Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 11, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(WHY YOU SHOULD BE BETTING THE RANCH ON TECHNOLOGY),
(AMZN), (NFLX), (FB), (Samsung), (Tencent)
Posts
Global IT spending is forecasted to surpass $3.7 trillion in 2018, a boost of 6.2% YOY, according to a report released by leading technology research firm Gartner, Inc. (IT).
This year is the best growth rate forecasted since 2007, and is a precursor to a period of flourishing IT growth.
IT budgetary resilience is oddly occurring in the face of a tech backlash engulfing Mark Zuckerberg as collateral damage during higher than normal volatility due to an unstable geo-political environment and nonstop chaos in the White House.
Zuckerberg's reputation has been torn to shreds by the media and politicians alike.
Tech has had better weeks and months, for instance as this past January when tech stocks went up every day. Facebook (FB) still had a great business model in January as well.
The biggest takeaway from the report was the outsized capital investments going into enterprise software, which spurs on exponential business formation.
Enterprise software will successfully record its highest spend rate increasing by 11.1% YOY to $391 billion. This is far and away an abnormally fast pace of increase, but is completely justified based on every brick and mortar migrating toward data harnessing.
The software industry will benefit immensely by the universal digitization of all facets of life as software acts as the tool that businessmen use to propel companies to stardom.
Application software spending will healthily rise into 2019, and infrastructure software also will continue to grow, boosted by the revamping of laggard architecture.
Data center systems are predicted to grow 3.7% in 2018, down from 6.3 percent growth in 2017. The longer-term outlook continues to have challenges, particularly for the storage segment.
The lower relative rate of spend is exacerbated by the chip shortage for memory components, and prices have shot up faster than previously expected.
The new Samsung Galaxy 9 cost an additional $45 in semiconductor chip costs because of the importunate costs that sabotage cost structures.
Exorbitant pricing was set to subside in the early part of 2018, but the dire shortage of chips is here to stay until the end of 2018.
Even though the supply side has ramped up 30%, demand is far outpacing supply, spoiling any chance for tech devices to be made on the cheap.
Global spend for digital devices will grow in 2018, reaching $706 billion, an increase of 6.6 percent from 2017. Not only will we see the standard characters such as phones and tablets, but new creative ways to produce devices in the micro-variety will soon populate our shores.
Amazon Alexa and Apple's HomePod are just the beginning and will spawn micro-devices that would fit nicely into a flashy James Bond film.
The demand for ultra-mobile premium smartphones will slow in 2018 as more consumers delay their upgrade and feel comfortable using older devices -- kind of like a smashed-up Volvo station wagon handed down from sibling to sibling.
In times of uncertainty, corporations hold back spending until the near-term variables can be flushed out, and unforeseen costs causing operational turbulence can be anticipated.
However, the industry has brushed aside the turmoil that has attempted to infiltrate the core growth story.
Investors cannot overlook that total tech spending growth for 2018 is the highest in the past 15 years.
Next quarter's earnings are now on tap, and investors will turn to fundamentals as a cheat sheet for what's in store.
It's undeniable that currently tech stocks aren't cheap anymore. They are also more expensive than they were at the beginning of the year barring Facebook and a few other stragglers.
The momentum has intensified with the five biggest tech firms accounting for more than 14% of the S&P 500 index's weighting.
Tech's relative performance has fended off the bears with PE multiples down a paltry 4.9% this year compared to the cratering of 11.4% in the general market.
And tech is still trading at a tiny fraction of the crisis of the dot-com era.
The outsized reinvestments back into business models don't tell the tale of an industry brought down to its knees begging for salvation.
Look no further than across the Pacific Ocean. Samsung Electronics Co. represents almost 25% in South Korea's Kospi index. At the same time, Asia's most valuable company, Tencent Holdings, makes up almost a 10% weighting in Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index.
Back stateside, about 90% of US tech firms beat revenue estimates in the last quarter of 2017, marking the best success rate for any industry.
