Mad Hedge Technology Letter
June 26, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE CHIP DILEMMA)
(MU), (NFLX), (AMZN), (NVDA), (AMD), (RHT)
The hawks are circling around 2019 chip guidance and that is bad news for chip equities.
Perusing through recent earnings reports, it's not a surprise that investors are uncertain whether tech can bail the rest of the equity market out of this slow macro malaise.
The deterioration in the macro climate has given added dependence to the tech vanguard with investors piling into large cap tech as a flight to quality ensues.
It helps when the tech sector is at the heart of every and any future business.
Names such as Amazon (AMZN) and Netflix (NFLX) are so far above their 50-day and 100-day moving averages that investors will take this mild sell-off as a healthy sign of consolidation.
This also means that traders will pin down Netflix's and Amazon's 50-day and 100-day moving averages as the line in the sand for technical support.
The equity weakness underscores that not all tech names are created equal, and firms without moats have been the leakiest.
Red Hat, the up-and-coming enterprise cloud company, became the scapegoat for mid-cap cloud companies triggering a massive sell-off dipping 14.23% instigated by weak guidance.
It was one of the first cloud snafus for a few quarters fueling an intense risk off surge in cloud and chip names.
It seems not a day goes by where the administration does not announce another provocative countermeasure to the tit-for-tat trade skirmish being played out at the highest levels of government.
Analysts have been trigger-happy as the few bears out there are incentivized to be the first one to call the peak of the chip market.
Careers are made and lost with these bold calls.
As bad as the Red Hat (RHT) miss was to the tech narrative, Micron (MU) made a big splash on its quarterly earnings report boding well for large cap tech names.
Micron beat estimates and surprised on the upside on guidance.
Micron was the first recommendation of the Mad Hedge Technology Letter at a cheap $41.
To read the first article of the Mad Hedge Fund Technology Letter about Micron, please click here.
The stock rocketed to more than $60 at the end of March and the end of May, each time dragged down by big picture headwinds.
Micron is a great long-term hold and the volatility in the stock is not for everyone.
If you want to avoid mind-numbing volatility, then stay away from chip stocks as the boom-bust nature of this sector has created a paranoia bias among analysts generating stock downgrades.
Cloud stocks are succinct, zeroing in on the few growth metrics that matter.
The guesswork involved in chip stocks is the perfect formula that leads to downgrades, because the silicon is distributed to other companies for end products of which are hard to keep tabs.
Hence, the chips industry has experienced a tidal wave of wrong analysts calls that unfairly taint chip stocks and the price action that follows.
Micron's data center cloud revenue, a huge driver of DRAM chips, were up 33% QOQ.
The cornerstone of Micron's business and the reinvestment into cloud products has made this stock best of breed in the chip sector and a top 3 chip stock of the Mad Hedge Technology Letter.
The only other stocks that compare with this outstanding growth story and that are at the cutting edge of innovation are hands down Nvidia (NVDA) and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) in that order.
Next year's profit margins are the next conundrum for the chip industry.
The huge sums of money required to stay ahead of competition could crush profitability.
Pricing is currently stable but stagnant.
The additional marginal costs could be the reason for investors to flee.
More specifically DRAM pricing for 2019 is under the microscope and soft numbers could spell doom for a company that extracts 71% of its revenue from DRAM chips.
All these negative whispers come at a time where DRAM chips are lifting Micron shares to the heavens. And if there was no international friction, the share price would be substantially higher than it is today.
As of today, the chip industry is still grappling with DRAM supply shortages causing costs per unit to spike.
When you consider that DRAM demand is so healthy that China is once again investigating large cap chip companies, investors should be jumping for joy.
These probes are unfounded and are brought about because DRAM pricing is one of the main inputs to setting up data centers and self-driving technology among other businesses.
If China is forced to pay exorbitant prices for groundbreaking chips that can only be found at American and Korean companies, it makes producing every digital end product costlier. infuriating Chinese management.
SK Hynix, Samsung, and Micron comprise more than 90% of the DRAM market, to which Chinese companies need unfettered access.
DRAM chips, unlike other hardware components, are traded on a transparent public market and the probe highlights the building anxiety if Chinese companies are priced out of this sector.
China views the price spike phenomenon in chips as entirely favoring foreign companies that lap up the DRAM profits like money falling from the sky.
Micron carves out half its sales from China, but it is untouchable because loads of chips are required to fuel its global technological supremacy initiative, which is being chipped at by the administration.
