March 2018

Market Outlook for the Week Ahead, or Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Steel

We certainly have gotten a crash course on the global steel industry over the past few days.

I, on the other hand already knew the intricacies of this complex industry, as I was the Iron and Steel Correspondent for the Australian Financial Review
during the 1970's. I had to write an original news story about the topic every day for five years!

Suffice to say that I know which end of a one inch steel I-beam to hold upwards.

So let me summarize for you the issue in a few short paragraphs. No research for me today! I can write this entirely out of my own head.

For a start, I saw all this coming someday, which is why I aggressively recommended a long position in US Steel (X) in August at $21. Yesterday, it traded at $48, up 128%, so well done to those who followed my advice!

If you own any other stocks, read on for the bad news.

The United States has not been cost competitive in steel production for 70 years. Since then, there has been a long succession of countries that could produce steel cheaper than we could, thanks to lower labor costs.

Germany and England were first, followed by Japan, South Korea, Canada, and more recently China, India, Russia, and Mexico.

Foreigners had another big advantage in that the US blew up almost the entire world's steel production during WWII, except our own.

That meant the new competitors operated with brand new efficient steel mills, compared to our own ancient plants. Go to a US steel mill today and you are impressed with how antiquated everything is, employing processes that are over 100 years old.

A third factor is that the use of steel in all products has been on a secular long-term decline, as advancing technology permitted large reductions in costs and weight.

A new car today weighs half of what it did in the 1950's. Tesla's don't use steel at all, as they are made entirely of aluminum, carbon fiber, glass, and lithium.

If steel production ramped back up again barely any new jobs would be created. It took ten man-hours to produce a ton of steel in 1980. Today, it is only two. That's an 80% productivity increase. That is why US steel companies exist at all today.

This has left us with seven generations of declining employment in the US steel industry, from 750,000 in 1946 to 140,000 today. This quickly devolved into a hot button political issue for both parties.

Steel has been a trade issue at least since the 1950's, when the US sought to protect a retreating industry with jawboning, quotas, and tariffs. It was always a losing battle.

Punitive tariffs like the 25% duty imposed by the president have not been used as a trade tool for 80 years for good reason. Tit for tat tariffs employed by countries during the 1930's are now widely understood to have greatly extended the Great Depression.

They are also illegal, a violation of rules laid out by the World Trade Organization, and will almost certainly be overturned in future litigation.

Tariffs were also abandoned because they make no sense for the US economy. At most, higher steel prices will create a few hundred jobs.

But they will also raise prices an all steel containing products for 330 million American consumers. That means it is costing millions of dollars to create a single job in the steel industry.

It is also bad for the steel industry over the long term. Higher prices will force them to cede foreign markets and only sell to the domestic market.

In the meantime, the largest users of American steel, the auto industry, has seen the cost of their vehicles rise by a few hundred dollars each.

That erodes their ability to compete with imported cars made with cheaper foreign steel. Notice that the shares of General Motors (GM) got slaughtered, off some 12% in two days.

The stock market got it right with the 1,500-point swoon in the Dow average the tariffs triggered. Steel producing companies saw the value of their companies rise by $2 billion. Steel consumers saw the value of their shares fall by $150 billion. No, the risk/reward doesn't look right to me either.

Foreign steel exporters are certain to retaliate. Target number one will be the US agricultural exports, where it enjoys a major cost advantage of its own.

This is why you heard so much carping from red state congressional representatives. Note that wheat (WEAT) prices, the most internationally traded ag commodity, dove some 4.8% yesterday.

Retaliation could spread to other globally traded US products, such as those in high tech (AAPL), services (JPM), aircraft (BA), and even Coca Cola (K) (see more in the piece below). This is why the steel issue has taken the entire market down, including most sectors.

There is also a national security element to all of this. Some of the largest exporters of steel to the US are military allies, like Japan and South Korea.

Attack some of their most important strategic industries and they will be less likely to assist us in any future military alliance. The steel tariffs could well push them into the China orbit.

This is why National Security Advisor HR McMasters is ready to resign. I hope he writes another book.

And last of all, who is the largest foreign owner of US Treasury bonds? You guessed it! You already know from my "Exploding Deficits" Series that it is China, with $1.2 trillion of American paper, and who have already started boycotting recent bond auctions.

