There have been a lot of whispers as to who the tech leadership group could be in 2024.
The notion that for the tech rally to continue, more participation is needed is unequivocally false.
A strong but narrow group of tech stocks coined the magnificent seven don’t need smaller stocks to help buoy the broader tech indices.
The law of large numbers also dictates price action meaning even if smaller stocks have the time of their life next year, they still won’t make a dent compared to the absurdly expensive tech stocks that are aiming at $4 trillion in market cap.
Therefore, I believe there is a high likelihood that these potent 7 stocks outperform the rest of tech yet again and I will explain why.
Faster growth rates and reasonable valuations bode well for mega-cap tech stocks.
The seven stocks I am talking about refer to Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, Tesla, and Nvidia, are responsible for 76% of the S&P 500's 2023 gain of nearly 20%.
Nvidia is up more than 200% year-to-date, and even Apple, the world's largest company, saw its stock price surge nearly 50% this year. The seven companies represent a collective $11.5 trillion in market value
The fundamentals are superior.
The seven mega-cap tech stocks have more attractive fundamentals when compared to the S&P 500's bottom 493 stocks.
They boast faster growth, higher profit margins, stronger balance sheets, and reasonable valuations on a relative basis.
And while price-to-earnings valuations are elevated for the tech stocks, when accounting for growth, they're actually in line with the rest of the market.
Mega-cap tech stocks cratered in 2022.
The sharp outperformance in the mega-cap tech stocks this year comes after a brutal 2022 in which a number of the stocks were severely punished because of the Fed hiking like they have never hiked before.
From their peak, Meta fell more than 70%, Nvidia dropped more than 60%, and Amazon's share price was cut in half in 2022.
The dominance of mega-cap tech in 2023 largely reflected a reversal of meaningful underperformance in 2022 so much so that the group of tech stocks fell a collective 39% that painful year.
The pullback was a healthy consolidation and psychologically, it feels like this bullish year means we are back to neutral.
There is a high chance that tech stocks rally on the belief that a recession will cause the Fed to drop interest rates.
Indicators are starting to look a little sluggish suggesting that earnings could come somewhat soft in the first quarter.
No doubt that the US consumer is stretched to its limit and thinking twice before spending.
The knock-on effect will be delayed iPhone purchases, delayed Tesla purchases and the other 5 of the Magnificent 7 could feel the slowdown as well.
Tech’s path to the recession could cause another rally into the recession when investors are likely to take profits when we finally arrive at the recession that every investor has been waiting for years.
In the meantime, there is a high likelihood that these 7 stocks will continue success in the short-term.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00april@madhedgefundtrader.comhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngapril@madhedgefundtrader.com2023-12-06 14:02:522023-12-06 16:32:14Positive Signs For 2024
Below please find subscribers’ Q&A for the October 18 Mad Hedge Fund Trader Global Strategy Webinar, broadcast from London England.
Q: Is Nvidia (NVDA) a buy at the current price?
A: Absolutely, if your view is more than, say, a month. This stock will easily be $1,000 in the next year or two. They have such a huge moat on their business, and the high-end chips that are banned in China are only a tiny fraction of their overall business—they’re still allowed to sell small and medium-sized chips.
Q: Where do you see bond yields peaking out?
A: My pet target is 5.2% on a spike. We may get there in a few weeks or months. The position we have breaks even at 5.15% in 21 trading days. So any kind of rally on that position becomes profitable—even a one-day rally.
Q: Are you hitting Israel next?
A: No, I covered the Middle Eastern wars for 10 years starting with the ‘73 Yom Kippur wars, and I got sick of it. They’re using the same arguments to justify their positions that they were 50 years ago. In fact, the disputes have been going on for hundreds of years. So, I moved on to other more interesting wars like Ukraine. There are plenty of newbies cutting their teeth as war correspondents in Gaza now—I'll leave it to them.
Q: Are the results for all of the newsletters or just for one?