The positive sentiment has continued into this year with wildly bullish expectations led by the FANG stocks.
The broader volatility is a gift to investors who hesitated and missed the monster rally that has graced tech the past few years.
Tech is vital to emerging markets. And this is the first year since 2004 that tech constitutes the biggest sector in the MSCI Emerging Markets Index blowing past financials.
Tech had a 28% weighting at the end of 2017, the weighting more than doubling from six years ago.
As it stands today, tech enjoys light regulation and by a long mile. Tech is actually the least regulated industry in America and has used this period of light regulation to stack up profits to the sky.
Banks are nine times more regulated than tech companies, and manufacturing companies are five times more regulated.
Legislation such as Dodd-Frank has done a lot to taper the excesses of the sub-prime frenzy that almost took down Wall Street.
The lean regulation has helped tech companies such as Facebook and Google build a gilt-edged competitive advantage that has been exploited to full effect.
After the Fed closed the curtains on its QE program, tech and its earnings are the sturdiest pillar of the nine-year bull market.
The Street is reliant on the big players to earn its crust of bread and show investors that tech isn't just a flash in the pan.
The two numbers acting as the de-facto indicators of the health of the overall economy are Netflix's subscriber growth numbers and Amazon's AWS Cloud revenue.
These two companies do not focus on profits and are the prototypical tech growth companies.
If they beat on these metrics, the rest of tech should follow suit.
The market is entirely dependent on big tech to drag investors through the time of transition. My bet is that tech will over-deliver booking stellar earnings.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"By giving the people the power to share, we're making the world more transparent." - said Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 4, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(SPOTIFY KILLS IT ON LISTING DAY),
(SPOT), (DBX), (GOOGL), (AAPL), (AMZN), (CRM), (NFLX), (FB)
The banner year for the cloud continues as Dropbox's (DBX) blowout IPO passed with flying colors.
Investors' voracity for anything connecting to big data continues unabated.
Big data shares are now fetching a big premium, and recent negative news has highlighted how important big data is to every business.
Let's face it, Spotify (SPOT) needs capital to reinvest into its platform to achieve the type of scale that deems margins healthy enough to profit, even though it says it doesn't.
Big data architecture takes time to cultivate, but more importantly it costs a huge chunk of money to construct a platform worthy enough to satisfy consumers.
The daunting proposition of competing with the FANGs for users only makes sense if there is a reservoir of funds to accompany the fight.
Spotify CEO Daniel Ek has milked the private market for funding, making himself a multibillionaire in the process. And as another avenue of capital raising, he might as well go to the public to fund the venture in the future.
Cloud and big data companies have identified the insatiable investor appetite for their services. Crystalizing this sentiment is Salesforce's (CRM) recent purchase of MuleSoft - integration software that connects apps, data, and devices - for 18% more than its original offer for $6.5 billion.
The price was so exorbitant, analysts speculated that a price war broke out, but Salesforce paid such a high price because it is convinced that MuleSoft will triple in size by 2021. That is another great trading opportunity missed by you and me.
An 18% premium to the original price will seem like peanuts in five years. The year 2018 is unequivocally a sellers' market from the chips up to the end product and everything in between on the supply chain.
Spotify cannot make money if it's not scaled to 150 million users, compared to its current 76 million. And 200 million and 300 million would give CEO Daniel Ek peace of mind, but it's a hard slog.
Pouring gas on the fire, Spotify is going public at the worst possible time as tech stocks have been the recipient of a regulatory witch hunt pounding the NASDAQ, sending it firmly into correction territory.
Next up was Spotify's day to shine in the sun directly listing its stock.
Existing investors and Spotify employees are free to unload shares all they want, or load up on the first day. In addition, no new shares are being issued. This is unprecedented in the history of new NYSE listings.
Spotify is betting on its brand recognition and massive desire for big data accumulation. It worked big time, with a first day's closing price of $149, verses initial low ball estimates of $49.
Cloud companies are the cream of the big data crop, but Spotify's data hoard will contain every miniscule music preference and detail a human can possibly exhibit for potentially 100 million-plus people.
