My former employer, The Economist, once the ever tolerant editor of my flabby, disjointed, and juvenile prose (Thanks Peter and Marjorie), has released its new ?Big Mac? index of international currency valuations.
Although initially launched as a joke three decades ago, I have followed it religiously and found it an amazingly accurate predictor of future economic success.
The index counts the cost of McDonald?s (MCD) premium sandwich around the world.
I can personal confirm the top end of the index in Switzerland at $6.59 for a Big Mac. This is the price of the sandwich only, not of the full meal including cholesterol loaded French fries and a sugar and caffeine laden drink.
In Basel, Zermatt, and Geneva I dashed into shops to check prices, but didn?t buy anything. The staff there must have thought I was ?MAD,? while my traveling companions were deeply annoyed.
In fact, my doctors banned me from this heart attack on a plate years ago.
The bottom end of the Index can be found in Malaysia, where the median annual salary of only $4,500 can justify a price no higher than $1.99. There is also a cultural preference for chicken products in this Islamic country.
What are the Index's conclusions today?
The Swiss franc (FXF), the Norwegian krone, the Swedish krona, and, and the Euro (FXE) are overvalued, while the Hong Kong dollar, the Chinese Yuan (CYB), and the Thai Baht are cheap.
The US dollar (UUP) is now at the highish end of the range.
I couldn?t agree more with many of these conclusions. It?s as if the august weekly publication was tapping The Diary of the Mad Hedge Fund Trader for ideas.
I only learned last week that McDonald?s is removing high fructose corn syrup from its hamburgers. I never knew it was in there!
Still, it points to the company?s determination to move forward with healthier alternatives, as is the rest of the entire food industry.
That may partially explain the outsized performance of the shares over the past year, up 40.52%.
I am no longer the frequent consumer of Big Macs that I once was, as at my advanced age, my metabolism has slowed to such an extent that in eating one, I might as well tape it to my ass.
Price rises also haven?t helped. When my mom took her seven kids to the Golden Arches during the 1950?s, the hamburgers were ten cents apiece.
Better to use it as an economic forecasting tool than a speedy lunch.
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/McDonalds-China-e1470951249636.jpg300400DougDhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngDougD2016-08-12 01:06:402016-08-12 01:06:40An Update to The Economist ?Big Mac? Foreign Exchange Index
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Roller-Coaster-e1429621869250.jpg166300Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2016-08-12 01:05:352016-08-12 01:05:35August 12, 2016 - Quote of the Day
Featured Trade: (OCTOBER 7th INCLINE VILLAGE, NEVADA GLOBAL STRATEGY LUNCHEON), (TIME TO ROTATE FROM DEFENSIVES TO CYCLICALS), (T), (DUK), (SPG), (CAT), (X), (GE), (BAC), (TLT), (A VERY BRIGHT SPOT IN REAL ESTATE), (A SHORT HISTORY OF HEDGE FUNDS)
AT&T, Inc. (T) Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) Simon Property Group Inc. (SPG) Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) United States Steel Corp. (X) General Electric Company (GE) Bank of America Corporation (BAC) iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond (TLT)
As difficult as this may be to believe, we have had a defensive, ?RISK OFF? stock market for most of 2016.
It is even more incredulous, given that we tickled new all time highs for the major stock indexes only a couple of days ago.
However, after reviewing hundreds of charts, it is increasingly becoming clear that we may be seeing a sea change in sector preferences by investment advisors and money managers.
Get this one right and you will dominate the performance league tables and get more than a subscription to the ?Jelly of the Month? club from your clients at Christmas.
Miss it, and you will soon find yourself washing windshields at the nearest intersection, competing with the homeless.
To paraphrase ?Game of Thrones?, ?Winter is Going.?
It looks like the parting of the ways started in July when I was lost somewhere on the Italian railway system.
After being shunned all year, cyclicals have suddenly become the flavor of the day.
These would include major old line industrial companies like General Electric (GE) (2.94% yield), US Steel (X), (0.77% yield), and Caterpillar (CAT) (3.69% yield).
They also include financials (BAC) (1.98% yield), which have been beaten like a red headed stepchild because of the deleterious effect falling interest rates have on their P&L?s.
There are many possible reasons for the switch.
The defensive sectors that have led the market all year, like telecoms, utilities, and REIT?s, have been pursued in a relentless reach for yield. The driver here was a global collapse in interest rates across the yield curve.
A 1.33% yield on the ten-year Treasury (TLT), the low seen so far this year, covers a multitude of sins.
