Below please find subscribers' Q&A for the Mad Hedge Fund Trader May 9 Global Strategy Webinar with my guest co-host Bill Davis of the Mad Day Trader.
As usual, every asset class long and short was covered. You are certainly an inquisitive lot, and keep those questions coming!
Q: Would you still short Facebook (FB)?
A: Right now, no. I thought the dynamics changed off the last earnings report, so the answer is no. We have made a ton of money trading Facebook this year, and all of it has been from the long side.
Q: How will the election affect the market?
A: It will go down into the election, but you'll then get a strong rally as the uncertainty fades away. It really makes no difference who wins. It is the elimination of uncertainty that is the big issue.
Q: Do you have a price to buy Micron Technology (MU) or NVIDIA (NVDA), or do you want to wait for a crash day?
A: I want to wait for a crash day, because even though these are great companies, on the down days, they fall twice as fast as any other stock. Your entry point is very important in that situation.
Q: Do you see opportunities to sell short the U.S. Treasury bond market (TLT) again?
A: Yes. But wait for the four-point rally not the two-point rally.
Q: Rising interest rates should benefit banks - why are they such horrible performers?
A: The double in bank stocks in 2017 fully discounted this year's interest rate move. For banks to really perform interest rates have to move higher still, which they will eventually.
Q: When will the yield curve invert and what will be the implications?
A: You can take the Fed's current rate of interest rate rises (which is 25 basis points every three months) and essentially calculate that the yield curve inverts at the end of 2018 or the beginning of 2019. Recessions and bear markets always follow six months after that inversion takes place. That's when interest rates start to rise very sharply as bond investors panic and unwind all their leveraged long positions.
Q: Why are you not involved with Amazon (AMZN) and Google (GOOGL)?
A: I've already taken big profits in both of these and I'm just waiting for another serious dip before I get back in again.
Q: What happens to stock buybacks?
A: While other investors are pulling out of the market, stock buybacks are doubling. But, that is only happening, essentially, in the tech stocks - they're the buyback kings. If you don't have a serious buyback program this year, your stock is falling. Companies are the sole net buyers of the market this year, and they are only buying their own stocks.
Q: What do you see the upper and lower end of the S&P 500 (SPY) range to November?
A: I think we've already got it: 2,550 on the low side, 2,800 on the high side - that a 10% range and you can expect it to get narrower and narrower going into November. After that, we get an upside breakout to new all-time highs.
Q: When will rates be negative next?
A: In the next recession, the bottom of which will be in 2 to 2.5 years; that's when interest rates in the U.S. could go negative, as they did in Japan and Europe for several years.
Q: What is your No. 1 pick in the market today?
A: We love Microsoft (MSFT) long term. However, right now the background macro picture is more important than stock selection than any single name, so we're keeping a position in Microsoft in the Mad Hedge Technology Letter, but not in Global Trading Dispatch. We're sort of hanging back, waiting for another sell-off before we touch anything on the long side in GTD. Remember, the money is made on a buy in the new position, not on the sell going out.
Q: Was the semiconductor chip sell-off overdone?
A: Absolutely - the negative report was put out by a new analyst to the industry who doesn't know what he's talking about. If you ask all the end users of the chips, all they talk about is A.I., and that means exponential growth of chip demand.
Q: Is it a good time to buy airline stocks (DAL)?
A: No, until we get a definitive peak in oil, and a speed up again in the economy, you don't want to touch economically sensitive sectors like the airlines.
Not every stock comes with Warren Buffett's confession that he would like to own 100% of it. But, of course that stock would have to be a tech stock.
As it stands, the Oracle of Omaha owns 5% of Apple (AAPL), and his confession is still a bold statement for someone who seldom forays outside his comfort zone.
Buffett also continues to concede that he "missed" Google (GOOGL) and Amazon (AMZN).
What a revelation!
The outflow of superlatives invading the airwaves is indicative of the strength technology has assumed in the bull market.
The tech sector has been coping with obstacles such as higher interest rates, trade wars, data regulation, IP chaos, and the globalization backlash.
However, the tech companies have come through unscathed and hungry for more.
Their power is not contained to one industry, and techs' capabilities have been spilling over into other sectors digitizing legacy industries.
