It was known as the ?Tweet that sank Wall Street.?
When presidential candidate Hillary Clinton attacked the drug industry last summer, the entire pharmaceutical and health care industries were taken out to the woodshed and beaten like the proverbial red headed stepchild (my apologies in advance to red heads).
One of the principal victims was cancer drug maker Celgene (CELG), which dropped some 24.6% from top to bottom.
Never mind that Clinton is unlikely to get what she wants, even if she wins the election.
For that, you need a congress in your pocket, a probability that is at least 5-9 years away.
That is, unless Donald Trump continues his campaign for the Republican nomination.
However, in this nervous, twitchy, gun shy trading environment, it is shoot first and ask questions latter. So Celgene shares sank, whether it was warranted or not.
Celgene is really all about one drug, Revlimid, a blood cancer treatment that accounts for 75% of its sales. Last year, the company sold $7.6 billion worth of this complex molecule.
To wean itself off of its overdependence on a single drug it has embarked on a number of aggressive initiatives.
Since the spring of 2012, it has increased the use of its Abrazane drug to treat late stage pancreatic cancer, the disease that killed Steve Jobs. It has won regulatory approval for the psoriasis drug Otezla.
It has also pursued the mergers and acquisitions road to growth, picking up some two-dozen small drug makers in recent years. The $7.2 billion purchase of Receptos was a big one, which manufactures Ozanimod, a drug used to treat ulcerative colitis and multiple sclerosis.
Celgene also picked up Juno Therapeutics for $1 billion a few months ago, a maker of innovative cellular immunotherapies.
If this ambitious strategy works, Celgene?s net earnings should continue to grow at a 25% annual rate for the next five years. That means the shares should triple by 2020.
This is why the company?s shares command a lofty multiple of 18 times 2016 earnings, the higher end of the range for this industry.
So the next time Hillary opens her mouth, use the dip in (CELG) shares to load the boat. It would also be helpful if stock investors shift their focus from value back to growth.
Looks Like a ?BUY? To Me
Loose Lips Sink Ships
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Hillary-Clinton-e1446065472317.jpg253400Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2015-10-29 01:08:492015-10-29 01:08:49Celgene Will Make a Comeback
I am constantly asked if there are any ways investors can take advantage of the current collapse in natural gas prices.
You don?t want to touch the gas producing companies, like Chesapeake (CHK) and Devon (DVN), because prices for natural gas are probably going to stay down for years.
Good firms that benefit from the increased volume of gas pumped are few and far between. Unless you are a large consumer of this despised molecule, such as an electric power company or a petrochemical plant, it is tough to find a profitable niche.
However, there is one company that delivers a narrow rifle shot that will do extremely well in coming years, and that is Cheniere Energy (LNG).
I first started following (LNG) two decades ago when I was still wildcatting for CH4 in the Texas Barnet Shale.
Back when natural gas was trading at a lofty $5/MBTU, Qatar invested $50 billion in developing its own massive gas resources.
The plan was to liquefy the gas at -256 degrees Fahrenheit in the Middle East, ship it to the US in a fleet of specialized LNG carriers, and have Cheniere convert it back into gas at its Sabine River plant for distribution to an energy hungry US market through the Creole Trail pipeline.
It all looked like a great plan, and (LNG) shares traded up to $45.
Then ?fracking? technology came along and blew up the entire model. The discovery of a new 100-year supply of gas under our feet caused gas prices to crash from a post Amaranth peak of $17/MMBTU down to $2/MMBTU.
Any plans to import LNG from the other side of the world were rendered utterly worthless. Qatar ended up selling its gas to Europe insteadto help offset that continent's over reliance on imports from Russia.
Chenier?s billion-dollar investment in a gasification plant was now worth only so much scrap metal. (LNG) shares plumbed to low single digits as the firm flirted with bankruptcy.
Enter China.
The Middle Kingdom?s voracious demand for energy in this recovery has caused the price of oil (USO) to soar from a 2008 low of $30 to $112.
Despite accounting for an overwhelming share of the world?s new energy purchases, Chinese cities are suffering from brown outs due to power shortages.
This is why China is resisting immense American pressure to quit buying Texas tea from Iran.
Enter the arbitrage. While oil has been plummeting, gas has been falling even more. Gas is now selling at 25% of the cost of oil on an adjusted BTU basis.
