• support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Member Login
Mad Hedge Fund Trader
  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Luncheons
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Tag Archive for: (FB)

MHFTF

Why Snapchat Snapped

Tech Letter

To the dismay of tech shares, the tech industry doesn’t operate in a bubble.

The broader landscape is experiencing a dose of volatility triggered by the ratcheting up in interest rates.

There’s not much tech can do to change the narrative.

The back and forth political saber rattling isn’t helping either.

Tech is experiencing a swift rotation out of hyper-growth names such as Amazon (AMZN) and Netflix (NFLX) with investors taking profits on these names that have gone up in a straight line this year.

This does not mean you should fling these stocks into tech heaven yet.

The hardest hit names will be the marginal tech firms in the marginal tech spaces headed by dreadful management.

This narrow criterion conveniently perfectly fits one company I have written about extensively.

Enter Snapchat.

It’s been a year to forget or remember - depending on how you look at it for CEO of Snapchat Evan Spiegel.

Snapchat was one of my first recommendations of The Mad Hedge Technology Letter when I told readers to run for the hills.

To read my story on Snapchat, please click here.

At that time, the stock was trading at a luxurious $19.

Lionizing this shoddy company would be a stretch as shares have parachuted down to the $6.60 level.

The latest word is that Snapchat is burning money fast.

The cash crunch will quickly force them to raise some capital and this is just one of the many litanies of spectacular misfortunes that have beset this Venice, California social media starlet.

Maybe management is spending too much time ripping the bong on Venice Beach because the decisions being made are of that ilk.

The first catastrophic move out of many was the botched redesign alienating the core base who were dazed and confused by the new interface and functionality.

Social media works poorly when you can’t find your friends on it.

Spiegel admitted the redesign was “rushed” and it behooves me to let readers know that the redesign was the worst redesign I have ever seen in my life as I tested it out in my office.

Snapchat quickly restored the previous interface calming their shrinking core audience.

The self-inflicted wound was deep, and earnings reflected the quicksand Snapchat quickly found itself in.

Snapchat announced that global daily active users (DAUs) shrank from 191 million to 188 million.

A company at this early stage in the growth cycle should be reeling in the users non-stop.

This is far from a mature company and if executed properly the company should have the ability to cast their net far and wide scooping up new users left and right.

Let’s remember that Instagram, the Facebook (FB) owned direct competitor, is growing their user base parabolically.

Simply put, Snapchat has had no answer to Instagram’s rapid rise to fame, and that was the center of my thesis to turn my back to this rapidly deteriorating company.

Snapchat has offered no meaningful innovation to combat the terrorizing force of Instagram.

The dearth of innovation has caused the average time spent on the platform to dip from 33 minutes to 31 minutes per session.

Instagram has stretched the lead on Snapchat. In fact, it was Instagram that cleverly borrowed Snapchat’s best features and integrated them into their platform.

Sentiment has turned rotten as the stock sold off when Spiegel announced that he wants the company to turn profitable in 2019.

Investors don’t believe this one iota.

Snapchat is expected to burn through $1.5 billion in 2019, and Spiegel’s pipedream of scratching out a profit is implausible.

Snapchat is not executing on the digital ad front.

It was a year and a half ago when consensus believed Snapchat was able to churn out revenue of $540 million this quarter, but it looks more likely that Snapchat is set for revenue of just a shade over $280 million.

The severe underperformance is due to a lack of advertisers causing the eventual price of digital ads to fetch a lower price in an auction-based model.  

Stinging as it might be, the lower costs of ads is also caused by the average age group of Snapchat’s core base.

Snapchatters are usually teenagers and have low purchasing power.

Targeting an older user base would improve margins significantly.

However, the conundrum is that the core user base might jump ship like they did to Facebook and shifted over to Facebook-owned Instagram.

Snap doesn’t have a Facebook posing an acute problem that could likely backfire.

General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union made the issue of securing personal data a national issue.

Facebook poured fuel on the fire when they disclosed several breaches clobbering their share price.

Mark Zuckerberg’s company is still reeling from the series of mishaps.

Ironically, Facebook debuted a smart speaker with prime access to user’s home when trust is at its lowest ebb around Facebook’s data collection practices.

Investors really need to ask themselves if Facebook’s management has any common sense at all.

Any decent company would have halted this project and I expect it to be a complete disaster.

Part of Snapchat’s turnaround strategy involves releasing scripted shows as short as five minutes long.

