Mad Hedge Technology Letter
February 14, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(FACEBOOK’S NEW PROBLEM),
(FB), (GOOGL), (TRIP), (EXPE)
Tag Archive for: (GOOGL)
A major catalyst exacerbating recent tech layoffs has been a decline in referral traffic to news publishers from Facebook (FB).
Blame the algos!
Referral traffic is a way of reporting visits coming from a site from sources outside of the original site.
When someone clicks on a hyperlink leading to a different website, data analytics classified this as a referral visit to the second site by tracking mechanisms.
The truth is that news publishers have a painfully smaller window to monetize content than ever before and this opinion is echoed by some of big media’s stalwarts such as Rupert Murdoch, the chairman of News Corp.
Facebook decided to give preference to content in the news feed that is shared between Facebook users over those by news organizations, ironically, the news is being stripped out of the news feed whether that seems logical or not.
Under the guise of protecting the platform, Facebook is applying this ploy to further cut off users from escaping its walled garden trapping them inside for the purpose of clicking around the Facebook website even more.
As the technology evolves, companies are becoming increasingly pedantic in finding any practical method of allowing users to escape to another part of the internet.
Diminishing user time equals fewer clicks followed by reduced digital advertising revenue.
Another shift in Facebook rules entails elevating and demoting media outlets by trust levels and credible content that ultimately Facebook makes the decision on.
The algorithms in this case would prop up the more renowned institutions and essentially cut out minnow news organization.
Algorithms are inherently biased, and sources of revenue are cut off or opened up by these algorithmic shifts.
The monopolistic status of Facebook has made it near impossible for stand-alone firms to develop organically and ramping up digitally means leveraging Facebook ads to lure new customers.
What does this all mean?
News publications are bracing themselves for an atrocious year.
The side effect from recent changes mean that Facebook will ultimately become the God of the news cycle choosing which news populates where on the news feed or if it shows up at all.
Being a left-leaning company, Facebook is likely to anoint left-leaning news organizations as “trustworthy” while demoting more right-wing news feeds pushing them further down the pecking order.
And for marginal start-up news companies praying for any exposure, this is effectively a death sentence because of the lack of footprint inside of Facebook’s current database.
Machine learning cannot account for new developments in the system, let alone system altering shifts causing this technology to be defective.
The technology handsomely rewards the entrenched that have cultivated a big footprint inside the database that decisions hinge on.
Its backward-looking nature to carry out a business that is forward-looking is utter nonsense.
Many third-party businesses attempt to stimulate Facebook users’ appetite in order to bridge them over and act as a stepping stone to their own website.
Small businesses should prepare for an era where this type of digital reach is stunted and at some point, completely disengaged.
Effectively, Facebook and the rest of the FANGs will do its best to cut off outside activity preferring to keep usership in-house.
News organizations are feeling the full brunt of these ripple effects with online media firms such as Vox Media and BuzzFeed cutting staff in response to these Facebook algorithm changes.
Which industry will get chopped down next?
Online travel aggregators.
TripAdvisor (TRIP) had a great winter quarter in 2018, but looking down the line, the business model could get bogged down by the algorithm problem.
For instance, take the best flight purchase algorithm in the world Google Flights.
The United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division approved Google's $700 million purchase of ITA Software in 2011.
Within a few months, Google bent its algorithm into shape and reformulated it as Google Flights.
How does it stack up?
Easy to use, lack of digital ads, best of breed, and innovative are all ways I would describe this service.
That is why consumers prefer Google Flights over any other service.
It offers open-ended searches making the traditional flight search software seem pathetic.
Simply input the departure location and Google Flights will show the user every price to every location in the world on a visual map.
It’s travel transparency at its brightest and users can change trips in an instant if something attractive catches their eye.
The user can mix and match different destinations and dates until an optimal time and place can be calibrated along with a suitable price.
This gives the power back to the consumers.
Once in a while, dispersion between the Google Flight price and the official airline site price can be irritating, but the accuracy has improved over time.
