• support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Member Login
Mad Hedge Fund Trader
  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Luncheons
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Tag Archive for: (NIO)

Mad Hedge Fund Trader

A Speculative EV Name to Consider

Tech Letter

The 700% gain by Tesla (TSLA) in the past 365 days has meant that this is a Tesla world and everyone else is living in it.

Not to mention they produce a magnificent car that everyone wishes they could drive.

Just look at the unusual options activity of last Friday, and the top 10 most voluminous call activity was in TSLA and Chinese electric vehicle (EV) maker NIO.

Heavy call option buying signals that derivative traders believe the underlying stock will go up in the short-term.

EVs have leaped ahead of the cloud as a derivate of the cloud that contains ultra-growth price growth in the underlying stocks.

Fortunes are being made on speculative EV bets as we speak.

The success has spawned lookalikes, charlatans, and copycat imposters that hope to mimic the same type of trajectory and business.

Infinite attempts will be made to make a crack at the Tesla narrative and to join them as the number two or three in a group of one.

One speculative bet that has a distant shot of making headway in the short to medium term is EV manufacturer Fisker (FSR).

Fisker recently made ingenious inroads to Apple’s subcontracting partner, EV Taiwanese manufacturing specialist Foxconn Technology Group.

They agreed to develop a smartphone maker Foxconn’s hoping the manufacturer’s efforts will boost its automotive capabilities at a time when technology companies including its main customer, Apple Inc., are looking to expand in vehicles.

It’s not coincidental that Foxconn’s first try to sort out the teething pains coalesces around an unknown brand like Fisker.

If plans to fortify their skills in this relatively new industry go awry, they’ll just write this one off.

The know-how and knowledge developed on the ground could also reroute Fisker’s prospects and attach it to the back of Apple’s potential 5G car.

A three-way partnership with each entity providing expertise would certainly mean a 10-fold increase in Fisker’s underlying stock or provide the ammo needed to claim itself as number 2 to Tesla.

Of course, the road is windy and long and there is no certainty that Fisker will knock the socks out of this agreement, but the parameters have been initially set for them to do well in the short-term.

The car will be built by Foxconn, targeted at multiple markets including North America, Europe, China, and India, and sold under the Fisker brand.

Production is set to start in the fourth quarter of 2023.

There is outsized risk in producing this car because Foxconn specializes in making smartphones and not cars.

They are new to the auto business and relying on collaboration and innovative manufacturing that will either go well or unravel quickly.

Fisker founder Henrik Fisker has criticized the car industry for being outdated and said, “We still talk about adopting the Toyota manufacturing system,” referring to a production and logistics concept that was developed decades ago.

Fisker plans to design and market the vehicle while Foxconn will supply the skateboard chassis and manage supply chain and assembly.

Provided they can use their smartphone know-how and flip it into car-making mode, however, in reality, it’s a tall order for the Taiwanese giant.

“Outside the box” solutions are needed to compete with Tesla and taking a speculative bet on Fisker also means believing this Foxconn partnership will work.

Shares of Fisker rose 39% on the announcement showing there is a cohort believing the risk is worth a bet because the upside is savory.  

Foxconn will build more than 250,000 vehicles annually for the Fisker partnership and Founder Fisker hatched the plan when he was reading about Apple’s plans for a car. He said he began sketching what he thought a tech company would build if one went into the car business.

“It will be like nothing you’ve seen before,” Fisker said.

With still much development yet to come, Apple will take 5-7 years to launch their car and that’s if they can get their act together while caring for their main iPhone business.

Certainly, many things need to align for Fisker to score a long-term contract designing Apple smart cars, but at least they can claim to be in the same universe as Apple, even if it is a distant planet.

fisker

 

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/fisker-car.png 490 780 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2021-03-08 13:02:012021-03-10 13:49:53A Speculative EV Name to Consider
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

September 18, 2019

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
September 18, 2019
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(WHY YOU SHOULD AVOID CHINESE TECH IPOS LIKE THE PLAGUE)
(TSLA), (BIDU), (NIO)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2019-09-18 01:04:192019-09-17 16:12:43September 18, 2019
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

Why You Should Avoid Chinese Tech IPOs Like the Plague

Tech Letter

Millennials usually stick with the stocks that they know.