A: Those alerts that I send out personally are the results for the Mad Hedge Global Trading Dispatch. All of the other services (we have six now) have their own trade histories which we don’t publish, as it’s too much of an account job effort to update six independent track records. People know whether they’re making money or not—that's good enough for me. That’s how we’re set up; we’re a staff-light operation so that we can keep the prices low.
Q: What do you expect for Tesla (TSLA) earnings today?
A: I never make same-day earnings calls, but I would expect they’d be good. They would be less than they were in the past because the price wars are cutting into margins, but they’re gaining market shares at everybody else’s expense, which makes (TSLA) a “BUY”. In fact, if you look at the charts, it seems to be moving sideways into an upside breakout.
Q: Is it too late to buy military?
A: No, I’d be buying any of the big military stocks like Lockheed Martin (LMT), because the increase in demand for weapons is not a short-term thing—it is a more or less permanent thing which will go out decades. Also, they all already have massive government contracts to rebuild our own weapons. Most people don't realize that almost every weapons system in the United States is more than 50 years old. The reason is we quit investing in conventional weapons because we all thought the next war would be cyber. Well, Russia got absolutely nowhere on cyber—they made a few weak attempts to shut down Ukraine and couldn't even break into Elon Musk’s Skylink system, which all of Ukraine is running on.
Q: Why is Morgan Stanley (MS) doing so poorly?
A: All the financials are getting hit because of the collapsing bond market. Once the bond market finds a bottom you want to be buying financials with both hands.
Q: When the market recovers, which sector will lead?
A: Technology. The Magnificent Seven will lead. There’s safety in size. Google/Alphabet (GOOG), Nvidia (NVDA), Tesla (TSLA), Microsoft (MSFT), Amazon (AMZN), Apple (APPL), Facebook/Meta (META). They’re already leading now, so if you have those positions, I’d keep them. If you don’t, you should start picking them up.
Q: Is Rivian (RIVN) a buy at this level?
A: Absolutely. Amazon, which owns 25% of the company, just hit 10,000 Rivian delivery vans. I’ve seen them in California, they’re completely silent—very interesting cars. It’s just a question of how quickly they can produce them.
Q: Why is there a market drop today?
A: It’s the bond market. The first thing you look at every day is the bond market—if it's doing crappy, everything sells off.
Q: Do you still suggest 90-day T-bills at this point?
A: We may end up getting a stock buying opportunity into the year-end. Even if we have to wait for a yearend rally, you get paid every day for 90-day T-bills, and you can sell them at any time and get interest up to the day you sell them because they’re discount bonds that appreciate every day to reflect the yield. It’s a great way to park money, and most brokers will let you buy stocks against your 90-day T-bill position. So say you want to go fully invested in stocks—you could do that while selling your 90-day T-bills the same day. Most brokers will let you do that, worst case charging you one day of margin.
Q: Do you think China is using the Hamas attack on Israel to distract the US?
A: No, China wouldn’t want to get involved in this. Iran has its fingerprints all over it. Iran supplied all the missiles used to attack Israel, and if the Israelis turn around and attack Iran by destroying all of their nuclear and missile-making facilities, I would not be surprised one bit. That may be what Biden is really doing over there—trying to convince the Israelis not to escalate the war.
Q: What are the chances of a US default on November 17 (TLT)?
A: So far on all of these government shutdowns, the US Treasury has been able to come up with magic tricks to keep from defaulting; but if the default is long enough, even they will have to stop paying interest to bondholders, which will increase the debt burden of the US government because a lower credit rating will cause it to pay higher interest rates. Why people think this is a great strategy is beyond me.
Q: Gasoline is down and oil is up—what’s going on?
A: That’s usually driven by the crack spread—the availability of gasoline from refineries in the US, so I wouldn’t use that as any kind of indicator.
Q: Do you think China (FXI) is shifting priorities away from economic growth to military strength?