Truth be told, it’s a waste of time to use a different flight search engine now after the existence of Google Flights.
Google is able to do this because they are masters at building algorithms and have an army of engineers at their disposal.
Online flight brokers such as Expedia (EXPE) and TripAdvisor are on a collision course for the beast that is the Google algorithm division.
This dovetails astutely with my overarching theme of technology destroying every broker industry because FANG algorithm teams do a way better job enhancing this segment of business than anyone else.
As you correctly guessed, I am bearish Expedia and TripAdvisor long term.
Travel fare aggregators can’t compete with Google and former CEO of Expedia Dara Khosrowshahi was smart to take the head job at Uber saving him from the future carnage.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
February 7, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE DEATH OF THE COLLEGE DEGREE),
(GOOGL), (IBM), (AAPL), (BABA), (BIDU)
If you’re an educator not at a top 25 American university, you might want to stop reading right now.
Disruption.
You’re either on the right or wrong side of it.
I’ve detailed numerous subsets of the economy and society that have been transformed by sharp shifts in technological innovation.
But the one industry that has stealthily moved into the heart and center of technological disruption is education.
For centuries, universities and higher learning institutions had a stranglehold on critical information required to successfully perform in the cutting-edge knowledge economy of those times.
Then on September 15, 1997, a mere 21 years ago, Google search launched its free services to the world and grabbed the monopoly of information away from the college system.
This website effectively caused the cost of information to crater to zero and its free website is ranked #1 as of February 2019 with over 4.5 billion monthly active users.
The ensuing 21 years has been a renaissance in the ability to distribute information propelled by this one platform, and the result is that billions have the ability to study and read up on what they want and when they want.
The ability to learn for free combined with a tight labor market is a promising landscape for job seekers, with analysts forecasting more opportunities for professionals without a degree.
Job-search site Glassdoor amassed a list of various employers no longer bound by requiring applicants to possess a 4-year bachelor’s degree.
These firms aren’t your second-rate companies either made up of gold standard workplaces such as Google, Apple, and IBM.
In 2017, IBM's vice president of talent Joanna Daley confided that about 15% of IBM’s new hires don't have a four-year bachelor qualification.
She emphasizes hands-on experience through coding boot camp or industry-related vocational classes as explicit criteria to get hired.
This development bodes poorly for the future of universities and boosts the prospects of alternative education.
Online college offers working adults ample flexibility in furthering their education.
According to the most recent federal statistics from 2016, roughly one out of every three, or 6.3 million college students learned online.
Even though online courses are becoming more widespread, the best and brightest aren’t attending these schools.
However, it did hijack the marginal student that was on the fence for a 4-year university and brought them into the orbit of for-profit online courses and the revenues that came with it.
That was the first stage of online forces imposing financial pressure on the education marketplace.
Now analysts are discovering the second major trend with higher rated students opting out of the university system altogether.
In many cases, a 4-year university degree is a bad value proposition.
Why is that?
Costs.
In a capitalistic economy that lives and dies by the mantra of buy low and sell high – universities seem to be getting sold short lately.
The exorbitant costs to obtain a 4-year degree has led to an outsized student debt bubble and removed the mystique of this once treasured qualification.
A growing chorus of bipartisan voices has pigeonholed student debt as a major problem across the country.
In the previous presidential election, Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders called this situation “outrageous” as national student debt has spiraled out of control to the amount of $1.5 trillion.
This has been a terrible commercial for the younger generations to follow in the footsteps of the indebted Millennial generation.
And with Generation Z tech savvy at building stand-alone firms buttressed by Instagram and YouTube platforms, why go to college anymore?
Or to nail one of those jobs developing iPhones in Cupertino, why not take a few coder boot camps and self-develop a portfolio impressive enough to score an Apple interview?
The bottom line is that there are workarounds for a fraction of the price.
And because tech firms have outpaced analog companies in salaries and hiring for the past two decades, there is an outsized bias on compiling technical skills that will lead a candidate down a path to a salary of over $100,000 quicker than a 4-year degree can.
