn’t say.
Early development of the de-facto Amazon Airlines has already cost FedEx up to 3% of total volume growth.
And this is just the beginning.
Amazon is still feeling around for the rocks at the bottom while it tries to cross the river.
Once it masters logistics, expect a radical swivel towards the integration of their own airline into the bulk of Amazon.com’s package deliveries.
And when FedEx’s management claims that the market has gotten it wrong about the Amazon threat, that means the market is completely correct.
The market is always right.
Amazon’s master plan is to vertically integrate every last process down to the last mile, the doorbell, and now the microwave as Amazon has rolled out a myriad of smart home products.
FedEx management has to be blind to understand this won’t damage future sales.
It is materially false if FedEx thinks Amazon is not competing with them, and the sad part of this is there is not much FedEx can do about it.
The shipping giant cut its 2019 earnings forecast between $15.50 and $16.60 per share — from $17.20 to $17.80 a share.
FedEx’s goal of eclipsing $1.5 billion in operating income by fiscal 2020 has been shelved disappointing investors. FedEx cratered 12% on a day that saw the Fed do its best body slam imitation on the market.
The first phase of the logistics swivel is taking delivery of 40 planes and constructing a hub that will be able to operate 100 planes, then it will do as Amazon does with everything – scale it to the hills.
FedEx and UPS have a few years to figure out how to counteract this existential crisis and not decades.
Technology moves that fast now in this interconnected world.
Domestic volume comprises 17% of revenues at UPS and 19% at FedEx, management won’t be able to hide this problem under the carpet as the drag becomes highly visible like a sore thumb.
Analysts expect Amazon Air to offer more than slim savings to its business model saving between $2 to $4 per package next year.
The annual savings add up from $1 billion to $2 billion or 3% to 6% of its global shipping costs.
It is spot-on to admit that over the last few years, the explosion of packages during the holiday shopping season has put higher levels of stress on the U.S. Postal Service, UPS (UPS), and FedEx.
Even though overloaded with business, all three carriers have posted record levels of on-time deliveries and they appear to be handling the surge in volume.
But there will come a moment in time when an inflection point will give Amazon the keys to the car.
They will suddenly stop offering their e-commerce packages to these three carriers and business will drop off a cliff for them.
That is the future these three are confronted with and there is nothing they can do unless they build their own Amazon.com which is a pie in the sky dream at this point.
Amazon is out to prove they can execute the logistic part of their business cheaper and faster than anyone else because of the superior management and mountain of data they can act on.
I believe it will happen.
Part of stretching themselves with a new army of minions in Washington D.C., New York, and Nashville is partly about fulfilling the job of comprehensively and vertically integrating their e-commerce platform.
It will take a horde of workers to make this happen.
If the prophecy from FedEx management comes true and the global economy indeed softens next year, the stock will bear the brunt of the downside momentum and UPS too.
Stay away from the trio of deliverers. There are healthier fishes in the sea.
And as for the chip sector and Apple, wait on the sidelines for some good news.
IT’S NOT IF, BUT WHEN
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/FedEx-trucks-dec20.png550712Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2018-12-20 01:06:072018-12-19 19:43:57Micron Technology Bombs Again
On Sunday, I spent 30 minutes driving around looking for a parking space at Target. Once there, I waited for another half hour while the people in front of me paid for their entire Christmas shopping for the year. You can’t get a restaurant reservation anywhere.
With economic conditions this strong, you would think the stock market would be booming, soaring to new highs daily.
It’s not. In fact, as I write this, the Dow Average is now down 5% in 2018 and off a gut-punching 13% since the beginning of October. Two-month support was shattered yesterday.
In fact, stocks have just suffered their worst quarter in a decade. Technology shares, in particular, have taken the biggest hit since the 2000 Dotcom Bust. We have in effect seen Dotcom Bust 2.0.
I warned readers for years that the top of this bull market may not be defined by any particular economic or geopolitical event. The sheer weight of prices could do it. Some 2 ½ months into a horrific meltdown and it looks like that is what happened. I’ve lost count of the 600 points downdrafts in recent weeks.
All of which I find extremely annoying as I missed one of the greatest short selling opportunities of all time. I feel like such an idiot. I did get off a few shorts. My Tesla short (TSLA) is going gangbusters but I still love the company long term. The bond market (TLT) remains my new rich uncle, writing me generous checks monthly.
The reason I didn’t go short more aggressively is that the risk of a China trade deal was always looming on the horizon. When it happens, markets could rocket 10%. But nine months into the trade war, and it still remains way out there on the horizon. Wasn’t it General Douglas MacArthur who said the US should never get involved in a land war in Asia?
Of course, the reasons are all crystal clear with 20/20 hindsight. The Federal Reserve giveth, and Federal Reserve taketh away. While global liquidity was exploding, stocks could only go one way, and that was up. Fortunately, I was one of the early ones to figure this out. But then, I took former Governor Janet Yellen’s class at UC Berkley.
Now, everywhere you look liquidity is disappearing. The US government will run a $1 trillion budget deficit in 2019. Add in entitlements and that balloons to $1.3 trillion.
The Fed is sucking out another $600 billion next year as part of its quantitative tightening, the long-advertised QE unwind. Did I mention that the Fed has raised interest rates six times in three years and will raise again once more on Wednesday?
As I peruse my charts and run the numbers on possible options combinations, the number of “screaming buys” almost can’t be counted. Apple (AAPL), for example is looking at a potential $10 of downside versus $170 of upside on a five-year view.
But you know, sitting on your hands seems to be working for everyone else. I think I’ll give it a try. It is far easier to buy them on the way up than catch a falling knife. Sure, I’m unchanged on the quarter, but unchanged is not what I’m all about. I think I’ll just lock in my 30% return this year and call it a year. I’ll be a hero again in 2019.
I Think I’ll Just Sit Tight For Now
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/John-Thomas.png418627Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2018-12-18 01:07:402018-12-17 20:14:14The Christmas Rally Got Stopped at the Border
Mad Hedge Technology Letter December 18, 2018 Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE BIG TECHNOLOGY TRENDS OF 2019) (MSFT), (AMZN), (BBY), (SONO), (ROKU), (ADBE), (AAPL), (BAC)
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2018-12-18 01:07:212018-12-17 18:48:05December 18, 2018
Legal Disclaimer
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.