Mad Hedge Bitcoin Letter
October 11, 2022
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(KOWTOWS TO THE INSTITUTIONS)
(BTC), (ETH), (COIN), (GOOGL)
Tag Archive for: (GOOGL)
Google allowing crypto payments to its cloud services from Coinbase (COIN) doesn’t move the needle.
COIN is the crypto exchange platform that has run into a litany of problems recently from mass firing of staff to payment problems.
The news is a footnote to the carnage that is really happening front and center in the crypto market.
Funnily enough, why would a customer choose to pay for Google’s cloud services through Coinbase when an extortionate fee is levied on the Coinbase transaction?
Crypto isn’t cheap and it doesn’t pretend to be.
Ether (ETH) is infamous for its commission which they call “gas fees.”
In 2021, they charged an average of $63 for one transaction which is why it lags behind other cryptos like Bitcoin.
ACH transfers are free and so are debit and credit card purchases in most cases.
Even though El Salvador claims to be a crypto-first economy, most transactions are completed in cash which are US dollars.
At least crypto will now be allowed to transact on Google’s platform which is a victory in itself, but I don’t believe this will catch on like wildfire.
Crypto is up against a Sisyphean task.
The Google Cloud Platform infrastructure service will initially accept cryptocurrency payments from a handful of customers.
Over time, Google will allow many more customers to make payments with cryptocurrency.
Coinbase will earn a percentage of transactions that go through it.
It is high risk to hold crypto on the balance sheet.
Coinbase announced a $377 million impairment charge tied to a decline in the value of its cryptocurrency holdings in August.
Therefore, I expect Google to charge a fee to convert the crypto back to dollars once they accept the payment.
From the outside, this really does look like a marketing gimmick.
Blockchain technologies such as nonfungible tokens, or NFTs, have become a bigger focus for Google’s cloud division.
Previously, Google has pushed for growth in major industries such as media and retail. This year it announced the formation of teams to drum up blockchain business and build tools that third-party developers can draw on to run blockchain applications.
However, I thought that crypto was going at its lone-wolf style hoping to create a parallel system to the fiat money system which they despise.
Apparently not.
Tying up with a mega tech corporate firm sounds like they are giving up to me.
Seems as if the founding investors are ready to cash out and leave the die-hard crypto believers for a more stable income stream.
Annuity like income stream is something many crypto firms lack and locating one is a hard sell.
Crypto was supposed to be “decentralized” but this appears to be a move that will offer Google the keys to Coinbase’s data while limiting them to lateral moves.
In short, this is a move that allows more centralization to the biggest crypto platform in the United States.
Growth was crypto’s calling card and that means parabolic growth possibilities are over.
Integrating with Google also means Google will have a deep insight into how they can use Coinbase to profit from digital currencies since Coinbase has agreed to onboard their data onto Google’s cloud infrastructure.
Honestly, this is a bonehead strategic move for Coinbase and my inclination would be to buy Google’s stock if one believes in crypto.
Desperation can trigger some unusual moves and we are seeing that in real-time, but analyzing the bleak short-term prospects for crypto, this might be a move for survival than anything else.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
September 19, 2022
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(READING THE TECH TEA LEAVES)
(GOOGL), (FDX), (META), (SNAP)
Logistics company FedEx, although not a tech company, offers a fascinating insight into the health of the economy and the current state of the tech world.
Unfortunately for tech readers, the shipping company rang the alarm on the rapidly deteriorating state of the economy in August.
It’s my job to tell you how it will shake out for tech stocks.
FedEx’s earnings report disappointed signaling that tech stocks too, could be on the chopping block. I would agree with that too.
This debunks the myth of the “soft landing” that the US Central Bank likes to refer to with their challenge of high inflation. I believe the soft landing is priced into tech stocks, but not a hard landing yet.
The result is possibly more downside price action to tech stocks.
CEO Raj Subramaniam painted a gloomy picture of what to expect in terms of lower volumes.
FedEx could be the canary in the coal mine signaling ugly earnings for other large tech companies that do business around the world.
The tech companies that come to mind are Apple, Google, Facebook or Meta (META), and Snapchat (SNAP).
Raj is not the only executive who is spooking the tech market.