Spotify's data will become the most valuable music data in the world and for that it is worth paying.
But at what price?
Spotify has no investment bankers, and circumnavigating the hair-raising fees a bank would earn is a bold statement for the entire tech industry.
Sidestepping the traditional process has ruffled some feathers in the financial industry.
The mere fact that Spotify has the gall to execute a direct listing is just the precursor to big banks being phased out of the profitable investment banking sector.
Goldman Sachs (GS) was the lead advisor on Dropbox's (DBX) traditional IPO, and it was a resounding success rocketing 40% a few days after going public.
IPOs are not cheap.
The numbers are a tad misleading because Spotify paid about $40 million in advisory to the big investment banks leading up to the big day.
This is about a $28 million less than when Snapchat (SNAP) went public last year.
Uber and Lyft almost certainly would consider this option if Spotify nails its IPO day.
Banks are being squeezed from all sides as nimble, unregulated tech firms have proved better adaptable in this quickly changing environment.
Spotify's business model is based on spectacular future growth, which may occur.
It is a loss-making company that produces no proprietary solutions but is overlooked for its valuable data.
The company is the market leader in paid subscribers at 76 million, far outpacing Apple Music at 39 million and Pandora at 5.5 million.
Total MAUs (Monthly Active Users) expect to reach more than 200 million users, and paid subscribers could hit the 96 million mark by the end of 2018.
Spotify's business model bets on transforming the free subscribers who use Spotify with ad-supported interfaces into paid subscribers that are ad-free. Converting a small amount would be highly positive.
Gross margin is a number that sheds light on the real efficiencies of the company, and Spotify hopes to hit the 25% gross margin point by the end of 2018.
I am highly skeptical that gross margins can rise that high unless they solve the music royalty problem.
Royalty costs are killer, forcing Spotify to shell out a massive $9.75 billion in music royalties since its inception in 2006.
Spotify is paying too much for its content, but that is the cruel nature of the music industry.
The ideal solution would eventually amount to producing high quality original entertainment content on its proprietary platform akin to Netflix's (NFLX) business model with video content.
Spotify's capital is being drained by royalty fees amounting to 79% of its revenue.
This needs to be stopped. It's a losing strategy.
Considering Google (GOOGL) and Facebook (FB) do not pay for their own content, it frees up capital to pile into the pure technical side of the operations, enhancing their ad platforms luring in new users.
This is why the Mad Hedge Technology Letter sent you an urgent Trade Alert to buy Google yesterday when it was trading at $1,000.
All told, Spotify has managed to lose $2.9 billion since it was created 12 years ago - enough capital to create a new FANG in its own right.
Dropbox was an outstanding success and attaching itself to the parabolic cloud industry is ingenious.
However, potential insane volatility should temper investors' expectations for the first day of trading.
The lack of a road show, no lockup period, and no underwriting or book building will sacrifice stability in the short term.
There is incontestably a place for Spotify, and the expected 30% to 36% growth in 2018 looks attractive.
But then again, I would rather jump into sturdier names such as Lam Research (LRCX), Nvidia (NVDA), and Amazon (AMZN) once markets quiet down.
The private deals that took place before the IPO changed hands were in the range of $99 to $150. Considering the reference point will be set at $132, nabbing Spotify under $100 would be a great deal.
The market will determine the opening price by analyzing the buy and sell orders for the day with the help of Citadel Securities.
It's a risky proposition that 91% of shares are tradable upon the open. Theoretically, all these shares could be sold immediately after the open.
Legging into limit orders below $140 is the only prudent strategy for this gutsy IPO, but better to sit and observe.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"One of the only ways to get out of a tight box is to invent your way out." - Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 2, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(WHY THERE WILL NEVER BE AN ANTITRUST CASE AGAINST AMAZON)
(AMZN), (WMT), (MSFT), (FB), (DBX), (NFLX)
POTUS's Amazon tweet of March 29 has given investors the best entry point into Amazon (AMZN) since the January 2016 sell-off. Since then, the stock has essentially gone up every day.