Entering into the original content wars is a tough sell. The competition is becoming fiercer and this move hardly will differentiate itself from ad buyers who already avoid Snapchat. In fact, it smells of desperation.

Snapchat has seen a brutal brain drain with management leaving in droves.

They have voted with their feet.

Chief Strategy Officer Imran Khan was the latest to announce his upcoming departure.

Others to jettison are the VP of product, VP of sales, VP of engineering, and its general counsel.

The high turnover rate will make it more complicated to execute a drastic reversal of fortune.

The only silver lining is if Zuckerberg manages to screw up Instagram after forcing the creators out with his behind-the-scenes meddling, giving a glimmer of hope to Snapchat.

A stellar performance from the execution team along with a Facebook mess of Instagram could resuscitate the user base if users start to flee Instagram in droves.

There aren’t many alternatives unless a user is inclined to quit social media.

Snapchat badly needs to build up its user base or else digital ad buyers will stay away.

I am still bearish on this stock and it would take a small miracle to spruce up the share price again.

 

 

 

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTF https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTF2018-10-11 09:01:562018-10-11 08:23:45Why Snapchat Snapped
MHFTR

October 1, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
October 1, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(ZINC AIR BATTERIES WILL REVOLUTIONIZE ELECTRIC CARS),
(TSLA), (NIO), (FB), (GOOGL), (NFLX)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-10-01 01:07:002018-09-28 19:56:13October 1, 2018
MHFTR

Zinc Air Batteries Will Revolutionize Electric Cars

Tech Letter

As Panasonic ramps up its battery production at the Tesla Gigafactory 1 in Sparks, Nevada, the demand and business for renewable energy has never been more robust.

And as the world’s population balloons and man-made pollutants roil the natural ecosphere, business needs an answer to these potential apocalyptic bombshells or there will be nowhere clean enough to live.

Energy security and population growth will have a complicated relationship going forward and cannot be ignored for the sake of mankind.

This isn’t me being a tree-hugging, Birkenstock-trotting, save-the-earth, love and peace-type of guy.

This problem is real and whoever discovers the solution could reap untold profits.

The answer has been found - rechargeable zinc air batteries.

Spearheading this massive initiative is South African-born entrepreneur, sports team owner, Los Angeles Times owner, and more importantly the founder, chairman and CEO of NantEnergy Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong.

This El Segundo, California-based company presented an utter game changer to the future of the world and the world’s economy.

NantEnergy debuted a rechargeable battery powered by oxidizing zinc with oxygen from the air for commercial use at the One Planet Summit in New York.

It also has the capability to store energy.

Not only is this technology and product cutting edge, but it has the cost basis to support broad-based scalability and adoption.

Ramkumar Krishnan, chief technology officer of NantEnergy claimed this revolutionary battery can “deliver energy for $100 per kilowatt-hour (kWh).”

Lithium-ion batteries have been the mainstay choice for clean energy or clean enough energy since 1992, and its usage varies in cost from $300 to $500 kWh.

Tesla, with its phalanx of superior engineers, has been able to suppress that cost all the way down to a level between $100 to $200 kWh level.

NantEnergy has already registered more than100 related patents in its name and envisions a $50 billion addressable market.

I believe the addressable market is substantially bigger.

For all the hoopla about lithium-ion batteries, there are severe drawbacks in its usage and application.

Let’s concisely run down the pitfalls of batteries of this ilk.

Once out the factory door, the performance starts to go downhill.

Lithium-ion batteries react poorly to high temperatures.

These batteries become inoperable if completely discharged.

There is a slight chance a battery could burst into flames and burn off your face.

Simply put, lithium-ion batteries incorporate cobalt, an extremely toxic material hazardous to human health.

If a Samsung Galaxy smartphone explodes, cover your mouth to avoid inhaling the cobalt-laced fumes.

Dr. Soon-Shiong characterized this new technology as the “holy grail” of renewable energy.

Wide-scale adoption would bring the need for cobalt to its knees.

No longer would tech companies need to scramble to secure a sufficient amount of cobalt supply from the deepest reaches of the Congo jungle.

It would be the end of cobalt as we know it.

At first, lithium would be required for a stopgap measure while engineers refine the battery on its way to a full-fledged zinc alone battery.

The lithium placeholder would only be temporary.

The clean energy movement must be grinning widely as the potential to finally do away with cobalt from renewable energy has pronounced social and economic consequences.

An estimated 1.4 billion people still live in the dark and do not have access to electricity.

This technology is being tested in villages in Africa and desolate communities in Asia as we speak.