CEO of Alphabet or Google Sundar Pichai had his own gloomy opinion that adds insult to injury to the already negative sentiment prevailing in trader sentiment.
He said he feels “very uncertain” about the macroeconomic backdrop, and he is one of the few who has deep insight into the different layers of this complicated US economy.
He also warned that layoffs could be in the cards as the company seeks to boost its efficiency by 20% while staving off fierce economic headwinds and antitrust investigations.
A large element of such downbeat forecasts by executives is the roaring price hikes from everything like diapers to salami.
The one ironic tidbit that I took away from the last inflation report was that the recent explosion in inflation has been in rental housing.
If this is the case, then high-income individuals, who mostly own rental real estate, are passing on inflationary costs to their tenants who are strapped with a worse financial profile.
This means that high-income individuals still harness the resources to spend, spend, spend.
Why not go lease a new Maserati or Aston Martin?
If that’s the case, we could see this group pick up the slack and power spending all the way until Christmas which is a net negative for tech stocks because it delays the Fed pivot.
Warnings from Subramaniam and Pichai indeed have weight to them, but keep in mind that these businesses are optimized for scale and reflect the general situation of Americans, not just rich people.
High net worth individuals reloading the consumer bazookas don’t move the needle for the entire US economy, but they do have enough gunpowder to trigger another bout of inflation or rental increases to build on the already high inflation existing in US prices.
Short-term traders should focus on selling rallies in poor tech stocks as upside momentum cannot be sustained in the face of anticipated interest rate rises.
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
September 2, 2022
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(DON’T COMPROMISE)
(AAPL), (GOOGL)
A fresh analysis from the C-suite at the top 1,000 U.S. companies by revenue offers us critical insight into the direction of tech management.
It’s important to keep our finger on the pulse of what’s happening at the higher level of tech companies because these are the key people that drive the game-changing decisions.
It’s no surprise that the banking and financial services industry has the oldest average CEO age at 60, and the technology and energy sectors have the youngest CEOs at an average age of 57.
Technology companies harness new technologies that can lead to new businesses so that would usually trend younger.
Compared to other industries, tech companies also have a boom-bust element to them because technologies go extinct quicker, and refreshing a CEO is always on the table if the bust element creeps in.
Interestingly, the current tenure is down from an average of 8 years to 6 years, meaning that the leash for tech CEOs is getting shorter and shorter.
Much like highly paid professional athletes these days, there’s no learning on the job type of mentality. It’s overperform now or face the sack.
This mentality emphasizes short-term performance which revolves around the quarterly earnings report and stock-based compensation to employees.
Then add in the wild card of forced lockdowns and China’s increasingly aggressive attitude to politics and it’s simple to understand that boards need to quickly change management if they believe they cannot navigate these herculean tasks.
Just a few instances where critical decisions are being made can be seen in Apple when CEO Tim Cook yanked China production and moved factories to Vietnam.
Vietnam is becoming the new factory of the world for tech companies because costs and political risks associated with China are accelerating.
Now, throw in the Taiwan situation after top U.S. government officials chose to visit the island and tech companies are now worrying about their supply of Taiwan chips needed to harness artificial intelligence.
CFOs are usually the second most important person in a company behind the CEO because they guard the balance sheet and usually possess a strong accounting background.
Yet they can be disposed of quickly for bad performance which is why tech CFOs only tenure 4.1 years if we compare with other more stable industries.
The key findings here is that tech management has never been so prone to high turnover.
Due to the internet, competition has supercharged the fight for highly paid positions and data can be calculated in real time because of superior analytic platforms.
Management won’t be able to hide poor performance because of the close tracking.
As much as it’s difficult to make a famous name as a C-suite manager, tech CEOs with a proven track record can expect elevated attention which is why if guys who have built successful tech firms like Jack Dorsey reach out to investors, they will get whatever starting funds they need.
This builds on the winning take mentality in technology which has a few outsized winners among the crowd.
On the trading front, I would hesitate to buy tech stocks from management that is unproven.
I would urge traders to go into long-term bets on guys like Tim Cook, Sundar Pichai, and Elon Musk and don’t compromise on the quality of tech management because it makes a big difference in the future price of the stock.