Entry points have been few and far between as every small pullback has been followed by aggressive buying by big institutional money.
The 200-point nosedive was a function of the White House's dissatisfaction of leaked stories that would find their way into the Washington Post owned by Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, my former colleague and good friend.
Although there are concerns about Amazon's business model, notably its lack of actual profits, there is no impending regulatory action. And, if there is one company that's in hotter water now, it's Facebook (FB), which inadvertently sells every little detail about your personal life to third-party Eastern European hackers.
Amazon's e-commerce business does not violate the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 of "deceptive" or "unfair practices."
The American economy has rapidly evolved thanks to hyper-accelerating technology, and the jobs required to support the modern economy have changed beyond all recognition.
The Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 addressing harmful mergers that destroy competition hasn't been breached either since Amazon has grown organically.
Analyzing the most comprehensive law, the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, which was originally passed to control unions, espouses economic freedom aimed at "preserving free and unfettered competition as the rule of trade."
And, in a way, Amazon could be susceptible, but it would be awfully difficult to persuade the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division and would take a decade.
Amazon's business model will change many times over by the time any antitrust decision can be delivered, or even entertained.
Helping Amazon's case even more is the DOJ interpretation of the three antitrust rules. It is the company's duty to first and foremost protect the consumer and ensure business is operating efficiently, which keeps prices low and quality high. Antitrust laws are, in effect, consumer protection laws.
Amazon's e-commerce segment epitomizes the DOJ's perception of these 100-year-old laws.
The controversial part of Amazon's business model is funneling profits from its Amazon Web Services (AWS) division as a way to offer the lowest prices in America for its e-commerce products.
This strategy has the same effect as dumping since it is selling products for a loss, but it is not officially dumping.
POTUS has usually delivered more bark than bite. The steel and aluminum tariffs went from no exceptions to exceptions galore in less than a week. Policies and employees change in a blink of an eye in the White House.
The backlash is a case of the White House not being a huge admirer of Amazon, but individual government workers probably have Amazon boxes stacked to the heavens on their doorsteps.
It is true that Amazon has negatively affected retail business. It is doing even more damage to traditional shopping malls, which it turns out are owned by close friends of the president. The mom-and-pop stores have disappeared long ago. But Amazon could argue this trend is occurring with or without Amazon.
In addition, Walmart (WMT) was the original retail killer, and it currently is morphing into another Amazon by investing aggressively into its e-commerce division. Does the White House go after (WMT) next?
Unlikely.
Amazon didn't create e-commerce.
Amazon also didn't create the Internet.
Amazon also does pay state and local taxes, some $970 million worth last year.
Technology has been a growth play for years.
Investors and venture capitalists are willing to fork over their hard-earned cash for the chance to own the next Google (GOOGL) or Apple (AAPL).
Many investors do lose money searching for the next unicorn. A good portion of these unicorns lose boatloads of money, too.
Spotify, slated to go public soon, is a huge loss-maker and investors will pay up anyway.
Investors went gaga for Dropbox (DBX), already up 40% from its IPO, and it lost $112 million in 2017.
The risk-appetite is hearty for these burgeoning tech companies if they can scale appropriately.
Should investors be prosecuted for gambling on these cash-losing businesses?
Definitely not. Caveat emptor. Buyer beware.
It is true that Amazon pumps an extraordinary percentage of revenues back into product development and enhancement.
But that is exactly what makes Amazon great. It not only is focused on making money but also on making a terrific product.
The bulk of its enhancement is allocated in warehouse and data center expansion. Splurging on more original entertainment content is another segment warranting heavy investment, too, a la Netflix (NFLX). Did you spot Jeff Bezos at the last Oscar ceremony?
Contrary to popular belief, Amazon is in the black.
It has posted gains for 11 straight quarters and expects a 12th straight profitable quarter for Q1 2018.