The absence of electricity isolates these undeveloped communities in third-world Africa and Asia without access to health care, education, and technology.

It’s hard to kick-start your life as a sprouting little kid when you’re lost in the dark half the time.

Importing fossil fuel to put these communities online is unfeasible and just plain too expensive for communities that have a dire shortage of capital.

Currently, NantEnergy’s rechargeable zinc air batteries are online in 110 villages located in nine Asian and African countries.

The batteries have been combined to establish a microgrid system powering entire areas.

The company will start delivery this product next year widening its type of use to telecommunications towers.

The next step after that would be the home energy storage market targeting California and New York as the first American cities.

Engineers have pointed out that this development could transform the electric grid into a “round-the-clock carbon-free system.”

In addition, with cooperation with Duke Energy, a major utility, NantEnergy’s batteries have been powering communications towers in America for the past six years.

The design is mind-boggling utilitarian - plastic, a circuit board, and zinc oxide wrapped up in a briefcase-size shell.

One charge can offer 72 hours of battery life.

The charging process is easy - electricity from solar installations is stored by converting zinc oxide to zinc and oxygen.

The discharge process is straightforward, too - the system produces energy by oxidizing the zinc with air.

The pursuit of energy reduction is in full throttle, and this is the next leg up for energy aficionados.

Your lithium-ion-run Tesla could become a legacy company in a matter of years if this technology disrupts Elon Musk’s brainchild.

Lately, Musk has been falling behind the eight ball with fresh innovators hot on his heels.

This is the latest company to enter into its market even though still in the incubation stage.

Competitors have popped out of nowhere and are coming for his bacon.

Shanghai headquartered electric car manufacturer Nio (NIO) went public and raised more than $2 billion.

Even though it is not yet a threat to Tesla, it shows that Tesla isn’t the only game in town anymore.

In any case, NantEnergy has the magic to unlock the “holy grail” of renewable energy. And if it can promise on its cost projections, I see no reason why this won’t be furiously adopted by corporations worldwide.

As it is, America has been losing out in the Congo, as China has cornered the cobalt market there.

And, as the evolution of fracking technology quelled the Middle-East situation, it could also have the same effect in the Congo.

More excitingly, it could put online an additional 1.2 billion new customers to devour iPhones and watch Netflix (NFLX).

Companies such as Facebook (FB) and Alphabet (GOOGL) have been developing a way for these remote and poverty-prone places to use Internet from a satellite.

They would need electricity first to power their devices unless Mark Zuckerberg has found a way to use a smartphone without electricity.

NantEnergy’s renewable batteries have already cut the need of 1 million lithium-ion batteries, and warded off the need to release 50,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide since 2012.

California is the flag-bearer in renewable energy policy by forcing its populace to be at 100% carbon-free electricity by 2045.

Musk is on record by saying he expects to break the 100-kWh level, which would contribute to better power storage and expedited electric vehicle (EV) adoption.

In contrast, energy storage analyst Mitalee Gupta at GTM Research has retorted that he’s “unsure $100/kWh is achievable this year.”

Musk, being a naturally optimistic entrepreneur, sets targets then does everything he can to break them.

Either way, two South African born visionaries are doing their part to crater the cost per kWh in the renewable energy market, and Elon Musk might not be the biggest disruptor from South Africa.

Time will tell if this market will become zinc-based or lithium-based – the higher-grade technology eventually wins out spelling doom for Musk.

But it appears that Musk has other things to worry about now.

NantEnergy plans to inaugurate a battery manufacturing facility in California next year.

As for Tesla, buy the car and not the stock.

And for Nio, don’t buy the car or the stock.

 

Disrupting the Disrupter

 

 

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Disrupting-image-1.jpg 412 296 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-10-01 01:06:542018-09-28 19:52:46Zinc Air Batteries Will Revolutionize Electric Cars
MHFTR

September 27, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
September 27, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(THE RATS ARE LEAVING THE SINKING SHIP AT FACEBOOK)
(FB)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-09-27 01:07:562018-09-26 19:04:48September 27, 2018
MHFTR

The Rats Are Leaving the Sinking Ship at Facebook

Tech Letter

It could end up all in tears for Facebook (FB).

This was the key takeaway from shocking news that Instagram’s CEO Kevin Systrom and CTO Mike Krieger quit on the spot.

The ideal word to describe this new development is devastation.

Ultimately, this could pave the way for Facebook to screw up Instagram.

Instagram was the crown jewel in Facebook’s portfolio and recently topped the 1 billion monthly active user (MAU) mark.

