• support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Member Login
Mad Hedge Fund Trader
  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Luncheons
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Tag Archive for: (GOOGL)

MHFTF

The Reliability of Adobe

Tech Letter

Tech companies have a habit of suddenly coming and going because of the nature of the relentless environment that spits out losers and celebrates winners.

It’s hard-pressed to find software companies that pass the test of time but there is one that is healthily chugging along that most people know quite well.

Adobe (ADBE) was established 35 years ago in co-founder John Warnock's garage.

This legacy software company’s name, Adobe, was named after the Adobe Creek in Los Altos, California, which ran behind Warnock's house.

Adobe cut its teeth in an era when tech CEOs were not larger-than-life cult figures, and all Adobe has done is quietly infiltrating its way into everybody’s devices by way of Adobe Flash Player and its smorgasbord of useful software applications.

Adobe acquired Macromedia in 2005 which was responsible for building Adobe Flash Player.

This Macromedia software has been developed and distributed by Adobe Systems ever since the purchase and its functions involve viewing multimedia contents, executing rich internet applications, and streaming audio and video. Flash Player can run from a web browser as a browser plug-in or on supported mobile devices.

Flash player was its second hit success software program after its Adobe Acrobat and Reader software introduced PDF, the Portable Document Format, which is still ubiquitously used today even after all these years.

Most software companies are relatively new to the scene and like companies I have recently written about such as Zendesk (ZEN) and Twilio (TWLO), they can brag about growing sales of 30% or 40% plus per year.

Adobe isn’t too shabby itself growing sales at over 24% annually – remarkably high for such an ancient tech company.

The company’s strengths are similar to that of Apple (AAPL) – high-quality products and high profitability.

There will be no back-to-back doubling of the stock like some hyper-growth tech stocks because Adobe doesn’t subscribe to the type of growth trail that Square (SQ) has blazed.

What you can expect from Adobe is a slow grind up in share price stoked by its outperforming EPS expansion and acceptable sales growth of mid-20%.

Its annual operating margins have essentially tripled since the beginning of 2015 from around 10% and now boasts an Apple-like 30%.

There are no bones about it – Adobe has high-quality software across its diversified portfolio.

Other Adobe software products universally soaked up are its stable array of graphic design software such as Adobe Photoshop and Adobe Dreamweaver.

Adobe has also ventured into video editing, animation, and visual effects with Adobe Premiere Pro.

Not only that, Adobe has forayed into more conventional types of software such as digital marketing management software and server software.

Simply put, Adobe’s assortment of digital media software products has a religious-like following especially for iOS users.

As you might have guessed correctly, the lion’s share of Adobe’s revenue stream stems from its software as a service (SaaS) segment contributing 80% to the top line.

More narrowly, the digital media segment makes up almost 70% of the subscription-based revenue. This division will expand at least 20% each year boding well for Adobe to maintain its 20% plus sales growth that any legacy software company would sacrifice a right leg to achieve.

It’s digital marketing software products rub up against stifling competition in Alphabet (GOOGL) amongst others and contribute a less robust 30% to overall sales.

I am less bullish on this part of the business because they have it rough competing against one of the Fangs, the path of less resistance clearly sides with its bread and butter of the digital media offerings.

Its subscription-based pricing model was the catalyst for boosting profitability causing the stock to experience massive price gains. The stock has doubled in the past two years which is unheard of for most legacy software companies.

No longer does Adobe need to manufacture the ancient CD of yore physically delivering it to customers, users can briskly download these products directly from the official website, receive constant upgrades over broadband internet, and pay Adobe monthly for their humble services.

In fact, any investors looking for some hot software stocks only need to find companies that recently shifted to a subscription-based pricing model. It’s pretty much a license to print money if the software quality can backup the monthly costs for the user.

I can tell you that Adobe’s software has remained world class, embedded at the heart of most digital devices at home and in the office, and who would have thought that just a little shift to the pricing model would have doubled the stock price?

Well, instead of one-off sales, Adobe can book revenue month after month, and year after year demonstrating the supercharged effect of shifting to a recurring revenue stream model.

Highlighting the pivot to profitability is Adobe’s three-year EPS growth rate of 48% turning this company into a mammoth software company with a $117 billion market cap.

Another positive for Adobe’s future sales are its fertile addressable markets in Europe and Asia.

There is ample room to expand in these geographical regions with Europe already chipping in with almost $2 billion of revenue per year and Asia with another $1 billion.

