• support@madhedgefundtrader.com
  • Member Login
Mad Hedge Fund Trader
  • Home
  • About
  • Store
  • Luncheons
  • Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
MHFTR

The Great American Jobs Mismatch

Diary, Newsletter, Research

With the Weekly Jobless Claims bouncing around a new 43-year low at 220,000, it's time to review the state of the US labor market.

Yes, I know this research piece isn't going to generate an instant Trade Alert for you.

But it is essential in your understanding of the big picture.

There are also thousands of students who read my website looking for career advice, and I have a moral obligation to read the riot act to them.

With a 4.1% headline unemployment rate, the US economy is now at its theoretical employment maximum. If you can't get a job now, you never will.

We may see a few more tenths of a percent decline in the rate from here, but no more. To get any lower than that you have to go all the way back to WWII.

Then there was even a shortage of one-armed, three-fingered, illiterate recruits with venereal disease, the minimum US Army recruitment standards of the day.

Speaking to readers across the country and perusing the Department of Labor data, I can tell you that not all is equal in the jobs market today.

You can blame America's halls of higher education, which are producing graduates totally out of sync with the nation's actual skills needs.

Take a look at this table of graduating majors to job offers, and you'll see what I am talking about:

Major - Job Offers Offered per Graduating Major

Computer Science - 21:1
Engineering - 15:1
Physical Sciences (oil) - 13:1
Humanities - 5:1
Business and accounting - 4:1
Economics - 4:1
Agriculture - 2:1
Education - 0.4:1
Health Sciences - 0.2:1

To clarify the above data, there are 21 companies attempting to hire each computer science graduate today, while there are five kids battling it out to get each job in Health Sciences.

To understand what's driving these massive jobs per applicant disparities, take a look at the next table nationally ranking graduating majors desired by corporations.

Graduating Majors Desired by Employers

81% - Business and Accounting
76% - Engineering
64% - Computer science
34% - Economics
21% - Physical Science
12% - Humanities
5% - Agriculture
2% - Health Science

There is something screamingly obvious about these numbers.

Colleges are not producing what employers want.

This is creating enormous imbalances in the jobs market.

It explains why computer science students are landing $150,000-a-year jobs straight out of school, complete with generous benefits and health care. Many employers in Silicon Valley are now offering to pay down student debt in order to get the most desirable candidates to sign a contract.

In the meantime, Health Sciences and Humanities graduates are lucky to land a $25,000-a-year posting at a nonprofit with no benefits and Obamacare. And there are no offers to pay down student debt, which can rise to as much as $200,000 for an Ivy League degree.

Agriculture grads usually go to work on a family farm, which they eventually inherit.

As a result of these dismal figures, the character of American education is radically changing.

With students now graduating with an average of $35,000 in debt, no one can afford to remain jobless upon graduation for long.

That's why the number of Humanities graduates has declined from 9% in 2012 to 6% today.

Colleges are getting the message. Since 1990, one-third of those with the words "liberal arts" in their name or prospectus have dropped the term.

Students who do stick with anthropology, philosophy, English literature, or history are learning a few tricks as well.

Add a minor in Accounting and Management and it will increase your first-year salary by $13,000. Toss in some Data Base Management skills, and the increase will be even greater.

And online marketing? The world is your oyster!

These realities have even come home to my own family.

I have a daughter working on a PhD in Education from the University of California, and the mathematics workload is enormous, especially in statistics.

It is all so she can qualify for government research grants upon graduation.

The students themselves are partly to blame for this mismatch.

While recruiters report an average of $45,000 a year as an average first year offer, the graduates themselves are expecting an average first-year income of $53,000.

Companies almost universally report that interviewees have a "bloated" sense of their own abilities, poor interviewing skills, and unrealistic pay expectations.

Some one-third of all applicants are unqualified for the jobs for which they are applying.

The good news is that everyone gets a job eventually. A National Association of Colleges and Employers survey says that companies plan to hire 5% more college graduates than last year.

And where do all of those Humanities grads eventually go.

A lot become financial advisors.

Just ask.

 

Sorry, STEM Students Only!