That’s all fine until it takes a bite out of their wallet.

Some of these decisions based on the products that represent this generation have been stock market disasters of late.

Sadly, many Millennials were too young to catch the ride up for Tesla.

Many older generations got into the stock at $20, $40 and $100 and rode the elevator up with an ultra low-cost basis.

I can’t say the same for Millennials as many came of age and finally had the money to splurge for shares after the stock had plateaued.

This was a cringe-worthy lesson that just because a company has a great product doesn’t always mean the stock is just as great.

Electric Vehicles (EV) are front and center of the Millennial consciousness and that also meant that many scooped up NIO which is the Chinese version of Tesla.

After peaking at $10 in March, the stock is now trading at $3.

Many Chinese IPOs that go public in New York are of a pump-and-dump mentality as they shower the public with losses.

In fact, many Chinese IPOs only have the goal of going public without the goal of doing much more after that.

NIO has yet to be found out completely, but the Chinese economy is hurting and the Chinese consumer has reigned back the purse strings as times become lean.

As we head into a global slow down, electric car companies that lose boatloads of money will be in the firing line for value revaluations.

In fact, I would urge any reader to steer clear of any Chinese company traded on the public markets because of opaque financials that are intentionally obfuscated.

Baidu is another favorite of the Millennial generation pigeonholed as the “Google search of China.”

That moniker is an impressive catchphrase but it doesn’t do much to rejuvenate the large loss in market share that Baidu has ceded to Alibaba and WeChat platforms.

Baidu has lost its mojo and is bleeding usership and it will be hard to reverse it as Baidu never evolved with the changing trends of Chinese consumers.

Baidu peaked in April 2018, at $250 and is now trading at less than $108 and the slide isn’t over yet as Baidu has no adequate response to the domination of the other Chinese tech behemoths.

Yes, many tech trends have legs and are secular shifts that have major ramifications to the global economy.

But the devil is in the details and peels back the layers to be aware of developments such as CEO of Tesla Elon Musk building an American Gigafactory in Shanghai at the worse time in economic history as a legitimate canary in the coal mine.

As robust as the Chinese consumer has been, the latest contagion of African swine flu that culled a major amount of Chinese pigs has raised the price of pork by over 45%.

Chinese consumers are hyper-aware of these economic developments in the year of the pig.

After a massive ride up in Chinese tech shares and electric car story that took many investors breath away, we are at the beginning of a meaningful revaluation that will change the narrative moving forward.

Timing is everything in this game.

 

 

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2019-09-18 01:02:192020-05-11 13:32:02Why You Should Avoid Chinese Tech IPOs Like the Plague
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

March 7, 2019

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
March 7, 2019
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:

(WILL NIO EAT TESLA’S LUNCH?),
(TSLA), (XPENG), (NIO)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2019-03-07 02:07:482019-07-10 21:44:12March 7, 2019
Mad Hedge Fund Trader

Will NIO Eat Tesla's Lunch

Tech Letter

The death of Tesla.

There is a sudden existential threat for one of the transformational American companies of the century created by Elon Musk.

And you can thank China for it.

If you didn’t know it, there are over 500 electric vehicle (EV) firms in China and the most widely known is NIO Inc.

NIO’s production chain spans just 20% the size of Tesla and has only delivered just a few thousand cars to this point.

Part of the reasoning for Tesla’s Musk to roll out a cheaper version of the Model 3 sedan was in reaction to the potential pipeline of China manufactured EV cars coming online.

The mushrooming of the electric car industry in China could be a death knell for Tesla.

Not only is the company battling stand-alone Chinese companies now for market share, but they will need to overcome the support of the Chinese communist party and the unlimited funds they throw at these types of national initiatives through generous subsidies.

As we speak, the communist party is starting to consolidate the national automotive industry and China’s National Development and Reform Commission will pour resources into the certain firms they believe can become national EV champions.