Not many other industries can claim the same.
The cracks are beginning to reveal themselves in the overall university apparatus.
Universities had years of record revenue that they reinvested into the system to enhance programs, staff, buildings, stadiums, and infrastructure.
The financial catalyst was the rise of the Chinese college student.
The latest statistics nailed the number of Chinese nationals in America studying for 4-year degrees at over half a million.
Many of those were trained up with engineering-related degrees and bolted back home to find jobs at Baidu (BIDU), Tencent, or Alibaba (BABA) powering Chinese Inc.
However, the drop off in demographics from young Chinese and Americans are forcing universities to fight for a shallower pool of candidates with less attractive degrees relative to the value of degrees of past generations.
The second-tier universities are hardest hit with examples galore.
Alcorn State University in Mississippi saw a dramatic 69.45% decrease in applications in 2018 and its rural location didn’t help either.
Alabama State University is feeling the pinch with a 33.06% drop in application in recent years.
If you thought the University of New Orleans was clawing its way back to relevancy after Hurricane Katrina, you are mistaken with its 38.23% drop in applications.
Military schools haven’t been spared either with applications to The United States Air Force Academy crashing 28.12% over the past ten years.
A confluence of deadly trends is about to beset the university system and schools will likely go bust.
Technology is giving a reason for students to bypass the system while also speeding up the financial timebombs many universities are about to confront.
Then we must ask ourselves, will universities even exist in the future?
Probably, but perhaps just the top 25 elite schools that are still worth the high costs.
IS IT STILL WORTH IT?
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
February 6, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(ALPHABET WOWS THEM AGAIN),
(GOOGL), (AMZN), (AAPL), (MSFT)
Alphabet (GOOGL) is entangled in the same imbroglio as Apple (AAPL), that is why I have held back on issuing any trade alerts on this name.
The stalwart is still grinding out a respectable 20% of revenue growth in their core business but the underlying conundrum is that their hyper-growth segments are 5 times or more diminutive than their bread and butter of digital ads.
Apple is addressing the same type of strain in attempting to flip high octane revenue drivers into a bigger piece of the pie – the services business trails the hardware business by a large margin.
This phenomenon highlights how investors demand tech companies to grow at elevated rates and a maturing business model isn’t given any free passes.
Investors simply migrate towards higher growth names period.
That being said, Alphabet’s digital ad business is one of the premier tech divisions in all of technology and the American economy.
How powerful is it?
They did $32.6 billion in sales last quarter.
If you look at that number without context, it is quite impressive, but there are several lurking impediments.
This 20% QOQ growth is flatter than a pancake offering evidence that the best days are behind them.
No investors like to hear the dreaded “P word” thrown into a company’s business trajectory – peak.
In respect to revenue growth rates, I expect Google’s digital ad business to gradually decline relative to competition.
This segment also battles with the law of large numbers.
It’s simply difficult to accelerate revenue rates at a 25% YOY clip when revenues are already over $30 billion per quarter. Again, this is another Apple problem and a side effect of being overly successful in one part of the business model.
If investors' tepid reaction about these aspects of the core business telegraph dissatisfaction, then discovering further ancillary problems might be the final dagger in the heart.
Google search’s price per click cratered 29% YOY indicating that variables in the current marketing environment have significantly blunted Google’s pricing power.
Traffic Acquisition Cost (TAC) represents the cost for a company to acquire internet traffic onto their assets.
Alphabet faced a 15% YOY rise in TAC costs last quarter to $7.44 billion illustrating the difficulty in keeping these high costs down.
The bulk of the $7.44 billion stems from a widely known agreement with Apple contracting Google search as its default search engine on Apple devices.
This TAC expense has been surging the past few years and Alphabet has little negotiating power.
Expect an annual 15-20% rise in TAC expenses as long as Alphabet’s digital ads are expanding the standard vanilla 20% most investors expect them to grow.
