Mad Hedge Technology Letter
May 23, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(WHY THE BIG DEAL OVER ZTE?),
(MU), (QCOM), (INTC), (AAPL), (SWKS), (TXN), (BIDU), (BABA)
Tag Archive for: MU
Here's the conundrum.
Beyond cutting-edge technology, there's nothing that China WANTS OR NEEDS to buy from the U.S. China's largest imports are in energy and foodstuffs, both globally traded commodities.
China is playing the long game because it can.
Earlier this year, China altered its constitution to remove term limits and any obstacle that would hinder Chairman Xi to serve indefinitely.
If it's two, four, eight or 10 years, no problem, China will wait it out.
As it stands, China is enjoying the status quo, which is a robust economic trajectory of 6.7% economic growth YOY and at that rate will leapfrog America as the biggest economy in the world by 2030.
China does not need handouts.
It already has its mooncake and is eating it.
The Chinese are also betting that Donald Trump fades away with the passage of time, possibly soon, and that a vastly different administration will enter the fray with an entirely different strategy.
The indefinite "hold" pattern is a polite way to say we surrender.
ZTE Corporation is a Chinese telecommunications equipment manufacturer and low-end smartphone maker based in Shenzhen, China.
This seemingly innocuous company is ground zero for the U.S. vs China trade practice dispute.
The U.S. Department of Commerce banned American tech companies from selling components to ZTE for seven years, crippling its supply chain after violating sanctions against Iran and North Korea.
ZTE uses about 30% of American components to produce its smorgasbord of telecom equipment and down-market cell phones.
What most people do not know is that ZTE is the fourth most prevalent smartphone in America, only behind Apple, Samsung, and LG, commanding a 12.2% market share, and its phones require an array of American made silicon parts.
In 2017, the company shipped more than 20 million phones to the United States.
The ruling effectively put ZTE out of business because the lack of components shelved production.
Low-end smartphones account for almost one-third of total revenue.
ZTE could very well have survived with a direct hit to its consumer phone business, but the decision to ban components made the telecom equipment division inoperable.
This segment accounts for a heavy 58.2% of revenue. Therefore, disrupting ZTE's supply chain would effectively take down more than 91% of its business for a company that employs 75,000 employees in over 160 countries.
Upon news of ZTE's imminent demise, the administration made a U-turn on its initial decision stating "too many jobs in China lost."
The reversal made America look bad.
It shows that America is being dictated to and not the other way around.
When did it become the responsibility of the American administration to fill Chinese jobs for a company that is a threat to national security?
The Chinese refused to continue talks with the visiting delegation until the ZTE situation was addressed.
Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin and company were able to "continue" the talks then were politely shown the door.
Bending the rules for ZTE should have never been a prerequisite for talks, stressing the lack of firepower in the administration's holster.
However, stranding the delegation in Chinese hotel rooms for days waiting in limbo, without offering an audience, would have caused even more humiliation and anguish for the administration.
China is not interested in buying much from America, but one thing it needs -- and needs in droves -- are chips.
Long term, this ZTE ban is great for China.
I believe China will use this episode to rile up the nationalistic rhetoric and make it a point to wean itself from American chips.
However, for the time being, American chips are the most valuable import America can offer China, and that won't change for the foreseeable future.
The numbers back me up.
Micron (MU) earns more than $10 billion in revenue from China, which makes up over 51% of its total revenue.
Qualcomm (QCOM), mainly through its lucrative licensing division, makes more than $14.5 billion from its Chinese revenue, which comprises over 65% of revenue.
Texas Instruments (TXN) earns more than 44% of revenue from China, and almost a quarter of Intel's (INTC) revenue is derived from its China operations.
The biggest name embedded in China is Apple (AAPL), which earned almost $45 billion in sales last year. Its China revenue is three times larger than any other American company.
In less than a decade, China has caught up.
China now has adequate local smartphone substitutes through Huawei, Oppo, Vivo, and Xiaomi phones.