Future harvests look even more bountiful.

These two regions make up almost 40% of sales and as the Asian middle class is poised to elevate a giant swath of its people to middle class, Adobe will be a handsome beneficiary of this trend as middle-class families tend to pump out more university graduates who migrate to software-based occupations.

Even though Adobe isn’t the sexiest name out there, it certainly is in the category of “safe.”

In no way do I see an eradication of its embedded software spread widely throughout the tech universe.

Its digital media software tools are best-in-show and loyally followed with a long-lasting revenue stream that has room to grow abroad.

Do not expect Adobe to debut any earth-shattering products, but I fully anticipate Adobe to become even more profitable to the point that they might offer a dividend or reallocate capital to shareholders through stock buybacks.

Apple has similar strengths in its business model, albeit on a much grander scale.

I feel that Adobe doesn’t get the credit it deserves because of its steady as it goes drivers that keep motoring higher in an industry that adores groundbreaking products that revolutionize the world.

I would wait for a major sell-off because a double in two years has bid up the stock to expensive levels represented in its premium forward PE multiple of 35.

However, as the conclusion of the mid-term elections offers some certainty to the market, tech stocks could get swept up in a positive rush to round out the year.

Luckily for Mad Hedge Tech readers, this is the golden age for software companies and we are just scratching the surface of the capability software efficiencies can deliver to small and large companies across every bit of the economy.

Another Apple-like similarity is that Adobe is annually voted one of the best places to work according to Fortune, stacked up against companies represented across the full economic spectrum and not just tech.

If you have a kid, tell him to find a job in San Jose, he or she could find worse places to cut a paycheck.

 

 

 

 

 

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTF https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTF2018-11-07 01:06:082018-11-06 16:44:20The Reliability of Adobe
MHFTF

October 31, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
October 31, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(IBM’S PUTS ON A RED HAT)
(RHT), (IBM), (AMZN), (MSFT), (GOOGL), (ORCL)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTF https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTF2018-10-31 01:07:382018-10-30 18:01:37October 31, 2018
MHFTF

IBM’s PUTS on A Red Hat

Tech Letter

What took you so long, Ginni?

That was my first reaction when I heard International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) was making a big strategic shift by purchasing open source cloud company Red Hat (RHT) in a landmark $34 billion deal.

Ginni Rometty, IBM’s CEO since 2012, has presided over persistent negative sales growth and has done zilch for investors to conjure up some type of lasting hope for this company.

Not only has Rometty failed to grow the top line, but with an underwhelming 3-year EPS growth rate of -2%, the execution and performance haven’t been there as well.

Somehow and someway, she has maintained an iron-clad grip on her job at the helm of IBM and her legacy at IBM will be wholly determined by the failure or success of this Red Hat acquisition.

IBM shares sold off on the news as shareholders digested this bombshell.

Rometty took a hatchet to share buybacks and suspended them for 2020 and 2021 alienating a segment of their loyal shareholder base.

I can tell you one thing about this move – it smells of desperation and it won’t vault IBM into the conversation of Amazon (AMZN) Web Services or the Microsoft (MSFT) Azure.

The biggest winner of this deal is Red Hat’s CEO Jim Whitehurst who has been dangling the company for sale for a while.

Alphabet (GOOGL) was in the mix and had the opportunity to snag a last-second deal, but it never came to fruition.

The 63% premium IBM must pay for a company who only grew quarterly sales 14% YOY and quarterly EPS by 10% is expensive, but that is where we are with IBM.

Clearly overpaying was better than doing nothing at all.

IBM continues to hemorrhage sales and stopping the blood flow is the first step.

Rometty was responsible for the utter failure of artificial intelligence initiative Watson whose terrible management was a key reason for its implosion.

Analyzing this historic company gave me insight into the pitiful causing me to write a bearish story on IBM last month. To read that story, please click here.

Not only was the agreed price exorbitant, but Red Hat’s stock was trending south even before the interest rate induced sell-off rocked the tech sector of late.

Red Hat missed on sales revenue forecasts and offered weak guidance.

It could be the case that Whitehurst was actively seeking a buyer because he felt that Red Hat would go ex-growth in the next few years.

Red Hat was rumored to be on the market for quite a while looking to fetch a premium price for a company starting to stagnate with its visions of grandeur growth.

Rometty’s career-defining moment is high-risk and high-reward and is born out of being cornered by leading tech companies leaving IBM in their dust.