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/College-photo-story-2-image-1-e1524087053435.jpg 225 300 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-04-19 01:06:582018-04-19 01:06:58The Great American Jobs Mismatch
MHFTR

April 19, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 19, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(HOW ROKU IS WINNING THE STREAMING WARS),

(ROKU), (FB), (AMZN), (NFLX), (GOOGL), (BBY), (DIS)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-04-19 01:06:102018-04-19 01:06:10April 19, 2018
MHFTR

How Roku is Winning the Streaming Wars

Tech Letter

The whole digital ad industry dodged a bullet.

Facebook (FB) CEO Mark Zuckerberg's wizardry on Capitol Hill will stave off the data regulation hyenas for the time being.

One company in particular is perfectly placed to reap the benefits.

The Facebook of online streaming - Roku (ROKU).

Roku is a cluster of in-house, manufactured, online streaming devices offering OTT (over-the-top) content in the form of channels on its proprietary platform.

The company has two foundational drivers propelling business - selling hardware devices and selling digital ads.

It pays dividends to be entrenched at the intersection of two monumental generational trends of cord cutters' mass migration to online streaming, and the disruption of the digital ad revolution that is shaking up traditional media giants.

The percentage of American homes paying for an online streaming service ripped higher to 55% of households, which is up from 49% the previous year.

This $2.1 billion per month spend on streaming service is specifically as a result of access to premium content at an affordable price relative to traditional cable bundles.

Roku is a microcosm of the healthy climate for quality technology stocks in 2018.

It is among countless other firms that leverage large-scale data or cloud tools to capture profits.

Roku is best of breed of smart TV platforms and is in the early stages of robust growth.

This year will be the first year Roku's ad revenue surpasses hardware sales, indicating strong platform growth.

Roku pinpointed building account user growth, top-line gross revenue, and enhancing the platform capabilities as ways to move the business forward.

This year will also be the first year Roku posts an overall profit.

Active accounts grew 44% YOY to 19.3 million.

Roku offers consumers a cheap point of entry selling its Roku express box for only $29.99.

Its device is even free with a two-month purchase of Sling TV, which is the best online substitute to a legacy cable package. It has two sets of unique bundles available, charging $20 per month and $40 per month.

Once the Roku home screen populates, users can choose content through a la carte streaming options.

There is no monthly fee to operate Roku, and the device is used primarily by millennials.

More than 60% of 18- to 29-year-olds watch TV from online streaming, according to a Pew survey.

The quality and easy-to-use interface aids user navigation across the ecosystem.

It's the most convenient avenue to subscribe to multiple online streaming services all on one platform. It entices finicky users with extra mobility - those who love to jump around to different services based on particular upcoming content loaded up in the pipeline.

Many of these services offer no contract, cancel-anytime models that millennials love rather than the "old-school" rigid rules of cable providers that mostly charge a cancellation penalty of $300.

It is shocking how far traditional media fell behind the curve, but they are in rapid catch-up mode now.

Remember that content is king, and the overall boost in content quality has really shaken Hollywood executives to their core.

The golden age of streaming continues unabated with a Netflix 2018 annual content budget of $8 billion.

Roku does not create original content and it desires no skin in the game.

Content is expensive, and Roku would rather become the best place to host it.

Netflix's 2017 total revenue was a staggering $11.69 billion in 2017, and content costs will easily surpass 50% of total revenue in 2018. Overnight, it has become one of the biggest players in Hollywood, as its presence at the Emmy Awards amply demonstrates.

Exorbitant content costs are the new normal in 2018, and Spotify has reason to moan about the cost of content being 79% of total revenue.

Heightened content costs are the main reason why firms relying on content creation lose money each year.

However, as the overall pie grows, there is room for the tide to lift all boats. Being the premier platform to host premium content is why Roku's business model is eerily similar to Facebook's hyper-targeting ad model.

They make money the same way.

The incessant demand for online streaming functionality and smart TV operating systems show no signs of waning with Amazon (AMZN) announcing a new partnership with frenemy Best Buy (BBY) to produce smart TVs with Best Buy's in-house TV brand Insignia.

This is the first time Best Buy has been afforded a direct route to Amazon customers.

Disney (DIS) is turning around its legacy company into an online streaming behemoth announcing its first foray into online streaming with ESPN+.