My guess is that trade will remain a growing weight on the stock market. With the tin hat crowd of conspiracy theorists advising an increasingly distracted president, what else could you expect? Watch Rome burn!

Who do we bail out next? The buggy whip makers?

With crash course on the steel industry done, let's look forward to the week ahead.

This coming week will be dominated by raft of new jobs data.

On Monday, March 5 at 10:00 AM EST we kick off the week with the February ISM Non-manufacturing Index

On Tuesday, March 6 at 10:00 AM we learn January Factory Orders.

On Wednesday, March 7, at 8:45 AM EST, we get the first read on February jobs situation with the ADP Employment Report.

Thursday, March 8 leads with the Weekly Jobless Claims at 8:30 AM EST, which hit a new 49-year low last week at an amazing 210,000.

On Friday, March 9 at 8:30 AM EST we get the big number of the week with the February Nonfarm Payroll Report. All eyes will be on the wage growth numbers, which came in last month at a red hot 0.50%.

At 1:00 PM we receive the Baker-Hughes Rig Count, which saw a small rise of three last week.

As for me, I am going to be more ambitious in collecting my used aluminum cans and recycling them. I hear they are now a lot more valuable.

Good luck and good trading!

March 5, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
March 5, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(IS THERE A TURNAROUND PLAY AT WESTERN DIGITAL?),
(WDC), (MSFT), (NVDA), (STX), (INTC), (CSCO), (SNAP), (GPRO), (APRN), (CRM), (NFLX)

The First Shots in the Trade War Have Been Fired and You Got Hit!

Diary, Newsletter

There is no doubt about it.

The opening shots of a global trade war have been fired. The bad news is that you got hit.

And we may have to suffer another Great Depression before these errant policies get reversed.

That's what happened last time.

Today we learned that the administration is imposing an emergency 25% tariff on imported steel from ALL countries, friend and foe alike.

This is on the heels of the cancellation of the Trans-Pacific Partnership last year.

The move promises to bring to a screeching halt the import of semi finished goods from Mexico and Canada, essential in the production of US autos. American manufacturing will suffer.

The big victims will be American car buyers, who in the future will have to pay much higher prices for lower quality products.

It also cedes international markets to foreign car manufacturers who will labor under no such restrictions.

This is why the shares of American carmakers have been so badly sold off.

The recent 20% import duty on Canadian lumber achieved much the same. The move will add about $3,000 a year to the cost of new homes.

Notice that there is a commonality in these measures.

They favor a small number of producers at the cost of millions of consumers.

The lumber duty is especially lopsided, benefiting about 1,000 lumbers producers at the expense of 550,000 homebuyers a year.

It is also moving money out of blue liberal states and into red Trump supporting states, where most lumber mills reside.

Expect this trend to continue for three more years.

The costs of these protectionist moves are already being felt.

Mexico, the second largest buyer of American agricultural exports, has started shifting purchases to friendlier Brazil and Argentina.

You can see this across the commodities markets, which are all plumbing new five-year lows. Trump supporting American farmers are about to get totally shafted.

We already know that at the first sign of restrictions against Chinese imports, the Middle Kingdom will simply cancel orders for hundreds of Boeing aircraft and move the business to Airbus Industries in Europe.

I guess we're lucky because it took all of 80 years to forget the hard learned lessons of the last round of "America First" policies during the 1930's. There were many.

Trade wars aren't damaging to the initiators of trade wars. They hurt all countries.

Globalization expands the pie. Protectionism shrinks it. And yes, we will suffer less than our competitors because we have the largest domestic market. But suffer we will nonetheless.

Foreign restrictions on US exports have been blamed for the demise of the US manufacturing base, declining real wages, and falling standards of living.

However, according to the World trade Organization, only 6.5% of global trade is subject to such barriers.

Protectionism is also a highly regressive tax, as the resulting higher prices eat up a larger share of lower earning families.

Protection of an industry signs its death warrant.

I watched this happen to the US auto industry from 1985 to 2009.

President Reagan forced export restrictions on Japanese car manufacturers and engineered the Palace Accord, which resulted in an eventually tripling of the value of the Japanese yen against the US dollar.

What happened?