The deal finally allows IBM to return back to sales growth which will occur two years later, and Rometty will finally have that monkey off her back for now.

But the bigger question is will Rometty still have her job in two years if this experiment becomes toxic.

My guess is that Red Hat CEO Jim Whitehurst is automatically the next in line for the IBM throne if Rometty missteps, and piling on pressure will force IBM to evolve or die out.

And even though they will return back to growth, 2% growth is no reason to do cartwheels over.

The real work starts now and it will take years to turn around this dinosaur.

On the brighter side, the massive deals instantly improve sentiment that was flagging for years and puts IBM back on the map.

The synergies between IBM and Red Hat could be robust.

Red Hat can surely help IBM become a higher-quality hybrid cloud solutions company.

Models like this are the industry standard as luring a company into your cloud is one thing, but being able to cross-sell a plethora of extra add-on software services in the cloud is the necessary path to raising profitability.

IBM also inherits a slew of talented software engineers that it can mobilize for innovative cloud products. Red Hat’s products such as JBoss middleware and the OpenShift software for deploying applications in virtual containers could make IBM’s hybrid cloud more appealing and could help retain customers with the additional offerings.

Doubling down on the software side of the business was a strategy I pinpointed at the Mad Hedge Lake Tahoe conference and deals like this highlight the value of this type of assets.

There is a hoard of legacy tech companies like Oracle (ORCL) that is in dire need of such strategic injections and fresh ideas.

This won’t be the last deal of 2018, other cloud deals could shortly follow.

On the other side of the coin, hardware deals have turned rotten quickly with stark examples such as Hewlett-Packard’s (HPQ) $25 billion acquisition of Compaq, Microsoft’s $7.2 billion disastrous buy of Nokia’s mobile handset business and Google’s unimpressive $12.5 billion deal for Motorola Mobility that they later unloaded to Chinese PC company Lenovo.

Investors must be patient if IBM has any chance of completing this turnaround.

Listening to Rometty talk about this deal clearly reveals that she is hyping it up for something way bigger than it actually is.

Let’s not forget that Rometty’s tenure as CEO began in 2012 when IBM shares were trading north of $200 and she has presided over the company while the stock got pulverized by almost 30%.

It pains me that she is the one given the chance to turn the company around after years of underperformance.

Let’s not forget that at the end of 2017, IBM only had a 1.9% share of the cloud infrastructure, about 25 times smaller than Amazon Web Services.

The costly nature of the deal could also put a dent into IBM’s dividend, alienating another swath of its hardcore shareholder base.

Historically, IBM has had minimal success with transformative M&A and the industry competitors dominating IBM magnify the poor management performance headed by Rometty.

Rometty declaring that this deal means IBM will be “no. 1 in hybrid cloud” is overly optimistic, but this is a move in the right direction and could keep IBM spiralling out of control.

A return to sales growth might help stem the bleeding of its downtrodden share price, but Amazon and Microsoft are too far ahead to catch.

Investors will need to wait and see if the synergies between IBM’s and Red Hat’s products are meaningful or not.

 

 

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTF https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTF2018-10-31 01:06:502018-10-30 19:46:32IBM’s PUTS on A Red Hat
MHFTF

October 23, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
October 23, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(THE CLOUD FOR DUMMIES)
(AMZN), (MSFT), (GOOGL), (AAPL), (CRM), (ZS)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTF https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTF2018-10-23 09:02:412018-10-22 20:20:01October 23, 2018
MHFTF

October 22, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
October 22, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(FACEBOOK’S DARPA DALLIANCE),
(FB), (GOOGL), (AAPL)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTF https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTF2018-10-22 09:02:082018-10-19 21:15:30October 22, 2018
MHFTF

Facebook’s DARPA Dalliance

Tech Letter

How far will society and government allow tech companies to adventure before there is some blowback?

Honestly, it’s hard to say when to put the shackles on these companies that are getting too powerful for their own good.

Tech companies have been pedal to the medal pushing the limitations of what the human world can offer.

The hoard of profits showered on the tech giants is one thing, but should they be held accountable for the unintended consequences that there robot-like profit-making operations dump on society?

Each company has chosen different ways to deploy the capital. Apple decided to reward shareholders by executing a $100 billion share buyback program.

The stock has performed great this year.

Apple (AAPL) and CEO Tim Cook have been keen to show a trustful face among a growing phalanx of data misusers.