Leonardo da Vinci once famously said, "Poor is the pupil who does not surpass his master.”

When founder Systrom sold his company to Facebook for $1 billion in 2012, Instagram had 50 million monthly active users.

Preconditioned in the contract, Systrom was promised a high degree of autonomy that would allow him to grow Instagram as he saw fit.

The relationship was harmonious until 2018 when the pupil surpassed his master in innovation.

Instagram’s growth trajectory has been the envy of Facebook for some time, but that could be explained by the law of numbers and Instagram starting from a small base of users.

Peel back the skin and the situation has been festering for some time.

It came to light that Mark Zuckerberg issued a “throttling back” promotion and marketing for Instagram that peeved Systrom.

This crushed the referral numbers on Instagram, and it almost appeared that Zuckerberg wanted to deliberately bottleneck the growth of Instagram.

On the product engineering side, complication started to mount.

In the past, an Instagram photo uploaded onto Facebook was labeled with an Instagram insignia clearly showing the photo source came from Systrom’s company.

Zuckerberg tweaked this detail and removed the Instagram logo, making it seem that the content originated from Facebook.

Facebook started taking credit for Instagram’s content, and that sent Systrom bouncing off the walls inside his own company that was promised autonomy.

Even though this disagreement seems irrelevant, it showed the intent of Facebook going forward.

This was the beginning of the meddling behind the scenes, and the founder of Instagram aborted ship while he could.

Facebook stealing content and innovation from Instagram damaged Instagram’s team spirit as well.

It came to the point where Systrom saw no way out. After an extended paternity leave that gave him some free time to refresh his vision, he thought the only choice that Zuckerberg left him was to throw in the towel.

I have said numerous times that for Facebook to move on, Zuckerberg must relinquish his role as CEO.

Any CEO in the world operating at the performance level of Zuckerberg would have been sacked long ago.

Zuckerberg is an anomaly because of his stranglehold on voter’s rights excludes him from ever firing himself.

Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg is quoted as saying “people are fired at Facebook on a regular basis for not doing their jobs.”

People are fired at Facebook but not Zuckerberg.

Anytime the sushi hits the fan at Facebook, Zuckerberg conveniently fires others involved and washes his hands of the mess.

Granted, Instagram’s success was aided by Zuckerberg’s resources and Facebook’s embedded base, but this debacle is laid squarely on the Zuck’s shoulders.

Systrom and Krieger did not give a specific reason for the abrupt departure, which usually means they left unsatisfied.

Since they are the bosses of their own creation, the only factor could be personal or Facebook – easy to guess this one.

Instagram is starting to cannibalize its parent company - a major headwind for this company and stock.

Users are quitting Facebook in droves, and Zuckerberg’s only answer is to become Instagram, which Facebook already owns.

That is why the theft of credit due and engagement began in the first place.

The only bonkers move that could happen next is if Zuckerberg installs himself as the new CEO of Instagram.

Shareholders were biting their nails when they heard this news.

You would think Facebook would do everything they possibly could to entice Systrom and Krieger to stay.

They are the best thing going for Facebook right now.

In allowing this to happen, Facebook creates a massive leadership vacuum at the top of Instagram.

Whispers from Silicon Valley have one of Zuckerberg’s close friends taking over at Instagram, which would be a monumental error.

The outsized risk is if Instagram starts morphing into another Facebook, and engagement sours and usership drops like dead flies.

Facebook has demonstrated its misunderstandings of operating in a climate of big data concerns.

I have also documented how the digital ad industry will have a day of reckoning that is on the horizon, albeit not anytime soon.

Instagram’s CEO certainly closely observed how WhatsApp founders Jan Koum and Brian Acton ditched their brainchild after Zuckerberg rammed down their throats that he would accept the adoption of digital ads.

Former CEO Acton was in the news again, too. He harshly criticized the way Facebook operates, specifically slaughtering Sandberg’s greedy persona and unethical stance toward data privacy models.

In the same interview, he claims he was coached up to mislead European regulators and explain that combining these two data troves, Facebook and WhatsApp, would be near impossible when in reality it was not.

The European Commission fined Facebook $122 million two years later for false information in the original filing, and Facebook maintains these mistakes were unintentional.

If Facebook wants to use its business to practice crony capitalism and push the border of the truth, then it will catch up to them.

Zuckerberg’s imposing his will for the interests of himself and his best friends has been a growing trend at Facebook. As next quarter’s earnings season approaches, Facebook’s stock could get hit hard.