Global Market Comments
August 12, 2022
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(AUGUST 10 BIWEEKLY STRATEGY WEBINAR Q&A),
(NVDA), (TSLA), (GOOGL), (ROM), (FCX), (AMZN), (AAPL), (MSFT), (MU), (ARKK), (TSLA), (F), (GM)
Below please find subscribers’ Q&A for the August 10 Mad HedgeFund Trader Global Strategy Webinar broadcast from Silicon Valley in California.
Q: What are your yearend targets for Nvidia (NVDA), Tesla (TSLA), and Google (GOOGL)?
A: Higher for all but I can’t give you the exact date and time. Google has a special situation in that they might be hit with an anti-trust suit in September, so that could cap things. For Tesla, we have the Twitter overhang, and Elon Musk sold $6.9 billion worth of stock last week to fund that. And then Nvidia could have another dive, depending on how much of a glut in chips there is, but I'd be buying any chips from here on. By the way, if Tesla breaks the old high of $1,200, which I expect by the end of the year, we could get to $2,000 very rapidly on yet another massive short squeeze against the permanent Tesla haters, who’ve already been completely decimated by the last 60% move.
Q: How would I play Amazon (AMZN) going forward?
A: Buy the dips. I think they’re going to be the world's dominant retailer going forward and they’re doing the right things and going crazy.
Q: Which sectors?
A: Well, for ETFs, you can look at the ProShares Ultra Technology ETF (ROM). That’s 2x leveraged long tech. But only do that on dips because the volatility of the ROM is enormous since it’s 2x in the most volatile sector. Also, I think we can start taking a look at banks again, what with interest rates rising and a recovery on the horizon, banks could come back into play after sitting at the bottom for the last 3 or 4 months.
Q: I’m doing a LEAP on Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX); should I go for January 2025 or 2024?
A: I’d go longer dated—that way you can get a bigger move and will almost certainly be on a full-on economic recovery, and massive electrification of the auto fleet by 2025, thanks to the climate bill that will be passed Friday. That means the demand for copper is about to go absolutely through the roof—I'm looking for (FCX) to go from $30 to $100 in the next 3 years.
Q: Thoughts on Disney (DIS)?
A: No one can believe how cheap Disney has gotten, it’s been a disaster. Obviously (DIS) took it on the nose with the recession and some of the parks still have limitations on the number of visitors. It should do better and I'm amazed it got this cheap. I would expect a move to the $200 level by the end of next year.
Q: What LEAPS do you recommend for January 2023?
A: Well it’s not really a LEAPS if you’re only going out 6 months; that’s just a long-dated call spread. LEAPS are usually a year or longer. I’d say pretty much anything in any sector will be higher except maybe energy by 2023. We’re not at LEAPS territory yet, but we’re getting close. The next major selloff I might start putting LEAPS out there.
Q: Is the Consumer Price Index (CPI) dropping from 9.1% YOY down to 8.5% meaning the top is in and deflation’s over?
A: I think so, because there are a lot of price declines that were not reflected in this July number that have yet to come. I'm talking about wheat, lumber, and energy. So yes, we could get another big move down in August, and if that’s the case, the Fed may only raise by 50 basis points in September. That's the hope. The things that aren’t going to go down are rental costs and labor costs. We may never get back to the inflation rate that we had 2 years ago of 2%. The long-term average for the last 100 years is 3% and certainly a move down to 4% is possible this year (and would be very welcome by the stock market as part of my long-term bull case).
Q: What are your thoughts on Elon Musk selling $6.9 billion worth of Tesla shares?
A: It’s amazing he sold that amount of stock last week and only went down $100. It does remove a big overhang on the stock and paves the way on a much bigger move up later in the year. By selling the $9 in January and $7 now, that’s $16 billion he sold this year. He could almost pay for Twitter with a little outside bank financing.
Q: How far above current prices should I place a LEAPS?
A: It depends on where the market is; if we’re having a cataclysmic selloff down 1,000-point days, then you can have the luxury of going 10%, 20%, or even 30% out-of-the-money; and that of course gets you a 100%, 200% and 300% returns. If we have a higher low, then you may want to go lower risk and go at the money, that might get you a 50% return. On LEAPS that are only slightly in-the-money, even those generate 25% returns one year out with the most conservative possible position.
Q: Would you load the boat on dips?
