“The AI technology will keep you out of harm's way. That is why we believe in an AI car that drives for you.” – Said CEO of Nvidia Jensen Huang
Lordstown Motors Inc. (RIDE), an EV startup that recently went public, lacks the money to build a debut pickup truck and might go out of business if funding dries up in the next 12 months.
That’s what you get if you go for the “cheap” tech that offers some pipedream of fantasy managed by charlatans.
The company believes that its current level of cash and cash equivalents are not sufficient to complete the development of its electric vehicles and launch the Endurance pickup.
Investors should have seen this coming from a million miles away.
Lordstown went public through a SPAC and numerous have gone through upheaval as analysts critique their business practices.
Some, like Nikola Corp. (NKLA) and Velodyne Lidar Inc. (VLDR), have had their founders ousted.
Lordstown now has balance sheet problems.
In the filing, Lordstown said it has approximately $587 million in cash and an accumulated deficit of $259.7 million as of March 31, after reporting a first-quarter net loss of $125.2 million.
Going public gifted RIDE $675 million, but the company has burned through that quickly.
Let’s run down the list of red flags I have seen pop up at this supposed EV producer.
The company has no revenue and no sellable product, and they have most likely misled investors on both its demand and production capabilities.
The company has consistently pointed to its book of 100,000 pre-orders as proof of insatiable demand for its proposed EV truck.
Lordstown recently announced a 14,000-truck deal from E Squared Energy, supposedly representing $735 million in sales.
But E Squared is based out of a small residential apartment in Texas that doesn’t operate a vehicle fleet.
Another 1,000-truck, $52.5 million order comes from a 2-person startup that operates out of a Regus virtual office with a mailing address at a UPS Store.
Lordstown has thrived off the notion that the faster the pre-orders arrive, the greater investors’ confidence would be in the company and the faster funds would flow in and subsequently lift shares for long enough that management can cash out.
What management has failed to tell us is that these pre-orders are non-binding letters of intent, require $0 as a reservation payment, do not require an actual purchase.
Do I have other gripes about the company?
Yes.
Despite claims that battery packs would be manufactured in-house, the product is definitely not.
Former employees revealed that the company has completed none of its needed testing or validation, including cold-weather testing, durability testing, and Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) testing required by the NHTSA.
Lordstown only went public in October 2020, but in that brief time, executives and directors have unloaded around $28 million in stock.
It seems awfully plausible that management is unloading stock because they think the company will ultimately fail and the stock will go to 0.
The pre-orders representing over $5 billion in future revenue couldn’t be further from the truth.
So basically this is an EV company out of the mold of Nikola that has no product but tout some marketing gimmicks as empirical evidence that should nudge investors to believe they are on the brink of full-out mass production.
It’s possible no company has ever done just on the basis of hyping up their non-binding, zero dollars down pre-orders and RIDE is still living off of these fumes.
Ultimately, the company isn’t even close to producing a car and any capital thrown at it is dead money that will disappear into a black hole.
It’s plausible that this is a sign of froth when marginal tech firms like RIDE can pull off their act for this long.
It almost makes sense as the market-altering retail army funnels capital to spin into meme trades and make a mockery of the real traders who try to treat this seriously let alone value investors.
I doubt that Reddit’s retail army will save RIDE since the word is out of their business practices.
It’s not too far-flung to consider that the same mysticism brought to the EV industry by Elon Musk is being deployed nefariously to excite the incremental investor that RIDE is about to strike it rich with the “next Tesla.”
The truth is that there is only one Tesla and there will be only one Tesla because they thread the needle through the hole popularizing the EV when there was no competition.
And now the conglomerates have closed that gap and are chasing after Tesla, meaning it’s impossible that there could even be another Tesla in 2021.
And by competition, I first mean GM, then the tier after that of Toyota, Ford, and European players who allowed Tesla to take the lead.
I would say that any reader mustn’t believe that charlatans masquerading as the “next Elon Musk” could be just as good as the real thing.
Take these words with a grain of salt.
Capital should not be considered in any of these unless there’s a real product and proof of product success.