The one highly negative aspect is profit margins. It is absolutely slaughtered under the current existing model.
However, investors continually ignore the damage-to-profit margins and have a laser-like focus on the AWS cloud revenue.
Amazon's AWS segment could be a company in itself. Cloud revenue last quarter was $5.11 billion, which handily beat estimates at $4.97 billion.
Amazon's cloud revenue is five times bigger than Dropbox's.
The biggest threat to Amazon is not the administration, but Microsoft (MSFT), which announced amazing cloud revenue numbers up 98% QOQ, and has grown into the second-largest cloud player.
(MSFT) is equipped with its array of mainstay software programs and other hybrid cloud solutions that lure in new enterprise business.
(MSFT) has the chance to break Amazon's stranglehold if it can outmuscle its cloud segment. However, any degradation to Amazon's business model will not kill off AWS, considering Amazon also is heavily investing in its cloud segment, too.
Lost in the tweet frenzy is this behemoth cloud war fighting for storage of data that is somewhat lost in all the political noise.
This is truly the year of the cloud, and dismantling Amazon is only possible by blowing up its AWS segment. The more likely scenario is that AWS and MSFT Azure continue their nonstop growth trajectory for the benefit of shareholders.
Antitrust won't affect Amazon, and after every dip investors should pile into the best two cloud plays - Amazon and Microsoft.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
Having been in this market for yonks, ages, and even a coon?s age, I have seen trading strategies come and go.
First, there was the nifty fifty during the 1960?s. Junk bonds had their day in the sun. Then portfolio insurance was all the rage.
Oops!
While the dollar was weak, international diversification was the flavor of the day. After foreign stocks turned bitter, the IPO mania and the Dotcom bubble of the nineties followed.
Macro trading dominated the new Millennium until the high frequency traders took over.
What is the cutting edge management strategy today?
According to my friend, Anthony Scaramucci, of Skybridge Capital, activist shareholder trading now has the unfair advantage.
Anthony, known as the ?Mooch? to his friends, is so convinced of the merit of this bold, in-your-face approach that he has devoted nearly 40% of his assets to this aggressive posture.
That is no accident.
Have you ever heard the term ?unintended consequences?? Scaramucci argues that The Financial Stability Act of 2010, otherwise known as Dodd-Frank produced that effect with a turbocharger.
The Act brought in a raft of new shareholder rights intended to help Mom & Pop. But activist investors have, so far, been the prime beneficiaries of the reform, using the new regulations to shake down companies for quick profits.
Historic low interest rates are allowing them to leverage up at minimal cost, increasing their firepower.
These include known sharks (once spurned as ?green mailers?) like my former neighbor, Carl Icahn, and his younger, more agile competitor, Bill Ackman.
They can simply buy a small number of shares in a target company and demand a management change, share buy backs, the spinning off of assets, several seats on the board, and even making allegations of criminal activity, which are often unfounded.
A message from Icahn on the voicemail is not something management is eager to hear.
He even shook down Apple (AAPL) last year, with great success, harvesting a near double on the trade.
This is why names like Herbalife (HLF), Netflix (NFLX), and JC Penny?s (JCP) are constantly bombarding the airwaves.
The net result of this is that savvy activist shareholders have effectively replaced the traditional ?buy and hold? strategy as a way to add alpha, or outperformance.
This has enabled activist oriented hedge funds to beat the pants off of traditional macro hedge funds because many historical cross asset relationships they follow have broken down.
Tell me about it!
Suddenly, the world no longer makes sense to them and has apparently gone mad, at the investors? expense. Long/short equity managers, which comprise 43% of the funds out there, are also underperforming for the sixth consecutive year.
The activist managers themselves justify their often harsh actions by arguing that individual shareholders can ride to riches on their coattails. Shaking up management can result in better-run companies, even if it is at the point of a gun.
Activism accelerates evolution, breaks up clubby boards of insiders, and enhances the bottom line. Corporations can be forced to retool and restructure.
