May 29 Biweekly Strategy Webinar Q&A
Below please find subscribers’ Q&A for the Mad Hedge Fund Trader May 29 Global Strategy Webinar with my guest and co-host Bill Davis of the Mad Day Trader. Keep those questions coming!
Q: Why haven’t you added any short positions?
A: My floor is littered with trade alerts on short positions that didn’t get executed because the market fell apart too fast. In fact, that happened just yesterday; I tried to buy the Russel 2000 June $155-$160 vertical bear put spread but the rally only lasted essentially 10 minutes so there was no way to get it off.
Q: Would you buy United States US Treasury Bond Fund (TLT) at this point?
A: Please, have you learned nothing? A ten-point move up in weeks is where you sell, not buy! We last bought the (TLT) at $118 and we’re now at $130. The idea of buying on top of a ten-point rally is a great way to simply throw away money. So, no, I would not buy the (TLT) at this point.
Q: What is your opinion on the Fed backstopping the market with accommodative policy stance? A: The bond futures are already indicating a 50% chance of a half-point rate cut by the end of the year, and an 88% chance of a 25-basis point cut by the end of the year. So, the market is already doing what the Fed should do and it’s having no impact whatsoever. If we’re really going into a recession, the Fed can take interest rates to zero and still it will provide no support for stocks because 1) Interest rates have been so low for so long, they’re no longer much of a factor in the economy 2) Falling stocks trump cheap money all day long, and if earnings are collapsing because of the trade war (which they are), even negative interest rates from the Fed wouldn’t support the market. I have a feeling that’s what we’re rolling into this summer.
Q: What is your target for the bond on the upside and the downside on yield?
A: My immediate target is $133 on the (TLT). That’s where I might entertain a short position, but even then, it would be something very cautious like the June $137-$140 vertical bear put spread. And my downside yield target is 2.05%—that’s only 15 basis points away, or three full points in the (TLT). So, we’re getting close to the most extreme upside targets in the bond market.
Q: Would you buy the ProShares Ultra Short S&P 500 ETF (SDS)?
A: Yes, but only on a rally—now would be a terrible time. We could get a rally into the month's end on Friday. If we do, selling the close or buying the -2X inverse bear (SDS) would be a good idea. If the (SPX) recovers one third of its recent loss, or 65 points from yesterday’s low, that would be a good entry point on the short side. Up two-thirds and you double up. Above that and you’re wrong.
Q: Copper producer Freeport McMoRan (FCX) is lagging again; is it time to buy?
A: No, FCX is getting slaughtered by collapsing copper demand from a slowing Chinese economy. You should note that if the Chinese say growth is at 6%, what you’re really looking at is more likely growth of about 3%. These are some of the lowest growth rates China has seen 20-25 years.
Q: CNBC and FOX are claiming today’s drop was caused by the Mueller statement on his report. Do you buy that?
A: No, absolutely not. That’s absolute garbage. The only important or relevant news for me right now is the whole trade war news flow.
Q: I know you’re not crazy about selling naked options, but I just sold 50 X Tesla (TSLA) August $100 puts for $20,000 in premium. I like this trade for income and would gladly own Tesla at a $100 long-term.
A: I would do that trade all day long. The only issue there is whether you have the margin to hold the position like this if you get a move all the way down to say $150 or $125, because margin requirements tend to double and triple when markets start to fall sharply. Sounds like you are a Tesla owner. The S, the X, or the 3?
Q: What is your gut feeling on which trade issues will actually resolve? A: None. The Chinese (FXI) are actually in a very strong position. They would settle for going back to the status quo as of two years ago and nothing else. The U.S. is only 25% of the world economy, and China is still trading with the other 75%; they feel they can withstand the rest of the current presidential term.
Q: Banks are performing terribly—is this a chance to get in?
A: No, banks will continue to perform terribly. We now have an inverted yield curve during which banks basically lose money hand or fist. They’re also being replace by Fintech, which is PayPal (PYPL), Square (SQ), and all the credit card companies. I would much rather own a Visa (V), American Express (AMEX), or Mastercard (MC) than Goldman Sachs (GS), JP Morgan (JPM) or Citibank (C). That’s where the money is going.
Q: Is it time to start adding chip stocks like Nvidia (NVDA), Micron Technology (MU) and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD)?
A: No, this sector really looks like it wants to retest the December lows—chip prices are falling off a cliff, and the Chinese are banning the import of specific American made chips. It’s a major predictor of global recession and victim of the global trade war. Given that companies like Micron get 50% of their business from China, that is not good news. This has the makings of a major meltdown.