Skyworks Solutions (SWKS), a chip company reliant on iPhone contracts, is most levered toward the Chinese market capturing almost 83% of revenue from China.
You would think these chips would be the first on the chopping block in a trade war. However, you are wrong.
China needs all the chips it can get because there is no alternative.
Stopping the inflow of chips is another way of stopping China from doing business and developing technology.
The Chinese economy has been led by the powerful BATs of Baidu (BIDU), Tencent, and Alibaba (BABA) occupying the same prominent role the American FANGs hold in the American economy.
They are not interested in digging their own grave.
To execute the 2025 plan to become the world leaders in advanced technology, they need chips that power all modern electronic devices.
The most likely scenario is that China maintains development using American chips for the time being and slowly pivots to the Korean chip sector, which is vulnerable to Chinese political pressure.
Remember that South Koreans have two of the three biggest chip companies in the world in Samsung and SK Hynix. China has used economic coercion to get what it wants from Korea in the past or to prove a point.
Korean multinational companies, shortly after the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) installation on the Korean peninsula, were penalized by the Chinese government shutting down mainland Korean stores, temporarily banning Chinese tourism in South Korea, and blocking K-pop stars from performing in the lucrative Chinese market.
The Chinese communist government can turn the screws when it wants and how it wants.
Therefore, the next battleground for tech could migrate to South Korean chip companies as China is on a mission to suck up as much high-grade tech ingenuity as possible while it can.
China has some easy targets to whack down if the administration forces it into a corner with a knife to its throat.
Non-tech companies are ripe for massacre because they do not produce chips.
Companies such as Procter & Gamble, Starbucks, McDonald's, and Nike could be replaced by a Chinese imitation in a jiffy.
Apple is the 800-pound gorilla in the room.
An attack on Apple would hyper-accelerate tension between two leaders to the highest it's ever been and would be the straw that breaks the camel's back.
Technology has transformed the world.
Technology also has been adopted by nations as a critical component to national security.
Nothing has changed fundamentally, and nothing will.
China will become the biggest economy in the world by 2030.
China will kick the proverbial can down the road because it can. It never has to cooperate with America again.
Contrary to expectations, American chip companies are untouchable, and investors won't see Micron suddenly losing half its revenue over this trade war.
Until China can produce higher quality chips, it will lap up as much of Uncle Sam's chips until it can force transfer the chip technology from the Koreans.
American chip companies can breathe a sigh of relief.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"If we go to work at 8 a.m. and go home at 5 p.m., this is not a high-tech company and Alibaba will never be successful. If we have that kind of 8-to-5 spirit, then we should just go and do something else." - said Alibaba founder and executive chairman Jack Ma.
Global Market Comments
May 11, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(WEDNESDAY, JUNE 13, 2018, PHILADELPHIA, PA, GLOBAL STRATEGY LUNCHEON),
(MAY 9 BIWEEKLY STRATEGY WEBINAR Q&A),
(FB), (MU), (NVDA), (AMZN), (GOOGL),
(TLT), (SPX), (MSFT), (DAL),
(MAD HEDGE DINNER WITH BEN BERNANKE)
Below please find subscribers' Q&A for the Mad Hedge Fund Trader May 9 Global Strategy Webinar with my guest co-host Bill Davis of the Mad Day Trader.
As usual, every asset class long and short was covered. You are certainly an inquisitive lot, and keep those questions coming!
Q: Would you still short Facebook (FB)?
A: Right now, no. I thought the dynamics changed off the last earnings report, so the answer is no. We have made a ton of money trading Facebook this year, and all of it has been from the long side.
Q: How will the election affect the market?
A: It will go down into the election, but you'll then get a strong rally as the uncertainty fades away. It really makes no difference who wins. It is the elimination of uncertainty that is the big issue.
Q: Do you have a price to buy Micron Technology (MU) or NVIDIA (NVDA), or do you want to wait for a crash day?