Facebook (FB) has used the surplus capital to build a secretive research center modeled after the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) called Building 8.

DARPA is an agency of the United States Department of Defense responsible for the development of emerging technologies for military use.

The division of the government was launched in 1958 by United States President Dwight D. Eisenhower to counteract the Soviet launching of Sputnik 1 in 1957.

DARPA smartly partnered together with America’s business leaders, academia, and other talents dotted around the government and military branches to develop projects that would broaden the frontiers of technology and science far beyond immediate U.S. military current needs.

Building 8 met the real world for the first time when its first product Portal, a vertically-shaped display screen attached to a smart camera, debuted with befuddlement.

How does a company that just announced a breach of 50 million accounts, after a torrid string of mishaps which made a mockery of Facebook’s use of big data, launch a device that gives Facebook unfettered access into the confines of one’s personal home?

A Facebook spokesman said that Facebook will “use this information to inform the ads we show you across our platforms. Other general usage data, such as aggregate usage of apps, etc., may also feed into the information that we use to serve ads.”

Executives at Facebook know that this product would be a commercial write-off, but the sunk cost associated with this project forced them to throw it on the market with reckless abandon.

And at the end of the day, some data is better than no data at all and that is what the earth’s existence is boiling down to.

So, if you thought that Facebook might finally decide to stop being your effective cyber-stalker, you are wrong.

And this is all just the beginning, it gets a lot worse than this, let me explain.

In fact, Facebook’s Building 8 was led by the former Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Regina Dugan.

The more I sniff around, the more I see her pawprints everywhere she went.

Dugan used her elite role at DARPA to score a job at Google’s (GOOGL) Advanced Technology and Projects (ATAP) group before she jumped ship to Facebook’s secretive research center Building 8.

Dugan’s tenure at DARPA from 1996 to 2012 meant she was privy to the LifeLog project which was developed for just one year and subsequently shut down.

This program was cancelled after heavy criticism from activists advocating privacy and rightly so.

But, was this program really shut down?

Lifelog was a program with the mission to effectively record all of an individual’s physical movements, conversations and everything they listened to, ate, read and bought.

Everything!

The premise of this program was to cultivate a permanent searchable record of one’s life.

The daredevil program was light years ahead of its time predating the iPhone, tablet, and the current wave of populism engulfing the free world.

Back then, the weaponizing of consumer technology was largely absent from the world, and the top brass of DARPA surely wasn’t naïve enough to believe that this technology could only be applied to create an epic cyber-diary of one’s life.

In any case, Dugan conveniently was employed by Google and Facebook and her knowledge of Lifelog was fluid, deep and comprehensive.

Unintended consequences are rife and, if I connect the dots, it appears that DARPA’s Lifelog found new spawning grounds in Silicon Valley’s richest companies, or at least two of them.

There is no way to know for sure, but monetizing Lifelog’s cyber-record technology to harness it as a tool to collect personal information for the use of digital ad targeting has rained profits down on these two companies.

Building 8 is serving up round two of its DARPA-esque mission by announcing that they have built a prototype producing an armband that will facilitate the understanding of oral language “through a person’s skin.”

It was in January 2017 when Dugan took the stage in San Jose at a conference to announce this project.

It was mostly dismissed as fantasy and something out of science fiction.

Well, it’s one more step closer to being rolled out in mass market form.

The way the language process works is that vibrations allow for the roots of words to be transformed into silent speech.

If scientists manage to do this, it would give deaf people a new lifeline giving them the capability to understand what people are saying without the need for lip reading.

However, on the other side of the coin, the technology could be modified to aid spies in eavesdropping if the range of the vibrations allows them to.

The second project announced by Dugan that same night in San Jose was Facebook’s bold attempt of a noninvasive brain sensor designed to turn thoughts into text.

This would require brain surgery to install a sensor, and the plan for this technology is for people to access devices from their brain without the need to physically or orally communicate with it.

I suspect that Facebook would collect the data from this brain sensor and the sensor would be in contact with the Facebook infrastructure sharing the performance and state of operations.

If the sushi hits the fan and a person dies from the sensor, Facebook would need to analyze the specific details in the malfunction.

What a scary thought.

Facebook adopting the DARPA blueprint from its halted project of Lifelog to respawn similar technology that painstakingly retrieves as much data about our lives as possible is the first step to something substantially bigger.

However, the digital ad business has made Facebook and Google insanely rich and they want an encore.