Disney has tripled down on online streaming, acquiring New York-based BAMTech in late 2017, a company focused on developing streaming technology and made famous by its production of pro baseball's MLB TV.

BAMTech exudes pure quality. Anyone who has used MLB TV streaming service understands the great end-product it offers consumers.

The outstanding success with MLB TV attracted new online streaming converts to BAMTech to execute the transition to online streaming, including the WWE, Fox Sports, PlayStation Vue, and Hulu.

HBO went to BAMTech in 2014, after botching its attempt at creating a reliable stand-alone streaming service.

Disney's BAMTech-produced online streaming service will come to market in 2019, and will certainly be available on Roku TV.

Expect new blockbuster hits to debut on this new streaming service, such as new versions of Star Wars.

It is the perfect stock to mutate into an online streaming service because it possesses amazing content especially through ESPN.

The announcement of ESPN+ levitated Roku shares by 10% because investors understand this is the first baby step to shifting more of its content online.

This was on top of the announcement that Stephen A. Cohen's Point72 Asset Management had acquired a 5.1% stake in Roku for about $14 billion.

Furthermore, every major streaming service that enters Roku's system is worth an extra 5% to 10% bump in share price because of the wave of eyeballs and digital ads that grow Roku's coffers.

It is certain that 2018 and 2019 will sway more cord cutters to adopt Roku TV as this cohort approaches 70 million in 2018 on its way to 80 million in 2019.

The critical growth lever is its digital ad business as it hopes to take home a slice of this $70 billion per year business that is 75% controlled by Alphabet (GOOGL) and Facebook.

Roku has made great strides with half of Ad Age's top 200 advertisers already on the Roku interface.

Roku is taking the playbook right out from under Facebook's nose, piling funds into further enhancing its ad-tech division.

The blood, sweat, and tears shed is showing up in the financials with ARPU (Average Revenue per User) rocketing by 48% YOY, and more than 65% of this gap up is attributed to digital ad revenue.

Total revenue was up 29% YOY to $513 million, and platform revenue grew 129% in Q4 2017 to $85.4 million.

It is estimated that ad revenue will surpass $300 million in 2018, up from around $200 million in 2017.

Roku expects total revenue to grow 32% in 2018, approaching $700 million.

Profit margins are thriving under the platform segment, pumping out a stellar 74.6% in gross margin.

Roku does not make money on the hardware. Its push into ad distribution will ramp up as its digital ad revenue beelines toward an expected $700 million windfall by 2020.

Roku has a fantastic growth trajectory relative to other tech companies. Heightened volatility will make sell-offs hard to swallow but give fabulous entry points into a budding business.

The fertile path of international user adoption has barely scratched the surface. However, Netflix's successful foray abroad will inject confidence that Roku will have no problem expanding to greener pastures overseas as domestic account growth is always first to mature.

 

 

 

 

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Quote of the Day

"AI is one of the most important things humanity is working on. It is more profound than electricity or fire." - said Google CEO Sundar Pichai

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ROKU-TV-image-4-e1524079009298.jpg 287 450 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-04-19 01:05:302018-04-19 01:05:30How Roku is Winning the Streaming Wars
Arthur Henry

Trade Alert - (VXX) April 18, 2018 BUY

Trade Alert

When John identifies a strategic exit point, he will send you an alert with specific trade information as to what security to sell, when to sell it, and at what price. Most often, it will be to TAKE PROFITS, but, on rare occasions, it will be to exercise a STOP LOSS at a predetermined price to adhere to strict risk management discipline. Read more

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Arthur Henry https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Arthur Henry2018-04-18 13:57:182018-04-18 13:57:18Trade Alert - (VXX) April 18, 2018 BUY
Arthur Henry

Tech Trade Alert - (INTC) April 18, 2018 TAKE PROFITS

Tech Alert

When John identifies a strategic exit point, he will send you an alert with specific trade information as to what security to sell, when to sell it, and at what price. Most often, it will be to TAKE PROFITS, but, on rare occasions, it will be to exercise a STOP LOSS at a predetermined price to adhere to strict risk management discipline. Read more

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Arthur Henry https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Arthur Henry2018-04-18 11:22:012018-04-18 11:22:01Tech Trade Alert - (INTC) April 18, 2018 TAKE PROFITS
Douglas Davenport

April 18, 2018 - MDT Pro Tips A.M.