The Japanese share of the US car market grew steadily from 20% to 45%. It turns out that consumers were happy to pay up for quality and superior technology, which Detroit sorely back.

Detroit could have produced the Prius at any time in the last 50 years. There is no new technology in it. Instead, it was created by Toyota Motors (TM) in Nagoya.

General Motors (GM) eventually went bankrupt, Chrysler got taken over by Fiat, and Ford (F) barely hung on by the skin of its teeth.

Even today, some 50 years into this competition, US car mileages lag Japanese ones by the huge margin

The enemy here isn't foreign competition and protectionism. It is technology and productivity growth.

In fact, blatant protectionism is often used to cover up plain old bad management, as we found out in GM's case.

But don't blame foreigners. Business has been going to lower costs domestic mini mills that run on cheaper scrap metal.

Textile employment has suffered a similar fate, as have toy manufacturing and many other former US manufacturing industries.

When the US does take action to protect an industry, usually a dying one, the costs to consumers are enormous.

In 2009, the Obama administration imposed punitive duties on cheap Chinese tires. The measure saved 1,200 jobs but caused US tire prices to rise 10%. That worked out to about $900,000 per job saved.

Better just to give them Food Stamps.

Despite all the hoopla, I have not heard of a single manufacturer who is shutting down a foreign plant and reopening in the US.

Far more common is fanfare, publicity, and presidential handshakes surrounding the saving of 200 jobs, thanks to some local subsidy, while 2,000, or 20,000 quietly slip abroad.

Yes, it is easy to demonize foreigners and blame all our problems on them. We certainly know they made great campaign fodder.

Yes, we will all have to pay a price for these misbegotten ideas. More likely it will be sooner than later.

Watch out below when the stock market notices.

Is There a Turnaround Play at Western Digital?

Tech Letter

There is a new investment theme that is starting to permeate Silicon Valley.

It hasn't gone mainstream yet but is starting to attract attention because of the spectacular numbers it will bring in.

I call it the "Legacy Turnaround Play."

It goes something like this. Find an ailing technology dinosaur from the Jurassic Period (i.e. the 1990's), infuse it with new management and technology, and the shares go ballistic.

The poster boy for the strategy is none other than the former beast of Redmond, Washington, Microsoft (MSFT), founded by my friends Bill Gates, and the company supervising adult, Paul Allen.

Up until the Dotcom bust, it looked like Microsoft would rule the universe forever. Almost two decades later, its Windows operating system still runs 70% of the world's computers.

The day Bill Gates retired from active management was the day (MSFT) went ex-growth. Steve Ballmer was never more than the custodian of a gigantic legacy business that went nowhere. The shares remained stuck in the doldrums for 15 years.

Also on that fateful day the Gates Foundation sold the bulk of its Microsoft shares, investing tens of billions of dollars into US Treasury bonds. I know this because I reviewed the fund's holding many years ago. It was one of the wisest investment decisions ever made.

Steve Ballmer mercifully retired in 2014, hiring Satya Nadella to replace him. The pick was controversial at the time because Nadella hailed from India.

However, he possessed a vision of The Cloud that was way ahead of its time and proved dead on correct. Since Nadella joined Microsoft, the shares have rocketed some 163%.

This has spurred a frantic search for the next Microsoft, and every legacy tech company is being put under a microscope to ascertain its possibilities.

Intel (INTC) and Cisco Systems (CSCO) are now in the running for "Legacy Turnaround" status, and their share prices are reacting accordingly.

The Silicon valley jungle telegraph has told me that another firm may be about to join its ranks.

That would be Western Digital (WDC). However, the burden of proof is still on the company's management.

You all remember the old Western Digital. Spun off from Emerson Electric Company, Western Digital was the world's largest manufacturer of chips for hand held calculators during the 1970s, the cutting-edge consumer technology product of its day. When the personal computer industry showed up, it moved rapidly into hard drives.

Since then, it hasn't really done anything new, except build bigger and faster hard drives in physically smaller sizes. The problem with that approached is that the world has been moving towards solid state storage now for years.

The hard drive is about to become one of the great dodo birds in the history of technology. Western Digital's shares are virtually unchanged in three years, completely missing the 2016-2018- tech melt up.

You can forget about buying Western Digital (WDC) for a quick-in-and out trade. HDD (Hard Disk Drive) sales are down a dreadful 5.6% YOY.