CEO of Micron Sanjay Mehrotra has continued to brush off the China threat because he knows Chinese firms cannot fabricate its products.
If this ever happened, kiss the preferential DRAM pricing goodbye, because China would flood the market with substitutes, which has happened to various end markets in the digital and non-digital ecosphere.
The investigation could end in some sort of monetary slap on the wrist and could be payback for blasting a massive hole in Chinese telecommunications hardware conglomerate ZTE's business model.
The administration's heavy-handed response to ban Chinese investment in technology is a long-term victory for Micron, SK Hynix, and Samsung, which have the DRAM market cornered.
These three companies will corner the market even more going forward thanks to help from Washington, widening each moat.
China is not short on funds; it is short on technological expertise because a generation of copy and paste youth cannot compete with the best and brightest minds in Silicon Valley.
Not only can it not compete, it cannot lure the best and brightest to the mainland capitulating local innovation standards.
Its only hope was to pay premium prices for emerging American technology and now that spigot has been turned off.
Technology is in its infancy and is in the early innings of a stunning growth trajectory with a one-way ticket to singularity.
There will be zigs and larger zags on the way. If you thought the Chinese could just ignore Micron and buy from the Koreans, you were wrong.
The relentless demand for DRAM chips is wilder than a British soccer hooligan. Cutting off access to one massive avenue of DRAM chips would be a death knell for any scalable production process that relies on heavy shipments of DRAM chips.
Although markets have been haywire lately, these developments are incredibly bullish, unless China can suddenly produce high-quality chips, which won't be anytime soon.
For the short term, try to pick up the best chip names at yearly lows as tech will not stay suppressed forever.
If you want to scale down the risk, park your funds in the best cloud tech names to weather the storm.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"We've had three big ideas at Amazon that we've stuck with for 18 years, and they're the reason we're successful: Put the customer first. Invent. And be patient," - said founder and CEO of Amazon Jeff Bezos.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
June 25, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(IT'S NOT HEAVEN FOR ALL CLOUD STOCKS)
(ORCL), (MSFT), (AMZN), (CRM), (GOOGL)
The year of the Cloud takes no prisoners.
Cloud stocks have been on a tear resiliently combating the leaky macro environment.
Many of my cloud recommendations have been outright winners such as Salesforce (CRM).
However, there are some unfortunate losers I must dredge up for the masses.
Oracle (ORCL) announced quarterly earnings and it was a real head-scratcher.
I have been banging on the table to ditch this legacy tech company since the inception of the Mad Hedge Technology Letter.
It was the April 10, 2018 tech letter where I prodded readers to stay away from this stock like the black plague.
At the time, the stock was trading at $45, click here to revisit the story "Why I'm Passing on Oracle."
The first quarter was disappointing and abysmal guidance of 1% to 3% for annual total revenue topped off a generally underwhelming cloud forecast.
Investors spotlight one part of the business requiring the utmost care and nurturing - its cloud business.
The second quarter was Oracle's chance to revive itself demonstrating to investors it is serious about its cloud direction.
What did management do?
They announced a screeching halt to the reporting of cloud revenue and it would avoid reporting on specific segments going forward.
Undoubtedly, something is wrong behind the scenes.
To withdraw financial transparency is indicative of Oracle's failure to pivot to the cloud and this has been my No. 1 gripe with Oracle.
It is simply getting pummeled by the competition of Amazon (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOGL), and Microsoft (MSFT).
Stuck with an aging legacy business focused on database software, transformation has been elusive.
To erect a giant cloak around its cloud business means that growth is far worse than initially thought to the point where it is better to sweep it under the carpet.
Instead of taking a direct hit on the chin, management decided to wriggle itself out of the accountability of bad cloud numbers.
A glaringly bad cloud business should be the cue for management to kitchen sink the whole quarter and start afresh from a lower base.
The preference to shroud itself with opaqueness is bad management. Period.
Instead of turning over a new leaf, Oracle could be penalized on future earnings reports for the way it reports financials for the simple reason it confuses analysts.
Wars were fought for less.
Bad management runs bad companies. The stock has floundered while other cloud stocks have propelled to new heights - another canary in the coal mine.
Amazon and Netflix are two examples of tech growth stocks that have celebrated all-time highs.
Even rogue ad seller Facebook broke to all-time highs lately.