MDT Alert

While the Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader focuses on investment over a one week to six-month time frame, Mad Day Trader, provided by Bill Davis, will exploit money-making opportunities over a brief ten minute to three day window. It is ideally suited for day traders, but can also be used by long-term investors to improve market timing for entry and exit points. Read more

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 Douglas Davenport https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png Douglas Davenport2018-04-18 08:54:142018-04-18 08:54:14April 18, 2018 - MDT Pro Tips A.M.
MHFTR

April 18, 2018

Diary, Newsletter

Global Market Comments
April 18, 2018
Fiat Lux

Special Residential Real Estate Issue

Featured Trade:
(WHY THE HOMEBUILDERS ARE NOT DEAD YET),
(DHI), (TOL), (LEN), (ITB), (KBH)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-04-18 01:07:352018-04-18 01:07:35April 18, 2018
MHFTR

April 18, 2018

Tech Letter

Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 18, 2018
Fiat Lux

Featured Trade:
(WHY YOU SHOULD STILL BE BUYING FACEBOOK ON THIS DIP),

(FB), (GOOGL), (AMZN), (NFLX)

https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png 0 0 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-04-18 01:06:432018-04-18 01:06:43April 18, 2018
MHFTR

Why the Homebuilders Are Not Dead Yet

Diary, Newsletter, Research

It was as if someone had turned out the lights.

The homebuilders, after delivering one of the most prolific investment performance of any sector until the end of January, suddenly collapsed.

Since then, they have been dead as a door knob, flat on their backs, barely exhibiting a breath of life. While most of the market has since seen massive short covering rallies, the homebuilders have remained moribund.

The knee-jerk reaction has been to blame rising interest rates. But in fact, rates have barely moved since the homebuilders peaked, the 10-year US treasury yield remaining confined to an ultra-narrow tedious 2.72% to 2.95% yield.

The surprise Canadian limber import duty has definitely hurt, raising the price of a new home by an average of $3,000. But that is not enough to demolish the entire sector, especially given long lines at homebuilder model homes.

Are the homebuilders gone for good? Or are they just resting.

I vote for the later.

For years now, I have begged, pleaded, and beseeched readers to pour as much money as they can into residential real estate.

Investing in your own residence has generated far and away the largest returns on investment for the past five years, and this will continue for the next 10 to 15 years.

For we are still in the early innings of a major real estate boom.

A home you buy today could increase in value tenfold by 2030, and more if you do so on the high-growth coasts.

And while I have been preaching this view to followers for years, I have been assaulted by the slings and arrows of naysayers predicting that the next housing crash is just around the corner - only this time, it will be worse.

I have recently gained some important new firepower in my campaign.

My friends at alma mater UC Berkley (Go Bears!), specifically the Fisher Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics, have just published a report written by the Rosen Consulting Group that is blowing the socks off the entire real estate world.

The implications for markets, and indeed the nation as a whole, are nothing less than mind-blowing.

It's like having a Marine detachment of 155 mm howitzers suddenly come in on your side.

The big revelation is that only a few minor tweaks and massaging of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 could unleash a new tidal wave of home buyers that will send house prices, and the shares of homebuilders (ITB) ballistic.

The real estate industry would at last be restored to its former glory.

That's the happy ending. Now let's get down to the nitty gritty.

First, let's review the wreckage of the 2008 housing crash.

Real estate probably suffered more than any other industry during the Great Recession.

After all, the banks received a federal bailout, and General Motors was taken over by the Feds. Remember Cash for Clunkers?

No such luck with politically unconnected real estate agents and homebuilders.

As a result, private homeownership in the US has cratered from 69.2% in 2006 to 63.4% in 2016, a 50-year low.

Homeownership for married couples was cut from 84.1% to 79.6%.

Among major cities, San Diego led the charge to the downside, an area where minority and immigrant participation in the market is particularly high, with homeownership shrinking from 65.7% to a lowly 51.8%.