Q: Would you put on the same Tesla vertical bull call spread right here? The June $140-$150? A: Yes, I would. Now it’s even lower risk because you have only 17 days left until the June 21 expiration.
Q: When will gold start to perform?
A: I’m not sure. With all the horrible things going on in the world right now, it’s just not happening. I don’t know why, but I think it eventually will. Gold is now trading like a commodity and not a precious metal. It’s tracking perfectly with other commodities like copper (COPX), which have been terrible. I think the market is wrong, but I don’t know when it will turn around.
Q: How can one short the Chinese currency, the yuan?
A: Very simple. The Wisdom Tree Chinese Yuan Strategy Fund (CYB) is the ETF on yuan, so just sell short the (CYB).
Q: If Trump caves on the trade deal, what effect will that have on things?
A: If the cave comes in the form of a treaty-like agreement that gets signed, the market will rally. Presumably, all the 25% punitive tariffs will disappear immediately, and we should have a big resurgence in the economy. Otherwise, it will continue to weaken. We need a Chinese trade deal to pull the US economy out of an imminent recession.
Q: What happens to the pound (FXB) in a hard Brexit?
A: If there is a “No Deal”, Brexit the United Kingdom would be committing economic suicide. It would gain no preferential tariffs outside the European Community. In that case, the pound goes to parity against the dollar, or 1:1. The last time that happened in 1984, I bought a mansion in London next door to Jacob Rothschild for $500,000. Today it is worth $20 million. Maybe you should do the same.
Q: Is it a good time to invest in rare earth metals?
A: Yes, but the second the trade war ends, those things are going to collapse. And as we’ve learned during the last 8-year bear market in the rare earths, liquidity is terrible on the down side. Take a look at the Van Eck Vectors rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). It was issued at the top of the last bubble and is up 15.67% since the trade war escalated.
Good luck and Good trading
John Thomas
CEO & Publisher
The Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader
"I think this is about Russia reasserting itself on the international stage, basically saying that Russia is back and is a force to be reckoned with. I think we underestimated for a long time the extent of the humiliation that Russians felt after the collapse of the Soviet Union," said former Secretary of Defense and CIA head Robert M. Gates.
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Putin-quote-of-the-day-photo-e1523310805636.jpg188250MHFTRhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMHFTR2019-05-31 01:00:342019-05-30 15:09:11May 31, 2019 - Quote of the Day
This is the Mad Hedge Technology Letter finding you the best technology recommendations and sometimes, they come from unpredictable sources.
Retail and the digitization of this industry has made this area one of the biggest recipients of technology through the e-commerce portals such as Amazon (AMZN) and its competitors.
I have gone on record saying that Walmart is the next FANG and I do stand by that assertion.
Another company nipping at the heels of Walmart (WMT) and vying to become the next tech gamechanger is Target.
Target (TGT) has made all the right moves in all the right places by hyper digitizing their own operations, so much so, that it has morphed straight into the firing line of Silicon Valley and its commercial interests.
The first quarter marked Target’s eighth consecutive quarter of comparable sales increases.
Comparable sales growth of 4.8% exceeded even the most outlandish expectations.
There has been a positive response to Target’s same-day digital fulfillment services which was a response in large part to their competitor Amazon.
The fulfillment operations drove well over half of digital sales growth in the quarter.
The crucial ability to offer these same-day services, which delivers customers a high level of satisfaction, is a result of a carefully orchestrated strategy to put stores in the center of fulfillment.
In fact, Target stores handled more than 80% of the first quarter digital volume, including all of the same-day options combined with digital orders shipped directly from stores to guests’ homes.
The first quarter performance was also stronger than expected, up against an expectation for a rate decline, operating margins increased about 20 basis points in the quarter.
This performance reflected the precision of disciplined expense control tied with a favorable mix of digital fulfillment meaning that first quarter earnings per share grew more than 15% at the top end of the guidance range.
The clear outperformance occurred from multiple drivers, including strong holiday performance in the Valentine's Day and Easter periods, along with the powerful everyday traffic in the Food, Beverage, and Essential categories.
Target’s customers are responding passionately, driving rapid growth of the same-day options, including Drive-Up, and in-store pickup.
Perusing recent results, last year’s tariffs passed with minimal carnage and Target has put in motion contingency plans this time around to mitigate the impact of additional tariffs already scheduled for next month.
The China trade war does pose a serious potential drag on margins, and if e-commerce gets hit with higher cost of goods, then not only will Target feel the torture, but so will the likes of Amazon and Walmart.
Geopolitical risk is the main burden holding back the broad market, and the price action has reflected the increasing risk that the trade war will destroy earnings growth and become a strong catalyst for an equity reset.