How does the individual investor get involved in the new wave of activist investors? The short answer is that they don?t. There are few, if any, such exchange traded funds (ETFs) in existence.
Doing the quantitative screens to generate short lists of potential activist targets, and then listening to the jungle telegraph regarding who is coming into play, are well beyond the resources of your average Joe.
You can try to give your money to the best activist managers. But they are either closed to new investors, or have very high minimum initial investments, often in the $1-$10 million range.
If you are lucky enough to get your dosh in, you will find the talent very expensive. Activist funds are one of the last redoubts of the old 2%/20% management fee and performance bonus structure. And ?hockey stick? bonus schedules are not unheard of.
When I ran my old hedge fund, we made 40% a year like clockwork. I took the first 10%, the limited partners the remaining 30% and they were thrilled to get it.
And you wonder why the small guys feel the market is rigged.
The activist trend won?t last forever. Interest rates will inevitably rise, making the strategy expensive to finance. If the stock market keeps rising, as I expect, then cheap targets will become as scarce as hen?s teeth.
Eventually, gobs of money will pour into the strategy, compressing returns as the Johnny-come-latelys pile in. In the end, trading around activist shareholders will get tossed into the dustbin of history, along with all the other investment fads.
Checking in With the ?Mooch?
It?s fall again, when my most loyal readers are to be found taking transcontinental railroad journeys, crossing the Atlantic in an a first class suite on the Queen Mary 2, or getting the early jump on the Caribbean beaches.
What better time to spend your trading profits than after all the kids have gone back to school, and the summer vacation destination crush has subsided.
It?s an empty nester?s paradise.
Trading in the stock market is reflecting as much, with increasingly narrowing its range since the August 24 flash crash, and trading volumes are subsiding.
Is it really September already?
It?s as if through some weird, Rod Serling type time flip, August became September, and September morphed into August. That?s why we got a rip roaring August followed by a sleepy, boring September.
Welcome to the misplaced summer market.
I say all this, because the longer the market moves sideways, the more investors get nervous and start bailing on their best performing stocks.
The perma bears are always out there in force (it sells more newsletters), and with the memories of the 2008 crash still fresh and painful, the fears of a sudden market meltdown are constant and ever present.
In fact, nothing could be further from the truth.
What we are seeing unfold here is not the PRICE correction that people are used to, but a TIME correction, where the averages move sideways for a while, in this case, some five months.
Eventually, the the moving averages catch up, and it is off to the races once again.
The reality is that there is a far greater risk of an impending market melt up than a melt down. But to understand why, we must delve further into history, and then the fundamentals.
For a start, most investors have not believed in this bull market for a nanosecond from the very beginning. They have been pouring their new cash into the bond market instead.
Now that bonds have given up a third of 2015?s gains in just a few weeks, the fear of God is in them, and dreams of reallocation are dancing in their minds.
Some 95% of active managers are underperforming their benchmark indexes this year, the lowest level since 1997, compared to only 76% in a normal year.
Therefore, this stock market has ?CHASE? written all over it.
Too many managers have only three months left to make their years, lest they spend 2016 driving a taxi for Uber and handing out free bottles of water. The rest of 2015 will be one giant ?beta? (outperformance) chase.
You can?t blame these guys for being scared. My late mentor, Morgan Stanley?s Barton Biggs, taught me that bull markets climb a never-ending wall of worry. And what a wall it has been.
Worry has certainly been in abundance this year, what with China collapsing, ISIL on the loose, Syria exploding, Iraq falling to pieces, the contentious presidential elections looming, oil in free fall, , the worst summer drought in decades, flaccid economic growth, and even a rampaging Donald Trump.
We also have to be concerned that my friend, Fed governor Janet Yellen, is going to unsheathe a giant sword and start hacking away at bond prices, as she has already done with quantitative easing (I?ve been watching Game of Thrones too much).
This will raise interest rates sooner, and by more.
Let me give you a little personal insight here into the thinking of Janet Yellen. It?s all about the jobs. Any hints about rate rises have been head fakes, especially when they come from a small, anti QE Fed minority.