As momentum stagnates, shareholders are concerned that Zuckerberg is forcing out his best and brightest talents.

These decisions smell of desperation to control the company he created. And as fresh leaks about the mismanagement come to light, investors must stay away from Facebook.

Mismanagement at this company did not happen in one day.

Let’s trace back the performance of chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg a few years ago or her lack of it.

The executive was busy on her book tour around America that took her to many cities promoting her book “Lean In.”

She also wrote another book on top of that.

She even had time to promote her books on daytime talk show Oprah.

At the same time, Zuckerberg was in the middle of completing his personal goal of visiting the 30 states he had never set foot in before.

His “personal challenges” brought him in touch with real Americans, which is almost absurd, since it almost sounds as if he had grown up in Bangladesh, barely spoke a word of English, and is not American, which he is.

Another “personal challenge” of Zuckerberg was learning Mandarin Chinese and running through the smog of Beijing while being pictured in front of the Forbidden City.

When did Zuckerberg and Sandberg have time to run Facebook?

While the executive management was out of the office, the seeds of chaos were sown that all came to light after Sandberg and Zuckerberg were back.

The engineering team had excavated Russian state-sponsored hacking on the platform.

But since the entire 127-member security team worked under the tutelage of Sandberg, the engineering team’s discoveries remained unacted on.

Facebook engineers had also unearthed fake news operations located in Macedonia running riot on its website.

Since most security flaws originate from the engineer side in the form of fake news and manipulation, it’s hard to fathom how there were no channels of communication between the security team and the engineering side.

Sources inside of Facebook note that Sandberg’s business side of Facebook, and Zuckerberg’s engineering side almost mimic “two separate businesses that share the same campus.”

Exposing the manner in which Facebook is run makes it simple to diagnose the extent of major problems cropping up.

Effectively, Facebook grew so fast the past few years that it invited any type of growth – good, bad, and the ugly.

And it did nothing to root out the nefarious actors ruining the platform.

Now comes the hard part of cleaning up the bad and the ugly while segmenting out the good, and persuading the healthy users not to quit.

This will be expensive, time consuming, and awful for the future stock price.

The spillover effects are far from over.

Instagram’s founder and CEO Kevin Systrom quitting isn’t the disease – it’s a side effect.

The disease still hasn’t been cured and remains in the system.

Avoid Facebook shares as the FANGs have decoupled from this digital ad legacy firm.

The days of stellar growth are in the rearview mirror, and the stock won’t experience the parabolic price action it saw in the past.

Facebook needs major internal surgery in its management ranks. Until then, it’s a dysfunctional titanic unsure of when the next iceberg will hit.

Expect surprises, but surprises to the downside.

 

 

 

Kevin Systrom Says Goodbye on His Instagram Profile

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Kevin-Systrom-goodbye-image-3-e1537988114570.jpg 388 580 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-09-27 01:06:282018-09-26 19:04:16The Rats Are Leaving the Sinking Ship at Facebook
MHFTF

The Bull Case for Netflix

Tech Letter

Last quarter’s earnings report sent Netflix shares nosediving to the depths of the ocean floor, and the wreckage saw Netflix’s stock down 24% in 5 weeks.

The short-term weakness in shares was justified after Netflix miscalculated on their quarterly subscriber numbers.

Netflix is still a buy because the wreckage can be salvaged.

In fact, it was never a wreckage to begin with because Netflix boasts the highest grade online streaming product in the industry.

An industry that is benefitting from massive secular tailwinds at its back, from cord cutters and the widespread pivot to mobile platforms.

Netflix has the best product on the market because they have the best strategy – throw $8 billion on content alone and hire the best production team money can buy to churn out content.

The method to their madness has worked and the haul of 23 Emmy’s was a result of this winning formula.

The 23 Emmy’s tied HBO, whose premier series Game of Thrones is still captivating audiences with its mix of graphic sexual exploits and violent tropes.

Several of Netflix’s award winners saluted Netflix’s hands-off approach, who allow these highly paid production specialists the creative freedom to inspire audiences.

For all of Hollywood’s razzmatazz, director’s and actor’s number one major gripe has been that the leash is tight with minimal wiggle room.

It’s not straightforward to change a culture that has developed over a century.

Cross-pollinating Silicon Valley’s lean business model with Hollywood top-grade content was the trick that removed the shackles from the director’s ankles.

The end-product has been the main beneficiary.

Scoping out Netflix’s end of year lineup has viewers drooling.