Every CEO is cognizant that enhancing a product means blending the right amount of tech to suit its needs.
It is not halcyon times in all of tech land either.
There have been some companies that have faltered or were naturally cannibalized by other tech companies that disrupt business.
Times are ruthless and this is just the beginning.
There will be winners and losers as with most other secular paradigm shifts.
Particularly, there are two types of losers that investors need to avoid like the plague.
The first is the prototypical tech company hawking legacy products such as Western Digital Corp. (WDC) that I have been banging on the table telling investors not to buy the stock.
The lion's share of revenue is still in the antiquated hard drive business that has a one-way ticket to obsolescence.
Yes, they are turning around product mixes to factor in its pivot to solid state drives (SSD), but they are late to the game and deservedly punished for it.
Compare WDC to companies that have completed the transition from legacy reliance to the cloud, and it is simple to understand that companies such as Microsoft, which struggled for years to turn around with CEO Satya Nadella, finally can claim victory.
The problem with WDC is the stock's price action performs miserably because the company is tagged as an ongoing turnaround story.
On the other hand, headliner cloud plays experience breathtaking gaps up due to the strength of the cloud such as Amazon (AMZN), Red Hat (RHT), and Salesforce (CRM), just to name a few.
To pour fuel on the fire, speculative reports citing NAND chip price "softening" beat down the stock into submission.
Effectively, legacy companies become sell the rallies type of stocks.
Transforming a legacy company into a high-octane cloud company is perilous to say the least. Jeff Bezos recently gloated that Amazon Web Service's (AWS) seven-year head start is all investors need to know about the cloud. There is some merit to his statement.
Examples are rife with bad executive decisions by legacy companies such as HP Inc. (HPQ), another legacy tech company that makes computers and hardware. It ventured out to buy Palm for $1.2 billion plus debt after a bidding war with legacy competitor Dell in 2010.
In 1996, the Palm PDA (Personal Digital Assistant) was the first smart phone on the market that predated BlackBerry's smart phone with the full keyboard made by RIM (Research in Motion).
The demise of Palm emerged from a hodgepodge of mismanagement, failed spin-offs, misplaced mergers, and resource wastefulness even with the preeminent technology of its time.
(HPQ)'s stab at the smartphone market resulted in purchasing Palm. However, after heavy selling pressure in its shares, HP shut down this division and sold off the remaining technology to Chinese electronics company TCL Corporation.
The sad truth is many transformations fail at step one, and there is no guarantee a newly absorbed business will perform as expected.
RIM, now changed to BlackBerry (BB), soon found out how it felt to be Palm when Steve Jobs dropped the first iPhone on the market, and the world has never been the same.
(BB) gradually morphed into an autonomous vehicle technology company after the writing was on the wall.
The other types of losers are companies with inferior business models such as Snapchat (SNAP), which I have written about extensively from the bearish side.
In an age where disruptors are being disrupted by other disruptors, CEOs must live in fear that their business will get undercut and hijacked at any time.
Instagram, a subsidiary of Facebook (FB), has permanently borrowed numerous features from Snapchat. Its Instagram "stories" feature is now used by more than 300 million daily users.
Snapchat is serving as Instagram's guinea pig while CEO Evan Spiegel finds an alternative way to survive against Facebook's unlimited resources.
Both are in the game of selling ads and nobody does it better than Facebook and Alphabet or has the degree of scale.
The recent redesign was met with a chorus of universal boos. The 60 minutes I spent testing the new design reconfirmed my fears that the new design was an unmitigated washout.
In short, Snap's redesign seemed like a different app and became incredibly difficult to use.
Compounding the deteriorating situation, Snapchat laid off 120 engineers due to sub-par performance and withheld last year's performance bonuses even though co-founder Evan Spiegel received $637 million in 2017.
The latest earnings report was a catastrophe.
Daily active user (DAU) growth, the most sought out metric for Snapchat, failed to deliver the goods. The street expected 194.2 million DAU and Snap reported 191 million. A miss of 3.2 million users and a deceleration of growth QOQ.
Remember that Snapchat is substantially smaller than Instagram and should have no problems surpassing expectations on a smaller scale, thus investors voted with their feet and bailed on the stock after the catatonic performance last quarter.
Instagram is six times larger with more than 800 million users as of the end of 2017.