This is the main reason why I cannot say with utter conviction to buy the company today.
In a top down world, the issues at the top take precedent and investors must absorb this.
Ultimately, Target’s growth strategy entails building and rolling out a comprehensive set of digital fulfillment capabilities, allowing them to provide customers with a convenient fulfillment option for every shopping journey.
As a result of those efforts, Target now offers more digital fulfillment options across more of the country than anyone else in retail.
When customers are planning on being out and about, they can shop on their digital device and Target is able to deliver their order in an hour or two.
Target offers in-store pickup in every one of the 1,851 locations, and Target even walks the order out to the parking lot in more than 1,250 stores.
There are no fees for either of the same-day options.
Shipt, the same-day grocery delivery service acquired by Target last year, offers unlimited free same-day delivery from Target and more than 50 other retailers across the country for $99 annual fee.
A portion of Target’s digital orders are and will continue to be shipped from upstream fulfillment centers. And other items will continue to be shipped directly by other vendors.
Target has effectively transitioned into the Amazon style fulfillment center strategy based on speed and scale.
Target is on track to grow digital sales by more than $1 billion in 2019 and fulfilling even higher percentages of this volume from in-house stores.
Using stores as digital hubs enhances Target’s speed and reduces cost, and importantly, moving to store fulfillment does not increase the frequency of split shipments.
In fact, even though store fulfillment continues to grow rapidly, the rate of split shipments this year is running lower both in Target stores and in total compared with last year.
This allowed management to enhance customers experience which can be seen by repeat business.
There are essentially only three e-commerce companies that have taken full advantage arming themselves with a wicked fulfillment center operation – Amazon, Walmart, and Target.
Other retailers that either do not have the capital to scale, and the resources to digitize will continue to lose business because they simply can’t provide the same quality of customer experience these trio offer.
The financials reflect the great success Target is experiencing today.
Over the last 2 years, earnings results have beaten EPS estimates 63% of the time and have beaten revenue estimates 88% of the time.
Target has taken some apparel market share away from the mall group with comp sales up 4.8% when consensus was 4.2%.
Digital sales were up 42% year-over-year in Q1 signaling that the success or failure of digitizing a business is the x-factor in 2019.
That trend could perpetuate this summer, with Target executives convinced today that the company's brand-new partnership with Vineyard Vines is already one of the most successful in its history.
Digital purchases that originate online now represent 7.1% of Target’s total transactions, up from 5.2% a year ago showing how the digital business is making even deeper inroads each year.
Total revenue was up 5% to $17.63 billion from $16.78 billion last year, smashing estimates of $17.52 billion.
These three e-commerce companies will be the ones standing when the dust settles, and unluckily, there will be some periods when geopolitics and other macroeconomic issues overwhelm the individual stock story.
All else being equal, Target is a smart long-term hold and this firm is in the first innings of a massive digital transformation.
I am confident they will overdeliver on the rest of their annual financial targets.
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2019-05-30 09:02:452019-07-11 13:01:39Is Target the Next FANG?
“If you go back to 1800, everybody was poor. I mean everybody. The Industrial Revolution kicked in, and a lot of countries benefited, but by no means everyone.” – Said Founder of Microsoft Bill Gates
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/bill-gates-1.png385233Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2019-05-30 09:00:482019-07-11 13:01:43May 30, 2019 - Quote of the Day
“The car business is hell,” said founder Elon Musk when announcing he would sleep in the Fremont Tesla factory until Model S production reached 2,500 units a week.
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/tesla.png331443Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2019-05-30 01:00:252019-05-29 19:38:00May 30, 2019 - Quote of the Day
(WEDNESDAY, JULY 10 BUDAPEST, HUNGARY STRATEGY LUNCHEON)
(ONSHORING TAKES ANOTHER GREAT LEAP FORWARD),
(TSLA), (UMX), (EWW), (KISS THAT UNION JOB GOODBYE),
Have you tried to hire a sewing machine operator lately?
I haven’t, but I have friends running major apparel companies who have (where do you think I get all those tight-fitting jeans?).
Guess what? There aren’t any to be had.
Since 1990, some 77% of the American textile workforce has been lost, when China joined the world economy in force, and the offshoring trend took flight.
Now that manufacturing is, at last, coming home, the race is on to find the workers to man it.
Welcome to onshoring 2.0.
The development has been prompted by several seemingly unrelated events.
There is an ongoing backlash to several disasters at garment makers in Bangladesh, the current low-cost producer which have killed thousands.
Today’s young consumers want to look cool but have a clean conscience as well. That doesn’t happen when your threads are sewn together by child slave laborers working for $1 a day.
