“I love museums but I don't want to live in one.” – Said current CEO of Apple Tim Cook
“I love museums but I don't want to live in one.” – Said current CEO of Apple Tim Cook
Global Market Comments
July 1, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(FRIDAY, JULY 5 CAIRO, EGYPT STRATEGY DINNER)
(OPTIONS FOR THE BEGINNER),
(CHINA’S COMING DEMOGRAPHIC NIGHTMARE)
Come join me for dinner at the Mad Hedge Fund Trader’s Global Strategy Dinner which I will be conducting in Cairo, Egypt on Friday, July 5, 2019 at 7:00 PM.
An excellent meal will be followed by a wide-ranging discussion and a question-and-answer period. I’ll be giving you my up to date view on stocks, bonds, currencies, commodities, precious metals, energy, and real estate.
I also hope to provide some insight into America’s opaque and confusing political system. And to keep you in suspense, I’ll be throwing a few surprises out there too.
Tickets are available for $238.
The dinner will be held at an exclusive hotel in downtown Cairo on the Nile River, the location of which will be emailed with your purchase confirmation.
I look forward to meeting you and thank you for supporting my research. To purchase tickets for this dinner, please click here.
I strongly urge readers of this letter to log on to Amazon and buy a copy of Options for the Beginner and Beyond by W. Edward Olmstead.
Options contracts offer investors a wonderful instrument for minimizing risk while maximizing the upside, and I am going to recommend many more such strategies in the future.
So, if you want to have the slightest idea of what I am talking about, get yourself some grounding in this important field by reading this book.
You don’t have to be a math genius to figure this stuff out, and the risk reward benefits are great.
Olmstead, a math professor at Northwestern University, starts out with a basic Options 101 course going into the merits of puts and calls.
He catalogues the exchanges where they are listed and the vast number of products that can be traded including stocks, bonds, commodities, currencies, and precious metals.
He goes into the mundane but important details on the administration side of things, such as settlements.
For the more technically inclined, he launches into options theory pricing, and goes into the origins and utility of the Black-Scholes equation.
We learn about the arcane world of what traders call “the Greeks”, the Deltas, Thetas, and Vegas of individual positions. He then launches into basic option strategies like call and put spreads, ratios, straddles, strangles, collars, and condors.
Don’t let these terms scare you off. It is really much easier than it sounds. In fact, you will be kicking yourself once you find out how easy it is.
In order to buy the book at a discounted price and give yourself a genuine trading edge, just click here.
Quote of the Day
"A lasting relationship with a woman is only possible if you are a business failure," said John Paul Getty, a Morgan Stanley billionaire client who was married five times.
While the Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader focuses on investment over a one week to a six-month time frame, Mad Day Trader, provided by Bill Davis, will exploit money-making opportunities over a brief ten minute to three-day window. It is ideally suited for day traders, but can also be used by long-term investors to improve market timing for entry and exit points. Read more
Global Market Comments
June 28, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(TUESDAY, JULY 2 NEW DELHI, INDIA STRATEGY LUNCHEON)
(TAKE A LEAP INTO LEAPS), (AAPL)
(TESTIMONIAL)
Come join me for lunch at the Mad Hedge Fund Trader’s Global Strategy Luncheon which I will be conducting in New Delhi, India on Tuesday, July 2, 2019 at 12:30 PM.
An excellent meal will be followed by a wide-ranging discussion and a question-and-answer period. I’ll be giving you my up to date view on stocks, bonds, currencies, commodities, precious metals, energy, and real estate.
I also hope to provide some insight into America’s opaque and confusing political system. And to keep you in suspense, I’ll be throwing a few surprises out there too.
Tickets are available for $237.
The lunch will be held at an exclusive hotel in downtown New Delhi, the location of which will be emailed with your purchase confirmation.
I look forward to meeting you and thank you for supporting my research.
To purchase tickets for this luncheon, please click here.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
June 28, 2019
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(THE PATH TO THE HOLY GRAIL)
(UBER), (LYFT)
The pieces are starting to fall together.
This is what Lyft and Uber were hellbent on and they will finally get their cake and eat it too.
At least one of them will.
The holy grail of Lyft and Uber is eliminating the human element to the business.
Phoenix, Arizona is the first site for Lyft’s app collaborating with Waymo’s technology to offer autonomous rides via Lyft’s platform.
This could be the beginning of the end for Uber if Lyft meaningfully pulls ahead.
Why is the human element a roadblock?
Humans complain, get sick, file lawsuits for a lack of benefits, and humans post exposes on companies running amok.
Doing away with that will not only rid Lyft and Uber of high-risk liabilities, but it will boost profitability to the point where these companies will be healthily in the green.
Uber riders were only on the hook for 41% of the actual cost of transportation in 2016, the rest was comprised of generous subsidies making up part of the payments to the driver on top of the driver’s wage.