The champagne is flowing for the top-level tech companies.
As expected, Oracle was punished heavily upon this news with the stock down almost 8% intraday to $42.70, and it sits throttled at $43.60 as I write this.
Diverting attention from the cloud will mire this stock in the malaise it deserves. Shielding its investors from the only numbers that really matter will give analysts a great reason to label this dinosaur stock with sell ratings.
Analysts are usually horrific stock predictors, but they will be able to wash their hands of this beleaguered stock.
Even if the stock goes up, analysts will still be geared toward sell ratings.
Oracle reported a $1.7 billion in total cloud revenue last quarter, a disappointing 9% increase QOQ.
Oracle's cloud revenue is only up 25% YOY.
For an up and coming cloud business, the minimum threshold to please investors is 20% QOQ, and the 9% QOQ expansion will do nothing to get investors excited.
The deceleration of growth is frightening for investors to stomach and Oracle's admission the cloud business is uncompetitive will detract many potential buyers from dipping in at these levels.
In short, Oracle is not growing much. There is no reason to buy this stock.
I always divert subscribers into the most innovative tech stocks because they are most in demand from investors.
Innovative inertia has reverberated through the corridors at its massive complex in Redwood City, California.
A major shake out in product development and business strategy is vital for Oracle clawing back to relevance.
This is the fourth sequential quarter with unhealthy guidance.
Much of the weakness comes from Amazon siphoning business out of Oracle.
Completed surveys suggest the conversion to AWS has one clear loser and that is Oracle.
Cloud vendors are now ramping up their smorgasbord of cloud offerings attracting more business.
The second and third cloud players, Alphabet and Microsoft, have been particularly active in M&A, attempting to make a run at AWS for pole position.
It is most likely that Oracle's capital spending will dip from $2 billion in 2017 to $1.8 billion in 2018.
Considering Salesforce spent $6.5 billion on MuleSoft, a software company integrating applications, an annual $1.8 billion capital expenditure outlay is a pittance and shows that Oracle is functioning at a pitiful scale.
Oracle won't be able to make any noteworthy transactions with such a miniscule budget.
Without enhancing its cloud offerings, Oracle will fall further behind the vanguard exacerbating cloud deceleration.
Oracle pinpointed data center expansion as the targeted cloud segment after which they would chase. Oracle will quadruple two data centers in the next two years.
One of the data centers will be placed in China collaborating with Tencent Holdings Limited to satisfy government rules requiring outsiders partnering with local companies.
Saudi Arabia is locked in for a data center, desperate to attract more tech ingenuity to the kingdom.
Saudi Arabia's iconic state-owned oil giant will form an "Aramco-Google partnership focused on national cloud services and other technology opportunities."
It will be interesting going forward to analyze the stoutness of the data center commentary considering foes such as Alphabet are boosting spending.
Alphabet quarterly spend tripled to $7.56 billion QOQ including the $2.4 billion snag of New York's Chelsea Market skyscraper Google will spin into new offices.
Alphabet has splurged on $30 billion on digital infrastructure alone in the past three years.
That bump up in infrastructure spending is to support the spike in computer power needed for the surging growth across Alphabet's ecosystem.
Apparently, Oracle is not experiencing the same surge.
If investors start to question global growth, investors will migrate into the top-grade names and the marginal names such as Oracle will be taken behind the woodshed and beaten into submission.
Oracle is much more of a sell the rally than buy the dip stock fueled by its growth deceleration challenges.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"If you don't have a mobile strategy, you're in deep turd," - said Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
June 22, 2018
Fiat Lux
SPECIAL STEM CELL ISSUE
Featured Trade:
(THE STEM CELLS IN YOUR INVESTMENT FUTURE)
(CELG), (TMO), (REGN)
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
June 21, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(WHY NETFLIX IS UNSTOPPABLE),
(NFLX), (CAT), (AMZN), (CMCSA), (DIS), (FOX), (TWX), (GM), (WMT), (TGT)
Trade war? What trade war?
Apparently, nobody told Netflix (NFLX) that we are smack dab in a tit-for-tat trade war between two of the greatest economic powers to grace mankind.
No matter rain or shine, Netflix keeps powering on to new highs.
The Mad Hedge Technology Letter first recommended this stock on April 23, 2018, when I published the story "How Netflix Can Double Again," (click here for the link) and at that time, shares were hovering at $334.