Another way of saying this is that you can buy oil for $12 a barrel instead of $48. It only takes a second with an abacus to understand the appeal of such a disparity.
Gas also has the additional benefits in that it is much cleaner burning than crude, lacks the sulfur and nitrogen dioxides, and produces half the carbon dioxide. That?s a big deal in Beijing where the air is so thick you can cut it with a knife on a bad day.
It is also important to know that many states, like California have decided to use natural gas as a bridge fuel until more economic and scalable alternatives are developed.
Enter the long-term contracts. During the 1960?s and 1970?s Japan entered into huge long term contracts to buy LNG from Australia and Indonesia to feed their own economic miracle of the day.
Because it is very expensive and hard to get, offshore supplies were tapped, the price was set at $16/MBTU. Those contracts are now expiring.
Do you think they?ll renew at the old price, or go to Cheniere for the $4 stuff? Gee, let me think about that one for a bit.
Enter Fukushima. The nuclear meltdown on March, 2011 prompted Japan to shut down 49 of 54 nuclear power plants that accounted for 25% of the country?s electric power generation. The brownouts that followed forced a sweltering summer on millions as the government urged consumers to shut off air conditioners to save juice.
Power companies there have been scrambling to obtain conventional energy supplies, and cheap gas supplies from the US would meet this demand nicely.
The trigger.
Cheniere obtained US government permission to export 2.2 billion cubic feet a day for 20 years. That would require it to convert the existing gasification plant to a liquefaction plant, something that can be done with some expensive re-engineering. A second plant is in the approval process.
It has already found several large international buyers to take delivery of the new end product. All that was missing was the money to finish the plant.
My hedge fund buddies have been accumulating this stock when it bottomed at $3, expecting an angel investor to appear. But it was one of those ?someday, it might happen? kind of stories better left to long-term players.
Then Blackstone jumped in with a beefy $2 billion investment in Cheniere. That will enable them to obtain an additional $3 billion in debt financing needed to finish the first of two export facilities. They are now expected to come online in 2016.
How does Cheniere stack up as an investment? Frankly, it is kind of scary. The market cap is only $11.3 billion, it has no earnings yet, and it pays no dividend. When the current spate of deals are done, it will have $5 billion in debt.
I first got followers into (LNG) at $5. We then had a great run all the way up to $85, and we took profits. In the current melt down, it has backed off all the way down to $45, a 47% hickey.
And these facilities are dangerous to operate. One blew up in Texas in 1937 and killed 300 schoolchildren.
As a result, local permits for these are very hard to come by. Anyone who thinks Texas is an unregulated paradise should try drilling for natural gas.
But as you can see a whole host of geopolitical, technology and economic strands reach a nexus in this one company, all of which are extremely positive for the share price.
If the story comes true, as Blackstone hopes, then there could be a double or triple in the shares for the patient. To learn more about Cheniere Energy, please go to their website: http://www.cheniere.com.
Did Somebody Light a Match?
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Destroyed-Town.jpg312510Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2015-10-29 01:07:412015-10-29 01:07:41Revisiting Cheniere Energy (LNG)
(LAST CHANCE TO ATTEND THE FRIDAY, OCTOBER 30 SAN FRANCISCO STRATEGY LUNCHEON),
(GENERAL ELECTRIC?S IMAGINATION REALLY IS AT WORK),
(GE), (ELUXY), (SYF)
(TEN REASONS WHY BONDS WON?T CRASH)
General Electric Company (GE)
Electrolux AB (ELUXY)
Synchrony Financial (SYF)
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2015-10-28 01:09:102015-10-28 01:09:10October 28, 2015
Come join me for lunch at the Mad Hedge Fund Trader?s Global Strategy Update, which I will be conducting in San Francisco on Friday, October 30, 2015. An excellent meal will be followed by a wide ranging discussion and an extended question and answer period.
I?ll be giving you my up to date view on stocks, bonds, currencies, commodities, precious metals, and real estate. And to keep you in suspense, I?ll be throwing a few surprises out there too. Tickets are available for $208.
I?ll be arriving at 11:00 and leaving late in case anyone wants to have a one on one discussion, or just sit around and chew the fat about the financial markets.
The lunch will be held at a private club in downtown San Francisco near Union Square that will be emailed with your purchase confirmation.
I look forward to meeting you, and thank you for supporting my research.
To purchase tickets for the luncheons, please click here.