A: I would but remember: a dip is not one hour or on down days, it’s like half of the recent gain, which would be down 1,500 Dow points, or all of the recent gain, which would be down 3,000 points. So be careful that you don’t get too aggressive just because you’ve gotten bullish.
Q: Do you think the semiconductor chips will lead the tech recovery in the second half of the year?
A: I do, but we do have an inventory problem to digest first, and we have to figure out the implications of the CHIPS act that was signed this week which makes available a couple hundred billion dollars to build new chip factories in the US. Chip companies are particularly challenged right now because they have to provision for a recession which is going to cut chip demand, and they also have to provision for a potential oversupply created by the CHIPS Act. Remember that for the industry, creating safe supplies of chips means more lots of chips at lower prices for consumers. Great for us, great for the auto industry, not so great for chip companies. You have to be careful. On the other hand, on the bullish side, chips are being designed into more products faster and in larger numbers than ever before. This is the main reason why most investors underestimated the chip industry for the last 10 years. That also is a factor that’s accelerating. The average car now has 100 chips. 20 years ago they had maybe 10 chips, and 30 years ago they had none.
Q: Will the eventual big win of Ukraine against Russia result in inflation going back to 2%?
A: No, but it will result in it going back to 3% or 4%, which we could hit next year. You get oil back down below $50, gasoline down to $2/gallon, and the world's food supply opened up once again, and inflation will disappear in a heartbeat.
Q: What’s the deal with the 1% buyback tax in the inflation reduction package?
A: Well they had to get revenue somewhere, and 1% is so small it won’t inhibit anyone from buying back stock, especially if it makes the CEO a billionaire. That is a great incentive—even if you had a 50% tax, they would still be doing buybacks for things like Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), and the other buyback players.
Q: What will high energy prices do to crypto?
A: It might actually make it go up because the cost of electricity feeds straight into the manufacturing/programming cost of crypto. And if you notice, Bitcoin bottomed at $17,000 per bitcoin. But that's exactly where the new mining cost is. Just like all of the commodities, when you hit cost of production, the supply suddenly dries up because nobody can make any money at it.
Q: Will US homebuyers buy the dip since mortgage rates have come down?
A: Yes, and we’re already seeing that in the statistics. The fact is we still have a huge housing shortage in the United States. You don’t get big price falls when you have a shortage of supply, and you have 10 million millennials who still need to trade up from their one and two-bedroom apartments all over the country. So, things may stall a bit in home buying, but I don’t think you get very big price drops.
Q: Do you think the US consumer is strong?
A: They never stopped being strong, even throughout recession fears. Never, ever bet against the propensity of Americans to spend money, both individuals and governments.
Q: What are the chances the US goes to war with China over Taiwan?
A: Zero. # 1 China doesn't have ships, #2 we have the 7th Fleet there, and #3 they have been threatening to invade Taiwan for 70 years and done nothing. The Taiwanese are used to this. Though there is the other side issue that most of the other private companies in Taiwan are already owned by the Chinese and have Chinese capital, so it’s unlikely they want to blow up their own facilities. So, the answer is no.
Q: What is the Long term outlook for gold and silver?
A: It’s been dead for so long that I’m not inclined to rush into gold. But you have to expect that when you get a recovery in the commodity boom, it’s going drag gold and silver along with it. I see upsides for both of these, especially silver.
Q: Should student loans be paid off by the federal government?
A: I think yes, because as long as these people have massive debts, they cannot borrow and they cannot enter the US economy as consumers. If you forgive all student debt, you unleash 10 million new customers onto the market who can now borrow, get credit cards, and take out home mortgages. As long as they have massive debts, they can’t do that.
Q: With all the major companies in the world moving to EVs, where are we going to get these commodities?
A: We’re not. Tesla (TSLA) has already locked up major supplies of commodities over the next 10 years, and everyone else will have to pay more money. Some of the weaker producers like Ford (F) and General Motors (GM), are being restrained on shortages of not just chips but also basic commodities like chromium for stainless steel. They’re going to have a real problem competing with Tesla, which is why you own Tesla.
Q: What do you think about the unprofitable tech companies like those in the ARK ETFs (ARKK)?
