Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 5, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(GOOGLE IS FIRING ON ALL CYLINDERS ... BUY THE DIP),
(GOOGL), (FB), (AMZN), (AAPL), (MSFT)
Google (GOOGL) makes bucket loads of money and even makes Facebook's (FB) business model look dwarfish.
Total revenue in 2017 came in at more than $110 billion, up 23% YOY and almost three times larger than Facebook's annual revenue of $40.65 billion in 2017.
It's easy to comprehend why the big keep getting bigger if you understand the basic trajectory of technology companies.
A new report from the search consulting firm Adthena chronicled the flow of ad dollars into digital e-commerce and found that retailers are spending 76.4% of total ad budget on Google shopping ads.
Last year was a record-breaking year for total digital ad revenue, and this year the industry is slated to grow another 20%.
Young people aren't watching television as they used to and are more comfortable using computers, tablets, and smartphones to gorge on their entertainment and work.
By 2020, digital ads will comprise 44.6% of total ad revenue as cord-cutting by consumers accelerates and broadband streaming becomes the norm across all of America and the world.
Mobile is the triumphant victor here as the majority of dollars will migrate to smartphone platforms.
China and America will overwhelmingly make up the bulk of digital ad spend, and Europe will remain a distant third.
Last quarter, Alphabet missed Wall Street expectations on the bottom line failing to reach earnings per share (EPS) targets of $9.98. The $9.70 miss wasn't a total failure but disappointing enough for Alphabet shares to nosedive.
Alphabet has positioned itself perfectly for the future and has many irons in the fire.
Google's ad business remains its go-to segment totaling $27.27 billion in revenue in Q4, a main driver of outperformance.
Cost per click (CPC) decreased slightly less than what analysts expected, but that was the trigger for a quick dip in share prices even though Alphabet beat on the top line.
In total, it is immaterial if Alphabet misses slightly on this metric. And, coincidentally, Alphabet is changing the way it calculates ad fees by switching over to cost per impression (CPI), which charges advertisers for raw viewing of an ad.
This pricing mechanism will create higher margins that slightly suffered last quarter because advertisers now are charged for users not clicking an ad as well.
(CPC) has been eroding for years. Alphabet attributes the slight dip to the widespread migration to mobile and the importance of YouTube ads, which yield lower rates than desktop ads.
Alphabet's "other revenues" segment, including its burgeoning enterprise business, hardware sales, and app store Google Play, posted $4.69 billion in revenue, bringing total Google revenue to $31.91 billion in Q4 2017.
Google search, the premier legacy business in tech, still comprises 85% of total revenue. Crucially, the cash mountain procured aids in capital allocation. Alphabet heavily reinvests back into different parts of the business or M&A.
Certainly, it has laid some eggs such as the Google glasses and its attempt at social media through Google+, which flamed out, too.
Many of these new projects originate from the 20% of work time that is allocated to free-spirited entrepreneurship. This initiative has harvested benefits spawning from Google news and other supplementary projects.
Alphabet's innovative qualities feedback into their core product as well, but management understands it needs to evolve to meet the capricious needs of users.
Google founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page thirst for a fresh injection of vivacity into their business and added several outside valuable pieces that include YouTube, Motorola, and Nest Labs for around $17 billion.
These growth engines will fit nicely under the umbrella of firms that Google has collated.
The cloud segment has become a "billion dollar per quarter business." It is dwarfed by the ad revenue but is still the glue that holds the firm together because of the heavy reliance of big data storage to power its firm.
The cloud is still a small sliver of the business and trails Amazon (AMZN), and Microsoft's (MSFT) cloud businesses, but Google drive cloud platform was "the fastest growing major public cloud provider" in 2017.
Apple (AAPL) has even subcontracted Google to store iPhone data on its Google cloud. I bet you didn't know that.
The cloud will continue to gain momentum for Google. Developing the best search engine in the world makes the company specialists in harvesting data because refining a search engine takes an extraordinary amount of data to fine-tune the user searches to perfection.
There are a few headwinds Alphabet is coping with, predominantly traffic-acquisition costs (TAC) as a percentage of revenue will continue to rise, but the increase in velocity will taper off by mid-2018.