As it stands, China's sold more than 1 million electric vehicles in 2018 and could sell 2 million EVs by 2020.

And by 2030, China could dominate the global EV market by snatching 50% of the market.

I believe Tesla has absolutely zero future in China because of the explicit fact they are not a Chinese company and at this stage of the game, China and its home-grown tech are comfortable enough to stand behind the quality of their tech no matter how they acquire the secrets.

In fact, NIO Inc. produced an EV car that is above average quality and will improve with each iteration.

Headaches have already started to compile for Tesla as well when 1,171 Model 3 sedans arrived at industrial city Tianjin and were duly blocked with customs unhappy with the sticker labeling.

This nitpicking is a warning sign for things to come and Tesla will be hard-pressed to become what Apple was in China before Chinese consumers stopped buying iPhones. Or it may be just another iteration of the trade war, now a year old.

Don’t forget that US imported automobiles are exposed to high 100% customs duties that were infamously present even before the trade war began.

A Tesla factory in Shanghai is in the works with the $2 billion loan coming from a state-owned Chinese bank which vanishes any in-house knowhow Tesla planned to keep under wraps.

American high-end products will have to take on a bevy of domestic competitors, even some that possess borrowed foreign technology.

Along with the headwinds of battling state subsidies, Tesla will have to grapple with the price points at which Chinese EV companies sell their cars.

NIO’s ES6 is the follow up to the first all-electric SUV called the ES8 and deliveries start in June.

The car will go on sale for 358,000 RMB, or about $51,000, and that’s before government subsidies.

The 70kWh battery pack offers 254 miles of range and mimics Tesla features with an 11.3-inch touchscreen.

And if you thought Tesla could absorb the heavy blow from a $51,000 price point before government subsidies, then there is burgeoning EV firm Xpeng that crashes the price points even further.

The founder of Xpeng, Henry Xia, has conceded publicly that he was deeply influenced by Tesla and admitted his company was open-sourcing their patents.

The Xpeng G3 starts at 227,800 RMB, equivalent to less than $33,000, once again, before any government subsidies.

The product copies Tesla-style touchscreen features on the dashboard and has battery range capabilities of around 230 miles.

And here is the game changer, the effect of government subsidies could crater the price of these two types of Chinese EV cars to less than $9,000 for the consumer.

Game over for Tesla.

I surmise that once these Chinese EV cars cross the threshold of quality that puts the Chinese variant close to 75% as good as Tesla’s version, potential customers will flock to cheaper Chinese EV firms will a deluge of mass orders.

The global EV industry is the next high-tech industry to get hijacked from the Americans by the industrious Chinese who collaborate with state financial power to take down foreign competition.

Tesla, its leader Elon Musk, and every other high-end German car company are facing down a barrel of a gun that will prove to be an existential crisis of epic proportions.

This is all part and parcel of China’s plan to reshape the global export value chain.

China’s response is to crash the price of EV’s and use state support to outlast external competitors.

Equally as important, China has a massive shortage of EV infrastructure posing problems for Tesla cars to charge up outside.

This could be the trick up the sleeve of Beijing, they could easily squeeze Tesla out of the mix by allowing only home-grown EV cars to charge up at public charging stations citing security concerns of American technology.

The effect would be that Tesla owners would only be able to fill up in the confines of their own house which is problematic since most urban Chinese who can afford Teslas live in skyrise apartments without a personal garage.

The Middle Kingdom is also facing an ecological crisis at home and an exaggerated migration to EV cars is the state’s solution to cleaning up the domestic environment.

The long-term vision appears to have no place for Tesla in the Chinese economy – they already have their own Tesla’s and more imitations in the pipeline hoping to crash the price points even further.

Even more frustrating, 2020 or 2021 is the timeline to get Tesla production up and running in Shanghai, but by then, Tesla and Musk might be fighting from a position of weakness.