Top line fell short of expectations and average revenue per user (ARPU) dropped to $1.21, far less than the expected $1.27.
The less than stellar redesign faced a rebellion from long-term Snapchat disciples. More than 1.2 million Snap diehards signed a petition hoping to revert back to the old interface, and its updated ratings in Apple's app store has fallen to 1.6 stars out of 5.
Then the perpetual question of why would advertisers want to pay for Snapchat digital ads when they earn more by buying Instagram ads?
This remains unsolved and appears unsolvable.
Snapchat is befuddled by the pecking order and the company is on a train to nowhere.
To hammer the nail in the coffin, Snapchat announced to investors that it expects revenue to "decelerate substantially" next quarter.
In an era where technology companies will lead the economy and stock market, and has an outsized influence in politics and culture, not all tech companies are one-foot tap-ins.
Investors need to separate the wheat from the chaff or risk losing their shirt.
"We have to stop optimizing for programmers and start optimizing for users." - said American software developer Jeff Atwood
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Quarterly-Average-Daily-Active-Users-image-3-e1525727102446.jpg319580MHFTRhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMHFTR2018-05-08 01:05:022018-05-08 01:05:02Buffett Goes All In With Apple
Everyone and their mother was waiting for Facebook (FB) to fluff their lines, but they defied the odds by posting solid performance.
The data police can go back to eating doughnuts because it is obvious that regulation won't fizzle out the precious growth drivers that Mark Zuckerberg relies on to please investors.
I even begged readers to buy the regulatory dip, and I was proved correct with Facebook shares rebounding from $155 to $173.
The dip buying was proof that investors have faith in Facebook's business model.
The Cambridge Analytica scandal threatened to tear apart the quarterly numbers and place Facebook in the tech doghouse, but stabilization in Monthly Active Users(MAU) and bumper digital ad revenue growth was the perfect elixir to an eagerly anticipated earnings report.
Facebook showed resilience by growing (MAU) to 2.2 billion, up 13% at a time when attrition could have reared its ugly head.
The market breathed a huge sigh of relief as the Facebook beat came to light.
The battering that Facebook received in the press effectively lowered the bar and Facebook delivered in spades.
The unfaltering migration to mobile continues throughout the industry with mobile digital ad revenue making up 91% of ad revenue, which is a nice bump from the 85% last quarter.
Overall, Facebook grew revenues 49% YOY to $11.97 billion.
There is no getting around that Facebook is a highly profitable business due to the lack of costs. I should be so lucky.
Remember at Facebook, the user is the product.
Instead of paying for rising TAC (Traffic Acquisition Costs) as does Google (GOOGL) or the $8 billion outlay for Netflix's (NFLX) annual content budget, Facebook pours its money into improving its digital platform and advancing its ad tech capabilities.
However, moving forward, Facebook will have to cope with extra regulatory costs.
Facebook recently hired a legion of content supervisors at minimum wage to root out the toxic content roaming around on its platform.
Site operators have doubled to 14,000. This number gives you a taste why the large cap tech names are best positioned to combat the new era of regulation.
Doubling the staff of any business would be a tough cost pill to swallow.
Many companies would go under, but Facebook has the cash to mitigate the additional cost of doing business.
This defensive initiative casts Facebook in a better light than before like a superhero rooting out the evil villain.
Facebook and its co-founder Mark Zuckerberg need to hire a better public relations team to ensure that Mark Zuckerberg isn't pigeonholed in mainstream media as the monster of tech.
The Amazon-effect is infiltrating every possible industry, and even the bigger tech names are coping with the Amazon (AMZN) spillage onto competitors' turf.
A risk down the line is Amazon's booming digital ad business nibbling away at Facebook's own digital ad model.
ARPU (Average Revenue Per User) remains robust with Facebook earning $23.59 per North American user, which is the most lucrative geographic location.
Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) is a tool that Facebook has implemented into its platform and monitoring apparatus.
Removing damaging content preemptively is the order of the day instead of being blamed for harboring nefarious content.
One example of this use case has been targeting ISIS- and Al Qaeda-related terror content with 99% of inappropriate content removed before being flagged by a human.
Heavy investments in A.I. will make Facebook a safer place to share content.
Big events exemplify the strength of Facebook.