Google's total (TAC), which includes funds it pays to phone manufacturers such as Apple that integrates its services, such as search, hit $6.45 billion, or 24% of Google's advertising revenues.
The rising cost of finding eyeballs will squeeze margins.
Another bogey on the horizon is Amazon's foray into the digital ad sphere. It possesses the quality of data to claw away market share and could damage the comprehensive duopoly that Alphabet enjoys with Facebook.
Large cap tech is competing with each other in almost every critical industry guided by the invisible hand of a massive treasure trove of big data. This is unavoidable.
Alphabet's other gambles such as smart-home hardware maker Nest Labs and health-care company Verily are bets on the future as all big tech firms position themselves to compete in a myriad of emerging industries.
These products aren't expected to harvest profits for years and lost Alphabet a combined $500 million last year.
There are a few companies that are perfectly aligned with the direction of future business and technological development, and Alphabet is one of them.
Whether the autonomous vehicle subsidiary Waymo or its smart-home investment in Nest Labs, Alphabet is diversified into most of the cutting-edge trends moving forward.
If the sushi hits the fan with its up-and-coming segments, Alphabet can always fall back on what it knows best - selling ads.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"We want Google to be the third half of your brain." - said co-founder of Google and president of Alphabet, Sergey Brin.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 4, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(SPOTIFY KILLS IT ON LISTING DAY),
(SPOT), (DBX), (GOOGL), (AAPL), (AMZN), (CRM), (NFLX), (FB)
The banner year for the cloud continues as Dropbox's (DBX) blowout IPO passed with flying colors.
Investors' voracity for anything connecting to big data continues unabated.
Big data shares are now fetching a big premium, and recent negative news has highlighted how important big data is to every business.
Let's face it, Spotify (SPOT) needs capital to reinvest into its platform to achieve the type of scale that deems margins healthy enough to profit, even though it says it doesn't.
Big data architecture takes time to cultivate, but more importantly it costs a huge chunk of money to construct a platform worthy enough to satisfy consumers.
The daunting proposition of competing with the FANGs for users only makes sense if there is a reservoir of funds to accompany the fight.
Spotify CEO Daniel Ek has milked the private market for funding, making himself a multibillionaire in the process. And as another avenue of capital raising, he might as well go to the public to fund the venture in the future.
Cloud and big data companies have identified the insatiable investor appetite for their services. Crystalizing this sentiment is Salesforce's (CRM) recent purchase of MuleSoft - integration software that connects apps, data, and devices - for 18% more than its original offer for $6.5 billion.
The price was so exorbitant, analysts speculated that a price war broke out, but Salesforce paid such a high price because it is convinced that MuleSoft will triple in size by 2021. That is another great trading opportunity missed by you and me.
An 18% premium to the original price will seem like peanuts in five years. The year 2018 is unequivocally a sellers' market from the chips up to the end product and everything in between on the supply chain.
Spotify cannot make money if it's not scaled to 150 million users, compared to its current 76 million. And 200 million and 300 million would give CEO Daniel Ek peace of mind, but it's a hard slog.
Pouring gas on the fire, Spotify is going public at the worst possible time as tech stocks have been the recipient of a regulatory witch hunt pounding the NASDAQ, sending it firmly into correction territory.
Next up was Spotify's day to shine in the sun directly listing its stock.
Existing investors and Spotify employees are free to unload shares all they want, or load up on the first day. In addition, no new shares are being issued. This is unprecedented in the history of new NYSE listings.
Spotify is betting on its brand recognition and massive desire for big data accumulation. It worked big time, with a first day's closing price of $149, verses initial low ball estimates of $49.
Cloud companies are the cream of the big data crop, but Spotify's data hoard will contain every miniscule music preference and detail a human can possibly exhibit for potentially 100 million-plus people.
Spotify's data will become the most valuable music data in the world and for that it is worth paying.
But at what price?
Spotify has no investment bankers, and circumnavigating the hair-raising fees a bank would earn is a bold statement for the entire tech industry.
Sidestepping the traditional process has ruffled some feathers in the financial industry.
The mere fact that Spotify has the gall to execute a direct listing is just the precursor to big banks being phased out of the profitable investment banking sector.