 

 

XPENG G3 FOR LESS THAN $33,000

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/xpeng.png 522 800 Mad Hedge Fund Trader https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Mad Hedge Fund Trader2019-03-07 02:06:152019-03-07 01:41:52Will NIO Eat Tesla's Lunch
MHFTR

October 1, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
October 1, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(ZINC AIR BATTERIES WILL REVOLUTIONIZE ELECTRIC CARS),
(TSLA), (NIO), (FB), (GOOGL), (NFLX)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-10-01 01:07:002018-09-28 19:56:13October 1, 2018
MHFTR

Zinc Air Batteries Will Revolutionize Electric Cars

Tech Letter

As Panasonic ramps up its battery production at the Tesla Gigafactory 1 in Sparks, Nevada, the demand and business for renewable energy has never been more robust.

And as the world’s population balloons and man-made pollutants roil the natural ecosphere, business needs an answer to these potential apocalyptic bombshells or there will be nowhere clean enough to live.

Energy security and population growth will have a complicated relationship going forward and cannot be ignored for the sake of mankind.

This isn’t me being a tree-hugging, Birkenstock-trotting, save-the-earth, love and peace-type of guy.

This problem is real and whoever discovers the solution could reap untold profits.

The answer has been found - rechargeable zinc air batteries.

Spearheading this massive initiative is South African-born entrepreneur, sports team owner, Los Angeles Times owner, and more importantly the founder, chairman and CEO of NantEnergy Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong.

This El Segundo, California-based company presented an utter game changer to the future of the world and the world’s economy.

NantEnergy debuted a rechargeable battery powered by oxidizing zinc with oxygen from the air for commercial use at the One Planet Summit in New York.

It also has the capability to store energy.

Not only is this technology and product cutting edge, but it has the cost basis to support broad-based scalability and adoption.

Ramkumar Krishnan, chief technology officer of NantEnergy claimed this revolutionary battery can “deliver energy for $100 per kilowatt-hour (kWh).”

Lithium-ion batteries have been the mainstay choice for clean energy or clean enough energy since 1992, and its usage varies in cost from $300 to $500 kWh.

Tesla, with its phalanx of superior engineers, has been able to suppress that cost all the way down to a level between $100 to $200 kWh level.

NantEnergy has already registered more than100 related patents in its name and envisions a $50 billion addressable market.

I believe the addressable market is substantially bigger.

For all the hoopla about lithium-ion batteries, there are severe drawbacks in its usage and application.

Let’s concisely run down the pitfalls of batteries of this ilk.

Once out the factory door, the performance starts to go downhill.

Lithium-ion batteries react poorly to high temperatures.

These batteries become inoperable if completely discharged.

There is a slight chance a battery could burst into flames and burn off your face.

Simply put, lithium-ion batteries incorporate cobalt, an extremely toxic material hazardous to human health.

If a Samsung Galaxy smartphone explodes, cover your mouth to avoid inhaling the cobalt-laced fumes.

Dr. Soon-Shiong characterized this new technology as the “holy grail” of renewable energy.

Wide-scale adoption would bring the need for cobalt to its knees.

No longer would tech companies need to scramble to secure a sufficient amount of cobalt supply from the deepest reaches of the Congo jungle.

It would be the end of cobalt as we know it.

At first, lithium would be required for a stopgap measure while engineers refine the battery on its way to a full-fledged zinc alone battery.

The lithium placeholder would only be temporary.

The clean energy movement must be grinning widely as the potential to finally do away with cobalt from renewable energy has pronounced social and economic consequences.

An estimated 1.4 billion people still live in the dark and do not have access to electricity.

This technology is being tested in villages in Africa and desolate communities in Asia as we speak.

The absence of electricity isolates these undeveloped communities in third-world Africa and Asia without access to health care, education, and technology.

It’s hard to kick-start your life as a sprouting little kid when you’re lost in the dark half the time.

Importing fossil fuel to put these communities online is unfeasible and just plain too expensive for communities that have a dire shortage of capital.

Currently, NantEnergy’s rechargeable zinc air batteries are online in 110 villages located in nine Asian and African countries.

The batteries have been combined to establish a microgrid system powering entire areas.

The company will start delivery this product next year widening its type of use to telecommunications towers.

The next step after that would be the home energy storage market targeting California and New York as the first American cities.