The tail end of the year sees Netflix reintroduce some hard-hitting content from Orange Is The New Black, Ozark, Daredevil, Narcos, and Making a Murderer, side by side with fresh content involving Simpsons creator Matt Groening and blockbuster names like Jonah Hill and Emma Stone.

As well as shelling out $8 billion for original content, Netflix upped its marketing budget from $1.28 billion to $2 billion in 2018.

The $2 billion budget is a classy touch but at this point, this product more or less sells itself.

The brand awareness is that far-reaching.

The platform is optimized by tweaking Netflix’s proprietary recommendation algorithm herding the audience into viewing more content that the algorithm deems likely viewable.

The man who is in charge of this is Greg Peters - Netflix chief product officer.

Kelly Bennett, Netflix chief marketing officer, will work with Peters to wield the massive $2 billion marketing budget in the most effective way possible.

To insulate the company from any potential Facebook-like data slipups, Netflix poached Rachel Whetstone from Facebook to head up the public relations division.

Who said there were no winners from Facebook’s PR disaster?

Whetstone’s professional year of hell offers valuable insight into how not to pull another Facebook (FB) stinker.

She previously worked for Google and Uber and is a veteran PR spinner.

Earlier this year CEO Reed Hastings detailed the possibility of using ads in Netflix’s ad-less platform by saying this about why Netflix has no ads:

“It is a core differentiator and again we're having great success on the commercial-free path. That's what our brand is about. So we're going to continue to expand the relevance of a commercial free service around the world and make that so popular that consumers are very used to it and appreciate Netflix.”

The relevancy of his statement is more meaningful now after a recently released report confirming that Netflix is testing the usage of ads to promote its content.

This would be a huge shift in the company’s ethos, and if the algorithms give Hastings the green light, this could alienate a big chunk of their subscriber base.

In a survey conducted about the implementation of ads, 23% said they would quit the service if ads are rolled out onto Netflix’s platform.

Only 41% said they would “definitely” or “probably” keep Netflix if ads are introduced.

In the same survey, if Netflix lowers the monthly cost by $3 while integrating ads, the cancellation rate falls from 23% to 16%, and half said they would keep Netflix.

The most important number of the survey was that only 8% would cancel if they increased monthly prices by $2, but if it went up by $5, 23% would say goodbye to the streaming service.

All signs point to an incremental price increase in the near future, partly helping to offset the mind-boggling amount of content spend this year.

Netflix subscribers are still willing to absorb price increases which is a great sign for future profitability.

But it is also worth mentioning that Netflix is a profitable company now, and margins have been slowly creeping up for the past few years.

The tests demonstrate that Hastings is serious about profitability at a time when the premier profit machines in tech are Apple (AAPL) and Alphabet (GOOGL).

These two behemoths blaze the trail for the tech sector and offer important lessons on the potential future profitability of Netflix.

It will take time for Netflix to reach that level of profitability, but the pillars are in place to ramp up the monetization drive.

The treasure trove of data will surely help decision making for the management, but to make their platform more like Facebook (FB) would be a huge error of epic proportions.

It’s proven that digital ads are annoying like a swath of mosquitoes trapped in your bedroom at 2am.

To dilute the quality of their product would fly in the face of what the company represents.

So how on earth will Netflix’s shares go from the mid-$300’s and reach the glorious heights of $400-plus and stay there?

One word – India.

It’s no secret that Netflix has been charging hard to rev up international business.

India is the trump card.

India boasts around 78 million middle class dwellers who can afford Netflix’s service.

In the next two years, it’s feasible that 10% of this socioeconomic class could be tuning into Netflix.

That foothold into India could mushroom, and potentially expand with an audience whose DNA is comprised of a strong film culture.

As broad-brand broadband expansion and smartphone penetration heating up in India, Netflix’s timely arrival could make Netflix look genius.

Their arrival coincides with a slew of American tech companies looking to tap revenue out of the largest democracy in Asia.

The unrealized potential cannot be ignored.

Netflix has primed their strategy by focusing on locally-produced content that will resonate with the Indian viewer.

Netflix’s India strategy started red hot with crime thriller Sacred Games imbued with a level of unfiltered, real filmmaking unseen in India.

The dark crime drama is already facing a legal battle concerning its lusty, foul-mouthed content that presses on the outer limits of what modern Indian society can handle.

The stereotype breaking series directed by Vikramaditya Motwane and Anurag Kashyap is Netflix’s first Indian feather in their cap as Netflix looks to accelerate the momentum.