Goldman Sachs (GS) was the lead advisor on Dropbox's (DBX) traditional IPO, and it was a resounding success rocketing 40% a few days after going public.
IPOs are not cheap.
The numbers are a tad misleading because Spotify paid about $40 million in advisory to the big investment banks leading up to the big day.
This is about a $28 million less than when Snapchat (SNAP) went public last year.
Uber and Lyft almost certainly would consider this option if Spotify nails its IPO day.
Banks are being squeezed from all sides as nimble, unregulated tech firms have proved better adaptable in this quickly changing environment.
Spotify's business model is based on spectacular future growth, which may occur.
It is a loss-making company that produces no proprietary solutions but is overlooked for its valuable data.
The company is the market leader in paid subscribers at 76 million, far outpacing Apple Music at 39 million and Pandora at 5.5 million.
Total MAUs (Monthly Active Users) expect to reach more than 200 million users, and paid subscribers could hit the 96 million mark by the end of 2018.
Spotify's business model bets on transforming the free subscribers who use Spotify with ad-supported interfaces into paid subscribers that are ad-free. Converting a small amount would be highly positive.
Gross margin is a number that sheds light on the real efficiencies of the company, and Spotify hopes to hit the 25% gross margin point by the end of 2018.
I am highly skeptical that gross margins can rise that high unless they solve the music royalty problem.
Royalty costs are killer, forcing Spotify to shell out a massive $9.75 billion in music royalties since its inception in 2006.
Spotify is paying too much for its content, but that is the cruel nature of the music industry.
The ideal solution would eventually amount to producing high quality original entertainment content on its proprietary platform akin to Netflix's (NFLX) business model with video content.
Spotify's capital is being drained by royalty fees amounting to 79% of its revenue.
This needs to be stopped. It's a losing strategy.
Considering Google (GOOGL) and Facebook (FB) do not pay for their own content, it frees up capital to pile into the pure technical side of the operations, enhancing their ad platforms luring in new users.
This is why the Mad Hedge Technology Letter sent you an urgent Trade Alert to buy Google yesterday when it was trading at $1,000.
All told, Spotify has managed to lose $2.9 billion since it was created 12 years ago - enough capital to create a new FANG in its own right.
Dropbox was an outstanding success and attaching itself to the parabolic cloud industry is ingenious.
However, potential insane volatility should temper investors' expectations for the first day of trading.
The lack of a road show, no lockup period, and no underwriting or book building will sacrifice stability in the short term.
There is incontestably a place for Spotify, and the expected 30% to 36% growth in 2018 looks attractive.
But then again, I would rather jump into sturdier names such as Lam Research (LRCX), Nvidia (NVDA), and Amazon (AMZN) once markets quiet down.
The private deals that took place before the IPO changed hands were in the range of $99 to $150. Considering the reference point will be set at $132, nabbing Spotify under $100 would be a great deal.
The market will determine the opening price by analyzing the buy and sell orders for the day with the help of Citadel Securities.
It's a risky proposition that 91% of shares are tradable upon the open. Theoretically, all these shares could be sold immediately after the open.
Legging into limit orders below $140 is the only prudent strategy for this gutsy IPO, but better to sit and observe.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"One of the only ways to get out of a tight box is to invent your way out." - Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 3, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE BIG WINNER FROM THE PHOENIX CAR CRASH),
(WAYMO), (TSLA), (GOOGL), (AAPL), (AMZN), (UBER), (GM), (FB)
In 2014, the juicy sound clips recorded by NFL legend Chris Carter at the annual NFL rookie symposium would be enough for those at league headquarters to have nervous breakdowns.
During a keynote speech, Chris Carter recommended that every rookie about to kick-start a sports career should find a "fall guy" just in case they found themselves on the wrong side of the law.
Carter later rescinded his comments and sincerely apologized for insinuating marginal tactics.
Lo and behold, it seems the most attentive listeners at the symposium weren't the players but the swashbuckling chauffeur-share service that has become the "fall guy" of Big Tech, none other than Uber.
The great thing (read: sarcastic here) for Uber about killing a pedestrian with autonomous vehicle technology is that it does not need to change its Silicon Valley mind-set of "move fast and break things."