I am surprised that other Silicon Valley cash-rich companies avoid tapping up the offspring of other military-grade technology to join the profit parade.

Apparently, there has been zero backlash from it.

If Facebook somehow manages to roll-out a commercialized brain sensor giving Mark Zuckerberg access to our minds, I wonder what on earth could round three entail for Zuckerberg…

Nothing is impossible.

 

 

 

Facebook’s Building 8 - First Product

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Building-8.png 654 733 MHFTF https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTF2018-10-22 09:01:182018-10-22 08:49:36Facebook’s DARPA Dalliance
MHFTF

October 18, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
October 18, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(UNDERSTANDING THE REAL COMPETITION),
(SPOT), (AAPL), (GOOGL), (MSFT), (HUAWEI)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTF https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTF2018-10-18 09:02:302018-10-17 18:19:43October 18, 2018
MHFTF

Understanding the Real Competition

Tech Letter

Microsoft sells computers?

That was the bizarre look I got after telling my friend that Microsoft (MSFT) is in the business of selling laptops, desktop computers, and tablets that convert into laptops from a product line called Microsoft Surface.

This is not your father’s Microsoft.

Things are different now.

Everything changed once they got rid of Steve Ballmer whose inertia prevented Microsoft from taking advantage of the huge influence they culled in the tech sector from being the universal operating system for PCs.

Ballmer’s lack of technical expertise was his own downfall stemming from his terrible decision to buy Nokia’s handset business for $7.6 billion.

The board of directors forced him out and was a blessing in disguise.

Thousands were laid off in the Nokia handset division and a massive write-down was taken.

As big tech spread out their wings and branch off into various businesses they never imagined before, they have reinvented the former images of themselves.

This goes for Microsoft who’s taking their legacy business of Microsoft Office and Windows and leveraging it with the cloud to create a stellar product.

And with the cash hoard, not only are they creating new products by fusing together old products with new technologies, they are overlapping into other big tech companies’ turf.

The overlapping products can be seen in hardware products made by this software behemoth and their neighbors.  

The Microsoft Surface division is up 25% YOY speaking volumes to the quality hardware Microsoft produce now even if you didn’t know about it.

Apple (AAPL) has attracted most of the conversation in the "smart" headphones space because of the AirPods.

The sleek white earbuds are becoming ubiquitous with the headphone space trending to a smaller and "true" wireless.

A schism has formed as the AirPods don’t satisfy the entire spectrum of smart headphone fans.

The retro ear-muff shaped headphone with more immersive sound is what I am talking about, and I do recognize that Beats has been in the market for a decade.

Microsoft chose to go this route with their smart headphones and this is their answer to the iconic AirPods and the Google (GOOGL) Pixel Buds.

This smart headphone comes with an embedded digital assistant and integrates noise cancellation.

I tried out the Microsoft's Surface Headphones before they came on the market, and I only had positive things to say about the quality and experience.

They sound impressive, the controls are easy to use, and the modern design is definitely a plus.

The color could use a little reimagination but all in all, I was pleased.

Microsoft Cortana, Microsoft’s digital assistant, for all who don’t know, is also slipped into the experience and a tap on the right earcup will summon Cortana.

It seems that Microsoft still needs a few kinks to work out with Cortana, but voice activation and smart assistants like Siri and Google Assistant can be found in almost every hardware and software product now.

Headphones are city workers’ second most important smart device because of its functionality.

Have you ever been on the New York metro and seen how many people are wearing smart headphones?

Quality headphones shut off the outside world and warm up the insides with the user’s favorites on Spotify (SPOT) or Apple Music.

Stressing out on the commute into work in an Uber is common and calming the frayed nerves before workers enter into the office of dungeons and dragons has a type of value that can never be replicated.

Urban dwellers need high-quality smart headphones and these big tech companies are acutely aware of this.

Google has made an audacious attempt to integrate real-time foreign translation into the Pixel Buds. It only works with Google’s Pixel phones, is hard to operate, and needs the Google Translate app on the phone.

It’s a good first step but the applications using smart headphones are endless.

Smart assistants are the key.

As they become more adept at processing the real world, they streamline and better a human’s life.

Microsoft’s smart headphones have embedded Skype, one of Ballmer’s positive acquisitions during his tenure. And with Cortana integration, it could morph into a natural extension of the Windows 10 experience.