It was hard to identify a tech stock that didn't have a phenomenal year in 2017 unless it was tainted with terrible offerings like Snapchat (SNAP). The secular long-term growth story for technology is the crux of the bullish argument in equities.

A good chunk of Western Digital's business is derived from the declining HDD storage industry which is a continuing source of torment.

(WDC) is attempting to cross over into SSD (Solid State Drives) which is ripe for hyper-growth in tech storage. Gobbling up SanDisk in 2016 and Tegile Systems in 2017 were definitely positive steps in the right direction.
In 2014, HDD was a pristine $32 billion per year market, but sunk to $20 billion by 2017.

Begrudgingly, (WDC) dominate 40% of the HDD market along with Seagate (STX) who also control roughly 40% of market share.

HDD revenues still comprise the biggest portion of WDC's total revenue.

Once that number shrinks down to 30-35% then a resurgence in the stock could be in the cards and management can start beating the drums of resuscitation.

(WDC) sold off hard after last quarter's earnings first and foremost because of the bitter tussle with Toshiba who is mired in years of chaotic management and mislead investors.

Traders dumped the stock after finding out guidance for earnings per share between $3.20 and $3.30 down from the previous quarter of $3.95.

Making matter worse, (WDC) lost over $800 million last quarter. (WDC) undeniably have a few dilemmas to solve.

Contrarians can argue that (WDC) is cheap on a PE multiple basis. However, (WDC) has been cheap for the last 10 years with no multiple expansion and could still be cheap 10 years from now.

This company has shown zero EPS growth. There is a difference between cheap and great value.

Client Devices revenue for the December quarter increased by 9% YOY, primarily driven by significant growth in SSD's. Their Client Devices segment was down 1% QOQ because of the heavy drag of HDD devices.

One warning sign is how management obscures revenue segments by "client devices" instead of filtering them out into separate categories in the earnings report clearly stating SSD and HDD unit sales.

Management is inherently camouflaging the HDD segment headwinds. It appears less harsh to the novice investor to group HDD weakness with SSD strength.

Data has been created at a record rate worldwide and the value of data is increasingly fueled by advancements in mobile, cloud computing, artificial intelligence and the (IoT) Internet of Things.

The intense growth in data is ramping up demand for larger and more reliable storage infrastructure. To be on the wrong side of this momentum is a death knell especially if you consider tech investors are willing to pay such a premium for growth.

Unfortunately, Western Digital (WDC) utterly fails because it's eggs are in the wrong basket and there is no growth story. The rhetoric is mainly a legacy business that must worry about survival even though revenues are increasing and during a climate of global synchronized growth.

Investors love tech but only the right tech. The wrong tech are companies such as Gopro (GPRO), Blue Apron (APRN), or the Footlocker (FL) of video games, GameStop Corp. (GME) have defective fundamental pillars that should be discarded right away.

The growth percolating in the pipelines is across the board but not in legacy tech dinosaurs with a deficient business model.

The guidance for total gross margin next quarter is 42% to 43%, and although quite healthy, analysts believe margin growth has peaked and further improvement in total revenue is limited.

There are better options in technology with more exciting charts and clear-cut growth stories like Netflix (NFLX), which sport a parabolic chart and a long runway.

Tech is the poster child of growth, and any tech company not growing is not worth investing in.

There is a chance that (WDC) has put in a double top adding to the technically bearish sentiment.

If you look at the rest of your portfolio of tech names we have recommended they are most likely higher probability longs.

Even if you analyze a broad swath of tech from software services such as Salesforce (CRM) to hardware products like NVIDIA (NVDA), accelerating users/units and higher revenue with secular growth is the constant variable.

There is opportunity cost of owning stocks that are falling in a rising market. Stay out of Western Digital until positive clues surface concerning the turnaround.

And especially stay out (WDC) until there is visible momentum and incontestable technical support.

Remember that great companies beat on the bottom and top line sequentially then confidently raise guidance. (WDC) is not a great company, not yet anyway.

March 2, 2018 - MDT Pro Tips A.M.