Everything Uber touches seems to turn to mush. At least lately.
This revelation is extremely bullish for the other big players in the A.I. (Artificial Intelligence) driverless car space, mainly Waymo and General Motors (GM).
Granted, Uber came late to the party, but that cannot be an excuse for the myriad of shortcuts it promotes to build its business.
Waymo, the autonomous subsidiary of Google (GOOGL), has been honing its software, algorithms, and sensors for the past nine years like a sage samurai swordsmith from Kyoto. This type of detailed nurturing has led Waymo to rack up more than 5 million miles of testing on live roads.
The company recently commenced the first niche ride-hailing service in Phoenix, AZ, and just announced that it will purchase up to 20,000 electric cars from Jaguar Land Rover in a $1 billion deal to outfit with its cutting-edge technology.
Every day is a joyous day for Waymo because the first mover advantage is in full effect.
GM, another laggard, though considered in the top three, won't commence its robotic car fleet until late 2019. However, by that time, Waymo could be on the verge of mass rollouts if there are no setbacks.
The cherry on top for Waymo is Uber's knack of making a dog's breakfast of anything it pursues, magnifying an insurmountable lead for Waymo to possess.
Granted, the autonomous vehicle brain trust expected casualties, and the firm that made news for this mishap would be stuck with this label along with suspended operations.
Waymo missed a direct hit thanks to Uber and Tesla.
Tesla also took a direct hit when it announced that Walter Huang, an Apple engineer, sadly was killed in a Model X accident last weekend while his car was on autopilot.
It capped a horrible week by announcing a comprehensive recall of every Model S made before April 2016 for a faulty part. After fighting tooth and nail to maintain the $300 support level, Tesla swiftly sold off down to $250.
The disruption fetish permeating the ranks of the tech industry has its merits. Often the end result manifests through cheaper prices and better consumer services.
However, Uber's over-aggressiveness has placed it at the forefront of the regulation backlash along with Facebook (FB).
Google has certainly been playing its cards right, and having not run over a pedestrian consolidates its leading position
Luckily, the National Transportation Safety Board does not punish every participant using this technology.
No news is good news.
An extensive review of internal processes will hit team morale, and the burden of blame with fall upon the engineers.
The fallout from the tragic incidents will set back Tesla and Uber at least three to six months.
The suspension of their operations is akin to a white flag because Waymo is currently leaps ahead and plans to ramp up the mass rollout in the next two years with technology that is best of breed.
The running joke in the industry is that Uber's autonomous vehicle engineers are comprised of Waymo rejects.
Waymo already has more than 600 for-profit vehicles in operation in Arizona. And as every day without a fatality is considered a success, the Jaguars are next in line to be tricked-out with sensors and software.
Unceremoniously, Waymo has focused on safety as the pillar of its autonomous driving operation. Its conservative attitude toward danger will serve it well in the future. Waymo even spouted that its technology would have avoided the Uber accident.
Waymo has no desire to physically produce cars, but it aspires to sell licenses to the technology that could be installed in trucks and delivery vehicles, too.
The licenses could act as de-facto SaaS (software as a service) reoccurring revenue that has catapulted cloud companies to untold heights.
Google would also be able to integrate Google Maps, Google Docs, and all Google services into the robot-cab experience. The robo-taxi would merely serve as an incubation chamber to use the plethora of Google services while being transported from point A to point B.
And with Uber temporarily wiped off the map, Waymo seems like a great bet to monetize this segment at massive scale.
Google is truly on a roll as of late, even finding the perfect fall guy for the big data leak that has roiled the tech world, inducing a wicked tech sell-off - Facebook.
Instead of extracting data from user-posted content, Google's search builds a profile on users' search tendencies, and it is just as culpable in this ordeal.
Ironically, all the heat is coming down on Facebook's plate, and Mark Zuckerberg's lack of tactical PR noise is cause for investor concern.
The mountains of cash vaulted up over the years has made barriers of entry into new fields simple.
For example, Amazon's desire to lead health care came out of left field, and 10 years ago nobody ever thought the iPod company would make smart watches.
The interesting development in broader tech is the disintegration of unity that once supported the backbone of these firms.