During the Super Bowl in February, around 95% of national TV advertisers were simultaneously posting ads on Facebook because of the viral effect commercials and posts have during massive events.
Tourism Australia is another firm that bought ads on Instagram and Facebook platforms during the Super Bowl.
The campaign was hugely successful with half the leads for Tourism Australia coming directly from Facebook.
Facebook acts as the go-to provider for quality digital marketing and this will not change for the foreseeable future.
Investors can feel comfortable that there was no advertiser revolt after the big data chaos.
Facebook is improving its ad tech, and new ad products will be introduced to the 2.2 billion MAUs.
For instance, Facebook developed a carousel of rotating ads on Instagram Stories, and advertisers will be able to share up to three video or photos now instead of one. If the user swipes up, the swipe will take them directly to the advertisers' websites.
The shopping experience is more personalized now with an updated news feed that will show a full-screen catalog to help the user find whatever is in their search.
Facebook will only get better at placing suitable ads that mesh with the users' interests or hobbies.
Investors must be cautious to not let macro-headwinds sabotage existing positions.
Facebook's underlying growth drivers remain intact, but the stock is vulnerable to regulation headline risk that caps its short-term upside.
There is also the possibility that another Cambridge Analytica is just around the corner, which would result in a swift 10% correction.
Next earnings report should be interesting because it will reflect the first quarter that Facebook has operated with higher security expenses and will go a long way to validating its business model in a new era of rigid regulation.
If Facebook does not fill in the moat around the business, then Facebook is braced to grow top and bottom line with minimal resistance.
The cherry on top was the additional $9 billion of buybacks giving the stock price further support.
Facebook is a long-term hold but a risky short-term trade.
"Never trust a computer you can't throw out a window." - said Apple cofounder Steve Wozniak.
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Monthly-active-users-image-2-e1525206758859.jpg429580MHFTRhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMHFTR2018-05-02 01:05:112018-05-02 01:05:11Facebook Goes from Strength to Strength
Well, not quite but he is turning into one after Amazon delivered a mythical earnings report that left Amazon haters in awe.
The Amazon bears patiently waiting for the day of reckoning will have to wait longer as Amazon smashed earnings expectations by a magnitude of two or three.
Amazon had a lot riding on the most recent earnings report after racing to new highs in mid-March.
The brief macro-correction then gave investors yet another entry point into one of the best companies of our generation that is still up more than 30% this year.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) revenue reaccelerated from its 42% growth last year to a high octane 49% YOY and made up a disproportionate 73% of Amazon's operating income.
Amazon is heavily reliant on the AWS segment to carry it through feast or famine.
According to Jeff Bezos, its critically acclaimed cloud segments' outstanding results originate from the "seven-year head start before like-minded competition."
This reaffirms the benefit of first-mover advantage with which large cap tech is obsessed.
There is room for other companies in the cloud space, with the cloud industry expanding 20% in 2018 to $186 billion.
Therefore, expanding by 20% is the bare bones minimum to be considered relevant.
Amazon has positioned itself to funnel in the most dollars that migrate toward the cloud as the industries pioneer and best of breed.
After the latest earnings report, Amazon is in pole position to become the first publicly traded $1 trillion company.
This latest quarter wrapped up its 62nd consecutive quarter of 20% plus growth.
And the commentary coming out of the earnings reports makes it almost certain that Amazon will capture more market share.
There were a few bombshells dropped that were unequivocal positives for investors.
First, Amazon has become the third player in digital ad industry with the duopoly of Google search and Facebook.
Amazon revved up its digital ad revenue by 139% QOQ to a substantial $2.03 billion per quarter business.
This business is particularly appetizing because of its high margins and will help alleviate tight margins on the e-commerce side.
Amazon's digital ad business is by far the fastest growth lever in its portfolio. It will ramp up this side of the business whose main function is to match consumers with suitable products that consumers otherwise would miss out on in a standard Amazon search.
The extraordinary numbers support the notion that the hoopla of Washington regulation is all bark and no bite.
Facebook also delivered a prodigious quarter for the ages amid testimony and public backlash that resulted in immaterial damage to top- and bottom-line numbers.
The second bombshell announced was the change in pricing to prime members. Amazon upped its annual prime membership to $119 from $99.