Home price declines were worse in the major subprime cities of Las Vegas, Phoenix, and Miami.

There were a staggering 9.4 million foreclosures during 2007-2014, with adjustable rate loans accounting for two-thirds of the total.

Some 8.7 million jobs were lost from 2007-2010, while the unemployment rate soared from 5.0% to 10%. The collapse in disposable income that followed made a rapid recovery in home prices impossible.

As a result, real estate's contribution to US GDP growth fell from 17.9% of the total to only 15.6% in 2016.

That is a big hit for the economy and is a major reason why growth has remained stuck in recent years at a 2% annual rate.

While the ruins were still smoking, Congress passed Dodd-Frank in 2010. The bill succeeded in preventing any more large banks from going under, with massive recapitalization requirements.

As a result, US banks are now the strongest in the world (and also a great BUY at these levels).

But it also clipped the banks' wings with stringent new lending restrictions.

I recently refinanced my homes to lock in 3% interest rates for the long term, since inflation is returning, and I can't tell you what a nightmare it was.

I had to pay a year's worth of home insurance and county property taxes in advance, which were then kept in an impound account.

I was forced to supply two years worth of bank statements for five different accounts.

Handing over two years worth of federal tax returns wasn't good enough.

To prevent borrowers from ginning up their own on TurboTax, a common tactic for marginal borrowers before the last crash, they must be independently verified with a full IRS transcript.

Guess what? A budget constrained IRS is remarkably slow and inefficient at performing this task. Three attempts are common, while your loan sits in limbo.

(And don't even think of asking for Donald Trump's return when you do this. They have NO sense of humor at the IRS!)

Heaven help you if you have a FICO score under 700.

I had to hand over a dozen letters of explanation dealing with assorted anomalies in my finances. My life is complicated.

Their chief goal seemed to be to absolve the lender from any liability whatsoever.

And here's the real killer.

From 2014, banks were forced to require from borrowers a 43% debt service to income ratio. In other words, your monthly interest payment, property taxes, and real estate taxes can't exceed 43% of your monthly gross income.

This hurdle alone has been the death of a thousand loans.

It is no surprise then that the outstanding balance of home mortgages has seen its sharpest drop in history, from $11.3 trillion to $9.8 trillion during 2008-2014. It is down by a third since the 2007 peak.

Loans that DO get done have seen their average FICO scores jump from 707 to 760.

Rocketing home prices are making matters worse, by reducing affordability.

Only 56% of the population can now qualify to buy the mean American home priced at $224,000, which is up 7.7% YOY.

Residential fixed investment is now 32% lower than the 2005 peak.

Also weighing on the market was a student loan balance that rocketed by 400% to $1.3 trillion since 2003. This eliminated a principal source of first-time buyers from the market, a major source of new capital at the low end.

Now for the good news.

Keep Dodd-Frank's capital requirements, but ease up on the lending standards only slightly, and all of the trends that have been a drag on the market quickly reverse.

And yes, some 2.3% in missing US GDP comes back in a hurry, and then some. That's a whole year's worth of economic growth at current rates.

Rising incomes generated by a full employment economy increase loan approvals.

Foreclosure rates will fall.

More capital will pour into homebuilding, alleviating severely constrained supply.

More investment in homes as inflation hedges steps up from here.

The entry of Millennials into the market in a serious way for the first time further increases demand.

Promised individual tax cuts will add a turbocharger to this market.

There is one way the Trump administration could demolish this housing renaissance.

If the deductibility of home mortgage interest from taxable income on Form 1040 Schedule "A" is cut back or eliminated to pay for tax cuts for the wealthy, a proposal now being actively discussed in the White House, the whole party is canceled.

The average American will lose his biggest tax break, and the impact on housing will be huge.

A continued war on immigrants will also hurt, which accounted for one-third of all new households from 1994-2015.

You see, we let them in for a good reason.

Assuming this policy self-inflicted wound doesn't happen, the entire homebuilding sector is a screaming "BUY."

On the menu are Toll Brothers (TOL), DH Horton (DHI), and Pulte Homes (PHM).

You can also add the IShares US Home Construction ETF (ITB), a basket of the leading homebuilding names (For the prospectus, click here.)