Since, then it's off to the races, clocking in at more than $413 as of today, a sweet 19% uptick since my recommendation.
It seems the harder I try, the luckier I get.
What separates the fool's gold from the real yellow bullion are challenging market days like yesterday.
The administration announced a new set of tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese imports.
The day began early on the Shanghai exchange dropping a cringeworthy 3.8%.
The Hong Kong Hang Seng Market didn't fare much better cratering 2.78%.
Investors were waiting for the sky to drop when the minutes counted down to the open in New York and futures were down big premarket.
Just as expected, the Dow Jones Index plummeted on the open, and in a flash the Dow was down 410 points intraday.
The risk off appetite toyed with traders' nerves and American companies with substantial China exposure being rocked the hardest such as Caterpillar (CAT).
After the Dow hit an intraday low, a funny thing happened.
The truth revealed itself and U.S. equities reacted in a way that epitomizes the nine-year bull market.
Tar and feather a stock as much as you want and if the stock keeps going up, it's a keeper.
Not only a keeper, but an undisputable bullish signal to keep you from developing sleep apnea.
In the eye of the storm, Netflix closed the day up a breathtaking 3.73%. The overspill of momentum continued with Netflix up another 2% and change today.
This company is the stuff of legends and reasons to buy them are legion.
As subscriber surveys flow onto analysts' desks, Netflix is the recipient of a cascade of upgrades from sell side analysts scurrying to raise targets.
Analysts cannot raise their targets fast enough as Netflix's price action goes from strength to hyper-strength.
Chip stocks have the opposite problem when surveys, portraying an inaccurate picture of the 30,000-foot view, prod analysts to downgrade the whole sector.
That is why they are analysts, and most financial analysts these days are sacked in the morning because they don't understand the big picture.
Quality always trumps quantity. Period.
Netflix has stockpiled consecutive premium shows from titles such as Stranger Things, The Crown, Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt, and Orange is the New Black.
This is in line with Netflix's policy to spend more on non-sports content than any other competitors in the online streaming space.
In 2017, Netflix ponied up $6.3 billion for content and followed that up in 2018, with a budget of $8 billion to produce original in-house shows.
Netflix hopes to increase the share of original content to 50%, decoupling its reliance on traditional media stalwarts who hate Netflix's guts with a passion.
A good portion of this generous budget will be deployed to make 30 new anime shows and 80 new original films all debuting by the end of 2018.
Amazon's (AMZN) Manchester by the Sea harvested two Oscars for its screenplay and Casey Affleck's performance, foreshadowing the opportunity for Netflix to win awards next time around, potentially boosting its industry profile.
It will only be a matter of time because of the high quality of production.
Netflix's content budget will dwarf traditional media companies by 2019, creating more breathing room against the competitors who have been late to the party and scrambling for scraps.
This is what Disney's futile attempts to take on Netflix, which raised its offer for Fox to $71.3 billion to galvanize its content business.
Disney's (DIS) bid came on the heels of Comcast Corp. (CMCSA) bid for Disney at $65 billion.
The sellers' market has boosted all content assets across the board.
Remember, content is king in this day and age.
In 2017, Time Warner (TWX) and Fox (FOX) spent $8 billion each and Disney slightly lagged with a $7.8 billion spend on non-sports programming.
Netflix will certainly announce a sweetened content outlay of somewhere close to $9.5 billion next year attracting the best and brightest to don the studios of Netflix.
What's the whole point of creating the best content?
It lures in the most eyeballs.
Subscriber growth has been nothing short of spectacular.
Expectations were elevated, and Netflix delivered in spades last quarter adding quarterly total subscribers to the tune of 7.41 million versus the 6.5 million expected by analysts.
Not only a beat, but a blowout of epic proportions.
Inside the numbers, rumors were adrift of Netflix's domestic numbers stagnating.
Consensus was proved wrong again, with domestic subscribers surging to 1.96 million versus the 1.48 million expected.
The cycle replays itself over. Lather, rinse, repeat.
Quality content attracts a wave of new subscribers. Robust subscriber growth fuels more spending, which paves the way for more quality content.
This is Netflix's secret formula to success.
Netflix has executed this strategy systemically to the aghast of traditional media companies that are stuck with legacy businesses dragging them down and making it decisively difficult to compete with the nimble online streaming players.
Turning around a legacy business is tough work because investors expect profits and curse the ends of the earth if companies spend big on new projects removing the prospects of dividend hikes.