This additional $20 price hike, or 20% on 100 million prime members, will swell revenue by an extra $2 billion of incremental revenue.
In total, Amazon will accrue a bonus of 4% of revenue by this price change.
Amazon has a high fixed-cost business, and slightly tweaking prices will create a huge windfall with the revenue almost entirely flowing down to the bottom line in the form of pure profit.
Many industry analysts claim that Amazon has the best management team in the industry and explicate this company as an "Internet staple."
More than 100 million products are delivered with free shipping for Amazon prime customers. This is starkly higher than the 20 million products shipped for free in 2014.
Amazon does everything in its power to offer a unique and efficient experience for customers.
The customer satisfaction reveals itself by the rock-bottom churn rate.
Amazon prime at an annual cost of $119 is such a value that no analysts even dared to ask Amazon CFO Brian Olsavsky if consumers would take issue with the rise in price.
Investors and strangers alike assume that broad-based reoccurring revenue from annual prime membership is a given.
In an era of mass-scrutinization, Amazon's earnings call seemed like a celebration of the mythical achievements that are changing consumer behavior by the day.
The lack of inquiry was justifiable this time because the one major shortcoming suddenly remedied itself.
Amazon's doubters frequently attack the lack of margin growth because its business model is first and foremost a land grab for market share ignoring any remnants of margin stability.
Now that Amazon's digital ad business has sprouted up, the margin story, starting from a miniscule base, will go from weakness to an unrelenting success.
Amazon started with its ultra-thin margin e-commerce business that made an operating loss of $160 billion in 2017.
Cranking up a shiny, high margin business will be hard for the other FANGs to compete with as they gyrate toward other businesses that have lower margins than Amazon's digital ad segment.
This is a horrible time to start fighting Amazon in price wars as the paradigm shift to quantitative tightening has made the cost of capital demonstrably pricier.
Operating margins almost doubled from 2% to 3.8% on $51 billion of quarterly sales.
This is a huge deal.
Amazon has been continuously harangued for "not making money." Well, that era is over.
Profits, and not only revenue, will start accelerating and Amazon will become the closest thing to a perfect company.
The years and years of plowing cheap capital back into fulfillment center and e-commerce activity gave Amazon a stained reputation for years.
However, as Amazon turns the screws and uses its foundational leverage to capture additional profits, the other FANGs will be forced down the same path ruining operating margins for the other big players.
Amazon telegraphed its quest for market share strategy to investors years ago, and investors understand they are paying for growth and growth only.
That will change now that profits have become a real part of its arsenal.
There is no doubt that Amazon will deploy its profits back into expanding its company because Jeff Bezos knows that if he can grow Amazon's top-line number, investors will follow suit.
Also, spending means improving the products, and Amazon has never hesitated to spend big.
The move into digital ad growth is a warning shot to Facebook and Google. Amazon will mobilize its workforce to take on other business, and anything that is high margin is fair game.
The future looks bleak for retail competitors Walmart and Target, as the contents of the earnings report reaffirms Amazon's unrelenting assault on the retail sector, which is systematically being dissected by Amazon for fun.
Google search and Facebook are in Amazon's crosshairs. Staving off this monster will be hard to do in the long run.
Amazon has a clear path to further market gains, and operating margins are almost at a tipping point.
Revenue is poised to re-accelerate because of the reignition of AWS to a higher growth trajectory.
Shoring up operating margins through a burgeoning digital ad division will only be a boon to earnings in the future.
Amazon is one of the best companies in the world, and any weakness in the stock should be bought and held forever.
"I do not fear computers. I fear a lack of them," - said writer Isaac Asimov.
https://www.madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Segment-results-image-4-e1525122705584.jpg386580MHFTRhttps://madhedgefundtrader.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/cropped-mad-hedge-logo-transparent-192x192_f9578834168ba24df3eb53916a12c882.pngMHFTR2018-05-01 01:05:152018-05-01 01:05:15Amazon Kills It Again
Below please find subscribers Q&A for the Mad Hedge Fund Trader April Global Strategy Webinar with my guest co-host Mike Pisani of Smart Option Trading.
As usual, every asset class long and short was covered. You are certainly an inquisitive lot, and keep those questions coming!
Q: Are you out of Alphabet (GOOGL) and Microsoft (MSFT)?