And I am not even talking about accelerated earnings reports yet, or consistent outperformance, this is way off of that.
There are some instances where a premium is paid for potential, especially if it will shift the paradigm in the industry, but if it smells like a rat, the rat should prove he isn’t a rat and not vice-versa.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
May 24, 2021
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE MOST UNIQUE SOFTWARE COMPANY TODAY)
(MSTR)
Investors looking to park their cash in an emerging tech stock have to reckon with the earnings’ strength of a company like Apple (AAPL).
Eventually, any artisanal tech company hoping to deliver you a 10 bagger will need to adjust their sights that at some point in their future, they will need to directly compete with an Apple or Amazon (AMZN).
That is what is so scary for the little guys.
There were bountiful eye-popping numbers serving as ironclad proof to investors that sticking with the Goliaths is the sure-fire approach to grind your way up to more wealth.
A tech company Apple’s size expanding quarterly revenue to almost $90 billion last quarter representing a 54% year-over-year growth rate is stuff of legends.
A 54% growth rate is what us analysts give a green light for regardless of the size of the company.
Many analysts like to resort to explaining the upcoming stifling of growth in big tech as the law of large numbers.
Apple has shown they can overcome almost anything.
And this was supposed to be the company in which they have a China issue.
The consensus is that Apple is a brilliant business with an even better operational model.
Three reasons why Apple is firing on all cylinders.
First, Apple’s installed base growth has accelerated and reached an all-time high across each major product category.
Second, the number of both transacting and paid accounts on Apple’s digital content stores reached a new all-time high during the March quarter, with paid accounts increasing double digits in each of our geographic segments.
Lastly, Apple’s paid subscriptions continued to show strong growth.
This trifecta of outperformance was why revenue in the March quarter broke a record of $89.6 billion an increase of over $31 billion or 54% from a year ago.
Management saw strong double digits in each product category, with all-time records for Mac and for services and March quarter records for iPhone and for wearables, home, and accessories.
Products revenue was a March quarter record of $72.7 billion, up 62% over a year ago.
Company gross margin was 42.5%, up 2.7% from last quarter driven by cost savings, a strong product mix and favorable foreign exchange.
iPhone revenues had a March quarter record of $47.9 billion, growing 66% year over year as the iPhone 12 family continued to be in high demand.
With unmatched 5G capability, the best camera system ever in an iPhone, and advanced durability from Ceramic Shield, this family of devices is popular with both upgraders and new customers alike.
In the US, the latest survey of consumers from 451 Research indicates customer satisfaction of over 99% for the iPhone 12 family.
Turning to services. Another all-time revenue record of $16.9 billion with all-time records for the App Store, cloud services, music, video, advertising, and payment services.
Apple’s new service offerings, Apple TV+, Apple Arcade, Apple News+, Apple Card, Apple Fitness+, as well as the Apple One bundle, continue to scale across users, content, and features and are contributing to overall services growth.
It was a quarter of sustained strength for wearables, homes, and accessories, which grew by 25% year over year.
Apple Watch is a global success story, and the category set March quarter records in each geographic segment, thanks to strong performance from both Apple Watch Series 6 and Apple Watch SE.
The Mac broke an all-time revenue record of $9.1 billion, up 70% over last year, and grew very strongly in each geographic segment.
This impressive performance was driven by the customer approval to new Macs powered by the M1 chip.
iPad performance was also outstanding with revenue of $7.8 billion, up 79%.
Where does Apple go from here?
First, hiring warm bodies and lots of them to try to meet all the extra incremental demand the company needs to satisfy in the near future.
Over the next five years, Apple will invest $430 billion, creating 20,000 jobs in the process.
The investments will support American innovation and drive economic benefits in every state, including a new North Carolina campus and job-creating investments in innovative fields like silicon engineering and 5G technology.
After hiring, Apple is laser-focused on shareholder return.
They were able to return nearly $23 billion to shareholders during the March quarter. This included 3.4 billion in dividends and equivalents and $19 billion through open market repurchases of 147 million Apple shares.