When in doubt, Janet is all about easy money, until proven otherwise. Until then, think lower rates for longer, especially on the heels of a disappointing 173,000 August nonfarm payroll.
So I think we have a nice set up here going into Q4. It could be a Q4 2013 lite--a gain of 5%-10% in a cloud of dust.
The sector leaders will be the usual suspects, big technology names, health care, biotech (IBB), and energy (COP), (OXY). Banks (BAC), (JPM), (KBE) will get a steroid shot from rising interest rates, no matter how gradual.
To add some spice to your portfolio (perhaps at the cost of some sleepless nights), you can dally in some big momentum names, like Tesla (TSLA), Netflix (NFLX), Lennar Husing (LEN), and Facebook (FB).
You Mean it?s September Already?
Mad Day Trader, Jim Parker, thinks that the next three to six months will be a tough time for the financial markets. They won?t crash, but won?t break out to new highs either.
Instead, they will stay confined to technically driven, narrow, low volume ranges that will cause traders to tear their hair out. It will be an environment where it will be tough for anyone to make money. The long only crowd will be particularly challenged. Better to take your summer vacation early this year, and make it a long one.
Jim uses a dozen proprietary short-term technical and momentum indicators to generate buy and sell signals, which he has developed over 40 years of trading in the Chicago futures markets. Last year Jim?s Trade Alerts generated returns for followers well into triple digits. He absolutely nailed the performance of every asset class this year in his Q1 Medium Term Outlook (click here for the link at http://madhedgefundradio.com/january-2-2014-mdt-medium-term-outlook-1st-qtr-2014/ . Ignore him at your peril.
Parker has been using NASDAQ (QQQ) as his lead contract for 2014. When it rolled over two weeks ago, it broke momentum across asset classes. Look no further than the biotech area, formerly the hottest in the market. It?s dramatic, sudden reversal, along with the losses seen in other speculative names, like Tesla (TSLA), Netflix (NFLX), and Herbalife (HLF), indicate that the easy money is gone.
The big confirming move for this cautious stance has been in the Treasury bond market (TLT). Its failure to break down has amazed many strategists. Instead of the ten-year bond yield exploding to a 3.05% yield as expected, it ran all the way down to 2.58%. This was the tell that the bull markets days were numbered. Bond prices are now threatening to break to new highs, taking yields to 2.50% or lower.
The other clue to the behavior of this years markets has been the Japanese yen. While the yen was plunging, stocks and other risk assets soared. That came to an abrupt halt on the last trading day of 2013. Notice that since then, the major stock indexes have not been able to hold on to any gains whatsoever.
This is because traders borrow, and then sell the Japanese currency, to fund any new positions. A flat lining yen means that risk taking has ceased, and that?s exactly what we have seen so far in 2014.
It won?t always be this bad. A long period digesting the meteoric gains of the past two and five years could be followed by a bang up fourth quarter, much like we saw in 2013. The key to success will be not to lose all your money before then.
Here is Jim?s Q2 forecast for each major asset class:
Stocks ? The leadership of NASDAQ is dead and buried for now. Don?t go back in until it closes above 3,745 and holds it. The same is true for the S&P 500 (SPX), which must surpass 1,880 to buy.
Bonds ? It?s alright to hold them here (TLT). If we break the years high at $109.60, it could race up to $114. At that point get out, as risk will be high.
Foreign Currencies - $139.50 has got to be the top in the Euro (FXE). As long as the yen (FXY) is comatose, he doesn?t want to touch it. You want to buy the Australia dollar (FXA) on a break above $91.50. Until then, it will remain trapped in an $88.50-$91.50 range.
Commodities ? The fireworks are over for now for oil. We need some digestion of the $15 move from $92 before we can revisit the upside. Hands off, until we break above $101.50. Copper (CU) is at the bottom of an extended range. You would be nuts to go short here, unless of course, we slice through $2.95.