A. I'm out of Alphabet and I'm in Microsoft, but only for the very short term. I'm waiting for another big meltdown day to go back and buy everything back because I think the FANGs and technology in general are still in a secular bull market.
Q. Are Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and NVIDIA (NVDA) affected by the underperformance of Bitcoin?
A. They are. Bitcoin has been an important part of the chip story for the last two years because mining, or the creation of bitcoins, creates enormous demand for chips to do the processing. I think selling in bitcoin is over for the time being. You had a $25 billion in capital gains taxes that had to be paid by April 15.
People were paying those bills by selling their bitcoins. That's over now, and bitcoin is rallied about 30% since Tax Day because of that. So, yes, bitcoin is getting so big that it is starting to affect the chip sector meaningfully. That is another reason why we see secular long-term growth in the entire chip sector.
Mike Pisani: Interesting take on bitcoin today, and I've been with you on it. I think the worst of it is over; it's going to go. Today is the largest volume day we've seen on it so far. We're up over 15,500 contracts traded.
Q: If you're 100% cash, is now a good time to commit funds to the equity market?
A. Franz, I would say nein. Absolutely not. 2009 was the time to commit funds to the equity market. If you're 100% cash now I would stay out for the next six months. We may get a good entry point over the summer or the fall. I'll let you know when that happens because I will be jumping back in myself.
But right now, a week ahead of the worst six months of equity investment of the year, I would stay away and do research instead. Read your Mad Hedge Fund Trader letters. Build a list of names that you're going to buy on the next meltdown and practice buying meltdowns with your practice account, which doesn't use real money.
There's a lot of things you can get ready to do for the next leg up in the bull market, but buying right now, NO! I would put that in the category of, "Is it time to start shorting bonds question?" that we got a few minutes ago.
Q: Why did tech stocks sell off when they have great earnings results?
A: It's called, "Buy the rumor, sell the news." So many people already own the stocks and were expecting good earnings that there was no surprise when they were announced. These are some of the most over-owned stocks in history.
Everybody in the world owns them. Many people have multiple weightings in them, so when we enter a high-risk macro environment, which we have now, you want to get rid of the most over-owned stocks. That is exactly why all of these stocks that have had great runs are selling off, even though they have great earnings report.
Q: Are financials a good play here with interest rates rising though 3%?
A. Normally I would say yes. However, the macro background for the general market are so negative they are overwhelming any positive fundamentals specific to individual sectors like banks and stocks like Citigroup (C). By the way, financials all reported great results and got killed, so that is why I bailed out of my (C) position this morning at around cost. If you throw the best news in the world on a stock and it won't go up, it's time to get out of there.
Q: Would an unleveraged inverse ETF like the ProShares Short S&P 500 ETF (SH) be good at a spike even now?
A. Yes, but when I say spike up better expect at least 20 (SPY) points or 1,000 Dow points. All these downside ETFs are great but you've got to get in at the right price. You know as they say in trading school, the profit is always made on the "BUY" and not on the "SELL."
So, if you can get on one of these super spikes up on the short side that is a great trade. So is the ProShares Ultra Short ETF (SDS) if you want to do the 2X leverage short fund. We've recently started doing this every month. We've been shorting (SPY)s and buying (VIX) on every one of these spikes up, and it's been working like a charm.
Q: Here's the best question of the day. Your timing has been perfect says Mary in Chicago, Ill.
A: Well, I'll take that kind of question all day long. Thank you very much. You're too nice to do that.
Q: Richard is asking would you buy an NVIDIA (NVDA) LEAP?
A: I would wait for meltdown days. Remember this is a market that gives you lots of meltdown days. Just wait for the next presidential tweet and you might get another 600-700-point dip in the markets. Those are the days you buy LEAPS. You don't have to get buy writing Trade Alerts like I do. You can just enter a limit order in your account. Put it as a stupidly low level to "BUY" and you may get hit. And that's where you really make the big money in this kind of market.
Q: Is there a good one- or two-month trade in Amazon?
A: Yeah, Paul, with this volatility you can pick a big winner like Amazon and you know to buy the 250-point dips and sell the rallies. These ranges are so wide now that even a beginner can make money. So, I would say you have to wait until after tomorrow on Amazon and let them get their earnings out. We know they're going to be great. They're doing home deliveries now to your car.