A: I want to wait for a crash day, because even though these are great companies, on the down days, they fall twice as fast as any other stock. Your entry point is very important in that situation.
Q: Do you see opportunities to sell short the U.S. Treasury bond market (TLT) again?
A: Yes. But wait for the four-point rally not the two-point rally.
Q: Rising interest rates should benefit banks - why are they such horrible performers?
A: The double in bank stocks in 2017 fully discounted this year's interest rate move. For banks to really perform interest rates have to move higher still, which they will eventually.
Q: When will the yield curve invert and what will be the implications?
A: You can take the Fed's current rate of interest rate rises (which is 25 basis points every three months) and essentially calculate that the yield curve inverts at the end of 2018 or the beginning of 2019. Recessions and bear markets always follow six months after that inversion takes place. That's when interest rates start to rise very sharply as bond investors panic and unwind all their leveraged long positions.
Q: Why are you not involved with Amazon (AMZN) and Google (GOOGL)?
A: I've already taken big profits in both of these and I'm just waiting for another serious dip before I get back in again.
Q: What happens to stock buybacks?
A: While other investors are pulling out of the market, stock buybacks are doubling. But, that is only happening, essentially, in the tech stocks - they're the buyback kings. If you don't have a serious buyback program this year, your stock is falling. Companies are the sole net buyers of the market this year, and they are only buying their own stocks.
Q: What do you see the upper and lower end of the S&P 500 (SPY) range to November?
A: I think we've already got it: 2,550 on the low side, 2,800 on the high side - that a 10% range and you can expect it to get narrower and narrower going into November. After that, we get an upside breakout to new all-time highs.
Q: When will rates be negative next?
A: In the next recession, the bottom of which will be in 2 to 2.5 years; that's when interest rates in the U.S. could go negative, as they did in Japan and Europe for several years.
Q: What is your No. 1 pick in the market today?
A: We love Microsoft (MSFT) long term. However, right now the background macro picture is more important than stock selection than any single name, so we're keeping a position in Microsoft in the Mad Hedge Technology Letter, but not in Global Trading Dispatch. We're sort of hanging back, waiting for another sell-off before we touch anything on the long side in GTD. Remember, the money is made on a buy in the new position, not on the sell going out.
Q: Was the semiconductor chip sell-off overdone?
A: Absolutely - the negative report was put out by a new analyst to the industry who doesn't know what he's talking about. If you ask all the end users of the chips, all they talk about is A.I., and that means exponential growth of chip demand.
Q: Is it a good time to buy airline stocks (DAL)?
A: No, until we get a definitive peak in oil, and a speed up again in the economy, you don't want to touch economically sensitive sectors like the airlines.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 30, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(RIDING THE CHIP ROLLER COASTER),
(Samsung), (SK Hynix), (AMD), (NVDA), (INTC), (MU)
The supply side of the chip market is spectacularly volatile, rotating between supply constraints and times of overcapacity.
A good place to analyze the heartbeat of the chip market is across the Pacific on South Korean shores.
South Korea takes pride and joy in having given the world two first-rate semiconductor companies - Samsung and SK Hynix.
Samsung is just behind Intel (INTC) in total annual sales.
American consumers are more familiar with Samsung through its consumer electronics division that constructs Samsung smartphones and tablets.
Samsung's silicon business mirrors the elevated earnings results stateside, as muscular demand derived from global data center expansion devours more chips than Samsung can pump out.
Global data centers in the U.S. and Asia will sustain blistering growth levels into the second quarter.
Samsung has displayed resilience to seasonally shift in the consumer electronics segment by staunchly bolstering its relentless chip business.
Samsung is harvesting the benefits of bountiful investments from over the past decade when this overly cyclical industry was exposed to extreme shifts in worldwide appetite for consumer electronics devices.
More than 70 percent of revenue was generated by the chip division boasting quarterly revenue of $19.25 billion.
In the past, memory chip companies endured a ruthless market environment with a diverse set of players ratcheting up supply on a whim then finding demand crumbling before their eyes.