On this bandwagon were shares like AT&T (T) (4.47% yield), Duke Energy (DUK) (4.04% yield), and Simon Growth Properties (SPG) (3.00% yield).
The logic employed by many fund managers is to simply sell your winners and rotate into the losers.
If you are early, just let the dividends pay you some cash flow. If you aren?t, just keep scaling into rising prices.
As these sectors have lagged the market for some time, the downside risk is limited. This is no small consideration for a market that is at a seven year, all time high.
There is a growing belief that the second half will generate stronger US economic growth than the first half.
Massive and expanding quantitative easing in Europe and Asia is working it's magic, and will reduce the drag these economies have had on ours at home. Britain?s ten-year gilts just plunged to a record low 0.52% yield today.
Finally, there is that damn election. The outcome is no longer an unknown. Clinton leads by up to 15 points in the national polls and 90:10 in the betting pools.
No candidate in history has made up such a deficit with less than three months until Election Day.
The only unknown here is whether the Democrats grab the House of Representatives in addition to the Senate. The House is so gerrymandered; it is impossible to make a definitive call.
Clinton needs a minimum of 57% of the vote to pull off the trifecta. With Trump digging himself into a deeper hole daily, she may pull it off.
The financial markets are cheering this outcome. This is why we ran up to new highs ahead of my own schedule.
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Charlie-Chaplin-e1479171394321.jpg186400DougDhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngDougD2016-08-11 01:08:472016-08-11 01:08:47Time to Rotate from Defensives to Cyclicals
Legendary Fortune Magazine editor, Winslow Jones, created the first hedge fund out of a shabby office on Broadway Avenue in New York City in 1948, and generated monster returns over the next 20 years.
He got the idea of a 20% performance bonus, now an industry standard, from ancient Phoenician sea captains who kept a fifth of the profits from successful voyages. Jones must have had a historical bent.
Then came the second generation titans, George Soros, Julian Robertson, and Michael Steinhardt, who made their debut in the sixties.
I count myself among the third generation along with Paul Tudor Jones and Louis Bacon, who launched funds in the late eighties, when there were still fewer than 200 funds and $25 million was considered a lot of money.
The really big money showed up in the nineties when the pension funds found them.
After that, we suffered through the many ordeals that followed, including the collapse of Long Term Capital in 1998, the Amaranth blow up in natural gas in 2006, the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy in 2008, and John Paulson?s hair raising 50% draw down in 2011.
Today there are over 7,000 hedge funds, thought to manage some $2.73 trillion, which dominate all financial markets.
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Money-Arms-Full.jpg248269DougDhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngDougD2016-08-11 01:06:212016-08-11 01:06:21A Short History of Hedge Funds
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Empty-Pockets.jpg194272DougDhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngDougD2016-08-11 01:05:482016-08-11 01:05:48August 11, 2016 - Quote of the Day
Featured Trade: (WHY THE BULL MARKET IS ALIVE AND WELL), (FB), (IBB), (TSLA), (BAC), (JPM), (NFLX), (LEN), (THE RECEPTION THAT THE STARS FELL UPON)
Facebook, Inc. (FB) iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology (IBB) Tesla Motors, Inc. (TSLA) Bank of America Corporation (BAC) JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) Lennar Corporation (LEN)
Fall is approaching, when my most loyal subscribers are to be found taking transcontinental railroad journeys, crossing the Atlantic in a first class suite on the Queen Mary 2, or getting the early jump on the Caribbean beaches.
What better time to spend your trading profits than after all the kids have gone back to school, the summer vacation destination crush has subsided, and travel deals abound.
It?s an empty nester's paradise.
Trading in the stock market is reflecting as much, with an increasingly narrowing range since the S&P 500 hit a new all time high in mid-July.
Is it really August already?
It?s as if through some weird, Rod Serling type time flip, June became August, when we usually get our half year low, thanks to the ill conceived Brexit.
Welcome to the misplaced summer market.
I say all this, because the longer the market moves sideways, the more investors get nervous and start bailing on their overweight cash positions.
Call it FOMO: the Fear of Missing Out.
The perma bears are always out there in force (it sells more newsletters), and with the memories of the 2008 crash still fresh and painful, the fears of a sudden market meltdown are constant and ever present.
In the minds of many newly gun-shy traders, the next 1,000 point flash crash is only an opening away.
Only a short position in the Japanese yen (FXY) seems to be working today, which followers of my Trade Alert Service have in abundance.