MDT Alert

While the Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader focuses on investment over a one week to six-month time frame, Mad Day Trader, provided by Bill Davis, will exploit money-making opportunities over a brief ten minute to three day window. It is ideally suited for day traders, but can also be used by long-term investors to improve market timing for entry and exit points. Read more

March 2, 2018

Diary, Newsletter, Summary

Global Market Comments
March 2, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(FEBRUARY 28 GLOBAL STRATEGY WEBINAR Q&A),
(GOOGL), (AAPL), (SPY), (LEN), (FCX), (FXY),
(NOTICE TO MILITARY SUBSCRIBERS)

??

February 28 Global Strategy Webinar Q&A

Diary, Newsletter

Below please find subscribers Q&A for the Mad Hedge Fund Trader February 28 Global Strategy Webinar.

As usual, every asset class long and short was covered. You are certainly an inquisitive lot!

Q: Will we retest the 200-day moving average?

A: No, we won't. With the last test of the 200-day, we didn't even get to the 200-day, we just flirted with it. Moreover, there was a complete washout-not only from, all the short volatility players but, additionally, all the hot money in the market as well. So, I doubt we will get down to the 200-day again this year. Next year is likely, this year no.

Q: What is the next catalyst for a move up in the market?

A: Either a spectacular earnings report from a major company like Apple (and the next one is May 2), or news of the size of major share buybacks from companies like Google (GOOGL), Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), Cisco (CSCO), etc. Some indication of news like that will draw more buyers back into the market.

Q: When will companies start buying back their shares?

A: They are buying them back every day. They're not allowed to buy back shares just before or just after earnings reports, but all of the Q4 earnings reports are done now, so we have a free run here for about two months where most companies are going to be automatically buying their own shares back daily. They're on auto-buy programs to dispel any risk of insider trading in their own shares. That's also why the largest share buyback companies had the largest moves in the last three weeks- Apple was certainly one of them, with the share up $31 in only two weeks.

Q: Should I look to emerging markets now? Is it a better value play than US equities?

A: Yes. I still expect emerging markets to outperform the US stock market by about a 2 to 1 margin. Buy the (EEM) on any dip.

Q: Do you think the infrastructure bill will get passed this year?

A: No, because it will require more deficit spending, and at a certain point the Republicans have to draw the line. We still have a large number of deficit hawks inside the Republican Party. If they do pass something, it will essentially be meaningless, (giving tax breaks for real estate developers or something of that sort). There will be no real impact on the economy or the stock market.

Q: What about LEAPS on NVIDIA (NVDA) and Lam Research (LRCX)?

A: That would have been a great thing to do on Feb 9. You don't want to do LEAPS - long term one-year option positions -??after stocks have just made 30% moves up, you do it before. You only do these at the very bottom of market moves. Because of their long duration, they can really get slaughtered when the stock goes against you.

Q: Is NVIDIA still going up to new highs?

A: Yes. My last bet was for a third double in the shares from $180 to $320, and we are already well on our way. The company is firing on all cylinders.

Q: Should I buy housing stocks?

A: They're still down from February...I would say yes. We see an extreme shortage in housing supply continuing for year, and enormous increases in new construction permits from the big home builders- like up 10% in a month; these are huge numbers. So, I'd have to think that the housing stocks like Lennar (LEN), Pulte Homes (PHM), and KB Homes (KBH) are going to come back big time.

Q: What is your TBT target?

A: I would say right around here I would be happy to take a short-term profit. You don't want to run the TBT for the long-term because it has a -6% per year negative cost of carry. It's a great short-term trading instrument, not a long-term hold. We now have a monster profit - it's just gone from $32 to $40, which is a 25% gain in three months. I'd take that and look for a better re-entry point later.

Q: If we missed the Currency Shares Japan Yen Trust (FXY) short position yesterday, should we go into it today?

A: Yes, but only use limit orders in the middle market. If you get done at your price: great. If not, walk away and just watch it. The fundamentals for the Japanese yen are as terrible as ever.

Q: If you had a choice between gold and Bitcoin, what would you take?

A: Bitcoin, never. It reliably brings us 70% corrections at any time without warning. Buy gold on the next dip. The bull market for the barbarous relic still lives, it's just getting a slow start.

Q: Is First Solar (FSLR) a buy even though it's not supported by the administration?

A: Yes. First Solar's business model is so strong they will be profitable no matter who's in office and whether there are subsidies or not. So, any dip on that is a green light. That's why the shares are up 200% in eight months. They are a back-door oil play. That said, there is some double top risk on the shares right here.