Restructuring has left the burden of supplying the next generation of technology a backbreaking burden.
Tight chip supply and the general shortage of hardware rears its ugly head in earnings reports with a slew of CEOs complaining about input prices rising worse than global warming sea levels.
In Samsung's earnings call, management groaned that "memory supply and demand fundamentals remain tight."
In SK Hynix's earnings call, it echoed that "demand and supply dynamics in the market will remain favorable."
As large cap tech expands data center initiatives and throws piles of money at autonomous cars, A.I. and cloud computing, Samsung's semiconductor division appears nearly immortal.
Chip prices skyrocketed in this sellers' market and the UBS downgrade of Micron (MU) was a headscratcher.
Analyst Timothy Arcuri turned bearish on Micron citing "cyclical memory concerns" and "big estimate cuts."
Sometimes it feels that analysts don't follow the industry they cover.
It is fair to say chip volume might face marginal cuts closer to 2019, but the pendulum hasn't even started to shift back over to that direction.
Suppliers and buyers both agree that capturing the appropriate volume of chips is the first order of the day.
In response to outsized demand, Samsung will double chip capital spending because of failing to match skyrocketing demand.
Fortifying the bull case, SK Hynix guesstimated DRAM demand for the rest of 2018 to be in the "low-20 percent" and even the injection of new funds for facility expansion is not a proper solution.
Samsung also hammered into investors that it is not in the business to drive the chip prices to zero, and the gross profit metric is more important to them than most people expect.
A goldilocks scenario could ensue with Samsung supplying enough to create price hikes and ploughing its cash back into more silicon expansion.
Korean memory chip producers are expected to enjoy a booming business during the remainder of this year as global DRAM chip demand will surpass supply.
SK Hynix also indicated that server products would supersede mobile products as data center related products are all the rage.
Korea's No. 2 said NAND demand would rise by "mid-40 percent" in 2018, which is double the rise in demand than DRAM products.
Instead of the estimate cuts on which UBS is waiting, the more likely scenario is an easing of chip constraints. The easing will last just long enough before the next massive wave of demand hits with a vengeance.
You read my thoughts - the generational paradigm shift due to hyper-accelerating technology has largely made the boom-bust cycle irrelevant.
Chip demand will go up in a straight line, and this is just the beginning.
Legend has it that demand weakness shows up every 15 years. The last one was the global financial crisis in 2008, and the one before that was the dot-com crash of 2001.
In both instances, the disappearance of demand contributed to massive oversupply. The declining prices set off a price war eradicating margins and revenue.
SK Hynix net profit was $2.89 billion last quarter, an increase of 64.4 percent YOY.
SK Hynix capital allocation layout includes a spanking new factory in Cheongju, a city in South Korea.
The insatiable demand brought on by China's quest for technological supremacy is the market the new Cheongju factory will serve.
International chip directors fret that a sudden breakthrough in local Chinese technology could ignite a supply bonanza of cut-rate semiconductors, forcing a recapitulation of the entire industry that encountered egregious oversupply issues about 10 years ago.
But China can't dump low-cost chips into the market due to technological frailties.
Notice that Chinese capital has been flirting with American chip companies for years without success.
The Chinese government even initiated an investigation at the tail end of last year because DRAM price spikes were indigestible for local Chinese companies.
The dearth of supply is not just restricted to one extraneous niche of the hardware industry, as the tightness is broad-based.
Don't look further than AMD (AMD), which specializes in GPU (graphics processing unit) products and has received glowing reviews for its Ryzen and EPYC CPU processors that boast higher-level performance than previous products.
The RX Vega series is the new line of GPUs from AMD that launched last August. Tech-enthusiast website techspot.com described finding these GPUs on sale in stores as "next to impossible."
AMD is well informed of the market outlook and NVIDIA (NVDA) notes that hardware-intensive cryptocurrency mining is stoking excess marginal demand for its products.