A: No I don’t, they would love to have economic growth if they could, and in fact, their central bank has been stimulating their economy, and it's working; that’s how this morning’s report got back up to 5%. At the end of the day, they just want peace. All this military stuff—they’re just bluffing and posturing, which is really all they’ve ever done, at least since the Korean War. They weren’t even big participants in the Vietnam War, so China doesn’t worry me at all; there are bigger things to worry about. But they definitely have hit a wall in economic growth, and a big part of that is Covid, and a big part of that is a shrinking population—a shortage of workers, and a shortage of workers who can support older parents.
Q: Will there be an oil embargo against Israel? The US and Europe by OPEC countries?
A: No. The Middle Eastern governments know what's really going on here, even though what they may say in public is completely different. The fact is that Hamas started this war, and none of these other countries want Hamas in their countries because they know that the first thing they'll do is overthrow the local government. Effectively, Hamas doesn’t exist anymore either—they've really all been killed, so you just have to give some time for things to cool down out there, and of course, the US is working overtime to keep the situation from escalating, but we can only try—we can’t enforce this thing. One question I've been getting from a lot of people lately is: will the US send troops to Israel or to Gaza? The answer is no—we were in Iraq and Afghanistan for 20 years! We’re in no hurry to get back into a new war, especially a new 20-year war, and that would not be in our own interest. By the way, Israel can amply defend itself; they have the best military in the Middle East by far, largely supported by the United States. For me, the big mystery is how intelligence in Israel missed this attack. They were just completely asleep at the switch, and some day in the future there will be an investigation about this, but don’t expect it from the current government.
Q: Why won’t Egypt and Jordan take the Palestinian refugees?
A: They are both poor countries. Neither of them is oil-rich, and Egypt especially has a horrendous population problem—they are in fact the world's second largest food importer after China. They have 110 million people to feed and not enough production locally to do that, so it isn’t easy to take in 2 million Palestinians. If you don't believe me, go to Cairo—it's just incredibly crowded. With a population of 10 million you can't go anywhere, so where are they going to put 2 million more people? So this is a difficult problem, there's no easy fix depending on what side you’re on.
To watch a replay of this webinar with all the charts, bells, whistles, and classic rock music, just log in to www.madhedgefundtrader.com, go to MY ACCOUNT, select your subscription (GLOBAL TRADING DISPATCH, TECHNOLOGY LETTER, or Jacquie's Post), then click on WEBINARS, and all the webinars from the last 12 years are there in all their glory.
Good Luck and Good Trading.
John Thomas
CEO & Publisher
The Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader
If there is a company I would tell my grandkids to work for then it would be semiconductor company Qualcomm (QCOM).
Why?
Even Apple (APPL) can’t replace them so easily and that counts for a lot in this day and age.
We learned just as much as Qualcomm said that it will supply Apple with 5G modems for smartphones through 2026.
Qualcomm expected to lose the Apple smartphone business, because they expected Apple to use an internally developed 5G modem starting in 2024.
They couldn’t develop the product fast enough so it is back snapping up modems with QCOM.
QCOM is the best of breed for smartphone chips and they can be found in every flagship Android device.
I am specifically referring to QCOM’s Snapdragon products which are a suite of system on a chip (SoC) semiconductor products for mobile devices.
The Snapdragon's central processing unit (CPU) uses the ARM architecture.
This line of chips is incredibly competitive and one of the foundational reasons to hold the stock.
Samsung’s SoC competitor named the Exynos is still a far cry from the Snapdragon no matter how hard they try and it seems like each iteration of the Exynos flagship SoC is always a generation behind the Snapdragon.
Apple do use their own SoC with the newest one named the Apple A17 Bionic, but QCOM will still monopolize the Android market with their own Snapdragon that is actually slightly better than the A17 Bionic chip.
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 beats the CPU clock speed of the A17 Bionic.
This doesn’t always translate to better real-world performance, but it’s still an impressive feat.
People believe the new Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSM) 3 nanometer (nm) processing can lose to the advanced 4nm node on the 8 Gen 3.