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/San-Francisco-e1410363065903.jpg238359Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2015-10-28 01:08:272015-10-28 01:08:27Last Chance to Attend the Friday, October 30 San Francisco Strategy Luncheon
There have been two sources of oil information this year.
The producers saw nothing but endless supply stretching over the horizon, and sold every rally with both hands.
The speculators and futures traders have been overwhelmingly positive, buying every dip because their charts told them to, and getting stopped out more times than I have had hot meals.
Clearly, it has been the producers who have been right. That?s because they had to sell to go flat in order to hedge production already in the pipeline. It is much easier to go from long to flat than it is to go from flat to net short.
As a result, there are a lot of oil and commodities traders who are looking for jobs right now on Craig?s List. They?ll probably find them!
And you know what? They?ll probably be right next time.
The stock market certainly thinks so, with energy far and away the best performing sector of the month. Exxon Mobil (XOM) up 17%? Occidental Petroleum rocketing 19%? ConocoPhillips (COP) picking up an astounding 24%?
These have been moves for the ages.
Energy is still one of my three core industries in which to invest over the next two decades.
The share prices for this sector got so low, they started to redefine the meaning of ?bargain?. The major integrated oil companies are now trading under book value with single digit multiples.
They essentially fell to liquidation values, assuming that the fall in the price of Texas tea halts at $38. Those are valuations almost as low as Apple (AAPL) saw two years ago. And you know what happened after that!
The absence of my Trade Alerts in this fertile field is happening because things could get worse for oil before they get better.
There is now a war for market share occurring between the world?s second and third largest producers, Saudi Arabia and Russia (the US is now number one).
Both countries desperately depend of rising prices and export volumes to maintain domestic political stability. When that doesn?t happen, budget deficits explode, spending gets cut, revolutions occur, and governments fall.
Saudi Arabia is now borrowing for the first time in modern history. Sanctions have shut Russia out of western debt markets. That?s why it has moved into Syria, to distract voters for domestic economic collapse.
And these aren?t countries that send former leaders to country clubs to practice their golf swings in retirement. Firing squads are more the order of the day.
Until recently, I would have said that China would step in and put a floor under the market to fuel their insatiable demand for energy. But they have run out of storage, and are unable to take more.
There is just no place to put it. They have even resorted to long-term charters of ultra large tankers, like the 434,000 tonne TI Europe, purely to build reserves.
The shake out is especially bad in the offshore sector, the planet?s most expensive source of crude. The same is true for Arctic exploration, with projects cancelled left and right.
A glut of new drilling rigs is about to hit the market, ordered during more prosperous times years ago, while existing ones can be snapped up for 40 cents on the dollar.
Oil suffers from the additional damnation in that it is being dragged down by the global commodity collapse. Unless an asset class is made out of paper and pays an interest rate or a dividend, it is getting dissed to an unbelievable degree.
All of this means that the price of oil could churn around current levels for a little while longer before putting in a convincing bounce. The low $40?s should hold, but we might see a one day spike down to $38 a barrel one more time.
If you had told me when I was fracking for natural gas in the Barnett Shale 16 years ago that this process would ultimately cause the collapse of Russia and Saudi Arabia, me and my roustabout buddies would have said you were nuts.
Yet, that is precisely what seems to be happening.
So many railcars have been diverted to the oil trade that farmers are now having trouble getting a record grain crop to market. This is why railroads have been booming (click here for ?The Railroads Are making a Comeback?.
The energy research house, Raymond James, recently put out an estimate that domestic American oil production (USO) would rise to 9.1 million barrels a day by the end of 2015.
That means its share of total consumption will leap to 46% of our total 20 million barrels a day habit. These are game changing numbers.
Names like the Eagle Ford Shale, Haynesville Shale, and the Bakken Shale, once obscure references on geological maps, are now a major force in the country?s energy picture.
The value of this extra 3.5 million barrels/day works out to $47.5 billion a year at current prices (3.5 million X 365 X $45). That will drop America?s trade deficit by nearly 15% over the next three years, and almost wipe out our current account deficit.
Needless to say, this is a hugely dollar positive development, and my own Trade Alerts have profitably been reflecting that.
This 3.5 million barrels will also offset much of the growth in China?s oil demand for the next three years. Fewer oil exports to the US also vastly expand the standby production capacity of Saudi Arabia.
If you want proof of the impact this will have on the economy, look no further that the coal (KOL), which has been falling in a rising market.