A: I would avoid those for now. Why take on additional risk buying a non-earning company when the highest quality companies are selling at the cheapest valuations in ten years? Maybe when the big companies like Apple get overvalued—go up another 100% — then you might look at the smaller companies if they’re still cheap. But the risk/reward on the nonearners right now is no good, while it’s fantastic in the large tech companies. That is my opinion and I’m sticking to it.
Q: It seems Russia’s strategy has mirrored those of the Czars.
A: Actually, what they’re doing is repeating their WWII strategy, which worked in 1945— not so much in 2022; and that was massive artillery barrages against retreating Germans. Except this time Ukrainians are not retreating and have far more modern weapons than the Russians.
Q: Would you buy Micron Technology (MU) on bigger dips?
A: Absolutely yes; but again, wait for the down days. You have plenty of volatility in chip stocks, no need to pay up or chase higher prices.
To watch a replay of this webinar with all the charts, bells, whistles, and classic rock music, just log in to www.madhedgefundtrader.com, go to MY ACCOUNT, click on GLOBAL TRADING DISPATCH, then WEBINARS, and all the webinars from the last 12 years are there in all their glory.
Good Luck and Stay Healthy
John Thomas
CEO & Publisher
The Diary of a Mad Hedge Fund Trader
Mad Hedge Technology Letter
August 8, 2022
Fiat Lux
Featured Trade:
(DO THE ROOMBA)
(IRBT), (AMZN), (GOOGL)
You thought you could close the front door and be at peace – wrong.
You thought you could hide under the bed – wrong.
How about speaking freely in your house – triple wrong.
Whether it’s Google Nest Doorbell videoing your front porch or Amazon’s Alexa recording every sound from your kitchen, the data serpents are here to slurp up consumer personal data at a level we have never seen before.
Then when we thought it could go no further, bam!
Hit with another “Device” tracking our whereabouts and that sums up Amazon.com (AMZN) gobbling up a maker of robot vacuum cleaners IRobot Corp (IRBT).
Perhaps CEO of Amazon Andy Jassy can figure out how to train the robot vacuum cleaner to drop individual packages from the front door to the bedroom.
We need this type of innovation in Silicon Valley!
How would that happen?
Well, it basically acquired a mapping company. To be more precise: a company that can make maps of your home.
The company announced a $1.7 billion deal on Friday for iRobot Corp., the maker of the Roomba vacuum cleaner. And yes, Amazon will make money from selling those gadgets. But the real value exists in those robots’ ability to map your house.
This reinforces that data is the new oil.
Monopolizing the smart home is the holy grail for Amazon.
Its Echo smart speakers still outsell those from rivals Apple and Google, with an estimated 9.9 million units sold in the three months through March.
It’s followed that up with a $1 billion deal for the video doorbell-maker Ring in 2018, and the wifi company Eero a year later.
But you still can’t readily buy the Astro, Amazon’s household robot that was revealed with some fanfare last year, is still only available in limited quantities. That, too, seemed at least partly an effort to map the inside of your property, a task that will now fall to iRobot. The Bedford, Mass.-based company’s most recent products include a technology it calls Smart Maps, though customers can “opt” out of sharing the data. Amazon will get your data – mark my words they will some way and somehow.
What’s more, the acquisition looks like peanuts for eGiant which had $61 billion of cash at the end of June. The $1.7 billion deal represents a 22% premium to iRobot’s share price before the deal was announced. Less than a year ago, iRobot was valued at $2.5 billion. And it won’t take much to cover the target’s cost of capital. Its predicted profit may only be about $78 million next year, but it also has sales, marketing, and administrative costs of $389 million, a number that Amazon can surely bring down by pumping the products through its existing sales channels.
This deal represents a drop in the bucket for cash-rich Amazon.
As geopolitics mixes with stagflation elements, it’s easy to see how certain companies fall through the cracks.
Amazon is ready to scoop every smart home company and paying 22% premium for a $1.7 billion valuation is a chump change for AMZN.
As dip buyers come out of the woodwork, it’s hard to think that the bottom isn’t in.
The risk rewards favor tech stocks to the upside in what Fed officials have claimed is a “strong” economy and one that is certainly not in recession at all.
Buy every substantial dip in every one of your favorite stocks from here on out. You might be risking 10%-20% over the short term but gain 100% on a three-year view.