Microsoft’s smart headphones morph into a point of conversion for more of Microsoft’s hardware products as they start to construct an expanding moat.

Headphones used to be more or less the same.

Plug it into the jack and you’re on your merry way.

The headphones of today are looking more different from each other with every iteration.

This was glaringly evident when Apple chose to no longer sell any phones with a 3.5mm headphone jack.

Ironically enough, Google dumped the headphone jack with its Pixel 2 phones a year later even though they bashed Apple for it a few months earlier.

The reason was mainly functional as Google said, “We want the display to go closer and closer to the edge.”

Gradually, smartphones will get rid of everything except a razor-thin screen. All the other clunky business in and around it needs to go. This is the first step and home buttons have been chopped off smartphones as well.

It is fine to get consumed in the battle of smart products between Silicon Valley companies, but there is a larger threat.

Chinese smart products are rapidly catching up to what American companies can produce.

The Middle Kingdom hasn’t surpassed American tech expertise yet but they are debuting devices relative to the competition that could only be dreamed about a few years ago.

Huawei's flagship smartphone Mate 20 and Mate 20 Pro pack a lot of punch and this must be frightening to the FANGs.

The timing of the phone debut is a big victory for American smartphone companies because this phone is good enough to grab market share from existing American companies but aren’t allowed to sell inside America.

Congress putting the kibosh on any sliver of a chance to partner with an American carrier means that there will be no chance of Chinese phones gutting the American smartphone market.

What it does mean is that they will invade and dominate other markets such as South East Asia, Eastern Europe, and Russia.

The same will go for any Chinese smart device.

Huawei has given up trying to circumvent the government blockade.

The Huawei Mate 20 is priced around $800 and the Mate 20 Pro at $1140. They are probably two of the best smartphones ever made and are a direct threat to any American company’s revenue that manufactures smartphones and smart devices.

 

 

 

 

 

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTF https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTF2018-10-18 09:01:042018-10-18 08:55:17Understanding the Real Competition
MHFTF

October 16, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
October 16, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(IS IT REALLY ESSENTIAL OR NOT?),
(AAPL), (GOOGL), (MSFT), (AMZN)

 

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTF https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTF2018-10-16 09:02:212018-10-15 18:35:39October 16, 2018
MHFTF

Is it Really Essential or Not?

Tech Letter

He is at it again.

No, not Elon Musk, but Andy Rubin – the Godfather of the Android operating system could create another ground-breaking shift in the world of technology.

Apple’s (AAPL) iOS system was the leader of the pack until Rubin’s timely intervention.

When Apple debuted the iPhone and, shortly after, the Apple app store, there was nothing remotely comparable at the time.

The roaring success of the iPhone and its app store could have been so much more to the global smartphone audience if it consumed everybody.

You could smell broad-based world domination, but it never materialized.

Android now has 85% of the global smartphone market share, and Apple has carved out the last 15% albeit in the high-income markets.

You can thank Microsoft (MSFT) for all of this – let me explain.

Android was hands down the best purchase ever made by Google for a paltry sum of just $50 million.

It was in 2005 when Android was bought by Google and Rubin’s work commenced overseeing the construction of a platform that could avoid licensing restrictions dragging down the industry.

Android was initially commissioned by Google to build a platform to stymie another potential Microsoft monopoly, but this time, in the mobile space.

Google didn’t want to be blown away by Microsoft as the pivot to mobile was picking up steam.

Google assumed that Microsoft had the best chance to execute the shift to mobile because of the universal acceptance of the Windows operating system.

And little did they know that Steve Jobs had a game changer up his sleeve when he rolled out the iPhone.

The premise was very simple for Android - offer supreme customer value, massively scale a global platform, and catalyze explosive growth.

Easier said than done.

In the end, Rubin was able to generate a blanketed adoption of the Android operating system in smartphones.

Apple has been, by and large, the victor of hardware because even though the Android system is more popular, the manufacturer of Android-based phones cuts across a broad swath of different international companies from Google itself to Samsung, LG, and the various Chinese makers.

Around half of Americans are proud to be an iPhone owner and Apple was able to ensure they were the only manufacturer of their proprietary iOS system harvesting all the profits.

Onlookers aren’t giving Android the credit it duly deserves in the global scheme of things.

Fortunately for Google and Rubin, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer fudged his opportunity while Palm, Symbian, and BlackBerry never stuck around either for recorded posterity. It could of easily have gone the other way.