Q: Is Freeport McMoRan (FCX) a hold?

A: Yes, because copper will recover. Guess what electric cars buy tons of? We are moving to a copper-based transportation system. China's economy is also holding steady, which is another major factor supporting copper.

Q: Has your view on commodities changed over the last few months?

A: No, I still think commodities will outperform stocks this year- that view has not changed. You had a fantastic entry point two weeks ago. Look for higher highs now. Commodities are always big movers as we approach the end of an economic cycle.

With all that, I'll see you at the next Global Trading Strategy webinar on March 14 at 12:00 EST.

Good Luck and Good Trading!
John Thomas
CEO & Publisher
Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader

Notice to Military Subscribers

Diary, Newsletter, Research

To the dozens of subscribers in Afghanistan and the surrounding ships at sea, thank you for your service!

I think it is very wise to use your free time to read my letter and learn about financial markets in preparation for an entry into the financial services when you muster out.

Nobody is going to call you a baby killer and shun you, as they did when I returned from Southeast Asia four decades ago. In fact, employers have been given fantastic tax breaks and other incentives to hire you.

I have but one request. No more subscriptions with .mil addresses, please. The Defense Department, the CIA, the NSA, Homeland Security, and the FBI do not look kindly on private newsletters entering the military network, even the investment kind.

If you think civilian spam filters are tough, watch out for the military kind! And no, I promise that there are no secret messages embedded with stock tips. "BUY" really does mean "BUY." "Sel" means "Sell" too.

If I did not know the higher ups at these agencies, as well as the Joint Chiefs of Staff, I might be bouncing off the walls in a cell at Guantanamo by now wearing an orange jumpsuit.

It also helps that many of the mid-level officers at these organizations have made a fortune with their meager government retirement funds following my advice. All I can say is that if the Baghdad Stock Exchange ever becomes liquid, I'm going to own it.

Where would you guess the greatest concentration of readers of The Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader is found? New York? Nope. London? Wrong. Chicago? Not even close. Try a ten-mile radius centered around Langley, Virginia, by a large margin.

The funny thing is, half of the subscribing names coming in are Russian. I haven't quite figured that one out yet. Did we hire the entire KGB at the end of the cold war? If we did, it was a great move. Those guys were good. That includes you, Yuri.

So keep up the good work, and fight the good fight. But please, only subscribe to my letter with personal Gmail, Yahoo, or Hotmail addresses. That way my life can become a lot more boring.

Oh, and by the way, Langley, you're behind on your bill. Please pay up, pronto, and I don't want to hear whining about any damn budget cuts!

I Want My Mad Hedge Fund Trader!

March 2, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
March 2, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(WHEN WILL THE GOVERNMENT HAVE TO KILL A FANG?),
(FB), (AAPL), (NFLX), (GOOGL), (AMZN), (TWTR)

??

When Will the Government Have to Kill a FANG?

Tech Letter

By now, we all have major over weightings of FANG's in our retirement portfolios. And the greatest threat to those holdings is the prospect of imminent government regulation.

The prospect of government involvement in the FANG's should therefore be more of just passing interest to us.

The relationship between large cap tech companies and the US government is not exactly a match made in heaven.

The hot button political topic of the day is how Russia used Facebook (FB) to influence the US presidential election. (FB) in effect lowered the drawbridge to allow our foreign enemies to come flooding in, and no one noticed until it was too late.

In fact, to say that government and tech are constantly butting heads would be an understatement. However, not all governments are created the same.

China's government has built a formidable moat around their tech industry, granting priority only to local firms and shutting out the rest. Notice that Alphabet (GOOGL) closed its offices in China five years ago.

Europeans have stuck with the school teacher approach by punishing their pupils individually. But the school itself has bigger sway in the grand scheme of things.

Broad based guidelines from the European Commission were handed down today dictating that Google (GOOGL), Facebook, and Twitter (TWTR) have one hour to remove unsavory content from their platforms, or else.

Keep in mind, these new protocols are "voluntary" and follow a series of other "voluntary" self-regulating precepts.

FANG's are still not accountable for anything posted on their platform and are thus insulated from liability. The notion that FANG's will self-police their own platform still pervades through official channels.