As a whole, TAC costs soaked up 23% of the digital ad revenue which was in line with analysts’ expectations.
However, I expect this number to surpass 25% before winter because I believe Google search’s ad business will confront ceaseless growth problems.
Amazon’s (AMZN) new-found digital ad business is an influential factor in this story.
New marketing dollars aren’t being showered on Google as they once were, over 50% of product searches populate from Amazon.com today boding poorly for the future of Google search.
This optionality could be a large reason in driving the cost per click downwards.
CEO of Amazon Jeff Bezos refused to enter the digital ad game for years but his recent change of heart will correlate to subduing Google digital ad model.
Consumers are finding less incentive to search on Google for products when they just can smartly and efficiently search on Amazon directly.
Clearly, this only affects product searches and not searches on other informative content such as widely popular searches including “top 10 places to travel in Europe” or “best Thanksgiving recipes.”
Google’s “other revenues” is chugging along nicely with 31% YOY growth headed by Google’s cloud business and hardware division.
This is what Alphabet needs to focus on going forward similar to Microsoft and Amazon web services.
Yes, Google is the 3rd biggest cloud player but miles behind the top two.
Being in catch-up mode is no fun and is part of the reason capital expenditures exploded and came in $1.38 billion higher than expected.
Alphabet simply isn’t doing a good job at executing relative to Amazon and Microsoft frittering away more capital in the name of growth but not curating the type of growth that current expenses justify.
Higher costs damaged operating margins coming down 2% YOY to 21%.
Even more worrisome is that there has been no material progress on the Waymo business.
This is the year that Alphabet expected the technology to roll out to the masses.
However, this broad-based integration will not happen as fast as they would like.
I blame regulation and consumers' hesitation to quickly adopt this new technology.
Alphabet is reliant on this business to carry them to the next level of growth and I believe it can become a $100 billion per year business in a $2 trillion addressable market.
But when you peruse through the “Other Bets” category which houses Alphabet’s other companies such as health venture Verily, the $154 million in revenue was a huge miss against the $187.4 million expected.
Estimates aside, the pitiful fact that Waymo only brings in revenue of less than 1% of total revenue is disappointing.
Summing things up, Alphabet is a great company and is a long-term buy and hold stock even with short term transitory headaches.
In the near term, there is uneasiness about the decreasing profitability, exploding expense factors, a heavy reliance on weakening core business revenue, and a lack of top-line contribution of “other revenues” relative to their core business.
Long term, Alphabet’s game-changing investments have yet to show signs of life in terms of real revenue expansion even though Alphabet is the global leader of artificial intelligence and self-driving technology.
Investors would like to see actionable steps to incorporate this best of breed technology that funnels down to the top and bottom line.
Investors are stuck with a stale digital ads business that has locked the stock into a holding pattern essentially trading sideways for the past year until they prove they are ready to take the next step up.
Looking at Alphabet’s chart, the stock has iron-clad support at $1,000 which it tested in April 2018 and December 2018.
Using this entry point as the lower range would be sensible as I don’t foresee any demonstrably negative news blindsiding the stock, and I surmise that investors will start receiving positive news on Waymo’s roll out towards the middle of the year.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
February 5, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE FINTECH COMPANY YOU’VE NEVER HEARD OF),
(FISV), (AAPL), (GOOGL), (FDC), (PYPL), (SQ)
Here’s a company for you involved in technology’s tectonic shift towards FinTech in 2019.
They aren’t new, but you’ve probably never heard of them.
It’s Fiserv Inc. (FISV) which sells financial technology and can include customers such as banks, credit unions, securities broker-dealers, leasing, and finance companies.
An inflection point is occurring within the global business and that is financial technology and the rapid integration of it.
Financial institutions are building products around this concept and Fiserv has a head start on the others with more than 30 years of experience in aiding banks, thrifts, and credit unions, managing cash and processing payments, loans, and account services.