Q: Can long bond interest rates go up to 4%, and if that happens what would the market do?
A: Yes, they can go up to 4%, and I expect them to probably do that next year. What will it do to the market? Answer: Cause a bear market and a recession. Is that answer clear enough? My bet is that interest rates cap in this cycle much lower than they did in past cycles, maybe 4%-5%. We have been used to zero cost of money for so long that a move to 4% would be like stabbing somebody in the chest. People are much less able to deal with rising rates than they ever have been in the past, so watch this space.
Q: Should I buy the ProShares Ultra Short Treasury ETF (TBT) or the iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond Fund (TLT)?
A: Brad, it's really is a leverage question for you. The (TLT) is 1X; the TBT is 2X, so I would be taking profits on the (TBT) here and then buying a couple of points lower. Or if you want to keep it for the long term you can but remember the cost of carry on the TBT is around 7% a year.
Q: Yves in Paris, France is asking: What possible scenario will you see material wage growth that could lead to higher inflation?
A: We're starting to see that now with the ultra-low unemployment rates. People are having great difficulty hiring anyone in technology. But at the minimum wage level there seems to be plenty of supply. The other possibility is that the cost of everything else goes up but wages, because technology is replacing jobs so fast there may never be any increase in wages.
So, we will get inflation, but nothing like the inflation we saw in the past driven by rising wages, commodity prices, oil prices, and interest rates. Yes, money is a commodity, which can add quite a lot to the cost of leveraged companies like airlines, REITs, and so on.
Q: Will rising interest rates force the US dollar up?
A. The answer is yes! It has been a long time coming, but if rates continue to rise from here, you can expect that to lead to a continuously rising dollar and falling foreign currencies, and that will become a major drag on the economy and corporate earnings going forward.
Q: When is a good time to buy TIPS?
A: Just like your Treasury bond short, I would buy Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS) on the next rally in bond prices (TLT) and dip in yields. That will give you a decent entry point. That said, TIPS have been a horrible performer for the last 10 years because there has just been no inflation. A lot of people just keep TIPS as a hedge in their portfolio and it just costs them money every year.
Q: Which could blow up, Brad wants to know, TBT or TLT?
A: The easy answer there is probably neither. But if I had to pick between the two, the (TBT) would be the one to blow up because it's a 2X and has a lot less liquidity. So, I can't image in what world has (TBT) blowing up, but then I don't watch zombie TV shows either.
Q: I think US equities are expensive. Are emerging markets (EEM) or Europe (HEDJ) a better bet for the rest of the year?
A: I would say yes. Because if interest rates here in the US go higher that means a stronger dollar. That means a weaker US stock market. Because US companies are punished by a rising dollar. And European and Asian companies benefit from a rising dollar and falling home currencies, so that makes Europe the first choice of any of the global markets.
Q: Does oil going to $100 have a chance of bringing down the US economy?
A: Absolutely yes. If oil prices don't start to slow down, they will start having a big impact on the economy because that means rising prices for any energy consumer, which is you and me.
With no ability to offset that by rising prices of your products that would put a squeeze on any oil consuming industry, which is why things like the transports and consumer staples have been performing so poorly. If we get to $100, then you're really looking at a full-on recession and bear market for stocks. By bear market I mean down 25% or more in stocks.
Q: How do you see the India ETF?
A: We like it. India is the No. 1 pick of any hedge fund investor in emerging markets, and the ETF you can buy there is the PowerShares India Portfolio ETF (PIN).
There is a very high degree of risk involved in trading. Past results are not indicative of future returns. MadHedgeFundTrader.com and all individuals affiliated with this site assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. The indicators, strategies, columns, articles and all other features are for educational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. Information for futures trading observations are obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not warrant its completeness or accuracy, or warrant any results from the use of the information. Your use of the trading observations is entirely at your own risk and it is your sole responsibility to evaluate the accuracy, completeness and usefulness of the information. You must assess the risk of any trade with your broker and make your own independent decisions regarding any securities mentioned herein. Affiliates of MadHedgeFundTrader.com may have a position or effect transactions in the securities described herein (or options thereon) and/or otherwise employ trading strategies that may be consistent or inconsistent with the provided strategies.