Fining FANG's appear authoritative enough to diverse political constituencies, but cash isn't a problem for FANG's. Each one is a mere slap on the wrist.

Preventing a FANG's unstoppable business model is the only solution and that will never happen.

Obviously, the E.U. have a sluggish grasp of how Fang's actually work.

FANG's are an entirely American made creation. Government, by and large, subscribing to the wonders of dynamic market forces, allowed the contest to play out in the trenches and not behind the scenes.

America's hyper competitive business model is also a graveyard littered with once promising tech companies, like MySpace, Napster, and Blackberry's (BB) mobile phone division.

The hope is that FANG model will continue to naturally evolve and self-regulate.

The big takeaway from government is that regulating big tech is a complicated issue. And government will deflect responsibility if pressured into destroying a Fang.

In essence, the net benefit of keeping the FANG's around could be greater than the net cost of getting rid of them for a sovereign nation, especially the consumer.

Today, FANG's are untouchable in cloud services, social media, search capability, e-commerce, advertising, tablets and mobile. The modern economy can't function without them.

Google and Facebook are observing and tracking every user's move, and that feedback is following through back to their reservoir of big data.

The colossal data profile they possess on each individual deduces users' hobbies, purchases, search trends, browsing patterns, location history, and loads more, even sexual orientation.

This probing system refines their hyper-targeting model, which has many unintended consequences, such as the ability to weaponize parts of the platform by rogue elements.

Fixing this problem is challenging and it's possible there are no good fixes out there at all. Jack Dorsey pleaded to users today to give suggestions on making Twitter a better user experience.

He knows the increased pace of weaponization on his platform will ultimately come back to haunt him as the CEO.

FANG's apply user data as inputs for evolving Artificial Intelligence (AI) consisting of a collection of filters. This check lists controls the content that pops up on to your screen based on the structure of finely tuned algorithms.

Google and Facebook (FB) offer the highest quality hyper-targeting in the world and advertisers pay for that quality.

If a negative unintended consequence transpires from a rogue algorithm, the FANG's have proved adept at paying lip service to the right actors to stave off the heat for another day. Kicking the can down the road seems to be their long-term strategy.

Complicating the mess is the fact that 100% of the blame cannot be directly pinned on an unknowing FANG if a team of nefarious hackers cause a ruckus from their computers in some distant land.

The fundamental idea of profit through data privacy and accumulation violently conflicts with the FANG's core business aspirations: hyper-targeted advertising based on increasingly intrusive personal surveillance. They will not change themselves if it means hindering their profitability.

Who would?

One challenge that the American government must hurdle is understanding the magnitude of the situation at hand. Do our politicians understand how to instill more algorithmic accountability and instill privacy policy transparency?

Effectively, playing Tech God is a slippery slope to go down. It's easier said than done, and there are many moving parts to this game. American big government is not ready to destroy a FANG in the land of free enterprise.

You can kiss the nine-year equity bull market good-bye if the government actually kills off Facebook or a Google!

The consensus view is the FANG's will continue to increase our standard of living.

Accelerating additional hyper-targeting, greater algorithmic favoritism, squashing competition and widespread erosion of adjacent industries. And most importantly for investors - higher profits and share prices.

Consumers have benefited immensely from all these free services. It's the competition that's complaining because they aren't FANG's themselves. Life must feel very unfair if you don't have the same tools as FANG companies.

Amazon was clever enough to take profits from their Amazon Web Services (AWS) division to bolster their loss-making e-commerce division. In the process, they crushed American brick and mortar retail.

Shareholders call this genius, while competitors and politicians call this a breach of anti-trust.

Any regulatory blow back that results in a dip of share prices should therefore be bought once the dust settles.

That day could be sometime in the far future, but there will be many twists and turns until we arrive there.

Investors need to ask themselves, does the government have the authority and the determination to ruin a FANG? The answer is no.

What the government is telling investors is they will dabble with the bare minimum of token regulation, but aren't ready to drop the guillotine on large cap tech. The long-term secular growth story is still intact albeit with occasional regulatory friction.

Every dip will be bought by investors queued up for years patiently waiting for an entry point, and the shares upside will be tapered by occasional regulatory headlines.

Regulation will never amount to more than that.