Apple’s board has authorized an additional $90 billion for share repurchases. They are also raising their dividend by 7% to $0.22 per share, and continue to plan for annual increases in the dividend going forward.
Lastly, management threw a damp towel on the feeling of success by removing guidance and talking about headwinds.
Management said that coming up, they would not offer specific financial guidance because of “continued uncertainty around the world in the near term.”
They also said that the sequential revenue decline from the March quarter to the June quarter will be greater than in prior years.
Second, supply constraints will have a revenue impact of 3 to $4 billion in the June quarter meaning a lack of chips.
All in all, hard to be happier if you are an Apple long-term holder. This is a no-brainer buy and hold forever. Any substantial dip should be bought.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 16, 2021
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(SHOULD I BUY COINBASE TODAY?)
(COIN), (CRM), (ADBE), (PYPL), (SQ)
“The next major explosion is going to be when genetics and computers come together. I'm talking about an organic computer - about biological substances that can function like a semiconductor.” – Said American writer, futurist, and businessman Alvin Toffler
Many would believe that ad-based music streaming and the free streaming of it would represent a massive windfall in this new work-from-home economy.
And that is exactly what happened when Spotify’s (SPOT) stock rose from $121 on March 1st, 2020 and elevated to $365 just in February 2021.
The close to tripling of SPOT's shares came on the heels of a new annual year-end report by America’s Recording Industry Association showing that overall recorded music revenue increased by roughly 9.2% in 2020 to $12.2 billion.
This overperformance in music streaming was a relatively significant increase compared to 2019’s reported $8.9 billion, but the big takeaway was that two tech companies have seized the bulk of the revenue.
Both Spotify and Apple Music were the two most dominating streaming platforms, raising approximately $7 billion amongst the two, while subscriptions rose from 60.4 million to 75.5 million.
Even more unthinkable, the figures show 83% of the music industry’s revenue came as a result of streaming.
Why did 2020 work out so well for SPOT?
More time at home resulted in more people getting hooked on streaming and turning to SPOTs platform, but it also created disruption in listening habits, consumption hours and the release of new music and podcasts.
The new dynamics of music streaming is cause for belief that subscribers have been pulled forward from the back half of 2020, which could translate into underperformance for subscriber growth in the year ahead.
Long term, the trend lines are healthy as streaming from a shift from linear to on-demand has clearly accelerated and will continue to remain as a massive multi-billion user opportunity.
SPOTs stock has consolidated from highs of $365 and now trade around $270 after investors got scared hearing management’s lukewarm optimism for 2021.
The hesitation culminated when management admitted that the “full-year 2021 plan will have a higher variance than prior years.”
Uncertainty is always killer in tech and SPOTs response is to shift to more aggressive revenue growth where they know pricing power will enable SPOT to increase ARPU.
SPOT is flirting with price increases across a number of markets even if in the world’s largest music market, the company’s $10-a-month subscription cost has remained fixed for years even as Spotify added millions of podcasts and songs to the platform.
Spotify announced at the investor day that it would double the number of countries where its services are available and roll out dozens of new podcast shows from the likes of Barack Obama and Ava DuVernay.
The ultimate problem that SPOT still confronts is if music streaming can be a profitable business and I believe launching SPOT in 85 new territories across Africa, Asia, and Latin America, such as Ghana, Sri Lanka and Pakistan, will deteriorate SPOTs average revenue per user (ARPU).
ARPU has been declining steadily as the company offered promotional discounts and expanded into countries such as India, where it charges subscribers a lower price. ARPU dropped 8% in the fourth quarter from a year ago, to only €4.26.
At a broader level, the overall number of total ears is saving them but the reckoning with profitability problem could turn out to be 2021 which is inherently terrible for the underlying stock.
In the last year alone, SPOT tripled the number of podcasts on their platform, moving from about 700,000 in Q4 2019 to 2.2 million podcasts today.
Investments in originals and exclusives are creating more and more reasons for listeners to choose Spotify, and exclusive programming is already proving to be an essential part of differentiation.
But how long will they be able to burn through cash before they can scale a profit?