Precious Metals ? Gold (GLD), (GDX) is toast. To see the sell off accelerate when geopolitical risk remains high has to be especially disheartening for the bulls. A retest of the $1,265 low, then $1,180 is in the cards. Unless you went short the barbarous relic the day it peaked last week, avoid.
Agricultural ? Jim called the bottom on this one (DBA), (CORN) at the New Year. Since then, the ags have raced to an intermediate high. The Crimea crisis gave it an added boost. His long side targets for soybeans (SOYB) have all been hit.? Nothing to do here, unless the weather suddenly turns bad.
While the Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader and Global Trading Dispatch focus on investment over a one week to six-month time frame, Mad Day Trader will exploit moneymaking opportunities over a ten minute to three-day window. It is ideally suited for day traders, but can also be used by long-term investors to improve market timing for entry and exit points. During normal trading conditions, you should receive two to five market updates and Trade Alerts a day.
As with our existing service, you will receive ticker symbols, entry and exit points, targets, stop losses, and regular real time updates. At the end of each day, a separate short-term model portfolio will be posted on the website.
Jim is a 40-year veteran of the financial markets and has long made a living as an independent trader in the pits at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. He has worked his way up from a junior floor runner, to advisor to some of the world?s largest hedge funds. We are lucky to have him on our team and gain access to his experience, knowledge, and expertise.
I have been following his alerts for the past five years, and his market timing has become an important part of the ?unfair advantage? that I provide readers.
A trading service with this degree of success and sophistication normally costs $20,000 a year. As a client of The Mad Hedge Fund Trader, you can purchase Mad Day Trader alone for $699 a quarter, or $2,000 a year. Or you can buy it as a package together with Global Trading Dispatch, which we call Mad Hedge Fund Trader PRO, for $4,000 a year, a 20% discount to the full retail price.
To learn more about The Mad Day Trader, please visit my website at http://madhedgefundradio.com/mad-day-trader-service/. To subscribe, please click here.
If you want to get a pro rata upgrade from your existing Newsletter or Global Trading Dispatch subscription to Mad Hedge Fund Trader Pro, which includes Mad Day Trader, just email Nancy in customer support at support@madhedgefundtrader.com.
Ignore Him at Your Peril
Let me give you my thinking here. I am a long-term bull, expecting the S&P 500 to be up 10% or more to over 2,000 by yearend, and possibly 20,000 by 2030. But yearend is a long time off (even though every year seems to go by faster). We have just had a massive 11 point pop in the (SPY) during my two week trip to Australia. So a period of digestion is called for.
My (BAC) $15-$16 bull call spread is now naked long, so a little bit of downside protection is justified. Keep in mind that this is only a partial hedge, not a full one. But the additional potential profit from this SPDR S&P 500 March, 2014 $189-$192 bear put spread does lower the breakeven price of the (BAC) position by a respectable 46 cents.
The present dynamics of the market favor this trade. All of the action is now in speculative, momentum driven names like Tesla (TSLA), Netflix (NFLX), Facebook (FB), Priceline (PCLN), and Yelp (YELP), which are not even in the (SPY) index. The big leadership names, like financials (XLF) and energy (XLE) are pretty much dead in the water. As long as this is the case, don?t expect any big moves in the (SPY).
And with a short dated March 21 expiration, we only have 15 trading days where we need to be right on this.
As a rule of thumb, don?t chase this spread trade if the price has already moved more than 2% by the time you get the Trade Alert. Just put in a limit order and if it gets done, great. If not, wait for the next Trade Alert. There will be plenty of fish in the sea.
The best execution can be had by placing your bid for the entire spread in the middle market and waiting for the trade to come to you. The middle market is the halfway point between the bid and the offered prices that you see on your screen with your online broker.
The difference between the bid and the offer on these deep in-the-money spread trades can be enormous. Don?t execute the legs individually or you will end up losing much of your profit. Keep in mind that these are ballpark prices only. Spread pricing can be very volatile especially on expiration months farther out.