Android has become so entrenched in non-iPhone smartphones that Google was fined $5 billion for being too dominant in Europe or for what regulators tout as illegally cementing their position. The battle is still going on in court with a final verdict coming shortly.

What does Rubin have on the menu this time?

After establishing his own private company to battle the tech Goliaths, he built an initial smartphone that was an unmitigated flop.

The Essential PH-1 smartphone offered a stock Android experience meant to appeal to the medium-tiered smartphone market.

The phone had solid hardware, enough juice in it to be competitive, a poor camera, and it did little to stand out from the crowd. There are many other cheaper substitutes with better brand recognition selling similar enough devices.

In general, it is a passable smartphone, but the initial price point was a reach in this ultra-competitive climate.

Sales were an outsized bust barely able to penetrate the American smartphone market.

Sprint offered the phone for $699 and registered 5,000 sales in the first month.

To put it into perspective, Apple routinely sells 40 or 50 million smartphones per quarter.

The Essential phone was discounted down to $499 in an attempt to salvage revenue. That didn’t work either.

You can now buy the phone on Amazon.com (AMZN) for $378.

All told, the phone did about 150,000 in sales and Rubin needed to rethink his vision.

Even as recently as this spring, takeover rumors swirled because of Essential’s stable of engineering firepower.

The vultures never swooped and Essential is back with a vengeance building their second phone - Essential Phone PH-2

To stem the tide and make their mark in the smartphone industry, Rubin decided Essential needed a fresh strategy requiring immense chutzpah.

Smartphones have essentially become commoditized in the mid-tier range and consumers look for the best specs at the lowest price point. Samsung has made a living picking off this type of buyer.

Rubin decided to align his future product with the technology that will change the world – artificial intelligence.

Artificial intelligence will be incorporated into the design for the phone to work for the user without him using it.

Yes, that’s right, the user will not have to even have his paws on the phone. The artificial intelligence will mimic the user’s behavior and carry out its functions and tasks alone.

Rubin said, “You can be off enjoying your life, having that dinner without touching your phone and you can trust your phone to do things on your behalf.”

This audacious strategy is a risky bet that consumers will be comfortable enough with artificial intelligence to allow them to venture out alone into this complicated world with no checks and balances from the user themselves.

Imagine some catastrophic scenario if the artificial intelligence taps into a user’s bank account and begins deploying hard-earned capital to exotic locations all over the world.

Smartphone competition has effectively made smartphones widely available for most of the world, but cultivating a smartphone company from scratch requires a dose of creative intuition.

Betting on the development of artificial intelligence is one of the few weapons in Rubin’s toolkit.

This could be Rubin’s last attempt at a smartphone and moving further out onto the risk curve means this could be a whale of a failure or a spectacular success. I can’t imagine his investors allowing him to produce another failed smartphone.

My bet is that consumers aren’t ready to absorb the type of levels of artificial intelligence that Rubin hopes to infuse into his new phone.

Even if he lays an egg, he will be back on another project in no time. That is the sort of slack you get by being the godfather of the Android operating system. Funding is as lush as a tropical forest.

Secretly, I want him to succeed because the world needs positive disruption to the Silicon Valley cohort of megacompanies from independent sources.

My bet is that a smartphone will not be the revolutionary new product the world is clamoring for. It’ll be something we have never seen before.

Please click here to visit Essential’s website.

A GOOD PHONE BUT TOO SIMILAR TO THE REST

 

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Essential-phone-oct16.png 543 974 MHFTF https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTF2018-10-16 09:01:592018-10-16 08:59:08Is it Really Essential or Not?
Page 63 of 77«‹6162636465›»

tastytrade, Inc. (“tastytrade”) has entered into a Marketing Agreement with Mad Hedge Fund Trader (“Marketing Agent”) whereby tastytrade pays compensation to Marketing Agent to recommend tastytrade’s brokerage services. The existence of this Marketing Agreement should not be deemed as an endorsement or recommendation of Marketing Agent by tastytrade and/or any of its affiliated companies. Neither tastytrade nor any of its affiliated companies is responsible for the privacy practices of Marketing Agent or this website. tastytrade does not warrant the accuracy or content of the products or services offered by Marketing Agent or this website. Marketing Agent is independent and is not an affiliate of tastytrade. 

Legal Disclaimer

There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.

Copyright © 2025. Mad Hedge Fund Trader. All Rights Reserved. support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • FAQ
Scroll to top