Netflix and the tech darlings usually don't make a profit but have a license to spend, spend, and spend some more because investors are on board with a specific narrative prioritizing market share and posting rapid growth.
The cherry on top is the booming secular story happening as we speak in Silicon Valley.
Effectively, all other sectors that are not tech have become legacy sectors thanks in large part to the high degree of innovation and cross-functionality of big cap tech companies.
The future legacy winners are the legacy stocks and sectors reinventing themselves as new tech players such as General Motors (GM), Walmart (WMT), and Target (TGT).
The rest will die a miserably and excruciatingly slow death.
The Game of Thrones M&A battle with the traditional media companies is a cry of desperate search for these dinosaurs.
They were too late to react to the Netflix threat and were punished to full effect.
Halcyon days are upon Netflix, and this company controls its own destiny in the streaming wars and online streaming content industry.
As history shows, nobody executes better than CEO Reed Hastings at Netflix, which is why Netflix maintains its grade as a top 3 stock in the eyes of the Mad Hedge Technology Letter.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"I got the idea for Netflix after my company was acquired. I had a big late fee for Apollo 13. It was six weeks late and I owed the video store $40. I had misplaced the cassette. It was all my fault," - said cofounder and CEO of Netflix Reed Hastings.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
June 20, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(GOOGLE'S GRAND CHINA PLAY),
(BABA), (JD), (GOOGL), (AAPL), (BIDU), (AMZN), (NFLX)
There is light at the end of the tunnel.
A glimmer of hope is better than nothing.
Stolen IP was yesterday's story.
The administration's attempts to stick China with the bill is a waste of time.
The stock market is forward-looking and that is what I focus on when writing the Mad Hedge Technology Letter.
American tech companies want to turn over this bitter page of history and construct a fruitful future.
Ironically, it could be no other than American large tech companies that solves this trade misunderstanding by embracing Chinese tech instead of dragging them through the embers of political chaos.
That is what this groundbreaking partnership between Alphabet (GOOGL) and China's second largest e-commerce company JD.com (JD) is telling us.
If American and Chinese tech agree to fuse together through different M&A activity, strategic partnerships, and engineering projects, slapping penalties on your own interests would be without basis.
Albeit gone are the yesteryears of complete ownership on the other's turf, a medium ground could be found to satisfy both parties.
Alphabet's $550 million investment will give it 27 million shares of JD.com Class A shares equating to a 1% stake in JD.com.
JD.com products will now be hawked on Google Shopping, a platform giving users a chance to compare different price points from various sellers.
JD.com's fresh links with Silicon Valley's original powerhouse is timely because its business-to-consumer retail sales have slightly dipped in form from 27% last year to an underwhelming 25% in the first quarter of 2018.
Alibaba (BABA), the Amazon of China, is the 800-pound gorilla in the room and has a stranglehold on this market, carving out a robust 60% of sales from business to consumer retail.
Chinese companies have never worried about foreign companies seizing market share in China because they know the rigid operating environment mixed with "cultural" barriers will lead to a rapid demise.
Chinese firms are channeling their distress toward local competitors that understand the market as well as they do and number in the 100s in any one industry.
This is also a huge bet on the Chinese consumer who has put the world economy on its back creating the lions' share of global growth for the past 10 years.
Do not bet against China and the Chinese consumer.
Alphabet is taking this sentiment to the bank by integrating part of a premium Chinese tech firm into its own top line performance.
This investment would not happen if Alphabet believed the trade war could turn draconian cannibalizing each other's profit engines.
Alphabet has obviously been reading the tea leaves from the Mad Hedge Technology Letter as I identified China's huge competitive advantage in Southeast Asia and the huge potential for Chinese companies that migrate there.
The pivot toward Southeast Asia was the deal clincher for Alphabet and rightly so.
Alphabet has also invested in opening an A.I. (artificial intelligence) lab in Beijing showing its determination to extract a piece of the pie from China and ensuring their brand power is maintained in the Middle Kingdom.
Google search has been shut down on mainland China since 2010. Therefore, Alphabet needs to find alternative ways to benefit from the Chinese consumer and increase its presence.
The writing on the wall was when Baidu (BIDU) came to the fore with its own Chinese version of Google search.
Opportunities on the mainland have been scarce ever since the appearance of Baidu.