To read the UC Berkeley report in its entirety, entitled Homeownership in Crisis: Where Are We Now? a must for any serious real estate professional or investor, please download the PDF file for free by clicking here.

The bottom line here is that after a three-month break, the stirrings of a recovery in homebuilders may be just beginning.

 

 

 

 

 

Where It's Hot

 

It's Always Better on the Coasts

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Coast-image-6-e1524006948851.jpg 327 580 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-04-18 01:06:012018-04-18 01:06:01Why the Homebuilders Are Not Dead Yet
MHFTR

Why You Should STILL Be Buying Facebook on this Dip

Tech Letter

He did just enough.

He did 5% enough, but it should have been 10%.

That was the performance of the highly controversial data company Facebook (FB) in the wake of Mark Zuckerberg's (the aforementioned "he") testimony in front of politicians who failed to correctly pronounce his name let alone understand his business model.

But Zuckerberg did well.

Well enough that investors approved in droves.

Facebook shares tanked after the Cambridge Analytica scandal was disclosed, and the stock traded 16% below its February high.

The FANG stocks lost more than $200 billion in market value at one point when the headlines went viral.

Amazon (AMZN) and Netflix (NFLX) accounted for more than 30% of the S&P 500's 2018 gains in February, and their contribution has dipped to about 24% as of early April.

The leadership burden for large-cap tech is a resilient pillar propping up the equity market.

Let's get this straight - there has been no regulation as of yet but this moves forward any regulation that eventually was going to happen.

However, it could be a highly diluted version of any worst-case scenarios of which one could think.

The big question: Will earnings and guidance be sideswiped because of higher data costs?

And how many of the 2.2 billion MAU (Monthly Active Users) permanently deleted their Facebook accounts?

Facebook profile removals surged to 4,000 to 5,000 the first few days after the news hit and decreased to 2,000 per day in late March. The numbers further subsided to 1,000 at the start of April.

Deletions around the political testimony were clocking in between 1,000 to 2,000 per day.

To put this into perspective, the extirpation of accounts was only about 30% of the Snapchat rebellion where users quit in hoards because of a sub-optimal design refresh.

The media has done its best to sensationalize events and avoid the fact that hyper-targeting ad models has been around for years and has been used by various companies.

Facebook is not the only one.

Bottom line, there has been no material damage to user volume, and the testimony will empower tech because of Washington's botched question session.

Most of Facebook's profits come from less than 10% of user accounts.

Facebook is a one-trick pony with 98% of profits coming from ad revenue.

To add granularity, the bulk of revenue derives from developed nations mainly from North America, which make up more than 50%, and Europe at about 30% of total revenue.

Falling user engagement from the developed English speaking world would be a canary in the coal mine.

I am not talking about a few thousand profile deletions. However, a mass removal of 50,000 profiles or 100,000 profiles per day would throw Mark Zuckerberg into a tizzy.

If Facebook can convince users to stick around then Mark Zuckerberg is the ultimate winner.

With all the fearmongering, some facts get swept under the carpet. And it could be the case that many users are fine with Facebook possessing large swaths of their personal data.

In reality, users might prefer Facebook to Washington when it comes to possessing their personal information.

The performance of politicians lined up to interrogate Mark Zuckerberg was an unmitigated disaster for the political elite.

It is clear there is a competency issue with politicians. The generation bias has given us a fleet of politicians who have almost zero grasp of technology and its pervasive use in America's economy.

Many politicians showed a weak grasp of Facebook's profit engine.

Some politicians were more focused on Facebook's diversity policy than the real issue at hand.

Let's not forget Zuckerberg also controls 60% of voting rights through his accumulation of Facebook Class B shares and has an iron grip on any direction where the company traverses.

Any meaningful regulation costs will be passed onto the advertisers as a cost of doing business.

This is the key lever investors don't fully understand.

Facebook currently uses an auction-based system for ad pricing but could easily slip in stand-alone regulatory fees to compensate the extra costs.

The industries move from CPC (cost per click) to CPM (cost per impression) including duopoly playmate Alphabet (GOOGL) is a great strategy to pad profits.

The only real incurred cost to Facebook is the in-house DevOps team responsible for platform enhancement.