Netflix has not produced back to back quarters where they failed to meet subscriber growth forecasts since 2012.

I firmly believe Netflix will continue this successful streak and beat subscriber estimates in the third quarter.

Initial indications show that Indians have gravitated towards Netflix’s original content, and with the 2018 Russian World Cup in the history books, the path has opened up for some nice surprises to the upside.

 

NETFLIX’S FUTURE - INDIA

________________________________________________________________________________________________

Quote of the Day

"Health care and education, in my view, are next up for fundamental software-based transformation." – Said Silicon Valley Venture Capitalist Marc Andreessen

 

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Netflix-India-e1537382336566.png 248 400 MHFTF https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTF2018-09-20 01:05:372018-09-19 21:07:00The Bull Case for Netflix
MHFTR

September 13, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
September 13, 2018
Fiat Lux

 

Featured Trade:
(THE THREAT TO YOUR DIGITAL LIFE FROM CHATBOTS),
(FB), (GOOGL), (MSFT)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-09-13 01:06:122018-09-12 20:07:42September 13, 2018
MHFTR

The Threat to Your Digital Life from Chatbots

Tech Letter

Not all tech will survive.

Come hell or high water, chatbots are not going away today but have an ugly fate with the tech graveyard of past technologies in the near future.

The rise of pervasive technology has brought consumers a wave of modern technology – some useful and some that go straight rogue.

Microsoft (MSFT) was on the receiving end of tech gone bad when its Tay bot was duped into spewing anti-Semitic and racist blather.

Bill Gate’s brainchild allowed Tay to behave according to what it learned from fellow users with which it interacted.

The developers forgot that not all Internet speak is nice and bubbly.

In another humiliating episode, cyberhackers wielded a chatbot to masquerade as a woman asking men to hand over credit card information in order to become verified on the raunchy dating app Tinder.

Manipulating an app platform has been a favorite of cyberhackers where users blindly trust these brands with which they have become familiar, and barely question the motives behind these strange developments.

As cybercriminals endlessly hunt for monetization and opportunities ramp up, chatbots represent a critical vehicle to pillage prospective victims.

These examples are just two that were publicly reported.

In reality, flashpoints are widespread, and users are usually completely unaware that they are being victimized.

Some chatbots are even out just for data harvesting among other targeted activity.

The dark web is the perfect marketplace to sell hijacked data.

Many Internet users believe they can feel safe and secure behind the auspices of end-to-end encryption.

However, users seem to forget that this type of foolproof security has its limitations.

The easiest way to become exposed is by the other person on the other end of the message.

They can turn you in.

Paul Manafort found this out the hard way when the FBI seized messages from the people he sent them too.

WhatsApp, owned by Facebook, along with chat app Signal are the best ways to keep chats confidential if you trust the other party. This is where the conversation disappears in about ten seconds.

However, just because WhatsApp is secure now, does not mean it will be secure tomorrow.

WhatsApp co-founder and CEO Jan Koum quit in a vicious row against Facebook’s upper management flipping off the rogue ad-seller as the relationship came to a screeching halt.

He later said he was quitting to collect “rare air-cooled Porsches” and play “ultimate frisbee.”

Facebook plans to weaken WhatsApp’s encryption levels and is intent on harvesting the data to eventually install a digital ad business to this ad-less messenger.

Facebook has shown a blatant disregard to privacy. Plan on everything you have ever sent on WhatsApp being privy to all the workers in the Facebook office at some point in the near future.

In some eerie way, Facebook mimics the hackers that maneuvered around Tinder’s developers, but in a completely legal way showing zero concern for its end user.

That is a scary thing.

Facebook has become borderline criminal in the court of public opinion in Europe. And that sentiment has seeped into the hearts of minds of Americans as well, and rightly so.

In short, the tidal wave of junk tech such as chatbots and Facebook spinning your information to the hills will end badly.

The public has smartened up and cannot be misled by Facebook’s privileged management spouting out that its “values” are different as an excuse for obvious debacles.

The global chatbot market was $369.79 million in 2017, and by 2024, this industry will balloon to $2.17 billion.

Chatbots will have a ubiquitous presence in work and daily life.

Companies desire to curtail rising costs, and are doubling down on the chatbot revolution.

The current obstacle is that artificial intelligence (A.I.) is just not good enough yet for chatbots to comprehensively serve customers and never will be.

The chatbots rely on the data in their systems to solve problems to difficult questions, but humans need to receive answers on the fly in the case of multi-part complications.