AMD is boosting production, but manufacturing is set back by a component shortage in GDDR5 memory, which is needed in the RX 400 card.
The RX 500 card, part of the RX Vega line, is also having delays with a lack of HBM2 memory.
Crypto-fanatics aren't the only consumers clamoring for extra GPUs; gamers require GPUs to perform at top levels.
AMD has even urged retailers to advise gamers of any outlets where they can buy GPUs because of the dearth of supply.
Gamers are being outmaneuvered for GPUs as crypto-miners usually buy up every last unit to transport to mining farms in far-flung places with cheap energy.
Hardware products cannot be produced fast enough to meet demand.
Other industries vying for a portion of chips are military, aerospace, IoT (Internet of Things) products, and autonomous cars.
Incremental supply is accruing but often the supply is added slower than initially thought. Suppliers are hesitant to double down on new factories because of past, bitter experiences at the end of a cycle.
Management monitors inventory channels like a hawk eyeing its prey, and it's clear that organic demand is following through.
After running away with 22.2% growth in 2017, the semiconductor industry is due to take a quick breather expanding in the upper teens in 2018.
A year is an eternity in technology and calling for production "cuts" in a period of massive undersupply is premature.
The claim of "cyclical" headwinds comes at a time of a new-found immunity to cyclical demand and is dubious at best.
This secular story has legs. Don't believe every analyst that pushes out reports. They often have alternative motives.
Nvidia (NVDA) reports earnings on May 10, and CEO Jensen Huang does a great job explaining the development at the front-end of the tech revolution.
Earnings should be extraordinary. Imagine if the price of bitcoin stabilizes, GPU manufacturers will wrestle with continuous quarters of strained supply.
I am bullish on chips.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"Focus on the 20 percent that makes 80 percent of the difference." - said Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff when asked to explain the story of his cloud business.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
April 23, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(HOW NETFLIX CAN DOUBLE AGAIN),
(NFLX), (AMZN), (IQ), (ORCL), (MU), (AMAT), (CRUS), (QRVO), (IFNNY), (NVDA), (JD), (BABA), (MSFT)
The first batch of earnings numbers are trickling in, and on the whole, so far so good.
A spectacular earnings season will further cement tech's position at the vanguard of the greatest bull market in history.
The bull case for technology revolves around two figures indicating "RISK ON" or "RISK OFF".
The first set of numbers from Netflix (NFLX) emanated sheer perfection.
Netflix has gambled on its international audience to drive its growth and unceasing creation of premium content to reach these lofty targets set forth.
It worked.
Consensus was that domestic subscription growth had peaked, and Netflix would have to lean on overseas expansion to beat earnings estimates.
American subscription growth knocked it out of the ballpark, beating expectations by 480,000 subscriptions. The street expected only 1.48 million new adds. The 1.96 million shows the American online streamer is resilient, and the migration toward cord-cutting is happening faster than initially thought.
International adds were pristine, beating the 5.02 million estimates by 440,000 million new subscribers.
Content is king as Netflix has proved time and time again (we notice that here at Mad Hedge Fund Trader, too). Netflix plans to fork out about 700 original series in 2018.
By 2023, Netflix could grow its subscriber base to close to 400 million. The potential for international advancement is immense considering foreign companies are playing catch-up and cannot compete with the level of Netflix's content.
The earnings report coincided with Netflix announcing a forceful push into Europe, doubling its allocated content-related investments to $1 billion.
All of Netflix's estimates take into consideration that it is shut out of the Chinese market. Ironically, the Netflix of China, named iQIYI (IQ), just recently went public on the Nasdaq.
Amazon Web Services (AWS), the cloud-arm of Amazon (AMZN), revenue numbers are the other numbers that are near and dear to the pulsating heartbeat of the bull market.
Jeff Bezos, Amazon's CEO, penned a letter to shareholders that Amazon prime subscribers blew past the 100 million mark.
The positive foreshadowing augurs nicely for Amazon to surprise to the upside when it reports earnings next week on April 26.