Facebook tried to experiment in 2016 by charging Facebook-owned smartphone messaging service WhatsApp users a $1 per year fee to use the messaging service.

It has done the groundwork to roll out a mass paid service.

Facebook later decided against this move as many users of WhatsApp are from undeveloped countries with no access to credit card payment services.

Zuckerberg is awkward. However, he has come a long way since his hoody days, even using smoke and mirrors to wriggle out of probing questions.

Half the "grilling" he received in Washington was met with the same vanilla answer saying that his team will get back to them.

The peak of evasiveness was Zuckerberg's response to a question about the willingness to change the business model in the interest of protecting individual privacy.

Zuckerberg stated he was "not sure what that means."

The hammering in Facebook shares was overdone.

It is obvious Washington is no match for large cap tech.

Facebook's upside trajectory has been sacrificed in the short term, but one could argue regulation was on the way - regardless of this data breach.

Regulation is a natural progression for an industry with almost no meaningful regulation.

Therefore, a little regulation for tech does not mean the end of tech.

Facebook is not going out of business. Not anytime soon.

Facebook earned revenue of $27.64 billion in 2016, on the back of $40.65 billion in 2017.

Facebook does not need to be "fixed" - it just needs a few bandages in place before it goes back onto the field.

These bandages will damage operating margins that are currently at 57% in Q4 2017, but their long-term fundamentals are still intact.

The wall of worry is unfounded and ad engagement is still solid.

Facebook is in store for record bottom- and top-line numbers when earnings come out. Ad revenue numbers and the guidance will be the key metric to digest.

Investors might want Zuckerberg to kitchen sink the quarter because most of the bad news is already priced into the stock and might as well dig out all the skeletons in the closet.

Regulation is positive for Facebook because Facebook and the rest of the FANGs are in the best position to confront the regulations. The worst case scenario is finding a backdoor way to navigate through the new rules just as the backdoor way of profiting through ad distribution.

The headline hysteria makes it seem like Facebook is about to go under and file Chapter 11.

The bar has been set so low for upcoming earnings that any reasonable guidance will be seen as a victory.

Advertisers have no choice but to pay for Facebook ads if they want to grow business - that has not changed.

Facebook is growing so fast that the CEO could not name the competition when he was asked at the hearing.

There is a huge short squeeze setting up for the next earnings report due out on April 25, 2018.

Lastly, WhatsApp recently surpassed 1.5 billion MAU with users sending more than 60 billion messages every day.

Remember that Mark Zuckerberg purchased WhatsApp when it had around 500 million MAU back in February 2014.

This service hasn't even started to monetize yet and was a genius piece of business for $19.3 billion in 2014.

The valuation is at least double to triple the price of purchase now but seemed ludicrously expensive when Facebook snapped it up at the time.

Facebook has bottomed out, and the added bonus is it is quite insulated from all the tariff chaos whipsawing the equity markets.

 

 

 

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Quote of the Day

"I'm on the Facebook board now. Little did they know that I thought Facebook was really stupid when I first heard about it back in 2005."- said founder and CEO of Netflix Reed Hastings

 

https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Revenue-image-2-e1523997237741.jpg 432 580 MHFTR https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png MHFTR2018-04-18 01:05:472018-04-18 01:05:47Why You Should STILL Be Buying Facebook on this Dip
Page 125 of 175«‹123124125126127›»

tastytrade, Inc. (“tastytrade”) has entered into a Marketing Agreement with Mad Hedge Fund Trader (“Marketing Agent”) whereby tastytrade pays compensation to Marketing Agent to recommend tastytrade’s brokerage services. The existence of this Marketing Agreement should not be deemed as an endorsement or recommendation of Marketing Agent by tastytrade and/or any of its affiliated companies. Neither tastytrade nor any of its affiliated companies is responsible for the privacy practices of Marketing Agent or this website. tastytrade does not warrant the accuracy or content of the products or services offered by Marketing Agent or this website. Marketing Agent is independent and is not an affiliate of tastytrade. 

Legal Disclaimer

There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.

Copyright © 2025. Mad Hedge Fund Trader. All Rights Reserved. support@madhedgefundtrader.com
Scroll to top