The Wisconsin-based company constructed an unstoppable machine leveraging its time-honored relationships and expertise to bring banking to all the screens that pervade daily life.
“Innovation, Integration and Scale” has been the motto that has served this company well for so long.
The company cut its teeth in the trenches helping banks move money long before it became the next big thing.
Five years ago, under the leadership of CEO Jeff Yabuki, there was a corporate flashpoint with upper management realizing they needed to evolve or die.
Yabuki anticipated a near future fueled by mobile wallets and changing consumer expectations - an always-on, never-off connected world.
An environment where consumers want what they want when they want it.
There has been no letup in this trend.
Silicon Valley companies were always the 800-pound gorilla in the room and Fiserv didn’t want to become sideswiped by them.
And in 2014, at the Money 20/20 conference in Las Vegas, Yabuki set out his vision that continues to prevail today.
The financial services industry had become obsessed with point-of-sale transactions.
And at $200 billion in annual domestic sales, it was a business that resonated to all corners of the FinTech world.
It was sensical to persuade consumers to use branded credit or debit cards to pay for stuff in stores and online.
At the time, that was bread-and-butter banking.
To the banks' chagrin, Silicon Valley has gotten in on the act with the likes of Apple (AAPL), Alphabet (GOOGL), PayPal (PYPL), Square (SQ) firing warning shots.
They formulated products of their own, whipped up the necessary scale and maximized the reverberating network effects.
Yabuki urged financiers at the conference to double down on what they did best while looking to grab low-hanging fruits in the short-term.
The business beyond point-of-sale was theirs waiting on a decorative platter – the opportunity was a $55 billion behemoth consisting of consumer-to-consumer, business-to-business and consumer-to-business transactions.
Embracing FinTech translated into massive speed advantages, stauncher security-laced products while offering traditional bank customers higher quality service at their convenience.
Fiserv erected a platform to help financial institutions focus on payments beyond POS called Network for Our World.
The goal of this NOW Network was to help customers' flow of money by paying bills and getting paid.
These entrepreneurs are looking for more efficient ways to collect money owed - they are a lucrative addressable audience for bankers.
The Fiserv sales pitch is working wonders according to the data. The company has 12,000 clients worldwide, with 85 million online banking end-users.
It has rolled out innovative products for payments, processing, risk and compliance, customer service and optimization.
The company has become ever so profitable with a 3-year EPS growth rate of just 15%, but in the last quarter, this metric surged to 23% and projected to rise.
Fiserv also dabbled with some M&A hauling in debit-based assets of Elan Financial Services.
The stellar acquisition, with annual revenue of over $170 million, extends Fiserv’s leadership in payments, broadens client reach and scale, and provides new solutions to enhance the value proposition of the existing 3,000 debit solutions clients.
The deal also gave Fiserv ownership of Money Pass, the second largest surcharge-free ATM network in the U.S., with over 33,000 in-network ATMs.
They also added other major pieces with the purchase of First Data Corp (FDC).
The maneuver is strategically solid, and Fiserv will benefit from a parlay of idiosyncratic opportunities from the combined synergies.
Fiserv will be able to refer First Data's merchant-acquiring services to the banks it currently works with.
I predict cost savings of $1 billion from the deal and potential upside from platform rationalization, which has not yet been included in synergies.
There will be significant upside potential from interest expense savings given refinancing FDC's debt at investment-grade.
Dipping your toe into this name before its multiple inevitable expands is a good long-term strategy.
Profitability is increasing while management has made moves that will fatten its top line business from the 5% internal growth today.
All these growth levers will push up revenues in the upcoming quarters - Fiserv happens to be the right company in the right industry at the perfect time in the technology cycle.
The stock is up over 1,000% in 10 years.
In February 2009, the stock was meddling around $8 and the $83 it trades at today demonstrates the potency of FinTech and the strength in their underlying business model.