Tim Cook, chief executive officer of Apple, railed on Facebook's business model and trashed Mark Zuckerberg's blatant disregard for privacy in order to profit from people's personal lives.
Large cap tech has never had as much overlap as it does now, and the new normal is throwing others under the bus.
If Google is dragged into the Facebook regulatory orbit, the silver lining is that the world's best autonomous driving technology will soon transform its narrative and put its incredibly profitable search business on the back burner.
Markets are forward looking and reward outstanding growth stories.
Tech is growth.
Morgan Stanley issued a report claiming the repercussions of mass-integrating this technology would be to the tune of about half a trillion dollars. That includes the $18 billion saved in annual health costs to automotive injuries. Also, 42% of police work ignites from a simple traffic stop. This would vanish overnight as well as concrete parking garages that blight cities. Car insurance is another industry that will be swept into the dustbin of ancient history.
Yes, tech has evolved that fast when Google can start claiming its revered search business as the daunted L word - legacy business.
The fog of war is starting to burn off and the visible winner is Waymo.
The shaping of its autonomous vehicle business is starting to take concrete form and although this won't affect earnings in the next few years, it will be a game changer of monumental proportions.
Uber is seriously in the throes of having an existential problem because of Waymo's outperformance. Venture capitalists heavily invested in Uber because of the promises of autonomous vehicle technology.
This is its entire growth story of the future.
Without it, it is a simple taxi company run on an app. There is no competitive advantage.
Waymo is on the verge of creating a scintillating growth business that is effectively Uber without a driver while simultaneously destroying Uber.
Ouch!
It speaks volumes to the ascendancy. And if Waymo miraculously capitulates, Google can always call Chris Carter and find another "fall guy."
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
Asked what he would do if he was Mark Zuckerberg, Apple CEO Tim Cook said, "I wouldn't be in this situation."
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 2, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(WHY THERE WILL NEVER BE AN ANTITRUST CASE AGAINST AMAZON)
(AMZN), (WMT), (MSFT), (FB), (DBX), (NFLX)
POTUS's Amazon tweet of March 29 has given investors the best entry point into Amazon (AMZN) since the January 2016 sell-off. Since then, the stock has essentially gone up every day.
Entry points have been few and far between as every small pullback has been followed by aggressive buying by big institutional money.
The 200-point nosedive was a function of the White House's dissatisfaction of leaked stories that would find their way into the Washington Post owned by Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, my former colleague and good friend.
Although there are concerns about Amazon's business model, notably its lack of actual profits, there is no impending regulatory action. And, if there is one company that's in hotter water now, it's Facebook (FB), which inadvertently sells every little detail about your personal life to third-party Eastern European hackers.
Amazon's e-commerce business does not violate the Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 of "deceptive" or "unfair practices."
The American economy has rapidly evolved thanks to hyper-accelerating technology, and the jobs required to support the modern economy have changed beyond all recognition.
The Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 addressing harmful mergers that destroy competition hasn't been breached either since Amazon has grown organically.
Analyzing the most comprehensive law, the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, which was originally passed to control unions, espouses economic freedom aimed at "preserving free and unfettered competition as the rule of trade."
And, in a way, Amazon could be susceptible, but it would be awfully difficult to persuade the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Antitrust Division and would take a decade.
Amazon's business model will change many times over by the time any antitrust decision can be delivered, or even entertained.
Helping Amazon's case even more is the DOJ interpretation of the three antitrust rules. It is the company's duty to first and foremost protect the consumer and ensure business is operating efficiently, which keeps prices low and quality high. Antitrust laws are, in effect, consumer protection laws.
Amazon's e-commerce segment epitomizes the DOJ's perception of these 100-year-old laws.
The controversial part of Amazon's business model is funneling profits from its Amazon Web Services (AWS) division as a way to offer the lowest prices in America for its e-commerce products.
This strategy has the same effect as dumping since it is selling products for a loss, but it is not officially dumping.
POTUS has usually delivered more bark than bite. The steel and aluminum tariffs went from no exceptions to exceptions galore in less than a week. Policies and employees change in a blink of an eye in the White House.