In fact, nothing could be further from the truth.
What we are seeing unfold here is not the PRICE correction that people are used to, but a TIME correction, where the averages move sideways for a while.
Eventually, the moving averages catch up, and it is off to the races once again.
The reality is that there is a far greater risk of an impending market MELT UP IN STOCK PRICES than a melt down. But to understand why, we must delve further into history, and then the fundamentals.
For a start, many investors have not believed in this bull market for a nanosecond from the very beginning. They have been pouring their new cash into the bond market instead. The ultra low yields prove my point.
Some 95% of active managers are underperforming their benchmark indexes this year, the lowest level since 1997, compared to only 76% in a normal year.
Therefore, this stock market has ?CHASE? written all over it.
Too many managers have only four months left to make their years, lest they spend 2017 driving a taxi for Uber and handing out free bottles of water, or subleasing their homes through Airbnb.
The rest of 2016 will be one giant ?beta? (outperformance) chase.
You can?t blame these guys for being scared. My late mentor, Morgan Stanley?s money management guru Barton Biggs, taught me that bull markets climb a never-ending wall of worry.
And what a wall it has been.
Worry has certainly been in abundance this year, what with China confusing at best, ISIS on the loose, Syria exploding, Iraq falling to pieces, the contentious presidential elections looming, oil in free fall again, the worst summer fires in decades, flaccid economic growth, and even a rampaging Donald Trump.
We also have to be concerned that my former Berkeley professor, Fed governor Janet Yellen, is going to unsheathe a giant sword and start hacking away at bond prices, as she has already done with quantitative easing (I?ve been watching Game of Thrones too much).
Let me give you a little personal insight here into the thinking of Janet Yellen. It?s all about the jobs. Any hints about rate rises have been head fakes, especially when they come from a small, anti QE Fed minority.
When in doubt, Janet is all about easy money, until proven otherwise. Until then, think lower rates for longer, even on the heels of the blockbuster 255,000 July nonfarm payroll.
So I think we have a nice set up here going into Q4. It could be a Q4 2015 lite-- a gain of 5% in a cloud of dust.
The sector leaders will be the usual suspects, big technology names, health care, and biotech (IBB). Banks (BAC), (JPM), (KBE) will get a steroid shot as the new value plays.
To add some spice to your portfolio (perhaps at the cost of some sleepless nights), you can dally in some big momentum names, like Tesla (TSLA), Netflix (NFLX), Lennar Housing (LEN), and Facebook (FB).
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/John-at-Ship-Steering-Wheel-e1470707345318.jpg400389DougDhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngDougD2016-08-09 01:07:422016-08-09 01:07:42Why the Bull Market is Alive and Well
While we?re all sitting on our hands waiting for Janet Yellen to make her move, or non move, it is time to reminisce.
My friend was having a hard time finding someone to attend a reception who was knowledgeable about financial markets, White House intrigue, international politics, and nuclear weapons.
I asked who was coming. She said Reagan?s Treasury Secretary George Shultz, Clinton?s Defense Secretary William Perry, and Senate Armed Services Chairman Sam Nunn.
I said I?d be there wearing my darkest suit, cleanest shirt, and would be on my best behavior, to boot.
When I arrived at San Francisco?s Mark Hopkins Hotel, I was expecting the usual mob scene. I was shocked when I saw the three senior statesmen making small talk with their wives and a handful of others.
It was a rare opportunity to grill high level officials on a range of top secret issues that I would have killed for during my days as a journalist for The Economist magazine. I guess arms control is not exactly a hot button issue these days. I moved in for the kill.
I have known George Shultz for decades, back when he was the CEO of the San Francisco based heavy engineering company, Bechtel Corp in the 1970's. I saluted him as ?Captain Schultz?, his WWII Marine Corp rank, which has been our inside joke for years.
Since the Marine Corps didn?t know what to do with a PhD in economics from MIT, they put him in charge of an anti-aircraft unit in the South Pacific, as he already was familiar with ballistics, trajectories, and apogees.
I asked him why Reagan was so obsessed with Nicaragua, and if he really believed that if we didn?t fight them there, we would be fighting them in the streets of Los Angeles.
He replied that the socialist regime had granted the Soviets bases for listening posts that would be used to monitor US West Coast military movements in exchange for free arms supplies. Closing those bases was the true motivation for the entire Nicaragua policy.
To his credit, George was the only senior official to threaten resignation when he learned of the Iran-contra scandal.