Chatbots spectacularly fail at this endeavor.

Even worse, chatbots cannot empathize with a furious customer and feel out customers’ emotions to properly optimize the perfect solution.

And in some instances, humans do not feel at ease to discuss certain topics with software code.

Then there is the generational difference of age groups preferring to use what they are familiar with.

For older generations, this absolutely means speaking to a real human who lives, breathes, and sleeps at night.

Younger generations who grew up never going outside but instead addicted to a screen have an easier time routing their lives through technology.

Granted, chatbots are effective when answering rudimentary questions to direct the customer to a department where they will soon be talking to a human. But chatbots are not the solution to every customer service problem.

Then there is the question of whether a rogue chatbot is going to disperse your data to a nefarious hacker or even behave like Microsoft’s Tay chatbot.

Facebook is already a legal entity that disperses personal data for money.

As the tech sector advances, the weak technology will crash and burn.

Low-quality social media platforms such as Facebook and inferior technology-like chatbots will succumb to the same fate as the woolly mammoth.

Investors are experiencing this massive migration up in quality as the public and investors are doing everything to insulate themselves from the dark side of technology.

In a further blow to user-generated platforms Facebook and Alphabet’s Google (GOOGL), Brussels voted in favor of a law that would force tech companies to actively filter out copyrighted content uploaded to their platforms.

This will crimp profitability for the two giants, as the data and content received for free is being put under a stronger microscope.

Europe is doing everything it can to disrupt these two companies from their free lunch, and they are fed up with the negligence and arrogance in which they run their platforms.

This was evident when Europe slapped Alphabet on the wrist with a $5 billion antitrust penalty earlier this year.

Chatbots will eventually face the public opinion death squad, as fatigued Internet users will completely avoid chatting with software code and move their businesses to the competitor.

The ultimate problem tying chatbots and Facebook together is the utter lack of attention to the customers’ needs.

These two phenomena exist to make more corporate money in a myopic fashion.

Every shortcut available will be taken and has been taken.

Facebook will never be able to monetize its website like the pre-Cambridge Analytica scandal days. It will take a sweeping reset, most importantly dethroning Mark Zuckerberg from his perch in Menlo Park, California, to reinvigorate this lost firm.

Chatbots will not exist in a few years and technology will move on to more effective solutions.

It is the end of bad tech as we know it, as technology is evolving so fast, yesterday’s conquerors become todays pariah’s in just a few years.

 

 

 

Chatbots – A Flash in The Pan Tech

 ________________________________________________________________________________________________

Quote of the Day 

"Our goal has never been to make the most. It's always been to make the best,” said CEO of Apple Tim Cook.

 

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Iphone-image-3-e1536782011404.jpg 437 325 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-09-13 01:05:002018-09-12 20:07:07The Threat to Your Digital Life from Chatbots
MHFTR

September 12, 2018

Diary, Newsletter, Summary

Global Market Comments
September 12, 2018
Fiat Lux

THE FUTURE OF AI ISSUE

Featured Trade:
(THE NEW AI BOOK THAT INVESTORS ARE SCRAMBLING FOR),
(GOOG), (FB), (AMZN), MSFT), (BABA), (BIDU),
(TENCENT), (TSLA), (NVDA), (AMD), (MU), (LRCX)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-09-12 01:07:272018-09-11 20:53:08September 12, 2018
MHFTR

September 10, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
September 10, 2018
Fiat Lux

 

Featured Trade:
(GOOGLE’S BREAKFAST OF ROTTEN EGGS),
(TWTR), (FB), (GOOGL), (MSFT), (AMZN)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-09-10 01:06:592018-09-07 18:49:55September 10, 2018
Page 39 of 49«‹3738394041›»

tastytrade, Inc. (“tastytrade”) has entered into a Marketing Agreement with Mad Hedge Fund Trader (“Marketing Agent”) whereby tastytrade pays compensation to Marketing Agent to recommend tastytrade’s brokerage services. The existence of this Marketing Agreement should not be deemed as an endorsement or recommendation of Marketing Agent by tastytrade and/or any of its affiliated companies. Neither tastytrade nor any of its affiliated companies is responsible for the privacy practices of Marketing Agent or this website. tastytrade does not warrant the accuracy or content of the products or services offered by Marketing Agent or this website. Marketing Agent is independent and is not an affiliate of tastytrade. 

Legal Disclaimer

There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.

Copyright © 2025. Mad Hedge Fund Trader. All Rights Reserved. support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • FAQ
Scroll to top