The backlash is a case of the White House not being a huge admirer of Amazon, but individual government workers probably have Amazon boxes stacked to the heavens on their doorsteps.
It is true that Amazon has negatively affected retail business. It is doing even more damage to traditional shopping malls, which it turns out are owned by close friends of the president. The mom-and-pop stores have disappeared long ago. But Amazon could argue this trend is occurring with or without Amazon.
In addition, Walmart (WMT) was the original retail killer, and it currently is morphing into another Amazon by investing aggressively into its e-commerce division. Does the White House go after (WMT) next?
Unlikely.
Amazon didn't create e-commerce.
Amazon also didn't create the Internet.
Amazon also does pay state and local taxes, some $970 million worth last year.
Technology has been a growth play for years.
Investors and venture capitalists are willing to fork over their hard-earned cash for the chance to own the next Google (GOOGL) or Apple (AAPL).
Many investors do lose money searching for the next unicorn. A good portion of these unicorns lose boatloads of money, too.
Spotify, slated to go public soon, is a huge loss-maker and investors will pay up anyway.
Investors went gaga for Dropbox (DBX), already up 40% from its IPO, and it lost $112 million in 2017.
The risk-appetite is hearty for these burgeoning tech companies if they can scale appropriately.
Should investors be prosecuted for gambling on these cash-losing businesses?
Definitely not. Caveat emptor. Buyer beware.
It is true that Amazon pumps an extraordinary percentage of revenues back into product development and enhancement.
But that is exactly what makes Amazon great. It not only is focused on making money but also on making a terrific product.
The bulk of its enhancement is allocated in warehouse and data center expansion. Splurging on more original entertainment content is another segment warranting heavy investment, too, a la Netflix (NFLX). Did you spot Jeff Bezos at the last Oscar ceremony?
Contrary to popular belief, Amazon is in the black.
It has posted gains for 11 straight quarters and expects a 12th straight profitable quarter for Q1 2018.
The one highly negative aspect is profit margins. It is absolutely slaughtered under the current existing model.
However, investors continually ignore the damage-to-profit margins and have a laser-like focus on the AWS cloud revenue.
Amazon's AWS segment could be a company in itself. Cloud revenue last quarter was $5.11 billion, which handily beat estimates at $4.97 billion.
Amazon's cloud revenue is five times bigger than Dropbox's.
The biggest threat to Amazon is not the administration, but Microsoft (MSFT), which announced amazing cloud revenue numbers up 98% QOQ, and has grown into the second-largest cloud player.
(MSFT) is equipped with its array of mainstay software programs and other hybrid cloud solutions that lure in new enterprise business.
(MSFT) has the chance to break Amazon's stranglehold if it can outmuscle its cloud segment. However, any degradation to Amazon's business model will not kill off AWS, considering Amazon also is heavily investing in its cloud segment, too.
Lost in the tweet frenzy is this behemoth cloud war fighting for storage of data that is somewhat lost in all the political noise.
This is truly the year of the cloud, and dismantling Amazon is only possible by blowing up its AWS segment. The more likely scenario is that AWS and MSFT Azure continue their nonstop growth trajectory for the benefit of shareholders.
Antitrust won't affect Amazon, and after every dip investors should pile into the best two cloud plays - Amazon and Microsoft.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
March 29, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(TECHNOLOGY'S UPSIDE IN THE TRADE WAR)
(RHT), (DBX), (SPOTIFY)
After watching the performance of technology stocks over the past two weeks, you may be on the verge of slitting your wrist, overdosing on drugs, and then jumping off the Golden Gate Bridge.
However, the results reported by tech companies this week say you should be doing otherwise.
As tech companies confront upcoming regulation and an overseas trade war, it has felt like a death by a thousand cuts.
It almost is starting to feel as if being a technology company is akin to drinking from a poisoned chalice.
I beg to differ.
I will tell you why the destiny of tech is quite positive.
The long-term secular growth drivers will prevail of accelerated earnings amid a backdrop of global economic synchronized expansion.
Assiduous capital reallocation programs will attract investors instead of detract from them.
The ironic angle to the precarious diplomatic tumult is that regulation will ultimately benefit the current pacesetters and culprits of technology because the barriers of entry become insurmountable.