I would wait for a sell-off to get into this one, but it’s a keeper.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
January 29, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(WHATS BEHIND THE NVIDIA MELTDOWN),
(QRVO), (MU), (SWKS), (NVDA), (AMD), (INTC), (AAPL), (AMZN), (GOOGL), (MSFT), (FB)
Great company – lousy time to be this great company.
That is the least I can say for GPU chip company Nvidia (NVDA) who issued a cataclysmic earnings alert figuring it was better to spill the negative news now to start the healing process earlier.
This stock is a great long-term hold because they are the best of breed in an industry fueled by a secular tailwind in GPUs.
But this doesn’t mean they will be gifted any freebies in the short term and, sad to say, they have been dragged, kicking and screaming, into the heart of the trade skirmish along with Apple (AAPL) and buddy Intel (INTC) amongst others.
The best thing a tech company can have going for them right now is to have no China exposure, that is why I am bullish on software companies such as PayPal, Twilio, and Microsoft.
I called the chip disaster back in summer of 2018 recommending to stay away like the plague.
The climate has worsened since then and like I recently said – don’t buy the dead cat bounce in chips because the bad news isn’t baked into the story yet or at least not fully baked.
It’s actually a blessing in disguise if banned in China if you are firms such as Facebook (FB), Google (GOOGL), and Amazon (AMZN).
I recently noted that a material end to this trade war could be decades away and the tech world is already being reconfigured around the monopoly board as we speak with this in mind.
Where do things stand?
The US administration took a scalp when Chinese communist backed DRAM chip maker Fujian Jinhua effectively shuttered its doors.
Victory in a minor battle will likely embolden the US administration into continuing its aggressive stance if it is working.
If you forgot who Fujian Jinhua was… they are the Chinese chip company who were indicted by the U.S. Justice Department for stealing intellectual property (IP) from Boise-based chip behemoth Micron (MU).
The way they allegedly stole the information was by poaching Taiwanese chip engineers who would divulge the secrets to the Chinese company buttressing China in pursuing their hellbent goal of being able to domestically supply enough quality chips in order to stop buying American chips in the future.
Officially, China hopes to ramp up its self-sufficiency ratio in the semiconductor industry to at least 70% by 2025 which dovetails nicely with the broader goal of Chinese tech hegemony.
Fujian Jinhua was classified as a strategically important firm to the Chinese state and knocking the wind out of their sails will have a reverberating effect around the Chinese tech sector and will deter Taiwanese chip engineers to act as a go-between.
According to a research note by Zhongtai Securities, Jinhua’s new plant was expected to have flooded the market with 60,000 chips per month and generate annual revenue of $1.2 billion directly competing with Micron with their own technology borrowed from Micron themselves.
Jinhua’s overall goal was to support a monthly manufacturing target of 240,000 chips spoiling Chinese tech companies with a healthy new stream of state-subsidized allotment of chips needed to keep costs down and build the gadgets and gizmos of the future.
For the most part, it was unforeseen that the US administration had the gall and calculative nous to combat the nurtured Chinese state tech sector.
However, I will say, it makes sense to pick off the Chinese tech space now before they stop needing American chips at all in 5-7 years and when all remnants of leverage disappear.
The short-term pain will be felt in the American chip tech sector which is evident with the horrid news Nvidia reported and the aftermath seen in the price action of the stock.
Nvidia expects top line revenue to shrink by $500 million or half a billion – it’s been a while since I saw such a massive cut in forecasts.
Half of revenue comes from the Middle Kingdom and expect huge downgrades from Apple on its earnings report too.
If this didn’t scare you, what will?
These short-term headwinds are worth it to the American tech sector as a whole.
To eventually ward off a future existential crisis when Chinese GPU companies start offering outside business actionable high quality chips curated with borrowed technology, funded by artificially low debt, and for half the price is worth its weight in gold.
The same story is playing out with Huawei around the globe but at the largest scale possible.
This is what happens when the foreign tech sector is up against companies who have access to unlimited state loans and is part of wider communist state policy to take over foundational technology globally.