Power plant conversion from coal to natural gas (UNG) is accelerating at a dramatic pace. That leaves China as the remaining buyer, and their economy is slowing.
It all makes the current price of oil at $45 look inviting. Cushing, Oklahoma is awash in Texas tea, and the Strategic Petroleum Reserve stashed away in salt domes in Texas and Louisiana is at its maximum capacity of 727 million barrels.
It was concerns about war with Syria, Iran, ISIL, and the Ukraine that took prices to $107 in the spring last year. My oil industry friends tell me this fear premium added $30-$40 to the price of crude. That premium is now gone.
It seems that every time a new group grabs an oil field in the Middle East, they ramp up production, rather than destroy it, so they can milk it for the cash. This is why 15 tankers are afloat around the world carrying Kurdish crude to sell on the black market.
Once Europe and Asia return to a solid growth track, oil will recover to $70 a barrel or more.
Until then, discretion is the better part of valor, and I?ll be sitting on those Trade Alerts.
It is also why I am keeping oil companies with major onshore domestic assets, like Exxon Mobil (XOM) and Occidental Petroleum (OXY), in my long-term model portfolio.
Sorry, but We?re Full
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/TI-Europe-e1412717755446.jpg263400Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2015-10-27 01:06:572015-10-27 01:06:57Is This the Bottom for Oil?
I was almost alone in the desert last August, when I asserted that the dramatic sell off in share prices was nothing more than a stock market event (click here for ?The Volatility Peak is In?.
The economy was fine, there were no geopolitical events of importance, and prices would recover once sanity returned to the market in the fall.
I went through great pains to deliver you lists of shares that would lead the recovery, which have proven wildly successful (click here for ?Ten Stocks to Buy at the Bottom?.
I even used the rare opportunity of the wild summer market action to teach you how to survive and prosper during these tumultuous conditions (click here for ?How to Trade a Crash?.
Today, all of these efforts finally bore fruit.
The S&P 500 (SPY) decisively broke through the 200-day moving average to the upside. The big cap index had not enjoyed this rarified, intoxicating atmosphere since August 20.
The coast is clear.
And guess what the two leadership sectors are?
Industrials and consumer discretionaries, which I trumpeted to you on my extended research piece only yesterday (click here for ?Switching From Growth to Value?.
The big question is: ?What do we do now??
You usually don?t get a clean break of a 200-day moving average the first time around. Many believe this is a false breakout, sucking in hot money bulls just before another meltdown in November.
So we may get some choppy backing and filling right around the key 200-day number of $204.34.
This will test the faithful.
The bears will get some assistance from the Republican Party, which may attempt to shut down the government one more time by refusing to raise the debt ceiling.
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew has warned that the government could run out of money as early as November 3.
If my thesis is correct, external events such as these will just fall away like water off a duck?s back, beyond a peripatetic day or two. Use them as buying opportunities.
This breakout certainly paves the way for a run to new all time highs for the (SPY) in the $2,200-$2,300 range by March 2016, and possibly as soon as the Christmas holidays.
It?s ?RISK ON? again, baby.
The Coast is Clear (The West coast of Portugal)
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/John-Thomas2-e1445546669777.jpg298400Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2015-10-23 01:08:022015-10-23 01:08:02The Coast is Clear
Featured Trade: (FRIDAY, OCTOBER 30 SAN FRANCISCO STRATEGY LUNCHEON)
(SWITCHING FROM GROWTH TO VALUE),
(GE), (BAC), (C), (GS), (HD), (DIS), (AAPL), (MSFT),
(UUP), (FXE), (FXY), (YCS), (CYB), (FXA), (FXC)
General Electric Company (GE)
Bank of America Corporation (BAC)
Citigroup Inc. (C)
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS)
The Home Depot, Inc. (HD)
The Walt Disney Company (DIS)
Apple Inc. (AAPL)
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT)
PowerShares DB US Dollar Bullish ETF (UUP)
CurrencyShares Euro ETF (FXE)
CurrencyShares Japanese Yen ETF (FXY)
ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS)
WisdomTree Chinese Yuan Strategy ETF (CYB)
CurrencyShares Australian Dollar ETF (FXA)
CurrencyShares Canadian Dollar ETF (FXC)
https://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.png00Mad Hedge Fund Traderhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMad Hedge Fund Trader2015-10-22 01:08:112015-10-22 01:08:11October 22, 2015
Legal Disclaimer
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.