The trade war has the same effect as the data regulation because it is ultimately for the betterment and protection of domestic, made-in-USA technology.
Washington knows the FANGs all too well, and the bull market will cease to exist if Beijing buys out our technological expertise.
Short-term pain for long-term gain. That's it in a nutshell.
The White House further understands that it's better to start a trade war now when it holds a stronger hand. No doubt after 20 more years of an ascending China, the Middle Kingdom will leverage its economic clout for diplomatic power dictating the outcome more ruthlessly.
Effectively, Trump's trade fracas is a one step back and two steps forward policy. During the one step back phase simply seems as if the economy is taking a nosedive into the ocean floor.
Love it or hate it, technology is becoming more (and not less) ubiquitous. However, it's gone too far too fast, and society and public officials require time to absorb the new environment or you risk the current backlash.
Simultaneously, America is in the one step back phase of data regulation, trade laws, and society's backlash of encroaching tech.
Bad timing.
The teething problems will gradually subside, the stock market will re-ignite, and tech will advance further into regular life.
The market even has seen some green shoots with the blockbuster Dropbox (DBX) IPO up over 40% intraday on the first day of trading.
In the S-1 filing required for IPOs, (DBX) stated that it may "not be able to achieve or maintain profitability" because of increasing expenses. The disclosure also prefaced its "history of net losses" to justify the business direction.
(DBX) lost $111.7 million in 2017, on revenues of just over $1 billion.
Technology must be doing something right if loss-making firms are treated with a 40% gain on IPO day; and, Spotify, an even bigger money loser, will go public next week.
If investors are smitten with loss-making tech companies, I imagine they feel quite comfortable with the ones earning billions in quarterly profits and growing at a pace where analysts cannot hike their price targets quick enough, making them look foolish.
The outstanding gains by (DBX) was for one reason and one reason only.
It's a pure cloud play, and pure cloud plays have been rewarded in spades.
Red Hat's (RHT) stellar earnings were on the heels of the (DBX) IPO success.
Red Hat is a medium-size unadulterated cloud play that lacks the financial resources of the FANGs but is still turning a profit.
It is the poster boy for enterprise cloud companies flourishing in an unrelenting fierce environment.
If the world is going to hell in a handbasket, then how did Red Hat achieve aggregate billings growth of 25%?
Everyone and their uncle expect tech companies to start floundering, but the opposite is true. They overpromise then over deliver to the upside every quarter.
Red Hat booked the most deals over $1 million in Q4 2017 in its history.
Cross-selling cloud applications was especially strong with 81% of deals over $1 million spending on multiple software services.
The critical subscription revenue comprised 88% of Q4 revenue and is up 15% YOY. Application development-related subscriptions were up 42% YOY, higher than the infrastructure-related subscription revenue growing 17% YOY.
Companies are churning out innovation on top of their existing platforms using various software solutions. And every company in the world is migrating toward cloud software and infrastructure. There has never been a better time to be a pure cloud company.
The most poignant telltale sign was that Red Hat renewed 99 out of 100 of its top deals and disclosed that multiyear deals were healthy.
Ansible, its software for automating data center operations, OpenShift, its software for container-based deployment and management, and OpenStack, an infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) for cloud computing are the underpinnings to Red Hat's supreme business.
The reoccurring revenue salted away is legion.
The FY 2018 guidance was even more impressive than the quarterly earnings report. Red Hat expects a revenue range between $800 million and $810 million, up from the $748 million last quarter and expects quarterly EPS at $0.81, up from $0.70 last quarter.
Toward the end of the earnings call, Red Hat CEO Jim Whitehurst described the cloud growth environment as "very, very, very fast growth."
Market conditions and heightened volatility could stay irrational for longer than expected but leadership stocks are always the last to fall.
If (DBX) can catch a bid, and headway is made on political issues, then jump back into the cloud names that perform like Red Hat and about which I have been beating the drum.
And don't forget that these regulatory and political hindrances all point toward giving big cap tech cozier conditions and an elevated runway from which to operate.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"We know where you are. We know where you've been. We can more or less know what you're thinking about." - said Eric Schmidt in 2010, the former executive chairman of Google from 2001-2017