However, Apple will probably maintain a CPU lead, thanks to better software tuning and more transistors in the same area thanks to a smaller 3-nanometer node.
Basically, Snapdragon is a little faster but Apple has higher performance because of its superior software.
There is no denying that Apple has fantastic software.
On the revenue side, this is great news for the staying power of Snapdragon products and continued sales to Apple will boost Qualcomm’s handsets business, which reported $5.26 billion in sales in the past quarter and could soften the blow of potentially losing a critical customer.
About 21% of Qualcomm’s fiscal 2022 revenue of $44.2 billion came from Apple.
APPL purchased Intel’s smartphone modem division in 2019 to build its own modem. However, evidence suggests that it will be challenging for Apple to move away from Qualcomm’s chips because of their complexity.
Qualcomm also makes money from Apple through cellular licensing fees, which were about $1.9 billion in 2022.
Qualcomm continues to collect royalties from Apple under a six-year agreement. That agreement was struck at the end of a legal battle between Apple and Qualcomm over royalties that was settled in 2019.
Qualcomm says that it expects to only supply 20% of the modems needed for Apple’s 2026 smartphone launch, signaling that it likely still expects the Apple business to eventually decline.
Apple’s new iPhone called iPhone 15 uses QCOM modems as do many other high-end smartphones.
It’s hard to believe that QCOM’s market capitalization is only $125 billion. The eye test alone makes me think this is a half a trillion-dollar company.
Revenue is accelerating and they offer a 2.9% dividend yield.
I can’t talk more about the high quality of products made by QCOM.
This company will have staying power and even if Apple decides to move on, there are a slew of companies ready to gobble up QCOM chips.
Readers shouldn’t trade this stock, but they should buy and hold for the long haul.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2023-09-13 15:02:482023-09-13 15:06:57A Great Chip Stock to Buy and Hold
When it rains – it pours. Let’s talk about China (MCHI) and Apple (AAPL) CEO Tim Cook.
I admit that I was quite harsh on Tim Cook 7 years ago when writing this Mad Hedge Technology letter.
I routinely delivered scathing critiques of him and perpetuated the narrative that he was only an operations guy.
Then I lightened up as he drove the company to higher highs even though the company didn’t foray too far from its bread and butter the iPhone.
My fierce criticism revolved around Cook betting the ranch on an Eastern adversary at a time when deglobalization started to pick up pace.
After knocking out the $2 trillion market cap and vaulting past $3 trillion, I gave Cook a pass for the time being.
Fast forward 7 years and the sushi has hit the fan and Cook has an absolute fiasco on his hands.
The trouble brewing in China is not necessarily entirely his fault, but sleep with the enemy, and it is hard to whine about the consequences.
In one fell swoop, 60 million hardcore Apple customers are dropping Apple products.
It’s a swift kick in the nuts for Cook.
Funnily enough, just a few months ago, Tim Cook was one of the few U.S. CEOs to venture to China after its reopening with his usual kowtowing to the communist party.
In March, he declared that Apple and China had a “symbiotic kind of relationship.”
It is bizarre to hear such an important figure in the American technology apparatus so infatuated with the Chinese.
Beijing is ordering officials in all departments to stop using iPhones.
Then Beijing extended the ban to state-owned enterprises.
How important is China to Apple?
China is key to Apple’s supply chain and to its sales.
About half of Apple’s smartphones are made in a giant factory complex in Zhengzhou, nicknamed “iPhone City”, operated by electronics manufacturer Foxconn.
China is also a significant consumer market for Apple, as it is the largest market outside the U.S. The company generated $15.8 billion in sales from China alone last quarter, 20% of its total.
Chinese consumers gravitate to the iPhone too: Apple has 65% market share for premium phones over $600.
There is a big element here in getting Chinese people to use their own smartphones.
I know many people who use Chinese smartphones because they are flagship quality but 40% cheaper than iPhones.