Expect more of the same from cloud companies that are overperforming.
The few glitches in tech are minor. It is mindful to stay on the right side of the tracks and not venture into marginal names that haven't proved themselves.
For instance, Oracle (ORCL) had a good, not great, earnings report but shares still cratered after CEO Safra Catz dissatisfied analysts with weak cloud forecasts of just 19%-23% growth.
The street was looking for cloud guidance over 24%. Oracle is still being punished for its legacy tech segments.
The chip sector got pummeled after several chip manufacturers announced weak supply order from Apple.
This is hardly a surprise with Apple slightly missing iPhone estimates last quarter by 1%.
Chip stocks such as Lam Research (LRCX), Micron (MU), and Applied Materials (AMAT) look like affordable bargains. They should be seriously considered after share prices stabilize buttressed by support levels.
The outsized problem is that hardware suppliers have headline risks because of large cap tech's preference toward vertically integrating.
Along with price efficiencies, vertically integration aids design aspects and streamline product production time horizons.
This is not the end of chips.
Consumers need the silicon to generate and extract all the data coming to market.
Particularly, Apple (AAPL) went over its skis trying to push expensive smartphones to a saturated market when all the rip-roaring growth is at the low end of the market.
Apple still managed to sell more than 77 million iPhones, but the trade war rhetoric will deter Chinese consumers from purchasing American tech products. Until now, Apple has counted on China as its best growth prospect. The administration had other ideas.
Any noteworthy Apple supplier has gotten punched in the nose, but crucially, investors must stay out of the SMALLER chip players that rely on narrow revenue sources to keep them afloat.
Bigger chip companies can withstand the shedding of a few revenue sources but not Cirrus Logic (CRUS).
(CRUS) shares have been beaten mercilessly the past year sliding from $68 to a horrifying $37.74 today.
(CRUS) produces audio amplifier chips used in iPhone devices, and weak iPhone X guidance is the cue to bail out of this name.
The company extracts more than 75% of its revenues by selling audio chips used in iPhone devices. Ouch!
Last quarter saw horrific performance, stomaching a 7.7% decline in revenues due to tepid demand for smartphones in Q4 2017.
Cirrus Logic provided an underwhelming outlook, and it is not the only one to be beaten into submission behind the woodshed.
Apple has signaled to its suppliers that it will view production in a different way.
Imagination Technologies, a U.K. company, was informed that its graphic chips are not needed after 2018.
Dialog Semiconductor, another U.K.- based operation, shared the same destiny, as its power management chip was cut out of the production process, sacrificing 74% of revenue.
To top it all off, Apple just announced it plans to manufacture its own MicroLED screens in Silicon Valley, expunging its alliance with Samsung, Sharp, and LG, which traditionally yield smartphone screens for Apple. And Apple plans to make its own chips, phasing out Intel's chips in Apple's MacBook by 2020.
Qorvo (QRVO), Apple's radio frequency chips manufacturer, also can be painted with the same brush.
Apple was responsible for 34% of the company's total revenues in 2017.
Weak iPhone guidance set off a chain reaction, and the trembles were most felt at the bottom feeder group.
Put Infineon Technologies (IFNNY) in the same egg basket as Qorvo and Cirrus Logic. This company installs its cellular basebands in iPhones.
FANG has split into two.
Netflix and Amazon continue producing sublime earnings reports, and Apple and Facebook have hit a relative wall.
It will be interesting if the government's harsh rhetoric toward Amazon amounts to anything.
One domino that could fall is Amazon's lukewarm relationship with the US Postal Service.
Logistics is something the Chinese Amazon's JD.com (JD) and Alibaba (BABA) have successfully adopted. Look for Amazon to do the same.
However, I will say it is unfair that most tech companies are measured against Netflix and Amazon, even for Apple, which earned almost $50 billion in profits in 2017.
It is insane that companies tied to a company that prints money are reprimanded by the market.
But that highlights investors' pedantic fascination with pandemic growth, cloud, and big data.