Let me put this in perspective. Lyft made $2.2 billion in revenue last year according to the filing for their IPO, and they lost $900 million from servicing this revenue.
Everybody knows that the gig economy is just a stop-gap measure until tech companies can go full on autonomous and direct operations with one click of a button buttressed by an all-terrain algorithm.
If you thought Uber was a tad better, then you were wrong. Operating losses of $3 billion on $11.8 billion in revenue and a total debt on $8 billion is tough to stomach.
If Lyft were finally able to remove the subsidies because of cost associated with human drivers and then kick the driver to the curb, margins would explode by around 50%.
Being a public company now, the competition will rise to a fever pitch.
The first to remove the driver is effectively an existential dilemma for both companies and I believe Lyft partnering with best in class Waymo will give them the upper hand.
Giving the keys to a vaunted FANG to supercharge your business isn’t a bad idea.
And remember, if you short Lyft, you are betting against Alphabet engineers who have made Waymo into the best in show.
You could do a lot worse.
And it could so happen that Lyft might even tap more Alphabet expertise to hypercharge its business.
It’s definitely not in the realm of fantasy and I already know that Lyft is receiving substantial help from Google ad.
Pre-IPO days were all about jockeying for market share to see who could grab the most volume and now the battle stands with Lyft holding 34% of the market with Uber pocketing with the rest.
Uber has relinquished much of their dominance after bleeding users stemming from bad management decisions.
Now the pendulum is swinging towards the big question of how soon will these companies be profitable?
Luckily for Uber and Lyft, future trends are quite favorable, with data showing that by 2040, 33 million of the vehicles sold annually will be fully autonomous.
Nearly every automaker is developing self-driving systems right now, and semi-autonomous features such as automatic braking, lane-keep assist, adaptive cruise control already are complementary in new vehicles.
Now the game is to continue the subsidies in order to tighten market share but integrate autonomous cars into the business model as fast as possible.
This is all about execution and the management behind the reigns.
By doing this, Lyft and Uber will reduce its expenses and finally become profitable, it would almost be akin to if Spotify stopped paying for music royalties.
Lyft has set the first cone on the floor and I found it interesting that it was Lyft and not Uber.
When we peel back the layers, investors must understand that Alphabet made bets on both Uber and Lyft.
Six years after making what at the time was its largest venture investment ever, Google's $258 million bet on Uber has multiplied by about 20-fold to be worth more than $5 billion.
But it’s not about the appreciating assets that matter the most.
Alphabet knows that one of these platforms will dominate in the end and want to benefit from it either way.
CapitalG, the late stage investing arm of Alphabet, has almost tripled the value of its investment in Lyft at today’s prices after investing $500 million in Lyft in October 2017.
Alphabet has its fingerprints all over Uber and Lyft at this point with not only supplying the map that is displayed on these platforms through Google maps but also leading the marketing operation infusing its best of breed ad tech into these platforms.
It’s obvious that Alphabet has covered its bases with the autonomous transport services and whether its Lyft or Uber that wins out, Waymo taking the initiative to partner with these platforms will make Alphabet the clear winner.
Lyft has all its eggs in one basket with a domestic transportation app while Uber has different interests which could be dragging them away from the autonomous driving opportunity.
Uber did have major setbacks after their technology was the fault of several fatalities.
The first-mover advantage is the key to seizing the bulk of the market.
I am interested to see when Uber will partner with autonomous technology, but for the moment they aren’t because they are developing their own self-driving tech.
This is a risky strategy because Lyft has understood its shortcomings and paid heed to the more sophisticated technology being Waymo and is now actively partnering with them.
They probably understood that they would never be able to beat Waymo.
This unit started off shrouded in secrecy in 2008, a full 5-years before anyone moved a finger of autonomous driving.
Uber is developing its own autonomous fleet which in theory could become a larger business than Waymo and Lyft, but they are battling a company who had a 7-year start and the result of that is Uber trying to shortcut to the top resulting in its technology getting sidelined.
Uber’s self-driving unit is in the bad graces of safety regulators and I would only give Uber a 15% chance of usurping the leader Waymo.
To this point, I believe Lyft will be the main transport app for Waymo in the future, and Waymo having the highest chance to be rolled out nationally.
This is incredibly bullish for Lyft and Alphabet.
Uber still isn’t on the radar with its self-driving technology and being a frenemy in this sense with Alphabet will hurt Uber.
If Alphabet cashes out on its Uber shares, not only could they earn a hefty profit, but it would signal that Lyft will be their main transport app for autonomous driving and Uber has lost out on self-driving technology.
I am now bullish on Lyft and neutral on Uber but waiting on how Uber responds to this massive leg up by Lyft.
Legal Disclaimer
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.