The only piece lacking is usually the Apple quality high-end camera, but most people don’t use their phone for a high-definition YouTube channel.
My sense is that the 60 million white-collar Chinese people will grumble about the brand downgrade to Huawei or Xiaomi, but the drop-off in performance isn’t so crazy that they are willing to go rogue and find a roundabout way to use an iPhone.
This sets the stage for all Apple products to get banned full-stop in China which is 20% of Apple’s revenue.
That includes Apple watches, earbuds, computers, and the whole shebang even the services part of the equation.
Deglobalization is rearing its ugly head again and this event could be a catalyst to take Apple shares back down to more affordable levels.
I would look at buying the dip once this negative news works itself through the system.
However, this event is akin to the tech sector getting stunned with a left hook to its face, and it will take time to recover don’t expect any American corporations to do business in China anytime soon under these souring conditions.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00april@madhedgefundtrader.comhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngapril@madhedgefundtrader.com2023-09-08 15:02:392023-09-08 16:39:50The Sushi Hits the Fan in Cupertino
Many industries have experienced consolidation in the last few years and music streaming has been no exception.
The strong emergence of a few companies running the show has resulted in these same companies wielding extraordinary pricing power.
Spotify (SPOT) has been one of the leading music streaming platforms for years, and when companies harness pricing power, they can raise prices to compensate for higher expenses.
That is exactly what Spotify did recently as their stock sold off on a wider-than-expected loss for the second quarter, even though subscribers surged.
The streaming service posted a net loss of 302 million euros.
Monthly active users (MUAs) beat estimates of 530 million to hit 551 million — a 27% improvement compared to the year-ago period. Net additions of 36 million represented Spotify's largest quarterly net addition performance in its history.
Premium subscribers also surpassed expectations of 217 million, jumping another 17% year over year to hit 220 million.
In its first-quarter report, the company said it expected to add 15 million new monthly active users in Q2, bringing its total to 530 million. It also expected revenue of 3.2 billion euros and to report 217 million paid subscribers in the quarter.
Spotify is continuing to invest in advertising, and its ad-supported revenue grew 12% year over year. The company said podcast advertising revenue growth reaccelerated to more than 30% year over year.
Spotify will increase the price of its Premium subscription offerings by as much as $2, which translates to a 20% rise for some plans.
In the U.S., Spotify’s Premium Individual offering now costs $10.99, up from $9.99, and the price of its Premium Duo plan changed to $14.99, up from $12.99. The company’s Premium Family plan is now priced at $16.99, up from $15.99, and the Student offering costs $5.99, up from $4.99.
Spotify doesn’t expect a drawdown in product demand from the price increase, and let’s face it, most people can handle paying an extra 2 bucks for something they use every day.
Music streaming is definitely close to becoming an industry participated in by just a few for as long as it’s a viable business.
That means Spotify will also have the opportunity to raise subscription prices again in the future.
The licensing issues alone are too much of a hurdle for most companies to get to launch so to really compete takes a high amount of upfront funds and in the world of high interest rates, tech firms can’t fund this type of retread business again.
Spotify isn’t a pure monopoly.
The others involved are Apple Music, Amazon, Tidal, Deezer, and Pandora.
SPOT’s stock has increased by over 85% after the earnings pullback, and at one point they were up over 100%.
Growing subscriptions at 27% is still considered something that a growth company does at a time when growth companies are hard to find.
It doesn’t matter that they aren’t profitable yet, as long as they add more subscribers, which they have strongly indicated they will.
The stock has pulled back from $175 and once the negative shakeout fades away, traders should get into SPOT while they still can.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2023-08-02 14:02:142023-08-18 00:36:53Spot On With Spotify
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
July 26, 2023 Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(GOOD SIGNS FOR TECH) (GOOGL), (APPL), (CHATGPT)
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2023-07-26 17:04:522023-07-26 17:53:22July 26, 2023
Legal Disclaimer
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.