I will also emphasize that the Chinese communist party has a seat on every board at any notable Chinese tech company influencing decisions at the top even more than the upper management.
If upper management stopped paying heed to the communist voice at the table, they would be out of business in a jiffy.
Therefore, Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei standing at a podium promulgating a scenario where Huawei is operating freely from the government is what dreams are made of.
It’s not a prognosis rooted in reality.
The communist party are overlords breathing down the neck of Huawei after any material decisions that can affect the company and subsequently the government’s position in the interconnected world.
The China blue print essentially entails a pan-Amazon strategy emphasizing large volume – low cost strategy.
Amazon was successful because investors would throw money at the company until it scaled up and wiped the competition away in one fell swoop.
Amazon is on a destructive path bludgeoning every American second-tier mall reshaping the economic world.
The unintended consequences have been profound with the ultimate spoils falling at the feet of CEO and Founder of Amazon Jeff Bezos, his phalanx of employees as well as Amazon stockholders which are mostly comprised of wealthy investors.
Well, Chairman Xi Jinping and the Chinese communist party are attempting to Amazon the American tech sector and the broader American economy.
The American economy could potentially become the second-tier mall in this analogy and the game playing out is an existential crisis for the likes of Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), Nvidia, Micron, Intel and the who’s who of semiconductor chips.
If stocks reacted on a 30-year timeframe, Nvidia would be up 15% today instead of reaching a trading day nadir of 17%.
What is happening behind the scenes?
American tech companies are moving supply chains or planning to move supply chains out of China.
This is an epochal manifestation of the larger trade war and a decisive development in the eyes of the American administration.
In fact, many industry analysts understand a logjam of failed trade solutions as a bonus to the Chinese.
However, I would argue the complete opposite.
Yes, the Chinese are waiting out the current administration to deal with a new one that might be more lenient.
But that will take another two years and publicly listed companies grappling with the performance of quarterly earnings don’t have two years like the Chinese communist party.
And who knows, the next administration might even seize the baton from the current administration and clamp down even more.
Be careful what you wish for.
Taiwanese company and biggest iPhone assembler Foxconn Technology Group is discussing plans to move production away from China to India.
India is a democratic country, the biggest democracy in Asia, and is a staunch ally of the United States.
CEOs of Google (GOOGL) and Microsoft (MSFT), some of Silicon Valley heavyweights, are from India and American tech companies have been making generational tech investments in India recently.
Warren Buffet even invested $300 million in an Indian FinTech company Paytm.
When you read stories about India being the new China, well it’s happening faster than anyone thought and on a scale that nobody thought, and the underlying catalyst is the overarching trade war fueling this quick migration.
Apple is already constructing low grade iPhones in India in the state of Karnataka since 2017, and these were the first iPhones made in India.
They won’t be the last either.
Wistron, major Taiwanese original design manufacturer, has since started producing the iPhone 6S model there as well.
And it is no surprise that China and its artificially priced smartphones have undercut Samsung and Apple in India grabbing the market share lead.
This is happening all over the emerging world.
And don’t forget if U.S. President Donald Trump revisits banning American chip companies supply channels to Chinese telecom company ZTE. That would be 70,000 Chinese jobs out the window in a nanosecond.
The current administration has drier powder than you think and this would hasten the deceleration of the Chinese economy and also move forward the American recession into 2019 boding negative for tech shares.
Therefore, I would recommend balancing out a trading portfolio with overweights and underweights because it is obvious that tech stocks won’t be coupled to a gondola trajectory to the peak of the summit this year.
It’s a stockpickers market this year with visible losers and winners.
And if China does get their way in the tech war, American chip companies will eventually become worthless squeezed out by mainland competition brought down by their own technology full circle.
They are first on the chopping board because their overreliance on Chinese revenue streams for the bulk of sales.
Among these companies that could go bust are Broadcom (AVGO), Qualcomm (QCOM), Qorvo (QRVO), Skyworks Solutions (SWKS) and as you expected Micron and Nvidia who are one of the main protagonists in this story.