Even if we are in the early days of seeing the long-term evolvement of how we can monetize audio on the Internet, tech will have all business models, and that's the future for all media companies that first will have ad-supported subscription and a la carte sort of in the same space of all media companies in the future, and you should definitely expect Spotify to follow that strategy in that pattern.
Even with that tidal wave of secular positivity, Spotify’s management is modeling ARPU to be “roughly flattish” for 2021 and that’s a red flag.
The crop has already been harvested for 2020 because last year was the year that investors gave tech and all corporates a free pass to write off performance with investors only focusing on low rates, liquidity, and the overarching secular trends.
As 2021 plays out, the tech market is grappling with an undermining bond scare along with tough quarterly comparisons to last year.
It won’t be surprising to see tech growth consolidating and absorbing the higher rates and optimistic re-opening expectations.
After this dip, I expect SPOT to reaccelerate its growth contingent on increasing the ARPU that is beginning to become a sensitive spot for the company’s metrics.
“Artists work best alone.” – Said Co-Founder of Apple Steve Wozniak
I was going to hold off on writing about this streaming service, but the shares are up another 15% this morning on a down day and that has forced my hand.
Streaming platforms have done extremely well during the pandemic and it is a no-brainer to put two and two together because consumers stuck at home would obviously mean more streaming consumption.
But what about those streaming services that you have not heard about?
They do exist and now I am here to tell you about one of them.
Enter fuboTV (FUBO).
FuboTV is an American streaming television service that focuses primarily on channels that distribute live sports, including NFL, MLB, NBA, NHL, MLS, and international soccer, plus sports news, network television series, and movies.
Yes, I must admit that fuboTV isn’t the newest company. The company was established in 2015 and some of the hardcore streamers will see this service pop up on their Roku (ROKU) amongst other platforms.
After a more focused migration into live sports television, a key deal to bring Disney’s ESPN to its platform, and a pair of acquisitions to allow sportsbook operations beginning in 2021.
FUBO has potential and is already showing robust growth backed by the kind of subscriber numbers needed to turn an eventual profit.
November’s third-quarter print showed accelerating subscriber growth from 58% to 72% and sales surging from 71% to 80%.
I am quite positive on FUBO’s ability to monetize traffic at much higher rates than its competitors.
That includes streaming hardware darling Roku, which captures less than one-third of FUBOs per user ad revenue.
FUBO had just 545,000 subscribers entering into 2021, but its free-spending audience that totals an average of four hours a day streaming the platform is a bedroom piece of foundation to this upstart company.
It is generating an average $7.50 in monthly ad revenue per user, and that's on top of the $65 monthly fee for the entry-level plan featuring 118 different channels.
The big selling point for fuboTV is that more than three dozen of those networks are dedicated sports channels.
FUBO’s capture of ESPN last summer was a coup, but it also dropped Turner's sports-heavy properties.
It’s true that it is not the perfect service, and is missing some crucial content.
They are also not carrying Sinclair's regional sports channels.
Cord cutters are helping this stock be hard to bet against after joining the services in droves in 2020.
FUBO actually was laser-focused on European soccer at the beginning but understood they needed to branch out to capture other pro sports fans and widen its audience.
Unlike Netflix, advertising is a key component in the company's revenue. It works with top ad-tech companies like The Trade Desk (TTD) and Magnite, and these partnerships are helping it with growth.
In the third quarter, ad revenue grew 153% year over year.
FUBO's ad business is already far ahead of Roku's, perhaps demonstrating the greater monetization potential of live sports and TV compared to on-demand streaming.
FUBO believes it can generate more than $20 in ARPU after paying the third-party vendors it works with.
A net loss of $402.5 million through the first nine months of 2020 is standard for most teething growth companies and the unprofitability shouldn’t stop investors from this stock.
If you do choose to dip your toe into this stock, then be aware the volatility might make you feel unsteady at night.
The wild swings are a sign of an immature company growing into its investor base.
“We are the first species capable of self-annihilation.” – Said CEO of Tesla Elon Musk