Several firms are now tapping into the high-end market where the well-off are willingly paying top dollar for a well-made “Made in America” label.
Look no further than 7 For All Mankind, which is offering just such a product at a discount to all recent buyers of the Tesla Model S-1 (TSLA), that other great all-American manufacturer.
As a result, wages for cut-and-sew jobs are now among the fastest growing in the country, up 13.2% in real terms since 2007, versus a paltry 1.4% for the industry as a whole.
Apparel industry recruiters are plastering high schools and church communities with flyers in their desperate quest for new workers.
They advertise in languages with high proportions of blue-collar workers, such as Spanish, Somali, and Hmong.
New immigrants are particularly being targeted. And yes, they are resorting to the technology that originally hollowed out their industry, creating websites to suck in new applicants.
Chinese workers now earn $3 an hour versus $9 plus benefits at the lowest paying U.S. factories.
But the extra cost is more than made up for by savings in transportation and logistics, and the rapid time to market.
That is a crucial advantage in today’s fast-paced, high-turnover fashion world. Some companies are even returning to the hiring practices of the past, offering free training programs and paid internships.
By now, we have all become experts in offshoring, the practice whereby American companies relocate manufacturing jobs overseas to take advantage of low wages, missing unions, the lack of regulation, and the paucity of environmental controls.
The strategy has been by far the largest source of new profits enjoyed by big companies for the past two decades.
It has also been blamed for losses of U.S. jobs, with some estimates reaching as high as 25 million.
When offshoring first started 50 years ago, it was a total no-brainer.
Wages were sometimes 95% cheaper than those at home. The cost savings were so great that you could amortize your total capital costs in as little as two years.
So American electronics makers began filing overseas to Singapore, Thailand, Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea, and the Philippines.
After the U.S. normalized relations with China in 1978, the action moved there and found that labor was even cheaper.
Then, a funny thing happened. After 30 years of falling real American wages and soaring Chinese wages, offshoring isn’t such a great deal anymore. The average Chinese laborer earned $100 a year in 1977.
Today, it is $6,000, and $26,000 for trained technicians, with total compensation still rising 20% a year. At this rate, U.S. and Chinese wages will reach parity in about 10 years.
But wages won’t have to reach parity for onshoring to accelerate in a meaningful way. Investing in China is still not without risks.
Managing a global supply chain is no piece of cake on a good day. Asian countries still lack much of the infrastructure that we take for granted here.
Natural disasters such as earthquakes, fires, and tidal waves can have a hugely disruptive impact on a manufacturing system that is in effect a highly tuned, incredibly complex watch.
There are also far larger political risks keeping a chunk of our manufacturing base in the Middle Kingdom than most Americans realize. With the U.S. fleet and the Chinese military playing an endless game of chicken off the coast, we are one midair collision away from a major diplomatic incident.
Protectionism constantly threatens to boil over in the U.S., whether it is over the dumping of chicken feet, tires, or the latest, solar cells.
This is what the visit to the Foxconn factory by Apple’s CEO Tim Cook was all about. Be nice to the workers there, let them work only 8 hours a day instead of 16, let them unionize, and guess what?
Work will come back to the U.S. all the faster. The Chinese press was ripe with speculation that Apple-induced reforms might spread to the rest of the country like wildfire.
The late General Motors (GM) CEO Dan Adkerson once told me his company was reconsidering its global production strategy in the wake of the Thai floods.
Which car company was most impacted by the Japanese tsunami? General Motors, which obtained a large portion of its transmissions there.
The impact of a real onshoring move on the U.S. economy would be huge. Some economists estimate that as many as 10% to 30% of the jobs lost to offshoring could return.
At the high end, this could amount to 8 million jobs. That would cut our unemployment rate down by half, at least.
It would add $20 billion to $60 billion in GDP per year or up to 0.4% in economic growth per year.
It would also lead to a much stronger dollar, rising stocks, and lower bond prices. Is this what the stock market is trying to tell us by failing to have any meaningful correction for the past 2 ½ years?
Who would be the biggest beneficiaries of an onshoring trend? Si! Ole! Mexico (UMX) (EWW), which took the biggest hit when China started soaking up all the low-wage jobs in the world.
After that, the industrial Midwest has to figure pretty large, especially gutted Michigan. With real estate prices there under their 1992 lows, if there is a market at all, you know that doing business there costs a fraction of what it did 20 years ago.
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/worker.png214322MHFTRhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMHFTR2019-05-29 01:04:232019-07-09 03:41:36Onshoring Takes Another Great Leap Forward
Legal Disclaimer
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.
We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
Essential Website Cookies
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
Google Analytics Cookies
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visist to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
Other external services
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.