Making money is irrelevant today. Investors should be laser-like focused on the best growth in tech such as Amazon, Netflix, Lam Research, Nvidia (NVDA), and Microsoft (MSFT), which know how to deliver the perfect cocktail of results that delight investors.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Quote of the Day
"$500? Fully subsidized? With a plan? That is the most expensive phone in the world. And it doesn't appeal to business customers because it doesn't have a keyboard. Which makes it not a very good email machine." - said former CEO of Microsoft Steve Ballmer on the introduction of the first iPhone.
Global Market Comments
April 13, 2018
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(ANNOUNCING THE MAD HEDGE LAKE TAHOE, NEVADA, CONFERENCE, OCTOBER 26-27, 2018),
(APRIL 11 GLOBAL STRATEGY WEBINAR Q&A),
(TLT), (TBT), (GOOGL), (MU), (LRCX), (NVDA) (IBM),
(GLD), (AMZN), (MSFT), (XOM), (SPY), (QQQ)
Below please find subscribers' Q&A for the Mad Hedge Fund Trader April Global Strategy Webinar with my guest co-host Bill Davis of the Mad Day Trader.
As usual, every asset class long and short was covered. You are certainly an inquisitive lot, and keep those questions coming!
Q: Many of your April positions are now profitable. Is there any reason to close out before expiration?
A: No one ever got fired for taking a profit. If you feel like you have enough in hand - like 50% of the maximum potential profit in the position, which we do have in more than half of our current positions - go ahead and take it.
I'll probably run all of our April expirations into expiration day because they are very deep in the money. Also, because of the higher volatility and because of higher implied volatility on individual stock options, you're being paid a lot more to run these into expiration than you ever have been before, so that is another benefit.
Of course, one good reason to take profits now is to roll into another position, and when we find them, that may be exactly what we do.
Q: What do you think will be the impact of the US hitting Syria with missiles?
A: Initially, probably a 3-, 4-, or 500-point drop, and then a very rapid recovery. While the Russians have threatened to shoot down our missiles, in actual fact they can't hit the broad side of a barn. When Russians fired their cruise missiles at Syrian targets, half of them landed in Iran.
At the end of the day, it doesn't really impact the US economy, but you will see a big move in gold, which we're already starting to see, and which is why we're long in gold - as a hedge against all our other positions against this kind of geopolitical event.
Q: Will 2018 be a bull market or a bear market?
A: We are still in a bull market, but we may see only half the returns of last year - in other words we'll get a 10% profit in stocks this year instead of a 20% profit, which means it has to rise 12% from here to hit that 10% up by year-end.
Q: What is your take on the ProShares Ultra Short 20+ Year Treasury Bond Fund (TBT)?
A: I am a big buyer here. I think that interest rates (TLT) are going to move down sharply for the rest of the year. The (TBT) here, in the mid $30s, is a great entry point - I would be buying it right now.
Q: How do you expect Google (GOOGL) to trade when the spread is so wide?
A: It will go up. Google is probably the best-quality technology company in the market, after Facebook (FB). We'll get some money moving out of Facebook into Google for exactly that reason; Google is Facebook without the political risk, the regulatory risk, and the security risks.
Q: Are any positions still a buy now?
A: All of them are buys now. But, do not chase the market on any conditions whatsoever. The market has an endless supply of sudden shocks coming out of Washington, which will give you that down-400-points-day. That is the day you jump in and buy. When you're buying on a 400-down-day, the risk reward is much better than buying on a 400-point up day.
Q: What is "sell in May and go away?"
A: It means take profits in all your positions in May when markets start to face historical headwinds for six months and either A) Wait for another major crash in the market (at the very least we'll get another test of the bottom of the recent range), or B) Just stay away completely; go spend all the money you made in the first half of 2018.
Q: Paul Ryan (the Republican Speaker of the House) resigned today; is he setting up for a presidential run against Trump in 2020?