Apple (AAPL) has been the premier role model in China successfully juggling the complexities of the Chinese market. A big part of its staying power is offering local Chinese jobs.
Not just a few jobs, but millions.
As of April 2017, an Apple press release stated, "Apple has created and supported 4.8 million jobs in China" which is almost three times more than in America.
Apple deploys much of its supply chain around the mainland and taking down Apple in a trade war would strip millions of Chinese jobs in one fell swoop.
Not only that, Apple has deeply invested in data centers located in China and opened research centers in Shanghai and Suzhou.
Foxconn, a company responsible for assembling iPhones in mainland China, employs 1.2 million alone.
Alphabet would be smart to follow in the same footsteps, effectively, morphing into a hybrid Chinese company employing locals in droves and allowing millions of Chinese to earn their crust of bread through local factories.
Let me be clear: This would not hurt its business back at home.
It is also wrong to say that China is saturating because the 6.8% annual growth rate in China is a firm vote of confidence for Chinese discretionary spenders.
However, instead of competing head to head under the scrutiny of Chinese regulators, it is much more sensical to copy SoftBank's Masayoshi Son's lead when he invested $25 million in Jack Ma's Alibaba in 1999.
SoftBank's 1999 investment is now valued at more than $30 billion as of the current share price today.
Yahoo later joined the party in 2005, investing $1 billion into Alibaba and that stake is worth many times over.
Instead of fighting through cultural norms and fighting against the throes of an exotic business environment, paying for a stake and leaving its nose out of it has shown to be demonstrably effective.
Partnerships complicate the relationship, but if management can lock down each side's commitment to the very T, collaboration could spur even more innovation benefiting both countries and bottom lines.
China has draconian Internet controls put in place. American tech companies aren't up to snuff with cultural maneuverability to navigate through these shark-infested waters.
Better to pay for a stake and pick up the check after the market close.
Another winner in this deal is tech valuations, which has been the Cinderella story of 2018.
Although American tech companies will probably never be able to own 100% of a Chinese BAT. However, allowing these types of investments to go ahead is certainly bullish for equities.
Tech is still the sector lifting the heavy weight stateside and promoting innovation through collaboration will do a great deal to win the hearts and minds of Chinese people, companies and government.
As much as China hates the stain to its image of this nebulous trade war, it still deeply respects and admires large-cap American tech companies.
Chinese Millennials particularly have a deep love affair with Tesla's Elon Musk. They are captivated by his braggadocio, which they find appealingly exotic and captivatingly un-Chinese.
Through this partnership, JD.com will learn heaps about cutting-edge ad-tech and is guaranteed to apply the know-how to its home user base. In return, Alphabet will get deep insights of how JD.com controls the entire logistical experience and how a Chinese tech behemoth operates its supply chain.
The nuggets of information pocketed will help Alphabet compete more with Amazon back at home.
This is a win-win proposition.
Adding even more cream on top, enhanced brand awareness by joining together with Google could catapult JD.com into the shop window of America's consciousness.
Up until today, JD.com is hardly known about in the West except for specialists that avidly follow technology like the Mad Hedge Technology Letter.
I reiterate my stance of not buying into Chinese tech companies, and readers would be better served buying Microsoft (MSFT), Amazon (AMZN), and Netflix. (NFLX)
It makes no sense to trade stocks mired in the heart of a trade war.
As much as I love Alibaba as a company, it has been trading in a range because of the whipsawing headlines released in the press.
However, I can stand from afar and admire how the Chinese BATs have advanced in such a short amount of time.
If American tech and Chinese tech merge to the point of unrecognizability, consolidation could create a super tech power comprising of mixed Chinese and American interests.
Instead of bickering at each other, other solutions look to be more compelling.
The world's economy needs a healthy Chinese economy and vibrant Chinese consumer.
If the Chinese economy ever fell off a cliff, you can kiss this nine-year equity bull market goodbye, and the Mad Hedge Technology Letter would turn extremely bearish in a blink of an eye.
Therefore, America has a large stake in not alienating the Mandarins to the point of disgust.
I am still bullish on equities, but vigilance is the name of the game for short-term traders.
Package Delivery!
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"My belief is that one plus one equals three. The pie gets larger, working together," Apple CEO Tim Cook said about its operations in mainland China and working with the Chinese Communist government.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
June 19, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(TRAVIS IS BACK!),
(UBER), (RDFN), (Z), (LEN), (CRM), (MSFT), (AAPL)