Engineers have pointed out that this development could transform the electric grid into a “round-the-clock carbon-free system.”

In addition, with cooperation with Duke Energy, a major utility, NantEnergy’s batteries have been powering communications towers in America for the past six years.

The design is mind-boggling utilitarian - plastic, a circuit board, and zinc oxide wrapped up in a briefcase-size shell.

One charge can offer 72 hours of battery life.

The charging process is easy - electricity from solar installations is stored by converting zinc oxide to zinc and oxygen.

The discharge process is straightforward, too - the system produces energy by oxidizing the zinc with air.

The pursuit of energy reduction is in full throttle, and this is the next leg up for energy aficionados.

Your lithium-ion-run Tesla could become a legacy company in a matter of years if this technology disrupts Elon Musk’s brainchild.

Lately, Musk has been falling behind the eight ball with fresh innovators hot on his heels.

This is the latest company to enter into its market even though still in the incubation stage.

Competitors have popped out of nowhere and are coming for his bacon.

Shanghai headquartered electric car manufacturer Nio (NIO) went public and raised more than $2 billion.

Even though it is not yet a threat to Tesla, it shows that Tesla isn’t the only game in town anymore.

In any case, NantEnergy has the magic to unlock the “holy grail” of renewable energy. And if it can promise on its cost projections, I see no reason why this won’t be furiously adopted by corporations worldwide.

As it is, America has been losing out in the Congo, as China has cornered the cobalt market there.

And, as the evolution of fracking technology quelled the Middle-East situation, it could also have the same effect in the Congo.

More excitingly, it could put online an additional 1.2 billion new customers to devour iPhones and watch Netflix (NFLX).

Companies such as Facebook (FB) and Alphabet (GOOGL) have been developing a way for these remote and poverty-prone places to use Internet from a satellite.

They would need electricity first to power their devices unless Mark Zuckerberg has found a way to use a smartphone without electricity.

NantEnergy’s renewable batteries have already cut the need of 1 million lithium-ion batteries, and warded off the need to release 50,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide since 2012.

California is the flag-bearer in renewable energy policy by forcing its populace to be at 100% carbon-free electricity by 2045.

Musk is on record by saying he expects to break the 100-kWh level, which would contribute to better power storage and expedited electric vehicle (EV) adoption.

In contrast, energy storage analyst Mitalee Gupta at GTM Research has retorted that he’s “unsure $100/kWh is achievable this year.”

Musk, being a naturally optimistic entrepreneur, sets targets then does everything he can to break them.

Either way, two South African born visionaries are doing their part to crater the cost per kWh in the renewable energy market, and Elon Musk might not be the biggest disruptor from South Africa.

Time will tell if this market will become zinc-based or lithium-based – the higher-grade technology eventually wins out spelling doom for Musk.

But it appears that Musk has other things to worry about now.

NantEnergy plans to inaugurate a battery manufacturing facility in California next year.

As for Tesla, buy the car and not the stock.

And for Nio, don’t buy the car or the stock.

 

Disrupting the Disrupter

 

 

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Disrupting-image-1.jpg 412 296 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-10-01 01:06:542018-09-28 19:52:46Zinc Air Batteries Will Revolutionize Electric Cars
Page 2 of 212

tastytrade, Inc. (“tastytrade”) has entered into a Marketing Agreement with Mad Hedge Fund Trader (“Marketing Agent”) whereby tastytrade pays compensation to Marketing Agent to recommend tastytrade’s brokerage services. The existence of this Marketing Agreement should not be deemed as an endorsement or recommendation of Marketing Agent by tastytrade and/or any of its affiliated companies. Neither tastytrade nor any of its affiliated companies is responsible for the privacy practices of Marketing Agent or this website. tastytrade does not warrant the accuracy or content of the products or services offered by Marketing Agent or this website. Marketing Agent is independent and is not an affiliate of tastytrade. 

Legal Disclaimer

There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.

Copyright © 2025. Mad Hedge Fund Trader. All Rights Reserved. support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • FAQ
Scroll to top