A: I would say yes. Paul Ryan has been on the short list of presidential candidates for a long time. And Ryan may also be looking to leave Washington before the new Robert Mueller situation gets really unpleasant.
Q: What reaction do you expect if Trump resigns or is impeached?
A: I have Watergate to look back to; the stock market sold off 45% going into the Nixon resignation. It's a different world now, and there were a lot more things going wrong with the US economy in 1975 than there are now, like oil shocks, Vietnam, race riots, and recessions.
I would expect to get a decline, much less than that - maybe only a couple 1,000 points (or 10% or so), and then a strong Snapback Rally after that. We, in effect, have been discounting a Trump impeachment ever since he got in office. Thus far, the market has ignored it; now it's ignoring it a lot less.
Q: Thoughts on Micron Technology (MU), Lam Research (LRCX), and Nvidia (NVDA)?
A: It's all the same story: a UBS analyst who had never covered the chip sector before initiated coverage and issued a negative report on Micron Technology, which triggered a 10% sell-off in Micron, and 5% drops in every other chip company.
He took down maybe 20 different stocks based on the argument that the historically volatile chip cycle is ending now, and prices will fall through the end of the year. I think UBS is completely wrong, that the chip cycle has another 6 to 12 months to go before prices weaken.
All the research we've done through the Mad Hedge Technology Letter shows that UBS is entirely off base and that prices still remain quite strong. The chip shortage still lives! That makes the entire chip sector a buy here.
Q: Can Trump bring an antitrust action against Amazon?
A: No, no chance whatsoever. It is all political bluff. If you look at any definition of antitrust, is the consumer being harmed by Amazon (AMZN)?
Absolutely not - if they're getting the lowest prices and they're getting products delivered to their door for free, the consumer is not being harmed by lower prices.
Second is market share; normally, antitrust cases are brought when market shares get up to 70 or 80%. That's what we had with Microsoft (MSFT) in the 1990s and IBM (IBM) in the 1980s. The largest share Amazon has in any single market is 4%, so no there is basis whatsoever.
By the way, no president has ever attacked a private company on a daily basis for personal reasons like this one. Thank the president for giving us a great entry point for a stock that has basically gone up every day for two years. It's a rare opportunity.
Q: How will the trade war end?
A: I think the model for the China trade war is the US steel tariffs, where we announced tariffs against the entire world, and then exempted 75% of the world, declaring victory. That's exactly what's going to happen with China: We'll announce massive tariffs, do nothing for a while, and then negotiate modest token tariffs within a few areas. The US will declare victory, and the stock market rallies 2,000 points. That's why I have been adding risk almost every day for the last two weeks.
Q: Would you be buying ExonMobil (XOM) here, hoping for an oil breakout?
A: No, I think it's much more likely that oil is peaking out here, especially given the slowing economic data and a huge onslaught in supply from US fracking. We're getting big increases now in fracking numbers - that is very bad for prices a couple of months out. The only reason oil is this high is because Iran-sponsored Houthi rebels have been firing missiles at Saudi Arabia, which are completely harmless. In the old days, this would have caused oil to spike $50.
Q: Would you be selling stock into the rally (SPY), (QQQ)?
A: Not yet. I think the market has more to go on the upside, but you can still expect a lot of inter-day volatility depending on what comes out of Washington.
Q: Do you ever use stops on your option spreads?
A: I use mental stops. They don't take stop losses on call spreads and put spreads, and if they did they would absolutely take you to the cleaners. These are positions you never want to execute on market orders, which is what stop losses do. You always want to be working the middle of the spread. So, I use my mental stop. And when we do send out stop loss trade alerts, that's exactly where they're coming from.
Q: Will the Middle East uncertainty raise the price of oil?
A: Yes, if the Cold War with Iran turns hot, you could expect oil to go up $10 or $20 dollars higher, fairly quickly, regardless of what the fundamentals are. It's tough to be blowing up oil supplies as a great push on oil prices. But that's a big "if."
Hello from the Italian Riviera!