I asked his reaction when he met Soviet premier Mikhail Gorbachev in Reykjavik in 1986 when he proposed total nuclear disarmament.
Shultz said he knew the breakthrough was coming because the KGB analyzed a Reagan speech in which he had made just such a proposal.
Reagan had in fact pursued this as a lifetime goal, wanting to return the world to the pre nuclear age he knew in the 1930?s, although he never mentioned this in any election campaign.
As a result of the Reykjavik Treaty, the number of nuclear warheads in the world has dropped from 70,000 to under 10,000. The Soviets then sold their excess plutonium to the US, which today generates 20% of the total US electric power generation.
Shultz argued that nuclear weapons were not all they were cracked up to be. Despite the US being armed to the teeth, they did nothing to stop the invasions of Korea, Hungary, Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Kuwait.
I had not met Bob Perry since the late nineties when I bumped into his delegation at Tokyo?s Okura Hotel during defense negotiations with the Japanese. He told me that the world was far closer to an accidental Armageddon than people realized.
Twice during his term as Defense Secretary he was awoken in the middle of the night by officers at the NORAD early warning system to be told that there were 200 nuclear missiles inbound from the Soviet Union.
He was given five minutes to recommend to the president to launch a counterstrike. Four minutes later, they called back to tell him that there were no missiles, that it was just a computer glitch.
When the US bombed Belgrade in 1999, Russian president, Boris Yeltsin, in a drunken rage, ordered a full-scale nuclear alert, which would have triggered an immediate American counter response. Fortunately, his generals ignored him.
Perry said the only reason that Israel hadn?t attacked Iran yet, was because the US was making aggressive efforts to collapse the economy there with its oil embargo.
Enlisting the aid of Russia and China was key, but difficult since Iran is a major weapons buyer from these two countries.
His argument was that the economic shock that a serious crisis would bring would damage their economies more than any benefits they could hope to gain from their existing Iranian trade.
I told Perry that I doubted Iran had the depth of engineering talent needed to run a full scale nuclear program of any substance.
He said that aid from North Korea and past contributions from the AQ Khan network in Pakistan had helped them address this shortfall.
Ever in search of the profitable trade, I asked Perry if there was an opportunity in nuclear plays, like the Market Vectors Uranium and Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) and Cameco Corp. (CCR), that have been severely beaten down by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
He said there definitely was. In fact, he personally was going to lead efforts to restart the moribund US nuclear industry. The key here is to promote 5th generation technology that uses small, modular designs, and alternative low risk fuels like thorium.
I had never met Senator Sam Nunn and had long been an antagonist, as he played a major role in ramping up the Vietnam War. Thanks to his efforts, the Air Force, at great expense, now has more C-130 Hercules transport planes that it could ever fly because they were assembled in his home state of Georgia. Still, I tried to be diplomatic.
Nunn believes that the most likely nuclear war will occur between India and Pakistan. Islamic terrorists are planning another attack on Mumbai. This time India will retaliate by invading Pakistan. The Pakistanis plan on wiping out this army by dropping an atomic bomb on their own territory, not expecting retaliation in kind.
But India will escalate and go nuclear too. Over 100 million would die from the initial exchange. But when you add in unforeseen factors, like the broader environmental effects and crop failures (CORN), (WEAT), (SOYB), (DBA), that number could rise to 1-2 billion. This could happen as early as 2016.
Nunn applauded current administration efforts to cripple the Iranian economy which has caused their currency to fall 50% in the past two years. The strategy should be continued, even if innocents are hurt.
He argued that further arms control talks with the Russians could be tough. They value these weapons more than we do, because that?s all they have left.
Nunn delivered a stunner in telling me that Warren Buffet had contributed $50 million of his own money to enhance security at nuclear power plants in emerging markets.
I hadn?t heard that.
As the event drew to a close, I returned to Secretary Shultz to grill him some more about the details of the Reykjavik conference held some 30 years ago. He responded with incredible detail about names, numbers, and negotiating postures.
I then asked him how old he was. He said he was 94. I responded ?I want to be like you when I grow up?. He answered that I was ?a promising young man?. It was the best 63th birthday gift I could have received.
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/George-Shultz.jpg313411Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2016-08-09 01:06:212016-08-09 01:06:21The Reception That the Stars Fell Upon
Legal Disclaimer
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.
We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.
Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.
Essential Website Cookies
These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.
Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refuseing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.
We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.
We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.
Google Analytics Cookies
These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.
If you do not want that we track your visist to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:
Other external services
We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.